Article Text
Abstract
Objectives Interventions for patients with death rattle remain under consideration, and their families strongly acknowledge the need for improved care. However, few reports exist concerning specific and comprehensive nursing practices for them. This study aimed to clarify nursing practices for patients with death rattle and their families in hospital wards and examine each practice’s importance.
Methods We used a modified Delphi method with expert nurses with extensive experience in end-of-life care. Participants were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling. First, we developed a list of nursing practices through a literature review and individual interviews. Second, we conducted the Delphi survey. Two rounds of judging were performed. Items were rated on a 9-point Likert scale (1=not important at all to 9=very important). An item was considered ‘important’ if at least 80% of the participants rated it ≥7.
Results The list comprised 40 items across 8 domains: assessment of death rattle and the distress felt by the patients, oral care, repositioning, adjustment of parenteral hydration, suctioning, administration of alleviating medications, communication with and assessment of family members who witness death rattle, and nurse’s attitude towards death rattle and the relevant interventions. Of the 46 recruited experts, 42 participated in both rounds. Participants regarded 37 of the 40 items as important.
Conclusions This study specifically and comprehensively identified nursing practices for patients with death rattle and their families using a modified Delphi method to support clinical nursing practice and improve the quality of care.
- Palliative Care
- Terminal care
- Symptoms and symptom management
- Respiratory conditions
- End of life care
Data availability statement
Data are available upon request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data are available upon request.
Footnotes
Contributors SO: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing–original draft, visualisation, project administration. AK: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis, writing–review and editing, visualisation, supervision. KA: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis, writing–review and editing, visualisation, supervision. MT: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis, writing–review and editing, visualisation, supervision. SO is the guarantor.
Funding This work was supported by the SASAKAWA Health Foundation, Japan (grant no. 2022A-008) and JST SPRING, Japan (grant no. JPMJSP2120).
Disclaimer The funders had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and decision to submit the article for publication.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.