Table 1

Have interoperability issues been addressed?

Health authority sector		Frequency	%	Valid %	Cumulative %
North of England	No electronic palliative care coordination system (EPaCCS)	19	29	29	29
	SystmOne based	4	6	6	35
	SystmOne based, but incomplete	7	11	10	45
	Medical Interoperability Gateway (MIG)+local integration software	2	3	3	48
	MIG	14	21	21	69
	Issues on going	2	3	3	72
	Graphnet‎/Blackpear/local integration software	8	12	13	85
	EMIS web based	9	13	13	98
	Summary care record (SCR) based	1	2	2	100
	Total	66	100	100
Midlands and East of England	No EPaCCS	34	56	56	56
	SystmOne based	7	11	11	67
	SystmOne based, but incomplete	6	10	10	77
	MIG	5	8	8	85
	Graphnet‎/Blackpear‎/local integration software	6	10	10	95
	SCR based	2	3	3	98
	Adastra based	1	2	2	100
	Total	61	100	100
London	No EPaCCS	5	16	16	16
	Coordinate my care (CMC)	27	84	84	100
	Total	32	100	100
South of England	No EPaCCS	19	38	38	38
	MIG+local integration software	1	2	2	40
	Issues on going	6	12	12	52
	Graphnet‎/Blackpear/local integration software	4	8	8	60
	SCR based	10	20	20	80
	Adastra based	10	20	20	100
	Total	50	100	100