Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Professional relationships in palliative care decision making

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Decision making in the context of palliative care is particularly complex given the unpredictable illness trajectories experienced by patients and the number of individuals who may be part of decision-making processes. This study aimed to describe the significant issues that influence the processes of care decision making, from the perspective of patients with advanced illness.

Methods

Patients (14), family members (7) and health professionals (18) were interviewed and field observations (100 h) of decision-making practices were undertaken in two Australian palliative care services. A systematic approach using grounded theory to collect and analyse the data was used to develop a theory of decision making from the patient’s perspective.

Results

The main issue experienced by palliative care patients was identified as a lack of involvement in decision making. One of the significant factors affecting the decision process is the type of relationship with health professionals that patients believe enhances their involvement in decision making. This was determined by the manner and focus of the health professional, their trustworthiness as well as the healthcare culture and environment. This paper provides a greater understanding of the perspective of patients in relation to their involvement in decisions related to palliative care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gawende A (1999) Whose body is it, anyway? The New Yorker, New York, pp 85–91

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor SG, Pickens JM, Geden EA (1989) Interactional styles of nurse practitioners and physicians regarding patient decision making. Nurs Res 38(1):50–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Neill O (1984) Paternalism and partial autonomy. J Med Ethics 10:173–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Scott PA (1999) Autonomy, power, and control in palliative care. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 8:139–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Degner L, Kristjanson L, Bowman D, Sloan J, Carriere K, O’Neil J, Bilodeau B, Watson P, Mueller B (1997) Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 277(18):1485–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Degner L, Sloan J (1992) Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play. J Clin Epidemiol 45(9):941–950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Corbin J, Strauss A (2008) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li S (2004) “Symbiotic niceness”: constructing a therapeutic relationship in psychosocial palliative care. Soc Sci Med 58(12):2571–2583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Street A (1995) Nursing replay: researching nursing culture together. Churchill Livingstone, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aranda S (2001) The tyrannies of palliative care. Int J Palliat Nurs 7(12):572–573

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kraetschmer N, Sharpe N, Urowitz S, Deber RB (2004) How does trust affect patient preference for participation in decision making. Health Expectations 7(4):317–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pearson SD, Raeke LH (2000) Patients’ trust in physicians: many theories, few measures, and little data. J Gen Intern Med 15(7):509–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Davison BJ, Degner LF (1998) Promoting Patient Decision Making in Life-and-Death Situations. Semin Oncol Nurs 14(2):129–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The researchers acknowledge the study participants and the organisations that assisted. Funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) to the first and third authors is also acknowledged. Career funding support to the second author from The Cancer Council of WA is also gratefully acknowledged.

Dr. Justin Oakley, Monash University, is also acknowledged for his assistance in the design and analysis phases of the study.

Ethical Approval: obtained from Edith Cowan University in Perth, Western Australia and the clinical institutions involved in the study.

Contribution: Study design: SFL, LK;

Data collection: SFL;

Data analysis: SFL, LK, AW

Manuscript preparation: SFL, LK, AW.

Conflicts of Interest

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan F. Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S.F., Kristjanson, L.J. & Williams, A.M. Professional relationships in palliative care decision making. Support Care Cancer 17, 445–450 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0516-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0516-z

Keywords

Navigation