Elsevier

Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Volume 73, 30 June 2014, Pages 50-62
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Oral transmucosal drug delivery for pediatric use

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2013.08.011Get rights and content

Abstract

The formulation of medicines for children remains a challenge. An ideal pediatric formulation must allow accurate dose administration and be in a dosage form that can be handled by the target age group. It is also important to consider the choices and the amount of excipients used in the formulation for this vulnerable age group. Although oral formulations are generally acceptable to most pediatric patients, they are not suitable for drugs with poor oral bioavailability or when a rapid clinical effect is required. In recent years, oral transmucosal delivery has emerged as an attractive route of administration for pediatric patients. With this route of administration, a drug is absorbed through the oral mucosa, therefore bypassing hepatic first pass metabolism and thus avoiding drug degradation or metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract. The high blood flow and relatively high permeability of the oral mucosa allow a quick onset of action to be achieved. It is a simple and non-invasive route of drug administration. However, there are several barriers that need to be overcome in the development of oral transmucosal products. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current development of oral transmucosal delivery specifically for the pediatric population in order to achieve systemic drug delivery. The anatomical and physiological properties of the oral mucosa of infants and young children are carefully examined. The different dosage forms and formulation strategies that are suitable for young patients are discussed.

Introduction

The development of formulations for pediatrics is a challenging field of research. Pediatric patients include newborns, infants, children and adolescents. The upper age limit used to define pediatric population varies among different countries, usually including adolescents up to 18 or 21 years of age. The different age groups have different physiological and pharmacokinetic consideration, and their ability to handle formulation is also vastly different [1], [2].

Oral transmucosal drug delivery is an attractive route of administration to achieve systemic drug delivery for pediatric patients. Absorption of drugs across the oral mucosa can bypass hepatic first pass metabolism and similarly avoid drug degradation in the gastrointestinal tract. Because of the abundant blood flow to and the relatively high permeability of the oral mucosa, fast onset of drug action may readily be achieved [3], [4]. This is particularly desirable during an emergency situation when a rapid clinical response is required [5]. It is also a useful route of administration during a state of patient unconsciousness, when swallowing is impaired. Compared to parenteral administration, delivery of drugs via the oral cavity is relatively simple and non-invasive. Medication can be easily administered by the parents or carers of young patient without special technical skills, although the cooperation of the patient is sometimes necessary. Oral cavity delivery may also avoid the risk of blood borne infections or injury associated with parenteral administration. In addition, the absence of needle administration and the pain associated with this can also improve compliance in young children.

A drug candidate should possess the necessary physicochemical properties before it is considered for oral transmucosal delivery development. These include good lipophilicity and water solubility at physiological pH, as well as high potency. In addition, the drug must not cause any local irritation in the oral cavity. Apart from the intrinsic drug properties, there should also be a clear clinical benefit in developing a product for this route of delivery. To achieve systemic drug delivery through the oral mucosa effectively, several physiological barriers presented by the oral cavity must be overcome, namely the intrinsic enzyme activity, the relative permeability of the oral mucosa and the small fluid volume for dissolution and absorption. A mucoadhesive drug delivery system is a commonly employed strategy to increase the contact time of formulation at the site of absorption and also minimize any saliva wash-out effect which may lead to involuntary swallowing [6]. For these reasons, apart from the conventional tablet and liquid dosage forms available, newer dosage forms such as oral thin films and wafers are being developed. Oral transmucosal dosage forms must also allow for accurate and convenient dose measurement as the dose of all drugs varies with age and the weight of children. Other considerations include the ability of young patients to handle the particular dosage form, the physiological differences of the oral cavity between the adults and children, the palatability of the formulation and the cost effectiveness.

Buccal and sublingual routes, which are the two most common oral transmucosal routes of administration, are focused in this review. The oral transmucosal delivery systems have been reviewed recently in a number of publications without the specific consideration of the age of patients [3], [4], [7], [8], [9], [10]. The development of buccal and sublingual formulations for systemic delivery targeting the pediatric population is the primary focus of this review.

