<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com">
<title>BMJ Support Palliat Care Last 6 Issues</title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com</link>
<description>BMJ Support Palliat Care RSS feed -- articles published in the last few days</description>
<prism:eIssn>2045-4368</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>BMJ Supportive &#x26; Palliative Care</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>2045-435X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/7-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/7-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/8?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/9?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/12?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/15?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/17?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/24?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/29?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/36?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/43?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/48?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/51?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/57?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/63?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/72?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/75?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/78?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/277?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/278?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/281?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/288?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/290?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/296?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/301?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/306?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/310?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/315?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/322?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/329?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/335?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/339?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/343?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/349?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/352?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/113?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/117?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/118?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/123?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/127?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/129?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/134?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/135?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/140?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/149?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/154?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/162?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/167?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/174?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/184?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/189?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/193?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/198-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/198-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/199-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/199-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/199-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/200-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/200-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/200-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/201-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/201-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/202-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/202-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/202-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/203-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/203-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/203-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/203-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/204-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/204-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/205-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/205-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/205-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/206-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/206-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/206-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/206-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/207-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/207-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/207-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/208-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/208-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/208-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/209-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/209-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/209-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/210-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/210-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/210-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/211-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/211-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/211-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/212-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/212-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/212-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/213-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/213-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/213-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/213-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/214-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/214-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/214-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/215-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/215-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/215-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/215-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/216-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/216-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/216-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/217-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/217-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/217-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/218-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/218-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/218-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/219-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/219-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/219-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/220-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/220-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/220-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/221-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/221-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/221-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/221-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/222-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/222-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/222-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/223-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/223-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/223-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/224-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/224-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/225-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/225-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/225-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/226-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/226-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/226-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/227-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/227-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/227-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/228-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/228-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/228-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/229-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/229-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/229-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/230-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/230-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/230-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/231-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/231-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/231-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/232-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/232-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/232-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/233-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/233-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/233-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/234-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/234-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/234-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/235-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/235-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/235-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/236-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/236-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/236-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/237-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/237-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/237-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/237-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/238-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/238-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/238-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/239-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/239-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/239-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/240-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/240-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/240-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/240-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/241-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/241-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/241-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/242-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/242-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/242-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/243-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/243-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/243-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/244-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/244-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/244-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/245-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/245-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/245-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/246-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/246-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/246-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/247-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/247-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/247-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/248-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/248-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/248-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/249-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/249-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/249-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/249-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/250-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/250-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/250-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/251-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/251-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/251-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/252-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/252-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/252-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/253-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/253-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/253-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/254-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/254-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/254-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/255-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/255-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/255-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/256-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/256-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/256-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/257-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/257-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/257-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/258-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/258-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/258-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/259-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/259-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/259-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/260-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/260-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/260-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/261-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/261-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/261-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/262-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/262-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/262-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/263-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/263-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/263-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/263-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/264-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/264-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/264-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/265-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/265-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/265-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/266-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/266-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/266-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/267-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/267-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/267-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/268-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/268-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/268-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/269-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/269-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/269-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/270-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/270-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/270-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/271-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/271-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/271-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/272-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/272-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/273?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/275?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/12?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/13?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/42?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/49?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/51?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/56?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/65?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/66-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/66-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/66-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/66-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/67-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/67-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/67-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/68-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/68-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/68-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/68-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/69-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/69-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/69-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/70-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/70-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/70-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/71-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/71-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/71-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/71-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/72-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/72-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/72-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/73-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/73-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/73-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/73-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/74-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/74-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/74-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/75-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/75-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/75-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/75-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/76-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/76-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/76-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/77-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/77-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/77-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/78-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/78-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/78-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/79-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/79-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/79-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/79-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/80-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/80-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/81-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/81-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/81-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/81-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/82-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/82-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/82-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/83-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/83-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/83-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/83-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/84-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/84-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/85-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/85-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/85-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-e?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/87-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/87-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/87-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/88-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/88-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/88-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/89-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/89-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/89-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/89-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/90-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/90-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/90-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/91-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/91-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/91-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/91-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/92-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/92-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/92-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/93-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/93-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/93-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/93-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/94-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/94-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/94-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/95-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/95-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/95-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/96-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/96-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/96-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/96-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/97-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/97-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/97-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/97-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/98-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/98-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/98-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/99-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/99-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/99-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/99-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/100-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/100-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/100-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/100-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/101-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/101-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/101-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/101-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/102-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/102-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/102-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/102-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/103-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/103-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/103-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/104-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/104-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/104-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/104-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/105-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/105-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/105-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-e?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/107-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/107-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/107-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/107-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/108-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/108-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/108-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/109-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/109-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A2-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A2-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A2-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A2-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A3-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A3-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A3-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A4-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A4-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A4-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A5-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A5-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A5-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A6-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A6-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A6-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A7-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A7-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A7-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A8-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A8-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A8-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A9-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A9-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A9-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A10-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A10-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A10-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A11-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A11-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A11-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A11-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A12-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A12-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A12-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A13-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A13-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A13-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A14-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A14-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A14-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A15-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A15-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A15-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A16-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A16-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A16-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A16-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A17-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A17-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A17-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A18-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A18-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A18-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A19-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A19-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A19-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A19-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A20-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A20-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A20-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A21-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A21-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A21-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A22-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A22-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A22-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A23-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A23-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A23-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A24-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A24-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A24-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A25?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A27?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.spcare.bmj.com/homepage/spcare_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://hwmaint.spcare.bmj.com/homepage/spcare_95x60.gif">
<title>BMJ Supportive &#x26; Palliative Care</title>
<url>http://hwmaint.spcare.bmj.com/homepage/spcare_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editor's choice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noble, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000197</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000197</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Drugs: cardiovascular system, Spinal cord, Radiotherapy, Hospice, Radiology, Clinical diagnostic tests, Trauma, Injury]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editor's choice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bereavement in childhood: risks, consequences and responses]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aynsley-Green, A., Penny, A., Richardson, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000029</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000029</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Smoking and tobacco, Epidemiologic studies, Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics), Child health, Child and adolescent psychiatry, Mood disorders (including depression), Health education, Health promotion, Smoking]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bereavement in childhood: risks, consequences and responses]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>4</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Subcutaneous furosemide in advanced heart failure: has clinical practice run ahead of the evidence base?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beattie, J. M., Johnson, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000199</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000199</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Editor's choice, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Drugs: cardiovascular system, Heart failure, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Guidelines]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Subcutaneous furosemide in advanced heart failure: has clinical practice run ahead of the evidence base?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>6</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/7-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Increased mortality in parents bereaved in the first year of their child's life': statistical points and possible extensions]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/7-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chu, W. B., Percy, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000183</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000183</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Pregnancy, Reproductive medicine, Hospice, Ethics of abortion, Ethics of reproduction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Increased mortality in parents bereaved in the first year of their child's life': statistical points and possible extensions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>7</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/7-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Authors' response]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/7-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harper, M., O'Connor, R. C., O'Carroll, R. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000184</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000184</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology, Epidemiologic studies, Pregnancy, Competing interests (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Authors' response]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>7</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/8?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Emergency readmission to hospital is inadequate as a measure of care quality and a poor prognostic sign in haematology patients]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/8?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stangoe, D., Milne, A. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000158</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000158</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology, Epidemiologic studies, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Competing interests (ethics), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Emergency readmission to hospital is inadequate as a measure of care quality and a poor prognostic sign in haematology patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>8</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/9?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intention, procedure, outcome and personhood in palliative sedation and euthanasia]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/9?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Palliative sedation at the end of life has become an important last-resort treatment strategy for managing refractory symptoms as well as a topic of controversy within palliative care. Furthermore, palliative sedation is prominent in the public debate about the possible legalisation of voluntary assisted dying (physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia). This article attempts to demonstrate that palliative sedation is fundamentally different from euthanasia when it comes to intention, procedure, outcome and the status of the person. Nonetheless, palliative sedation in its most radical form of terminal deep sedation parallels euthanasia in one respect: both end the experience of suffering. However, only the latter intentionally ends life and also has this as its goal. There is the danger that deep sedation could bring death forward in time due to particular side effects of the treatment. Still that would, if it happens, not be intended, and accordingly is defensible in view of the doctrine of double effect.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Materstvedt, L. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000040</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000040</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Suicide (psychiatry), Assisted dying, End of life decisions (ethics), Suicide (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intention, procedure, outcome and personhood in palliative sedation and euthanasia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Feature</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>11</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/12?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[News and updates from palliativedrugs.com]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/12?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilcock, A., Charlesworth, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000194</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2012-000194</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epilepsy and seizures, Stroke, Breast cancer, Paediatric oncology, Child health, Hospice, Radiology, Biological agents, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Clinical diagnostic tests, Radiology (diagnostics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[News and updates from palliativedrugs.com]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>News</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>14</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/15?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Articles of interest in other scholarly journals]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/15?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boland, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000181</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000181</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Smoking and tobacco, Epidemiologic studies, Drugs: cardiovascular system, Pain (neurology), Stroke, Hospice, Pain (palliative care), Drug misuse (including addiction), Alcohol-related disorders, Drugs misuse (including addiction), Pulmonary embolism, Biological agents, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Health education, Health promotion, Smoking]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Articles of interest in other scholarly journals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short cuts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>16</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/17?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Has there been any progress in improving the quality of hospitalised death? Replication of a US chart audit study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/17?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To describe the experience of dying in a US tertiary academic medical centre and to compare this experience with a historical decedent sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective, observational, chart audit study of adults (N=159) who died in hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Component hospitals of the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital (MHMH), Lebanon, New Hampshire, and the affiliated Veteran's Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), White River Junction, Vermont.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>159 hospitalised adult decedents comprising a random sample of 100 MHMH decedents and a total sample of 59 VAMC decedents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The authors compared end-of-life (EOL) care in decedents who had a palliative care consultation (PCC) with those who did not. An exploratory analysis compared the EOL care between the 2008 decedent sample and an historical decedent sample (N=104).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>63 of 159 inpatients received a PCC. Decedents receiving a PCC were less likely to die in an intensive care unit, had fewer invasive interventions (eg, intubation, assisted ventilation, dialysis, chemotherapy) and were more likely to have advance directives, do-not-resuscitate orders and comfort measures orders than those who did not receive a PCC. Higher rates of emotional and pastoral care were also noted. Compared with the historical sample, 2008 decedents had a higher rate of invasive interventions, but fewer invasive interventions were noted in the 2008 PCC subsample.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Less invasive EOL care was observed in decedents who received a PCC. Ongoing monitoring of EOL care is critically important for hospital quality improvement programmes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parikh, P., Brokaw, F. C., Saggar, S., Graves, L., Balan, S., Li, Z., Tosteson, T. D., Bakitas, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000089</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000089</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Has there been any progress in improving the quality of hospitalised death? Replication of a US chart audit study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>23</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/24?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breaking bad news sensitively: what is important to patients in their last year of life?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/24?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To understand patients' perspectives on how a diagnosis of a life-limiting illness was first communicated to them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design</st>
<p>In-depth qualitative interviews with 50 people ranging in age from 30 to 93 years, diagnosed with cancer (31), heart failure (13), stroke (three) or neurological conditions (three) and thought by the responsible health professional to be in the last year of life. Participants from two areas of Northern England were recruited through specialist nurses or hospital consultants and interviewed in their current place of residence. Transcribed data were analysed using Framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients were most likely to recall the pace and clarity with which bad news was conveyed. A direct approach was most common, without much prior warning for the patients. Direct information was usually received well when the patient knew the health professional and when it had been suggested that the patient should be accompanied to the appointment. Some professionals did work to set the scene for the eventual news, with a gradual build-up of information, and narrowing down of options. This approach was perceived as appropriate and sensitive. People with heart failure had engaged in much less discussion about their condition, and most did not recall a specific conversation with their doctor about their prognosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Bad news is not always broken in a sensitive way, despite considerable efforts to address this issue. Relatively minor changes to practice could improve the patient experience: greater preparation, provision of sufficient time in consultations and cautious disclosure for new patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanratty, B., Lowson, E., Holmes, L., Grande, G., Jacoby, A., Payne, S., Seymour, J., Whitehead, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000084</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000084</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Drugs: cardiovascular system, Stroke]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breaking bad news sensitively: what is important to patients in their last year of life?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>28</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/29?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Attitudes to morphine in chronic heart failure patients]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/29?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Low-dose opioids are used for the palliation of pain, breathlessness and cough in advanced chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. The authors wanted to determine any potential barriers or facilitators to opioid administration in patients with CHF by assessing their knowledge, concerns and attitudes to morphine therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Semistructured interviews were held with a purposive sample of 10 men with symptoms of CHF. Data were analysed using a constant comparative approach until thematic saturation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four key areas emerged: medication use; symptoms; prior morphine experience; and attitudes, concerns and anxieties regarding morphine use. Despite polypharmacy, participants said that morphine would be acceptable if it was monitored by a trusted healthcare professional. Many patients had experienced morphine before, often in life-threatening situations such as myocardial infarction, when it had helped greatly. Opioids were not strongly associated exclusively with death and dying (in contrast to patient reports in the cancer literature).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Although some concerns about morphine were expressed, these did not appear to override a willingness to consider its use if recommended by a trusted clinician. However, some participants perceived that their doctor was concerned about its use, holding it as a last reserve. Morphine appears to be an acceptable breathlessness treatment option to these people with CHF. Prescribers may need education and reassurance if these medicines are to be used to their full potential and views may be different in other communities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oxberry, S. G., Jones, L., Clark, A. L., Johnson, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000074</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000074</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Drugs: cardiovascular system, Pain (neurology), Stroke, Ischaemic heart disease, Hospice, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Attitudes to morphine in chronic heart failure patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>35</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/36?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Which questions of two commonly used multidimensional palliative care patient reported outcome measures are most useful? Results from the European and African PRISMA survey]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/36?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To evaluate the views of clinicians and researchers on their use of outcome measures and which questions are most important in palliative and end-of-life care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Online survey of professionals working in clinical care, clinical audit and research in palliative care across Europe and Africa identified through national and international associations and databases. Questions focused on measures used, reasons and which questions were important in two commonly used multidimensional measures, the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS) and the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall completion rate was 59% (392/663). Three outcome measures were commonly used by over one in four respondents for clinical practice and over one in 10 for research: the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), followed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and the POS. Measures were used twice as often in clinical practice as in research. The main uses were similar: assessing patients' symptoms/needs (88% and 85% of POS and STAS users, respectively), monitoring changes (62%, 58%), evaluating care (61%, 48%) and assessing family needs (59%, 60%). Respondents rated the most important questions as pain, symptoms, emotional and family aspects. There were no differences in the choice of the most important questions between doctors and nurses or between researchers and clinicians.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In palliative care, outcome measures often used in clinical practice are also often used in research. Questions relating to pain, symptoms, emotional needs and family concerns are consistently considered the most useful and important in palliative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Higginson, I. J., Simon, S. T., Benalia, H., Downing, J., Daveson, B. A., Harding, R., Bausewein, C., on behalf of PRISMA]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000061</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000061</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pain (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Which questions of two commonly used multidimensional palliative care patient reported outcome measures are most useful? Results from the European and African PRISMA survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>42</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/43?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Where do patients known to a community palliative care service die?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/43?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The majority of people would prefer to die at home and National Health Service policy aims to support this concept. This service evaluation compared the preferred and actual place of death of patients known to a specialist community palliative care service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>All deaths of patients (n=788) known to the specialist palliative care service from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2010 were examined in a service evaluation to compare the actual place of death with the preferred place of death previously identified by the patient. Triggers for admission were established when patients did not achieve this preference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>69% of patients (n=263) who expressed a preference to die at home and 82% of patients (n=93) who expressed a preference to die as inpatients in the hospice fulfilled these preferences. 71% of patients (n=298) who wanted to die in their current place of residence achieved this preference.</p>
<p>54% of patients (n=121) who declined to express a preference for end-of-life care subsequently died in hospital, reflecting the importance of advance care planning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The perceived lack of social support for patients dying at home is a significant trigger for admission to a hospice. The provision of sitters to support patients dying at home may ensure people achieve their preference. Commissioners consider preferred place of care to be a marker of quality, but clinical events that precipitate admission are often outside the influence of the palliative care team.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Capel, M., Gazi, T., Vout, L., Wilson, N., Finlay, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000097</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000097</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Where do patients known to a community palliative care service die?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>43</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>47</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/48?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The role of specialist palliative care in managing patients with multimorbidity]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/48?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This case report describes a patient with multiple morbidity resulting from complicated type 2 diabetes, psoriatic arthritis and abdominal surgery. It highlights the importance of specialist palliative care services in meeting his complex holistic care needs. We acknowledge the growing number of patients living with multiple morbidity and the challenges this group can present. There is then a debate around when to involve specialist palliative care services in the management of multiple morbidity given that there is often an uncertain disease trajectory.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calam, M. J., Gwynn, A., Perkins, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000102</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000102</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Hospice, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Dermatology, Diabetes, Metabolic disorders]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The role of specialist palliative care in managing patients with multimorbidity]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>48</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>50</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/51?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Radiation therapy in malignant spinal cord compression: what is the current knowledge on fractionation schedules? A systematic literature review]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/51?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) in patients with short life expectancy is most frequently treated with radiotherapy and/or corticosteroids. Hypofractionation has been proven to be efficient in metastatic bone pain, but the level of evidence for hypofractionation in MSCC is limited. Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for all relevant articles. Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. The first RCT compared hypofractionation (8 gray (Gy)<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>2) with a more fractionated regimen. No differences in symptom control, duration of response or survival were detected. The second RCT compared 8 Gy<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>2 with 8 Gy<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>1. No significant differences in symptom control, duration of response or survival were detected. Five prospective non-randomised studies identified no differences in post-treatment motor function. Of 17 identified retrospective studies the largest included 1304 patients, treated with five different regimens ranging from 8 Gy<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>1 to 2 Gy<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>20, and found similar post-treatment ambulatory status. A Cochrane review based on the first published RCT concluded that short courses of radiotherapy appear to be justified in patients with a poor prognosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lohre, E. T., Lund, J.-A., Kaasa, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000154</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000154</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Pain (neurology), Spinal cord, Radiotherapy, Radiology, Clinical diagnostic tests, Trauma, Internet, Injury]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Radiation therapy in malignant spinal cord compression: what is the current knowledge on fractionation schedules? A systematic literature review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>56</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/57?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality for home palliative care: an Italian metropolitan multicentre JCI-certified model]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/57?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Assessing the quality of care and service delivery through the analysis of ad hoc indicators is a relevant process for quality monitoring and improvement with a view to providing patients, the community and administrators alike with appropriate elements of evaluation. This paper describes the key results of a certification process based on the Joint Commission International (JCI) criteria for the home hospitalisation model implemented by the palliative care units of seven Milan hospitals for terminally ill patients with cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In 2006, the interhospital working team implemented a certification project based on the JCI Disease or Condition-Specific Care (DSCS) programme. Thirty standards subdivided into five functional areas with 150 measurable elements were the starting-point for periodic improvement plans within and across participating hospitals. Programme compliance was analysed in terms of annual performance improvement and consistency across the seven PCUs involved in achieving set goals. The JCI standards were applied on 3316 terminally ill patients with cancer treated at home from 2005 to 2009.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>As a result of the work carried out, the JCI survey conducted 3 years after project implementation demonstrated full compliance with the established standards, leading to the JCI certification award (for the first time in this clinical setting internationally).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The work carried out with a view to certification has confirmed the possibility that facilities spread across different hospitals can actually share common processes and standardise the activities for the care of end-of-life patients with cancer at home as if they were one single service provider.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rizzi, F., Pizzuto, M., Lodetti, L., Corli, O., Da Col, D., Damiani, M. E., Mihali, D., Piva, L., Saita, L., Vinci, M., Bonaldi, A., Milan Palliative Care Group Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare.d4920rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare.d4920rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Quality improvement]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality for home palliative care: an Italian metropolitan multicentre JCI-certified model]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Republished research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>62</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/63?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of Prognosis in Palliative care Study (PiPS) predictor models to improve prognostication in advanced cancer: prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/63?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To develop a novel prognostic indicator for use in patients with advanced cancer that is significantly better than clinicians' estimates of survival.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective multicentre observational cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>18 palliative care services in the UK (including hospices, hospital support teams, and community teams).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1018 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer, no longer being treated for cancer, and recently referred to palliative care services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Performance of a composite model to predict whether patients were likely to survive for "days" (0-13 days), "weeks" (14-55 days), or "months+" (&gt;55 days), compared with actual survival and clinicians' predictions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>On multivariate analysis, 11 core variables (pulse rate, general health status, mental test score, performance status, presence of anorexia, presence of any site of metastatic disease, presence of liver metastases, C reactive protein, white blood count, platelet count, and urea) independently predicted both two week and two month survival. Four variables had prognostic significance only for two week survival (dyspnoea, dysphagia, bone metastases, and alanine transaminase), and eight variables had prognostic significance only for two month survival (primary breast cancer, male genital cancer, tiredness, loss of weight, lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, alkaline phosphatase, and albumin). Separate prognostic models were created for patients without (PiPS-A) or with (PiPS-B) blood results. The area under the curve for all models varied between 0.79 and 0.86. Absolute agreement between actual survival and PiPS predictions was 57.3% (after correction for over-optimism). The median survival across the PiPS-A categories was 5, 33, and 92 days and survival across PiPS-B categories was 7, 32, and 100.5 days. All models performed as well as, or better than, clinicians' estimates of survival.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In patients with advanced cancer no longer being treated, a combination of clinical and laboratory variables can reliably predict two week and two month survival.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwilliam, B., Keeley, V., Todd, C., Gittins, M., Roberts, C., Kelly, L., Barclay, S., Stone, P. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare.2012.d4920rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare.2012.d4920rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oesophagus, Epidemiologic studies, Immunology (including allergy), Breast cancer, Hepatic cancer, Urological cancer, Hospice, Eating disorders, Urological surgery, Calcium and bone]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of Prognosis in Palliative care Study (PiPS) predictor models to improve prognostication in advanced cancer: prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Republished research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>63</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>71</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/72?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Public opinion on preferences and priorities for end-of-life care in sub-Saharan Africa: piloting a novel method of street surveying]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/72?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>There is a great need for end-of-life care in Africa due to the high incidence of life-threatening illness. However, little is known about the views of the African public on end-of-life care. Therefore, the authors piloted a street survey in Nairobi (Kenya), where adult pedestrians were randomly interviewed about local preferences and priorities for end-of-life care. Two of 19 people consented but later withdrew, one because of religious beliefs and one because of the sensitive nature of the subject. Interviews took approximately 15 min. Interviewers' field notes revealed no major problems with content, but identified tribal and ethnic origin as a sensitive topic, and stressed the usefulness of the presence of a &lsquo;buddy&rsquo; for the safety of the interviewer. One participant found it upsetting to talk about the topic and did not want to be informed about a terminal illness. The 16 remaining participants said the interview was not distressing and answered all questions. All 17 had experienced the death of a close relative in the last 5 years. Methodological and implementation lessons have been learnt and the results of the pilot suggest street surveying is a feasible and acceptable method to examine public opinion on end-of-life care in Africa, provided people are able to freely decline to respond and safety measures are in place for interviewer. This novel pilot offers a new opportunity for health research in Africa.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Downing, J., Gikaara, N., Gomes, B., Daveson, B. A., Higginson, I. J., Harding, R., on behalf of Project PRISMA]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000112</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000112</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Public opinion on preferences and priorities for end-of-life care in sub-Saharan Africa: piloting a novel method of street surveying]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>74</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/75?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative medicine and smartphones: an opportunity for innovation?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/75?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The use of smartphones and their software applications (apps) provides health professionals with opportunities to integrate technology into clinical practice. Increasing numbers of work-related apps are available to health professionals, especially in certain specialties such as orthopaedics. However, so far the availability of apps specific to palliative medicine is limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To review all smartphone apps targeted at health professionals within palliative medicine and available for the five most popular operating systems (iPhone, Blackberry, Android, Palm and Windows) .</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Each smartphone app store was systematically searched with a combination of the following keywords: palliative, pain, cancer, symptoms, medicine. Identified apps were purchased and tested to determine if their title and/or description was relevant to palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six apps specific to palliative medicine were identified across all five operating systems. These consisted of blog orientated apps (Pallimed and Geripal), an app containing guidelines from eight cancer networks (PalliApp), an educational app (Palliative Care) and opioid dose converter apps (eOpioid and PalliCalc).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There is a lack of palliative medicine specific resources for smartphones and no studies have been published which examine the potential benefits of mobile technology for learning, clinical practice and professional development. This provides an opportunity for further research and development. Academic institutions could work with technological developers to improve access to, and dissemination of, key information for practice. Considered development of mobile technology has the potential to improve patient care, data sharing and education within the palliative medicine specialty.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nwosu, A. C., Mason, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000151</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000151</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Pain (neurology), Hospice, IT]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative medicine and smartphones: an opportunity for innovation?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Education</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>77</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/78?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[For Aneurin Bevan]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/2/1/78?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hope, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000124</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000124</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology, Dentistry and oral medicine, Competing interests (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[For Aneurin Bevan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poem</prism:section>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>78</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>78</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/277?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editor's choice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/277?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noble, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000155</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000155</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pancreas and biliary tract, Clinical trials (epidemiology), Editor's choice, General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pain (neurology), Pancreatic cancer, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Pain (palliative care), Complementary medicine, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editor's choice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>277</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>277</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/278?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medicine and the moral compass]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/278?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[George, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000123</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000123</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology, Hospice, Sexual and gender disorders, Sexual health, Competing interests (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medicine and the moral compass]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>278</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>278</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/279?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Who pays for palliative care: an opportunity to get it right]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/279?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maher, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000128</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000128</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), Paediatric oncology, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Memory disorders (psychiatry), Complementary medicine, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Who pays for palliative care: an opportunity to get it right]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>280</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/281?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Expert conference on cancer pain assessment and classification--the need for international consensus: working proposals on international standards]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/281?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>An increasing number of cancer patients live longer, and palliative care has become an important part of their treatment. Symptoms are often inadequately assessed and managed. A significant challenge in clinical trials is to control for the variability of the samples being studied. To overcome this problem, classification systems have been developed in order to characterise and stratify patients by grouping them according to major common characteristics. The lack of agreed methods for the assessment and classification of cancer pain has been clearly indicated in clinical trials and in clinical practice and may be one possible explanation for the inadequate treatment of cancer pain. This was the background to an international expert meeting arranged in September 2009 in Milan, Italy. The primary aims were to produce recommendations on how to assess and classify cancer pain and to recommend a strategy for the further development, validation and implementation of an international cancer pain classification and assessment system. The recommendations consisted of two basic working proposals, nine specific working proposals and seven recommendations for the further development of a cancer pain classification system. Examples of specific working proposals were to include pain intensity, pain mechanism, breakthrough pain and psychological distress as the core domains in this classification of cancer pain and to measure pain intensity with a 0&ndash;10 numerical rating scale with &lsquo;no pain&rsquo; and &lsquo;pain as bad as you can imagine&rsquo; as anchors. The proposed name for this international standard is Cancer Pain Assessment and Classification System (CPACS).