Costs of palliative care in the community, in hospitals and in hospices in the UK

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-8428(99)00023-2Get rights and content

Introduction

The provision of health care in the UK is undergoing significant change as the 1997 White Paper ‘The new NHS. Modern. Dependable’ [1] is enacted in law and implemented in practice. The reforms replace purchasing with commissioning as they seek to reconfigure the NHS around a model of integrated care as opposed to internal markets. The research reported in this paper was carried out before this shift. However there is not evidence to suggest that pressures on health care resources in the UK will decrease and all health care decision makers will need to be aware of both the effects and the costs of alternative health care expenditures [2]. Knowledge of the costs was particularly important in the setting of contract prices by providers and in their appraisal by purchasers [3] and is likely to remain crucial under a commissioing approach.

There has been no patient specific costing of palliative care services. A MEDLINE search in 1995 failed to identify any relevant studies appraising the costs and/or effects of palliative care in alternative settings. One of the obstacles to accurate costing is the manpower and financial resource requirements necessary for the collection of patient specific data. This study provides an excellent opportunity to monitor resource usage by patients receiving palliative care in different settings. As well as resource usage the study collected data on quality of life, satisfaction with care, anxiety and depression and pain. Data were collected from patients and lay carers as well as health care professionals. Findings in areas other than resource use will be reported elsewhere [1].

Palliative care has always been a feature of health care. However, it is only in recent years that the specialist provision of such care has developed. From its beginnings in the late 1960s the modern hospice movement in Britain has grown very rapidly. By 1998 there were 215 UK hospices with adult inpatient facilities. In addition there are over 700 specialist palliative care services in the UK and Ireland (numbers compiled from 1998 ‘Directory of Hospice Services’). Palliative care is also provided in non-specialist settings, such as hospitals, by generic health care providers.

Government support for the development of palliative care has been most tangible in ring-fenced allocations of monies, beginning in 1990. Ostensibly this ring-fencing was designed to support the charitable component of many palliative care services but it was also designed to help these services adjust to the demands of the then new regulated market in health care [4]. From April 1994 this ring-fencing of money ceased and purchasers were then free to procure palliative care services from any source deemed appropriate.

It appears likely that new providers will enter the market. NHS hospitals, community trusts and private nursing homes are possible future competitors for existing services. In this context information about costs is of considerable value. The provision of palliative care is complex both in terms of the range of needs it responds to, the variation in treatment possible and the challenge of measuring effectiveness. It appears to be vital that providers and purchasers are clear what the breakdown of costs is, not least because this would defend against a straightforward reduction in expenditure through contracting for lower cost tenders that might not contain the necessary component parts for holistic palliative care.

This paper presents analysis of the costs of palliative care in the community setting and identifies salient patient characteristics that are associated with increased costs of care. The importance of taking full cognisance of the role of carers, often members of the patients own family, is emphasised. The paper continues with an examination of the costs of palliative care in inpatient settings, both hospitals and hospices. At the outset it is crucial to note that in offering figures about costs in different settings we are not seeking to imply that we have the basis for a comparison of costs, still less any route to a measure of cost-effectiveness. Two features of palliative care are crucial here: (1) It is likely that any individual would receive care from two or possibly three care settings during the palliative phase of their illness and so purchasers will need to have information about each setting. (2) Although it may be the same person receiving care in each setting their needs will change. With the optimum allocation of staff and with these staff having received appropriate training a wide range of services can be, and are, offered in the community. However the overall nature of services offered in a hospital or a hospice are different. One can not compare because one is not comparing like with like, either in terms of needs or services.

Section snippets

Study design

During the last 6 months of 1994 patients were recruited from eight district health authorities (DHAs) within two regional health authorities (four DHAs in each) within England and Wales. Initially all DHAs were classified according to age, ethnicity and social economic indicators. RHAs were then selected on the basis that they contained both DHAs with a high proportion of ethnic minority groups, but resembled England and Wales with regard to other factors, and DHAs which resembled England and

Costs of palliative care in the community

In all 212 community-based patients took part in the study but baseline resource and cost information was only available for 210. In addition to these, 202 eligible patients were excluded. The major reasons for exclusion were cognitive impairment (47), refusal by patient (55) and the patients general practitioner considering the patient was too ill to participate (38). Baseline characteristics of all patients, included and excluded, are detailed in Table 1.

