Article Text
Abstract
Background Introducing home-based telerehabilitation (TR) approaches helps clinical experts to choose appropriate and effective interventions and researchers identify knowledge gaps to design clinical trial studies and systematic reviews.
Purpose This study aimed to review the knowledge of home-based TR in multiple sclerosis.
Method This scoping review study was conducted based on Arksey and O'Malley’s five-step approach. The Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Sciences, Scopus and ProQuest databases were searched in 2017–2024 to find full-text English-language articles.
Findings In 25 studies reviewed, various and extensive home-based interventions have been used in physical and cognitive aspects.
Conclusion Home-based rehabilitation is applicable, useful, safe and affordable, maintains the continuity of the rehabilitation process and increases patients’ adherence to the rehabilitation programme. However, there are challenges such as patients’ lack of familiarity with technology and limitations of outcome measurement tools that should be addressed in future studies.
- Home Care Services
- Nursing Home care
- Rehabilitation
- Home Care
Data availability statement
Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data are available on reasonable request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data are available on reasonable request.
Footnotes
Contributors Planning: SS. Conduct, reporting, conception and design: SS and MM. Acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data etc: SS, MM, LR-V and SM. MM is the guarantor. The guarantor accepts full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish: MM
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.