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaasa, S., Apolone, G., Klepstad, P., Loge, J. H., Hjermstad, M. J., Corli, O., Strasser, F., Heiskanen, T., Costantini, M., Zagonel, V., Groenvold, M., Fainsinger, R., Jensen, M. P., Farrar, J. T., McQuay, H., Rothrock, N. E., Cleary, J., Deguines, C., Caraceni, A., European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC) and the European Association for Palliative Care Research Network (EAPCRN)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000078</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000078</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Expert conference on cancer pain assessment and classification--the need for international consensus: working proposals on international standards]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>287</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/288?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[News and updates from palliativedrugs.com]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/288?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilcock, A., Charlesworth, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000144</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000144</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Drugs: cardiovascular system, Pain (neurology), Paediatric oncology, Ischaemic heart disease, Child health, Hospice, Medicines regulation, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Osteoporosis, Sports and exercise medicine, Poisoning, Trauma, Calcium and bone, Occupational and environmental medicine, Injury]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[News and updates from palliativedrugs.com]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>289</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/290?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Articles of interest in other scholarly journals]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/290?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boland, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000146</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000146</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Epidemiologic studies, Long term care, Drugs: cardiovascular system, Pain (neurology), Stroke, Hypertension, Diet, Lung cancer (oncology), Chemotherapy, Ischaemic heart disease, Hospice, Pain (palliative care), Lung cancer (respiratory medicine), Biological agents, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Articles of interest in other scholarly journals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short cuts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>290</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>290</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/291?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patients with pancreatic cancer and relatives talk about preferred place of death and what influenced their preferences: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/291?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore reasons why people with pancreatic cancer, who are reaching the end of their lives, say they wish to die at home or elsewhere, and why preferences may change.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study using semistructured interviews followed by thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Respondents recruited from different parts of the UK during 2009/2010.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>16 people with experience of pancreatic cancer (8 patients and 8 bereaved relatives) who discussed place of death in detail during an in-depth interview (from a total sample of 32 people with pancreatic cancer and eight relatives of others who had died of this disease).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>People's preferences were affected by their perceptions and previous experiences of care available at home, in a hospice or hospital. Preferences were also shaped by fears about possible loss of dignity, or fears of becoming a burden. Some people thought that a home death might leave bad memories for other members of the family. People with pancreatic cancer and their relatives were aware that preferences might change (or had changed) as death approached.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The National Health Service End of Life Care Strategy for England seeks to meet the needs of people who are dying and promotes better support for home deaths. More information is needed about why patients hold different views about place of care and place of death, why patients' preferences change and what importance patients attach to place of death. Health professionals should bear this in mind if the subject is raised during advance care planning.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chapple, A., Evans, J., McPherson, A., Payne, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000091</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000091</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pancreas and biliary tract, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pancreatic cancer, End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patients with pancreatic cancer and relatives talk about preferred place of death and what influenced their preferences: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>295</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/296?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the therapeutic power of narrative at the end of life: a qualitative analysis of narratives emerging in dignity therapy]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/296?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To understand the therapeutic effect of a narrative intervention, specifically dignity therapy, in patients at the end-of-life. To examine the thematic dimensions and shared narrative features of the stories that emerge in dignity therapy and theorise their relationship to the intervention's clinical impact.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Resident physicians, as part of an educational intervention, co-administered the dignity therapy protocol with the principal investigator. Interviews were transcribed, edited, and then, within a week, read back to the patient and provided as a document for the patient to keep. A constant comparative approach was taken to identify narratives and thematic patterns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>12 Patients at the end-of-life were administered dignity interviews by 12 resident physicians, accompanied by the principal investigator.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Palliative care settings in two University of Toronto academic hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three narrative types emerged, each containing several themes. Evaluation narratives create a life lived before illness, with an overarching theme of overcoming adversity. Transition narratives describe a changing health situation and its meanings, including impact on family and on one's world view. Legacy narratives discuss the future without the patient and contain the parables and messages to be left for loved ones.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>While the interview protocol guides patients' responses, the commonality of narrative structures across interviews suggests that patients draw on experiences with two familiar genres: the eulogy and the medical interview, to create a narrative order during the chaos of dying. The dignity interview's resonance with these genres appears to facilitate a powerful, and perhaps unexpected sense of agency.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tait, G. R., Schryer, C., McDougall, A., Lingard, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000051</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000051</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the therapeutic power of narrative at the end of life: a qualitative analysis of narratives emerging in dignity therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>296</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>300</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/301?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Oncology professionals' views on the use of antidepressants in cancer patients: a qualitative interview study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/301?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Emotional distress, including depression, is an important issue for cancer patients and their families. Guidelines recommend the use of antidepressant drugs (ADs) for the management of depression in cancer. This study explores the views of oncology professionals about the inclusion of ADs in treatment plans.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Semi-structured interview study. Data were analysed using framework analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A specialist cancer centre and six district general hospitals across the Yorkshire Cancer Network.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>18 randomly selected professionals from lung, breast, urology and colorectal cancer teams: oncologists (n=8), surgeons (n=3), clinical nurse specialists (n=2) and ward nurses (n=5).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three main themes emerged relating to professionals' attitudes, knowledge and behaviour. Positive attitudes were primarily expressed by nurses. However, negative views were expressed about the potential for over-reliance on ADs, and their use constituting &lsquo;giving in&rsquo;. Doctors reported a lack of confidence in the use of and knowledge about ADs with an associated reluctance to prescribe. The general practitioner (GP) was regarded as the most appropriate professional to prescribe ADs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Cancer professionals highlighted a need for training in the appropriate use of ADs. Further, this research suggests that negative attitudes towards antidepressants may be a factor in their exclusion from treatment plans. The GP is seen to have a key prescribing role for AD therapy; however, it is unclear whether the GPs is asked to do this. This research raises questions about the adequacy of ADs in cancer care and to what extent the GP is able to meet this need.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holch, P., Absolom, K. L., Pini, S., Hill, K. M., Liu, A., Sharpe, M., Richardson, A., Hosker, C., Velikova, G., on behalf of the NCRI COMPASS Supportive and Palliative Care Collaborative]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000076</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000076</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Colon cancer, Mood disorders (including depression), Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Oncology professionals' views on the use of antidepressants in cancer patients: a qualitative interview study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>301</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>305</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/306?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increased mortality in parents bereaved in the first year of their child's life]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/306?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify the relative risk (RR) of mortality in bereaved parents compared with non-bereaved counterparts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective data linkage study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>United Kingdom, 1971&ndash;2006.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A random sample from death registrations (5%) of parents who had a live birth where the infant lived beyond its first year of life (non-bereaved parents) and parents who had experienced a stillbirth or the death of a child in its first year of life (bereaved parents) between 1971 and 2006.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Death or widowhood of the parent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Bereaved parents in Scotland (n=738) were more than twice as likely to die in the first 15 years after their child's death than non-bereaved parents (n=50 132), p&lt;0.005. Bereaved mothers in England and Wales (n=481) were more than four times as likely to die in the first 15 years after their child's birth than non-bereaved parents (n=30 956), p&lt;0.001. The mortality risk for bereaved mothers compared with non-bereaved mothers, followed up for 25 years after death, was 1.5 (bereaved n=745, non-bereaved n=36 434), p&lt;0.005. When followed up for 35 years, the risk of mortality for bereaved mothers (n=1120) was 1.2 times that of non-bereaved mothers (n=36 062), p&lt;0.005.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Bereaved parents who experience stillbirth or infant death have markedly increased mortality compared with non-bereaved parents, up to 25 years (mean) after the death of their child. However, the RR reduces over time.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harper, M., O'Connor, R. C., O'Carroll, R. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000025</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000025</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Editor's choice, Press releases, Pregnancy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increased mortality in parents bereaved in the first year of their child's life]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>306</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>309</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/310?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Opinions of patients with cancer on the relative importance of place of death in the context of a 'good death']]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/310?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The primary objective of the study was to determine the relative importance of place of death to patients with advanced cancer being treated at a cancer centre in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Demographic data were collected from the electronic patient record system, with additional information obtained from the patients themselves. Patients were questioned about a variety of end of life issues, including preferred place of death (PPD), and &lsquo;acceptable&rsquo; places of death. They were also asked to rank the importance of factors previously linked to a &lsquo;good death&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>120 patients participated in the study. 51 (42.5%) patients stated that &lsquo;home&rsquo; was their PPD, while 80 (67%) patients stated that home was an acceptable place of death. Patients from areas with worse deprivation scores were less likely to want to die at home than patients from areas with better deprivation scores (p=0.03). The most important factors associated with a good death were &lsquo;to have my pain/symptoms well controlled&rsquo;, &lsquo;to not be a burden to my family&rsquo; and &lsquo;to have sorted out my personal affairs&rsquo; respectively. Place of death was ranked as the seventh most important factor.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Place of death is undoubtedly an important factor in achieving a good death for some patients and carers. However, for others a home death is either unimportant or to be avoided. The results of this study, and the results of similar studies, suggest that place of death may not be a good marker of the quality of end of life care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Waghorn, M., Young, H., Davies, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000041</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000041</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Opinions of patients with cancer on the relative importance of place of death in the context of a 'good death']]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>310</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>314</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/315?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A novel approach to enhancing hope in patients with advanced cancer: a randomised phase II trial of dignity therapy]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/315?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Main objective</st>
<p>To assess the ability of dignity therapy to reduce distress in advanced cancer patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A phase II open-label trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Two UK National Health Service trusts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>45 adults with advanced cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Dignity therapy: a brief palliative care psychotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Participants were randomly allocated to receive the intervention plus standard care or standard care only (control group). Outcomes were collected at baseline and at 1- and 4-week follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was dignity-related distress (Palliative Dignity Inventory). Secondary outcomes were hope, anxiety and depression, quality of life, palliative-related outcomes, and self-reported study benefits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>45/188 (24%) patients responded. 27/45 (60%) participants remained at 1-week and 20/45 (44%) at 4-week follow-up. Baseline levels of distress were low. Groups did not differ in dignity-related distress at any time. An effect on only one secondary outcome was found: the intervention group reported more hope than the control group at both follow-ups. Effect sizes were medium (partial <sup>2</sup>=0.20 and 0.15) and the difference was statistically significant at 1-week follow-up (difference in adjusted means 2.55; 95% CI &ndash;4.73 to 0.36; p=0.02). The intervention group was more positive than the control group on all the self-reported benefits ratings. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) ranged from 1.34 for feeling that dignity therapy had helped to 0.31 for increasing will to live.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The effects of dignity therapy on people with advanced cancer are encouraging. Further investigation is warranted focusing on distressed patients and those earlier in the palliative care trajectory.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial register number</st>
<p>ISRCTN29868352.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hall, S., Goddard, C., Opio, D., Speck, P. W., Martin, P., Higginson, I. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000054</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000054</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Stroke, Hospice, Psychotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A novel approach to enhancing hope in patients with advanced cancer: a randomised phase II trial of dignity therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>315</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>321</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/322?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary consultation team for cancer pain and palliative care in a large university hospital in the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/322?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Multidisciplinary palliative care teams (PCTs) are increasingly employed for cancer patients. However, relatively few studies have prospectively assessed the clinical effectiveness of inpatient PCTs. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary PCT for hospitalised cancer patients in a large university hospital in the Netherlands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Clinical data and duration of hospitalisation were prospectively collected between January 2007 and December 2008. A group of cancer pain patients from 2006 served as a historical control.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The number of consultations increased from 130 in 2006 to 235 in 2008. The reason for consultation changed from pain in 98% of consultations in 2006 to a diversity of palliative symptoms in 2008. In 2008 a significant decrease in mean pain intensity, including a 70% reduction in severe pain, occurred within 24 h following consultation, although the authors did not demonstrate that the effectiveness of the PCT in 2007 and 2008 surpassed that of routine oncological care including pain control in 2006. Similarly, the median severity for 7 out of 10 items from the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) decreased significantly within 72 h following consultation. The median number of days in hospital for patients for whom the PCT was consulted decreased from 14 days in 2006 to 10 days in 2008.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The authors conclude that a multidisciplinary PCT for clinical cancer patients may have a positive effect on pain, on ESAS symptoms and on duration of hospitalisation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jongen, J. L. M., Overbeck, A., Stronks, D. L., van Zuylen, L., Booms, M., Huygen, F. J., van der Rijt, C. C. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000087</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000087</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary consultation team for cancer pain and palliative care in a large university hospital in the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>322</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>328</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/329?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How is agitation and restlessness managed in the last 24 h of life in patients whose care is supported by the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/329?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Guidance regarding the patient centred management of agitation and restlessness reinforces the importance of considering underlying causes, non-pharmacological approaches to treatment and judicious use of medications titrated to patient need. In contrast, recent reports in the literature suggest that the practice of continuous deep sedation until death is prevalent in the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To use data from the National Care of the Dying Audit - Hospitals (NCDAH) to explore the administration of medication for management of agitation and restlessness in the last 24 h of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Hospitals submitted data from up to 30 consecutive adult patients whose care in the final hours/days of life was supported by the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP). Data on the total dose received in the last 24 h of life PRN and the last dose prescribed for administration via continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) for agitation and restlessness were submitted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>155 hospitals provided data from 3893 patients. Median total doses in the last 24 h for midazolam, haloperidol and levomepromazine, respectively, were: PRN only, 2.5, 1.5 and 6.25 mg; CSCI only, 10, 3 and 6.25 mg; PRN+CSCI, 15, 3 and 12.5 mg.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Only 51% of patients received medication to alleviate agitation and restlessness in the last 24 h of life. Median doses were low in comparison to doses recommended for continuous deep sedation, suggesting that there is no &lsquo;blanket&rsquo; policy for continuous deep sedation at the end of life for patients whose care is supported by the LCP.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gambles, M., McGlinchey, T., Latten, R., Dickman, A., Lowe, D., Ellershaw, J. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000075</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000075</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How is agitation and restlessness managed in the last 24 h of life in patients whose care is supported by the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>329</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>333</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/335?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acupuncture: a treatment for breakthrough pain in cancer?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/335?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Context</st>
<p>Patients with chronic cancer pain frequently suffer severe exacerbations of pain intensity which are difficult to control adequately via pharmaceutical management. Management of these episodes of breakthrough pain (BTP) presents a challenge both to the physician and the patient, and supplemental &lsquo;rescue&rsquo; doses of opioids required to control BTP can produce intolerable side-effects and often do not act rapidly enough to provide adequate analgesia. There is very little evidence to support the use of acupuncture for BTP in cancer and few studies have considered the rapidity of the analgesic response to acupuncture for any type of pain. However, the available physiological evidence provides a convincing rationale and one which warrants research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The objective of this paper is to debate the available physiological evidence for a rapid analgesic response to acupuncture in the context of the needs of the patient with cancer BTP, current interventions, acupuncture technique and the practical considerations involved in administering treatment rapidly and safely.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Current evidence suggests that acupuncture has the potential to produce rapid and effective analgesia when needles are inserted deeply enough and manipulated sufficiently. For cancer BTP this represents a possible adjunctive treatment, and consideration should be given to administering acupuncture alongside &lsquo;rescue&rsquo; doses of medication to &lsquo;kick-start&rsquo; the analgesic response before the medication takes effect. However, research is needed to provide evidence that acupuncture is effective for BTP in cancer, and the feasibility, practicality and safety of patients administering acupuncture themselves must also be taken into account.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paley, C. A., Johnson, M. I., Bennett, M. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000066</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000066</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Hospice, Pain (palliative care), Pain (anaesthesia), Complementary medicine, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acupuncture: a treatment for breakthrough pain in cancer?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>335</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>338</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/339?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The law looks at assisted dying]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/339?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Branthwaite, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare.2011.159574.rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare.2011.159574.rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Coma and raised intracranial pressure, End of life decisions (palliative care), Suicide (psychiatry), Assisted dying, End of life decisions (ethics), Homicide, Suicide (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The law looks at assisted dying]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Republished review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>339</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>342</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/343?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review of current international guidelines and initiatives]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/343?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a relentlessly progressive neurodegenerative condition. Optimal management requires a palliative approach from diagnosis with emphasis on patient autonomy, dignity and quality of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To conduct a systematic analysis of the type, level and timing of specialist palliative care intervention in ALS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Despite an international consensus that ALS management should adopt a multidisciplinary approach, integration of palliative care into ALS management varies considerably across health care systems. Late referral to palliative services in ALS is not uncommon and may impact negatively on the quality of life of ALS patients and their caregivers. However, common themes and principles of engagement can be identified across different jurisdictions, and measurement systems have been established that can assess the impact of palliative care intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There is considerable evidence that palliative care intervention improves quality of life in patients and carers. International consensus guidelines would assist in the development of a framework for active palliative care engagement in ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bede, P., Oliver, D., Stodart, J., van den Berg, L., Simmons, Z., Brannagain, D. O., Borasio, G. D., Hardiman, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare.2010.232637.rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare.2010.232637.rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health policy, Drugs: CNS (not psychiatric), Motor neurone disease, Neuromuscular disease, Spinal cord, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review of current international guidelines and initiatives]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Republished review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>343</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>348</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/349?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How practical are transmucosal fentanyl products for breakthrough cancer pain? novel use of placebo formulations to survey user opinion]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/349?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Three transmucosal fentanyl products have recently been licensed for cancer-related breakthrough pain: a sublingual tablet, a buccal/sublingual tablet and a nasal spray. Limited comparative data hinder identifying the most appropriate to use and adopt onto a service formulary. However, the availability of placebo formulations provides a unique opportunity to compare the practical aspects of their use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>30 patients with cancer accessed and administered a placebo of each product and were asked to rate them using 1&ndash;7 Likert agree&ndash;disagree scales and free-text responses, with regard to ease of access and administration, palatability and overall impression. Participants rated their usual rescue analgesic similarly, based on recall. They also indicated whether they would be prepared to use the fentanyl product, and their most preferred.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>For accessibility, the usual rescue analgesic was rated best (median score 3), significantly better than the buccal/sublingual tablet (p=0.01) and nasal spray (p&lt;0.01), but not the sublingual tablet. Conversely, the nasal spray was rated significantly worse (median score 7) than the others (p&lt;0.01). For ease of administration, the usual rescue analgesic and sublingual tablet were rated equally best (median score 1), with only the latter being significantly different to the buccal/sublingual tablet (p=0.04) and nasal spray (p=0.05). For palatability, the sublingual tablet was rated the best (median score 2), but was significantly different only to the buccal/sublingual tablet (p&lt;0.01). For overall impression, the sublingual tablet was rated significantly better (median score 3) than the others, with more patients prepared to use it and selecting it as their most preferred (27 and 18, respectively).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This survey provides valuable insight into the practical aspects of these three transmucosal fentanyl products for practitioners considering their use.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[England, R., Maddocks, M., Manderson, C., Zadora-Chrzastowska, S., Wilcock, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000037</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000037</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Hospice, Pain (palliative care), Pain (anaesthesia), Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How practical are transmucosal fentanyl products for breakthrough cancer pain? novel use of placebo formulations to survey user opinion]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>349</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>351</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/352?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[My strike-a-light]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/3/352?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birtwhistle, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000141</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000141</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology, Competing interests (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[My strike-a-light]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poem</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>352</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>352</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/113?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative care development in Africa: how can we provide enough quality care?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/113?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Powell, R. A., Mwangi-Powell, F. N., Kiyange, F., Radbruch, L., Harding, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000101</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000101</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Infectious diseases, Epidemiologic studies, Immunology (including allergy), Drugs: cardiovascular system, Pain (neurology), Stroke, Paediatric oncology, Child health, Hospice, Pain (palliative care), Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Sexual health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative care development in Africa: how can we provide enough quality care?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>113</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>114</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How can we improve palliative care provision for older people? Global perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gott, M., Ingleton, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000088</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000088</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Memory disorders (psychiatry), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How can we improve palliative care provision for older people? Global perspectives]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>116</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/117?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editor's choice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/117?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noble, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000113</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000113</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Editor's choice, Lung cancer (oncology), Screening (oncology), Hospice, Lung cancer (respiratory medicine), Clinical diagnostic tests, Competing interests (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editor's choice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>117</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/118?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative care in Africa since 2005: good progress, but much further to go]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/118?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>There has been rapid progress in palliative care in Africa since the World Health Assembly in 2005 which identified palliative care as an urgent humanitarian need. Palliative care is now recognised as a basic human right, and momentum has gathered to translate this into action. From being significantly present in only five countries in 2004, palliative care is now delivered in nearly 50% of African countries. Even so, still less than 5% of people in need currently receive it, and with an estimated 300% increase in the need for palliative care for people with non-communicable diseases over the next 20 years, and with those living with HIV needing more prolonged support, the demand for palliative care will continue to outpace supply. African countries adopting a public health approach and networking together through palliative care associations are beginning to embed and integrate palliative care into health systems and communities. Current challenges are to increase coverage while maintaining quality, to develop dynamic and flexible responses to the changing illness patterns in Africa, and to counter false beliefs. Resourcefulness and harnessing new technologies such as mobile phones while respecting cultural traditions, may be the way forward. The authors review recent progress in policy, service provision and training initiatives in Africa, illustrate the current situation at grass roots level from a recent evaluation of programmes in Kenya, Malawi and Uganda, analyse the current urgent challenges and suggest some ways ahead.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant, L., Downing, J., Namukwaya, E., Leng, M., Murray, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000057</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000057</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Infectious diseases, Immunology (including allergy), Hospice, Sexual health, Human rights]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative care in Africa since 2005: good progress, but much further to go]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>118</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>122</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/123?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation' discussions at the point of discharge: a case note review of hospice practice following local integrated policy implementation]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/123?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>An integrated &lsquo;Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation&rsquo; (DNACPR) policy was implemented across Lothian in 2006 (for ease of reading the terminology &lsquo;DNACPR&rsquo; has been used throughout the paper where the original Lothian Policy used &lsquo;DNAR&rsquo;). Patients were, for the first time, able to be discharged home with their DNACPR form after discussion about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To ascertain the number of patients who, following a discussion, were discharged with a DNACPR form and the reasons for not holding discussions with certain patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Two retrospective case note reviews of 50 patients discharged over two 4-month periods (2007 and 2009).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There was a high proportion (78&ndash;80%) of CPR discussions for patients discharged from the hospice. Reasons for not discussing CPR were: potential for excess distress (10&ndash;12% 2007 and 2009) and lack of time (4% both years). Of those discussing CPR on discharge, 90% took forms home in both years. The reasons patients did not take forms home were: form not taken in error (two patients in 2007); patients refusing a form at home (one and three patients in 2007 and 2009); form to be arranged by general practitioner and one incomplete discussion. The proportion of patients with forms already at home increased from 10% (2007) to 28% (2009).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>It is possible to discuss CPR with a high proportion of hospice patients prior to discharge from a hospice. Following the introduction of an integrated policy, more patients have DNACPR forms prior to admission. Most patients receiving specialist palliative care find DNACPR discussions acceptable and understand the benefits of having a DNACPR form.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hall, C. C., Mark, K., Oxenham, D., Spiller, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000094</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000094</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Interventional cardiology, Hospice, Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation' discussions at the point of discharge: a case note review of hospice practice following local integrated policy implementation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>123</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>126</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/127?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[News and updates from palliativedrugs.com]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/127?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilcock, A., Charlesworth, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000108</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000108</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Hospice, Venous thromboembolism, Medical error/ patient safety]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[News and updates from palliativedrugs.com]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>127</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>128</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/129?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Compassionate community networks: supporting home dying]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/129?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>How may communities be mobilised to help someone dying at home? This conceptual article outlines the thinking behind an innovative compassionate community project being developed at Weston-super-Mare, UK. In this project, a health professional mentors the dying person and their carer to identify and match: (a) the tasks that need to be done and (b) the members of their social network who might help with these tasks. Network members may subsequently join a local volunteer force to assist others who are network poor. Performing practical tasks may be more acceptable to some family, friends and neighbours than having to engage in a conversation about dying, and provides a familiarity with dying that is often lacking in modern societies, so in this model, behavioural change <I>precedes</I> attitudinal change. The scheme rejects a service delivery model of care in favour of a community development model, but differs from community development schemes in which the mentor is a volunteer rather than a health professional, and also from those approaches that strive to build community capacity before any one individual dying person is helped. The pros and cons of each approach are discussed. There is a need for evaluation of this and similar schemes, and for basic research into naturally occurring resource mobilisation at the end of life.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abel, J., Bowra, J., Walter, T., Howarth, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000068</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000068</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Sociology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Compassionate community networks: supporting home dying]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>129</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>133</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/134?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Articles of interest in other scholarly journals]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/134?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boland, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000111</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000111</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neurogastroenterology, Clinical trials (epidemiology), Epidemiologic studies, Psychogeriatrics, Memory disorders (neurology), Drugs: CNS (not psychiatric), Pain (neurology), Hospice, Memory disorders (psychiatry), Psychiatry of old age, Radiology, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Osteoporosis, Clinical diagnostic tests, Radiology (diagnostics), Trauma, Calcium and bone, Injury]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Articles of interest in other scholarly journals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short cuts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>134</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>134</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/135?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospital cancer deaths: late diagnosis and missed opportunity]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/135?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To establish factors that influence and contribute to the death of patients with cancer in acute hospitals in Northern Ireland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective clinical note review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>16 acute hospitals, covering 5 Health and Social Care Trusts across Northern Ireland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>793 adult patients with cancer who died in an acute hospital between July and December 2007 identified through the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry. Information was available for 695 (88%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Thee main reasons for acute hospital deaths were uncovered. First, 26.3% of patients were diagnosed with cancer during their last hospital admission. These patients were significantly different from the rest of the sample in being older, not partnered, having more comorbidities and fewer hospital admissions in their last year of life (all p&lt;0.001). Second, patients were very ill with 78.7% admitted as an emergency, requiring medical attention as a result of cancer-related (37.4%) and urgent physical symptoms (33.5%). Third, despite 38.3% of patients specifically requesting discharge to their usual residence, hospice or other hospital, this was not achieved. For 76.3%, this was owing to a deterioration in their medical condition. However for 12.4% there was a lack of a suitable bed, a care package was not in place for 4.9% and 3.0% lacked the required family support. In addition, preferred place of death was only recorded for 41% of patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Late diagnosis of cancer is a problem which requires further research. Training should be in place to ensure that a patient's preferred place of death is discussed, recorded and made part of routine end of life care. To achieve this, all medical staff should know when a patient is dying. Further research is required to establish what enables patients with cancer to die at home.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blaney, J., Crawford, G., Elder, T., Johnston, G., Gavin, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000036</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000036</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Editor's choice, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospital cancer deaths: late diagnosis and missed opportunity]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>135</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>139</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/140?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence, course and associations of desire for hastened death in a UK palliative population: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/140?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine the prevalence, severity and remission of desire for hastened death (DHD) in a UK representative sample of patients with advanced disease receiving palliative care and to examine the associations of desire for death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional survey with 4-week follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>St Christopher's Hospice, Sydenham, South London, which is a large hospice with homecare, outpatient and inpatient facilities serving five London boroughs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>300 patients newly referred to the hospice for palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The Desire for Death Rating Scale (DDRS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At T1 33/300 (11%) reported DHD and 11/300 (3.7%) had more serious or pervasive DHD. Of those who expressed DHD at T1 and were interviewed at both time points, 35% no longer reported these thoughts. Of those who reported no DHD at T1, 8% reported DHD at T2. The majority of those who had more severe DHD at T1 had a reduced DHD score by T2. Factors associated with T1 DHD included presence of non-malignant disease, depression, more severe physical symptoms, hopelessness and perceived loss of dignity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The prevalence of DHD was at the lower end of that seen in previous studies using similar samples. More severe DHD was uncommon and for most part remitted to some extent during the study. The provision of symptom control and timely detection and intervention for depression coupled with a focus on optimising function, instilling hope and preserving dignity are likely to contribute to alleviation of DHD in patients with advanced illness.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Price, A., Lee, W., Goodwin, L., Rayner, L., Humphreys, R., Hansford, P., Sykes, N., Monroe, B., Higginson, I., Hotopf, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000011</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000011</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence, course and associations of desire for hastened death in a UK palliative population: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>148</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/149?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sources of spiritual well-being in advanced cancer]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/149?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To test a conceptual model of sources of spiritual well-being in patients facing life-limiting disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>747 patients with stage IV gastrointestinal, breast, genitourinary or gynaecological cancer, or stage IIIA, IIIB or IV lung cancer, recruited from 2002 to 2008.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measure</st>
<p>Spiritual well-being as assessed by the FACIT-Sp-12.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Using structural equation modelling, spiritual well-being was specified as being predicted by religiosity, self-esteem, social relatedness and the physical burden of disease. The model had a good fit, Comparative Fit Index=0.96, Non-normed Fit Index=0.94, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.057. Standardised path coefficients relating each factor to spiritual well-being were as follows: religiosity 0.50, social relatedness 0.28, self-esteem 0.26 and physical burden &ndash;0.11.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The authors confirmed our theoretical model in which spiritual well-being is positively associated with religiosity, self-esteem and social relatedness, and is negatively associated with physical suffering. Our findings support a multidimensional approach to spiritual well-being that addresses not only religious issues, but also pain and symptom control, and the potentially damaging effects of advanced disease on self-worth and close relationships. The spiritually informed clinical encounter may be one in which sufficient time and opportunity for reflection are afforded to consider illness trajectories and treatment decisions in the context of religious beliefs and personal values, self-worth, support systems and concerns about dependency.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lo, C., Zimmermann, C., Gagliese, L., Li, M., Rodin, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000005</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000005</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Lung cancer (oncology), Lung cancer (respiratory medicine)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sources of spiritual well-being in advanced cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>149</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>153</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/154?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The social difficulties of cancer patients of South Asian Indian and Pakistani origin: a cross-sectional questionnaire and interview study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/154?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate, in a sample of patients of South Asian (SA) origin, the acceptability of introducing assessment of social difficulties in everyday practice, examine the range and severity of reported social difficulties and inquire about their management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study in which participants completed the Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI-21) in English, Urdu, Punjabi or Hindi followed by a semi-structured interview.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants comprised 26 men and 29 women of SA origin ranging between 18 and 80 years of age. The commonest primary languages were Urdu (n=17) and Punjabi (n=17). English was the primary language of three participants. A range of cancer diagnoses and stages of disease were represented.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Patients were recruited from outpatient haematology and oncology clinics in Bradford, Airedale and Leeds hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>SA cancer patients welcomed routine assessment of social difficulties as part of their cancer care. They reported higher levels of social distress than found in earlier studies of white British patients. The majority managed their social difficulties themselves with little discussion with the clinical team, although, at times, this would have been welcomed. SA patients lacked information and were unaware of the support available to them, especially when language was a barrier.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Introduction of routine assessment of social difficulties into cancer care will require not only relevant and accessible screening tools such as the SDI-21, but also staff trained to respond to the difficulties disclosed, with knowledge of information sources and supportive care services when patients request these.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dharni, N., Hanif, N., Bradley, C., Velikova, G., Stark, D., Wright, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000013</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000013</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Screening (oncology), Screening (epidemiology), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The social difficulties of cancer patients of South Asian Indian and Pakistani origin: a cross-sectional questionnaire and interview study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>161</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/162?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring health professionals' views regarding the optimum physical environment for palliative and end of life care in the acute hospital setting: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/162?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Limited evidence exists relating to key elements of the optimum physical hospital environment for patients receiving palliative and end of life care in acute hospitals. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of health professionals regarding the optimum physical environment for palliative and end of life care in the acute hospital setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Qualitative focus group study with 24 health professionals from an acute hospital, a community hospital and a hospice.</p>
<p>Findings Participants agreed that provision of appropriate privacy options was key to achieving an optimum physical environment. However, there was little consensus as to whether single room accommodation or multi-bed accommodation was the most appropriate. A comfortable and homely environment is important, but difficult to achieve in a clinically focused environment. The hospital environment may also be suboptimal for staff provision of care. The environmental needs of families should be considered alongside the needs of patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Many deficiencies exist in physical hospital environments for patients at the end of life. However, changes to the hospital environment are limited by resource restrictions, increasing rules and regulations, and a focus on clinical aspects of care. Further research is needed to establish patient and family views about the optimum physical hospital environment, to explore ways in which an appropriate environment can be most effectively achieved and to ensure engagement with planners, designers and stakeholders when commissioning new hospitals or renovating existing facilities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gardiner, C., Brereton, L., Gott, M., Ingleton, C., Barnes, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000045</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000045</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Human rights]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring health professionals' views regarding the optimum physical environment for palliative and end of life care in the acute hospital setting: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>162</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>166</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/167?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transition to adult services for children and young people with palliative care needs: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/167?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the evidence on the transition process from child to adult services for young people with palliative care needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Child and adult services and interface between healthcare providers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients</st>
<p>Young people aged 13&ndash;24 years with palliative care conditions in the process of transition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Young people and their families' experiences of transition, the process of transition between services and its impact on continuity of care and models of good practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>92 studies included. Papers on transition services were of variable quality when applied to palliative care contexts. Most focussed on common life-threatening and life-limiting conditions. No standardised transition program identified and most guidelines used to develop transition services were not evidence-based. Most studies on transition programs were predominantly condition-specific (eg, cystic fibrosis (CF), cancer) services. CF services offered high-quality transition with the most robust empirical evaluation. There were differing condition-dependent viewpoints on when transition should occur but agreement on major principles guiding transition planning and probable barriers. There was evidence of poor continuity between child and adult providers with most originating from within child settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Palliative care was not, in itself, a useful concept for locating transition-related evidence. It is not possible to evaluate the merits of the various transition models for palliative care contexts, or their effects on continuity of care, as there are no long-term outcome data to measure their effectiveness. Use of validated outcome measures would facilitate research and service development.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug, M., Adi, Y., Williams, J., Paul, M., Kelly, D., Petchey, R., Carter, Y. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare.2009.163931rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare.2009.163931rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pancreas and biliary tract, Child health, Hospice, Cystic fibrosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transition to adult services for children and young people with palliative care needs: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Republished research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>167</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>173</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/174?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Living and dying with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: multi-perspective longitudinal qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/174?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To understand the perspectives of people with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as their illness progresses, and of their informal and professional carers, to inform provision of care for people living and dying with COPD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Up to four serial qualitative interviews were conducted with each patient and nominated carer over 18 months. Interviews were transcribed and analysed both thematically and as narratives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>21 patients, and 13 informal carers (a family member, friend, or neighbour) and 18 professional carers (a key health or social care professional) nominated by the patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary and secondary care in Lothian, Tayside, and Forth Valley, Scotland, during 2007-9.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eleven patients died during the study period. Our final dataset comprised 92 interviews (23 conducted with patient and informal carer together). Severe symptoms that caused major disruption to normal life were described, often in terms implying acceptance of the situation as a "way of life" rather than an "illness." Patients and their informal carers adapted to and accepted the debilitating symptoms of a lifelong condition. Professional carers' familiarity with the patients' condition, typically over many years, and prognostic uncertainty contributed to the difficulty of recognising and actively managing end stage disease. Overall, patients told a "chaos narrative" of their illness that was indistinguishable from their life story, with no clear beginning and an unanticipated end described in terms comparable with attitudes to death in a normal elderly population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings challenge current assumptions underpinning provision of end of life care for people with COPD. The policy focus on identifying a time point for transition to palliative care has little resonance for people with COPD or their clinicians and is counter productive if it distracts from early phased introduction of supportive care. Careful assessment of possible supportive and palliative care needs should be triggered at key disease milestones along a lifetime journey with COPD, in particular after hospital admission for an exacerbation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pinnock, H., Kendall, M., Murray, S. A., Worth, A., Levack, P., Porter, M., MacNee, W., Sheikh, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare.d142rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare.d142rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Living and dying with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: multi-perspective longitudinal qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Republished research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>174</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>183</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/184?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How common are palliative care needs among older people who die in the emergency department?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/184?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine the prevalence and nature of palliative care needs in people aged 65 years or more (65+) who die in emergency departments (EDs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This was a retrospective analysis of routine hospital data from two EDs in South London. Patients aged 65+ living in the hospitals' catchment area who died in the ED during a 1 year period (2006&ndash;2007) were included. Palliative care needs identified by diagnosis and symptoms, and problems likely to benefit from palliative care documented in clinical records 3 months prior to the final ED attendance were extracted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over 1 year, 102 people aged 65+ died in the ED, frequently following an acute event (n=90). 63.7% presented out of hours. 98/102 were admitted by ambulance, over half (n=59) from home. Half (n=50) had attended the same ED or been admitted to the same hospital in the previous 12 months. Over half (58/102) presented with diagnoses that signalled palliative care need. Of these, 29 had recorded symptoms a week before death and 28 had complex social issues 3 months prior to death. Only eight were known to palliative care services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There is considerable palliative care need among older people who ultimately died in the ED, of whom only a minority were known to palliative care services in this study. Previous ED and hospital admission suggest opportunities for referral and forward planning. More older people in need of palliative care must be identified and managed earlier to avoid future undesired admissions and deaths in hospital.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beynon, T., Gomes, B., Murtagh, F. E. M., Glucksman, E., Parfitt, A., Burman, R., Edmonds, P., Carey, I., Keep, J., Higginson, I. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare.2009.090019rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare.2009.090019rep</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How common are palliative care needs among older people who die in the emergency department?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Republished research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>188</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/189?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment of painful hypertrophic osteoarthropathy associated with non-small cell lung cancer with octreotide: a case report and review of the literature]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/189?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy (HOA) is a syndrome most commonly associated with non-small cell lung cancer and consists of periostitis, digital clubbing and painful polyarthropathy. Its symptoms may be disabling and are reportedly difficult to manage effectively with conventional analgesia. We present a case of a lung cancer patient with opioid resistant painful HOA in whom analgesia was achieved with octreotide.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birch, E., Jenkins, D., Noble, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000052</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000052</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Lung cancer (oncology), Pain (palliative care), Pain (anaesthesia), Lung cancer (respiratory medicine), Musculoskeletal syndromes, Calcium and bone]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment of painful hypertrophic osteoarthropathy associated with non-small cell lung cancer with octreotide: a case report and review of the literature]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>192</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/193?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Overcoming the challenges of bedside teaching in the palliative care setting]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/193?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Bedside teaching is the process of active learning in the presence of a patient and is one of the most traditional teaching techniques used in undergraduate medicine. Students and patients both appear to benefit from the experience of bedside teaching. However, bedside teaching with medical students and palliative care patients presents a number of challenges for the patient, the learner and the educator. Key considerations for bedside teaching in the palliative care context include: sensitivity to &lsquo;protection&rsquo;, of palliative care patients by colleagues in relation to their involvement in bedside teaching; consideration of the patient's carer/relative as they will often be present for prolonged periods at the bedside; a maximum of one or two students (not the &lsquo;up to six&rsquo; traditionally used in this type of teaching); multiple short encounters with several patients as opposed to a longer encounter with one patient; and sensitivity to the potential impact of the session on the learner as undergraduate medical students and junior doctors may find that while worthwhile and rewarding, the teaching session is also personally emotionally challenging.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harris, D. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000035</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000035</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Undergraduate]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Overcoming the challenges of bedside teaching in the palliative care setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Education</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>197</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/198-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: Governing death and loss: empowerment, involvement and participation]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/198-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gardiner, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000069</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000069</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Competing interests (ethics), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: Governing death and loss: empowerment, involvement and participation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>198</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>198</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/198-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Request]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/198-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hope, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000090</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000090</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology, Competing interests (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Request]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poem</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>198</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>198</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/199-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can oral history improve healthcare professionals understanding of patients in palliative care?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/199-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This presentation will consider the potential benefit of oral history in the context of medical and nurse education to aid a deeper understanding between patient and physician. We contend that oral history is a valid source of information for use in educating healthcare professionals through the reproduction of the authentic voice of the interviewee.</p>
