P-79 Distress versus harm; have we implemented changes to dnacpr documentation following the tracey judgment? | BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Article info

Poster Presentations

P-79 Distress versus harm; have we implemented changes to dnacpr documentation following the tracey judgment?

Free

Authors

Stephanie Shayler 1Severn Hospice, Telford, Warwick, UK 2St Marys Hospice, Birmingham, UK PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Mike Macfarlane 1Severn Hospice, Telford, Warwick, UK PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Derek Willis 1Severn Hospice, Telford, Warwick, UK PubMed articles Google scholar articles

Citation

Shayler S, Macfarlane M, Willis D

P-79 Distress versus harm; have we implemented changes to dnacpr documentation following the tracey judgment?

BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 2017;7:A29.

Publication history

First published March 1, 2017.

Online issue publication

March 29, 2017

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© 2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions