Background Q3 conditions are progressive, metabolic, neurological or chromosomal childhood conditions without a cure. Children with these conditions face an unknown lifespan as well as unstable and uncomfortable symptoms. Clinicians and other healthcare professionals are challenged by a lack of evidence for symptom management for these conditions.
Aims In this scoping review, we systematically identified and mapped the existing literature on symptom management for children with Q3 conditions. We focused on the most common and distressing symptoms, namely alertness, behavioural problems, bowel incontinence, breathing difficulties, constipation, feeding difficulties, sleep disturbance, temperature regulation, tone and motor problems and urinary incontinence. For children with complex health conditions, good symptom management is pertinent to ensure the highest possible quality of life.
Methods Scoping review. Electronic database searches in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL and a comprehensive grey literature search.
Results We included 292 studies in our final synthesis. The most commonly reported conditions in the studies were Rett syndrome (n=69), followed by Cornelia de Lange syndrome (n=25) and tuberous sclerosis (n=16). Tone and motor problems were the most commonly investigated symptom (n=141), followed by behavioural problems (n=82) and sleep disturbance (n=62).
Conclusion The evidence for symptom management in Q3 conditions is concentrated around a few conditions, and these studies may not be applicable to other conditions. The evidence is dispersed in the literature and difficult to access, which further challenges healthcare providers. More research needs to be done in these conditions to provide high-quality evidence for the care of these children.
- symptoms and symptom management
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors CP developed and implemented the search strategy, reviewed abstracts, titles and full articles, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript and revised it for important intellectual content. KW, TD,
M-CG and RS participated in planning the study, reviewed abstracts, titles and full articles, and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. GB implemented the search strategy and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. HLB provided methodological guidance and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. A-MH reviewed abstracts, titles and full articles and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. HS conceptualised the study, participated in planning the study, reviewed abstracts, titles and full articles, contributed to the writing and revised it for important intellectual content.
Funding This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Knowledge Synthesis Grant #328968.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.