<p>An oral history is a deeply personal account that expresses identity and explores meaning. When heard together with a clinical history there is potential for health professionals to gain knowledge of the variety of patients' experiences, deepening and broadening awareness of the process and consequences of disease. This understanding can enhance awareness of psychosocial matters and prepare them for clinical encounters in the future.</p>
<p>In palliative care, health professionals hear the concerns and distress of individual patients and carers by a process of active listening and structured questioning; their knowledge is synthesised from findings arising from population case studies and studies using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. While oral history makes no claim to be generalisable in a scientific sense, like other practices in the humanities, it does seek to describe the human condition. Oral histories are uncluttered by imposed theoretical frameworks or extrinsic interpretations and in this sense the patient has greater agency and the health professional can gain more rounded understandings.</p>
<p>The value of oral history to the health professional is that it allows communication with patients and carers that is unfiltered by a medical agenda. Accounts of patients' experience are put into context in a way that retains their individual voice and agency.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Winslow, M., Smith, S., Noble, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can oral history improve healthcare professionals understanding of patients in palliative care?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>199</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/199-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Care quality commission compliance and frequently asked questions]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/199-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>As part of the Department of Health initiative &ndash; &pound;30 million funding for children's palliative care in 2010/11, Children's Hospices UK successfully submitted a proposal with Help the Hospices relating to Care Quality Commission (CQC) registration and compliance with the statutory Essential Standards of Quality and Safety.</p>
<p>The project ran between December 2010 and March 2011 developing guidance and best practice examples for hospice services in England.</p>
<p>The project assisted children's and adult hospice services by providing information to:<l type="tab"><li><p> Inform future development and planning of services to ensure best practice</p>
</li><li>
<p> Identify current services and gaps in current compliance</p>
</li><li>
<p> Work with our partner &lsquo;Help the Hospices&rsquo; to share project outputs and support the transition agenda between children's and adult services.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The project required a mixed methodology to ensure effective delivery of the project objectives. Methodologies employed included an online questionnaire, stakeholder visits and interviews, delivery of three educational workshops, academic review of compliance techniques and partnership working with stakeholders to complete exemplar compliance assessments.</p>
<p>The project enabled a number of outputs and analysis and these were shared with member organisations via the extranet services of both Children's Hospices UK and Help the Hospices.</p>
<p><b>Outputs included</b>:<l type="tab"><li><p> Establishment of information relating to registered activities across hospice services</p>
</li><li>
<p> Provision of educational workshops led by the CQC in relation to compliance, inspection and the Judgement Framework</p>
</li><li>
<p> The development of a &lsquo;Compliance Toolkit&rsquo; providing information and advice relating to meeting the Essential Standards including exemplar compliance assessments</p>
</li><li>
<p> Partnership with &lsquo;Help the Hospices&rsquo; to further improve transition for life limited young people by understanding the population of children and young people with palliative care needs who will be moving to adult services.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The presentation will focus on some of the learning from this joint venture and consider next steps.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruthven, T., Blackburn, M., Ellis, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Care quality commission compliance and frequently asked questions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>199</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/199-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sharing clinical audit]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/199-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Clinical audit is a cyclical process that forms part of clinical governance and determines whether national standards are met and changes in practice have improved outcomes.</p>
<p>An audit group was established in 2008, to encourage healthcare professionals to undertake audits of practice, but there were a number of challenges:<l type="tab"><li><p> How to go from collecting the data to disseminating it and making it add value to day to day clinical practice?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How to inspire others to undertake audits?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How to share the results in an informative and constructive way?</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To ensure that hospice clinical audit results and recommendations were shared to as many healthcare professionals as possible to inform clinical practice</p>
</li><li>
<p> To inspire others to undertake audits and embed it as part of day to day activities.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A structured audit feedback meeting is held quarterly, open to all staff, volunteers and external healthcare professionals.</p>
<p>Following the feedback meeting a leaflet is designed and distributed to illustrate the presentation and actions to take forward.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Four feedback sessions have been held with an average of 4 audits being presented at each</p>
</li><li>
<p> Feedback sessions are lively and well attended</p>
</li><li>
<p> The results of audit are widely spread throughout the hospice &bull; Clinicians understand the audit process better</p>
</li><li>
<p> The number of audits has increased</p>
</li><li>
<p> Improvements to patient care have been identified in:</p>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Management plans in Hospice @ Home respite care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Improvement in documenting psychosocial information on the inpatient unit (IPU)</p>
</li><li>
<p> Identifying trends in patient falls.</p>
</li></l></p></li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Audit feedback sessions and leaflets have had a positive effect on clinician's understanding of the audit process and favourable outcomes in regard to their willingness to complete them, thus fulfiling one aspect of clinical governance while improving standards and patient care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skilton, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sharing clinical audit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>200</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/200-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gaining 'real-time' feedback to influence patient and family care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/200-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Gaining meaningful feedback about service user experience when patients are at the end of life can be difficult. The hospice through its relationship with the local primary care trust won a competition hosted by Picker Institute Europe and Fr3dom Health Solutions. The award enabled the development of patient, relative and public experience surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To design specific user experience surveys which are easy to administer, would provide meaningful feedback to enhance quality of care and inform future service developments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Five surveys were designed by clinical teams with the help of Picker Institute Europe. Surveys were designed to be relevant to each clinical area. Hospice volunteers were trained in administering the electronic surveys. A survey about the inpatient discharge process was administered through SMS text messaging. The community survey was administered in written format with an option to complete on-line.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Results are providing useful feedback on inpatient and family experience of involvement in decisions about care, dignity, choice in food and help in eating, cleanliness and noise of the environment. Community survey results are providing us with feedback on patient experience on the effectiveness of symptom management and public surveys have provided peoples views on access to and knowledge of the hospice. The informal verbal comments given to volunteers are helpful in seeking to meet needs not picked up by the survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Results are providing useful information about different aspects of our service, which may not have been possible using standard written surveys. Staff and patients have commented on the &lsquo;professionalism&rsquo; of the volunteers in administering the surveys and volunteers have enjoyed being involved in this project.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The use of bespoke surveys using electronic devices, administered by trained volunteers, is an effective way of gaining feedback from a variety of service users.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Horne, G., Biggs, J., Volunteers]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Quality improvement]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gaining 'real-time' feedback to influence patient and family care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>200</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>200</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/200-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prebereavement assessment: identifying vulnerability and resilience in parents of children with a life-limiting condition]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/200-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Understanding the ways parents cope with grief prebereavement is as important in the bereavement care pathway as how they may cope after death. Within a framework of practice development the authors identified, modified and piloted the Adult Attitude to Grief Scale (AAG) (Machin 2001) to assess how families were coping prebereavement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The aim of using the assessment tool was to enable parents to tell their story and to recognise and further understand their grief experience prebereavement; to identify what kind of support might be offered so that resources could be targeted more appropriately.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Literature review</p>
</li><li>
<p> Survey of children's hospices</p>
</li><li>
<p> Reflective diaries</p>
</li><li>
<p> Action learning groups within a framework of practice development to identify and modify the AAG scale</p>
</li><li>
<p> An initial pilot with 40 families</p>
</li><li>
<p> Evaluation to determine the ongoing integration of the tool in practice.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The assessment revealed a therapeutic value that enabled individuals to tell their story and parents reported a sense of being understood. Findings indicated those individuals who required additional support which helped in the management and provision of services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The pilot revealed two important dimensions:<l type="tab"><li><p> The impact on the organisation in relation to service procedures &ndash; this included implementing the tool in practice as well as the professional development of staff.</p>
</li><li>
<p> The assessment process encouraged a stronger therapeutic engagement with parents.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The modified AAG scale when used with parents can add significant information in understanding their grief experience prebereavement. The assessment alongside clinical judgement has enabled the identification of possible vulnerability as well as resilience, which can enable healthcare professionals to support families appropriately and target resources effectively.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hopper, L., Bennett, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prebereavement assessment: identifying vulnerability and resilience in parents of children with a life-limiting condition]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>200</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>200</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/200-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Learning from adult services: expert patients to expert parents]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/200-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A project funded under DH &pound;30 million for children's palliative care.</p>
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Expert Parents project was based on the adult expert patients programme to give self-confidence to adult patients to take responsibility for the management of their own long term condition while encouraging them to work collaboratively with health and social care professionals.</p>
<p>Haven House Children's Hospice and Interface (a parent led forum in Redbridge) worked together in partnership to deliver 30 knowledge and skills training sessions in 3 months across Redbridge. The project aimed to help parents manage their child's condition effectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The sessions aimed to empower, inform and educate parents/carers to become more expert in the care of their own children.</p>
<p>The project aimed to raise the profile of disabled children and views them to be both a local and national priority.</p>
<p>The project was aimed at all groups of children with disability and palliative care needs. The project aimed to provide knowledge, skills and information for parents about services so that they can make informed choices.</p>
<p>Information was provided about care pathways and transition.</p>
<p>The project aimed to build supportive relationships between parents and professionals</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Parents and carers completed a standard questionnaire to evaluate each session</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Parent's valued learning with other parents, gaining support and experience diminished isolation. They had an increased awareness of the services available and started to develop a new network of contacts. There were 287 attendances by parents/carers overall.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>It was felt that the sessions allowed parents to open up and discuss issues, gave them hope for the future and made them feel positive. The project surpassed the expectations of the project team.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Many parents requested further training and highly rated the value of their sessions to become Expert parents.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Twomey, C., Busk, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Disability]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Learning from adult services: expert patients to expert parents]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>200</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>201</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/201-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Home based volunteers - bridging the gap between respite visits]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/201-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The project was conceived as a result of two observations. The hospice receives many applications from people keen to volunteer directly with children and young adults. Secondly the Care Team and Family Support Team observe that often simple practical matters can overwhelm families with a life limited child.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Practical and emotional support provided by volunteers could be a cost efficient means to offer ongoing support between hospice respite stays. The project both fulfills our vision that, "No child or young person with a life-shortening condition should journey alone or unsupported," and considers the DH's end of life strategy championing the "Preferred Place of Care."</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patient and family demand for home based volunteers was ascertained using a survey and semi-structured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>31% of service users responded, of which 97% (60 families) welcomed volunteer support at home. Numerous needs were identified that could be met by volunteers.</p>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Practical services &ndash; gardening, laundry or cleaning &ndash; especially during difficult times such as hospital admissions or another illness in the family</p>
</li><li>
<p> Befriending &ndash; supporting the family on outings, spending quality time with siblings or the patient</p>
</li><li>
<p> Specialist services &ndash; legal advice, for example, arranging power of attorney or writing a will, hairdressing, massage.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Recommendations for service development</st>
<p>Findings indicate that a home volunteer co-ordinator is essential to match volunteers with families appropriately, liaise with other hospice teams and support volunteers. To ensure the safety of the scheme risk assessments, managing families expectations and an extensive volunteer training and support programme will be necessary.</p>
<p>Project evaluation will involve eliciting feedback from volunteers, patients and families on the impact of home based volunteering. It is hoped that home volunteers will relieve the burden on families with a life limited young person reducing isolation, depression and anxiety and encouraging normalisation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cook, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics), End of life decisions (palliative care), Child and adolescent psychiatry, Physiotherapy, Sports and exercise medicine, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Home based volunteers - bridging the gap between respite visits]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>201</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>201</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/201-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[User involvement in establishing a new young people's hospice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/201-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We propose that this presentation will involve life limited young people who have shaped a new hospice service for teenagers and young adults.</p>
<p>Transition from children's to adult services is much discussed, little understood and poorly supported. It poses a set of unique challenges for life limited young people.</p>
<p>Prime among these is the sharp discontinuity, described by many as like "falling off a cliff". The aim of the consultations was to shape a new service was to provide stability and continuity while facilitating transition across external health and social services.</p>
<p>By engaging user groups in a series of semi structured discussions, their needs were better understood and a new hospice service was established to support them. Each themed discussion had a facilitator. The format was kept loose to allow subjects to emerge that were important to the young people. In addition to focus groups of communicative users, carers were consulted on behalf of non-communicators, and there was a joint carer/young person session.</p>
<p>The results were that information was gathered on both physical and emotional needs. Three themes emerged; independence, dignity and privacy. In some areas, the young people's views were at odds with other stakeholders, such as parents/cares and care professionals. It became apparent that young people's aspirations are often drowned out by carers and professionals.</p>
<p>Because the new hospice was founded on user involvement, it now provides a safe space for honest and open discussions. As trust is built, more profound subjects, such as relationships with peers and parents, advance care plans, death of friends and anxiety about sharing bad news, are being brought out.</p>
<p>The best source of information for shaping young people's service is the young people themselves. Developing best practice, based on both their hopes and needs is a rewarding journey for all concerned</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kipling, R., Amos, V., Goldsmith, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[User involvement in establishing a new young people's hospice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>201</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>201</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/202-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Part of the team? The experiences of support staff in British hospices]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/202-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>British hospices employ a wide range of support staff to provide services to patients and families. Support workers make an enormous contribution to the success of the organisation in which they work; however, little previous research has focused on these staff. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of support staff in relation to their roles and relationships with other groups of hospice staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 support workers from two hospices in the North West of England. Participants included gardening, maintenance, clerical, domestic and kitchen staff. Two managers were also interviewed to explore their views of support workers in the hospice. Site visits and non-participant observation were carried out in both hospices. A thematic analysis of the interview and observational data was conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Support workers perceived their roles to be vital to the care offered to patients and families. They reported substantial interaction with patients and families, and put patients' needs first. They were willing to be flexible in carrying out their duties, recognising the need to show consideration to patients and families, who they believed valued their contribution. However, although support staff perceived themselves as an important part of the wider hospice team, they sometimes experienced isolation and division from other staff groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In some cases support staff felt that they were invisible workers within the hospice. Despite the importance they and their managers placed on their roles, this was not always reflected in the acknowledgement and appreciation they received, nor in support and training offered to them. In order to fully utilise this group of staff, their roles and contribution to patient care need to be acknowledged by hospices.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Turner, M., Hemmings, R., Payne, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Part of the team? The experiences of support staff in British hospices]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>202</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>202</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/202-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[RACE (Rapid Access to Carers at End of Life)]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/202-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Rapid Access to Carers at End of Life service aims to provide a rapid response Hospice at Home night service for the whole of Worcestershire for patients at the end of life when all other appropriate sources of support are unavailable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To provide support for carers who are struggling to cope and so enable patients to remain at home</p>
</li><li>
<p> To prevent avoidable admissions and readmissions to hospital and to enable rapid discharges</p>
</li><li>
<p> To allow time to review and establish suitable packages of care To support district nursing teams at times of patient crisis by providing rapidly accessible end of life nursing care.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Carers are on-call to provide care at any time of the night. Requests for shifts will be generated by a District Nurse or Community Practitioner who will have completed a risk assessment of the patient and home environment. The service will provide care up until an alternative care package is arranged, up to a maximum of 48 h.</p>
<p>Success will be analysed by the number shifts provided, feedback from patients, patients' families and referrers to the service and analysis of intervention outcomes, for example number of admissions avoided or discharges expedited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The feedback we have had from referrers and patients has been positive and supportive of the scheme. We have received a total of 41 referrals which resulted in the provision of a total of 61 nights of care which equates to over 535 h of patient support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Current conclusions</st>
<p>Initial findings suggest that the service will continue to expand and the number of referrals increase as the Community Practitioners and other referring staff become more familiar with the service. This is a 6 month pilot and we will be conducting a full evaluation at the end of this period.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biggs, J., Westwood, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[RACE (Rapid Access to Carers at End of Life)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>202</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>202</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/202-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a current 24/7 service provided by a community palliative care team]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/202-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The &lsquo;End of Life Care Strategy&rsquo; recommends the importance of 24/7 community support enabling people to be cared for in their place of choice. The hospice has provided this service since 1986. The service provides support for patients, carers and healthcare professionals. Literature shows that there is little research into out of hours (OOHs)palliative care provision.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To evaluate a long established service by exploring views of stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A qualitative approach through focus groups, structured, semi-structured, telephone and face to face interviews. A purposive sample was used to select specific stakeholders. Interviews and focus groups with clinicians from the hospice and local district nursing teams, GP service representatives and hospice in patient unit staff. Analysis of key documents; service level agreements with PCTs, operational policy and record book of all contacts made to the service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Total number of calls received 614</p>
</li><li>
<p> Weekend/Bank Holiday calls 401</p>
</li><li>
<p> On call calls 213</p>
</li><li>
<p> Visits undertaken 34.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Primary reason for calls from healthcare professionals was for symptom management with 35.91% (weekend/bank holiday) from district nursing staff. 58.39% of calls were from carers.</p>
<p>Stakeholders were positive about the present service model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>There were recurring themes around more effective cross service boundary communication and improved knowledge and skills transfer to improve community staff competence and confidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The service model used is valuable for community healthcare professionals, patients and carers. The service responds to need and provides continuity of care over the weekend/bank holiday and OOHs period. Data collected from hospice nursing, medical staff and local healthcare providers ascertains what works well in practice with recommendations towards potential service development and improvement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O'Halloran, H., Hetherington, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a current 24/7 service provided by a community palliative care team]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>202</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>202</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/203-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enriching the experience of patients on a hospice ward with volunteer carers]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/203-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>We are working in a difficult global economic climate, increasingly caring for patients with complex needs. As a local charity we need to make best use of our resources, spend donated money in the most responsible manner while continuing to expand patient care services, maintaining the highest quality of patient focused care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To develop volunteers to undertake clinical activity and enhance the inpatient experience, making better use of all resources.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The ward volunteers were approached with a proposal to expand their role. The staff were informed of the plans and their concerns addressed at an early stage; they were involved throughout the project.</p>
<p>The plan followed was:<l type="tab"><li><p> A consultative approach</p>
</li><li>
<p> Volunteer skills portfolios developed</p>
</li><li>
<p> Ward competencies, supervised practice and classroom based training for volunteers</p>
</li><li>
<p> Initial focus &ndash; patient nutrition and oral care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Subsequent introduction of hygiene care.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>An increasingly confident and flexible volunteer workforce with more involvement in clinical patient care. An efficient use of resources, releasing staff to focus on complex aspects of care, Volunteers are now offering ward administrative support, helping patients with creative activities and are becoming integral to all aspects of ward activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion and conclusion</st>
<p>Developing volunteers in this way has taken investment of time and staff resources, resulting in an increased richness to the inpatient environment. Volunteers now utilise other skills so that they can participate more fully in the ward domain. Ward nurses now appreciate the volunteer input and rely on their presence; the changes have enhanced our skill-mix and increased our staff: patient ratios.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carpenter, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enriching the experience of patients on a hospice ward with volunteer carers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>203</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/203-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Partnership working to deliver seven day access to specialist palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/203-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Provision of 7-day specialist palliative care services in all care settings has been identified as a key standard for statutory sector providers for a number of years. In 2009, in response to the recommendations of the All Wales Palliative Care Review and the Palliative Care Implementation Board, a Ministerial Letter was issued throughout Wales, requiring implementation of 7-day working for specialist palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>This paper will firstly, discuss the development of partnership working between a statutory sector specialist palliative care team (SPCT) and independent sector Hospice to deliver 7 day access to specialist palliative care assessment and intervention, across all healthcare settings; secondly, it will discuss the benefits for patients, families, services, the wider health community and economy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The SPCT Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNS) base their service from the Hospice at weekends and Bank Holidays, where out of hour's advice calls from primary and secondary care have historically been received. This decision was made to support safe lone working, governance, access to medical and hospice support for CNS's, and streamline access to the service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Evaluation of this initiative provides evidence of:<l type="tab"><li><p> Closer integration and team working</p>
</li><li>
<p> Rapid access to specialist palliative care, across primary and secondary care, improving outcomes and experiences for patients and their families, and increasing quality and standards of care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Access to hospice inpatient admission for patients requiring urgent transfer into a specialist palliative care bed, at weekends and Bank Holidays</p>
</li><li>
<p> Prevention of unscheduled acute hospital admissions</p>
</li><li>
<p> Support for providers of general palliative care, throughout primary and secondary care.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Partnership working between the SPCT and Hospice has enabled an innovative approach to the delivery of 7 day working that benefits patients, their families, and service providers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foster, A., Livingstone, T., Cadell, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Partnership working to deliver seven day access to specialist palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>203</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/203-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Helping the developing world.....the story of an outward looking hospice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/203-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A hospice in the UK became linked with Africa when one of the medical staff left in 2001 to set up a hospice in Tanzania. The aim was to extend some of the ethos and philosophy of the hospice movement to the developing world. The link has involved six staff visits from the UK to Tanzania and six staff visits the other way. These visits have been of great benefit to both sides. A description of this link won an essay prize from the Tropical Health Education Trust in 2007.</p>
<p>The original hospice in Tanzania has been the centre for a roll out programme, using the Help the Hospices Toolkit and mentoring, to set up teams in many other district and regional hospitals. The UK hospice has encouraged this mentorship by allowing their staff sabbaticals to assist in setting up palliative care teams, to give confidence in prescribing morphine and help in making community links to establish home visiting. The latest Tanzanian hospital to receive mentorship has been the control site in research, as yet unpublished, showing the difference that palliative care training makes to the quality of life of patients in HIV care and treatment.</p>
<p>The benefits of this link to Tanzania are obvious, education, books, equipment and experience but those to the UK hospice are less immediately evident. For the staff, they include life changing experiences, and relationships, for patients and relatives, the distraction of hearing about the struggle to get palliative care and pain relief into the developing world. Hospices have often been inward looking, patient orientated places that need to raise funds and keep up standards but this need not preclude involvement worldwide. This link is a replicable model that proves the benefits can be mutual without jeopardising standards or fund raising at home.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collins, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Infectious diseases, Immunology (including allergy), Pain (neurology), Hospice, Sexual health, Health education, Health promotion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Helping the developing world.....the story of an outward looking hospice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>203</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/203-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bridging the gaps: a hospice's response to the needs of people living with advanced heart failure]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/203-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Problem identified</st>
<p>Heart failure (HF) affects millions of people worldwide in almost epidemic proportions with higher morbidity and mortality than many cancers presenting a major burden on individuals, families and healthcare resources. The unpredictable nature makes HF difficult to manage, to identify when referral to supportive and palliative care (PC) is appropriate, and when end of life is nearing. The national agenda is beginning to acknowledge the importance of addressing these issues. Healthcare professionals need to adapt their care, practice and services to reflect this. Work is required to address the common misconception that Hospices are only for people dying from cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Solution</st>
<p>A major grant from Help the Hospices and The Burdett Trust enabled an inner-city hospice to employ a Heart Failure Nurse Specialist to address the above issues. The work aims to:<l type="tab"><li><p> Improve awareness of benefits and appropriateness of supportive and PC within the HF community (patients and professionals)</p>
</li><li>
<p> Establish a new model of care to suit clients needs and illness trajectory</p>
</li><li>
<p> Establish joint working and shared learning opportunities between PC and HF professionals</p>
</li><li>
<p> Development of a HF Wellbeing Clinic (HFWBC) opening access to the Hospice, introducing support and services earlier in patients' pathway.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>The project already has significant findings:<l type="tab"><li><p> Patients with suspected HF are referred to the hospice with advanced symptoms prior to formal diagnosis or treatment optimisation as per NICE guidelines</p>
</li><li>
<p> HF patients have embraced the HFWBC and other hospice services</p>
</li><li>
<p> Communication and collaboration is improving between PC and HF professionals.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>The project plans to:<l type="tab"><li><p> Re-audit referral patterns, numbers and patient outcomes for HF patients</p>
</li><li>
<p> Conduct training needs analysis to formally highlight gaps in knowledge</p>
</li><li>
<p> Develop a trigger tool and referral pathway into PC services</p>
</li><li>
<p> Review of alternative models of care.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Longton, K., Laverty, D., Richardson, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Drugs: cardiovascular system, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bridging the gaps: a hospice's response to the needs of people living with advanced heart failure]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>204</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/204-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Motor neuron disease and music therapy - a holistic approach]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/204-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a case study presentation of working through music therapy with a 66 year-old lady (L)who has been living with motor neuron disease (MND) for 5 years. At the start of the therapy sessions she had already reached the stage of tetra paresis and was increasingly concerned about her deteriorating speech and breathing and felt hopeless as well as helpless.</p>
<p>Searches reveal very little of the potential role of music therapy in MND &ndash; this presentation will open up the possibility of working through music in several different ways with people who live with this progressive life-limiting condition.</p>
<p>As a former healthcare professional with 20 years experience of working with people with MND, L is uniquely placed to comment on the benefits of music therapy on all aspects of her life &ndash; physiological, psychological, emotional, social and spiritual.</p>
<p>She felt her voice control improved through singing and she was able to reduce night time panic about her breathing by using musical relaxation techniques. L will describe in her own words the subsequent far-reaching effects of the music therapy sessions.</p>
<p>DVD clips and audio recordings will provide evidence of her musical creativity &ndash; she had never composed music before but over a 6 month period was able to write a significant amount of choral music. The initial motivation was to leave a legacy for the family at her funeral &ndash; what resulted was a joyful service of thanksgiving with her family and friends in which everyone heard the beautiful music she had written.</p>
<p>Through her powerful and moving testimony in words and music she shows how someone living with a condition that often seems overwhelmingly hopeless can experience great joy and creativity and reclaim a sense of purpose and achievement.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mackinnon, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other rehabilitative therapies, Motor neurone disease, Neuromuscular disease, Complementary medicine, Medical humanities]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Motor neuron disease and music therapy - a holistic approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>204</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>204</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/204-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The breathing space clinic: a pilot to support the holistic needs of patients with advanced COPD]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/204-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Breathing Space Clinic: a multi-disciplinary, inter-organisational hospice-based pilot clinic to support the holistic needs of patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p>
<p>Introduction: In contrast to many other conditions, mortality trends indicate that the prevalence of COPD is increasing. Studies show that COPD patients' symptoms are at least as severe as those of patients with lung cancer and that this group is underserved by specialist palliative care.</p>
<p>There are currently no reliable means of identifying when COPD patients enter their last year of life. Breathing Space combines the specialist expertise of both COPD-specific and palliative care teams to provide information, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, advance care planning etc. The clinic thus aims to maximise quality of life for patients with very severe disease in response to need rather than prognosis.</p>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>This presentation will outline the development and function of the Breathing Space Clinic, focusing on the rationale for our referral criteria and pathway.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Clinic development involved collaboration between the hospice, COPD patients, primary care teams and specialist respiratory teams across three London boroughs. It targets those patients with very severe COPD who have complex needs, including those arising from co-morbidities. Referral criteria are designed to reflect this approach and are grounded in an alternative model to that of palliative care provision for cancer patients. The referral pathway is designed to ensure NICE compliance. Relevant metrics are collected.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Our presentation will include reflection upon early data from the pilot.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Significant time and multi-disciplinary effort was required to develop the clinic concept to an operational level. Challenges were encountered in developing explicit referral criteria and these will be reviewed in light of the clinic metrics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Collaborative interventions have potential to greatly improve patient care but require commitment and learning from all involved.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hodson, M., Jennings, R., Martin, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Epidemiologic studies, General practice / family medicine, Lung cancer (oncology), Hospice, Airway biology, Lung cancer (respiratory medicine)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The breathing space clinic: a pilot to support the holistic needs of patients with advanced COPD]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>204</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>204</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/205-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Corneal donation in palliative care: a doctor's perspective]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/205-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Corneal donation is a possibility for many palliative care patients after death but anecdotal evidence suggests it is seldom done. Previous research in other settings (especially acute medical settings) suggest lack of knowledge and a negative attitude from staff contributing to low donation rates, rather than public refusal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To explore palliative care doctors' knowledge and attitudes about corneal donation and to find if any associations with corneal procurement exist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>A postal survey was conducted that tested knowledge of corneal donation and asked about attitude and behaviour (past experiences). A 14 item questionnaire was sent to 427 practising palliative care consultants and associate specialists in the UK. A response rate of 50% was achieved and the findings were analysed using SPSS software and thematic content analysis. The study showed that over half (57%) of doctors had an inadequate level of knowledge about corneal donation but did have a positive personal and professional attitude towards it. There was a statistically significant association between their personal and professional attitude (ie, either both would be positive or both negative) with a significant association between a positive attitude and a higher mean knowledge score. The most common perceived drawback of discussing donation was fear of causing distress (36% of doctors gave this response). In practice, causing distress was reported by 4.8% of the doctors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The study found an association between palliative care doctors' knowledge and attitude with procurement behaviour. Those that viewed donation positively had a greater amount of knowledge. Doctors tended to have the same professional view as their personal view. This could suggest that doctors bring their personal opinions into the work place and exhibit gate-keeping behaviour which could have implications for practice. The study also highlighted the differences between doctors' perceptions and actual experiences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al-Qurainy, R., Prentice, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Ophthalmology, Hospice, IT]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Corneal donation in palliative care: a doctor's perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>205</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/205-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breaking bad news to people with learning disabilities]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/205-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Current models for breaking bad news are inadequate in meeting the needs of people with learning disabilities (LD). People with LD are often not told of a life-limiting diagnosis. The task of breaking bad news is often left to carers who are poorly prepared and supported to cope with this.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To explore how people with LD understand and communicate about illness</p>
</li><li>
<p> To explore the experiences and preferences of people with LD, families and professionals around breaking bad news</p>
</li><li>
<p> To identify the factors that affect breaking bad news to people with LD.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>96 participants took part in nine one-to-one interviews and 13 focus groups (including 3 on-line groups) across England. Participants included people with LD (21), family carers (37), LD professionals (26), general nurses including cancer and palliative care nurse specialists (13), doctors including GPs and palliative care consultants (8).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> People with LD have wide-ranging views about whether and how they want to be told bad news</p>
</li><li>
<p> Both LD and healthcare professionals lack confidence in communicating bad news to people with LD</p>
</li><li>
<p> Many family carers want to protect people with LD from bad news</p>
</li><li>
<p> Bad news should be given in chunks, depending on the person's abilities and needs. All those around the person with LD can and should contribute to this. Most people with LD make sense of bad news within their social context, rather than in a doctor's office.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Rather than &lsquo;breaking bad news&rsquo;, the key is to help someone understand and cope with a changing situation. This is a gradual process. A new model for breaking bad news to people with LD has been produced and will be presented as a poster.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tuffrey-Wijne, I., Giatras, N., Cresswell, A., Butler, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics), Hospice, Child and adolescent psychiatry, Disability]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breaking bad news to people with learning disabilities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>205</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/205-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transdermal opioids: are we plastering over the cracks?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/205-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Transdermal opioids such as Fentanyl and Buprenorphine are recognised as effective analgesics in the treatment of moderate to severe pain in patients with both malignant and non-malignant disease. However there is evidence to suggest that the knowledge of appropriate indications, pharmacokinetics, and dose equivalencies of transdermal opioids is poor, particularly among non-specialist prescribers. This is supported by drug safety alerts from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency highlighting reports of life threatening adverse effects and even death from unintentional overdoses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To explore the prescribing patterns of transdermal opioids in palliative care patients in a UK Cancer Network.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A prospective audit was conducted over a 6 month period at 3 different sites. This incorporated palliative care patients in hospice, hospital and community settings. Data was collected following the initial specialist palliative care assessment of patients already prescribed transdermal opioids at the time of referral. Information was recorded relating to the original prescriber, documentation of indications, evidence of toxicity and use of breakthrough medication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 50 case notes were audited. Key findings revealed that indications for the use of transdermal opioids were only documented in 26% of patients. Over a quarter of patients had evidence of adverse effects, mainly opioid toxicity. The toxicity correlated with the strength of the transdermal opioid preparation rather than incorrect prescribing of breakthrough medication. However, results also showed that there appeared to be a lack of understanding as to appropriate doses of breakthrough medication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>There are clear situations in which transdermal opioids can be effective and well tolerated alternative step 3 opioids. However these audit results would suggest that there is a need for more education and training particularly among non-specialist prescribers in order to ensure the safe prescribing and administration of transdermal opioids.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whyte, G., Coackley, A., Powell, P., Clare, L., Steven, S., Thompson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000100.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000100.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Chemotherapy, Hospice, Pain (palliative care), Pain (anaesthesia), Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transdermal opioids: are we plastering over the cracks?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oral presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>205</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/206-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[{pound}30 m investment in children and young people's palliative care - taking up the challenge]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/206-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In 2007, Professor Sir Alan Craft led an independent review that identified variation in the availability of children's palliative care services and issues around their sustainability. In June 2010, Department of Health (DH) announced the availability of up to &pound;30 million is being made available to help children's hospices, networks and other providers develop local children's palliative care projects and help to address the key issues set out in the Craft report.</p>
<p>This presentation aims to set out the developments achieved by ACT, the UK children's palliative care organisation following the successful application to the DH in England for funding.</p>
<p>Over 400 projects were successful in their bids for funding. ACT's successful bids included:<l type="tab"><li><p> Extubation care pathway and parents' critical care leaflet</p>
</li><li>
<p> Symptom control manual and formulary</p>
</li><li>
<p> Children's palliative care handbook for GPs</p>
</li><li>
<p> Family Companion update and film.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>ACT has also worked in partnership with BLISS to further work on neonatal activity and with Children's Hospice UK to roll-out a programme of Square Table events to facilitate local debates about key issues in children's palliative care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McNamara, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Child health, Neonatal and paediatric intensive care, Neonatal health, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[{pound}30 m investment in children and young people's palliative care - taking up the challenge]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>206</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/206-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A care pathway to support extubation within a children's palliative care framework]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/206-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The need for this work was identified by a number of clinicians who asked ACT to develop a resource following an initial trawl for information about existing guidance and resources via the online global forum PaedPalCare.</p>
<p>This guidance on best practice for professionals in supporting families' decision making and the practical aspects of extubation, will lead to an improvement in the standards of care delivery and the choice offered to families. There is also an information leaflet for families which will help them reach an informed decision about the care they wish their child to receive.</p>
<p>The resource is appropriate for use in a variety of settings, including critical care, palliative care and community settings such as the child's home or a children's hospice. There are three sections to the resource<l type="tab"><li><p> Part One provides an introduction to children's palliative care and ACT's care pathway approach. It discusses the need for a dedicated pathway approach and outlines the principles that ACT recommends in adopting and delivering the care pathway to support extubation within a children's palliative care framework.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Part Two takes the reader through the pathway to support extubation within a children's palliative care framework. There are three stages to the pathway: the journey towards a decision to withdraw life-sustaining ventilation; the practicalities of withdrawing life-sustaining ventilation; and care at the time of death. Each stage of the pathway includes sentinel standards: key goals and useful resources to support care.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Part Three provides useful reference information, a glossary of terms and definitions and a directory of useful organisations.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>While considering the need for the pathway, it became apparent that an additional resource of an information leaflet for families was required which will help them reach an informed decision about the care they wish their child to receive.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McNamara, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Adult intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A care pathway to support extubation within a children's palliative care framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>206</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/206-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The ACT children's palliative care handbook for GPs]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/206-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>ACT recognises that as long term family practitioners, GPs are ideally placed to facilitate good communication in and between multi-disciplinary and multi-agency teams. The GP has a major role to play in children's palliative care, in understanding its complexities, and the network of service providers involved. The GP remains the constant practitioner for the family, irrespective of the outcome of the child's condition.</p>
<p>The project aimed to promote reflective practice and learning, encouraging GP's to build their knowledge and develop case studies.</p>
<p>The handbook provides a practical guide for GPs across the UK who face the challenge of working with a child requiring palliative or end of life care, and their family. It addresses the following issues:<l type="tab"><li><p> How do I communicate with children and their families?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How do I break significant news to children and their families?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How do I handle strong emotions and difficult questions?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How do I deal with ethical dilemmas in children's palliative care?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How do I assess and manage all the needs of children and their families?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How do I assess pain in children?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How do I manage physical pain in children?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How can I offer spiritual care to children and families?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How do I provide good end of life care to children and their families?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How do I manage acute, distressing terminal symptoms at the end of life?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How do I deal with the practicalities arising after the death of a child?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How do I help the family with grief and bereavement?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How do I survive and thrive in children's palliative care?</p>
</li></l></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McNamara, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pain (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The ACT children's palliative care handbook for GPs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>206</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/206-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The impact of a new end of life care occupational therapy post in a community rehabilitation team]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/206-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A newly funded EoLC occupational therapy post was recruited to in 2010 to work within a multi-professional generic adult community rehabilitation team. It was evaluated after 1 year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The post was created to support the EoLC strategy by increasing access to palliative and EoLC services for patients with both malignant and non-malignant conditions and to improve the quality of care provided. The post sits with the NHS community rehabilitation team and is supported by the hospice based community palliative care MDT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The post holder carries a specialist palliative care caseload, acts as an expert resource for colleagues, provides education, consults and helps &lsquo;skill up&rsquo; generic therapists who may have had little or no exposure working with a palliative care population.</p>
<p>Review after 1 year of new service developments, structured feedback from colleagues within the service and in partnership organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Increased understanding of the role and value of rehabilitation services in palliative and EoLC. Increase in number of palliative care patients treated by the team. Improved clinical care and patient satisfaction. Better coordination of care. Admission avoidance (on non-medical grounds). Key role enabling PPC to be achieved. Increase in advance care planning discussions and activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>There has been an increase in access to adult community rehabilitation services and also improved quality of care provided to patients with a range of life limiting diseases through new service initiatives, sharing good practice and expertise and targeted education and training for team members.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The existence of the EoLC post has demonstrably supported local and national EoLC strategy by broadening access to palliative and EoLC services. Professionals within the team have developed skills and specialist knowledge thus improving their competence and confidence. Enhanced quality of care has improved the experience of patients, their families and carers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wisbey, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Other rehabilitative therapies, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Quality improvement]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The impact of a new end of life care occupational therapy post in a community rehabilitation team]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>207</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/207-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA["Together we care" - bringing hospice and school communities together]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/207-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Public education and health promotion are vital activities in every area of healthcare. The way society views death and dying can contribute to the experiences of people receiving end of life care and their carers. However both the End of Life Care Strategy and &lsquo;Living and Dying Well&rsquo; highlight a lack of openness and discussion around death and dying. Both strategies call for national and local action to promote public awareness and challenge misconceptions.</p>
<p>Ardgowan Hospice's &lsquo;Together We Care&rsquo; schools project aims to dispel myths around and promote healthier responses towards death and dying.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims/objectives</st>
<p>The project aims to bring together two different organisations serving our local community in an innovative and purposeful way. It will raise awareness within three school communities of the role Ardgowan Hospice plays, and will help children to be less anxious about discussing and contemplating death, dying and bereavement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The project involves hospice staff:<l type="tab"><li><p> Developing innovative and purposeful relationships with our local schools</p>
</li><li>
<p> Raising awareness of the role the hospice plays</p>
</li><li>
<p> Bringing the hospice's key values to life through creative art projects</p>
</li><li>
