Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utilising handheld computers to monitor and support patients receiving chemotherapy: results of a UK-based feasibility study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals of work

Recent changes in cancer service provision mean that many patients spend a limited time in hospital and therefore experience and must cope with and manage treatment-related side effects at home. Information technology can provide innovative solutions in promoting patient care through information provision, enhancing communication, monitoring treatment-related side effects and promoting self-care.

Patients and methods

The aim of this feasibility study was to evaluate the acceptability of using handheld computers as a symptom assessment and management tool for patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. A convenience sample of patients (n=18) and health professionals (n=9) at one Scottish cancer centre was recruited. Patients used the handheld computer to record and send daily symptom reports to the cancer centre and receive instant, tailored symptom management advice during two treatment cycles. Both patients’ and health professionals’ perceptions of the handheld computer system were evaluated at baseline and at the end of the project.

Main results

Patients believed the handheld computer had improved their symptom management and felt comfortable in using it. The health professionals also found the handheld computer to be helpful in assessing and managing patients’ symptoms.

Conclusions

This project suggests that a handheld-computer-based symptom management tool is feasible and acceptable to both patients and health professionals in complementing the care of patients receiving chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Affleck G, Tennen H, Urrows S, Higgins P, Abeles M (1998) Fibromyalgia and women’s pursuit of personal goals: a daily process analysis. Health Psychol 17(1):40–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Affleck G, Apter A, Tennen H, Reisine S, Barrows E, Willard A, Unger J, ZuWallack R (2000) Mood states associated with transitory changes in asthma symptoms and peak expiratory flow. Psychosom Med 62:61–68

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aaron LA, Turner JA, Mancl L, Brister H, Sawchuk CN (2005) Electronic diary assessment of pain related variables: is reactivity a problem? J Pain 6(2):107–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bader S, Braude R (1998) Patient informatics: creating new partnerships in medical decision making. Acad Med 73(4):408–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berry DL, Trigg LJ, Lober WB, Karras BT, Galligan ML, Austin Seymour M, Martin S (2004) Computerised symptom and quality of life assessment for patients with cancer Part I: development and pilot testing. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(5):E75–E83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bielli E, Carminati F, La Carpa S, Line M, Brunelli C, Tamburini M (2004) A wireless health outcomes monitoring system (WHOMS): development and filed testing with cancer patients using mobile phones. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 15(4):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown V, Sitzia J, Richardson A, Hughes J, Hannon H, Oakley C (2001) The development of the Chemotherapy Symptom Assessment Scale (C-SAS): a scale for the routine clinical assessment of the symptom experiences of patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Int J Nurs Stud 38:497–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bryman A (2001) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carlson LE, Speca M, Hagen N, Taenzer P (2001) Computerised quality of life screening in a cancer pain clinic. J Palliat Care 17:46–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Celler B, Lovell N, Basilakis J (2003) Using information technology to improve the management of chronic disease. Med J Aust 179:242–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Craddock R, Adams P, Usui W, Mitchell L (1999) An intervention to increase use and effectiveness of self care measures for breast cancer chemotherapy patients. Cancer Nurs 22(4):312–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Department of Health (2002) Delivering 21st century IT support for the NHS: national strategic programme. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Department of Health (2005a) Supporting people with long term conditions: an NHS and social care model to support local innovation and integration. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Department of Health (2005b) Self care—a real choice: self care support—a practical option. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dodd M (1984) Measuring informational intervention for chemotherapy knowledge and self care behaviour. Res Nurs Health 7:43–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dodd M (1988) Efficacy of proactive information on self care in chemotherapy patients. Patient Educ Couns 11:215–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dodd M, Janson S, Facione N, Faucett J, Froelicher ES, Humphreys J, Lee K, Miaskowski C, Puntillo K, Rankin S, Taylor D (2001) Advancing the science of symptom management. J Adv Nurs 33(5):668–676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eng T, Gustafson D (1999) Wired for health and well being: the emergence of interactive health communication. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fieschi M (2002) Information technology is changing the way society sees healthcare delivery. Int J Med Inform 66:85–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Finkelstein J, Hripcsak G, Cabrera M (1998) Telematic system for monitoring of asthma severity in patients’ homes. Medinfo 9(Pt 1):272–276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fortner B, Okon T, Schwartzberg L, Tauer K, Houts AC (2003) The cancer care monitor: psychometric testing of a computer administered system for symptom screening and quality of life in adult cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 26(6):1077–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Furstenberg CT, Carter JA, Henderson JV, Ahles TA (2002) Formative evaluation of a multimedia programme for patients about the side effects of treatment. Patient Educ Couns 47:57–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gaertner J, Elsner F, Pollman-Dahmen K, Radbruch L, Sabatowski R (2004) Electronic pain diary: a randomised crossover study. J Pain Symptom Manage 28(3):259–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldsmith D, McDermott D, Safran C (2004) Improving cancer related symptom management with collaborative healthware. Medinfo 11(Pt 1):217–221

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Goodman J, Syme A, Eisma R (2003) Older adults use of computers: a survey. In: 17th annual human computer interaction (HCI) conference, Bath, 8–12 September 2003

