Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Systematic review of specialist palliative day-care for adults with cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goal of work

To inform future practice, research and policy in specialist palliative day-care by systematically reviewing the evidence for how the structure and process of this form of care relate to outcomes for adults with cancer.

Patients and methods

Medical, nursing and social science computerized databases were searched up until December 2003 for studies of palliative day-care reporting information on service structure, care processes or outcomes including symptom control, quality of life, social and psychological support, and patient and relative satisfaction with care. Qualitative and quantitative studies were assessed for methodological quality and graded, and the findings synthesized into the review.

Main results

Twelve observational studies were found that showed the difficulties of evaluating a service already operating and of recruiting a vulnerable population of patients as they deteriorated. Most services are nurse-led, but varied in the facilities, staff mix, care models, activities and places they offered. Patients attending seemed a selected group of those already receiving palliative care who were mostly white, aged over 60 years and retired, with needs for emotional and social support and pain control. There were insufficient studies to provide conclusive evidence of improved symptom control or health-related quality of life, but all qualitative studies found patients valued the social support and opportunity to take part in activities that day-care provided.

Conclusions

There is evidence for high satisfaction among patients selected into day-care, but not yet sufficient to judge whether this improves symptom control or health-related quality of life. Further research should explore selection and access into care, the most effective models of care, its cost, and potential benefits for relatives and carers. Comparison with models of care for older adults and those with mental illness would also be informative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Council for Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care Services (2000) Palliative care. Commissioning through partnership. NCHSPCS, London

  2. Hospice Information Service (2003-4) Palliative care facts and figures. http://www.hospiceinformation.co.uk (accessed 14 May 2005)

  3. Clark, D, ten Have HAMJ, Jenssus RJPA (2000) Common threads? Palliative care service developments in seven European countries. Palliat Med 14(6):479–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2003) Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. Guidance on cancer services. Manual: http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/csgsmanual.pdf (accessed 14 May 2005)

  5. Gysels M, Higginson IJ (eds) (2003) Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. Research evidence manual. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London. http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/csgspresearchevidence.pdf (accessed 14 May 2005)

  6. Chalmers I, Altman D (1995) Systematic reviews. BMJ, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hearn J, Feuer D, Higginson I, Sheldon T (1999) Systematic review. Palliat Med 13:75–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (1996) Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness (report 4). CRD, York

  9. Cook AM, Finlay IG, Edwards AG, Hood K, Higginson IJ, Goodwin DM, Normand CE, Douglas HR (2001) Efficiency of searching the grey literature in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage 22(3):797–801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spencer DJ, Daniels LE (1998) Day hospice care: a review of the literature. Palliat Med 12:219–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Higginson IJ, Finlay I, Goodwin DM, Cook AM, Hood K, Edwards AGK, Douglas HR, Normand C (2002) Do hospital-based palliative teams improve care for patients or families at the end of life? J Pain Symptom Manage 23:96–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mays N, Pope C (1995) Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 311:109–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mays N, Pope C (2000) Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 320:50–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilkes E, Crowther AGO, Greaves CWKH (1978) A different kind of day hospital—for patients with preterminal cancer and chronic disease. BMJ 2:1053–1056

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cockburn M, Twine J (1982) A different kind of day unit. Nurs Times 78:1410–1411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma K, Oliver D, Blatchford G, Higginbottom P, Kahn V (1993) Medical care in hospice day care. J Palliat Care 9:42–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Edwards A, Livingston H, Daley A (1997) Does hospice day care need doctors? Palliat Care Today 6:36–37

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson B (1990) Hospice day care. Am J Hosp Care 7(1):28–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kennett CE (2000) Participation in a creative arts project can foster hope in hospice day care. Palliat Med 4:419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Copp G, Richardson A, McDaid P, Marshall-Searson DA (1998) A telephone survey of the provision of palliative day care services. Palliat Med 12:161–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Higginson IJ, Hearn J, Myers K, Naysmith A (2000) Palliative day care: what do services do? Palliat Med 14:277–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Faulkner A, Higginson IJ, Heulwen E, Egerton H, Power M, Sykes N, Wilkes E (1993) Hospice day care: a qualitative study. Help the Hospices and Trent Palliative Care, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  23. Langley-Evans A, Payne S (1997) Light-hearted death talk in a palliative day care context. J Adv Nurs 26:1091–1097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Douglas H-R, Higginson, IJ, Myers K, Normand CE (2000) Assessing structure, process and outcome in palliative day care: a pilot for a multi-centre trial. Health Soc Care Community 8(5):336–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hopkinson JB, Hallet CE (2001) Patients’ perceptions of hospice day care: a phenomenological study. Int J Nurs Stud 38:117–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee L (2000) Inter-professional working in hospice day care and the patients’ experience of the service. Int J Palliat Nurs 8:389–400

