Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
Emergency readmission to hospital is inadequate as a measure of care quality and a poor prognostic sign in haematology patients
  1. D Stangoe1 and
  2. A E Milne2
  1. 1Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, UK
  2. 2Department of Haematology, Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr D Stangoe, FY2, Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, UK; doug_stangoe{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Shortly after taking office, the current government stated its intention to regard readmission to hospital within 30 days as indicative of a previous failed discharge and unworthy of payment.1 This position was reiterated by the Health Secretary in the lay media as the ‘perverse situation at the moment where a hospital might discharge patients too soon and when the patient comes back as an emergency, the hospital gets paid again’.2 Using non-elective readmission as a measure of care quality, we conducted a retrospective audit of …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Corrections
    British Medical Journal Publishing Group