Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Editor's choice
  1. Bill Noble
  1. Correspondence to Dr Bill Noble, Academic Unit of Supportive Care, University of Sheffield, Sykes House, Little Common Lane, Sheffield S11 9NE, UK; bill.noble{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

In this issue we print a variety of papers relevant to supportive and palliative care practice. My editor's choice tackles the content of difficult conversations in clinical practice. Ruth Perry and colleagues’ systematic review of how to communicate prognostic information takes its conclusions from 13 studies of conversation and discourse analysis. The paper gives an account of how various approaches to open discussion and frame information appear to be received in clinical practice.

This crop of papers includes the whole spectrum of clinically relevant studies, from translational work on symptom generation and therapeutics to an editorial by Dawson, Baughan and …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.