Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Cancer-related fatigue—pharmacological interventions: systematic review and network meta-analysis
  1. Ronald Chow1,2,
  2. Eduardo Bruera3,
  3. Michael Sanatani2,
  4. Leonard Chiu4,
  5. Elizabeth Prsic1,
  6. Gabriel Boldt2 and
  7. Michael Lock2
  1. 1Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
  2. 2London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
  4. 4Columbia Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Ronald Chow, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; ronald.chow{at}


Introduction Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a very common symptom in patients with cancer, and one of the five areas of highest priority in cancer research. There is currently no consensus on pharmacologic interventions for treating CRF. The aim of this systematic review is to provide more clarity on which pharmacologic interventions may be most promising, for future clinical trials. The network meta-analysis provides the ability to compare multiple agents when no direct head-to-head trials of all agents have been performed.

Methods Medline (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up until 5 March 2021. Studies were included if they reported on a pharmacologic intervention for CRF. Standardised mean differences and corresponding 95% CIs were computed using a random-effects maximum-likelihood model.

Results This review reports on 18 studies and 2604 patients, the most comprehensive review of pharmacologic interventions for CRF at the time of this publication. Methylphenidate, modafinil and paroxetine were superior to placebo. Methylphenidate and modafinil were equivalent to one another. Paroxetine was superior to modafinil.

Conclusion Paroxetine should be further studied in future trials. As well, more safety data are needed on pharmacologic interventions.

  • fatigue
  • pharmacology

Data availability statement

No data are available. Systematic review; data are available in published papers or via contact with authors.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

No data are available. Systematic review; data are available in published papers or via contact with authors.

View Full Text


  • Twitter @ElizabethPrsic

  • Contributors All authors contributed significantly.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.