The major difference between included

The costs of informal care

One problem with developing costs of care in the community for this, as for other groups, is the extent to which care is provided by informal carers such as family members. There is a danger that this contribution will not be factored in when we consider the overall picture and, in consequence, the relative picture on costs will be distorted. While it is true that there are costs to informal carers when the person they care for is in hospital or in a hospice, costs relating to travelling to

Analysis of costs of palliative care in inpatient settings

In this part of the paper we report on the costs of palliative care services provided to patients taking part in the study in hospital and hospice inpatient units. Costs of inpatient stays are calculated and comparisons of costs are made between patients with different characteristics, e.g. age groups, main diagnosis, WHO score at admission to the study. We have not attempted to replicate our analysis with community patients because: (1) Attrition rates were higher in inpatient settings and

Discussion

This study provides a rich data set for analysis of a variety of issues in the provision of palliative care. In this paper analysis of service provision and resource use cost has been conducted to assess the magnitude of service usage by patients and the corresponding resource use cost. This analysis is useful to both the providers of palliative care in the community in terms of planning and budget setting, and to purchasers or commissioners of palliative care. In addition future research

Conclusions and policy implications

Consistent with other work on the estimation of costs in palliative care we offer a partial and preliminary picture. The single most compelling observation is of the complexity of need and the variety of provision in this field. In the general analysis of cost data in relation to health such observations might be considered homilies—all need is complex and in almost all cases provision comes from a variety of sources. However palliative care has organisational complexities and problems in

Reviewer

This article was reviewed by Prof David R. Jones, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester, 22–28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, England, UK.

Acknowledgements

The Study was funded by the UK Government’s Department of Health. The paper, though, reflects the views of its authors. We are grateful to the other members of the York Palliative Care Study Group, to the project’s steering group, to our research nurse data gatherers, and to Ken Wright from the Centre for Health Economics, York. Our thanks also to the large numbers of patients, carers and health and social care professionals who gave their time and interest to this study.

Dr Neil Small is Professor of Community and Primary Care at Bradford University. His research interests include the impact of policy change on service provision in Palliative care.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (29)

  • D.S. Greer et al.

    An alternative in terminal care: results of the National Hospice Study

    J. Chronic Dis.

    (1986)
  • Secretary of State for Health (1997). The new NHS. Modern. Dependable. London, Stationary...
  • I. Halliday

    The NHS Transformed

    (1992)
  • D. Clark et al.

    Contracting for palliative care

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1995)
  • D. Clark

    Partners in Care? Hospices and Health Authorities

    (1993)
  • Netten A, Smart S. Unit Cost of Community Care 1992/93. Canterbury, University of Kent, Personal Social Services...
  • Graves D, Nash A. A friendship that inspires hope. A study of Macmillan nurses' working patterns. Professional Nurse...
  • Abel-Smith B. The Evaluation of Health Care Costs: how did we get there? In: Health Care Reform: the will to change....
  • Scitovsky A. Medical Care in the Last Twelve Months of Life. Milbank Q. 1988;...
  • Anderson J, King M, Lapsley I, Llewellyn S, Sladden S, Tierney A. The costs and quality of Palliative Care. Report for...
  • M.F. Drummond et al.

    Methodological issues in economic assessments of new therapies. The case of colony-stimulating factors

    Pharmacoeconomics

    (1994)
  • P. Armitage et al.

    Statistical Methods in Medical Research

    (1987)
  • D. Kidder

    Hospice services and cost savings in the last weeks of life

  • Parker G. With Due Care and Attention: A Review of Research on Informal Care. Family Policy Studies Centre Occasional...
  • Cited by (22)

    • Resource Consumption and Costs of Palliative Care Services in Spain: A Multicenter Prospective Study

      2006, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      This has been seen mainly as a dramatic reduction in the inappropriate use of acute hospital beds and hospital casualty rooms, together with the promotion of home-based care and alternative services. Also, the provision of palliative care beds has a lower unit cost compared with conventional medical beds.7–12 Based on this received wisdom, we designed a descriptive-observational, longitudinal, cohort study.

    • Real-world evidence use in assessments of cancer drugs by NICE

      2020, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Dr Neil Small is Professor of Community and Primary Care at Bradford University. His research interests include the impact of policy change on service provision in Palliative care.

    View full text