<p> Engaging with and enabling children to freely discuss any issues surrounding death, dying and loss.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The proposed poster will present data collected through the use of workbooks and evaluation forms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Early evaluation results have shown that there is an increased awareness of the work of Ardgowan Hospice at all three schools, and that the first meeting with the classes involved was invaluable. The focus of activities to date has been on the hospice's key values.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The project has enabled excellent relationships to be established. It is hoped that this kind of innovative and creative approach will begin to change attitudes to death, dying and loss in our local community.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bunce, A., Lee, J., Milligan, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Child health, End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Health promotion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA["Together we care" - bringing hospice and school communities together]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>207</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/207-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A pilot of a pathway for individualised care of the frail elderly at the end of life]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/207-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Palliative care has traditionally focused on those with a cancer diagnosis. For the frail elderly end of life care needs are often not identified or addressed, resulting in inappropriate admissions to hospital when they are dying. This pilot demonstrated that many frail elderly people nearing the end of their lives can be identified and by documenting preferences it is possible to promote quality of life and a dignified death in a person's chosen place.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To improve End of Life Care across Barnsley and increase documentation of personal preferences for care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Care homes covered by two general practices were involved. Residents were assessed using the Gold Standards Prognostic Indicator Guidance and "The Surprise Question". Once identified preferences were recorded using the Preferred Priorities of Care Document (PPC), information was shared with Out of Hours care providers and care plans and simple pre-emptive prescribing put in place.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>43 patients were identified as potentially being in the last year of life, had a PPC and a care plan in place. During the first 6 months of this pilot, 10 of the 12 deaths which occurred were in the patients' preferred place. Anecdotally, improvement in information sharing between professionals increased confidence of care home staff and quality of care, non-elective admissions and length of hospital stay reduced.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Local ownership by and drive from the health and social care professionals involved were key to the success of this project. Pro-active recognition of frail elderly at the end of life enables planning focused around individual wants and needs. Staff, families and patients found discussions positive. Recognition of need improved quality of care for this population. Resources now need to be identified in order to roll this initiative out across the locality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hirst, B., North, C., Owen, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Stroke, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Quality improvement]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A pilot of a pathway for individualised care of the frail elderly at the end of life]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>207</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/207-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Planning and choices towards the end of life - findings from a raising public awareness campaign]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/207-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In response to the National End of Life Care Strategy, and the Dying Matters campaign, the authors ran a raising public awareness campaign from March 2010 to February 2011.</p>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Gather public views and raise awareness of end of life care while informing members of the community and providers of health and social care of the opportunities and choices available to those with life-limiting disease.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Compare knowledge of local views with national findings and use this local knowledge to help inform and underpin the locality end of life care strategy.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>A series of public events and road shows were staged, proving a very successful way to engage the public in discussion about death and dying and the importance of identifying future wishes. An End of Life care planning and choice questionnaire was used as a vehicle for this discussion. The questionnaire was also used with a range of health professionals allow some interesting comparisons.</p>
<p>A total of 304 questionnaires have been analysed.</p>
<p>Some of the initial findings include 86% of those who had completed questionnaires had talked to their family and friends, however less than 1% had discussed this with any Healthcare Professional. 60% of people hadn't made a will (53% of the professionals group).</p>
<p>The majority of people felt conversations around these issues should take place either when the person is well or diagnosed with a life-limiting illness but still well, however the majority of conversations still happen when people are very ill. Many eluded to missed opportunities for this to take place when they had had contact with health professionals.</p>
<p>Healthcare professionals should be much more pro-active in starting discussions when people are well and when they are first diagnosed.</p>
<p>The GP was often identified as the prime professional to do this.</p>
<p>Healthcare professionals responded in similar ways to the general public to most questions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quinn, S., Hickey, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Planning and choices towards the end of life - findings from a raising public awareness campaign]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>208</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/208-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using a holistic assessment tool in a multi-professional motor neuron disease clinic]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/208-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patients who are diagnosed with MND begin a journey of change which affects the individual for the rest of their life. In South West Essex a monthly clinic has been set up enabling the patient and their carers to access a wide range of health professionals. The authors use a modified personal assessment tool as a structured way to discuss concerns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Patients are asked to complete the tool in the waiting area with the assistance of their carer if needed. There are four parts of the tool: the distress thermometer (rates &lsquo;total&rsquo; distress from 0 to 10), a list of problems which can be ticked, problems are then ranked (1&ndash;4) and finally, an action plan is agreed. The tool was given to all patients attending the clinic between November 2010 and April 2011.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>20 patients attended clinic over the 6 month period. 15 assessment tools were completed. 7/15 completed the distress thermometer (DT) with an average score of 5 (range 0&ndash;9). 3 patients completed a subsequent thermometer assessment. One score decreased from 9 to 8 and the other 2 scores increased (3&ndash;7 and 3&ndash;5). Numerous unmet needs were highlighted including: Worry, fear or anxiety 4/15, anger or frustration 4/15, breathing difficulties 4/15, and mobility issues 5/15. Examples of comments included worrying about "lack of independence" and "who will look after my dog".</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>By using this tool we have allowed patients to identify unmet needs. Often the highlighted needs were not issues we would have explored previously as routine. The tool has been useful in initiating conversation around emotional issues. Another important outcome has been prompting onward referrals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The use of this tool has been successful in assessing unmet needs in a MND clinic.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wright, H., Bruni, C., Quinn, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Motor neurone disease, Neuromuscular disease, Airway biology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using a holistic assessment tool in a multi-professional motor neuron disease clinic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>208</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>208</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/208-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhanced summary care record "significant conversations" template]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/208-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This project, supported by a grant from West Midlands Workforce Deanery, is working with PCT commissioners and IT department, Primary Care, Hospice services and the regional Cancer centre to pilot an End of Life "significant conversations" template. This is available via the Summary Care Record to any acute service providing care to an EoL patient across South Birmingham; West Midlands ambulance, Primecare OOH services, PCT drop in centres and the Accident and Emergency department.</p>
<p>Patients do not want to have to give the same information over and over again and yet the Gold Standards Framework, Holistic Needs Assessment, Preferred Priorities of Care and Liverpool Care Pathway documents all cover similar ground again and again. No pilot of any nationally recommended "pathway" document, has so far seriously addressed the need for information to travel with the patient. Patient held records though trialled in some areas have the ever present problem of being forgotten or lost and so often lead to clinical staff having to duplicate their clinical entries.</p>
<p>Bury and Bolton both piloted the use of an End of Life template with one GP system using the functionality of the Summary Care Record. This pilot project takes the template a leap further by working across four GP systems (potentially covering over 95% of patients nationally). "Significant conversations" data can be collected in primary care, hospital and hospice settings. Daily automatic transfer of data back to the patients' primary care record ensures the GP is kept up to date and that the SCR record remains current for use by any service providing ongoing or acute care to patients.</p>
<p>Due to complete in November 2011. The proposed poster will outline details of the project scope, data being collected and technical solutions utilised.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plenderleith, S., Clack, S., Nightingale, T., Speakman, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhanced summary care record "significant conversations" template]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>208</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>208</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/208-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The impact of the action learning set approach in nursing homes]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/208-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Effective leadership is necessary to meet end-of-life care needs in Nursing Homes. This requires appropriate training and support.</p>
<p>An action learning set (ALS) was set up for this purpose, funded by the SHA, in partnership between a Hospice and University, facilitated jointly by Hospice CEO and University Senior Lecturer.</p>
<p>The presentation sets out:<l type="tab"><li><p> Process</p>
</li><li>
<p> Rationale for the ALS over competency-based approaches</p>
</li><li>
<p> Resulting outcomes for staff, clients and families</p>
</li><li>
<p> The significant impact of a simple framework</p>
</li><li>
<p> Sustainability issues</p>
</li><li>
<p> Insight into QIPP agenda and preferred place of care.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> 12 participants from 10 homes took part over 8 months</p>
</li><li>
<p> Participants worked on real problems and met on equal terms as a peer coaching group for goal setting, planning and reflection</p>
</li><li>
<p> Impact was evaluated by compiling changes and improvements.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Linking professional and personal attitude to mortality</p>
</li><li>
<p> More confident conversations about future planning</p>
</li><li>
<p> Greater engagement of residents and families</p>
</li><li>
<p> More consistent care planning &ndash; improved systems</p>
</li><li>
<p> Improved bereavement support</p>
</li><li>
<p> Night staff better equipped to support residents' wishes</p>
</li><li>
<p> Residents and families better heard.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> As only eight homes were finally involved, successes and difficulties provide an incomplete picture.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Good quality changes in practice have been sustainable due to culture, attitude and confidence being addressed.</p>
</li><li>
<p> It has been difficult to sustain the ALS without ongoing facilitation. Attendance issues constantly challenge.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Trust developed quickly in the ALS and proved an empowering factor.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The ALS approach provides an empowering, safe environment for setting stretch goals and achieving sustainable change. Ongoing improvement may require a longer period of facilitated support. The partnership of Hospice and University proved effective for developing trust for issue sharing and exploration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Swani, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The impact of the action learning set approach in nursing homes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>208</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>209</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/209-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Compassionate communities: from reaching people to working in partnership with communities at EoL]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/209-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Birmingham St. Mary's Hospice (BSMH) is working to increase access to excellent EoLC services to patients and their families from minority communities in Birmingham. Through this work we are aware that communities provide support to their members at end of life and during bereavement. Communities appear to take their contribution for granted as their &lsquo;way of life.&rsquo;</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Increase awareness and use of palliative care services for minority communities. Increase conversations around death, dying and bereavement. Identify and work with compassionate communities to support patients and families in the community through partnership working with clinicians. Create a forum for sharing care ideas between communities and service providers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Qualitative methods: Purposive and snowballing sampling. Education for clinicians at the hospice.</p>
</li><li>
<p> 'Sharing Care' Conference.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Compassionate communities exist in Birmingham who support their own members at end of life. They are willing to work in partnership with clinicians to support patients. A Reference group made up of community members has been set up at the Hospice. Community leaders participate in our training programme for clinicians to raise awareness of how culture and spirituality can impact on access to services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion points</st>
<p>The extent of commitment to partner communities by service providers is still to be tested. The Hospice is carrying out further work to establish whether this will support more patients to achieve their preferred place of final care.</p>
<p>Evaluation by Worcester University demonstrates communities willingness to engage with service providers and commissioners.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murungu, D., Welch, D., Swani, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Compassionate communities: from reaching people to working in partnership with communities at EoL]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>209</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/209-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The butterfly project]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/209-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A new and innovative 5 year lottery funded service which involves collaborative working and shared policies across three independent Hospices in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. It offers information, support and help to families with children and young people aged 2&ndash;18 years who are facing challenging times in coping with life limiting illness and bereavement, recognising that dealing with grief at an early age can prevent worsening emotional and mental health issues in later life. (Every Child Matters 2004).</p>
<p>In the first year we successfully ran 2 groups; 5 teenagers then 5 children and worked individually with 47 others. They were offered a choice of counselling, play therapy or a mixture of both, at school, home or Hospice and were seen one to one using adapted models of established intervention (Winston's Wish and Solution Focused Care) or within a small age appropriate group. They were encouraged to talk about their feelings through interaction, play or arts and crafts.</p>
<p>We have established training, trained volunteers and plan to train teachers to assist in setting up groups supporting bereaved young people.</p>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Initial evaluation of our teenage group identified that the young people appreciated being treated as equals, and the programme was adapted to extend the sessions following their feedback. We identified that getting children and young people together helped reduce the sense of isolation and helped them talk and learn about the grief process. The hospices have also agreed to extend bereavement support to other family members.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>A third group has just been completed and a fourth planned. We have also begun researching the needs of very young bereaved children aged 2&ndash;5 years highlighting the needs of this age group and the lack of awareness and training within nurseries. A website is to be established.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brownlee, D., Cook, A., Bunce, A., Rae, E., McEnhill, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics), Child and adolescent psychiatry]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The butterfly project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>209</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/209-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Children's hospices services in Germany - a study on the quality of support]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/209-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The first Children's Hospice in Germany was founded 1998. At present, there are 10 Children's Hospices which offer short breaks and 73 ambulant Children's Hospice services which provide support at the family's home.</p>
<p>The aim of the first main study in the field of Children's Hospice services in Germany was to find out if Children's Hospices services offer the families the support they need, and how they evaluate the quality of the offers. Another aim was the development of guidelines for "Good Children's Hospice services".</p>
<p>In a first step in the mixed methods design 10 families who use the offers of Children's Hospice services were interviewed. Based on the results of this survey, a questionnaire was developed, and answered by 172 families.</p>
<p>The findings showed that the offers of Children's Hospice services in Germany match the needs of families. 93% of the parents are &lsquo;very satisfied&rsquo; or &lsquo;satisfied&rsquo; with the support of their child or adolescent during a short break. 75% of the families are &lsquo;very satisfied&rsquo; or &lsquo;satisfied&rsquo; with the ambulant Children's Hospice service. However, there need to be made improvements in a number of areas, such as bereavement services, siblings support, cultural diversity, gender care and public relations.</p>
<p>The results of the study illustrate that the aim to offer support for the families already reaches them. The findings may help to establish Children's Hospice services in Germany and thereby help to secure its future funding. The guidelines for "Good Children's Hospice services" are currently being discussed in many Children's Hospices services. They will be evaluated in a follow-up study.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schwarzenberg, E., Jennessen, S., Bungenstock, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Children's hospices services in Germany - a study on the quality of support]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>210</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/210-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving renal and palliative care services for patients - a staff exchange programme]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/210-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Effective end of life care for patients with advanced kidney disease requires a co-ordinated and collaborative approach between renal and palliative healthcare teams. The Greater Manchester Renal /Palliative Care Action Learning Set was introduced in 2005 to address this need. An initial scoping questionnaire identified potential gaps in the provision of palliative care to patients with end stage renal disease. Key issues identified were lack of both confidence and competencies for caring for patients with end stage renal disease.</p>
<p>Hence, a renal exchange programme was developed over 12 months, including pre-placement education/information packs which also included professional development plans, evaluation forms and liability insurance (honorary contracts). One week exchanges commenced in 2007 with a structured timetable which reflected the patient pathway.</p>
<p>The hospice-hospital staff exchange programme has successfully promoted multi-professional collaborative working across boundaries -linking kidney care/acute care, primary care, and palliative care services. Staff evaluated their exchange experience positively via annual reflective multidisciplinary meetings, attended by both healthcare teams. Renal staff expressed heightened awareness of the importance placed upon spiritual and psychological care and the availability of end of life care services. Hospice staff gained a greater understanding of the complexity of living and dying withend stage renal disease, and the long term implications of renal disease on patients and their families.</p>
<p>The programme is successfully addressing Government recommendations to promote collaborative working outlined in The End of Life Care strategy (DH 2008) which highlights the need for generic nursing staff to gain knowledge and skills in palliative care. Furthermore, the now established exchange programme meets the recent recommendations from the End of Life Care in Advanced Kidney Disease which states that &lsquo;staff exchanges between kidney units and hospices should be developed to improve knowledge and skills of their respective services.&rsquo;</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heatley, S., Sigsworth, E., Braybrook, J., Robinson, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Urology, General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Urological surgery, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving renal and palliative care services for patients - a staff exchange programme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>210</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>210</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/210-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[We're living well, but dying matters]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/210-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This innovative and ground breaking DVD will help people with learning disabilities become more comfortable around talking about dying.</p>
<p>People with learning disabilities are often marginalised and excluded from conversations about their own and others' wishes around dying, death and bereavement and this can cause great pain and anger. We want to change this.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The DVD aims to:<l type="tab"><li><p> Demonstrate that people with learning disabilities can be fully involved in talking about dying, understanding choice and planning for things during their life.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Inspire other people with learning disabilities to make their choices and preferences clear about issues around dying, death and bereavement.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The DVD includes the views, ideas and hopes of people with a learning disability, and other people involved in their lives. The project team devised games and exercises focused on "Things to do before you die" and "Things you want to be remembered for".</p>
<p>Filming and editing were carried out by a community based company, and the whole team worked together to produce the final version.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>People with learning disabilities responded magnificently to this opportunity to engage in discussions and voice their own wishes. It demonstrates the huge potential for such a resource to be used by people with learning disabilities on their own, or with others as a prompt for conversations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The attempts by individuals and organisations to be "gatekeepers" and protect their clients from getting involved in this project highlighted the need for it.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This film demonstrates that people with learning disabilities can be fully involved in discussions about dying, death and bereavement. We hope it will be widely to ensure that people with learning disabilities can live well to the very end of their lives.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Austin, B., Joanna, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics), Child and adolescent psychiatry, Disability]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[We're living well, but dying matters]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>210</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>210</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/210-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of a hospice education unit in leading the development of an end of life care model of service]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/210-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Key concepts</st>
<p>This innovation has been developed and led by a palliative care education centre supported by two hospices. It illustrates how hospices can lead, innovate and influence the quality and strategic direction of end of life care (eolc) within their community. The key to this is a passion to lead and work collaboratively with multiple care settings and staff groups. The strategic engagement of the eolc commissioner has been instrumental to its success.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Achieving quality eolc across a myriad of care settings in which disparate groups of professionals work and where the culture of care is varied and inconsistent, represents an enormous challenge. In response to this challenge a new model of service has been developed to facilitate end of life care in a co-ordinated and unified way across Central and Eastern Cheshire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims and outcomes</st>
<p>The structure of this model enables sharing of best practice and innovations across professional and organisational boundaries to promote a whole systems approach. The approaches and ethos of this model are improving the experiences of patients, families and care workers with evidence that care is becoming better co-ordinated. Through this, obstacles and barriers within the patient pathway are being identified and overcome. Care sectors are encouraged to share good ideas and best practice with communication between professional groups and different organisations becoming more streamlined.</p>
<p>The model is led by two Macmillan eolc post holders and three co-leaders who work across care sectors. The team, within the model, engage directly with champion groups from a variety of care settings who are made up of different professionals caring for patients and families. They are inspired and developed by the model team to change and enhance their practice in ways that enable patients and families to live and die where they prefer with dignity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeynes, S., Challinor, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of a hospice education unit in leading the development of an end of life care model of service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>210</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>211</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/211-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trains boats and planes]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/211-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Children's Hospice Association Scotland (CHAS) is a charity that is the sole provider of children's hospice services in Scotland for children and young people with life limiting conditions. CHAS at Home was developed to support families, across Scotland, at home in times of crisis, at end of life, and to support families who live in rural and remote areas. The journey to one of CHAS's two children's hospices can become impossible due to the child or young person's condition, or the distance making the journey impractical.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>CHAS aims to offer families a choice in their place of care, no matter where they live in Scotland; including the north, the islands; Orkney, Shetland and Hebrides. Scotland is 31 510 sq miles in area, it is 274 miles long and has 130 inhabited islands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>For families who live a distance from their nearest hospice the journey can be traumatic for the child or young person especially as their condition deteriorates and their care needs increase. Imagine a 10 h journey, involving a ferry crossing, that includes administering medications, gastrostomy feeds, suctioning, personal care and more. All this can make the journey impractical and intolerable for the whole family. CHAS can relieve this by offering to take the ethos and care from the hospice to their home. A key to the success of this model of care is working in partnership with the local community teams. For the team providing this service it can mean a trip by train, boat or plane and nights away from home, however the team consider it a privilege to be able to support families in this way.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>CHAS is committed to providing a service to families wherever they live in Scotland no matter how remote. The families say "just to know that CHAS is there for us is amazing"</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henderson, B., Steven, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Gastrointestinal surgery, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trains boats and planes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>211</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>211</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/211-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Learning at your fingertips]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/211-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>CHAS is Scotland's only children's hospice organisation and has three hospice services: Rachel House in Kinross, Robin House in Balloch, and CHAS at Home which operates from both hospices and has a small base in Inverness. With 235 staff across 11 sites and 900 volunteers throughout Scotland, access to consistent high quality learning opportunities can be a challenge, regardless of role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The aim of the project was initially to meet our statutory/mandatory training needs and to develop a structured and accessible blended learning approach. One key component of this was the development of online learning modules for all statutory/mandatory areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Research was undertaken to find the best platform for CHAS to use which would be easy to create and upload module materials, and straightforward for staff and volunteers to use. It was also important for the learning to be validated through short assessments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Initially eight modules were developed and rolled out to all staff, including topics such as Fire Safety, Infection Control, Moving and Handling Objects and Display Screen Regulations. After initial apprehension staff quickly began to see the benefits and some even described the process as &lsquo;addictive&rsquo;! Staff began to see the possibilities for supporting other professional learning through on-line learning, and have prepared new modules.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The results of our work with online learning far surpassed our initial expectations. Staff are really engaged with the process both of completing modules and with many new ideas for topics. It has also encouraged greater use of electronic communication in CHAS. Currently there are 14 modules available to staff: topics as Lone Working and Bereavement have been added. We are also about to begin the process of rolling out statutory/mandatory modules to volunteers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Learning at your fingertips]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>211</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>211</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/211-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A review of translation and interpretation services provided by children's hospices in the UK, March]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/211-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The review was commissioned by the Children's Hospices UK Diversity Reference Group to take forward the work of the Diversity Toolkit (2009) that was developed in collaboration with Help the Hospices.</p>
<p>The purpose of the review was to provide data on provision of Translation and Interpretation services (T.I.S) by children's hospice services and indicate what actions are needed to improve future services. The central aim was to gather views from children's hospice staff and diverse service user families. This would influence the provision and development of existing and future services to diverse communities.</p>
<p>The findings would provide recommendations that could be adopted by Children's Hospices UK in supporting member hospices in further developing their T.I.S provision.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The review was carried out to include the provision of T.I.S services by all 44 children hospices in the UK. The review collected data by three principal means: an electronic survey questionnaire, telephone interviews and focus groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>The review identified some significant gaps in the provision of T.I.S services but also identified a great deal of good practice to incorporate into policy and guidance that can inform the development of locally appropriate provision. The findings stress the need for language and communication support provision to be an integral tool when conveying information between staff and families.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The findings describe significant barriers that deter access to services as well as compromise the quality of care and support provided to families using services. The recommendations seek to address the challenges by enabling children's hospices to review their existing policy and provision and develop a range of mechanisms that will provide localised support to a diverse range of families.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gandhi-Rhodes, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality improvement]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A review of translation and interpretation services provided by children's hospices in the UK, March]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>211</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>212</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/212-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Making volunteers count]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/212-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Many hospices owe their origins to volunteers. Volunteers' involvement today is still integral and vital to the success of the hospices they support. However the strategic importance of volunteers is often overlooked and the role of volunteers and their contribution to the cost effectiveness and sustainability of hospices is rarely considered. However if volunteers are to be fully recognised as a strategic asset we must be brave enough also to describe volunteers in business terms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Purpose of project</st>
<p>The purpose of the project is to:<l type="tab"><li><p> Determine the economic value of volunteers and return on investment</p>
</li><li>
<p> Demonstrate volunteering as a strategic asset.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Explore the use of the economic value of volunteers to influence funders.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Volunteer hours may be collected in many different ways depending on the way volunteering is structured. Hours are calculated on a monthly basis and recorded on a spreadsheet. Staff equivalent roles and hourly rates are then listed for each volunteer role. These are then multiplied by the number of volunteer hours and a percentage added for on costs. Once the total has been calculated the return on investment can be calculated.</p>
<p>One hospice's experience Volunteer value in CHAS is calculated and reported on an annual basis. In the year 2009&ndash;2010, 900 volunteers donated 83,100 h, with an economic value of &pound;1.25 m. The return on investment was 7:1. The information is disseminated in many ways and is used for many purposes, including as part of the charity's annual report.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this time of challenging and uncertain economic circumstances, measuring the value of volunteer time has many benefits to hospices and can be used in many ways. These include monitoring and demonstrating the cost effectiveness of services and influencing funders.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health policy, Health economics, Health service research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Making volunteers count]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>212</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/212-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Closed bereavement therapy group: a new way forward?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/212-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The End of Life Care Strategy recognises that care does not stop at the point of death but continues through to bereavement. A Closed Bereavement Therapy Group (CBTG) was developed by a hospice and a charity supporting people with cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims and methods</st>
<p>The aim of the project was to provide an alternative choice to traditional bereavement support by offering a therapy group that nobody else could join once the programme had started. It offered a safe sharing environment to enable people to understand and explore their grief. Bereaved carers known to the specialist palliative care team (SPCT) were invited to attend over 5 months, of the 142 people contacted, 62 responded and 27 of those expressed a wish to take part. 2 groups were set up and the carers attended for 7 sessions. Feedback was collected at the end of each session.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>It was found that a time and number limited CBTG appears to be an effective way of working with bereaved people. The fall out rate from the programme was low and the evaluations showed that it had met the groups' expectations. One of the most important aspects was their sharing of experiences, as this assisted in normalising the grief process and enabled them to develop coping strategies and increase their resilience which reduced dependency on other professionals. Using expressive arts was particularly effective in that it facilitated access to deeper emotions in an unthreatening way with requests for further sessions. This new innovative project provided an inclusive equitable service across the region for families known to the SPCT. The closed group provides a different type of environment enabling deeper therapeutic work to take place compared to traditional bereavement support groups. It is user led and cost effective and its template can be replicated and adapted to suit other services needs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sutcliffe, O., Procter, S., Holden, A., Seed, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.214</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.214</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Closed bereavement therapy group: a new way forward?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>212</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/212-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Systematic review: to what extent are end-of-life patient medical treatment preferences respected?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/212-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>End-of-life medical treatment preference tools are documents for guiding end-of-life practice and are commonly known as Advance Decisions, advance directives or living wills. To date, most published research on these tools has focused on their uptake and how they are understood by the general public and healthcare professionals. Less research has been published which examines whether such tools have been acted upon and the patient has received the level of care they requested.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Review question</st>
<p>In response to this, a systematic review was conducted which examined to what extent are the medical treatment wishes laid out in preference tools respected? Out of approximately 3500 references located, eight were included in the final systematic review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>All studies were from the USA and, as a body of evidence, indicated that the tools worked at ensuring patients' documented wishes were acted upon. These studies also demonstrated that the success of preference tools is as much about the context of care, sophistication of care models and buy-in from staff as the tool itself. Crucially, in all studies, patients' treatment wishes are recorded in an appropriate system. Implications for practice Based on the findings of the systematic review I will make suggestions for changes in the organisation of Advance Decisions in the UK and where further research is needed. Given proposed changes to the organisation of the NHS, and the increasing emphasis on patients being able to die in the place of their choice, systematic and cultural changes are needed to ensure wishes expressed in Advance Decisions can be respected whether a patient dies in hospice, at home, or in a hospital and how they are managed between settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Satherley, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Systematic review: to what extent are end-of-life patient medical treatment preferences respected?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>212</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/213-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does an inpatient hospice have a role in medical student CP1 training?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/213-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The GMC document &lsquo;Tomorrows Doctors&rsquo; recognises that End of Life care is an important skill for all doctors to learn. Evidence shows that newly qualified doctors feel unprepared to care for patients at the end of life. The Palliative Medicine Department at Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust has long been involved in CP2 training with a focus on holistic care, interdisciplinary learning and symptom management. It became part of the CP1 course in 2004. The CP1 placements aim to give a good grounding in clinical skills and team working. Reservations have been expressed about the impact on patients and the appropriateness of exposing 3rd year medical students to end of life care so early in their training.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To ascertain whether a CP1 Placement in an in-patient palliative care unit: Has a role in medical student education preparing &lsquo;Tomorrows Doctors&rsquo;</p>
<p>as a scholar/scientist, practitioner and professional. Is an appropriate environment for junior medical students. Is acceptable to our patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A questionnaire is given to each medical student on CP1 placement in Palliative Medicine during 2011 to complete at the end of their week. In addition we are giving patients who have been seen by a medical student a short questionnaire to ascertain their views on medical student interactions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In a previous departmental audit and in other research, patients have reported favourably about their experience of being involved with medical student teaching. We hope that analysis of the 2011 responses will add to the evidence that the hospice setting is an important learning opportunity for students but also a positive experience for patients. A more detailed evaluation of results will be presented.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glascott, R., Gray, M.-J., Swanwick, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.23</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.23</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Undergraduate]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does an inpatient hospice have a role in medical student CP1 training?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>213</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/213-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is a triage system of referrals to a community palliative care nurse specialist team workable?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/213-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To provide an insight into the workability of a triage system for patient referrals to a team of Community Palliative Care Clinical Nurse Specialists (CPCT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The community team were concerned about delays in responding to patients referred to their service. Patients are referred to a specialist service for specialist advice for complex symptom management / psychological support. Any delay in responding to the referral impedes the management of their symptoms or support and can lead to further distress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Triage was introduced as a 6 month pilot in an attempt to improve the response time in line with local and national initiatives. An audit was then carried out using questionnaires to district nurses, GPs, and the CPCT with the aim of providing the team with evidence of the feasibility of triage as a long term working commitment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Triage has provided the team with a workable practice which enables prompt response to both the patient and the referrer. Due to the process of triage the team has also ensured an accurate recording of the number of referrals, as well as a uniformed and structured response. Triage also allows for; The gathering of detailed information, by a CNS, on day of referral and provides an outcome for speed of response. Same day assessment and treatment of symptoms and if necessary referral to other disciplines, Education for referrers, patients and carers about symptom control, Provides patients and carers with telephone numbers straight away for them to access our service and 24 h helpline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Triage is a team initiative which has directly benefited patients and carers; opened communication with referrers; ensured we achieve local and national standards; standardised the referral process; improved data collection; provided a tool for audit.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coldicott, R., Campbell, M., Rowlands, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.24</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.24</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is a triage system of referrals to a community palliative care nurse specialist team workable?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>213</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/213-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Putting patients in control]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/213-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The Nightingale Macmillan Unit is a purpose built 20 bed specialist palliative care unit within an acute hospital. Staff identified that patients with impaired upper limb function had difficulty or were unable to summon assistance of staff on the ward. In addition, some patients who had environmental controls at home reported to feel extremely vulnerable and dependant during respite admissions, as there were no such facilities at the unit. During respite admissions we wish to maintain the patients function and condition to ensure that they can return home with the pre-existing care package and equipment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Having identified the problem, discussions were had with patients from the respite list as to what equipment they used at home, and what was most important to them. A number of different staff groups then worked together to obtain a range of non-standard nurse call switches and an environmental control system to facilitate control of electrical appliances.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients with impaired upper limb function can now use the nurse call system to summon assistance when they need it. Patients now also have control over lighting, TV, radio and a fan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>These improvements have enabled patients with impaired upper limb function to feel more empowered during their respite admissions. The non-standard nurse call switches have allowed patients to summon assistance when they need it. Therefore patient's privacy and dignity are greater and demands on nursing staff time are reduced. "When I wake up in the night, I can now turn on the light instead of being stuck in the dark" Gordon (patient). It has been both a positive and rewarding experience for staff to be able to use technology to promote patient independence and quality of life.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dickinson, C., Tydeman, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.25</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.25</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Human rights]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Putting patients in control]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>213</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/213-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of national audit tools for hospice community services]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/213-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The remit of the National Audit Tools Group (NATG) is to produce a set of core audit tools to enable hospices to evidence compliance with national standards of care, irrespective of their processes or documentation systems. Quality impact analysis, feedback from workshops, training days and consultation with hospices identified a need for audit tools specific to community services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Development of a comprehensive family of audit tools to measure quality of hospice care in the community against validated standards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A NATG subgroup was formed drawing on expertise from different community areas, in particular Community Nurse Specialist and Hospice at Home. To inform the development and structure of the tools, it critically reviewed: statutory and regulatory requirements, relevant national standards and guidelines, range and scope of community services provided by hospices. Because of the size and complexity of the project, topics were grouped to reflect different community areas, each requiring specialist input and ensuring multi professional collaboration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five audit tools under development are: Referral Management, Initial Assessment, Follow-up Assessment, Assessment Domains, Cooperation with Other Providers. Further tools are planned to include: Advance Care Planning, Communication, Confidentiality, Education and Training, Rapid Response, Documentation and Recording.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The diversity of community service provision and the different work patterns across hospices presented a number of challenges in ensuring that the tools under development are fit for purpose and meet local needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Following testing and critical review, the first tool will be available by the end of 2011 and will be published on Help the Hospices website as a free download. Other tools will follow during 2012.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Newton, C., Fisher, S., Flanagan, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.26</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.26</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Confidentiality, Legal and forensic medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of national audit tools for hospice community services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>214</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/214-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[End of life care for people with dementia: the challenge for specialist palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/214-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>There are 613 661 people with dementia in England, rising to over a million by 2030, an increase of 72%. They should have the same access to palliative care as others but many are not receiving it. Specialist palliative care (SPC) should consider how it can help to achieve a &lsquo;good death&rsquo; for them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To examine the end of life care needs of people with dementia; to identify gaps in the provision of care and to develop a hospice strategy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A literature search identified issues in the care of people dying with dementia. Consultation with providers of care confirmed these findings. A focus group of bereaved carers provided insight into the experience of caring for someone dying of dementia. Models of care from other hospices were explored to generate ideas. Hospice teams were encouraged to share experience of caring for these patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Emerging issues were the risks associated with hospital admission; symptom burden; the emotional impact of decision making on families and uncertainty about the role of SPC. Effective communication; advance care planning; symptom assessment; recognition of dying and support for families were identified as essential for improving care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>A hospice strategy was developed, based on different levels of SPC. Most people with dementia need generalist palliative care, with SPC providing education and consultancy for professional carers. A practice development role with partnership working between the hospice and care providers is being explored. The hospice should also create a dementia friendly environment for people requiring its services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The increasing incidence of dementia and the inadequacy of palliative care provision challenges SPC to find innovative approaches to improve the experience of dying. This project makes a start in meeting the challenge.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alsop, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.27</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.27</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Memory disorders (psychiatry), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[End of life care for people with dementia: the challenge for specialist palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>214</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>214</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/214-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[South west region clinical incidents benchmarking project]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/214-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Hospice Nurse Managers in the South West have worked collaboratively to develop a tool to monitor clinical incidents within hospice Inpatient units. This tool forms the basis of a quarterly benchmarking exercise. The tool currently in use is based on the national nursing metrics system and consists of an excel spreadsheet detailing numbers of clinical incidents against 1000 bed days including falls, pressure ulcers and medical incidents (Drug errors). Each hospice Nurse manager has an electronic copy of the tool and is responsible for submitting quarterly returns to Dorothy House Hospice Care. The results are then collated and a regional average is produced. Results are shared at SW regional Nurse Manager meetings and possible reasons for variation discussed and good practice examples highlighted. Each hospice has the option to share their individual results and the regional average with their local commissioners or other interested parties.</p>
<p>Challenges in setting up the benchmarking system have included ensuring consistency in reporting and the variation in database systems currently in use for data collection/analysis.</p>
<p>Benefits have included the opportunity to benchmark against other hospices rather than acute or community providers, the routine of regular discussion with colleagues on how improvements may be made to reduce incidents and demonstration to the Care Quality Commission of a proactive approach to managing clinical incidents.</p>
<p>South West Region Forum for Hospice Nurse Managers. March 2011.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stevens, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.28</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.28</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Nursing, Hospice, Dermatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[South west region clinical incidents benchmarking project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>214</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>214</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/214-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[South west region infection prevention and control network]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/214-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Hospice Nurse Managers in the South West have worked collaboratively to develop a SW regional hospice network for Infection Prevention and Control. Initially it was agreed to host a launch event at Dorothy House Hospice to look at the changes in infection prevention and control at national level and how this might impact on hospices. Additionally there was open discussion on how a regional network for infection prevention and control might function and draft terms of reference were prepared. At the second meeting the terms of reference were agreed in addition to a range of topics that might be included at regional meetings, a list of suitable dates and ownership by hospices for hosting meetings. Challenges have included how this network might link to local PCT or Health Protection Agency initiatives/events, the varying levels of infection prevention and control already operating within hospices and meeting national requirements as small organisations. Benefits so far have included the opportunity to work collaboratively with other hospices on infection prevention and control issues, learning from each other and sharing experience and good practice. South West Region Forum for Hospice Nurse Managers. March 2011.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stevens, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[South west region infection prevention and control network]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>214</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>214</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/215-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The provision of public education - a hospice's journey]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/215-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The End of Life Care Strategy highlighted the importance of public education and the Dying Matters coalition was created to encourage people to talk about dying. This describes the experience of one hospice in taking forward this initiative, explaining the approaches used and identifying some of the achievements and challenges faced. One of the aims of the current hospice strategy was for the hospice to develop a role in public education. A core group of enthusiastic staff including health and social care practitioners, educationalists and fundraisers met to explore how we could begin to address this aspect of the strategy. The underpinning philosophy of our approach was to work in partnership with our community, but how to get started was the first challenge. In 2009 an initial event was held by the group in a local market town on a Saturday morning. However, just four people attended. The group met, reflected upon the approach adopted and the lessons learnt. An opportunity arose to attend an open day at a local crematorium and this proved much more successful with greater levels of interest from the over 500 people who attended. This led to a change in strategy through attending local events organised by other organisations and having a &lsquo;stall&rsquo; manned by staff, as well as responding to invitations from individuals/groups, such as a local General Practice patient participation group. This has achieved greater success with people asking questions about how to approach a discussion about dying with a family member or friend and also it is breaking down perceptions of the hospice. The group has also encouraged hospice volunteers to support this initiative and they have been interested and enthusiastic. The journey has had highs and lows and the challenge is to keep momentum going.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Renzie-Brett, H., Alsop, A., Whitfield, S., De Leeuw, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The provision of public education - a hospice's journey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>215</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>215</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/215-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Innovation in nursing practice: developing a nurse led community unit]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/215-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In 2010 the Douglas Macmillan Hospice was successful in receiving a government grant to build an eco-friendly environment which houses three separate independent living units. We were keen to develop on the fundamental aspect of total holistic care, which, for many palliative care patients means good nursing care.</p>
<p>The aspiration was to move away from the traditional model of care, to a model which delivers choice to the patient, offering a quality service which develops methods of reaching out to patients with a more rapid access, in line with the End of Life Strategy.</p>
<p>The aim was to provide an alternative place of care for a variety of patients. We sought to provide excellent end of life care, if it was the patients' choice not to die at home, respite for carers, transitional care for young adults and also excellent rehabilitation to encourage independent living as a step down from the in-patient unit.</p>
<p>The innovation was driven on several aspects; we wanted the unit to be nurse-led. We were able to utilise the community palliative care team who were already qualified as independent nurse prescribers, to manage any symptom issues and undertake clinical nursing tasks. The Healthcare Support workers would expand their role through education and training to support the patients to self medicate and to be a second checker for controlled drug administration. Our team of volunteer's would undergo training and education to support the Healthcare Support workers to provide basic personal care.</p>
<p>The units are due to open in April 2011. We hope to offer quality individualised care for patients and their family which will meet a local need and be a unique service promoting the hospice philosophy. We plan to evaluate through capturing user views and clinical audit.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirkland, G., Ekin, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Nursing, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Innovation in nursing practice: developing a nurse led community unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>215</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>215</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/215-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Managing fluctuations in legacy income]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/215-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Recognising the unpredictability of legacy income, and as a result of a risk assessment of the hospice's financial structure and framework, the Trustees and Chief Executive of the hospice introduced a Designated Reserve - the Legacy Equalisation Fund.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>The aim of this Fund is to enable the hospice to dampen the effect of annual fluctuations in the flow of legacy income and forms part of the hospice reserves. The Fund is used at the discretion of the Trustees for revenue or capital expenditure in future years when a shortfall in income from other sources occurs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The annual budget for legacy income is calculated on the basis of the average received in the previous 5 years. Management accounts and reporting reflect this figure while the Financial Accounts, in line with SORP, reflect the actual amount receivable in the SOFA. A Balance Sheet transfer between Funds reflects the surplus/deficit legacy monies receivable compared to budget.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The level of legacies received over the last 5 years has enabled the Hospice to budget and plan with confidence in the knowledge that there are adequate reserve resources available to cover any shortfall in other sources of income.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>During an unprecedented period of economic turbulence, the hospice has continued to manage its finances with a view to long term viability, while retaining the flexibility to take advantage of opportunities for new service development which meets its core objectives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The value of having the Legacy Equalisation Fund is particularly apparent in current financial circumstances as it will allow the hospice to continue to support capital and revenue service development projects in a period when traditional sources of finance may not be available due to likely cuts in government expenditure and the general economic climate.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Managing fluctuations in legacy income]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>215</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>215</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/215-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring clinical outcomes for hospices]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/215-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In 2009 the West Midlands hospice group worked with Help the Hospices to establish a set of measures that would demonstrate the value of the work of hospices to healthcare commissioners.</p>
