Article Text

Download PDFPDF
30 Development of quality indicators for UK palliative day services (QUALPALUK)
  1. Noleen K McCorry1,
  2. Martin Dempster1,
  3. Sean O’Connor2,
  4. Kathy Armour3,
  5. Joanna Coast4,
  6. Michael Donnelly1,
  7. Anne Finucane3,
  8. Joan Fyvie3,
  9. Louise Jones5,
  10. George Kernohan2,
  11. Kathleen Leemans6 and
  12. Paul Perkins7
  1. 1Queen's University Belfast, UK
  2. 2Ulster University, UK
  3. 3Marie Curie, UK
  4. 4University of Bristol, UK
  5. 5University College London, UK
  6. 6Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
  7. 7Sue Ryder, UK


Introduction Quality indicators are explicitly defined and measurable items that evaluate and describe healthcare (Campbell, 2002). They can provide care users, staff, providers, and purchasers with feedback in relation to the quality of care, sometimes against benchmarks or previous quality assessments. In addition, by providing a valid and reliable means of measuring quality of care, quality indicators (although not sufficient by themselves) can act as a starting point for quality improvement. There are currently no quality indicators designed to assess the quality of palliative day services (PDS).

Aim To develop a set of quality indicators to appraise the care provided by PDS in the UK.

Methods The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was utilised. This multi-stage method combines best available evidence alongside expert consensus. The resultant draft set of indicators was tested for feasibility in 5 UK hospices. A parallel strategy of stakeholder engagement was implemented throughout the research lifecycle.

Results The initial list of 185 candidate indicators identified by a systematic review was reduced to a final list of 30 core indicators, which were found to be appropriate and feasible.

Conclusions This quality indicator set is the first to be produced for PDS, and is available for use by services. It represents a valuable, acceptable and feasible means to assess quality of care in PDS, and a means of identifying goals for quality improvement. Successful implementation of quality indicators in routine practice requires attention to a range of key enablers and barriers.


  1. . Campbell, S M. (2002) ‘Research Methods Used In Developing And Applying Quality Indicators In Primary Care’. Quality and Safety in Health Care , 11(4), pp. 358–364

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.