  26. Gustafson D, Hawkins R, Boberg E, Pingree S, Serlin R, Graziano F, Chan C (1999) Impact of a patient-centred, computer based health information/support system. Am J Prev Med 16(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Green J, Thorogood N (2004) Qualitative methods for health researchers. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hill WG, Weinert C (2004) An evaluation of an online intervention to provide social support and health education. Comput Inform Nurs 22(5):282–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Holmes S, Edburn E (1989) Patients’ and nurses’ perceptions of symptom distress in cancer. J Adv Nurs 14:840–846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Horowitz CR, Rein SB, Leventhal H (2004) A story of maladies, misconceptions and mishaps: effective management of heart failure. Soc Sci Med 58(3):631–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jamison R, Raymond S, Levine J, Slawsby E, Nedeljkovic S, Katz N (2001) Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study. Pain 91:277–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kearney N, Miller M, Sermeus W, Hoy D, Vanhaecht K (2000) Multicentre research and the WISECARE experience. J Adv Nurs 3(4):999–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kohlmeier L, Mendex M, McDuffie J, Miller M (1997) Computer-assisted self-interviewing: a multimedia approach to dietary assessment. Am J Clin Nutr 65(Suppl 1):1275–1281

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kurtz M, Kurtz J, Given CC, Given B (1996) Concordance of cancer patient and caregiver symptom reports. Cancer Pract 4(4):185–190

    Google Scholar 

  35. Le PP, Kohane IS, Weeks JC (1995) Using a pen-based computer to collect health related quality of life and utilities information. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995:839–843

  36. Lobchuk M, Degner L (2002) Symptom experiences: perceptual accuracy between advanced-stage cancer patients and family caregivers in the home care setting. J Clin Oncol 20(16):3495–3507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lobchuk M, Kristjanson L, Degner L, Blood P, Sloan JA (1997) Perceptions of symptom distress in lung cancer patients: 1. Congruence between patients and family caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage 14(3):136–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. McCaughan E, Thompson K (2000) Information needs of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at a day-case unit in Northern Ireland. J Clin Nurs 9:851–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McGee M, Gray P (2005) A handheld chemotherapy symptom management system: results from a preliminary outpatient field trial. J Health Inform 11(4):243–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Miaskowski C, Dodd M, West C, Paul S, Schumacher K, Tripathy P, Koo P (2004) A randomised clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self care intervention to improve cancer pain management. J Clin Oncol 22(9):1713–1720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mooney KH, Beck SL, Friedman RH, Farzanfar R (2002) Telephone linked care for cancer symptom monitoring: a pilot study. Cancer Pract 10(3):147–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mullen KH, Berry DL, Zierler BK (2004) Computerised symptom and quality of life assessment for patients with cancer Part II: acceptability and usability. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(5):E84–E89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Guidance on cancer services. Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London

    Google Scholar 

  44. Neville R, Greene A, McLeod J, Tracy A, Surie J (2002) Letters: mobile phone text messaging can help young people manage asthma. BMJ 325:600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ralston J, Revere D, Robins L, Goldberg H (2004) Patients’ experience with a diabetes support programme based on an interactive electronic medical record: qualitative study. BMJ 328:1159–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ream E, Richardson A (1996) The role of information in patients’ adaptation to chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 5(3):132–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Rhodes VA, Johnson MH, McDaniel RW (1995) Nausea, vomiting and retching: the management of symptom experience. Semin Oncol Nurs 11(4):256–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ropka ME, Guterbock T, Krebs L, Murphy-Ende K, Stetz K, Summers B, Bissonette E, Given B, Mallory G (2000) Year 2000 oncology nursing society research priorities survey. Oncol Nurs Forum 29(3):481–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rosenfalck A, Bendtson I (1993) The DIVA system: a computerised diary used in young, type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab 19:25–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Scottish Executive (2003) Partnership for care. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  51. Scottish Executive Health Department (2005) NHS framework for service change in Scotland. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schwartz J, Stone A (1998) Strategies for analysing ecological momentary assessment data. Health Psychol 17:6–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Stone A, Shiffman S, Schwartz J, Broderick J, Hufford M (2002) Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. BMJ 324:1193–1194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Stoop AP, van’t Riet A, Berg M (2004) Using information technology for patients education: realizing surplus value? Patient Educ Couns 54:187–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Taylor PP (2005) Use of handheld devices in critical care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 17(1):45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tiplady B, Jamieson A, Crompton G (2000) Use of pen-based electronic diaries in an international clinical trial of asthma. Drug Inform J 34(1):129–136

    Google Scholar 

  57. VanDenKerkhof D, Goldstein D, Lane J, Rimmer M, Van Dijk J (2003) Using a personal digital assistant enhances gathering of patient data on an acute pain management service: a pilot study. Can J Anaesth 50(4):368–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Velikova G, Wright E, Smith A, Cull A, Gould A, Forman D, Perren T, Stead M, Brown J, Selby P (1999) Automated collection of quality of life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17(3):998–1007

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Wright EP, Selby PJ, Crawford M, Gillibrand A, Jonston C, Perren TJ, Rush R, Smith A, Velikov G, Watson K, Gould A, Gill A (2003) Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice. J Clin Oncol 21:374–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Beatson Oncology Centre, Glasgow, for supporting this study, and the authors wish to extend their thanks and appreciation to all those patients and health professionals who participated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Kearney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kearney, N., Kidd, L., Miller, M. et al. Utilising handheld computers to monitor and support patients receiving chemotherapy: results of a UK-based feasibility study. Support Care Cancer 14, 742–752 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0002-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0002-9

Keywords

Navigation