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goodwin DM, Higginson IJ, Myers K, Douglas H-R, Normand CE (2002) What is palliative day care? A patient perspective of five UK services. Support Care Cancer 10:556–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goodwin DM, Higginson IJ, Myers K, Douglas H-R, Norman CE (2003) Effectiveness of palliative day care in improving pain, symptom control and quality of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 25(3):202–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Olsen SL (1989) Hospice day care standards development in Michigan. Am J Hosp Care 6(2):35–39

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hopkinson JB (1999) A study of the perceptions of hospice day care patients: my phenomenological methodology. Int J Nurs Stud 36:203–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mor V, Stalker MZ, Gralla R, Scher HI, Cimma C, Park D, Flaherty AM, Kiss M, Nelson P, Liliberte L, et al (1988) Day hospital as an alternative to inpatient care for cancer patients: a random assignment trial. J Clin Epidemiol 41(8):771–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sands DA, Galassi A, Chisholm L, Dimond E, Caubo K, Jenkins J (1993) A cancer day hospital: an alternative approach to caring for patients in clinical trials. Oncol Nurs Forum 20(5):787–793

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cheesman S, Christian R, Cresswell J (2001) Exploring the value of shiatsu in palliative care day services. Int J Palliat Nurs 7(5):234–239

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Byass R (1999) Auditing complementary therapies in palliative care: the experience of day-care massage service at Mount Edgcumbe Hospice. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery 5(5):51–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hirose H, Ittetu T, Aoki Y (1997) Aiming at establishment of “palliative day care”—attempt at providing an outpatient salon for cancer patients in the Department of Radiology. Radiat Med 15(5):353–359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Noble S, Hargreaves P (2002) Hospice day care. Eur J Palliat Care 9(4):153–155

    Google Scholar 

  37. Seely S (1990) Why hospice care? Am J Hosp Care 7(1):16–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco TL (eds) (1993) Through the patient’s eyes. Understanding and promoting patient-centred care. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  39. Forster A, Young J, Langhorne P, for the Day Hospital Group (2004) Medical day hospital care for the elderly versus alternative forms of care (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 1. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bentley J, Meyer J, Kefetz K (2001) Assessing the outcomes of day hospital care for older people: a review of the literature. Qual Ageing 2(4):33–41

    Google Scholar 

  41. Marshall M, Crowther R, Almarez-Serrano A, Creed F, Sledge W, Kluiter H, Roberts C, Hill E, Wiersma D (2004) Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 1. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  42. Marshall M, Crowther R, Almarez-Serrano AM, Tyrer P (2004) Day hospital versus outpatient care for psychiatric disorders (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 1. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  43. Catty J, Burns T, Comas A (2004) Day centres for severe mental illness (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 1. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  44. Davies E, Philpot M (2004) God’s waiting room: how do older people with affective disorder view day hospital care? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 19(6):592–593

    Google Scholar 

  45. Davies E, Higginson IJ (eds) (2004) Palliative care. The solid facts. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

  46. Davies E, Higginson IJ (eds) (2004) Better palliative care for older people. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Danielle Goodwin for earlier work identifying search terms and some of the papers for this review. The initial review was funded by a commissioned project from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE), UK, in 2003. It was updated while Elizabeth Davies held a Harkness Fellowship in Health Policy from the Commonwealth Fund, New York, at the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School. The Commonwealth Fund is a New York City-based private independent foundation. The conclusions presented here are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the directors, officers or staff of either NICE or the Commonwealth Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Davies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, E., Higginson, I.J. Systematic review of specialist palliative day-care for adults with cancer. Support Care Cancer 13, 607–627 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0739-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0739-6

Keywords

Navigation