Clinical assessments as predictors of one year survival after hospitalization: Implications for prognostic stratification,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(88)90132-1Get rights and content

Abstract

In clinical trials measuring the short term survival of patients, prognostic stratification is important to avoid susceptibility bias. Demographic and disease specific clinical features are commonly used to established similarity, but these may not insure prognostic comparability. To identify the generic predictors of one year survival after hospitalization, a cohort of 559 patients admitted to the medical service at New York Hospital was studied.

Among all of the clinical and demographic information available at the time of admission, only three were independent predictors of the time until death: functional ability, severity of illness and extent of comorbid disease. The overall one year survival rate was 66%. Six subgroups composed of patients with different combinations of the predictors of prognosis had mortality rates ranging from 97% to 14%. Illness severity was a predictor only in the less functional patients, and only severe comorbidity was associated with a decreased survival after taking into account functional ability and illness severity.

Prospective estimates of severity of illness, functional ability and extent of comorbidity can be used to stratify a diverse group of patients according to their probability of one year survival after hospitalization.

References (33)

  • F.E. Harrell

    The LOGIST Procedure

  • F.E. Harrell

    The PHGLM Procedure

  • F.E. Harrell et al.

    Regression models for prognostic prediction: advantages, problems and suggested solutions

    Cancer Treat Rep

    (1985)
  • R. Peto et al.

    Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient I. Introduction and designs

    Br J Cancer

    (1976)
  • R. Simon

    Patient subsets and variation in therapeutic efficacy

    Br J Clin Pharmac

    (1982)
  • Cited by (70)

    • The alertness, gait and mortality of severely ill patients at two months after admission to a resource poor sub-Saharan hospital - Why is post-discharge surveillance not routine everywhere?

      2016, European Journal of Internal Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      A number of other scores also based solely on physical examination, but that also include functional status have recently been reported [13–15]. In addition to severity of illness and functional capacity, co-morbid conditions are also known to influence patient outcome [16]. The impact of presenting complaints on patient outcome has only recently been studied [17], with few reports from sub-Saharan Africa.

    • The intermountain risk score predicts incremental age-specific long-term survival and life expectancy

      2011, Translational Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although those prognostic scores achieved areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve of c = 0.68–0.84, IMRS is equal or better with areas under the curve of c = 0.83–0.90 in prior work1 and by age decade herein with c = 0.80–0.88 for patients up to 70 years old. Uniquely, IMRS can be run in almost any medical facility in the world, unlike other risk scores6-9 that require data that are not routinely collected in clinical practice. IMRS can be applied in tertiary-care academic centers and can be used in underserved regions, rural areas, and developing countries where more advanced diagnostic tests are not available and where physicians with advanced specialized training may not be present.

    • Who will be sicker in the morning? Changes in the Simple Clinical Score the day after admission and the subsequent outcomes of acutely ill unselected medical patients

      2011, European Journal of Internal Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Simple Clinical Score (SCS) accurately predicts the risk of death over 30 days [1]. The score identifies severity of illness, functional status and co-morbid conditions — the three factors recognized as the major determinants of mortality [2]. Independent external validation has confirmed that it has an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 85% for the prediction of in-hospital mortality [3,4].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This paper was developed during a study funded by Contract Number 240-84-0057 awarded by the Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, MD 20857. The conclusions presented do not necessarily represent those of the Federal Government.

    ☆☆

    Presented in part at the national meeting of the American Federation for Clinical Research, Washington, D.C., 1986.

    1

    Dr Charlson is a Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Faculty Scholar in General Internal Medicine.

    View full text