Responses

Download PDFPDF

CPR decision-making conversations in the UK: an integrative review
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    DNACPR- a medical decision?

    This was a very interesting article. As a professional with frequent intensive care duties early discussions about patient’s wishes are best. Ideally, these should take place away from the acute setting. This is what we always hope to have for our unconscious patients being admitted to the unit.

    Unfortunately, these discussions are a bonus rather than routine practice even in end stage disease. Perhaps this partly explains the difference in expectation between the medical team and the family. This leads to management disagreements. It is not uncommon to hear a family “wanting everything doing” for their loved ones in a DNACPR conversation.

    In our training we have always been taught that DNACPR is a medical decision. It is good practice nevertheless to communicate any such major management decisions to the family. Nevertheless, there appears to be a move towards completely patient/family centred care. There are multiple occasions a DNACPR is not put in place as the family will not agree, despite a consensus among multiple consultants.

    In this climate, with the family often seen as the representative of the patient without capacity, is a DNACPR decision still a medical decision?

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.