Article Text

Download PDFPDF

OP84 The challenge of finding the ‘right’ outcome to measure the effects of ACP – Part II
  1. R Sudore1,
  2. D Heyland2,
  3. H Lum3,
  4. J Rietjens4,
  5. I Korfage4,
  6. M Howard5 and
  7. J You5
  1. 1University of California, San Fransisco, USA
  2. 2Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
  3. 3Denver, Colorado, USA
  4. 4Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  5. 5McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada


Background Standardized outcomes that define successful advance care planning (ACP) are lacking. The objective of this study was to create an Organizing Framework of ACP outcome constructs and rate the importance of these outcomes.

Methods This study convened a Delphi panel consisting of 52 multidisciplinary, international ACP experts including clinicians, researchers, and policy leaders from four countries. We conducted literature reviews and solicited attendee input from five international ACP conferences to identify initial ACP outcome constructs. In five Delphi rounds, we asked panelists to rate patient-centered outcomes on a seven-point “not-at-all” to “extremely important” scale. We calculated means and analyzed panelists’ input to finalize an Organizing Framework and outcome rankings.

Results Organizing Framework outcome domains included process (e.g., attitudes), actions (e.g., discussions), quality of care (e.g., satisfaction), and health care (e.g., utilization). The top five outcomes included 1) care consistent with goals, mean 6.71 (±SD 0.04); 2) surrogate designation, 6.55 (0.45); 3) surrogate documentation, 6.50 (0.11); 4) discussions with surrogates, 6.40 (0.19); and 5) documents and recorded wishes are accessible when needed 6.27 (0.11). Advance directive documentation was ranked 10th, 6.01 (0.21). Panelists raised caution about whether “care consistent with goals” can be reliably measured.

Conclusion A large, multidisciplinary Delphi panel developed an Organizing Framework and rated the importance of ACP outcome constructs. Top rated outcomes should be used to evaluate the success of ACP initiatives. More research is needed to create reliable and valid measurement tools for the highest rated outcomes, particularly “care consistent with goals”.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.