Elsevier

Health & Place

Volume 13, Issue 2, June 2007, Pages 356-367
Health & Place

Factors affecting place of death in Western Australia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.03.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Despite the growing international interest in place of death and its relationship to healthcare policy, virtually nothing is known about where people die in Australia. To address this gap our study employs a longitudinal, population-based retrospective cohort study of people who died in Western Australia over a 30-month period. Mortality, morbidity and palliative care service data sets from the Western Australian Data Linkage System were examined to provide demographic and disease-specific characteristics and healthcare service use in the last year of life for the 26 882 people who died during this time. The main outcome variables of the study were accommodation setting at the time of death (usual place of residence, hospital, hospice, residential aged care facility and other) and specialist palliative care use (hospital, home-based, both or neither). Over half of Western Australians died in hospital, but as people age there is an increasing tendency to die in their usual place of residence, which may be a private residence or an aged care facility. People who accessed community-based specialist palliative care had a seven times higher chance of dying in their usual place of residence. Importantly, this information is provided, not just for cancer deaths, as has been the practice to date, but for a range of other painful and life-limiting conditions considered amenable to palliative care. The unique population data on palliative care service use, made possible by the data linkage system, provides a basis for planning health services and policies.

Introduction

Where people die is of importance, not just because individual choice is highly valued in contemporary society, but also for the purpose of healthcare planning. With escalating medical costs associated with the last year of life, and often the last weeks of life (Lubitz et al., 2003) helping people to remain in their homes to die may achieve the two outcomes of cost containment and patient choice. A number of studies have focussed upon preferences for place of death and, to a lesser extent, the provision of population-based data for place of death for people dying of cancer. However, very few studies provide broad demographics and service use data for large populations and none have provided even minimal Australian data for the last 10 years, a gap our study seeks to address.

When asked where they would prefer to die, the majority of people express a wish to die at home (Hays et al., 2001; Tang and McCorkle, 2003; Tiernan et al., 2002) though a recent study has also shown a stronger than anticipated preference for a hospice death (Thomas et al., 2004). The experience of caring for family members at home has also been noted as more positive for both families and patients, though this is dependent on the provision of supportive home-centred care (Catalán-Fernández et al., 1991). Despite these preferences only one-half of patients achieve their wish to die in a place of their choice (Ashby and Wakefield, 1993; Carroll, 1998; Tiernan et al., 2002) and most patients die away from home (Tang and McCorkle, 2001).

Place of death is related to, and affected by, various demographic factors. Children are more likely to die at home than adults. In the United Kingdom (UK), Higginson and Thompson (2003) found that 52% of children aged 0–15 years with cancer died at home, whereas 30% of those aged 16–24 years died at home. In adults, the evidence on age and gender varies with both women and older people less likely to die at home in the UK (Gatrell et al., 2003; Higginson et al., 1998) but more likely to die at home in Italy (Constantini et al., 2000; De Conno et al., 1996) and Canada (Burge et al., 2003). Patients are also more likely to die at home than in hospital if they are not single (Constantini et al., 2000; De Conno et al., 1996) and live outside of an urban centre or in a rural area (Burge et al., 2003; Catalán-Fernández et al., 1991). Condition-specific factors also influence place of death. In an Australian study of patients who died of acute myeloid leukemia, none died at home (Maddocks et al., 1994). Other studies have found that patients with cancer are less likely to die at home if they have malignancies of the lymphatic or haematological system (Bruera et al., 2003; Higginson et al., 1998). Population data from the UK in 1994 indicated that 27% of deaths from cancer occurred at home and that this figure had changed very little over the previous 10 years (Higginson et al., 1998). This appears to be an international trend with various studies over the past 15 years of patients with cancer illustrating that the minority of patients die at home (Table 1). There is a paucity of data to provide an Australian comparison, though South Australian figures from a population-based study are among the lowest at 18% in 1990 and 20% in 1993 (Hunt and McCaul, 1998).