<p>An important domain of this work was to accurately measure the outcomes of the care that hospices give through the eyes of those receiving the service &ndash; patients and carers. It was felt that the only true measure of a satisfactory outcome is in the eyes of the service receiver so we used that basis to devise an accurate measure of the outcomes of hospice work. We decided to do this by asking patients and carers what they thought the hospice had achieved using a methodology which could be statistically validated.</p>
<p>The DMH worked with other hospices to formulate questions which would most accurately reflect the user's views on the outcomes of hospice treatments as against their goals and expectations. The work was then used to run a series of pilot surveys which helped to test the validity of the questions used and the methodology for calculation of the outcome results and scores. The result was a complete suite of surveys carefully designed to accurately measure service outcomes in hospice care. After some further testing and amendment the surveys were launched in autumn 2010.</p>
<p>These outcome measures are calculated from the results of the surveys and cover both patients and carers for the following services:<l type="tab"><li><p> In Patient Unit</p>
</li><li>
<p> Day Hospice</p>
</li><li>
<p> Community Clinical Nurse Specialist service</p>
</li><li>
<p> Hospice at Home</p>
</li><li>
<p> Bereavement Services.</p>
</li></l></p>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>of the first full surveys are now available and there are plans to benchmark with other hospices in future. This will enable us to use the results to continue to work towards improving the quality of the services we deliver.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberts, M., Stott, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring clinical outcomes for hospices]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>215</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>216</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/216-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does respite care address the needs of palliative care service users and carers? An exploration of their perspectives and experience of respite care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/216-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>There are clear indications that over the coming years, an increasing amount of support for carers of patients with palliative care needs will be required. In recent UK policy and guidance respite care is frequently mentioned as a key factor in supporting carers. However, little is known about respite care services for people with palliative care needs and their carers and services appear to have developed on the assumption that they are a "good thing". This study addresses this gap in knowledge. It is located in a professional doctorate study where parallel application in practice is encouraged.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To explore the perspectives and experience of palliative care service users and carers of respite care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The participants were hospice service users and carers who had experienced respite care in that hospice and other settings. The approach was qualitative and data collection was carried out by unstructured informal interview and analysed in accordance with Grounded Theory strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Analysis of the data showed that there is nothing straightforward about respite care and the concepts of need and acceptance, vulnerability and resilience, risk and enablement, loss and gain all emerged.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This study confirmed that respite care suffers from a problem with definition and is often talked about in a trite way which doesn't reflect the complexity of the caring relationship it is supposed to be sustaining.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Respite care is valued by palliative care service users and carers. The articulation of respite care needs and the insights gained in this study have the potential to influence practice and provide a platform for service development and improvement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolkowski, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does respite care address the needs of palliative care service users and carers? An exploration of their perspectives and experience of respite care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>216</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/216-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Productive ward at Earl Mountbatten Hospice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/216-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The Productive Ward is a National Initiative developed by the NHS Institute of Innovation &amp; Improvement (NHS). Promoting proactive change that concentrates on innovation in practice and on staff having the control to make changes, as stated by the Boshoff (2005). It is different to reactive change, which comes about as a result of needing to modify practice.</p>
<p>The Hospice was invited to be part of the Productive Ward project in order for us to review our systems and processes and enable us to save time that could be used to deliver direct patient care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To complete the three foundation modules, followed by eight process modules.</p>
<p>Photographs were taken prior to the de-cluttering/re-organisation on the ward. This resulted in time saving as all the equipment for a procedure is kept in the same place, that is, catheterisation &ndash; the dressing pack, catheter, catheter bag, stand etc are now located in the same place.</p>
<p>Knowing how you are doing &ndash; this provides monthly outcome measures for key performance indicators.</p>
<p>Meal Wastage Action was taken to reduce meal wastage which resulted in significant cost savings.</p>
<p>Stock/Finance Stock is now kept to a minimum, that is, dressings, drug, etc, making it easier to ascertain exactly how much stock the ward is holding, this has also resulted in a tidier store room.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Hand overs</st>
<p>Morning handovers were held in the staff room taking up to an hour. The change introduced (with a huge amount of resistance) was to hold the handover in the nurses' office to ensure visibility and swiftness. The intention from my perspective was to speed up and reduce the time/cost of this handover. The handover now takes approx. 15 min.</p>
<p>Overall, the Productive Ward initiative has proved successful with positive outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plummer, B., Parkes, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Productive ward at Earl Mountbatten Hospice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>216</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/216-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing an electronic records system, SystmOne, to meet the needs of children's hospice services]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/216-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>With the challenges set by the Department of Health National Strategic Programme, in 2009 Children's Hospice Services in the East of England started an ongoing major strategic development; the implementation of an electronic care records management system, SystmOne. The system is designed to improve management information to inform the development of services, improve sharing of information and enhance the quality and consistency of records.</p>
<p>The project has required a long term commitment by the organisation to ensure the system is developed effectively to meet the organisations' needs. During the last year, the main aim of the project has been focused on the development of care and support assessment tools and care plans.</p>
<p>An innovative approach to the development of the assessment tools and care plans has involved:<l type="tab"><li><p> Collaborative working with external experts</p>
</li><li>
<p> Recruitment of a SystmOne Manager</p>
</li><li>
<p> Use of expert knowledge of key care and support professionals</p>
</li><li>
<p> Engagement of all staff</p>
</li><li>
<p> Involvement of Family Forums</p>
</li><li>
<p> Appointment of Champions.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The initial trials of the assessment tools and care plans proved instrumental in their successful implementation across the three hospice localities. However, there were some initial challenges to overcome including the:<l type="tab"><li><p> Resistance to change resulting in the lack of recognition by some staff and managers of the need for electronic care records</p>
</li><li>
<p> Managing momentum and the lack of some staff and managers' commitment to dedicate time for using SystmOne.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The development of assessment tools and care plans will enable the creation of shared clinical care records with other healthcare providers, who are also users of SystmOne improving functioning and co-ordination between agencies. The sharing of records will enhance interagency working and communication, immediate availability of information, timely communications about changes to care and care needs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leese, C., Rennie, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Child health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing an electronic records system, SystmOne, to meet the needs of children's hospice services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>217</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/217-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Putting the child and family first: developing a clinical network for children's palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/217-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>National reviews have identified the need to provide 24/7 access to clinical expertise especially around the time of end-of-life. In the East of England locally commissioned reviews have recommended improvement in collaboration and joined-up clinical working between voluntary and statutory sectors.</p>
<p>This presentation describes a DH &pound;30 million Children's Palliative Care Fund project to develop a managed clinical network of services throughout the East of England and reports how challenges created by cross boundary working can be overcome.</p>
<p>A series of externally facilitated workshops, one for nursing leaders and one for medical leaders followed by a joint workshop aimed to develop solutions in an environment where there is little new funding, little recognition of the complexity of children's palliative care, and in a region where there is no specialist in paediatric palliative medicine.</p>
<p>Hurdles identified in the workshops were:<l type="tab"><li><p> Ineffective communication processes and information sharing</p>
</li><li>
<p> Acceptability to families of distant advice</p>
</li><li>
<p> Professional preciousness and boundaries</p>
</li><li>
<p> Conflicting priorities</p>
</li><li>
<p> Achieving critical mass of clinicians for a 24/7 rota</p>
</li><li>
<p> Commercial sensitivity &ndash; competition among providers</p>
</li><li>
<p> Organisational and clinical governance arrangements</p>
</li><li>
<p> Contractual framework and financial commissioning.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Children's Palliative Care is a low volume specialty, and so is best developed by network working across a larger geographical area, utilising the skills of Paediatricians with special expertise, Children's Community Nursing Teams and Children's Hospice Nurses both in their respective local areas but also across a wider geographical patch. Hospice Services, with their cross boundary catchment area, and relationships with NHS Commissioners, are well placed to facilitate such developments.</p>
<p>Further thought needs to be given to the balance needed between specialist services (nurse consultants and medical consultants in paediatric palliative medicine) and the more local services, and how the latter can contribute to provision of a specialist service.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maynard, L., Rennie, T., David, V. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Putting the child and family first: developing a clinical network for children's palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>217</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>217</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/217-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing a carers group]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/217-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>It was identified that there was a need to support carers within a multidisciplinary environment. The group enabled carers to meet and share experiences.</p>
<p>It is important to care for the carers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To provide a structured programme for carers.</p>
</li><li>
<p> To impart knowledge and information to carers on a variety of topics.</p>
</li><li>
<p> To have a holistic approach to providing support for carers, and to incorporate all members of palliative care team to contribute to the programme.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Evaluated existing service for carers.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Visited carers group in another locality.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Informally interviewed carers at Day Hospice re: need and content of the programme.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Developed a 12 session programme over 6 weeks, meeting weekly at the Hospice.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Pilot included Day Hospice patient carers, and then expanded to open referral system.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Evaluated each session and then the entire programme.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Feedback from evaluation shows carers felt supported, gained motivation and benefitted from useful information.</p>
<p>From pilot session:-<l type="tab"><li><p> 10 sessions scored 100% very satisfied</p>
</li><li>
<p> 1 session scored 20% least useful, 20% most useful, 60% very satisfied.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>From 2 sessions:-<l type="tab"><li><p> 67% were women</p>
</li><li>
<p> 33% were men.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Informal comments were positive. several would like an avenue to continue to meet after group has finished.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Results show that the need to support and provide information to carers was met</p>
</li><li>
<p> At the end of the programme carers reported they felt more supported and better informed</p>
</li><li>
<p> Established peer support continues with some carers</p>
</li><li>
<p> Feedback showed that it would be more beneficial to have longer sessions over an 8 week period</p>
</li><li>
<p> Referrals avenue to be extended to other teams and programme to be more widely publicised.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>With user involvement we have developed a support service to carers with a focus and structure. This supports and enables carers to care for themselves while caring for others.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haskins, D., Chaddock, B., Ashton, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing a carers group]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>217</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>217</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/217-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Commissioning end of life services using care profiles]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/217-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Department of Health (DH) required local reviews of End of Life (EoL) services in England ahead of the publication of its National EoL Strategy in 2008. Related cross-sector work undertaken by Liverpool Primary Care Trust (PCT) stressed the need for a means of specifically commissioning EoL services.</p>
<p>It was proposed that care profiles could enable service requirements to be set in respect of skill mix, delivery, quality and outcomes for each stage of the EoL pathway. The DH had used care profiles for a variety of services in the 1990s. Therefore, during 2010, Liverpool PCT undertook a project to establish whether the methodology could be used to commission EoL services (other than those delivered to inpatients in hospitals) by adapting the original structure and tailoring it for commissioning purposes.</p>
<p>An iterative approach was applied through a series of four workshops, based on action learning events, which sought consensus among participants from across a full cross-section of commissioning, provider and service user interests. The outputs were evaluated by an external reference group.</p>
<p>The project was a success. Its recommendations were subsequently used to commission EoL services across Liverpool. One conclusion was that the basic service requirements for EoL care are the same irrespective of the related disease. Care profiles are simple and flexible, and they complement and augment integrated care pathways. By requiring the recording of outcomes throughout the care process, they aid quality and audit processes. They offer the potential to cost EoL services, and should be transferable to other conditions.</p>
<p>Care profiles can support GP commissioning by providing clinically relevant and detailed information to specify services.</p>
<p>Subsequent work established how the EoL care profiles can support advanced care planning, by assuring the range, quality and consistency of information given to patients and carers, with any potential choices highlighted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gandy, R., Roe, B., Rogers, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.39</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.39</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Commissioning end of life services using care profiles]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>217</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>218</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/218-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Grief and bereavement - supporting siblings of a children's hospice service]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/218-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Children and young people's palliative care is an increasingly recognised specialty for life limiting and life threatening conditions. These children often have a difficult life filled with hospital appointments and strange professionals invading their homes. The siblings of these children may often be forgotten about or neglected, as the focus is on the sick child. The siblings have their own grief and bereavement and very often need support in getting through this.</p>
<p>Our children's hospice at home service offers pre and post bereavement support to the whole family, but recognised that more could be done to meet the specific needs of siblings.</p>
<p>There was a review of the caseload to identify possible siblings ranging in age from 5 to 19 years. Family's views were sought, and discussion was had at the multidisciplinary team meetings to identify appropriate participants. Following a successful bid to the Department of Health children's palliative care funding, two separate age-appropriate support events for siblings were organised. The older children (11 &ndash; 19) did not take up the opportunity for a place, so only one event was held for the younger age group. The day was structured and therapeutic group work formed the basis for the sessions, led by specialist children's palliative care nurses, the play therapist and support staff.</p>
<p>It was recognised that the older children regularly attend a youth group which offers them ongoing support. The day was very well evaluated by the children attending, and subsequently their parents. More sibling events will be organised for the future, as the day proved to be an effective way of meeting their needs. Due to the success of the day, there is also a plan to open up future days to the children of our adult palliative care service, who have some similar needs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dempster, T., Cooper, L., Petty, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.40</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.40</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Child abuse, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Grief and bereavement - supporting siblings of a children's hospice service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>218</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>218</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/218-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nurse-led palliative care clinic: optimising choice for patients]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/218-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Clinics at the hospice have been largely medically-led with patients attending on an ad-hoc basis with eligibility restricted to existing patients. This project aimed to set up weekly nurse-led clinics with access to all patients; thus allowing patients to access our service at an earlier stage and enabling a more seamless transition to our Specialist Homecare Team when their condition deteriorates.</p>
<p>The clinic was established by an Advanced Nurse Practitioner with appropriate training using Hatchett's (2008) guidelines and aimed to offer a less threatening option to access palliative care in a clinic environment instead of a home visit. The clinic sees patients at initial referral and for ongoing support and fulfils both the DH (2010) suggestion to offer more choice to patients and widen intake to non-cancer patients as well as advancing nursing practice.</p>
<p>Evaluation was facilitated using a questionnaire completed by patients attending. Data was evaluated and comments collated in themes for analysis by the researcher.</p>
<p>This clinic was evaluated highly by patients with 100% saying appointment length was appropriate and 67% stating that their symptoms were fully assessed. 100% of attendees felt satisfied about being seen by a nurse rather than another healthcare professional.</p>
<p>After 1 year referrals for assessment have steadily increased with one fifth from outside agencies. Presently the service has a caseload of clinic-only patients which is a step towards increasing choice and shows greater access to existing hospice services.</p>
<p>The findings confirm that the clinic is an effective use of time and skills and is well received by patients. It offers another dimension of service for patients and this data reinforces the need to extend and develop this service.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cowan, M.-M., Cardy, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.41</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.41</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Nursing, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nurse-led palliative care clinic: optimising choice for patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>218</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>218</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/218-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prioritising care in a community palliative care setting using a dependency scoring tool]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/218-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>With increasing referral rates to the Specialist Palliative Care community team, it became necessary to analyse the dependency of the caseload. A review showed a lack of available tools that had been used successfully, so an in-house solution was sought to develop one.</p>
<p>The starting point was to utilise the experience and instincts of the Nurse Specialists to place the patients on their caseload into four different categories:- Red, Amber, Green and Blue, depending on perceived urgency and complexity of needs (with Red being the highest and Blue the lowest).</p>
<p>10 patients from each of the four categories were randomly picked and scored using the modified Support Team Assessment Tool. This identified a lower symptom score for patients assigned to the Blue and Green categories compared to those in Red and Amber.</p>
<p>Of the10 Red category patients, 7 died and 3 required admission to the Hospice for symptom control within a 2 week period. This contrasted with the patients in the other categories, who remained well controlled at home.</p>
<p>Analysing the scores, pain could be considered the most important indicator. The exercise showed that Nurse Specialists were able to accurately determine patients' dependency.</p>
<p>This has influenced the way the team manages their caseload. All patients are now categorised and home visits are carried out by the most appropriate team member, using the different skill mix of roles. Red and Amber patients are assessed by the Nurse Specialist, whereas patients in the Green and Blue category may be assessed by a Staff Nurse, reporting back to the Nurse Specialist who maintains overall responsibility.</p>
<p>This ensures that each patient on the caseload has regular contact, and is seen by the most appropriate professional at the appropriate time. Patient evaluation is currently underway, but informal feedback from patients and families has been positive.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dark, D., Cardy, C., Green, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.42</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.42</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prioritising care in a community palliative care setting using a dependency scoring tool]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>218</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>219</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/219-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Supporting the whole family: caring for children when a parent is dying]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/219-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>With an increasing number of younger adults with a young family being referred to our adult hospice service, there was a noticeable gap in the provision of appropriate support for these children. As a provider of palliative care services for both adults and children, there were opportunities to offer holistic, integrated care designed to meet the individual needs of all our patients.</p>
<p>The staffing includes a Play Therapist and a team of Nursery Nurses who had predominantly worked within the children's service in the home setting. However, their skills and expertise were accessible to the whole service, including children of adult patients. A programme was introduced to promote awareness among the adult teams of utilising these staff further. In the first 6 months, the Play Therapist has provided specialist interventions with 14 children of adult patients (not including bereavement support). The Nursery Nurses have so far delivered childcare support with 7 children of 4 patients. These childcare sessions have proved invaluable to the families receiving them; for example, helping at home when the patient has been feeling ill after chemotherapy, or looking after the children to allow other relatives to visit the patient in the Hospice Inpatient Unit. They have also developed therapeutic relationships with the children and enabled a sense of normality and routine at a time when there is a great deal of disruption, including trips out or assistance in accessing regular clubs or groups.</p>
<p>Specialist palliative care has always encompassed support for the whole family, not just the patient. The additional support for children has proved beneficial to the families cared for, and the evaluations so far have been extremely positive. There are plans to develop and extend this service in order to meet the holistic needs of this group of adult patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cardy, C., Dempster, T., Petty, G., Cowan, M.-M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.43</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.43</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Supporting the whole family: caring for children when a parent is dying]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>219</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/219-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Taboo or not taboo: a collaborative hospice/theatre/schools project]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/219-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>During their school years, an estimated 22 000 children and young people will lose a parent. Many others will experience the death of close relatives or friends, yet schools and society struggle to know how to support them because talking about death is &lsquo;taboo&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The purpose of this exciting project is to enable students and their teachers to talk openly about dying in a way that dispels some of the euphemisms, myths and fear associated with death and bereavement and to promote the recognition of death as a natural part of living.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Preparation</st>
<p>The theatre company has agreed to create, write and perform a multimedia drama using video and live performance as an integral part of a half-day interactive workshop for schools on death and bereavement. It is aimed at Key Stage 4 students, and in addition to relevant lesson plans, schools will be supplied with information packs for teachers, students and parents. Schools will be required to have some counselling support available for students.</p>
<p>The hospice undertook the original groundwork for the project and continues to be closely involved as advisor on the content of the drama, and with the schools liaison work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Current progress</st>
<p>A light-hearted sketch has been created which uses humour to address this serious issue; it will be performed by about eight young student actors. The first six schools who expressed an interest in the project have been selected to take part in the initial phase. Funds for the project will be raised by schools.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ongoing plans</st>
<p>The project includes plans to record the theatre piece on DVD for use in other schools and general release to a national body such as Help the Hospices.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Withell, B., Irvine, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Taboo or not taboo: a collaborative hospice/theatre/schools project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>219</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/219-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Outcome of referrals to a community specialist palliative care service, where do patients die?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/219-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The majority of people would prefer to die at home, yet more than 50% of the UK population die in hospital. NHS policy and specialist palliative care services encourage the individual to choose and expect to experience end-of-life care in their preferred place. Commissioners for specialist services use place of death as a quality marker against funding provided.</p>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A proforma was completed upon the death of every patient referred to the service in 2009&ndash;10. Information captured included preferred and actual place of death, aspects surrounding end-of-life care including any triggers for admission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>788 patients known to the hospice died, the median number of days patients were known was 83 and mean 160.</p>
<p>7% of deaths were from non-malignant disease.</p>
<p>55% of patients specified their preferred place of death was their current place of living (home, residential or nursing home and prison). 67% of patients who expressed this preference achieved this. 14% of patients identified they would prefer to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospice for end-of-life care, 81% achieved this. New conditions and lack of social support were significant triggers for admission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The proportion of patients achieving their preferences for home and inpatient hospice with this community service compares favourably with results reported. Achieving preferences is a reflection of healthy community services as a whole. Despite the more unpredictable time course of non-malignant illnesses, the majority of these patients were able to achieve their preferences for end-of-life care.</p>
<p>This audit provided basic information for discussion with our commissioners. Breakdown by primary care team and cause of admission enabled the service to consider targets for future education and activity by looking at triggers for acute admissions as starting points to change health behaviour and target social care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Capel, M., Vout, L., Gazi, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Prison medicine, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Outcome of referrals to a community specialist palliative care service, where do patients die?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>220</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/220-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Establishing an integrated and coordinated end of life care service - working in partnership]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/220-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Greenwich Care Partnership was established in November 2010 to develop and provide an integrated end of life care service for the residents of the London Borough of Greenwich. The service is provided by one NHS organisation and two charitable organisations working together to provide a seamless, responsive service for dying people at home. The service has initially been commissioned on a "test and learn" basis, to establish the potential risks, benefits and potential cost savings of providing such a comprehensive service based in the home.</p>
<p>The service aims to:<l type="tab"><li><p> Provide planned and urgent care around the clock to people at the end of life</p>
</li><li>
<p> Reduce admissions and length of stay for people who do not need or wish to be cared for in hospital</p>
</li><li>
<p> Improve the quality of care provided, reducing duplication and the time that clinical staff spend on administrative tasks</p>
</li><li>
<p> Provide support for the key worker and improve inter-professional communication 24 h a day</p>
</li><li>
<p> Reduce unnecessary expenditure and allow investment in services which enhance patient experience and promote choice, dignity and control at the end of life</p>
</li><li>
<p> Support informal carers before and after bereavement.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Data will be presented as monitored against Key performance indicators of the project, this will demonstrate achievement of the aims, although the project remains in development on date of submission. Additionally, the presenter will reflect on the highs and lows of partnership working and make recommendations for others embarking on a similar venture.</p>
<p>This presentation will provide information which will be of use to any organisation considering embarking on a partnership venture; this approach is likely to be much more common in the current political climate. As we try to increase quality and capacity for care at home, this service delivery model will be of increased interest.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heaps, K., Jones, P., Rattigan, C., Howsam, A., Stokes, J., Williams, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Quality improvement]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Establishing an integrated and coordinated end of life care service - working in partnership]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>220</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>220</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/220-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing a clinical skills competency framework]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/220-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In this unique care environment, palliative and respite care is provided for young adults with a diverse range of life limiting conditions, who have complex and multiple care needs. Thus, the demands on healthcare assistants, with regard to the range and level of skill required to care for these patients, is equally diverse. In light of recent commentary on the debate surrounding the registration and regulation of healthcare assistants, the organisation began to consider how best to prepare for these likely changes. It was concluded that robust assessment and maintenance of competence would be essential. A review of competency based training packages currently available was undertaken. However, due to the diverse skills practised by healthcare assistants in this environment, these packages were not suitable to meet the training needs identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Inspired by competency based training packages available locally, a clinical skills competency framework was devised as a practice based learning and assessment process. The clinical skills competency framework was developed as a single document that would serve as a record of competence and training for the organisation and the individual, a template for assessment of competence and also form the basis of a professional portfolio of clinical skills for the healthcare assistant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A focus group was formed in order to compile a standardised skill list for healthcare assistants within the organisation. Competencies were compiled, alongside evidence based training packages, by registered nurses with particular skill, experience or interest in the relevant area of care, thus acting as a development exercise for the nurses as well.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The collation and implementation of this training package has been the catalyst for a cultural shift within the organisation, towards integration of practice focused teaching and assessing into all aspects of clinical work.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ebeling, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Adolescent health, Child health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing a clinical skills competency framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>220</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>220</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/220-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Care team volunteers]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/220-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>As a hospice for children and young adults we wanted to find creative, cost effective ways to enrich patient lives, using volunteers as befrienders to promote normalisation which research shows is a priority for this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>We aimed to recruit befriending volunteers with a developed skills set, to ensure flexibility and enhance patient experience. We aimed to set up systems to recruit, train, support, and enable volunteers to work safely.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews with patients and staff revealed a demand for volunteers in a befriending role. The appointment of a Care Team member to act as a link between the care team and volunteers was essential as previous attempts to introduce volunteers to care areas were unsuccessful. Volunteer roles were widely advertised and client centred interviews enabled us to select the right personalities and understand each applicant's skills. Volunteers are required to attend 26 h of training including familiarisation with the hospice before commencement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The skill set and diversity of volunteers has added greatly to hospice life. Volunteers skills include massage, hairdressers, musicians, doctors, actors, and students thus expanding the range of services we can offer to guests. Committed volunteers may be offered the opportunity to undertake further training and fulfil an &lsquo;Advanced Volunteer&rsquo; role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The project has experienced challenges in ensuring that all staff embrace the benefits of care team volunteers. Introducing &lsquo;Managing Volunteers&rsquo; training for staff helped to address this. Future plans include extended training and setting more rigorous induction to encourage only the most committed volunteers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>With stringent selection, training and supervision care team volunteers can significantly enhance patient experience through normalisation and enhanced activities, an additional benefit has been the embedding of the hospice in our local community.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bridge, W., Barklie, K., Westmorland, S., Cook, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Physiotherapy, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Care team volunteers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>220</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>220</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/221-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The journey from paediatric intensive care to children's hospice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/221-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Approximately 2/3 of PICU patients who die, do so as a result of withdrawal of treatment, most of these deaths occur on PICU. We have set out to examine referrals from PICU at the John Radcliffe Hospital, to Children's Hospices over a 5-year period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Investigate year-wise trend in PICU referrals to Hospices</p>
</li><li>
<p> Examine the outcomes</p>
</li><li>
<p> Examine the process of transfer to non-hospital settings</p>
</li><li>
<p> Inform practice.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Retrospective review of case notes for all children referred from a large tertiary level UK PICU to Children's Hospices over a 5-year period. Information was collected both from PICU and from the two hospices involved.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 12 children were transferred, with referrals increasing over time. 2/3 of the children were aged 2&ndash;8 years, and the mean stay on PICU prior to transfer was 13 days. The average time from initial referral to transfer was 4 days. Discussions about limitation of treatment occurred after an average of 9 days of ventilation, with 2/3 of families having had prior contact with the palliative care team involved. 1/3 the patients were still on invasive ventilation at the time of transfer, and all of those were escorted by a PICU Consultant, of these, 3/4 were extubated within 30 min of arrival at the hospice. Overall, eight children died following transfer, but four children (1/3) survived for &gt; 2 weeks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>It was pleasing to confirm an increase in joint working between PICU and Children's Hospices. Consistent with other studies, we have shown that 1/3 of children transferred for end of life care, initially survive. Information gained from reviewing these cases contributed to setting up a working party to produce a care pathway to support extubation within a children's palliative care framework, which is due to be published this year.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harrop, E., Gupta, N., Lapwood, S., Shefler, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.49</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.49</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Adult intensive care, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The journey from paediatric intensive care to children's hospice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>221</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>221</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/221-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing user engagement]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/221-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This child and young adult hospice has a strong commitment to user engagement to meet CQC requirements and as an essential component of a patient centred approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>A 6 month secondment reviewed current practice and planned future work. The priority was to ensure that all ages and abilities were included in participation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Current practice was compared with other hospices and assessed using the Children's Hospices UK User Participation Toolkit. Writing KPIs clarified goals. The patient group was segmented by age and ability to ensure that appropriate methods of engagement were used. Patients and parents were surveyed using questionnaire or semi-structured interview.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A range of options were presented by parents and patients including the use of social media, and online communication. Focus groups are successful regarding specific issues only, but less useful to evaluate ongoing experience. Recording the anecdotal, and engaging care staff in doing so, adds richness to the more formal methods of engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The ability to offer feedback to a neutral person (eg, a volunteer) encourages participation. Use of communication resources designed for specific groups, such as those with learning disabilities promotes engagement. For some this may be the only time they have been asked their opinion and they may need to be empowered. However it is important to manage expectations, it is not always possible to act upon feedback gathered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Meaningful user engagement with this diverse client group requires creative methods to enable all to participate. Being able to draw on the broad skills of the care team and dedicated staff time is required to ensure that user views are listened to. How the organisation responds to the users' views and the rationale must be feedback to the user. Further work should extend to other service users, for example, volunteers and fundraisers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cook, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.50</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.50</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics), Child and adolescent psychiatry, Disability]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing user engagement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>221</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>221</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/221-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prolonged parental access to their child's body following death - a help or hindrance in the bereavement outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/221-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The first children's hospice was established 30 years ago and included a cooled bedroom where the child's body could be cared for in the hospice until the funeral. This was seen as a crucial aspect of the care extended to grieving families, allowing them to say goodbye to their child in their own way over several days, within a supported environment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Problem identified</st>
<p>This practice has been replicated in over 40 subsequent children's hospices, but minimal research has evaluated the impact of this aspect of support on families. Thus a service is being offered which has not been validated as beneficial. Policies guiding this aspect of service delivery are based on practice experience and anecdotal evidence with practices differing across the country.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methodology</st>
<p>A literature review was carried out to identify what is known about the impact on bereavement outcomes for parents who have prolonged access to their child's body beyond the immediate hours following death. Related literature looking at the impact of viewing stillborn babies or adult bodies following unexpected death and post organ donation was included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>While most literature suggested unspecified benefits to bereaved relatives from accessing dead bodies, there was one notable exception in stillbirth studies which indicated higher levels of anxiety and depression in mothers who had held their stillborn baby. Few studies measured the impact of access to the body on bereavement outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Recommendations</st>
<p>There is urgent need for research to identify the impact of this service on the bereavement outcome of parents, looking at both benefits and potential risks. This research should inform service development in terms of governance within children's hospices. Furthermore, new evidence will be added to the understanding of factors influencing bereavement outcomes for parents.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cornish, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.51</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.51</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pregnancy, Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics), Child and adolescent psychiatry, Artificial and donated transplantation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prolonged parental access to their child's body following death - a help or hindrance in the bereavement outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>221</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>221</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/221-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The intelligence hub approach to sharing and learning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/221-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The term &lsquo;intelligence&rsquo; derives &lsquo;from the Latin verb intelligere which in turn comes from inter-legere meaning to "pick out" or discern.&rsquo; Here it encapsulates the processing and sharing of gathered data, experiences and other information to develop knowledge, highlight innovation and demonstrate the impact of hospice care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Case studies are a powerful example of those experiences which contribute to hospice care intelligence. Providing a practical approach to learning and facilitating networking, they encourage service development and the sharing of new ideas and innovation. We are developing a case study resource bank to share experiences and practical project learning with hospice colleagues.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Approach</st>
<p>This ongoing project is creating a new resource by collating existing and researching new case study materials for various audiences. The value and impact of access to this fledgling case study resource is indicated by the example of work done by the national fundraising support team in gathering case studies on income generation to share on the members' area of our website. A hospice adopted a new community engagement idea outlined in a case study from this resource. The activity raised significant additional income for the hospice and has now been incorporated into their annual income generation programme.</p>
<p>To help raise the profile of hospice care and inspire innovation, the project team invite hospice and palliative care colleagues to contact us with activity updates and project news so that, together, we can more effectively share information on emerging work and ideas in hospice care delivery and development.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hodson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.52</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.52</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The intelligence hub approach to sharing and learning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>221</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>222</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/222-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[End of life quality matters (EOLQM): a quality improvement programme in Hertfordshire]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/222-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The EOLQM is a collaborative education project between a local community health service and hospice. It was designed to encourage participants to identify an integrated approach to planning, contracting and measuring end of life care (EOLC) service delivery across health and social care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To facilitate a more collaborative approach to EOLC and increasing insight/empathy into the work of other professionals working in end of life care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>41/2 days and 1 full day for course evaluation and project presentation</p>
<p>Day 1: Introduction to the programme/Audit/Research/Evaluation</p>
<p>Day 2: Multi professional</p>
<p>Day 3: Change Management</p>
<p>Day 4: Project work</p>
<p>Day 5: Advance Care Planning and project presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>16 participants attended from learning disabilities, district nursing, palliative care and mental health providers.</p>
<p>Pre and post course questionnaires showed a confidence increase in use of audit, working across boundaries and team dynamics. The course was highly evaluated. Project areas: manual handling training programme for families/informal carers, design, end of life pathway for learning disabilities, research and review of the key worker programme, design of an effective and standardised document to communicate advance care plan wishes, re-launch of the Liverpool Care Pathway.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>EOLQM brought together staff from a variety of disciples and settings enabling them to discover and work together on projects to benefit patients at the end of life. By focussing on measuring and evaluating what we do across boundaries, it enabled participants to start to influence strategy in their own work setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>EOLC is not just concerned with symptom control and communication skills. It also needs to be measured and evaluated and those working at the coal face have their part to play in this &ndash; not only through providing data but also designing how and what data should be captured.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garrood, E., Russell, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.53</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.53</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Child and adolescent psychiatry, Disability, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[End of life quality matters (EOLQM): a quality improvement programme in Hertfordshire]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>222</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>222</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/222-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Three years of living with grief - reviewing a series of meetings for people who have been bereaved]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/222-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Highland Hospice Bereavement Support Service offers varied support to individuals and families. For the past 3 years, in order to widen the support options available and recognising people's differing needs, we have been offering Living With Grief, a time limited group-based support.</p>
<p>The current programme consists of:<l type="tab"><li><p> Weekly sessions of 2 h duration, offered over an 8 week period.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Groups co-facilitated by two staff members; both accredited counsellors, with extensive group work experience.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Group membership mixed in circumstances of bereavement, age, gender and ethnic/cultural background.</p>
</li><li>
<p> &lsquo;Closed&rsquo; group membership; all members attending all meetings.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To review the development of the Living With Grief programme. Particular attention is paid to how the programme has adapted in response to both feedback from the participants and the facilitators' experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Review the current provision.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Review participant evaluation over the 3 year period.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Review facilitator experiences.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Review changes already made as a result of this feedback and evaluation.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> The programme has changed significantly over the 3 year period.</p>
</li><li>
<p> The changes have resulted from participant feedback and facilitator experience.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Feedback from later participants confirmed the desirability of the earlier changes and suggests a constructive dialectic process of development.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>As a result of this project review we plan to continue offering Living With Grief as a regular feature of the Highland Hospice Bereavement Service. The findings and recommendations from this review will be of interest to other hospices involved in developing and/or reviewing group support provision in bereavement services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smale, U., Spence, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.54</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.54</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Three years of living with grief - reviewing a series of meetings for people who have been bereaved]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>222</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>222</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/222-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical compassion]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/222-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Sometimes, people coming into specialist palliative care units unexpectedly improve with simple, compassionate care. Is this a mystery? Or does compassion directly affect human biology in ways we are only just beginning to understand?</p>
<p>There is a widespread belief that kindness and compassion matter. They are what we would want for ourselves, or our loved ones; central, across religions and across cultures; taken as "given" by patients and families; and required by NHS constitution. Yet they are often absent, education and policy documents, and from clinical care settings. Educating for compassion remains an uncertain art.</p>
<p>A Masters thesis, (awarded a distinction by the University of Oxford, 2010) explores the biological impact of compassion on the brain and the body, including its effects on the &mu;-opioid receptor system and the autonomic nervous system, as well as its observable effects on distress. Compassion switches on the &mu;-opioid receptor system. Compassion directly affects the human body in ways that are conducive to healing and wellbeing. Moreover, the neural circuits of compassion are contagious via the mirror neuron system and they can be trained and developed using the brains inherent capacity to remodel its neural circuits with practice (neuroplasticity).</p>
<p>A simple model of the neural basis of the primary compassion pathway, and its positive and negative modulators gives a starting point for developing more effective educational and organisational strategies for compassion. One promising approach to developing compassion is by using mindfulness training, such as mindfulness based cognitive therapy (MBCT). A small pilot study of MBCT training for Hospice at Home nurses shows acceptability, and measurable impact on wellbeing, self compassion and clinical empathy. Could this be one way of re-prioritising compassion in healthcare systems?</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palmer, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.55</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.55</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Psychotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical compassion]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>222</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>223</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/223-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospice support services from diagnosis to infinity and beyond ....]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/223-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Completion of a research thesis, as part of an MA in Hospice Leadership, led to the development of a new concept of Hospice Support, concordant with the North West End of Life Care Model.</p>
<p>This brings together the diverse range of Hospice Services with the intention of Hospice moving from being complementary to the PHCT, to one which is prepared to take ownership and leadership on key areas of community based palliative and end of life care development.</p>
<p>Develop a new concept of Hospice Support, by reforming services to work under one umbrella, including medical, social and psychological disciplines within the Hospice team, maximising the use of appropriately trained volunteers.</p>
<p>Develop a protocol for family support, continuing into bereavement.</p>
<p>Social, emotional, psychological, spiritual needs of patients, carers and their families were strategically reviewed.</p>
<p>Creation of a new Hospice Support Services &lsquo;Hub&rsquo;, where the social, emotional and psychological needs of patients, carers and their families are reviewed on a weekly basis, taking cognisance of their medical needs.</p>
<p>Allocation of a lead professional to liaise with the referred person throughout their involvement with Hospice Support.</p>
<p>The development of a comprehensive and structured pre and post bereavement follow-up; following 40 h training time for Family and Bereavement Support Volunteers.</p>
<p>A variety of new services are being developed, together with new opportunities for volunteers, including;<l type="tab"><li><p> Open-ended Support groups; Patients, carers and bereaved</p>
</li><li>
<p> Creative therapeutic groups; patients, carers, bereaved</p>
</li><li>
<p> Support volunteers; Patients, carers</p>
</li><li>
<p> Family and Bereavement Support Volunteers</p>
</li><li>
<p> Complementary therapies</p>
</li><li>
<p> One to one support; Complex Cases</p>
</li><li>
<p> Living for Today closed groups; Patients, Carers.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Despite the challenge of change we are developing a continuing support service for patients, their carers and families who have varying individual needs at different times in the end of life trajectory of the patient.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hewitt, L., Green, C., Bober, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.56</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.56</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Complementary medicine, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospice support services from diagnosis to infinity and beyond ....]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>223</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/223-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seamless service on the isle of man]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/223-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The hospice movement has engendered a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) approach to the delivery of palliative care and the evolvement of the Palliative Care Clinical Nurse Specialist (PCCNS). Advancements in palliative care and better symptom management have seen a change in the PCCNS role so that patients and carers are now often seen from diagnosis to post bereavement. It is ever more essential that PCCNSs are skilled in co-ordinating and communicating with the MDT, patients and families.</p>
<p>With this in mind in 2008 a review of the islands PCCNS service was carried out to identify any gaps in the service; explore user's perceptions and expectations; consider the team leader role and produce recommendations to service development.</p>
<p>At the time, four community PCCNSs were attached to GP surgeries within a geographical area, while two PCCNSs provided a service to the local hospitals. The comprehensive review confirmed that the service was valued by patients and health professionals on the island, but highlighted that more time was needed for the team leader to provide leadership, supervision and planning and for the PCCNSs to embrace education, audit and consultancy work.</p>
<p>It was felt that an integrated nursing approach (where the PCCNSs followed their patients both in hospital and the community) would eliminate duplication of effort in gathering information and relationship building, thereby releasing time for other duties and improving communication. Caseloads were redistributed and a 6 month pilot was initiated.</p>
<p>Service users and the PCCNSs were canvassed at the end of the pilot. The general feedback was that the patient experience was better and that communication and the PCCNSs job satisfaction had improved. The team elected to continue working in this new way therefore enhancing the patient and family experience and providing a seamless service.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bloomer, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.57</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.57</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Nursing, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seamless service on the isle of man]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>223</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/223-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fundraising matters: communication skills training for non-clinical hospice staff]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/223-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Communication skills training is traditionally directed towards clinicians. At St Francis we identified a need to support our fundraising staff in their confidence in their daily conversations. These conversations often included distressed bereaved relatives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To increase the communication skills and confidence of fundraising staff in the community and public setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A 1/2 day interactive workshop using videoed role play with a Connected actor, facilitator and communication skills trainer. The role play was based upon scenarios provided by the fundraisers prior to the workshop. They completed a pre and post workshop confidence questionnaire and a follow-up one 3 months later.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>11 fundraising staff attended.</p>
<p>Scenarios revolved around distressed relatives (expected and unexpected), and questions about care and dying in the context of fundraising for the hospice. Pre and post course questionnaires showed an increase in confidence in challenging conversations. The workshop was highly evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Fundraising staff do not necessarily have the day to day experience of clinical conversations to draw upon, but bereaved families have the same expectations of them as clinical staff in terms of conveying empathy and compassion.</p>
</li><li>
<p> There is a parallel agenda of empathy versus receiving a donation, eliciting a "story" or discussing a fundraising event.</p>
</li><li>
<p> The communication challenges are similar to clinicians and the power of silence is a similar take home message.</p>
</li><li>