Section snippets

Anatomy and physiology of the oral mucosal

Drug absorption through the oral mucosal surface is potentially effective because it is generally rich in blood supply, providing rapid drug transport to the systemic circulation and avoiding degradation or metabolism by gastric juice, gastrointestinal enzymes and first pass hepatic metabolism. The outer quarter to one-third of the oral mucosa is comprised of closely compacted, squamous stratified epithelial cells (Fig. 1). Beneath the epithelium are the basement membrane, lamina propria (an

Mucus

The surface of the oral mucosa is coated by a thin layer of mucus which presents one of the barriers to oral transmucosal delivery. Mucus is part of the saliva secreted by the salivary glands. The key component of mucus is mucin which belongs to a class of amphoteric macromolecular glycoprotein. Mucin only accounts for a small proportion (1–5%) of the entire mucus constitutes [8]. At normal oral mucosal pH, the mucus network is negatively charged due to the sialic acid and sulfate residues, and

Drug selection

Low drug loading, including its molecular size and dose, limits the number of drug candidates that are suitable for development into oral transmucosal formulations. To improve the bioavailability following buccal or sublingual administration, several criteria of drug properties must be met in the first place. Table 2 summarizes the physicochemical properties of selected drugs that are investigated or used for buccal and/or sublingual delivery.

To identify suitable drug candidates for buccal or

Formulation consideration and strategies

Pediatric patients as a group include neonates, infants, children and adolescents and each of these subgroups encompasses a variety of ages, body size and weights. With changes in the age of patients, there are also changes in the ability to handle different dosage forms. For example, younger patients are more likely to experience dysphagia, which is less common in the adult population. In general, small volume liquid medicines are suitable for most ages whereas solid dosage forms are more

Clinical benefits

Since the buccal or sublingual formulations are associated with higher cost of manufacture, there must be a clear clinical benefit to make such a development worthwhile. For systemic drug delivery, the oral route of administration is generally the preferred route of administration due to its non-invasive nature and low production costs of the respective medication. When the oral route is not suitable, a safe alternative route must be considered. One of the key advantages of buccal or sublingual

Future development and conclusions

There is a lack of suitable and safe formulations for pediatric populations. The difficulties in developing pediatric formulation are attributed to the diverse characteristics within this patient group with wide varying needs. Oral transmucosal delivery has several important advantages over the more conventional administration routes for children such as the oral and parenteral routes. Before a drug is investigated for the oral transmucosal formulation development, the physicochemical

Declaration of interest

ICKW is the founder and a director of Therakind. Therakind is a spin-out company of the UCL School of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust and UCL Institute of Child Health with funding from commercial and private investors. Therakind receives Royalty from ViroPharma (the manufacturer of Buccolam®) for the development of Buccolam®.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Seed Funding Programme for Basic Research, The University of Hong Kong (201112159008) and Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme, Hong Kong Research Grants Council (PF11-06999) for financial support.

References (157)

  • K. Ono et al.

    Relationship of the unstimulated whole saliva flow rate and salivary gland size estimated by magnetic resonance image in healthy young humans

    Arch. Oral Biol.

    (2006)
  • M. Sonesson et al.

    Minor salivary gland secretion in children and adults

    Arch. Oral Biol.

    (2003)
  • S. Chaushu et al.

    Age-dependent deficiency in saliva and salivary antibodies secretion in Down's syndrome

    Arch. Oral Biol.

    (2007)
  • A. Hidas et al.

    Oral health status, salivary flow rate and salivary quality in children, adolescents and young adults with ADHD

    Arch. Oral Biol.

    (2011)
  • A. Majorana et al.

    Oral mucosal lesions in children from 0 to 12 years old: ten years' experience

    Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.

    (2010)
  • J. Xiang et al.

    Transbuccal delivery of 2′,3′-dideoxycytidine: in vitro permeation study and histological investigation

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2002)
  • V.H. Deneer et al.

    Buccal transport of flecainide and sotalol: effect of a bile salt and ionization state

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2002)
  • H.M. Nielsen et al.

    Nicotine permeability across the buccal TR146 cell culture model and porcine buccal mucosa in vitro: effect of pH and concentration

    Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2002)
  • R. Birudaraj et al.

    Buccal permeation of buspirone: mechanistic studies on transport pathways

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2005)
  • S. Bredenberg et al.

    In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a new sublingual tablet system for rapid oromucosal absorption using fentanyl citrate as the active substance

    Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2003)
  • J.A. Nicolazzo et al.

    Buccal penetration enhancers—how do they really work?

    J. Control. Release

    (2005)
  • Y. Sudhakar et al.

    Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery—a promising option for orally less efficient drugs

    J. Control. Release

    (2006)
  • N. Salamat-Miller et al.

    The use of mucoadhesive polymers in buccal drug delivery

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2005)
  • V. Fabiano et al.

    Paediatric pharmacology: remember the excipients

    Pharmacol. Res.

    (2011)
  • K. Arulanantham et al.

    Central nervous system toxicity associated with ingestion of propylene glycol

    J. Pediatr.

    (1978)
  • W.J. Brown et al.

    Fatal benzyl alcohol poisoning in a neonatal intensive care unit

    Lancet

    (1982)
  • A.H. Shojaei et al.

    Mechanisms of buccal mucoadhesion of novel copolymers of acrylic acid and polyethylene glycol monomethylether monomethacrylate

    J. Control. Release

    (1997)
  • B.S. Lele et al.

    Mucoadhesive drug carriers based on complexes of poly(acrylic acid) and PEGylated drugs having hydrolysable PEG-anhydride-drug linkages

    J. Control. Release

    (2000)
  • V. Grabovac et al.

    Comparison of the mucoadhesive properties of various polymers

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2005)
  • N.A. Fefelova et al.

    Mucoadhesive interactions of amphiphilic cationic copolymers based on [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2007)
  • S. Rossi et al.

    Characterization of chitosan hydrochloride-mucin interaction by means of viscosimetric and turbidimetric measurements

    Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2000)
  • K. Albrecht et al.

    Comparative in vivo mucoadhesion studies of thiomer formulations using magnetic resonance imaging and fluorescence detection

    J. Control. Release

    (2006)
  • A. Bernkop-Schnurch

    Thiomers: a new generation of mucoadhesive polymers

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2005)
  • L. Casettari et al.

    Biomedical applications of amino acid-modified chitosans: a review

    Biomaterials

    (2012)
  • V.M. Leitner et al.

    Thiolated polymers: evidence for the formation of disulphide bonds with mucus glycoproteins

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2003)
  • M. Roldo et al.

    Mucoadhesive thiolated chitosans as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery: synthesis and in vitro evaluation

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2004)
  • C. Bies et al.

    Lectin-mediated drug targeting: history and applications

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2004)
  • M.A. Clark et al.

    Lectin-mediated mucosal delivery of drugs and microparticles

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2000)
  • E.M.M. Del Valle

    Cyclodextrins and their uses: a review

    Process. Biochem.

    (2004)
  • S. Senel et al.

    Drug permeation enhancement via buccal route: possibilities and limitations

    J. Control. Release

    (2001)
  • S. Senel et al.

    In vitro studies on enhancing effect of sodium glycocholate on transbuccal permeation of morphine hydrochloride

    J. Control. Release

    (1998)
  • V.H.L. Lee

    Protease inhibitors and penetration enhancers as approaches to modify peptide absorption

    J. Control. Release

    (1990)
  • L.W. Hsu et al.

    Elucidating the signaling mechanism of an epithelial tight-junction opening induced by chitosan

    Biomaterials

    (2012)
  • V. Dodane et al.

    Effect of chitosan on epithelial permeability and structure

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1999)
  • C. Souto et al.

    A comparative study of the utility of two superdisintegrants in microcrystalline cellulose pellets prepared by extrusion-spheronization

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2005)
  • A.B. Nair et al.

    In vitro techniques to evaluate buccal films

    J. Control. Release

    (2013)
  • R.P. Dixit et al.

    Oral strip technology: overview and future potential

    J. Control. Release

    (2009)
  • C. Giovino et al.

    Development and characterisation of chitosan films impregnated with insulin loaded PEG-b-PLA nanoparticles (NPs): a potential approach for buccal delivery of macromolecules

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2012)
  • Y. Kohda et al.

    Controlled release of lidocaine hydrochloride from buccal mucosa adhesive films with solid dispersion

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1997)
  • N.A. Nafee et al.

    Mucoadhesive buccal patches of miconazole nitrate: in vitro/in vivo performance and effect of ageing

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (112)

    • Fast dissolving films - an innovative approach for delivering nutraceuticals

      2023, Industrial Application of Functional Foods, Ingredients and Nutraceuticals: Extraction, Processing and Formulation of Bioactive Compounds
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This review is part of the Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews theme issue on “Drug delivery and the paediatric population: where are we at?”.

    View full text