Elsevier

Nurse Education Today

Volume 24, Issue 6, August 2004, Pages 443-451
Nurse Education Today

The impact of commissioning processes on the delivery of continuing professional education for cancer and palliative care

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2004.04.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Educational commissioning was introduced into nursing and non-medical education in the mid 1990s. However, little research has been undertaken to explore its effect on continuing professional education despite early concerns that it could have a negative impact, especially in relation to more specialist provision such as that required by nurses delivering cancer and palliative care. The in-depth, qualitative study reported in this paper examined the commissioning process and how it was perceived by key stakeholders in one Workforce Development Confederation and the two universities which provided the education for practitioners throughout a local Cancer Network. The study identified failure to address educational needs accurately because too little attention was given to training needs analysis at the level of National Health Service Trusts. Commissioning was dominated by the need to demonstrate value for money at the expense of educational innovation and there was scope for improving communication between stakeholders. In addition scope existed for better collaboration between the two provider universities. Although all respondents voiced the similar criticisms, lecturers, service managers and Trust education leads were more able to suggest solutions to problems than education managers because of their awareness of service needs and the requirements of individual practitioners. The findings of this study cannot be generalised beyond the Cancer Network in which it took place. However, they clearly indicate possible weaknesses in the commissioning process which should be explored in greater depth, in relation to continuing professional education for specialist and non-specialist areas of practice.

Introduction

The system of commissioning nursing and other non-medical education and training was introduced into the National Health Service (NHS) in the mid 1990s in response to Working Paper 10 (1989) which transferred funding from the National Boards to the Department of Health (DoH). Some re-organisation has since taken place and the original title has changed, but the core functions of the workforce development confederations (WDCs) are the same. They collate workforce development plans, identify service needs, ensure that adequate numbers of nurses are recruited and trained and that the content of educational programmes matches service needs.

From the outset there were fears that the commissioning process would hamper service planning. It was suggested that poor quality numerical data would impede ability to forecast requirements (Burke, 1995) and that this aspect of the work would take place at the expense of addressing the needs of existing practitioners for continuing professional education (CPE) (Francis, 1996). In a later paper, Francis and Humphreys (1998) also expressed concern that commissioning would fail to take into account the skills-based nature and content of educational programmes, especially post-qualification. This issue was considered in greater depth by Hudson (1996) who was particularly concerned about the need of the existing workforce to keep abreast of technical advances in care, especially in specialist areas of practice. Taking cancer and palliative care as his exemplar, Hudson (1996) pointed out that the CPE needs of this specialist group would not be met effectively under the new system because numbers would be so small that courses would not prove economically viable at local level. He predicted that unless the CPE needs of small, highly specialist groups of practitioners continued to be met regionally or nationally, they would become increasingly scarce, more fragmented and less satisfactory. As this paper will argue, at least some of these fears have now been realised.

Much has been written about the quality of post-registration courses (see for example Barriball et al., 1992; Pedder, 1998; Furze and Pearcey, 1999) and the need to invest in CPE for health professionals has been reflected in numerous Government policy documents (DoH, 1998; DoH, 1999; DoH, 2000a; National Audit Office 2001). However, little has been written about the effects of the commissioning process itself on the quality and relevance of post-registration nursing education,especially in relation to specialist areas of practice. Moreover, it is difficult to interpret and apply the literature relating to CPE to educational practice because of the lack of agreement concerning the definition of CPE and its aims.

Section snippets

Literature review

One of the most widely accepted definitions of CPE for health professionals is that it should enable them to improve health care outcomes (Green, 1984). However, in the UK this issue seems to have become confused. Early proponents of CPE, whose writing predates the introduction of the educational commissioning process, suggested that its purpose was to ensure that the requirements for professional updating stipulated by the national boards were being met (Bysshe, 1991). Other authors have

The study

The study reported here took place as part of a larger initiative to explore the training needs of the workforce in a Cancer Network in the London area (Kelly et al., 2003). Its purpose was to identify the skills held by the nursing workforce throughout the local Cancer Network, to map the existing educational provision and to identify any factors which appeared to be operating as enablers or barriers to training. The project was a joint initiative between the WDC and the Cancer Network.

