Skip to main content
Log in

Initial development of the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 21 September 2013

Abstract

Background

We previously identified published scales for symptom assessment in pediatric cancer patients. The objectives of this study were to identify if any of these scales were suitable for use or adaptation as a self-report symptom screening tool, and if not, to begin the process of creating a new tool.

Methods

A focus group of ten healthcare professionals with expertise in pediatric cancer symptom management and a patient advocate were convened. First, the group identified the optimal properties of a symptom screening tool for pediatric cancer patients. Next, the previously identified symptom assessment scales were evaluated against these properties. As none of the existing scales were adequate for symptom screening, a nominal group technique was used to identify the most important symptoms for inclusion in a new symptom screening tool.

Results

Optimal properties of a symptom screening tool included minimal respondent burden, inclusion of 15 items or less, and inclusion of the most burdensome symptoms. None of the previously identified scales were adequate because they lacked content validity and were too long or would be too hard for children to understand. Nominal group technique identified 15 items to be included; an initial draft was developed and named the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics (SSPedi) Tool.

Conclusions

This study identified the lack of an appropriate symptom screening tool for use by pediatric cancer patients. A preliminary version of SSPedi was developed. Subsequent work will ensure that it is understandable by children and evaluate its psychometric properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baggott C, Dodd M, Kennedy C, Marina N, Matthay KK, Cooper BA, Miaskowski C (2010) Changes in children’s reports of symptom occurrence and severity during a course of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 27:307–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baggott C, Dodd M, Kennedy C, Marina N, Miaskowski C (2009) Multiple symptoms in pediatric oncology patients: a systematic review. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 26:325–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carelle N, Piotto E, Bellanger A, Germanaud J, Thuillier A, Khayat D (2002) Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 95:155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coates A, Abraham S, Kaye SB, Sowerbutts T, Frewin C, Fox RM, Tattersall MH (1983) On the receiving end—patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19:203–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Collins JJ, Byrnes ME, Dunkel IJ, Lapin J, Nadel T, Thaler HT, Polyak T, Rapkin B, Portenoy RK (2000) The measurement of symptoms in children with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 19:363–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Collins JJ et al (2002) The measurement of symptoms in young children with cancer: the validation of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale in children aged 7–12. J Pain Symptom Manage 23:10–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Boer-Dennert M et al (1997) Patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy: the influence of 5HT3 antagonists. Br J Cancer 76:1055–1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Haes JCJM et al (1996) The Rotterdam symptom checklist: a manual. Northern Centre for Healthcare Research (NCH). University of Groningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dupuis LL, Milne-Wren C, Cassidy M, Barrera M, Portwine C, Johnston DL, Silva MP, Sibbald C, Leaker M, Routh S, Sung L (2010) Symptom assessment in children receiving cancer therapy: the parents’ perspective. Support Care Cancer 18:281–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dupuis LL, Tomlinson D, Ethier MC, Hesser T, Sung L (2012) A systematic review of symptom assessment scales in children with cancer. BMC cancer 12:430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH (1984) Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 74:979–983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gibson F, Aldiss S, Taylor RM, Maguire R, McCann L, Sage M, Kearney N (2010) Utilization of the Medical Research Council evaluation framework in the development of technology for symptom management: the ASyMS-YG. Study Cancer Nurs 33:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffin AM, Butow PN, Coates AS, Childs AM, Ellis PM, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH (1996) On the receiving end. V: Patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy in 1993. Ann Oncol 7:189–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hall RS (1983) The Nominal Group Technique for planning and problem solving. J Biocommun 10:24–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hinds PS, Schum L, Srivastava DK (2002) Is clinical relevance sometimes lost in summative scores? West J Nurs Res 24:345–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Irwin DE, Varni JW, Yeatts K, DeWalt DA (2009) Cognitive interviewing methodology in the development of a pediatric item bank: a patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lynn MR (1986) Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 35:382–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McCorkle R, Young K (1978) Development of a symptom distress scale. Cancer Nurs 1:373–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller E, Jacob E, Hockenberry MJ (2011) Nausea, pain, fatigue, and multiple symptoms in hospitalized children with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 38:E382–E393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA, Kawashima T, Hudson MM, Meadows AT, Friedman DL, Marina N, Hobbie W, Kadan-Lottick NS, Schwartz CL, Leisenring W, Robison LL (2006) Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med 355:1572–1582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Palermo TM, Valenzuela D, Stork PP (2004) A randomized trial of electronic versus paper pain diaries in children: impact on compliance, accuracy, and acceptability. Pain 107:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Parahoo K (2006) Nursing research: principles. Process and Issues, Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. Poder U, Ljungman G, von Essen L (2010) Parents’ perceptions of their children’s cancer-related symptoms during treatment: a prospective, longitudinal study. J Pain Symptom Manage 40:661–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Polit DF, Tatano Beck C (2005) Essentials of nursing research: methods, appraisal and utilization. Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sitaresmi MN, Mostert S, Purwanto I, Gundy CM, Sutaryo, Veerman AJ (2009) Chemotherapy-related side effects in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Indonesia: parental perceptions. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 26:198–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Taddio A, Katz J (2005) The effects of early pain experience in neonates on pain responses in infancy and childhood. Paediatr Drugs 7:245–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tomlinson D, Gibson F, Treister N, Baggott C, Judd P, Hendershot E, Maloney AM, Doyle J, Feldman B, Sung L (2009) Designing an oral mucositis assessment instrument for use in children: generating items using a nominal group technique. Support Care Cancer 17:555–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tomlinson D, Gibson F, Treister N, Hendershot E, Maloney A, Judd P, Doyle J, Baggott C, Feldman B, Sung L (2008) Challenges of mucositis assessment in children: expert opinion. Eur J Oncol Nurs 12:469–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS (2001) PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care 39:800–812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Woodgate RL (2008) Feeling states: a new approach to understanding how children and adolescents with cancer experience symptoms. Cancer Nurs 31:229–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an Operating Grant from the Paediatric Oncology Group of Ontario (POGO). LS is supported by a New Investigator award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lillian Sung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomlinson, D., Dupuis, L.L., Gibson, P. et al. Initial development of the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi). Support Care Cancer 22, 71–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1945-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1945-x

Keywords

Navigation