<p> The advantages of using videoed role play include giving participants the chance to see and discuss things they might have missed first time around.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Fundraising staff have similar communication training motivation as clinical staff. The workshop was a worthwhile education event, albeit seeming too short &ndash; in the future it would be beneficial to mix more non-clinical staff to give a wider breadth of discussion and experience &ndash; this is planned for later in 2011.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell, S., Jo, F., Doughty, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.58</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.58</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fundraising matters: communication skills training for non-clinical hospice staff]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>224</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/224-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The ABC to education: collaborating, coordinating and contributing to end of life care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/224-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The ABC End of Life Programme is a blended approach to end of life education across the East of England regions of Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire, Anglia and Essex. It has been funded by NHS East of England for 2 years. It represents collaboration across settings contributing to the improvement of the end of life care experience for staff, patients and families.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To improve the end of life experience of patients and carers (including advance care planning) and reduce inappropriate hospital admissions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>An education programme using the specifically designed East of England Care Home education programme, ELCA modules and mentor support. Aim is to deliver over 2 years to 1800 care home staff and 5000 workforce B staff. Activity and impact is measured using a combination of benchmarking tools, patient notes audit, confidence questionnaires and educational activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Pre and post course questionnaires showed a confidence increase in end of life care. Activity measurement showed an increase in accessing other education sessions as well as in house end of life care policies and procedures (eg, bereavement policies). Data referring to inappropriate hospital admissions will be shown.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The programme content and measurement was debated and designed through a combination of palliative care educators, clinicians, commissioners, lead nurses and EOE End of Life lead. This combined approach although challenging in terms of coordination enabled an approach to education that could then be measured across a much bigger geographical region.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>It is challenging to design education programmes across settings and borders &ndash; but it is worthwhile as it provides a systematic approach to delivery and measurement. Using a blended education approach (face to face facilitation/e learning) enables learning to be work based relevant and centred.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell, S., Doyle, C., Harris, E. J., Convey, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.59</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.59</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The ABC to education: collaborating, coordinating and contributing to end of life care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>224</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>224</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/224-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ultrasound scanning in a hospice setting - does it really alter patient pathways?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/224-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Bedside ultrasound scanning in a hospice setting is a new initiative. Historically, the hospice has referred patients to the local hospital, requiring a 20 min journey accompanied by relatives or nurse and ambulance crew.</p>
<p>A review of patient experience, revealed that this transfer was often distressing and futile.</p>
<p>A donation allowed an Ultrasound Scanner to be purchased. Three hospice doctors attended accredited training with specific tuition in ascites detection and diagnostic bladder scanning.</p>
<p>Now all patients with possible ascites are scanned prior to drainage.</p>
<p>Patients with bladder problems such as anuria, oliguria, haematuria and bladder pain are also scanned.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To assess the clinical benefits of ultrasound scanning within our hospice. To aid clinical diagnosis, enhance experience and improve outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective case note study of all ultrasound procedures carried out within the inpatient unit and day hospice at St Francis. The clinical indication for each scan is noted. Scan findings and the clinical outcome is noted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Patients were scanned for the following clinical indications:<l type="ord"><li><p>Possible ascites.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Bladder problems.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Cholestatic jaundice</p>
</li><li>
<p>Training purposes.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Ascites scan assessment</p>
<p>Positive ascites scan= 7</p>
<p>Negative ascites scan= 11</p>
<p>Number of resulting paracentesis= 7</p>
<p>Bladder scan = 8</p>
<p>Abnormal finding noted= 2</p>
<p>Normal bladder noted= 6</p>
<p>Complications= 0</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Bedside scans prevent distressing transfer to hospital and unnecessary procedures when time is short. Patients feel this imaging is neither intrusive nor distressing. Future developments include video linking for instant radiological opinion, a new probe to assess for deep vein thrombosis and scans at home.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We have limitations with our brief training and have therefore developed links with the radiology team for feedback and support. Bedside ultrasounds are non-invasive and well tolerated, aiding diagnosis, safety and outcomes for patients with suspected ascites or bladder problems.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nemeth, E., Cate, W., Sharon, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.60</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.60</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pancreas and biliary tract, Urology, Pain (neurology), Venous thromboembolism, Radiology, Clinical diagnostic tests, Urological surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ultrasound scanning in a hospice setting - does it really alter patient pathways?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>224</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>224</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/225-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What a waste! Futile prescribing and the cost of wasted medication at the end of life]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/225-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Poor prognostication leads to continuation of potentially irrelevant, expensive and harmful medications when time is short, for example, statins.</p>
<p>Similarly, necessary medications are over-prescribed in large amounts, when the patient may only have days to live.</p>
<p>When a patient dies, all these drugs are destroyed, even those in original sealed packs.</p>
<p>The cumulative cost of destroyed medication is huge &ndash; at a time when the NHS can ill- afford such wastage.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To assess the extent of irrelevant prescriptions in a cohort of patients admitted to a hospice for terminal care.</p>
<p>To analyse the annual cost of irrelevant prescribing and drugs for destruction after a patients death in a UK inpatient 12 bedded hospice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective survey of:<l type="tab"><li><p> All drugs brought into the hospice at the time of terminal admission</p>
</li><li>
<p> Analysis of key medication groups, highlighting those irrelevant in a patient with weeks or days to live</p>
</li><li>
<p> Cost analysis of medications deemed irrelevant by two experienced hospice physicians</p>
</li><li>
<p> Cost analysis of drugs destroyed after a patients death.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Expected outcomes:<l type="tab"><li><p> Prescribing patterns at the end of life, highlighting extent of futile prescriptions.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Estimated cost to the NHS of destroyed drugs following a year of patient deaths.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Prescribing is an art, and medicines are harmful to patients if not relevant. Lack of continuity in primary care and infrequent review of dying patients may lead to prescribing of inappropriate and costly drugs. This a burden to the patient and to the NHS, with large amounts of medication being destroyed after death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The study is in progress &ndash; when finalised, a total cost of destroyed drugs in one UK hospice will indicate a massive national problem.</p>
<p>Suggestions will be made as to how this cost burden could be reduced, underpinned by more appropriate prescribing when time is short.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor, R., Bryant, M., Chadwick, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.61</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.61</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What a waste! Futile prescribing and the cost of wasted medication at the end of life]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>225</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>225</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/225-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychological contracts of hospice nurses]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/225-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>The aim of this research was to examine the context of psychological contracts of hospice nurses, to explore what they might contain, and also to establish how the contracts might be influenced, with a specific exploration of what may breach the contracts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The psychological contract is a cognitive perceptual model, that is, the contract is in the minds of the employees, and consists of the reciprocated obligations, expectations and contributions that exist between the employer and employee.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methodology</st>
<p>The study involved in-depth interviews following a modified constructivist grounded theory approach, using the model proposed by Charmaz (2006). Using a purposeful sample, 10 nurses from four hospices across North Wales and the North West participated in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Four main categories emerged within this study: type of psychological contract, how the contracts are formed, the contents and the breaches. The Psychological contracts held by hospice nurses appear to be complex, and analysis found potential multidimensional, multi-level and multi-agent contracting. The contents contained generic items, that is, items that may be seen with any employee in any organisation, however, there were idiosyncratic elements, these included detail of care, relieving distressing symptoms, recognising individual employees in the workplace, quality of care, time to care, and acceptance of reduced terms and conditions. Some of the more serious breaches/violations perceived by the nurses included: lack of access to education, inequitable treatment among staff, and some nurses felt undervalued with very little recognition of their contribution. Hospices should take these findings into account when considering the employer&ndash;employee relationship; failure to do so may lead to negative consequences for the organisation, for example reduced loyalty to the organisation, a desire to leave or a negative changes in the attitude or behaviour of staff.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, A., Sambrook, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.62</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.62</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality improvement]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychological contracts of hospice nurses]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>225</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>225</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/225-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Innovative approach by the hospice involvement in schools national curriculum]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/225-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This project aimed to offer schools within the local catchment area and opportunity for the Hospice to work collaboratively alongside them with delivery of the National Educational Curriculum of Personal, Social, Health and Economic Education.</p>
<p>A resource pack was produced and posted to 29 secondary schools and 1 college in the catchment area to offer a tailor made programme for their school curriculum focusing around Personal, Social, Health, Economic education and Sex and relationships Education related topics.</p>
<p>The initial response from secondary schools was poor so the project had a second phase and this was to target 123 junior/infant schools in the catchment area.</p>
<p>The delayed response to the project was due to postal issues and not being able to identify a key worker in each school who leads PSHE. Schools curriculum planning and demands on teaching staff also affected the timetabling of additional educational sessions. Many schools showed an interest but never progressed to planning sessions directly.</p>
<p>From a further redesign of the project we have established direct links with 32 PSHE leads in our area and delivered training sessions to them high lighting areas of education which we are able to offer as bespoke sessions, developing interest already. One school has had two sessions delivered in the Hospice enabling staff and students to meet patients and learn about the Hospice and other topics. Another school has had sessions delivered in the school working with the Duke of Edinburgh students enabling fundraising for the Hospice. Two schools have had assemblies with question and answer sessions enabling us to dispel the myths of a Hospice.</p>
<p>The findings indicate that schools are satisfied that the Hospice is able to support them in delivering individualised programmes. The collaborative working has had a positive impact on the schools and Hospice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freeman, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.63</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.63</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Innovative approach by the hospice involvement in schools national curriculum]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>225</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>226</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/226-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Electronic prescribing & drug ordering in palliative care - patient & healthcare professional benefits]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/226-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>St Catherine's Hospice has been &lsquo;paperless&rsquo; since 2007 with all clinical notes and communications for hospice and community patients on Crosscare clinical management system (CMS) software (Advanced Health and Care) except the drug prescription and administration record card. The pharmacy has a secure live link to the CMS.</p>
<p>We have now embarked on a project to implement electronic prescribing and drug ordering. The initial stage has been to identify potential benefits.</p>
<p>Key patient benefits of electronic prescribing include:<l type="tab"><li><p> Increased safety at the point of prescribing &ndash; flags drug interactions, allergies, medicine information (MI) pop ups for drugs as prescribed.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Handwriting and &lsquo;inky scribbles&rsquo; eradicated.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Dispensing turnaround times reduced.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Consistent and &lsquo;approved&rsquo; MI for healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in care 24/7 and for patient education.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Key benefits for HCPs include:<l type="tab"><li><p> Live up-to-date drug history and current regimen available 24/7 anywhere with web access.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Education tool &ndash; EMIS datasheet pop up PLUS any local practice guidelines pop ups where appropriate.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Audits facilitated via database interrogation and reporting.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Major aid for &lsquo;treatment re-capping&rsquo; at HCP/patient counselling and consultations.</p>
</li><li>
<p> &lsquo;On call&rsquo; remote prescribing enabled eradicating &lsquo;verbal orders&rsquo; issues.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Key pharmacy specific benefits include:<l type="tab"><li><p> Enables remote prescription monitoring from any PC anywhere with web access. Clinical information conveniently available to pharmacist on screen.</p>
</li><li>
<p> CDs consistently prescribed legally.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Electronic stock requisitioning streamlines supply function and management functions such as invoicing and drug use and expenditure analysis.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Up to date prescriptions, medication history and regimens live in pharmacy.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Having identified numerous benefits, the next phase of the project will entail development of standard operating procedures and education of key staff.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bunn, R., Brayden, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.64</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.64</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Immunology (including allergy), Hospice, Unwanted effects / adverse reactions, Information management]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Electronic prescribing & drug ordering in palliative care - patient & healthcare professional benefits]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>226</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>226</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/226-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An innovative approach to creating a hospice at home team]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/226-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This project uses an innovative approach to creating a new Hospice at Home team. The team aims to deliver a service that can respond quickly with a flexible and adaptable approach to meeting the needs of people who are in the last week of their lives and who wish to remain at, or return, home. It also incorporates the needs of families and carers. The service does not offer aspects of care which require a Registered Nurse and therefore works very closely with Primary Healthcare teams.</p>
<p>The team comprises of a Registered Nurse Team Co-ordinator, Staff Nurse and 14 whole time equivalent Healthcare Assistants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To keep decision making as close to the patient's situation as possible in order to deliver a fast, flexible and appropriate response to rapidly changing needs and situations.</p>
<p>To create a service that delivers not just personal care but which uses a creative approach to supporting people who wish to remain at home at the end of their lives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Developing the assessment and decision making skills of the Healthcare Assistants who deliver the care. This empowers them to assess, plan, deliver and evaluate patient's care needs directly.</p>
<p>Flexible approach to needs assessment looking at all aspects of patient's, and their families', requirements. Not just focusing on personal care of the patient but what the whole family situation requires in order for the person to remain at home. For example, house work, shopping, meal preparation, etc.</p>
<p>Utilising the Hospice volunteer base to meet needs that cannot be delivered by the Heath Care Assistants. For example, garden maintenance and simple household maintenance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Evaluation</st>
<p>Project will be evaluated through the use of families and carer's satisfaction surveys and audit of the number of patient's who achieve their preferred place of death.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whitmore, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.65</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.65</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An innovative approach to creating a hospice at home team]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>226</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>226</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/226-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An audit around preferred place of death: one UK hospice experience]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/226-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>According to the End of Life Care Strategy, good end of life care includes choosing a place of care for one's death. It is easy to assume that all hospice patients discuss their wishes and that plans for death are recorded. The audit data in this paper, however, suggests that such planning is not universal and asks questions about why this might be so.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To present an audit of 150 hospice case notes to show the documentation of patients' preferred place of death over a 2 year period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>As phase one of a PhD research study, case notes of deceased patients were accessed from January 2008 (n=50); January 2009 (n=50) and January 2010 (n=50) during September &ndash; November 2010. Data collected included actual place of death, whether preferred place of death was documented, whether preferences were achieved, whether patients had conversations about end of life care options; whether wishes were reviewed and which professionals recorded information. The 2 year time frame represented a range of experiences within the hospice context. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Results illustrated that place of death was varied; that preferred place of death was recorded in only 18.7% of cases and of this very small number whose wishes were documented, the majority (89.3%) died in their chosen location. Only 10.6% of the sample recorded conversations about preferences, and reviews were infrequent (21%) with few changes of preference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This research demonstrates that identification, documentation and review of preferred place of death was achieved for only a small percentage of patients of this hospice during 2008&ndash;2010. This prompts further research questions around why this is so.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walker, S., Read, S., Priest, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.66</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.66</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An audit around preferred place of death: one UK hospice experience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>226</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>227</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/227-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A cooperative participative inquiry into the effectiveness of a bereavement drop-in service]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/227-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Starting from a position that users of a hospice based bereavement service reported that the current drop-in was assisting in their coping and movement through grief, a study was undertaken to examine in detail the service users claims and to ascertain what factors led to the drop-in being &lsquo;effective&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key concepts</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Cooperative participative inquiry</p>
</li><li>
<p> Action research</p>
</li><li>
<p> Phenomenology</p>
</li><li>
<p> Epistemology</p>
</li><li>
<p> Relational depth</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A Cooperative Participative Inquiry (CPI) model was used. Heron (1996) and Reason (2001) argue that CPI as a science of the person puts the emphasis on &lsquo;first person&rsquo; research and thus locates the participant at the heart of the research inquiry.</p>
<p>Drop-in users volunteered to become co research participants in the research. Ethical approval was sought through the hospice research committee. Four phases were identified-agreeing the area of activity, engagement in the actions agreed, observation and recording of process and outcome, immersion and engagement of experience and finally re-assemblage and discussion of the project in the light of the experience. Results were written up, discussed and agreed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> As a form of assistance for bereavement support the drop-in was effective</p>
</li><li>
<p> Peer support was considered vital</p>
</li><li>
<p> Forming of relationships between users and staff was central to creating a &lsquo;safe space&rsquo;</p>
</li><li>
<p> Drop-in was perceived as validating of users experience, non-medicalising of their grief.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The research has implications for person-centred care and highlights the continuing medicalisation and pathologising of grief.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Although the process is intense, the results are a testament to the group. User involvement in research in this manner ensures the &lsquo;voice&rsquo; of users are heard, that client experiences are accepted and validated and that stigma and pathology are reduced.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nash, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.67</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.67</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A cooperative participative inquiry into the effectiveness of a bereavement drop-in service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>227</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/227-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introducing an end of life education programme in a mental health unit for the elderly]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/227-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>More people are dying with dementia. In recognition of this the National Dementia Strategy (2009) focuses on the provision of care for their end of life needs. Following an audit of patients referred from a mental health unit for the elderly to a hospital palliative care team, an end of life education programme was developed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The aims of the programme were to help staff recognise impending death, promote competence and confidence in symptom management and communication around death and dying. Funding was obtained for 1 year from April 2010 through end of life care monies, and existing resources pooled to supplement the proposal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The main elements of the programme were the introduction of the Gold Standards Framework (GSF), the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP), 3-day communication courses and specialist palliative care placements at the local hospice. There was a lead for each element. A programme of &lsquo;bite- sized teaching sessions&rsquo; and workshops was designed and coordinated by the Practice Development Team which incorporated the &lsquo;wants and needs&rsquo; of the unit. Teaching was adapted for all staff and multiple teaching styles used. The LCP was modified as syringe drivers were not used on the unit. 14 staff were nominated from the centre to become End of Life Care Advisors with varying levels of expertise and representation from all the wards. The advisors received priority teaching and their role was to disseminate information, support others, maintain and update resource folders on the wards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Evaluations of every aspect of the project are showing positive increases in confidence and competence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The project has been a catalyst for multi-disciplinary learning. The flexibility of teaching styles is innovative and potentially transferable to other settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cooke, C., Dixon, R., Broadhurst, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.68</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.68</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Memory disorders (psychiatry), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introducing an end of life education programme in a mental health unit for the elderly]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>227</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/227-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding life-threatening illness - exploring individual experiences of living with cancer]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/227-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>"A few decades ago, cancer was a topic shrouded in social silence. Today...stories of cancer illness have found a place in our culture. The emergence of this discourse means that those who become ill with cancer can expect some degree of acceptance and understanding. The same cannot be said, however, about all those who survive cancer. Despite the interest that is often generated by stories of survival...there still remain unresolved tensions for those who have lived beyond the acute phase of extreme experience."</p>
<p>This study, which originates from my practice as a social worker in the field of palliative care and formed part of my doctoral studies, sought to uncover and explore some of these &lsquo;unresolved tensions&rsquo; in the lives of those who are experiencing cancer as a long-term condition.</p>
<p>I aimed in this study to give individuals who were living &lsquo;with and beyond cancer&rsquo; the opportunity to talk about their experiences, both during the treatment phase and beyond, in order to explore the meaning of this experience, and therefore to increase the body of public and professional knowledge in this field.</p>
<p>I conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 people who were living with cancer as a long-term condition, simultaneously analysing these narratives using a grounded theory approach.</p>
<p>My findings from this study were that, overwhelmingly, individuals experienced cancer as life-changing, not only in terms of their own personal development and attitudes to life, but also in how they related to the people around them, including health and social care professionals.</p>
<p>While recognising the individual nature of each person's experience, the findings of my study have provided an invaluable insight into the psychosocial needs of people living with cancer, which I aim to disseminate to professionals and policymakers, to increase understanding and enhance aftercare in cancer &lsquo;survivorship&rsquo;.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taplin, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.69</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.69</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding life-threatening illness - exploring individual experiences of living with cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>227</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/228-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A project to enable tissue donation for research purposes]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/228-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>When hospice patients asked about organ and tissue donation we had little to offer them, as patients with malignancy are normally limited to donating corneas. This paper describes a project enabling patients to donate tissue for research purposes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>The project</st>
<p>We worked in partnership with our local bone and tissue bank, who have experience in using tissue from both live and deceased donors (eg, bone from patients who have a hip replacement). Our local NHS Research Ethics Committee agreed a proposal to enable patients to donate tissue after their death. Small samples are taken from up to 35 different tissues/organs and these can be used by pharmaceutical companies or research groups, with ethical approval. The project was approved by the Hospice Board of Trustees.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>The consent process</st>
<p>During end of life discussions consultants will raise the issue if appropriate. If patients wish to know more, they are given information leaflets describing various donation options, including corneal donation. Consent is taken by a consultant and a senior member of the bone bank. Patients specify which tissues/organs they are happy to have samples taken from. Unlike organ donation, relatives cannot consent on a patient's behalf after death. If the relative withdraws consent after death, then we do not proceed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Tissue retrieval</st>
<p>After death, the bone bank is informed and makes the arrangements. The body is moved to our hospital mortuary and samples are taken. The body is then restored in appearance and taken to an undertaker of the family's choice within 14 h.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Problems &ndash; or lack of them</st>
<p>Patients and their families have been very supportive of the project. One challenge is that the body cannot be moved, nor retrieval take place, until a death certificate has been issued. This potentially limits the project for patients who die at home.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Waterhouse, E., Feathers, L., Roberts, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.70</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.70</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Ophthalmology, End of life decisions (palliative care), Artificial and donated transplantation, End of life decisions (ethics), Research and publication ethics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A project to enable tissue donation for research purposes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>228</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/228-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A service development to educate healthcare assistants about physical rehabilitation in an in-patient hospice unit]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/228-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Rehabilitation is a specialty in its own right, with a powerful emphasis on inter-professional working to help patients improve their independence. Due to medical advances people with life limiting illnesses are living longer and even though they will not be cured rehabilitation has a vital role in improving their lives over the time they have ahead. This concept may seem strange in the context of palliative care but the goals of rehabilitation and palliative care are the same in helping a person to become as active and independent as possible.</p>
<p>The aim of this service development is to educate Healthcare Assistants (HCAs) to promote a physical rehabilitation approach in a 31 bedded in-patient hospice unit that focuses on independence.</p>
<p>A series of education and practice interventions were developed. They were implemented through group tutorials, display boards and clinical facilitation, with an evaluation of all of these strategies.</p>
<p>It has shown that the HCAs who participated found that their knowledge and confidence around the techniques increased. The impact of this service development however was difficult to measure due to poor uptake and evaluation of the educative strategies employed.</p>
<p>This service development has demonstrated that the education of HCAs has the potential to improve the rehabilitation of palliative care patients but that this needs to be delivered in a way that &lsquo;fits around&rsquo; the daily work of HCAs and has to be recognised as an important part in the culture of the hospice.</p>
<p>Those who participated in the service development evaluated it positively, feeling that they were in the position to carry out the techniques and practice with the patients. A further outcome of the development is to consider different ways to provide the classroom teaching and clinical facilitation within the organisation to allow greater participation from staff</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atkinson, R., Jennings, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.71</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.71</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A service development to educate healthcare assistants about physical rehabilitation in an in-patient hospice unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>228</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/228-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What is good end of life care after stroke?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/228-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Stroke is the third commonest cause of death and causes significant symptoms and disability. Acute stroke care in the UK predominantly occurs in hospital. Guidelines recommend that patients should be cared for in stroke units to improve survival and disability.</p>
<p>The End of Life Care (EOLC) Strategy aims to improve care for all irrespective of diagnosis and place of care. Previous research suggests that stroke patients and families have unmet palliative care needs. Researching these needs presents challenges due to the effect of stroke on communication, cognition and consciousness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="ord"><li><p>To determine what healthcare professionals on a stroke unit believe constitutes good EOLC for stroke patients.</p>
</li><li>
<p>To determine any barriers exist to implementing good care.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>15 healthcare workers from an acute stroke unit were purposively sampled. Semi-structured interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using framework analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Professionals believed the following were important aspects of end of life care:<l type="tab"><li><p> Treating patients as individuals</p>
</li><li>
<p> Providing care in a dignified manner and in a comfortable environment</p>
</li><li>
<p> Good personal care and symptom control</p>
</li><li>
<p> Ascertaining the needs and monitoring patients</p>
</li><li>
<p> Recognising death</p>
</li><li>
<p> For the team to be aware of the care plan</p>
</li><li>
<p> Informing families and involving them in decisions</p>
</li><li>
<p> Facilitating patient communication and patient-family interaction was also valued</p>
</li><li>
<p> Good team structure, function and training.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Barriers to care included resource and time limitation, competing priorities, difficulties in prognostication and communication and not knowing patients' wishes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Important aspects of care are identified. Healthcare professionals' views led to recommendations which include:<l type="tab"><li><p> Using a care of the dying pathway</p>
</li><li>
<p> Encouraging patients with capacity to discuss their care needs and wishes</p>
</li><li>
<p> Discussion of dying patients care at multidisciplinary meetings</p>
</li><li>
<p> Facilitating patient communication</p>
</li><li>
<p> Educating stroke team in palliative care and palliative care teams in stroke care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Research into prognostication is needed.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffries, C., Shipman, C., Wee, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.72</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.72</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Stroke, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Communication, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What is good end of life care after stroke?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>229</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/229-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advanced liver disease in a homeless population]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/229-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Residents at St Mungo's with alcohol related liver disease frequently experience sudden deaths. There were no prognostic indicators to alert staff that a resident may be nearing the end of life and thus opportunities for possible interventions were not being recognised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To identify whether residents who have advanced alcohol related liver disease show any clinical symptoms or behaviours as they are approaching the end of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method(s)</st>
<p>Examined the summaries of all reported deaths at St Mungo's (Jan 2009&gt;April 2010).</p>
<p>Reviewed 27 sets of case notes of residents with a history of alcohol abuse and possible liver disease</p>
<p>Held three focus group meetings with staff</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A combination of physical, psychological and behavioural symptoms occurred in residents with liver disease as they approached the end of life. Staff did not plan with residents for end of life care and palliative care interventions were minimal. Deaths were often sudden and the majority of end of life care was provided by secondary care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Staff need training to alert them to key changes in residents' condition, so they can anticipate deterioration and death and offer earlier support. This would provide staff with opportunities to discuss preferences for care and palliative interventions with residents. Bereavement support would benefit both staff and residents particularly following a sudden death and encourage discussions on care at the end of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Difficult to predict when a person with liver failure is in the dying phase. However there are increasing physical, psychological and behavioural symptoms which indicate that a resident is in the advanced stages of liver disease. Earlier interventions by staff would enhance the dying experience of residents.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davis, S., Greenish, W., Kennedy, P., Jones, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.73</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.73</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Liver disease, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Drug misuse (including addiction), Alcohol-related disorders, Drugs misuse (including addiction), End of life decisions (ethics), Health education, Housing and health, Health promotion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advanced liver disease in a homeless population]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>229</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>229</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/229-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A report on physiotherapy services for children and young people]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/229-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>There is a recognised difference in the centralised children's services compared with the more localised adult services for those with neuromuscular diseases. At the young people's unit at Martin House transition is a difficult time with uncertainties about the availability and working practices of physiotherapy services for adults.</p>
<p>With funding from the DH as part of the &pound;30million the physiotherapy services in Yorkshire and Humber were reviewed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Contacts were made from a number of sources, starting with known children's services and an email questionnaire was sent. There was a small circulation of questions to users of the service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There was excellent completion circulated after contact had been established by the researcher.</p>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> The paediatric service in the region is well coordinated with close links with respective neuromuscular teams.</p>
</li><li>
<p> The challenge of identifying the different adult services highlighted the possible difficulties faced by people with a neuromuscular condition.</p>
</li><li>
<p> There is variety in the provision and accessibility of adult services offered around the region.</p>
</li><li>
<p> There is a limited review/monitoring service in place for adults with only 42% of teams offering this.</p>
</li><li>
<p> 54% of adult teams are unable to provide on-going physiotherapy. They are usually goal- orientated and based on self-management which isn't always appropriate in a progressive deteriorating condition.</p>
</li><li>
<p> The lack of access to specialist physiotherapy in adult services is a problem for both community and hospice physiotherapists and patients.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Provision of Hydrotherapy is an on-going issue.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Recommendations</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Consideration of a review/monitoring service for adults is needed.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Consideration of a transition service is needed.</p>
</li><li>
<p> There is a need to provide more access to specialist neuromuscular physiotherapists in adult services.</p>
</li><li>
<p> A maintained and accessible database of adult services for these patients should be made available to assist referrers.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davies, J., Miller, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.74</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.74</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Drugs: CNS (not psychiatric), Neuromuscular disease, Physiotherapy, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A report on physiotherapy services for children and young people]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>229</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>229</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/229-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advanced care planning for children]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/229-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Advanced care plans form many functions from acting as a vehicle for discussions to acting as a guide for provision of care in emergencies. Is it possible to satisfy these different demands?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>With the support of a grant from the DH as part of the &pound;30 million funding, a full day meeting was held to develop a Care Plan for children in Yorkshire and Humber. Parent's views were considered in the morning and provider views in the afternoon. Examples of existing care plans were shown to participants and parents spoke about the difficulty in making decisions. The relationship between PICU and palliative care was discussed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The following outcomes were agreed:<l type="tab"><li><p> Care plans should be written for and held by parents</p>
</li><li>
<p> Parents do not need to sign the care plans</p>
</li><li>
<p> Care plans should include a guide to management of predicted symptoms</p>
</li><li>
<p> There should be an agreed format of:</p>
</li><li>
<p> Brief description of present condition</p>
</li><li>
<p> List of contacts;</p>
</li><li>
<p> Brief description of management of symptoms, fits, chest infections etc</p>
</li><li>
<p> Management of slow decline</p>
</li><li>
<p> Management of sudden decline</p>
</li><li>
<p> Back page containing &lsquo;tick box&rsquo; details of levels of resuscitation levels felt</p>
</li><li>
<p> To be appropriate for the child.</p>
</li><li>
<p> The meeting recognised that as the future is never known precisely, care plans need a degree of flexibility to be acceptable to all.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Ideally there should be a mechanism to ensure care plans are reviewed and up to date.</p>
</li><li>
<p> It was recognised that the initiation of such discussions is difficult and training would be helpful.</p>
</li><li>
<p> A small leaflet for parents explaining what care plans are is to be developed.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The development of recognisable care plans for child will help end of life care for children as well as supporting their families.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miller, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.75</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.75</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advanced care planning for children]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>229</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>230</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/230-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Establishing a sustainable children's palliative care network in Yorkshire and Humber]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/230-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A Children's Palliative Care Network was established in Yorkshire in 2005 after the appointment of a Consultant in Paediatric Palliative Medicine. A strategy group helped to share information and created on a local pathway of care. One difficulty was establishing links with the commissioning process. Another was that it was not certain that the network fulfilled the needs of the local providers or supported families effectively. A third was the change to Regional Boundaries so that four more PCT's and two other Children's Hospices were included in the network.</p>
<p>The possibility of funding from the DH grant to Children's Palliative Care allowed us to explore these issues.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A Doctor with a background in Palliative care was appointed to undertake a review of the network and contact GP's, nursing services and hospital services throughout the region.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome</st>
<p>There was overwhelming support for a network. This should be supportive and informative as well as organising and linking with commissioning. It is recognised that some formal administrative support is necessary for the success of the network. There needs to be rotation of members to enable succession planning.</p>
<p>An Action plan of achievable projects has been developed.</p>
<p>There need to be better links with other Children's networks, including the PICU, Neonatal and neurology networks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A strong network is an important aspect of ensuring equity of palliative care around the region. Implementing the recommendations of this report will help ensure its viability.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miller, M., Box, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.76</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.76</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Establishing a sustainable children's palliative care network in Yorkshire and Humber]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>230</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>230</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/230-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Whose job is it anyway? Meeting the spiritual needs of people at the end of life]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/230-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Spiritual care is a key element of palliative care. In the UK, NICE guidelines state that spiritual care should be offered as an integral part of care. Patients should have opportunities for their spiritual needs to be assessed and it is important for those assessing need to be highly attuned to the spiritual dimension of care. However, the results from the National Care of the Dying Audit (Round 2) in the UK show that this spiritual need is still not being met. Spiritual needs can be more urgent at the end of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to explore oncology nurses' understanding of spirituality, in anticipation of a greater understanding of this elusive area.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Using a qualitative cross-sectional design, inspired by a grounded theory approach, a non-probability purposive sample of seven nursing staff took part in a focus group and individual semi-structured interviews. The participants varied in age, grade and years of oncology experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The main findings showed the majority of nurses cited lack of time and not knowing what to say as significant barriers to giving spiritual care. The emotional impact on the nurse providing spiritual care was also identified as a burden, causing stress and feelings of inadequacy. Lack of education and training produced fear and anxiety. However, spiritual care was seen as a collective responsibility. The nurses wished to raise spiritual awareness and to deepen their own awareness in this important area.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Results suggest that despite the recognition of the importance of care in this area, nurses find difficulty in providing spiritual care to patients. Recommendations arising from the study include an education programme for nurses to increase the skills and confidence in undertaking spiritual assessment and enabling them to provide spiritual care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noble, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.212</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.212</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Nursing, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Whose job is it anyway? Meeting the spiritual needs of people at the end of life]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>230</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>230</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/230-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Memories, trajectories and bereavement]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/230-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Much attention has been given in recent years to the concept of illness trajectories and their potential use in the planning of services provided to those with life limiting illnesses. This study examines how trajectories are experienced by bereaved individuals and whether the memories retained by the bereaved or the experience of grief differ according to the disease trajectory of the deceased.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims and methods</st>
<p>The aim is to investigate whether the trajectory of dying influences the experience of grief or the memories held by the bereaved of the death and prior biography of the deceased.</p>
<p>One to one unstructured in depth interviews have been conducted with bereaved relatives between 3 months and 2 years after the death, followed by thematic analysis of the narratives produced.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Preliminary results</st>
<p>While it is possible to identify key stages in the dying trajectory as experienced by the bereaved, there is little uniformity to trajectories and key events are often not related to the medical status of the deceased.</p>
<p>Considerable sacrifices are often made by the bereaved in order to achieve a&rsquo;good death' as defined by the deceased and there appears to be a need to integrate the trajectory of dying with the memories of the deceased and their prior biography.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>There are a wide variety of experiences, with differences between the medical and the experienced trajectories of dying.</p>
<p>Research is ongoing, but it seems that the needs of the bereaved can be (willingly) overridden in the desire to provide an appropriate death and retain coherent memories of the deceased.</p>
<p>This may have future implications for the assessment of need and the provision of services and support of the bereaved both prior to and following the death.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mills, P., Griffiths, F., Munday, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.213</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.213</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Memories, trajectories and bereavement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>230</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>230</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/231-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breathing space: a flexible group programme for people with shortness of breath]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/231-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Breathlessness is a common symptom experienced by patients with advanced conditions which greatly impacts on wellbeing. The nature of patients' breathlessness often prevents them from being able to access support representing an unmet need for this population.</p>
<p>Breathing Space is a non-pharmacological support programme for breathless patients with an advanced medical condition.</p>
<p>The programme is a multi-disciplinary initiative with collaboration between the Hospice and local community services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To empower patients through:<l type="tab"><li><p> Understanding why they are breathless</p>
</li><li>
<p> Awareness of practical strategies to self manage breathlessness</p>
</li><li>
<p> Living life to the fullest alongside breathlessness</p>
</li><li>
<p> Providing support for patients and carers not able to access existing services.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A unique model was developed with a focus on maximising accessibility for the breathless patient. A series of stand alone modules encompass breathing control techniques, education and coping strategies to equip the patient with a set of skills to self manage their breathlessness even if they attend just once.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Breathing space</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> 9 drop in modules (Booth <I>et al</I>, 2006)</p>
</li><li>
<p> Carers welcome and encouraged to attend</p>
</li><li>
<p> Transport and lunch provided free of charge</p>
</li><li>
<p> Advocacy service available.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The results from the MYCaW outcome measure, attendance and user feedback will be collated and presented.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>While managing breathlessness is well established in palliative care, there is limited evidence to support the effectiveness of these interventions. Breathing Space offers a refreshing approach to this challenging symptom within a flexible group framework. Robust evaluation will contribute to the evidence base for non-pharmacological interventions for palliative breathlessness.</p>
<p>Through collaboration between hospice and community professionals, Breathing Space allows for sharing of practice and expertise.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Breathing Space supports patients with advanced breathlessness to improve their wellbeing.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart, D., Wosahlo, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.79</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.79</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Airway biology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breathing space: a flexible group programme for people with shortness of breath]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>231</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>231</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/231-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lean on us - a clinical kitchen]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/231-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Recognising the importance of food for patients is central to successfully delivering nutritional care. Our hospice sought to improve the patient experience by bringing kitchen staff into the clinical team. A project using Lean principles run by a volunteer industry expert and a Macmillan palliative dietician is underway to achieve this.</p>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Improve the patient food experience.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Integrate kitchen staff into the clinical team</p>
</li><li>
<p> Develop team working without altering reporting structures</p>
</li><li>
<p> Use the new team to improve nutritional care.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Utilise Lean (a widely used tool in industry and the care sector) to affect the changes.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Ward and kitchen staff discuss problems, seek solutions, implement them and take responsibility for their success.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Launch a full review of nutritional care to find and resolve issues using Lean principles.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The project is still underway but already we have successfully brought together the kitchen and nursing staff increasing their mutual understanding. The team is developing better systems and have Lean tools to help them continuously improve. This has resulted in more consistent delivery of nutritional care to patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We have not yet seen the full patient benefit but by bringing together the kitchen and nursing staff makes delivering nutritional care much simpler and more effective. Frustrations caused by lack of processes for communication between kitchen and ward staff led to inefficiencies and lower patient care. These are being overcome and the whole team is now more efficient and reactive to changing patient needs and is more efficient.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Recommendations</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Bringing nutrition into clinical care ensures this critical area is more fully delivered.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Allowing the whole team to develop and implement ideas ensures full staff buy in.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelby, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.80</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.80</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lean on us - a clinical kitchen]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>231</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>231</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/231-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lean on us - industrial efficiency in hospice care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/231-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>With a tightening economy and increasingly complex patient needs our hospice sought novel ways to increase efficiency. Turning to industry for inspiration we appointed a volunteer expert in process management to help develop and run hospice efficiency projects.</p>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Expert develops a clear methodology for hospices and leads the process</p>
</li><li>
<p> The expert trains staff in these principles</p>
</li><li>
<p> Improve patient safety and care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Increase staff and volunteer satisfaction</p>
</li><li>
<p> To be Staff led &ndash; Staff to identify problems, seek solutions, implement and take responsibility for them</p>
</li><li>
<p> Develop processes to continuously improve.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A volunteer industry expert in process management first developed Lean for use in hospices and then ran the Lean projects. Lean is a widely used tool in industry and the care sector but not previously used in hospices. Staff identified problems; solutions were trialled, adjusted and implemented using Lean tools. The expert ensured projects were focused, delivering a tangible benefit in reasonable time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> &pound;2500 reduction in purchasing of goods</p>
</li><li>
<p> Reduced handovers by over 5 h per week</p>
</li><li>
<p> Increased gift aid by &pound;10 000 per year</p>
</li><li>
<p> Higher staff and volunteer satisfaction as fully involved.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Reduced wasted time increasing time spent with patients.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Using an industry expert allowed the development of Lean for hospices and greatly speeded the implementations of solutions, helping us see processes in a fresh light. Staff trained in Lean now use their own initiative to solve problems using Lean principles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Recommendations</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Lean is successfully adaptable for hospices</p>
</li><li>
<p> Project solutions must be management encouraged but staff led</p>
</li><li>
<p> Use an expert to set up the process but staff must be trained to run the process long term</p>
</li><li>
<p> Significant efficiencies can be made while improving staff enthusiasm.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelby, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.81</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.81</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Hospice, Medical error/ patient safety]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lean on us - industrial efficiency in hospice care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>231</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>232</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/232-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Partnerships with young people in palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/232-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This Project is an attempt to diversify the hospice volunteer base using volunteers from ages 16&ndash;25 years in a specifically designed programme. Managed within the constraints of the National Curriculum the programme is an opportunity for volunteers interested in a Health and Social Care career to experience palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>The main aim of the project is to promote the principles of palliative care provision to a wider audience within the community. The programme is keen to encourage young people from a variety of diverse backgrounds to volunteer and to create new intergenerational links with patients and their families while enhancing a CV or improving job prospects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A number of new volunteer roles and a Volunteer Induction Programme were developed. Young volunteers were recruited through schools, colleges and various agencies working in the community. Placements have been facilitated using established volunteers as mentors and were monitored and supported on an ongoing basis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients have benefited enormously from the involvement of young people with opportunities to learn new skills from volunteers some with additional needs. The link with a younger generation has offered a forum for sharing stories and experiences.</p>
<p>Volunteers have been able to access places at university, gain employment and build their skill base citing their experience of palliative care in a hospice setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The project has been monitored throughout and evaluated on a yearly basis measuring personal outcomes and benefits to patients, staff and families. It has exceeded expectations in terms of interest in the scheme and commitment of volunteers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Young people from a wide variety of backgrounds have made a worthwhile contribution to the quality of life of patients. They will take their experiences and spread the hospice message in the future.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connelly, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.82</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.82</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Partnerships with young people in palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>232</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>232</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/232-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biometric access drug cabinets for personal controlled drugs in hospices]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/232-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The secure storage of controlled drugs (CDs) is defined in the Misuse of Drugs (Safe Custody) Regulations 1973. The 2007 Amendment specified its application to care homes which includes hospices. Compliant storage involves use of receptacles compliant with British Standard 2881.</p>
<p>The Home Office has confirmed that there are no exemptions to these safe custody storage requirements in care homes (personal communication 2011) although some approved local discretion is allowed in NHS trusts.</p>
