Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trends in Centralization of Cancer Surgery

  • Healthcare Policy and Outcomes
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The association between procedure volume and clinical outcomes has led many to advocate centralization of cancer procedures at high-volume centers (HVCs). Regional studies show practice patterns changing with increasing centralization of esophageal and pancreatic procedures at HVCs but little change for colorectal procedures. We hypothesize that similar trends are occurring nationwide.

Methods

Secondary data analysis was performed by means of the National Inpatient Sample. We examined trends in hospital procedure volume from 1999 to 2007 for all extirpative esophageal, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer procedures. Survey-weighted multivariate logistic regressions were used to examine the likelihood of surgery at a low-volume center (LVC) over time as well as to determine sociodemographic factors associated with surgery at LVCs.

Results

A total of 351,164 cases met the inclusion criteria (6,345 esophagus, 17,658 pancreas, 255,753 colon, 71,408 rectum). The likelihood of surgery at a LVC in 2007 compared to 1999 was as follows: esophagus odds ratio [OR] 0.42 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.34, 0.53), pancreas OR 0.40 (95% CI, 0.35, 0.46), colon OR 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85, 0.91), rectum OR 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78, 0.89). Admission through an emergency department was associated with a higher likelihood of surgery at a LVC, even after adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic factors. Volume was also associated with race and payer; black patients and the uninsured were particularly likely to remain at LVCs.

Conclusions

Practice patterns have changed substantially to follow national recommendations for centralization of complex cancer surgery. Despite this, disparities remain with regard to access to HVCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, et al. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, et al. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245:777–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, et al. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA. 2000;283:1159–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gruen RL, Pitt V, Green S, et al. The effect of provider case volume on cancer mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:192–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2327–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hollenbeck BK, Dunn RL, Miller DC, et al. Volume-based referral for cancer surgery: informing the debate. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hewitt M, Petitti D. Interpreting the volume-outcome relationship in the context of cancer care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Evidence Based Hospital Referral. Washington, DC: Leapfrog Group c/o Academy Health; 2008.

  10. Riall TS, Eschbach KA, Townsend CM Jr, et al. Trends and disparities in regionalization of pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1242–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho V, Heslin MJ, Yun H, et al. Trends in hospital and surgeon volume and operative mortality for cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:851–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stitzenberg KB, Sigurdson ER, Egleston BL, et al. Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4671–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gasper WJ, Glidden DV, Jin C, et al. Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade. Ann Surg. 2009;250:472–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steiner C, Elixhauser A, Schnaier J. The healthcare cost and utilization project: an overview. Eff Clin Pract. 2002;5:143–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:1364–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bailie K, Dobie I, Kirk S, et al. Survival after breast cancer treatment: the impact of provider volume. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13:749–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barbieri CE, Lee B, Cookson MS, et al. Association of procedure volume with radical cystectomy outcomes in a nationwide database. J Urol. 2007;178:1418–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barocas DA, Mitchell R, Chang SS, et al. Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2010;28: 243–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Billingsley KG, Morris AM, Dominitz JA, et al. Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship. Arch Surg. 2007;142:23–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Birkmeyer JD, Warshaw AL, Finlayson SR, et al. Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 1999;126:178–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bristow RE, Puri I, Diaz-Montes TP, et al. Analysis of contemporary trends in access to high-volume ovarian cancer surgical care. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3422–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen CS, Liu TC, Lin HC, et al. Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? A population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110:349–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheung MC, Hamilton K, Sherman R, et al. Impact of teaching facility status and high-volume centers on outcomes for lung cancer resection: an examination of 13,469 surgical patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheung MC, Koniaris LG, Perez EA, et al. Impact of hospital volume on surgical outcome for head and neck cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1001–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Upchurch GR Jr, et al. Hospital volume and surgical outcomes for elderly patients with colorectal cancer in the United States. J Surg Res. 2003;114:50–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Enzinger PC, Benedetti JK, Meyerhardt JA, et al. Impact of hospital volume on recurrence and survival after surgery for gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;245:426–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, et al. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg. 2005;242:540–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ. Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. West J Med. 1996;165:294–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gutierrez JC, Perez EA, Moffat FL, et al. Should soft tissue sarcomas be treated at high-volume centers? An analysis of 4205 patients. Ann Surg. 2007;245:952–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kovalic JJ, Perez CA, Grigsby PW, et al. The effect of volume of disease in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:905–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin CC, Lin HC. Effects of surgeon and hospital volume on 5-year survival rates following oral cancer resections: the experience of an Asian country. Surgery. 2008;143:343–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mitchell RE, Lee BT, Cookson MS, et al. Radical nephrectomy surgical outcomes in the University HealthSystem Consortium Data Base: Impact of hospital case volume, hospital size, and geographic location on 40,000 patients. Cancer. 2009;115:2447–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ptok H, Marusch F, Kuhn R, et al. Influence of hospital volume on the frequency of abdominoperineal resection and long-term oncological outcomes in low rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:854–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Salz T, Sandler RS. The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1185–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, et al. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA. 2000;284:3028–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E, et al. Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg. 2002;236:583–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Effective health care: hospital volume and health care outcomes, costs and patient access. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 1996;2:1–14.

  38. Hogan AM, Kennelly R, Winter DC. Volume-outcome analysis in rectal cancer: a plea for enquiry, evidence and evolution. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:111–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kressner M, Bohe M, Cedermark B, et al. The impact of hospital volume on surgical outcome in patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1542–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McGrath DR, Leong DC, Gibberd R, et al. Surgeon and hospital volume and the management of colorectal cancer patients in Australia. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:901–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hodgson DC, Zhang W, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:708–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Truong C, Wong JH, Lum SS, et al. The impact of hospital volume on the number of nodes retrieved and outcome in colorectal cancer. Am Surg. 2008;74:944–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu JH, Zingmond DS, McGory ML, et al. Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery. JAMA. 2006;296:1973–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gray BH, Schlesinger M, Siegfried SM, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of high-volume hospitals. Inquiry. 2009;46:322–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Supported in part by NIH P30 CA 043703.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Karyn B. Stitzenberg MD, MPH

  2. Institute for Health Policy and Research, American College of Surgeons, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Karyn B. Stitzenberg MD, MPH

  3. University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Neal J. Meropol MD

Authors
  1. Karyn B. Stitzenberg MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neal J. Meropol MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karyn B. Stitzenberg MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stitzenberg, K.B., Meropol, N.J. Trends in Centralization of Cancer Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 17, 2824–2831 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1159-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1159-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation