Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Clinical research in cancer palliative care: a metaresearch analysis
  1. Marie Vinches1,2,
  2. Anouk Neven3,
  3. Laurène Fenwarth1,
  4. Mitsumi Terada4,
  5. Giovanna Rossi1,
  6. Sarah Kelly5,6,
  7. Julien Peron7,
  8. Muriel Thomaso8,
  9. Mogens Grønvold9 and
  10. Teresa De Rojas1
  1. 1Medical Department, EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
  2. 2Medical Oncology Department, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
  3. 3Statistics Department, EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
  4. 4International Trials Management Section, Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Japan
  5. 5Fellowship Program, SIOP Europe, Brussels, Belgium
  6. 6Data Management Department, EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
  7. 7Medical Oncology Department, Cancer Institute of the “Hospices Civils” of Lyon, Lyon, France
  8. 8Supportive Care Department, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
  9. 9Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Dr Marie Vinches, EORTC, Brussels 1200, Belgium; vinchesmarie{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objective This metaresearch of the clinicaltrials.gov database aims to evaluate how clinical research on palliative care is conducted within the setting of advanced cancer.

Methods Clinicaltrials.gov was searched to identify registered studies recruiting patients with cancer, and investigating issues relevant to palliative care. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C15-PAL (Quality of Life in palliative cancer care patients) questionnaire was taken into account to define the research domains of interest. Studies investigating cancer-directed therapy, management of cancer treatment-related adverse events and diagnostic tests were excluded. Publication status was crosschecked using PubMed.

Results Of 3950 identified studies, 514 were included. The most frequent reason for exclusion was cancer-directed therapy (2491). In 2007–2012, 161 studies were registered versus 245 in 2013–2018. Included studies were interventional (84%) or observational (16%). Most studies were monocentric (60%), sponsored by academia (79%), and conducted in North America (57%) or Europe (25%). Seventy-nine per cent of studies evaluated a heterogeneous population (>1 tumour type). Interventional studies most frequently investigated systemic drugs (34%), behavioural interventions (29%) and procedures for pain (24%). Pain, quality of life and physical function were the most frequently studied research domains (188, 95 and 52 studies, respectively). The most applied primary outcome measures were efficacy/symptom control (61%), quality of life (14%) and feasibility (12%). Only 16% of the closed studies had published results in PubMed.

Conclusions Our study describes the heterogeneous landscape of studies conducted to address the issues of patients with advanced cancer in palliative care. Albeit the observed increase in the number of studies over the last decade, the generalisation of the results brought by the existing trials is limited due to methodological issues and lack of reporting. A greater effort is needed to improve clinical research that supports evidence-based palliative cancer care.

  • cancer
  • supportive care
  • symptoms and symptom management
  • quality of life
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Twitter @VinchesMarie, @1Sarah_M_Kelly

  • Contributors All authors have taken part in the planning and reporting of the work described in the article. TDR, LF, MT, SK, GR and MV conducted the data extraction. MV and AN conducted the data review and validation. All authors contributed to the manuscript, have reviewed and agreed upon the manuscript content. MV is responsible for the overall content as guarantor.

  • Funding Marie Vinches, Laurene Fenwarth and Julien Peron's work as Fellows was supported by a grant from Fonds Cancer (FOCA), Teresa de Rojas, Mitsumi Terada and Giovanna Rossi's by a grant from the EORTC Cancer Research Fund (ECRF) and Sarah Kelly's by a grant from the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available in a public, open access repository. https://clinicaltrials.gov/; ClinicalTrials.gov data are available to all requesters, both within and outside the United States, at no charge.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.