Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Factors associated with unscheduled care use by cancer decedents: a systematic review with narrative synthesis
  1. Sarah E.E. Mills1,
  2. Louise J. Geneen2,
  3. Deans Buchanan3,
  4. Bruce Guthrie4 and
  5. Blair H. Smith1
  1. 1Division of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
  2. 2Systematic Review Initiative, NHS Blood and Transplant, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
  3. 3Palliative Medicine & Supportive Care, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
  4. 4College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sarah E.E. Mills, University of Dundee College of Medicine Dentistry and Nursing, Dundee DD2 4BF, UK; s.e.e.mills{at}


Background People who die from cancer (cancer decedents) may experience unpleasant and distressing symptoms which cause them to present to unscheduled care. Unscheduled care is unplanned care delivered by general practitioner out-of-hours and emergency departments. Use of unscheduled care can disrupt treatment plans, leading to a disjointed patient care and suboptimal outcomes.

Objectives This systematic review aimed to identify factors associated with unscheduled care use by cancer decedents.

Method Systematic review with narrative synthesis of seven electronic databases (PubMed; Medline; Embase; Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; Web of Science; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) from inception until 01 January 2020. All observational and experimental studies were included, irrespective of their research design.

Results The search yielded 238 publications included at full-text, of which 47 were included in the final review and synthesis. Unscheduled care use by cancer decedents was influenced by multiple factors, synthesised into themes: demography, clinical and patient, temporal, prescribing and systems. Cancer decedents who were older, men, had comorbidities, or lung cancer, were most likely to use unscheduled care. Unscheduled care presentations were commonly due to pain, breathlessness and gastrointestinal symptoms. Low continuity of care, and oncology-led care were associated with greater unscheduled care use. Access to palliative care, having an up-to-date palliative care plan, and carer education were associated with less unscheduled care use.

Conclusion The review identifies multiple factors associated with unscheduled care use by cancer decedents. Understanding these factors can inform future practice and policy developments, in order to appropriately target future interventions, optimise service delivery and improve the patient journey.

PROSPERO registration number CRD42016047231.

  • cancer
  • end of life care
  • quality of life
  • terminal care

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.


  • Twitter @DrSarahMills

  • Contributors All authors are aware of and agree to the submission and that have all contributed this manuscript sufficiently to be named as authors. All persons or bodies with an interest in this manuscript are aware of its submission and agree to it.

  • Funding SEEM was funded by a Clinical Academic Fellowship through the Chief Scientist Office (reference number: CAF_17_06) and the Claire Wand Fund.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval Ethical review was not required for this literature review.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.