Article Text
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate participant-reported atypical dysphagia symptoms and their association with oxaliplatin treatment.
Methods This observational study recruited 73 adults with solid tumours outside the head, neck or upper gastrointestinal tract. All had dysphagia, were in hospital or hospice and were treated by Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology or Palliative Care. Participants reported their experiences of swallowing difficulties by semistructured interview. Oral Health Assessment Tool was used to ensure swallow difficulties were not due to mucositis. Responses were transcribed and analysed by content analysis. Atypical difficulties were examined for association with oxaliplatin treatment by Fischer’s Exact.
Results Oxaliplatin treatment was associated with three unusual dysphagia symptoms: problems with cold or hot bolus (p=0.01), pins and needles (p=0.001) and throat spasm (p=0.035). Carbonation was problematic for one participant. Chemotherapy commencement coincided with swallow problem onset for 67%. Dysphagia symptoms were unrelated to mucositis (p=0.165).
Conclusions Swallowing difficulties in oxaliplatin-treated patients are atypical and attributable to chemotherapy commencement. Previous research suggests that dysphagia is triggered by cold exposure, but hot and carbonated boluses also caused problems here. Dysphagia symptoms and triggers should be studied more fully to help patients safely enjoy their meals and prevent food avoidance, which could exacerbate malnutrition.
- Dysphagia
- Cancer
- Drug administration
- Supportive care
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @ckennyirl
Contributors CK, JR and DW designed the study. CK conducted data collection, analysis and wrote the manuscript. All authors were involved in reviewing and approving the final manuscript draft.
Funding The corresponding author was funded by Atlantic Philanthropies to complete a doctoral dissertation. This research formed part of that doctoral dissertation.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.