Objectives Hospices are increasingly involved in medical student teaching, which the patients generally enjoy. No studies have specifically investigated how hospice patients view the prospect of physical examination by students. Previous evidence involves patients who have already seen students, while the views of other patients are unknown. This study aimed to provide an initial understanding of the views of a diverse group of hospice inpatients on the acceptability and perceived importance of students physically examining them.
Methods 42 hospice inpatients completed a short questionnaire focusing on their views of medical students examining them. Patients chose to do this alone or via a short interview. All inpatients at Exeter Hospice were considered eligible, including patients who were asked and those who may not have been asked to see students; all 42 patients completed the study.
Results In accordance with existing evidence, patients generally held positive views about seeing students. However, many patients expressed concerns about being physically examined by students, specifically including that it might be painful, tiring or embarrassing. Most importantly, several patients who did not wish to be examined by medical students said they would feel obliged to accept it, or would find it difficult to decline.
Conclusions Hospice inpatients generally wish to be involved in medical student teaching, but many are concerned about being physically examined, and some feel a sense of obligation to participate. There are implications for hospices that teach students. Further research is necessary to investigate the frequency and severity of these concerns.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interest None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.