Article Text

Download PDFPDF

PP05.005 Shared decision-making and advance care planning in patients with aortic stenosis: status quo and integration in a decision aid
  1. Ana Rosca1,
  2. Selina Steiger2,
  3. Robert Bauernschmitt3,
  4. Frank Scherff4,
  5. Isabelle Karzig1,
  6. Jürgen Kasper5 and
  7. Tanja Krones1
  1. 1Triemli Hospital Zurich, Clinical Ethics Unit, Switzerland
  2. 2University Hospital/University of Zurich, Clinical Ethics, Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland
  3. 3Cardiac Surgery University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  4. 4Cardiology Unit, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  5. 5Department of nursing and health promotion Faculty of health sciences OsloMet Metropolitan University Oslo, Oslo, Norway


Background Shared decision making (SDM) and advance care planning (ACP) are two patient-centered concepts that support patients, their relatives and clinicians to engage in a decision-making process in which patient autonomy is better respected. Integrating the two complex interventions into one may support patients with moderate and high treatment complication risks to make well-informed choices. The purpose of this study was a) to determine how the two concepts are currently applied in usual care and b) to build an integrative evidence based decision aid for patients with aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods For evaluating the status quo, a mixed methods approach was applied. We performed direct observations of patient-clinician consultations and analyzed patients electronic records to determine how SDM and ACP is being applied in current decision-making process. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis with focus on ACP and SDM elements. We further developed a decision aid according to the Decision Aid Factory approach.

Results 15 consultations were observed and 22 randomly selected patient records (from 299) were analyzed until saturation of topics occurred. It revealed that clinicians documented single SDM and ACP elements. Yet no integral process of ‘full ACP or SDM procedure’ was observed. The procedure in case of complications was often prescribed by clinicians due to urgency, instead of engaging in an ACP process with the patient. We used the results, supported by input from expert panels and patient representatives to develop a comprehensive decision aid, separated in three parts: overview, detailed information and graphical comparison of three most common treatment options: transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or palliative care.

Conclusions Meaningful integration of SDM and ACP into a decision aid may help patients make better medical choices regarding their immediate and advance care planning.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.