Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complementary/alternative medicine for supportive cancer care: development of the evidence-base

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this article is to compare the evidence relating to the effectiveness of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) in palliative cancer care as it existed in 2000 and 2005.

Methods

Our comparison is based on systematic reviews using the same methodology at these two points in time.

Results

The results reveal a buoyant research activity in this sector. Consequently, new evidence for 19 CAM modalities has emerged between 2000 and 2005. For some treatments, the evidence is encouraging but for very few, it is as yet fully convincing.

Conclusion

It follows that further research is warranted, particularly in areas where the data already looks encouraging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tovey PA, Broom AF, Chatwin J, Ahmad S, Hafeez M (2005) Use of traditional, complementary and allopathic medicines in Pakistan by cancer patients. Rural Remote Health 5(4):447

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein MS, Brown ER, Ballard-Barbash R, Morgenstern H, Bastani R, Lee J et al (2005) The use of complementary and alternative medicine among California adults with and without cancer. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2:557–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lis CG, Cambron JA, Grutsch JF, Granick J, Gupta D (2006) Self-reported quality of life in users and nonusers of dietary supplements in cancer. Support Care Cancer 14:193–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Arye E, Bar-Sela G, Frenkel M, Kuten A, Hermoni D (2006) Is a biopsychosocial-spiritual approach relevant to cancer treatment? A study of patients and oncology staff members on issues of complementary medicine and spirituality. Support Care Cancer 14:147–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Molassiotis A, Scott JA, Kearney N, Pud D, Magri M, Selvekerova S et al (2006) Complementary and alternative medicine use in breast cancer patients in Europe. Support Care Cancer 14:260–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowenthal RM (2005) Public illness: how the community recommended complementary and alternative medicine for a prominent politician with cancer. Med J Aust 183:576–579

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Helyer LK, Chin S, Chui BK, Fitzgerald B, Verma S, Rakovitch E et al (2006) The use of complementary and alternative medicines among patients with locally advanced breast cancer—a descriptive study. BMC Cancer 6:39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Trevena J, Reeder A (2005) Perceptions of New Zealand adults about complementary and alternative therapies for cancer treatment. N Z Med J 118:U1787

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baum M, Cassileth BR, Daniel R, Ernst E, Filshie J, Nagel GA et al (2006) The role of complementary and alternative medicine in the management of early breast cancer: recommendations of the European Society of Mastology (EUSOMA). Eur J Cancer 42:1711–1714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kemper KJ, Gardiner P, Gobble J, Woods C (2006) Expertise about herbs and dietary supplements among diverse health professionals. BMC Complement Altern Med 6:15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Newell S, Sanson-Fisher RW (2000) Australian oncologists’ self-reported knowledge and attitudes about non-traditional therapies used by cancer patients. Med J Aust 172:110–113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ernst E, Pittler MH, Stevinson C, White AR (2001) The desktop guide to complementary and alternative medicine. Mosby, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ernst E, Pittler MH, Wider B, Boddy K (2006) The desktop guide to complementary and alternative medicine, 2nd edn. Mosby/Elsevier, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomised clinical trials: is blinding necessary. Control Clin Trials 17:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wider B, Ernst E (2003) CAM research funding in the UK: surveys of medical charities in 1999 and 2002. Complement Ther Med 11:165–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ernst E, Filshie J, Hardy J (2003) Evidence-based complementary medicine for palliative cancer care: does it make sense? Palliat Med 17:704–707

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ernst E, Pittler MH (1997) Alternative therapy bias. Nature 385:480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, 25 Victoria Park Road, Exeter, EX2 4NT, UK

    E. Ernst, M. H. Pittler, B. Wider & K. Boddy

Authors
  1. E. Ernst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. H. Pittler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Wider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Boddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Ernst.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ernst, E., Pittler, M.H., Wider, B. et al. Complementary/alternative medicine for supportive cancer care: development of the evidence-base. Support Care Cancer 15, 565–568 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0174-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0174-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation