Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Introduction
Women are under-represented throughout the medical academic world: There is a significant gender gap in editorial boards and authorships of scientific medical journals, in boards of medical societies, and as speakers and award winners at medical conferences.1–3 Why is this a problem? Not only is it a question of equality and fairness at the workplace, but also relevant for patient care and team performance: Women internists were found to have lower mortality and readmission rates compared with their men colleagues.4 Additionally, gender diversity proved to be an important factor for the development, process and outcomes of scientific teams. Evidence on gender distribution in editorial boards and authorships of academic palliative care journals and in palliative care societies are scarce. In cancer palliative care, gender distribution was found to be more balanced with 50% of women first and 39% last authors.5 However, the number of women physicians was only 14% in first and 8% in last authors indicating more diverse, interprofessional research teams.5 In palliative care, working in interprofessional teams is common. Accordingly, different and more diverse professional groups …
Footnotes
Contributors MH and GL planned the study and conducted the study design. MH, SR and GL were involved in data collection, statistical analysis and performed the manuscript draft (original draft). PW was involved in data collection and statistical analysis. AE was involved in data analyses. All authors critically revised the manuscript draft writing (review and editing).
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.