Table 4

Characteristics of patients with breast cancer reporting their care experience with cancer clinical nurse specialists (CNS)

Type of experienceCNS nameContacting CNSSpeaking to CNSUnderstanding CNS
Level of care experienceNot given*
(n=2721)
Excellent
(n=27 740) (72.1%)
Non-excellent
(n=10 736) (28.9%)
Excellent
(n=37 056) (90.6%)
Non-excellent
(n=3852) (9.4%)
Excellent
(n=34 898) (91.4%)
Non-excellent
(n=3303) (8.6%)
Variablen%n%n%N%N%n%n%
Age group
 <4547017.3350612.6189417.6496013.468017.7478613.764019.4
 45–59118943.710 57438.1476144.314 49439.1177446.113 97840.1139742.3
 60–7481229.810 68738.5336931.413 85737.4115530.012 85736.8100030.3
 75–992509.2297310.77126.6374510.12436.332779.42668.1
χ2 and p valueχ2=515.5; p<0.001χ2=257.8; p<0.001χ2=166.4; p<0.001
Ethnicity
 White226883.423 24483.8877481.730 91083.4316282.129 15983.6261779.2
 Non-white1626.012194.47076.617644.82606.716224.63119.4
 Unknown29110.7327711.8125511.7438211.843011.2411711.837511.4
χ2 and p valueχ2=84.4; p<0.001χ2=37.2; p<0.001χ2=147.7; p<0.001
Area
 East Midlands44616.423748.69328.732598.83739.730028.63239.8
 East of England2368.7332112.0123911.5441211.943911.4415411.939311.9
 London31211.5284110.2160715.0402510.964516.7383911.053716.3
 North East712.618606.74284.022446.11554.021296.11324.0
 North West1816.7328411.8111910.4419811.341710.8397411.433410.1
 South East50418.5420215.1186917.4587615.960715.8545915.652916.0
 South West39814.6338712.2122911.4453512.242211.0430012.334010.3
 West Midlands42915.8329711.9112610.5434711.73839.9407211.735310.7
 Yorkshire & Humber1445.3317411.4118711.1416011.241110.7396911.436211.0
χ2 and p valueχ2=751.5; p<0.001χ2=568.8; p<0.001χ2=550.4; p<0.001
IMD
 1—affluent69225.4632922.8253623.6848922.990323.4810623.267920.6
 262022.8667324.1256523.9895824.289723.3847424.375022.7
 357921.3594821.4238822.2803321.779720.7757721.766020.0
 450418.5495217.9184617.2653217.669618.1609017.563019.1
 5—deprived32612.0383813.8140113.0504413.655914.5465113.358417.7
χ2 and p valueχ2=24.0; p=0.02χ2=20.8; p=0.008χ2=78.5; p<0.001
Route to diagnosis
 ER672.53231.21181.14391.2401.03931.1421.3
 GP28610.518576.78718.125787.03168.224277.02808.5
 Screening60922.4831730.0293527.311 10230.0105127.310 38929.884625.6
 Two-week referral127746.915 29555.1606156.520 36655.0215355.919 27055.2186756.5
 Elective referral792.95972.22001.97572.0782.07252.1712.1
 Unknown40314.813514.95515.118144.92145.616944.91976.0
χ2 and p valueχ2=649.2; p<0.001χ2=626.4; p<0.001χ2=637.3; p<0.001
Stage
 I56020.6792328.6266324.810 54928.594024.4982128.177323.4
 II79129.1901232.5339431.611 87932.1119531.011 35532.597829.6
 III2378.725039.010259.533539.03238.431429.034310.4
 IV1706.27792.83183.010422.81403.69312.71394.2
 Unknown96335.4752327.1333631.110 23327.6125432.6964927.6107032.4
χ2 and p valueχ2=281.8; p<0.001χ2=260.8; p<0.001χ2=290.4; p<0.001
  • All χ2 tested for differences between three groups (excellent, non-excellent and not having CNS) across all variables in the table.

  • *Patients who were not given a CNS name were asked to not report their experience with the other three CNS questions (contacting CNS, speaking to CNS and understanding CNS).

  • ER, emergency room; GP, general practitioner; IMD, Indices of Multiple Deprivation.