Aim

The aim of the arm of the study reported in this paper was to explore the process of educational commissioning and its perceived effectiveness in meeting the service needs of people with cancer throughout one London Cancer Network. The study sought information about how the commissioning process was perceived by key stakeholders within the WDC, the two universities which provided the education for practitioners in relation to cancer and palliative care throughout the Network and educational

Study design

A qualitative, exploratory approach to data collection was considered the most appropriate in view of the dearth of literature concerning the educational commissioning process in general and particular to cancer care (Silverman, 1997) and because qualitative methods are particularly appropriate when a large amount of information is required from a small number of key individuals (Rose, 1994).

Information was sought concerning the nature and relevance of education provision for cancer and

Ethical considerations

Permission to undertake the study was given by the ethics committee serving the local trusts. All participants were assured that the data would be treated in strict confidence and their identity as well as the identity of their institutions would not be disclosed in the final report or publication. All participants received verbal and written information about the project. Written consent was obtained before data collection commenced.

The views of workforce development confederation representatives

Both representatives from the WDC summarised their role as:

Making sure that the required workforce is in place, with educational commissioning responsive to local requirements in line with national policy changes.

A key feature of this role was considered to be maintaining effective working relationships with staff in the trusts and universities. This was regarded as an important function of the senior nurse advisors in the WDCs. However, educational commissioning was not their only function and

Discussion

The views of stakeholders obtained during this in-depth, qualitative study were generally well corroborated. A major problem with commissioning post-registration nursing courses was failure to identify educational needs accurately as a result of insufficient attention being given to TNA at trust level. Commissioning was also dominated by the need to demonstrate value for money at the expense of innovation, a point already made by Francis and Humphreys (1998). In addition, stakeholders

Conclusion

Soon after the introduction of commissioning into nursing education, anxieties were expressed concerning its effects on the provision of CPE,especially for specialist practitioners. This in-depth, qualitative study sought information about how the commissioning process was perceived by key stakeholders in the WDC and the two universities which provided the education for practitioners in relation to cancer and palliative care throughout a local Cancer Network. Shortcomings included failure to

Acknowledgements

We thank the Workforce Development Confederation which provided the financial support for this study.

References (28)

  • P. Shields

    Commissioning post-registration education programmes for health care professionals

    Nurse Education Today

    (2002)
  • Audit Commission, 2001. Hidden talents. Education, Training and Development for Healthcare Staff in NHS Trusts. Audit...
  • K.L. Barriball et al.

    Continuing professional education for qualified nurses. A review of the literature

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (1992)
  • L. Burke

    Political principles in action: a critical analysis of education and training. Working paper 10 and its implications for nurse education

    Nurse Education Today

    (1995)
  • J. Bysshe

    PREPP and TNA: Where's the catch?

    Nursing

    (1991)
  • Cancer Research UK, 2003. Cancer Research UK Incidence Cancer Statistics. Cancer Research UK,...
  • M. Courtney

    A study of the teaching and learning of the biological sciences in nurse education

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (1991)
  • Department of Health, 1989. Working for Patients: Education and Training. Working Paper 10. Stationary office,...
  • Department of Health, 1998. Quality in the NHS. A first class service. Stationary Office,...
  • Department of Health, 1999. Making a Difference. Stationary Office,...
  • Department of Health, 2000a. The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform. Stationary Office,...
  • Department of Health, 2000b. National Health Service Cancer Plan. Stationary Office,...
  • B. Francis et al.

    Devolution or centralization. Differences in the development of nurse education commissioning policy among UK nations

    Nurse Education Today

    (1998)
  • G. Furze et al.

    Continuing education in nursing: a review of the literature

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (1999)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text