Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P 079
  1. Erna Haraldsdottir1,
  2. Paul Baughan2 and
  3. Liz Forbat3
  1. 1 Strathcarron Hospice, Stirlingshire, Scotland
  2. 2 Lead GP Cancer and Palliative Care, NHSFV, Scotland
  3. 3 Cancer Care Research Centre, University of Stirling, Scotland


    Background Whilst uptake of the GSF is widespread there is a lack of evidence to demonstrate how it supports GPs and district nurses to deliver palliative care in primary care. This small study provides insight into the use of GSF meetings within 3 GP practices within NHS Forth Valley.

    Aim To identify how GP practices make use of GSF meetings in order to improve palliative care in primary care.

    Methods GP practices that were considered as ‘good examples’, in relation to use of GSF, were invited to take part in the study. 8 GSF meetings were observed and tape recorded. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data, providing order to the data set and allowing for key themes to emerge and be identified.

    Results There is ongoing uncertainty amongst GPs related to the criteria for when/what patients should be on the palliative care register, especially for patients with long term condition other than cancer.

    There was much variation between the GP practices in regards to how many patients they had on the register from 5–54 and this was not in the expected relation to size of practices.

    GSF meetings were constructed through informal dialogue without any use of formal documents for assessment or management plan.

    GSF meetings were used for a brief update on the patient condition and situation, key symptom and how they were coping at home.

    Only one of the three practices used GSF meetings systematically to check if documents related to Advance Care Planning were in place.

    Conclusion It appeared that the main benefits of the uptake GSF was related to increased awareness, for those who attended the meeting, of the patients' current situation, possible supporting better coordination of care. However it is unclear how the information sharing benefitted patients in relation to clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to explore how uptake of the GSF improves clinical outcomes.

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.