<p>Spontaneous breakthrough cancer pain (BCP) is severe with a rapid onset and relatively short duration in most patients requiring prompt treatment with potent opioid analgesics. Treatment is with immediate release oral morphine or oxycodone or the newer faster acting oral transmucosal and nasal fentanyl preparations. Except oral morphine solution 10 mg/5 ml, these preparations must comply with safe custody CD regulations storage.</p>
<p>Healthcare professionals frequently cite treatment delay due to central retrieval of CDs, often distant from the patient, key locating, unlocking cupboards and completing administration audit. This results in patients in pain longer.</p>
<p>By employing self administration of medicines policies plus the development of a BS2881 compliant near-patient biometric storage cabinet, we have set out to empower patients in their own BCP treatment and reduce treatment delays. There is no legal requirement to witness CD self-administration.</p>
<p>Biometric cabinets are keyless with secure access by means of a thumbprint. IT cabinet link provides access authorisation and an audit trail. Lock-out times are programmable to govern frequency of access and repeat access. There are different cabinets for central ward or individual bed side location.</p>
<p>Pilot sites are being recruited for a trial and evaluation of the development. Organisationally agreed Standard Operating Procedures will govern the entire process in line with official requirements.</p>
<p>The outcomes of the pilot will be evaluated and published.</p>
<p>Development in association with Flynn Pharma.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Griffiths, M., Bunn, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.83</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.83</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Pain (palliative care), Pain (anaesthesia), Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biometric access drug cabinets for personal controlled drugs in hospices]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>232</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>232</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/232-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing e-learning in a hospice setting: benefits, challenges and outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/232-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To establish a virtual learning environment (Moodle) within Hospice</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>On line teaching and learning is making a significant impact on education. In recent years the use of e-learning has increased rapidly, enriching the teaching and learning experiences for many, due in part to the convenient and flexible nature of this delivery option. Following a successful outcome to a business case submitted to senior management, a project was undertaken within the hospice education department to establish a VLE using &lsquo;Moodle&rsquo;. It was hoped the outcome of this initiative would have a significant impact on the costs, resources and time taken to provide mandatory training and to maximise opportunities for continuous professional development. To achieve this the project team worked with key partners from each directorate to ensure the VLE met the needs of all its users.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The pilot for the e-learning project consisted of four mandatory training sessions, Vulnerable Adults and Child Protection, Infection Control, COSHH and Fire Safety, with 10 participants for each. Guidelines were developed and training was facilitated prior to undertaking the pilot. At the end of each session participants were asked to complete an on line evaluation and on completion of the pilot project, focus groups were held to capture their thoughts and experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Both challenges and rewards were part of the experience. Most of the challenges seemed to be a consequence of the lack of face-to-face interaction in the on line environment, lack of IT skills and feelings of isolation. The flexibility of e-learning offered a solution to many of the challenges inherent in providing education and training within the healthcare setting. Advantages included a learner-centric, easily accessible, cost effective and measurable means of providing staff training and educational opportunities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foster, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.84</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.84</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Child abuse, Child health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing e-learning in a hospice setting: benefits, challenges and outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>232</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>233</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/233-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Triage: An innovation in practice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/233-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>As the increase in demand for access to specialist palliative care services continues, methods to prioritise patients and carers with the greatest need becomes of increasing importance.</p>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>The aim of the project was to develop and implement a triage system for referrals into the Northern Ireland Hospice community specialist palliative care teams. One which would create a standardised process ensuring equity for patients irrespective of location, improve access to the service leading to prompt assessment based on patient need and overall improve the referral system to increase referrer satisfaction and the quality of patient care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The project consisted of two phases (1) a developmental phase and (2) an implementation and evaluation phase. During the developmental phase documentation design was required to capture essential information regarding patients and carers to aid identification of the patients prioity based on need. Using a triage assessment guide patients were scored using five categories- pain, symptoms, patient anxiety, psychosocial issues, and carer anxiety. A lower triage score indicated patients with less urgent needs are identified as priority three whereas a higher score indicates those patients whose needs are greater and identified as priority one.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The introduction of the triage system reduced the estimated waiting time from 1&ndash;7 to 1&ndash;5 working days. Patients identified as priority one are being assessed within two working days from triage with many being assessed within 24 h of receipt of referral in triage. Those who are identified as priority two are being assessed within three working days and the less urgent priority three patients are being assessed within five working days.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This triage system established a consistent, reproducible assessment process and provides a useful tool to improve the community teams efficiency delivering tangible benefits for patients and carers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flynn, F., Watson, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.85</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.85</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Pain (neurology), Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Triage: An innovation in practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>233</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/233-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Carers support]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/233-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In the last few years there has been a weath of research and literature identifying the importance of supporting Carers. The End of Life Care Strategy(2008) identified four key principles in supporting Carers.</p>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> 1) Carers need to be involved in decision making with the recognition they have their own needs</p>
</li><li>
<p> 2) Need information about the likely progress of the person's condition and information about services available</p>
</li><li>
<p> 3) Practical and emotional support both during the person's life and after bereavement</p>
</li><li>
<p> 4) Carers to have their own needs assessed and reviewed.</p>
</li></l></p>
<sec><st>Aims of the new service</st>
<p>To provide psychological support, information and advice to Carers; to provide an opportunity to share experiences with one another; to offer Complementary Therapies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>The Service</st>
<p>This takes place fortnightly on a Tuesday evening. A personal invitation and information leaflet about the service is sent to every Carer of the Day Hospice patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Venue</st>
<p>Day Hospice</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Resources</st>
<p>The service is run by two qualified nurses, two complementary therapists and a volunteer. The hospice receives a grant to fund this.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>How the need was identified</st>
<p>The need was identified through our patients and carers feedback via a survey conducted in 2009. We also wanted to implement this as part of what the &lsquo;End of Life Strategy means for patients and carers (2008) to support carers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Evaluation</st>
<p>Carers are requested to complete a questionnaire after 6 months. This has shown that the service is useful and provide valuable support to the carers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Proposals for the future</st>
<p>Developing a bereavement support group for carers, currently the carer is contacted 6 weeks after bereavement to be offered counselling &ndash; we have identified &lsquo;group&rsquo; bereavement support may be more beneficial as they have met together as carers and formed friendships, so meeting post bereavement could be further support to them.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Attiwell, T., Forster, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.86</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.86</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Carers support]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>233</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/233-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rainbow of ribbons (ROR)]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/233-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>ROR is a campaign which gives individuals a chance to dedicate a ribbon to someone who has added colour to their lives. The ribbon is then tied in the grounds of the Hospice with an open day for the public to view the ribbons.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To find a new income stream from an in-memory campaign.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Replace our Ray of Sunshine (ROS) balloon release event with something environmentally friendly</p>
</li><li>
<p> Encourage visitors to the Hospice</p>
</li><li>
<p> Organise an event with low staff time costs.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>All individuals that have made an in-memory donation in the last 3 years on our system are mailed, these people are invited to dedicate a ribbon to someone special. Once returned a ribbon is tied in the Hospice grounds, and name entered into the Ribbons book.</p>
<p>To gain extra publicity we ask a celebrity to tie the first ribbon to encourage supporters not known to the Hospice a chance to donate. ROR is aimed at in-memory donations but we stress that people can donate a ribbon to anyone who has added colour the their lives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> A significant income increase from the ROS event</p>
</li><li>
<p> Increased gift-aid on donations</p>
</li><li>
<p> More visitors to the Hospice</p>
</li><li>
<p> Less staff time on the day therefore less cost compared to ROS</p>
</li><li>
<p> Environmentally friendly</p>
</li><li>
<p> The dip in 2009 was from the introduction of our Midnight Walk which takes place in September by 2010 income increased again.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ROR is a fantastic alternative to our original event and is on a par with Light Up A Life for an in-memory event. The event captures and inspires people's imaginations, there is a wealth of opportunities for community groups to get involved and therefore makes this event a fantastic income stream for any Hospice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramsden, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.87</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.87</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rainbow of ribbons (ROR)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>234</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/234-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['I don't have to explain myself': using open groups to mobilise peer support in palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/234-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Model</st>
<p>Over the last 2 years members of a hospice social work, bereavement and chaplaincy service have piloted the use of semi-structured, facilitated open groups for day hospice patients, carers and bereavement service users. The approach is based on slow-open homogeneous group work model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Rationale</st>
<p>The approach developed initially as an operational response to the needs of a number of Carers' Group users who were inappropriately returning to the group after the death of the person they had cared for. Team members observed that those who returned were seeking a continuing connection with the hospice and staff that had provided a safe, &lsquo;holding&rsquo; environment. In addition, staff identified that any support group would need to be user-led, inclusive and flexible.</p>
<p>The evident success of this responsive model of semi-structured, facilitated open group work lent itself to other groups of varying size, and the model has been used with several initiatives, including weekly day hospice patient groups and monthly family bereavement groups, which attract 25&ndash;30 children and adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Feedback</st>
<p>Evaluations by participants of all the groups indicate that this approach is well attuned to the needs of palliative care services users. A further unanticipated benefit is that the model provides the opportunity for skill sharing within the multi-disciplinary team, including salaried staff and volunteers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Focus of presentation</st>
<p>This presentation, based on a rigorous service evaluation, outlines the development of the model as a response to user needs; it describes the principles on which the model has been established; and it critically appraises the strengths and weaknesses of the model through user feedback and staff reflections.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cullen, A., Nolan, S., Sandford, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.88</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.88</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['I don't have to explain myself': using open groups to mobilise peer support in palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>234</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/234-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A review of lymphoedema service provision in adult hospices in the UK and Ireland]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/234-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This study scoped lymphoedema services in adult hospices in the UK and Ireland. It was undertaken to benchmark and inform development of a local hospice lymphoedema service and was completed as part of an MSc in Advanced Practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The study investigated hospice demographics, lymphoedema services including budget provision, treatments used, staffing levels and qualifications. A secondary aim explored the use of Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD) with the palliative population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study was undertaken in November and December 2010. It adopted a quantitative approach using a postal questionnaire sent to 195 adult hospices, with in-patient units, in the UK and Ireland. This represented the whole population. Data were analysed using SPSS, with open-ended questions grouped and themed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A response rate of 65% revealed that 61.4% of respondents provided some level of lymphoedema service. Where services existed, 69.2% of hospices had staff employed solely to treat lymphoedema, 66.7% had ring-fenced budgets for lymphoedema care with 67.3% treating lymphoedema patients from outside the palliative population. Nurses and physiotherapists were the main professional groups involved in lymphoedema management.</p>
<p>MLD was employed as a treatment strategy for palliative patients in 75.6% of hospices. It was used holistically, often in an adapted form, with both physical and psychological benefit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Wide geographical variations exist with a cluster of fully developed services in the Midlands. It appears that different models of care are evolving in Wales and Northern Ireland in response to recent national guidance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There is potential inequity of service provision due to geographical variations. Further research is needed to plot the trend of hospice lymphoedema services, explore the impact of new models of care and give further consideration to the use of MLD with palliative patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birch, K., Knibb, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.89</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.89</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A review of lymphoedema service provision in adult hospices in the UK and Ireland]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>234</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/234-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementing triage in a busy hospice team]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/234-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The number of referrals to the Princess Alice Community Team continue to rise and, while it is apparent that the percentage of referrals for patients with non-malignant disease has not increased, the complexity of many referrals and the chronicity of cancer means that patients are referred for longer term care.</p>
<p>The Community Team has been responsive but the need to see a patient as urgently as the referrer perceives has placed undue stress on the Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNS). The referral process was uncontrolled.</p>
<p>We therefore employed a triage nurse to:<l type="tab"><li><p> Assess all referrals for appropriateness and urgency</p>
</li><li>
<p> Gather information about new patients before they are formally assessed</p>
</li><li>
<p> Respond quickly to urgent referrals</p>
</li><li>
<p> Speak to patients and carers, introduce the service and gain a sense of their needs</p>
</li><li>
<p> Assess non-urgent referrals, managing initial new patient needs through liaison with the primary care professionals</p>
</li><li>
<p> Assign patients to other departments, for example, therapists or day hospice if primary request is for this intervention</p>
</li><li>
<p> Keep a telephone only contact patient caseload</p>
</li><li>
<p> Record and audit new referrals and outcome of triage process</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The post has been a great success. An additional post has been made.</p>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> CNSs have not felt burdened by new referrals arriving with little information. The triage nurse can obtain copies of clinic letters, imaging reports discharge summaries etc.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Patients have felt welcomed and their cares listened to, an introduction to the service has been undertaken. They have been reassured.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Some patients have been &lsquo;referred back&rsquo; to the referrer or GP as not appropriate or, more commonly, have been held on the triage caseload until a time that requires a CNS visit.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Stats on patterns of referral, outcomes and &lsquo;refer backs&rsquo; will be provided as well as a discussion on future developments.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knighy, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.90</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.90</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementing triage in a busy hospice team]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>235</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/235-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative care social work - the leadership art of the chameleon]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/235-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Focus of the study</st>
<p>The study was informed by a literature review that identified similarities between the characteristic values and skills of social workers and some recent descriptions of close &lsquo;charismatic&rsquo; or &lsquo;transformational&rsquo; leadership, especially an account of the role of the leader as &lsquo;servant and partner&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methodology</st>
<p>The method adopted was to undertake a qualitative study of palliative care social work in a hospice in the south of England. Specialist palliative care social work was selected as a likely source of examples of social work practice &lsquo;at its best.&rsquo; The main fieldwork activities undertaken were semi-structured interviews with social workers and other members of the hospice's multi-disciplinary team, followed by a final workshop session.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>The study showed that social work practice in this setting was driven by an attitude of profound respect and sustained availability, which included a commitment to &lsquo;being with&rsquo; people in circumstances of intractable suffering. Specific mechanisms were identified through which social workers used professional skills such as adaptive communication, sensitive risk management, systemic thinking and improvisation, to enable service users to identify and express their priority needs, to mobilise their own distinctive abilities and strengths, and to optimise their use of informal support networks. By making these insights accessible to the multi-disciplinary team, social workers promoted the ability of service users to function as effective co-experts within the distributed leadership dynamic of the multi-disciplinary team.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Presentation</st>
<p>The presentation provides a detailed analysis of the processes through which social workers supported service users to discover and exercise their own capacity to be &lsquo;leaders in our own lives&rsquo;; and how this contributes a to a more practical understanding of what is involved in &lsquo;servant and partner&rsquo; leadership.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cullen, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.91</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.91</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative care social work - the leadership art of the chameleon]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>235</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>235</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/235-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The effectiveness of hypnotherapy in the treatment of anxiety in patients with cancer receiving palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/235-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In palliative care patients, anxiety is usually attributed to a reaction to diagnosis, treatment and its possible outcomes. Despite the support for hypnotherapy as a resource for the alleviation of psychological and emotional distress, there is a paucity of evidences to support the use of hypnotherapy for symptom relief.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Aims of this study were to assess the benefits of hypnotherapy in the management of anxiety in palliative care patients and to ascertain if hypnotherapy could affect other symptoms including depression and sleep disturbance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Participants received four sessions of hypnotherapy and completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, Verran and Snyder-Halpern Scale, and wrist actigraphy. Out of 21 patients recruited, eleven successfully completed the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After the second hypnotherapy session there was a statistically significant reduction in patient-reported anxiety (p=0.0066) and symptoms (p=0.0094), but not in depression (p=0.2910) or sleep disturbance (p=0.0868). After the fourth hypnotherapy session, there was a statistically significant reduction in patient-reported anxiety (p=0.0016), depression (p=0.0466), symptoms (p=0.0329) and sleep disturbance (p=0.0081). Actigraphy did not show a statistically significant improvement in sleep quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Hypnotherapy intervention appears to have a more immediate impact on anxiety and symptom severity whereas the improvement in depression and sleep quality is more slowly acquired. Actigraphy is a new tool to measure the quality of sleep. Its validation is still in progress and thus the sleep indicators chosen for this study are still a subject of debate. This could explain the result inconsistency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study suggests that hypnotherapy can contribute to reduction in anxiety in palliative care patients with the added benefit of improving sleep and severity of psychological and physical symptoms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plaskota, M., Lucas, C., Pizzoferro, K., Saini, T., Evans, R. E., Cook, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.92</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.92</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The effectiveness of hypnotherapy in the treatment of anxiety in patients with cancer receiving palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>235</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>235</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/235-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diversifying volunteer roles through the 'Family Friend' support service]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/235-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Serious illness brings stressful changes for patients and carers. Consultation with our carers identified a &lsquo;gap&rsquo; between medical and social care, indicating regular help within the home would sustain coping. Locally, reduced employment opportunities harnessed to Big Society thinking, means there is greater capacity for volunteers to bring their individual skills to support patients' families.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Introducing a new role whereby volunteers provide individualised carer support within the home.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Creating a robust and comprehensive training programme to support volunteer autonomy.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Research methods</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Informal interviews with carers.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Multi-disciplinary team's identification of carers' needs.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Qualitative research within hospice sector - indicating concern over health and safety issues.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Discussion and partnership with local Carer Liaison team.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> A successful proposal to local NHS Trust secured full funding for 1 year.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Dedicated co-ordinator input enabled the implementation of a robust training programme and supporting policies.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Development of a comprehensive risk assessment covering a broad range of supportive activities for volunteers to undertake.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Family Friend volunteers express increasing confidence through required monthly support group meetings.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>With the project active for a full year, it has been formally evaluated with encouraging feedback. Volunteers state that they value working with greater autonomy and express increased role satisfaction. Carers have identified Family Friend support as contributory towards greater coping and confidence. The service's success is attributed to our ability to identify a shortfall in carer support and our faith in skilled and trained volunteers to meet it.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The hospice believes that diversifying the volunteer role and providing enhanced training and supervision has increased satisfaction for volunteers, patients and families. This information could be used by hospices concerned about managing risk in home support volunteering.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberts, T., Thompson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.93</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.93</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diversifying volunteer roles through the 'Family Friend' support service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>235</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>236</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/236-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reflecting identities: using portraiture with people suffering from life threatening illnesses]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/236-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>"I look in the mirror and I say, &lsquo;who&rsquo;s that?' I don't really know who I am anymore! I have lost the person I thought I was." Patient, Prospect Hospice.</p>
<p>Arguably life threatening or chronic illness is not just an attack on the body, it is an attack on the embodied self, and identity, shattering the means by which a person experiences the world, and by which they also are experienced, contributing to a person's sense of powerlessness and &lsquo;loss of self&rsquo; (Charmaz, 1983). Therefore negatively affecting a person's ability to continue with their pre-illness activities, relationships and future plans and contributing to their &lsquo;total pain&rsquo;.</p>
<p>This paper will present case studies, drawn from the author's current PhD research, looking at how working collaboratively with an artist to co-design a portrait of themselves can help people suffering from life threatening or chronic illnesses to increase their self knowledge, build new identities and improve their &lsquo;individual creative capacity&rsquo;, to adapt to illness, therefore enabling the development of a more coherent sense of self and identity.</p>
<p>When attempting to understand the complex emotions and feelings contained within experiences of illness and loss of self, the use of portraiture as identity work, provides an intervention within which discursive knowledge and non-discursive knowledge can be reintegrated into a more coherent whole. Portraits often capture the &lsquo;essence&rsquo; or subjectivity of a person; the trace of a human presence left behind, and can enable people feeling detached from their body after invasive treatment, to recover a sense of autonomy over the bodily image they portray. This intervention also offers &lsquo;time,&rsquo; for the building of a collaborative relationship, at a time when relationship is hard to sustain, acknowledging that identity is built and sustained in relationship with others.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carr, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.94</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.94</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reflecting identities: using portraiture with people suffering from life threatening illnesses]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>236</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>236</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/236-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Made to fit': filling critical gaps with a hospice at home service]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/236-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Promoting the choice to die at home is central to UK policies and strategies. Nationally, various models of Hospice at Home service support this choice. Locally a service was developed to fill gaps in, and work together with, existing community services providing a bespoke Hospice at Home Service outreaching from the hospice hub.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study and stakeholder evaluation during a 1 year pilot study in the North West of England. Data (demographic and service intervention) was collected on 201 service recipients. 55 Healthcare Professionals; (General Practitioners, District Nurses, Community Specialist Palliative Care Nurses and Hospital Discharge Coordinator) participated in semi-structured interviews, focus groups and electronic open end questionnaires.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the first year, 201 received the service. 184 (92%) had cancer, 36% aged over 80 years. 57 (28%) lived alone. 181 (90%) recipients died. 73% (132) died at home (72% (120) with cancer), 6% (29) in the hospice, 12 (6.5%) care home, 1 (0.5%) in an ambulance on their way home, 7 (4%) hospital. 51 patients lived alone, 69% (35) died at home. Healthcare Professionals reported the impact of the different elements of the service (accompanied transfer home; multiprofessional (including doctors) crisis intervention team and a flexible sitting service) as being instrumental in helping patients to remain at home. The additional service supplements existing services, enables a speedier discharge home and supports carers to enable them to continue coping. It is of interest that in the second year a 73% home death rate has been maintained.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This novel bespoke service provides different elements of a Hospice at Home service, a tailor made package to meet individual and local area needs. This service appears to be having a major impact on place of death and is enabling patients to die in their place of choice</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldry, C., Jack, B., Groves, K., Gaunt, K., Sephton, J., Whelan, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.95</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.95</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Hospice, Psychotherapy, Adult intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Made to fit': filling critical gaps with a hospice at home service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>236</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>236</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/236-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Opening the electronic gate': raising spiritual awareness online]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/236-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Following an audit of spiritual and religious needs assessment and care provision across one cancer network area in the Northwest of England in 2006 it was clear that most health professionals working within specialist palliative care services felt that they lacked confidence, and would benefit from further education, in spiritual support. The cancer network supported the development of an interactive learning package for staff. &lsquo;Opening the Spiritual gate&rsquo;, to meet this expressed need.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To raise awareness of the spiritual and religious needs of patients and families</p>
<p>To help staff feel more confident in discussing and assessing them.</p>
<p>To provide this education in a format which is easily accessible and available to staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A joint project between a cancer network and a university technology department in the Northwest of England resulted in the conversion of the interactive awareness raising course of four sessions, originally delivered face to face (on one day or as a series), into an online course based on a constructivist learning format.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The iterative process involved in the conversion, a description of the online instance and the resulting course along with the qualitative analysis of the pilot are described. The results show that the online platform allowed participants to access the course at a time to suit themselves, from anywhere which had internet access and allowed them to learn at their own pace with time for reflection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Clearly e-learning does not suit everyone, but this project has shown that conversion of even a course reliant on group interaction is possible as long as sufficient material and activity, to meet all learning styles and preferences, is built in and the course is organised to allow small cohorts of people to form a learning community for its duration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Groves, K., Baldry, C., Smith, B., Sumner, K., Rimmer, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.96</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.96</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Opening the electronic gate': raising spiritual awareness online]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>236</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>236</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/237-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Opening the gate' - What's the difference?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/237-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>NICE Supportive and Palliative Care Improving Outcomes Guidance 2004 states clearly that health professionals should be in a position to assess the spiritual and religious needs of patients and either meet these needs or facilitate others to do so. A cancer network audit in 2006 showed that staff felt quite unprepared for this role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To see if a one day interactive course to raise awareness of spiritual and religious needs was effective in increasing staff confidence in this area of support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A spiritual support education programme was developed, which could be rolled out across the cancer network. The course was then offered to participants who chose to attend. Each participant was asked to complete a pre and post course questionnaire and course evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>159 participants attended the first 12 courses. 156 completed pre and post course questionnaires and 104 completed pre and post course confidence visual analogue scales which were compared. Many of the items suggest improvement from before the course to immediately afterwards, for example, pre course only 6% participants felt that they understood the nature of spiritual assessment &lsquo;very well&rsquo;, 36% &lsquo;quite well&rsquo;, 57% &lsquo;a little&rsquo; or &lsquo;not at all&rsquo;. After the course 57% participants scored the answer as &lsquo;very well&rsquo;, and 40% &lsquo;quite well&rsquo; with only 3% &lsquo;a little&rsquo;. Pre course the mean visual analogue score for confidence in assessing spiritual needs was 4.00 and afterwards 6.76 (where 0 was no confidence) and for assessing religious needs pre course 4.71 and post course 7.07.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>It appears that this course was successful in raising awareness and understanding of the nature of spiritual assessment and raises the confidence of participants in assessing spirituals needs. It remains to be seen whether the improvement is maintained once the participants return to the workplace.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Groves, K., Baldry, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.97</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.97</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Opening the gate' - What's the difference?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>237</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/237-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Music to soothe the soul]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/237-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>A talented composer and musician when admitted to a hospice many miles from home, missed the spiritual comfort provided by his own music collection stored on his ipod. Hospice CD &lsquo;s were not to his taste! When he died his partner was distressed and guilt ridden because she had not been able to access his music for him. She decided to raise money to provide ipods for all inpatients to use and enjoy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To provide each inpatient with an extra source of comfort and relaxation to suit their own individual taste.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Enough money was raised to buy 14 ipods and docking stations, 12 month supply of disposable headphones and a laptop for downloading the music.</p>
<p>An eclectic range of music of all genres was downloaded, including music composed and recorded by the patient and partner.</p>
<p>One auxiliary nurse volunteered to take responsibility for downloading music that had special meaning for individual patients as requested.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Comments from patients and families that have used the ipods are collected, also the types of music requested, comments- have indicated that the ipods provide a positive experience for patients and families with a wide range of musical tastes.</p>
<p>Staff comments were collected through an online survey.</p>
<p>Raising staff awareness of the benefits to patients of listening to music of their own individual choice rather than that selected by nursing staff from a central CD player, radio, piano or organ has prompted another auxiliary nurse to survey Day Therapy patients and find out what their music preferences are.</p>
<p>This poster describes the background to this service, comments from patients and families, and the results of the two surveys.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edmondson, K., Garlick, D., Wright, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.98</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.98</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Music to soothe the soul]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>237</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/237-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Working alone, in the safety zone!]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/237-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>A hospice at home service was set up 2 years ago to work alongside existing primary care services to fill identified gaps in care for patients nearing the end of life whose preferred place of care is home. Part of the service is a 24 h 7 day a week sitting service predominately delivered by trained healthcare assistants (HCA's) plus Bank RN and HCA's.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Staff follow the care plans of the district nurse who undertake all patient assessments. However the personal safety of the staff (lone workers) is the responsibility of the Hospice. A simple daily risk assessment to ensure continuous attention to safety was required.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A comprehensive risk assessment checklist which covers all aspects of safety and security is quickly completed by staff at each shift in the patient's home. Completed checklists are checked by the Co-ordinator after every shift with identified risks immediately addressed prior to the next staff member visiting that patient. This complements other staff safety measures: Lone Worker Policy, provision of personal tracker badges and mobile phones.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>For each of the 4000 patient sits provided since the service began, a checklist has been completed. Recurring themes identified excessive smoking, threatening dogs and &lsquo;difficult to find&rsquo; home addresses as key areas of risk. Expected risk, that is, insecure environment and difficult family dynamics, are hardly featured. A recent survey demonstrated that hospice at home staff felt robust systems were in place to minimise risks to their safety as lone workers in the community.</p>
<p>This poster describes the setting up of the risk assessment system, the checklist, results of the staff survey, and themes emerging from completed checklists.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birch, H., Edmondson, K., Stafford, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.99</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.99</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Smoking and tobacco, General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Health education, Health promotion, Smoking]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Working alone, in the safety zone!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>237</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/237-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A toolkit to support ventilated children and young people in children's hospices]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/237-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Children and young people who require Long Term Ventilation have heralded a new challenge for children's hospices across the UK. There has been growing recognition of the increasing numbers of those who are ventilator dependant and ongoing discussion about the appropriateness of their referral to children's hospice services. In addition there has been concern about the lack of consistency in caring for these children and young people and the need for further advice and guidance.</p>
<p>A significant and growing number of young people with long term palliative conditions are now receiving Long Term Ventilation as part of their palliative care trajectory. Many of these young people are now surviving into adult life and are likely to transition into adult hospice care as their disease progresses.</p>
<p>It is therefore likely that the issues, teaching pack, templates and information contained within the toolkit will also be highly relevant to adult hospice services.</p>
<p>The Children's Hospices UK (CHUK) Ventilation Toolkit has been funded through money from the first round DH &pound;30 Million for Children's Palliative Care. It has been created by a team of professionals from across the UK, led by Alison Cooke, Director of Care at Rainbows Hospice for Children and Young People in Leicestershire and David Widdas, Consultant Nurse for Children and Young People with Complex Health Needs in Coventry and Warwickshire.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cooke, A., Harris, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.100</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.100</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A toolkit to support ventilated children and young people in children's hospices]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>238</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/238-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['A foot in the door' - an introductory programme for patients with early stage motor neuron disease]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/238-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Patients with MND are usually referred to palliative care services late in their disease progression. Reasons for this appear to centre on patients being so distressed at the prospect of palliative care services involvement, that they delay referral for as long as possible. Having identified this as a problem, the hospice embarked on a joint venture with the Motor Neurone Disease Association. The premise of such joint working was to develop an outreach project for local patients with early stage MND. A grant was successfully secured from the DH (project 64 grant).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The aims of the project were to introduce this cohort of patients/carers to palliative care services at a much earlier stage in their illness and to decrease levels of distress/anxiety associated with a referral. It was also to give the opportunity for patients/carers to meet others in a similar situation and to provide them with information about common problems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Two programmes were devised, each of 10 sessions, with a different theme per session. Each programme was devised to support 10 new patients/carers, with sessions taking place in the day hospice (hence the title &lsquo;a foot in the door&rsquo;).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>During the first and final sessions of each programme, patients/carers were asked to anonymously score a series of statements concerning their confidence in (and experience in accessing) care, their concerns for the future and feelings about hospice services. Results show that a positive change in all domains occurred.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This outreach project had a positive impact on MND patients/carers. The project format can be replicated by other palliative care providers.</p>
<p>A DVD further detailing the project is being made in order to help other palliative care providers develop similar work.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stananought, N., Greene, M., Sutherland, J., Midgley, C., Asiam, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.101</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.101</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Motor neurone disease, Neuromuscular disease, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['A foot in the door' - an introductory programme for patients with early stage motor neuron disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>238</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>238</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/238-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Better together carers programme]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/238-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Carers of palliative patients will often put their needs second to those for whom they are caring, but we know that their needs are great. Rapid changes in patients' condition and the emotional and relationship changes this brings are hard, requiring constant adaptation and emotional resilience.</p>
<p>The &lsquo;Better Together Carers Programme&rsquo; was developed in consultation with carers, as a structured weekly programme which aims to bring support and education to carers.</p>
<p>Each 2 h session is facilitated by two qualified, experienced Palliative Care Social Workers, to promote a safe and stable environment for carers to build relationships with each other and the facilitators.</p>
<p>The sessions offered:<l type="tab"><li><p> An informal &lsquo;check in&rsquo; and &lsquo;check out&rsquo; from all</p>
</li><li>
<p> Guest speakers to give carers practical advice/signposting, and also tools to aid them in their caring role</p>
</li><li>
<p> Simple complementary therapy massage and relaxation techniques</p>
</li><li>
<p> Nutritional advice &ndash; for patient and carer</p>
</li><li>
<p> Creative therapies</p>
</li><li>
<p> Managing difficult and crisis situations</p>
</li><li>
<p> Self care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Social time with refreshments, allowing space to build relationships and peer support networks.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The final session took the form of a candlelit supper for both carer and cared for person; this provided a positive ending to the course and also affirmed the value of the carer's role.</p>
<p>Evaluation showed carers had gained greater confidence and skills in their caring role, had improved knowledge of resources available and had set up informal &lsquo;buddy&rsquo; systems, which had improved their psychological well being. They valued the balance between information and emotionally charged discussion/sharing and social time/checking in and out, which gave opportunity and permission to be light hearted and sociable. For them it made a real difference in being able to cope and we feel this to be an important model to share.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawless, S., Townshend, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.102</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.102</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Complementary medicine, Physiotherapy, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Better together carers programme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>238</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>238</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/238-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical and marketing teams working in partnership to improve access to services]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/238-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Improving access to palliative care has been high on the agenda for hospices for a number of years. Barriers to access are many and varied. Much work has been done to identify and reduce them but still evidence suggests that barriers remain.</p>
<p>In 2008 our marketing team carried out a consultation exercise to gain a better understanding of the challenges the hospice faced in improving access for our locality. Over 400 local people, service users and providers were asked their views. A range of methods were used including key stakeholder focus groups and one-to-one interviews with the general public.</p>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>demonstrated significant barriers to accessing our services. Many were not aware of services on offer nor who could use them; and there was a real need for literature that clearly communicates the work of the hospice and the range of services it provides.</p>
<p>The consultation exercise resulted in a rebranding in 2009. Since then our marketing and clinical teams have worked in partnership to raise the profile of the hospice and reduce barriers to access through a range of promotional and marketing initiatives. We have produced a range of service information leaflets and clinical literature and have successfully developed networks and collaborative working relationships with colleagues in non-cancer specialities.</p>
<p>Some 3 years on we are beginning to see the results of our partnership working. We have achieved more by combining our marketing and clinical expertise than we could have achieved singularly. Statistics suggest that we are beginning to improve access to people not previously accessing our services well. While there is still a long way to go we can see that our joint working and enhanced information giving is raising the profile of our hospice and the services it provides, paving the way for more patients to access them.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sutherland, J., Frame, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.103</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.103</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical and marketing teams working in partnership to improve access to services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>238</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>239</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/239-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Extending services and enhancing systems: working together to manage increased numbers of referrals]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/239-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Improving access to palliative care for all patients with life limiting illness has resulted in a significant increase in referrals to specialist palliative care services. Expanding services to keep pace with increasing demand and ensure that all referred patients have access to specialist advice and clinical assessment in a rapid and timely manner has posed a challenge and placed greater emphasis on the importance of prioritising referrals according to need.</p>
<p>Extending services to cope with growing numbers of referrals has required innovative thinking and enhanced systems. Our service has seen a 24% increase in referrals over the last 3 years. As referrals have risen in number it has become increasingly necessary to look at referrals management and review our processing of them. Our key aim being to ensure that referrals are prioritised according to need and dealt with as quickly as possible.</p>
<p>We reviewed our management of referrals in a number of stages using a variety of methods including process mapping, audit and focus group work. Methods were chosen based on the size, needs and processes within each department. The review exposed a number of gaps, bottlenecks and inequities.</p>
<p>Finding solutions to our bottlenecks and to better manage referrals has been well supported by our use a standardised holistic assessment tool across the organisation. We use an organisationally adapted version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule -STAS (Higginson, 1989) to structure our assessment of patients against 30 factors across all required domains.</p>
<p>We are now working creatively to expand our use of the tool to prioritise referrals and manage departmental waiting lists. Evaluation has shown that using STAS within clinical departments has enabled us to enhance our method of processing and prioritising referrals according to need and ensure that we are better placed to meet demand.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sutherland, J., Midgley, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.104</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.104</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Extending services and enhancing systems: working together to manage increased numbers of referrals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>239</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/239-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fireworks and feelings - reaching out creatively to young people through the storm of bereavement]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/239-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Children and young people are often shielded from the initial trauma of a terminal diagnosis of a parent or significant care giver, resulting in less time to come to terms with an imminent death than older family members. This may affect their bereavement. Fireworks and Feelings children's project encourages early, open support among peers.</p>
<p>To enable a sharing of experiences between bereaved young people, using choice and free expression, young people were invited to attend an art day.</p>
<p>They used creative arts as a medium for expression within a safe environment with clear expectations and a choice of artistic materials for all levels of ability; we had a shared, social lunch in the middle of the day, and they each chose one art work from the day for display in an exhibition of their works, later, continuing the sharing theme. The day was faciliated by volunteers with support and encouragement to express, with minimal instruction. The follow-up exhibition and celebration is for all participants and their families.</p>
<p>A positive experience of peer sharing which extended beyond the day with many of the young people swapping email address and phone numbers. Keeping in touch, sharing, understanding individual grief feelings and developing peer support enhanced well being and psychological health. The Exhibition reunited this group, and shared with family and friends the celebration of the special person and their achievement of expression.</p>
<p>Involvement in the arts assists in the development of mental and social health and well-being. It allows freedom of expression and playfulness. Young people create social and psychological bonds and relationships extending beyond the art day. There is exploration and expression of deeper levels, without words, providing an alternative method for those who may struggle to put words to the feelings around such an important and significant loss.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gardner, D., Sullivan, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.105</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.105</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fireworks and feelings - reaching out creatively to young people through the storm of bereavement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>239</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/239-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How effective is our telephone triage service at providing specialist palliative care?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/239-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In 2006, we enhanced our specialist telephone triage service to keep pace with the increasing demands of providing accessible specialist palliative care to all with life limiting illness. Early statistical analysis revealed that the service was invaluable in coping with increased demand but were telephone triage patients receiving an effective service? In August 2010, a retrospective caseload analysis was undertaken to establish this point.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To determine the ability of the telephone triage service to reduce patient STAS (Support Team Assessment Schedule, Higginson 1993) scores or to refer on appropriately. To compare results with the community team's ability to reduce patient STAS scores. To highlight trends in types of care provided for patients managed by the telephone triage service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The telephone triage service uses an adapted version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule tool to assess patients. 50 randomly chosen patients were recruited, with at least one problem scoring STAS 3 or above at triage first contact telephone assessment. Analysis of STAS scores was undertaken at subsequent contacts, along with referral patterns and time lapses between contacts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At the second telephone triage contact, the number of problems scoring STAS 3 or above had reduced by 60%. A third telephone contact reduced the number scoring STAS 3 or above even further. Outcome scores for the community team were very similar.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The very nature of palliative care means that as initial STAS scores are reduced, new and often more complex problems develop. However, results clearly demonstrate that our telephone triage service is effective in palliating symptoms. Introducing telephone triage into our service has successfully reduced our waiting lists by providing a flexible, responsive service appropriate to need. We are now able to confidently evidence the effectiveness of this service in terms of providing high quality specialist palliative care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stananought, N., Sutherland, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.106</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.106</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How effective is our telephone triage service at providing specialist palliative care?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>239</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/240-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving end of life care on the front line]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/240-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Emergency Care Practitioners (ECPs) are often asked to respond to 999 calls from patients that are dying at home. If relatives caring for loved ones at the end of life suddenly become afraid or anxious, or if new symptoms develop, then the ECPs are often called and have to make quick assessments and judgements about the situation. This project is about enhancing the skills and knowledge of the ECPs to enable them in decision making, and recognising some of the complications and complexities at the end of life. The ultimate aim is to keep patients in their preferred place of care.</p>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To provide 5 days of training to ECPs from the East of England on end of life care, including what palliative care emergencies are, what the end of life care tools are and an introduction to the drugs available in emergency boxes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Between November 2010 and March 2011 we welcomed over 30 ECPs on five study days on end of life care. Each delegate attended the same programme and had the opportunity to discuss the most difficult aspects of attending palliative care patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Our initial feedback from the evaluation forms was encouraging. For many delegates, this was the first training that they had received on end of life care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The initial feedback received and the links that we have now built with the ambulance service, are certainly encouraging. We have been given some anecdotal evidence from the local end of life care facilitator who has already seen positive results in practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>By September, we will have further feedback from the ECPs as we plan to wait until they have had an opportunity to put what they have learned into practice before assessing how this training has influenced practice and what needs to develop further.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scates, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.107</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.107</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Interventional cardiology, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving end of life care on the front line]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>240</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>240</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/240-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sharing innovation to improve access to specialist palliative care: making a triage DVD training tool]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/240-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The widening access agenda and quest to extend palliative care services to all has resulted in a significant increase in referrals for community support. Working innovatively to create flexible, accessible and responsive services to meet increasing demand, our hospice developed an enhanced telephone triage service.</p>
<p>The telephone triage service plays an invaluable role in providing high quality specialist palliative care advice to increasing numbers of patients in the community. Audit of the clinical activity of both our community palliative care and triage services demonstrates that the addition of the telephone triage service has enabled us to deliver quality specialist support to 67% more patients in the community.</p>
<p>The success of the service and the outcomes it achieves has attracted much interest from other providers of palliative care. Requests for information, and for facilitated visits to observe the service in action were so frequent that we decided to produce a DVD and accompanying training package to support others in establishing a similar service.</p>
<p>A project group was formed to guide DVD production from the writing of the bid, to the marketing of the final product. The remit of the group was to work collaboratively with partners and service users to produce an informative learning tool to support others in setting up a telephone triage service.</p>
