You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Oral Presentations
OP49 Wellbeing of family carers of people who died of cancer: preliminary results of the action advanced care planning (ACP) trial
Free
  1. I Vandenbogaerde1,
  2. A de Vleminck1,
  3. J Cohen1,
  4. MN Verkissen1,
  5. L Lapeire2,
  6. F Ingravallo3,
  7. S Payne4,
  8. A Wilcock5,
  9. J Seymour6,
  10. MC Kars7,
  11. U Lunder8,
  12. CA Christensen9,
  13. M Grønvold9,
  14. JAC Rietjens10,
  15. A van der Heide10 and
  16. L Deliens1
  1. 1Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
  2. 2Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  3. 3University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  4. 4Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
  5. 5Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
  6. 6University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  7. 7University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
  8. 8University Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia
  9. 9University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  10. 10Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

Background Previous studies showed that family carers (FCs) who engaged in formal ACP had fewer adverse outcomes in wellbeing compared with FCs who did not. The ACTION trial is the first multicentre randomized controlled trial of ACP in six European countries. This study will report on the effect of ACP on the wellbeing of bereaved FCs.

Methods 451 questionnaires were sent to bereaved FCs 3 months after the patient participating in the trial had died; 163 were returned (response rate: 36.1%; N control= 93, N intervention= 70). Wellbeing was measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Impact Event Scale (IES).

Results No significant differences were found in wellbeing of FCs between groups. The mean scores for the HADS show no significant differences between groups for anxiety (mean score control 7,09 vs. mean score intervention 8,29) and depression (mean score control 6,72 vs. mean score intervention 7,17). No significant differences are found between groups in the mean scores for the IES. Intrusion had a mean score of 21,27 for control vs. 21,38 for intervention; Avoidance had a mean score of 10,34 for control vs. 12,72 for intervention.

Conclusion Despite previous evidence about improved outcomes for wellbeing in FCs in ACP programs, our ACP intervention did not show differences between groups. Possibly the non-response or cultural discrepancies between the different countries have a part in this. More research is needed to explain what mechanisms are present.

This study is supported by a grant from the FWO (nr. G034717N).

https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2019-ACPICONGRESSABS.49

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.