Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Advance care planning in multiple system atrophy
  1. Katie Flanagan1,
  2. Anette Schrag2,
  3. Céline El Baou3 and
  4. Joshua Stott3
  1. 1Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK
  3. 3Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Joshua Stott, Department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; j.stott{at}ucl.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Background

There is growing evidence that advance care planning (ACP) can improve end-of-life care in parkinsonian disorders such as multiple system atrophy (MSA), an incurable atypical parkinsonian disorder characterised by a complex and progressive symptomology.1 ACP offers patients the opportunity to record their values and preferences for future medical care. ACP comprises the stages of thinking about values and wishes; having discussions with family, friends and healthcare professionals (HCPs); and completing formal ACP documentation.2 ACP is associated with positive outcomes such as improved quality of care.3

One barrier to increasing the uptake of ACP is the paucity of research on the proportion of patients who engage with ACP and the factors associated with its uptake.4 To address these research gaps, this study used data from the largest survey completed by patients with MSA in the UK to: (1) identify what proportion of people with MSA engage in the different stages of ACP; and (2) identify a range of factors identified in the literature and recorded in the MSA survey to test whether they are associated with the three stages of ACP.

Method

This was a correlational secondary data analysis using data from the 2019 MSA Needs Survey (N=284). Participants provided informed consent, undertaken in line …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors KF: Design, analysis, interpretation, drafting and revision. CEB: Analysis and revisions. AS: Design, interpretation and revisions. JS: Design, interpretation and revisions.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.