Statistics from Altmetric.com
We read with interest the letter by Chiarulli and Hebert1 presenting a case of premature diagnostic closure in palliative medicine, and agree that more work should be undertaken to understand and minimise the impact of cognitive bias in the delivery of supportive and palliative care. To this we would add two further observations.
As the authors illustrate, the specialty is not devoid of diagnostic challenge and its clinicians cannot, therefore, be ‘immune’ from diagnostic error. Croskerry's comprehensive scoping of the literature on bias and failed heuristics identifies many cognitive dispositions to respond (CDRs) that may lead to diagnostic error and palliative medicine would appear to be as fertile a field as any for some of these CDRs to manifest.2 Chiarulli and Hebert make a strong case around our susceptibility to one …
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.