A comprehensive review of literature published in 1998 found that many people who wish to die at home are unable to do so (Carroll, 1998). The kinds of health services available are likely to influence this outcome; where palliative care is available, in the form of hospice and/or homecare services, patients are more likely to die at home than in hospital. Hunt and McCaul (1998) found that Australian patients with cancer who died at home had higher levels of hospice care (59% in 1990 and 73% in 1993) than those who died in hospitals and nursing homes (41% in 1990 and 50% in 1993). A United States of America (US) study found that hospice patients were more likely to die at home than non-hospice patients, especially when they received home-based care (Moinpour and Polissar, 1989). Supportive professional healthcare within the home is associated with a greater likelihood of dying at home elsewhere as well. Reports of homecare programs for patients with cancer in Italy, Taiwan and Japan show generally higher proportions of patients dying at home (86%, 69% and 43%, respectively) than is usual for this population (De Conno et al., 1996; Fukui et al., 2003; Tang, 2002). Patients who die at home tend to have more home visits from a palliative care team than those who died in hospital (McWhinney et al., 1995) and patients with cancer who die where they wish make greater use of homecare services than patients who do not die where they wish (Tang and McCorkle, 2003).

The studies reviewed here have two limitations. First, almost all the studies were restricted to patients with cancer and provided no information about people who died from other causes. Second, many of the studies generalized the results from samples to the population although regional differences have been identified (Constantini et al., 2000; Higginson et al., 1998) and make such generalizations tenuous. Our study overcame these two limitations by including people who died from a range of causes and by using the whole of population data. This approach was enabled by using the Western Australian (WA) Data Linkage System, which links together data over a period of 20 years from a variety of health administrative data sets, and relates these to individual people (Holman et al., 1999). Studies supported by the WA Record Linkage System are more cost effective compared with studies that require primary data collection and data entry (Brameld et al., 1999). Our study uses Mortality and Hospital Morbidity data sets as well as service use data supplied by Silver Chain Nursing Association, the agency that provides at least 90% of community-based palliative care in Western Australia, a state of Australia which in 2001 had a population of 1 831 998 people (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2003). By describing the demographics of all Western Australian people who died over a 2.5-year period the study provides unprecedented data that predicts place of death in this population. Furthermore, the study describes the characteristics of a population-based subset of people considered amenable to palliative care and investigates the relationship between place of death and the use of palliative care services.

In the metropolitan area of Western Australia there are approximately 50 public and 40 private palliative care beds in hospices and palliative care units (Palliative Care Advisory Group, 2005). Regional and remote areas are serviced on a needs basis; however, it is important to note the geographical isolation and small population in regional Western Australia. Palliative care was provided within the community to 4 070 people during a 2.5-year study period (McNamara et al., 2004).

Section snippets

Method

The study used a longitudinal, population-based, retrospective cohort design for the period 1 July 2000–31 December 2002. It identified the people who died in Western Australia and a subset of people who died of one of 10 conditions considered by experts to be amenable to palliative care (Rosenwax et al., 2005). The ten conditions were cancer, chronic heart failure, chronic renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease, chronic liver failure, Parkinson's disease,

Results

During the 2.5-year study period 26 882 people died in Western Australia (excluding foetal deaths, deaths at less than 1 day of age, and missing records due to coronial enquiries and missing information on the death certificate). Of this population 48.6% died in hospital, 35.8% died in their usual place of residence (private residence=20.2% and residential aged care=15.6%), 5.5% died in hospice and 6.3% died in some ‘other’ place. People who died in a residential aged care facility comprised two

Discussion

When Fordham and Dowick (1999) investigated, through an extensive literature review, whether care of the dying had improved, they found that this was probably not the case when considered on any large scale. Their finding is, in part, associated with the limitations of the studies they considered, most of which were small in scale and restricted to cancer deaths. While our study did not consider directly whether care of the dying is improving, by considering a large population of all people who

Limitations of the study

While the general findings of this study provide much needed descriptive data, the study was not without limitations. Like other studies utilizing death certificates it was reliant on the accuracy with which the causes of death were recorded. There is evidence that some conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease (Hoyert, 1996) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Mannino et al., 1997) may be under-reported on death certificates. Death certificate data will also not address other factors that

Conclusion

While further studies need to be done on the actual preferences regarding place of death, as has been noted elsewhere (Higginson and Sen-Gupta, 2000), our study provides an important first step in documenting where people die and how the provision of palliative care service impacts upon the setting of death. Importantly, this information is provided not just for cancer deaths, as has been the practice to date, but for a range of other painful and life-limiting conditions considered amenable to

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor D’Arcy Holman, Dr. Janine Calver, Dr. Marie Blackmore and Ms Sheridan Howard for research support. We acknowledge the cooperation of Ms Di Rosman from the Western Australia Data Linkage System and Dr. Gill Lewin from the Silver Chain Nursing Association. This research was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Palliative Care Research Grants Program.

References (44)

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2005. Australian Hospital Statistics 2003–2004. Health Services Series No....
  • F. Burge et al.

    Trends in the place of death of cancer patients, 1992–1997

    Canadian Medical Association Journal

    (2003)
  • P. Cantwell et al.

    Predictors of home death in palliative care cancer patients

    Journal of Palliative Care

    (2000)
  • D. Carroll

    An audit of place of death of cancer patients in a semi-rural Scottish practice

    Palliative Medicine

    (1998)
  • J. Catalán-Fernández et al.

    Dying of cancer: the place of death and family circumstances

    Medical Care

    (1991)
  • M. Constantini et al.

    Geographical variations of place of death among Italian communities suggest an inappropriate hospital use in the terminal phase of cancer disease

    Public Health

    (2000)
  • H. Dharmasena et al.

    Palliative care for patients with non-malignant disease: will hospital physicians refer?

    Palliative Medicine

    (2001)
  • S. Fordham et al.

    Is care of the dying improving? The contribution of specialist and non-specialist to palliative care

    Family Practice

    (1999)
  • S. Fukui et al.

    Determinants of the place of death among terminally ill cancer patients under home hospice care in Japan

    Palliative Medicine

    (2003)
  • A.C. Gatrell et al.

    Place of death: Analysis of cancer deaths in part of North West England

    Journal of Public Health Medicine

    (2003)
  • Glover, J., Tenant, S., 2002. Remote areas statistical geography in Australia: notes on the Accessibility\Remoteness...
  • Hayman, N., 2003. Indigenous health today. RACP News 22,...
  • Cited by (62)

    • Earlier Initiation of Community-Based Palliative Care Is Associated With Fewer Unplanned Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Presentations in the Final Months of Life: A Population-Based Study Among Cancer Decedents

      2018, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cost analysis of the U.S., Belgium, Canada, England, Germany, The Netherlands, and Norway, shows between 33% and 50% of health-specific purchasing power parity–adjusted hospital expenditure in the last six months of life, is accounted for in the month before death.11 Previous work has shown a similar scenario among cancer patients in Australia,12,13 where people are likely to spend time in hospital in the lead up to death and are most likely to die in hospital.14 This is despite a preference for dying at home15–19 and for receiving out-of-hospital palliative care.8–12,20

    • Adult mortality in sub-saharan Africa, Zambia: Where do adults die?

      2017, SSM - Population Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most people prefer to die at home, however, majority of the deaths occur in a health facility and not in the preferred place of death (Black et al., 2016; De Roo et al., 2014; Escobar Pinzon et al., 2011; Gomes, Calanzani, Gysels, Hall, and Higginson, 2013; Gomes et al., 2011). The preference of a home death is supported by the notion that an individual can die peacefully in a dignified manner in the presence of the family or close relations (Gomes et al., 2011; Gomes & Higginson, 2006; Kinoshita et al., 2014; McNamara & Rosenwax, 2007). In addition, the cost of hospitalization is minimized (Pollock, 2015).

    • Unpacking the impact of older adults' home death on family care-givers' experiences of home

      2016, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      Evidence emerging from a number of systematic reviews suggests that home-based palliative care not only results in greater carer and patient satisfaction, but reduces the length of hospital stays, so increasing the likelihood of home death (e.g. Finaly et al. 2002; Gomes and Higginson, 2006; Shepperd et al. 2011). However, whilst a desire to increase patient and family choice may, in part, underpin this shifting agenda, commentators also maintain that the drive to increase the numbers of home deaths cannot be entirely divorced from concerns around cost containment (Macnamara and Rosenwax, 2007; Seymour et al. 2007). Evidence about the benefits of home care at end of life is also conflicting, although recent reviews suggest that the holistic well-being of the dying person may be greater at home (Donovan et al. 2011; Higginson et al. 2013).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text