<p>The production of the DVD and accompanying training package brought many positives, from the benefits of partnership working to demonstrate the value of services were clearly evident, to the role of education in sharing ideas and best practice. Most importantly though, the project gave us hope that in developing an educational tool to facilitate the sharing of our innovative service design, we would be playing a part &ndash; albeit a small one &ndash; in advancing rapid access to palliative care and improving outcomes for patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burrows, L., Toland, L., Godfrey, S., Sen, M., Miah, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.108</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.108</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sharing innovation to improve access to specialist palliative care: making a triage DVD training tool]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>240</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>240</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/240-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Supporting the setting up of a tertiary palliative care service. Positive reflections on reaching out]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/240-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In 2008 a new Consultant in Internal Medicine was appointed to a busy cancer centre in Pakistan. He found himself providing predominantly palliative care, alongside a skilled but small palliative nurse team. This was recognised. He was made Consultant Lead for Palliative Care, and supported to enrol on a UK Diploma course and to do a 6 week locum registrar spell in a UK hospice for professional development.</p>
<p>The relationships forged led him to request continued connecting with the hospice Consultant, through SKYPE, for 1 h per month once back in Pakistan. This to allow reflection on complex cases, as he had no Consultant to do this with.</p>
<p>We started connecting 2 years ago, achieving 10 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 1 h sessions annually, discussing 1&ndash;2 cases each time. The palliative care team in Pakistan contributed, and an educationalist/Nurse joined the Consultant in the UK hospice.</p>
<p>For Pakistan it has been so useful to discuss difficult symptom control and emotional challenges with an experienced physician, with, over time, real gains in patient, family and staff support. Sharing of working policies has been invaluable. Our connection has helped powerful lobbying to politicians regarding controlled drugs access, and armoury for Consultant and team to pursue initiatives like the Liverpool Care Pathway.</p>
<p>For the UK we have seen our Pakistan colleagues overcoming huge practical challenges, particularly in support of people at home, often involving intense family support in care delivery. We have been impressed by the willingness of the wider hospital team to work together, quickly, towards best comfort care. These things have enhanced our UK care: we are more including of families, and understand more those we care for with international connections. We recommend this as an affordable, manageable and rewarding way to support international palliative care development and build educational and supportive links across services.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Midgley, C., Hafeez, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.109</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.109</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Supporting the setting up of a tertiary palliative care service. Positive reflections on reaching out]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>240</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>240</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/240-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Online education toolkit for members of National Association of Palliative Care Educators]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/240-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To harness the vast range of knowledge, experience and skills implicit within the membership of NAPCE and publish on the website in an acceptable format so that a toolkit of education resources is created, available to NAPCE members only as a direct benefit for membership. The toolkit will be of interest to anyone working in palliative and end of life care. Teaching and learning is at the heart of many roles and colleagues would benefit from being able to access resources from other educators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Support and disseminate good practice</p>
</li><li>
<p> Provide readily available and resources in a wide range of topical areas in a &lsquo;one stop shop&rsquo;.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Promote ideas for future development of education resources</p>
</li><li>
<p> All resources will be regularly updated and checked for accuracy and</p>
</li><li>
<p> copyright acknowledged where appropriate.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>How</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> The structure of the toolkit and the core information will be published on the new NAPCE website in Spring 2011</p>
</li><li>
<p> NAPCE members requested to submit their resources electronically to a published email address</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>These are then reviewed for:<l type="tab"><li><p> Content &ndash; Suitability for publication</p>
</li><li>
<p> Classification &ndash; what category the material goes into</p>
</li><li>
<p> Clarity &ndash; scanned documents, pictures and other material</p>
</li><li>
<p> Copyright &ndash; all authors are acknowledged appropriately.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Resources are then uploaded to the identified website sections in an agreed format.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Why do?</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> It fits with the constitution of NAPCE</p>
</li><li>
<p> And also with the End of Life Care Strategy, -promotion of quality education for health and social care professionals</p>
</li><li>
<p> No such resource exists either online or in hard copy</p>
</li><li>
<p> No other organisation has taken this on nor would they be in a position to do so</p>
</li><li>
<p> It promotes NAPCE's name and provides a tangible benefit for the membership</p>
</li><li>
<p> The details of the content and process, as well as the benefits would be expanded if submission successful.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Becker, B., Moss, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.110</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.110</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Online education toolkit for members of National Association of Palliative Care Educators]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>240</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>241</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/241-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The gold standards framework: an audit of local practice from a hospice perspective]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/241-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Gold Standards Framework (GSF), developed in 2000, has been an important resource designed to strengthen the organisation and quality of primary palliative care. The aim of this audit was to gather information (from the hospice perspective) about the extent to which local General Practices were meeting GSF standards. Structured interviews (based on a PCT questionnaire that had been designed to examine the levels to which practices had implemented the GSF) were undertaken with the hospice community clinical nurse specialists. Results showed that locally the majority of practices appeared to have adopted basic GSF standards, with 53 of 58 practices holding palliative care meetings and 45 practices maintaining a palliative care register. However a third of practices held GSF meetings less frequently than every 6 weeks. Given the frailty and changeability of the palliative care population, meetings held this infrequently are less likely to be effective for monitoring patients or planning care.</p>
<p>Adoption of higher levels of GSF was more variable. The majority of practices needed prompting to send clinical information to the out of hours service did not use significant event analysis of palliative care patients as a learning tool and recorded data inconsistently on the palliative care register.</p>
<p>Key challenges identified from this study are:<l type="ord"><li><p>Maintaining the current level of engagement with palliative care</p>
</li><li>
<p>Ensuring that palliative care meetings and palliative care registers are used effectively to enhance the quality of patient care</p>
</li><li>
<p>Engaging GP practices who are not using the GSF</p>
</li><li>
<p>Supporting those who are using the basic level of progress to intermediate and advanced levels</p>
</li><li>
<p>Promoting the GSF for a wider range of non-cancer conditions.</p>
</li></l></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palmer, Z., Brayden, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.111</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.111</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The gold standards framework: an audit of local practice from a hospice perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>241</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/241-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Co-ordinating care: a clinicians tale]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/241-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Palliative Care Co-ordination Centre (PCCC) was first devised as part of the Marie Curie Cancer Care &lsquo;Delivering Choice Programme&rsquo; acting as an administrative centre to book packages of care on a first come, first served basis of care for palliative care patients. In August 2010 clinical leads were introduced into the centre.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To provide a central point of communication for clinicians, working with the referring clinicians to ensure that care is prioritised and co-ordinated. To ensure patients receive the most appropriate level of care. To support patient choice at the end of life by facilitating discharge from hospital and reducing inappropriate admissions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Introduction of clinical staff with palliative care and community nursing experience. Extended working; opening at weekends.</p>
<p>Access to SystmOne patient records, the palliative care template and introduction of a county-wide prioritisation tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Clear discussion regarding patient needs and priority between referring clinician and PCCC team &ndash; care based on need not first come, first served.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Patients' care packages are routinely prioritised resulting in complex patients receiving the majority of their care from dedicated palliative care providers.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Reallocation of care to support unmet need / reprioritisation of patient care supporting patient and their family and carers at home.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The introduction of clinical staff has enabled patient need and priority to be matched to the appropriate care and has released resources and reduced unmet need.</p>
<p>This has supported both speedier discharge from and prevented unnecessary admission to hospital.</p>
<p>It has also highlighted issues with the current systems and barrier to the effective use of Continuing Healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The introduction of clincians has been a positive investment; the issues highlighted need to be addressed to further improve outcomes for patients and their families.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnson, B., Smith, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.112</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.112</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Co-ordinating care: a clinicians tale]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>241</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/241-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The responsive needs tool - unlocking communication of end of life care needs]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/241-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Lincolnshire Home Deaths Project Group brought together organisations from across the county to develop new ways of working that were patient focused and to ensure that end of life services dovetailed. This included a night care pilot which identified the need for an assessment and communication tool endorsed by the health and social care community to enable the needs led prioritisation of resource in end of life care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To enable clear, accurate and effective communication of need across organisations to support the allocation and re-allocation of available night care resources for patients at the end of life based on their clinical need.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The &lsquo;responsive need&rsquo; tool was devised by members of the group using the work of two organisations, St Barnabas Lincolnshire Hospice and Marie Curie Cancer Care and the Gold Standards Framework prognostic indicators as a resource.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> The tool has become the common &lsquo;currency&rsquo; of Communication County wide and is incorporated into SystmOne palliative care template.</p>
</li><li>
<p> It has enabled the provision of End of life care according to need, and stopped unmet need for complex patients in the pilot area.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Given clinicians confidence that the care will be there when the patient needs it; releasing care and supporting new ways of working.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This tool has given us a shared language and supported the clinician in their decision making. It has enabled us to achieve the aim of allocating care on the basis of need and urgency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The responsive needs tool has supported choice at end of life for patients and would be of interest to both those commissioning and providing end of life care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnson, B., Ball, B., Bake, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.113</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.113</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The responsive needs tool - unlocking communication of end of life care needs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>242</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/242-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An innovative model for delivering end of life care education]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/242-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The care of patients at the end of life and their families has had an increasing profile since the publication of the End of Life Care Strategy. A central aspect of the strategy is education to improve the delivery of care at the end of life. Studies have shown that inadequate education and training results in suboptimal care at the end of life. Moreover, there are increasing difficulties in releasing staff to attend educational events. Therefore, we need to provide a more adaptable and responsive approach to the delivery of end of life care education.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>The model</st>
<p>The End of Life Care Education and Training Model provides a flexible approach to supporting structured learning with an opportunity for reflective practice, enhancing professional development. Within this model we can tailor individual, departmental or organisational development plans that build competent practice to enhance end of life care. The model uses Bloom's taxonomy &ndash; a classification of the different levels of learning, advancing from basic levels of knowledge and application through to higher levels of analysis and evaluation &ndash; as the central building block for all professional development. Each aspect of the model provides a variety of options to support learning, for example: study days, seminars and courses considering different elements of a single topic; taking what has been learned and applying it to practical aspects of patient care; enabling staff to develop an outline of a skill set that supports competent practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The intention of the model is to provide a framework for all healthcare practitioners working with people at the end of their lives to promote lifelong learning and therefore enhance patient care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lansdell, J., Mahoney, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.114</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.114</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An innovative model for delivering end of life care education]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>242</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/242-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Professional user views of a specialist palliative care service]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/242-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The End of Life Care Strategy promotes a whole systems approach to care at the end of life. Following significant service changes (including an increase in catchment area due to the closure of another local provider, and the introduction of 7/7 working and &lsquo;hands-on&rsquo; nursing care in the community) since 2009 St Catherine's Hospice conducted a professional users' survey in early 2011.</p>
<p>19 health and social care professionals (a mix of doctors (mostly GPs), nurses, therapists and a spiritual leader) who work across the geographical area where St Catherine's Hospice provide specialist palliative care participated in semi-structured telephone interviews.</p>
<p>The survey focused on the working relationship with the hospice, and any suggestions for improvement or future development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Participants viewed the overall experience of working with the hospice as positive and the service was considered to enhance care for people at the end of their lives both through direct care provided and by supporting other professionals.</p>
<p>Participants cited the introduction of hands-on nursing as particularly positive &ndash; enabling increased shared care between NHS providers and the hospice. Communication with and response from the hospice were generally reported to be good particularly in urgent situations although some areas for improvement were noted. Those who had worked with the previous provider, reported that they had been anxious about St Catherine's taking over the service but their anxieties had not been realised.</p>
<p>There was no apparent dissimilarity between the views of different professional groups and all seemed to be very willing to extend and build on opportunities for working together. There were varying on views on the role of the hospice &ndash; and of other professionals &ndash; in providing more &lsquo;generalist&rsquo; end of life care.</p>
<p>Many recommendations emerged for further exploration and action and these will be highlighted in the presentation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senior Management Team,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.115</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.115</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Professional user views of a specialist palliative care service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>242</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/242-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tissue viability in the hospice setting: joint working and blended learning to develop and demonstrate competent practice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/242-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Evidence suggests that 35% of people with life-limiting disease develop wounds towards the end of life and managing wounds in this population can be complex and challenging. The majority of the wounds, 50%, are decubitus ulcers and this is attributed to the "failure" of the skin and underlying tissues in the last days of life; acknowledgement of this enables better wound management, leading to enhanced patient comfort. A knowledge questionnaire on wound care demonstrated poor understanding among many of the nurses.</p>
<p>Recently adopted hospice palliative care competencies require that healthcare assistants (HCAs) have knowledge of basic wound care and the ability to carry out simple dressings, while registered nurses (RNs) must be able to assess and manage complex wounds. With a team of over 50 nurses, our goal is to ensure consistency in the standard of wound care as well as a measure of that consistency.</p>
<p>A 2-h classroom session has been delivered by hospice link nurses and a lecturer practitioner and includes tissue viability theory, holistic impact of wounds in palliative care and wound management, including aseptic non-touch technique (ANTT). All members of the inpatient unit nursing team are expected to attend a session as part of a compulsory training day. Additionally, they must complete a workbook on wound management that includes competency assessment, undertaken by an RN trained in teaching and assessing. In addition, all RNs must complete an online wound care management course and provide verification of the results.</p>
<p>The outcome of this project is that wound management in the hospice is delivered to a consistent evidence-based standard, demonstrated by competent practice. Further, the link nurses have been supported to source appropriate evidence and share their tissue viability knowledge with the wider team.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Myers, L., Hailer, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.116</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.116</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Dermatology, End of life decisions (ethics), Trauma]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tissue viability in the hospice setting: joint working and blended learning to develop and demonstrate competent practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>243</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/243-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowing yourself - understanding others - how an awareness of personality type can help with change]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/243-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>As an intrinsic part of a major service redesign and implementation project, members of St Catherine's Community Team undertook a planned development programme focusing on personal and team development.</p>
<p>The driver for this development programme was the implementation of a new Community Care Model to meet the Department of Health's End of Care Strategy that a &lsquo;palliative care service should be available 24 h a day and 7 days a week in order to make it possible for those who want to die at home to do so.&rsquo;</p>
<p>The context of the development programme was, therefore, one of high change and challenge that saw 31 new members of staff joining the Community Nursing Teams including 2 new community team leaders.</p>
<p>Part of this programme was a workshop on the theory of Personality Type. Extensive research over many years into personality types has shown that there are many personality related indicators that can impact upon the way in which people interact with one another.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This presentation will highlight how the programme impacted on the teams who undertook the programme. By focusing on personality type with a reference to change we were able to explore why some people find change exhilarating while others find it overwhelming. These differences may be the cause of misunderstanding and miscommunication.</p>
<p>Some of the things participants fed back were:-<l type="tab"><li><p> &lsquo;appreciating individual approaches to the same situation, neither being right or wrong &ndash; learning from each other&rsquo;,</p>
</li><li>
<p> &lsquo;Looking at personality type and how I modify approach to patients, also how I try to support colleagues&rsquo;.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Attention in the presentation will be given to how the programme impacted on the teams who undertook the programme and the impact this in turn had on patient care during a time of change.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pearce, S., Nash, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.117</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.117</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowing yourself - understanding others - how an awareness of personality type can help with change]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>243</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>243</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/243-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing competencies for end of life care in care homes]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/243-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>End of life care is provided by generalists, often in the care home sector. Inadequate training and support can lead to suboptimal end of life care in care homes. The development of measureable competencies supported by education is essential to improve care delivery. This relies on working together as hospice competencies are not directly transferrable to the care home environment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To improve end of life care in care homes in a sustainable way through the development of core competencies supported by education.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>This pilot project involved hospice staff working collaboratively with four local care homes. Year one developed a competency framework within each individual home informed by focus groups. Year two analysed competencies and identified key issues for inclusion in a 5-day training programme, tailored to address these issues in the broader context of palliative care. 15 care home staff attended the course, feeding back learning in their respective homes. The impact of the course on end of life care delivery was considered. Year three incorporated the competencies into existing staff appraisal systems. Senior care home staff were trained to assess competence, promoting sustainability of the competency work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Engaging care home staff in the development of competencies and identification of educational need is essential to ensure a tailored, relevant programme. Effective measurement of competence is achieved through appropriate assessment linked to staff appraisal. Opportunities for sharing learning throughout the process should be identified at an early stage.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion and conclusions</st>
<p>Developing a competency framework demonstrates an ongoing commitment to the development of staff and ultimately care home services, when supported by a tailored package of education. Working together is fundamental to success.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lansdell, J., Mahoney, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.118</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.118</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing competencies for end of life care in care homes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>243</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>243</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/243-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Day hospice audit to establish a baseline prior to piloting the preferred priorities for care document]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/243-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In 2010 a baseline audit was conducted to establish what proportion of Day Hospice patients were aware of, had discussed or had completed a Preferred Priorities for Care document (PPC). The audit was done in preparation for piloting the PPC, as a tool for advance care planning. The aim of the audit and piloting of the document was that all Day Hospice patients within the last 12 months of life (GSF) would have been offered a PPC document as part of their advance care planning. This was in support of the recommendations from the End of Life Care Strategy 2008.</p>
<p>The methodology used was a retrospective audit of the patient notes documentation and Day Hospice patient interviews to identify relevant information with regard to advance care planning. The audit was repeated 3 months later.</p>
<p>The audits clearly demonstrated that Day Hospice does provide an excellent opportunity to discuss and give information about advance care planning. However, the audit demonstrates that most patients appear to prefer to complete a PPC document at home with assistance from either a family member or Healthcare professional. It also identified that staff needed to have an increased familiarity with the document and in initiating the conversations.</p>
<p>Practice change resulting from the audit relate to a need to continue to raising staff and patient awareness every 3 months and to develop a patient information leaflet outlining choices for advance care planning, which is to be inserted in all new patient notes to promote discussion.</p>
<p>All these changes have now been implemented. Empirical evidence suggests that the audit process has been highly successful in facilitating change through team involvement. A repeat audit will be conducted to provide hard evidence of that success.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas, D., John, K., Skinner, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.119</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.119</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Day hospice audit to establish a baseline prior to piloting the preferred priorities for care document]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>243</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>244</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/244-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[To explore the factors influencing whether GPs sign the DNAR order as part of the LCP]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/244-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>End of life care is currently a government and national priority. The Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP) is an evidence-based multiprofessional document which aims to optimise end of life care. In May 2006 the LCP was introduced into a primary care locality within a London PCT. An audit carried out on the first 20 patients to be placed on the LCP noted that the &lsquo;do not attempt resuscitation&rsquo; (DNAR) order had been signed by their general practitioner (GP) in only seven out of the 20 patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims and objectives</st>
<p>To explore the factors influencing whether GPs sign the DNAR order of the LCP. To explore what helps or hinders GPs to sign DNAR orders and to propose actions facilitating completion of such orders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews with seven GPs and four nurses were carried out between April 2008 and September 2008. Grounded theory analysis was used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The LCP is a nurse led process in the primary care setting that was studied. Facilitatory factors for obtaining a signed DNAR order were a multiprofessional approach to the care of palliative care patients, a good working relationship between GP and district nurse, the GP and district nurse working from the same premises and district nurse confidence in commencing the LCP. Inhibitory factors were initial GP ambivalence towards the LCP, ambivalence of the district nurse to completing the LCP process, difficulties with accessing a GP to sign the DNAR order and commencing the LCP out of hours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The study demonstrates the importance of a co-ordinated multi-professional approach to achieve a signed DNAR order of the LCP. It highlights the need for the on-going education of healthcare professionals on end of life issues.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chew, R., Forbes, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.120</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.120</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[To explore the factors influencing whether GPs sign the DNAR order as part of the LCP]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>244</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>244</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/244-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Privacy and dignity in a hospice environment - the development of a clinical audit]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/244-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Privacy and dignity are important aspects of the patient experience and are central to the philosophy of hospice care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To provide evidence of the standards of privacy and dignity afforded to patients in the wards and Day Hospice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A review of key currents documents and an internet search of appropriate audits was undertaken to identify best practice for delivering care that provides privacy and dignity. Following discussion with clinical colleagues and with patients and carers in their respective forums, the following standards were developed.</p>
<p>All patients admitted to the In-Patient Unit and Day Hospice should receive care that<l type="tab"><li><p> Respects their personal space</p>
</li><li>
<p> Respects their modesty</p>
</li><li>
<p> Protects their self- respect</p>
</li><li>
<p> Maintains good communication</p>
</li><li>
<p> Protects their confidentiality.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Questionnaires, using Likert scales, were devised for patients and different groups of staff &ndash; medical, nursing, allied health professionals, spiritual care team, catering and housekeeping teams. These were given to 30 patients and 130 members of the multi-disciplinary team.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The response rates were 91% (patients) and 78% (staff). Evaluation of the questionnaires showed that 70% of patients rated their satisfaction with privacy and dignity as "excellent" with the remaining 30% rating it "very good". For the most part, the ratings of staff and patients were in agreement and indicated achievement of the expected standard.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Despite the good results there were some areas of concern identified. These included ensuring that hand washing was available for dependent patients prior to meals, closer monitoring of visitor numbers, avoiding interruptions to staff when with patients and maintaining privacy during conversations with staff. Important discussion took place within the teams regarding issues raised in the audit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>An action plan was formulated to address the concerns and re-audit is planned for later in the year.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerry, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.121</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.121</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Confidentiality, Legal and forensic medicine, Human rights]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Privacy and dignity in a hospice environment - the development of a clinical audit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>244</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>244</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/244-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A new model for breaking bad news to people with learning disabilities]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/244-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Current models for breaking bad news are inadequate in meeting the needs of people with learning disabilities (LD). People with LD are often not told of a life-limiting diagnosis. The task of breaking bad news is often left to carers who are poorly prepared and supported to cope with this. Healthcare professionals don't know how to communicate adequately with people with LD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>A new model for breaking bad news to people with LD</st>
<p>The model was developed following a focus group/interview study involving 96 participants, including people with LD, family carers, LD professionals and healthcare professionals (see related abstract for oral presentation). The findings were combined with the literature. A preliminary model was developed; 60 stakeholders gave feedback on this, including a wide range of family carers, professionals and academics. The preliminary model was modified following this feedback.</p>
<p>The poster will present the model in a visual format. The model has four components.</p>
<p><l type="ord"><li><p>BUILDING A FOUNDATION OF KNOWLEDGE is central to the model. Gradually and over time, the person with learning disabilities builds his/her understanding of the way his/her situation is changing because of the bad news. The people around him/her help with this, by giving small, singular chunks of information that make sense to the person. This does not have to done by talking: much of the information will be understood through experience.</p>
<p>The other three components must be considered throughout:</p>
</li><li>
<p>CAPACITY AND UNDERSTANDING, taking account of the Mental Capacity Act</p>
</li><li>
<p>PEOPLE INVOLVED, including family, partners, friends, paid carers and professionals</p>
</li><li>
<p>SUPPORT NEEDED by everyone involved, including information, emotional, social, practical and spiritual support.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The model now needs to be tested in practice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tuffrey-Wijne, I., Giatras, N., Butler, G., Cresswell, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.122</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.122</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics), Child and adolescent psychiatry, Disability]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A new model for breaking bad news to people with learning disabilities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>244</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>245</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/245-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Supporting people with learning disabilities who are affected by a relative or friend with cancer]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/245-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Around 2.5% of the population have LD. 55% of people with LD live with parents; significant numbers have become carers of elderly parents. Around 15% of people with LD live in residential care homes, often with an ageing population of peers. Most people with LD will therefore be affected by cancer of family or friends at some point in their lives. Their support needs are insufficiently understood.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To explore the experiences and support needs of adults with LD who have a relative or friend with cancer</p>
</li><li>
<p> To make recommendations for practice.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>22 people with LD took part in focus groups and face-to-face interviews. All participants had experience of having a close relative/friend with cancer. The groups were co-facilitated by two co-researchers with LD; each group met four times, using a range of methodologies (including story-telling, role play and Nominal Group Technique) to extract participants' experiences and views. Data were analysed using content analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Being protected from information (as many participants were) negatively affected their coping.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Participants worried about their relative/friend's illness and the impact on both the patient and on themselves; but had not shared their worries or questions with others.</p>
</li><li>
<p> The greatest need was for "someone to talk to"; this need was not met by either families or professionals.</p>
</li><li>
<p> There was a lack of understanding about cancer itself, and a lack of access to cancer information; participants wanted such information.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The needs of people with LD who are a relative/friend of someone with cancer are often overlooked. This group does not ask for support, and therefore pro-active support is needed from cancer- and palliative care professionals as well as from LD professionals. This includes emotional support and the provision of accessible information about cancer.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giatras, N., Tuffrey-Wijne, I., Butler, G., Cresswell, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.123</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.123</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics), Hospice, Child and adolescent psychiatry, Disability]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Supporting people with learning disabilities who are affected by a relative or friend with cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>245</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/245-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determining & prioritising key factors of care needs for patients & carers known to Hospice@Home]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/245-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Ensuring optimal use of resources can be very challenging for Hospice at Home services frequently faced with deciding which patient and carer situations at the very end of life are most in need. An approach was taken combining clinical practice experience with knowledge of existing scoring aids to formulate a tool to assist in prioritising service allocation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Enable timely and efficient allocation of care visits to those determined as most in need</p>
<p>Provide a transparent audit trail of resource and service allocation for commissioners when service faced with multiple demands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Consideration was given to the common factors known to affect patients/carers at the very end of life and developing a scoring system which aligned closely with the Gold Standards Framework Prognostic Indicator Guidance model. The tool was refined during a 6 month pilot change and as service changes ensued.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Clinical staff found the tool to work well in practice and supported clinical decision making. They found using the tool particularly useful when demand for service exceeded resource availability and enabled the clinical team and commissioners to be assured patients/carers most in need received priority.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The outcomes of the project concurred with the aims. We have found a way of prioritising our service allocation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The concept of developing the Prioritisation Tool for Hospice at Home care was driven by needing to establish a system and process which would optimise service allocation relevant to the local population needs. Many factors influence the needs of each patient and carer scenario and these were all included in the tool. Using the tool across two collaborative providers has been positive and enhanced partnership working and service provision. Other providers may find this tool useful.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greene, K., Evans, T., Doherty, T., Tongue, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.124</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.124</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determining & prioritising key factors of care needs for patients & carers known to Hospice@Home]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>245</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/245-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Support for coping with issues of loss in schools (SCILS)]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/245-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Working in collaboration with local schools we developed an innovative programme of support to enable staff and pupils to cope with issues around loss and bereavement.</p>
<p>We aimed to use our experience of working with young people living with grief to enable schools to be better prepared for a death in the school community and to normalise death and dying.</p>
<p>Working in partnership with the schools we proposed a four tier triangle of service provision. The services were funded jointly by community money earmarked for &lsquo;vulnerable children&rsquo; and investment from the hospice.</p>
<p>We provided opportunities for staff, pupils and parents to learn about loss as part of life, through a varied programme of workshops and assemblies.</p>
<p>We delivered training and resources which introduced staff to the bereavement pathway for schools, this equipped staff to respond appropriately to pupils experiencing loss and explored how they could offer proactive bereavement support.</p>
<p>A strategy for identifying vulnerable children who required specialist bereavement support when grief became more complex was developed.</p>
<p>The project was rolled out to 37 schools, representing over 11 000 pupils. Evaluations were received from 316 staff. 100% understood the aims of the bereavement pathway and felt they had the necessary skills to follow the policy, 80% felt they might require support to work with a bereaved pupil but all understood how to access this. 10 young people were referred for further bereavement support.</p>
<p>This programme, not only met the needs which schools had identified but widened access to hospice care and facilitated community engagement opening a dialogue around death and dying in line with the government's EOLC strategy.</p>
<p>We have been approached by numerous schools who were not part of the original project, and are currently working with them to develop a plan to roll the project throughout our catchment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Archer, N., Walker, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.125</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.125</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Support for coping with issues of loss in schools (SCILS)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>246</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/246-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pooling resources to drive quality; the evolution of the National Audit Tools Group (NATG)]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/246-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Recognising the importance of audit in improving quality and the limited resources available in many hospices, Help the Hospices formed the NATG in 2004.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To pool expertise from across the hospice movement to develop a core range of hospice-specific audit tools that are available to all.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Initial membership comprised a small multi-professional team of hospice personnel with a specific interest in audit and quality. To establish an effective methodology, they started by developing audit tools relating to core areas of treatment and care.</p>
<p>As more professionals volunteered to participate, the group expanded and subgroups were formed to develop new ranges of tools. The active involvement of experts from particular fields was sought to inform and strengthen this process.</p>
<p>To encourage their widespread use, tools are designed to be user-friendly, and are trialled rigorously before release. Feedback from trials and subsequent usage has led to progressive improvements in design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Representatives from 29 hospices are members of the group/subgroups, and over 50 hospices have trialled new tools. 22 audit tools have been released to date and downloads from Help the Hospices website have averaged over 400 per month.</p>
<p>Evolution of the group is ongoing with seven subgroups currently developing another 13 audit tools, including new families of tools for community services and children's hospices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The commitment of a broad range of personnel from different backgrounds, supported by their local hospices, has been key to the successful evolution of the NATG.</p>
<p>Membership of subgroups or attendance at workshops provides excellent training opportunities.</p>
<p>Possible future projects include e-learning, benchmarking and validation of locally-generated tools.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The NATG has developed a highly effective model for pooling expertise to drive quality improvement by facilitating audit.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodgers, C., Flanagan, P., Thompson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.126</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.126</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pooling resources to drive quality; the evolution of the National Audit Tools Group (NATG)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>246</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>246</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/246-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA["LIP" the Living with illness programme]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/246-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>For around 3 years, St Helena Hospice's LIP programme has brought together patients and carers to an informative, supportive forum. The rolling programme of semi-structured sessions is intended to enhance awareness and choice by raising important issues early on in the &lsquo;journey&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The programme has three main aims: to provide information on key &lsquo;Quality of Life&rsquo; issues for those coping with illness; to facilitate discussion and understanding between patients and carers around these key issues; and to provide support from professionals and other group members. These aims tie in well with NICE guidance for psychosocial support, and with the NCPC's initiative "Dying Matters".</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The 6-week LIP is built around themes identified from previous groups at the Hospice (eg, Families and Feelings, Intimacy and Sexuality, Lifestyle and Coping, and Planning for Future Care). Each 90-min session is run by a relevant professional, with a co-ordinator/facilitator present throughout for continuity. The theme for each session is used as a starting-point for information and discussion. What follows is a more open, free-flowing group time, where issues important to the group members are shared and reflected upon. An anonymous feedback questionnaire is sent to participants after the programme's end.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results and discussion</st>
<p>Group numbers vary from 8 to 20+, with a good mixture of patients and carers. The weekly themes certainly provide a stimulus for group discussions in-session. There is an important added effect of more conversations taking place at home, within couples and families.</p>
<p>Feedback has prompted some changes, but in general the programme is well-received by participants. Anecdotal evidence suggests that patients and carers have benefited from the early input of appropriate material, as this enhances their informed decision-making later on in areas such as Preferred Priorities of Care, funeral planning, etc.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Argent, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.127</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.127</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA["LIP" the Living with illness programme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>246</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>246</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/246-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Demonstrate the quality of your bereavement service]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/246-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Two bereavement audit tools have been written to enable Hospices to collect crucial data to evidence high quality service provision based on national standards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To enable hospices to evidence the standard of their bereavement work using high quality audit tools.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Two audit tools were written by a collaborative group of bereavement service co-ordinators and audit professionals from different hospices. The tools fit together but look at different aspects of bereavement: the first enables audit of a bereavement service and the second audits bereavement care. It was an interesting challenge/struggle for the authors to understand these two different aspects of bereavement service provision when developing the tools.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Within current health policy the tools enable hospices to look at how they might provide evidence to address the QIPP agenda and to be commissioned for services.</p>
<p>In anticipation of GP commissioners looking for good value, having audit data available provides tangible evidence of the work of the bereavement service.</p>
<p>Although bereavement care is acknowledged within Palliative care definitions it is only recently that the Department Of Health have recognised this &ndash; publication of &lsquo;When A Patient Dies&rsquo; and the End Of Life Care Strategy, but there are no quality markers published within initial EOLC quality markers.</p>
<p>The tools are referenced to all available National standards, have been piloted and reviewed assuring users of their quality. This quality has been recognised by other, non-hospice, organisations who have expressed interest in using the tools, as the key principles are transferrable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We encourage Hospices who do not have a bereavement service, as well as those who do, to use the tools. It will enable them to demonstrate the quality of their bereavement service and may assist them in identifying gaps and plan service developments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jane, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.128</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.128</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Demonstrate the quality of your bereavement service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>246</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>247</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/247-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing and implementing a model for multi-disciplinary clinical supervision for staff within a hospice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/247-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The development of a model for the internal provision of clinical supervision in which both the supervisors (staff at AFC band 7 and above) and supervisees are well informed staff members of the multi disciplinary team, who use this process of reflection to understand and enhance their work while being supported by the management structure of the organisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To introduce a sustainable model that works successfully across multi disciplinary boundaries.</p>
<p>To provide supervisors with training and &lsquo;supervision of their supervision&rsquo; support groups facilitated by an external person/s.</p>
<p>To promote the importance of clinical supervision as a staff support mechanism from the top of the management structure down.</p>
<p>To assist staff to recognise the value for themselves personally and professionally of both accessing clinical supervision, AND providing it for others.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results and discussion (pro's and cons)</st>
<p>Pros; Supervisors are widely reporting enjoyment and satisfaction from their new roles, and the diversity it brings to their work, as well as the useful insights it gives to the working roles of their supervisees which may previously have been misunderstood.</p>
<p>Supervisees are reporting the benefits of having &lsquo;quality time&rsquo; for reflection in their busy working schedule.</p>
<p>And cons; Take - up from trained nurses was slow due to inherent misunderstandings/mistrust of the purpose of supervision. There were also fears regarding the maintenance of confidentiality in a small organisation, and difficulty dividing supervisors into peer support groups avoiding conflicting professional relationships. Sustainability relies in part on the management of the systems and register of supervisors and constant encouragement and promotion regarding the role and importance of &lsquo;supervision&rsquo; for individuals, teams and the wellbeing of our patients</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Other hospices may be interested in implementing a similar model and can learn from our experience.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watmore-Eve, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.129</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.129</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Confidentiality, Legal and forensic medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing and implementing a model for multi-disciplinary clinical supervision for staff within a hospice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>247</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>247</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/247-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Needs of the Charedi Orthodox Jewish Community in Stamford Hill for specialist palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/247-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Charedi Community located in Stamford Hill represent the third largest concentration of strictly Orthodox Jews in the world, with a total population of over 18 000 members. To date the Charedi Community have had little involvement with Hospice. Little is known about the needs of Charedi people with advanced, progressive illness and what factors underpin their lack of uptake of specialist palliative care services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A multi-dimensional Needs Assessment was undertaken, drawing upon Epidemiological, Corporate and Comparative approaches to consider the need as widely as possible. This included a number of focus groups within the Charedi community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There is a small but significant need for specialist palliative care services within the Charedi community (up to 44 new patient referrals per year), with specific areas of need identified in relation to specialist nursing and medical input, therapies rehabilitation and bereavement support. These needs would be best met by the Community Palliative Care Team to fulfil the Charedi community's preference to receive care at home.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The Charedi community have a need for greater awareness of palliative care services and support available to patients with advanced disease. Charedi care providers are receptive to engage with joint working and training opportunities offered by the Hospice.</p>
<p>Additionally, there is a need for Hospices to better understand core Jewish values to ensure culturally sensitive and appropriate care for Jewish patients. Attention to the great value Judaism places on life, implications for provision and withdrawal of interventions and methods of conveying information to allow for maintenance of hope is needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The Charedi Jewish community in Stamford Hill have an unmet need for Specialist Palliative care. The community is open to work in closer partnership with the Hospice to support Charedi patients with advanced, progressive illness.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennings, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.130</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.130</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Needs of the Charedi Orthodox Jewish Community in Stamford Hill for specialist palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>247</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>247</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/247-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A redesign of hospice social care services]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/247-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The social care resource of the typical hospice has developed in steps over a period of time, as and when funding becomes available. As a consequence of this the structures of different teams and departments are varied and often follow no clear model. This was the situation faced at the hospice of this study team, who identified that this carried with it certain risks, both to service users and to the organisation. In order to address those risks, changes were needed, and a stronger structure developed for the social care provision of the hospice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To carry out a systematic review and design of a hospice social care service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A focus group carried out a literature search and multidisciplinary planning sessions. A business plan was developed and put into place.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Social care was restructured around a 4 level model. The qualified social worker to social care assistant ratio was altered to reflect the need for clear assessment and delegation, in order thet the risks were addressed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Hospice social care brings with it a high level of risk. This risk can be lessened if the appropriate structure is in place ensuring that patient's needs are at the focus of care. The 4 level model provides a structure to rebuild the service, and a clarity to ensure that the appropriate competencies, knowledge and skills are in place to deliver care safely.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The use of the 4 level model to restructure and redesign the hospice's social care service ensured a patient needs focus. The structure also allowed clear identification of the knowledge and skills needed across the health and social care workforce for safe patient assessment and care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas, M., Widlake, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.131</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.131</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A redesign of hospice social care services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>247</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>248</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/248-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Promoting end of life care across care homes: the role of the specialist palliative care nurse]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/248-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In 2008 the NAO undertook a retrospective study for all deaths in Sheffield during October 2007. 58% of these deaths occurred in hospital despite 40% having no medical reason to be there. 19% of deaths occurred in care homes.</p>
<p>Using the Gold Standard diagnostic framework 42% died from frailty, 30% from cancer, 20% chronic disease and 8% were unexpected. The study supported that best practice palliative care, advanced care planning and preferred priorities of care had not been identified or achieved.</p>
<p>The benefits of having a clinical specialist palliative care nurse specifically designated to care homes is to understand the working environment of individual care homes. The role enhances the delivery of palliative care education that reflects the requirements of individual homes and promotes informal education through discussing face to face findings following the specialist assessment of individual residents.</p>
<p>The poster provides evidence for encouraging best practice palliative care for all care home residents, irrespective of diagnosis. It identifies changing patterns in referral and discharges from specialist palliative care services as robust supportive end of life care plans are instigated through discussion with individual residents, their families, care home staff and the wider MDT team. Proposed future developments will also be identified.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bird, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.132</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.132</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Promoting end of life care across care homes: the role of the specialist palliative care nurse]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>248</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/248-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of an integrated model for earlier identification and provision of palliative care for patients of all diagnoses]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/248-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The National EOLC Strategy seeks to improve access to high quality palliation for patients of all diagnoses. One such group for which this is difficult is advanced heart failure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To use auspices of NHS Improvement to develop cross organisational integrated pathway for advanced heart failure (HF) to ensure better end of life care (EOL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A. Retrospective audit identified 26 deceased patients known to the heart failure nurses. The majority had no EOL discussions or specialist palliative care and died in hospital. Most had multiple admissions with average length of stay of 31 days in last year of life.</p>
<p>B. Key stakeholders were brought together to develop a new pathway and tools which facilitated patient choice, addressed symptom management and anticipatory care planning.</p>
<p>C. Tools include<l type="tab"><li><p> Tools for HF nurses</p>
</li><li>
<p> Patient and Carer assessment tool</p>
</li><li>
<p> &lsquo;Trigger Tool&rsquo; to identify patients who are a &lsquo;cause for concern&rsquo;. Creates gateway for appropriate joint management between cardiology and SPC services.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Aide memoire for action following identification of patients</p>
</li><li>
<p> Home management folder.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>D. Key features of pathway<l type="tab"><li><p> Monthly advanced heart failure forum. Enables hospital /community heart failure nurses to discuss patients identified as &lsquo;cause for concern&rsquo; with cardiologists and agree CLEAR action plan. Palliative care input to forum is planned</p>
</li><li>
<p> Bi-monthly meetings between palliative care nurses and community HF nurses</p>
</li><li>
<p> Joint Heart Failure clinic.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>E. Re-audit revealed<l type="tab"><li><p> Increased use of specialist palliative care services, for example, homecare, day care, hospice and hospice at home</p>
</li><li>
<p> Increased EoL discussions with HF nurses</p>
</li><li>
<p> Increase in documented preferred place of care and achievement of death in PPC</p>
</li><li>
<p> Reduced hospital deaths.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Cross organisational work can develop shared pathways, tools and training which improve care for end stage HF and improve skills of HF nurses.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniels, C., Dancy, M., Donovan, T., Alimo, A., Smith, D., Berry, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.133</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.133</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Drugs: cardiovascular system, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of an integrated model for earlier identification and provision of palliative care for patients of all diagnoses]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>248</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/248-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Doing different things not doing things differently]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/248-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Major business change is a complex process requiring clear direction, planning, specialist resources and above all a massive commitment from the organisation. Our Hospice has achieved such transformational change.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To do different things and to not just do the same things differently.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>For hospices to prevail in the 21st century the original vision of the hospice movement needs aligning with the changes in health/social care communities. Methods were the development of strategic aims, a business plan and sharing this with managers. Time was given to understand this plan, its key messages (integration, innovation, workforce development, excellence, education and support, initiative and public involvement). Buy in was achieved.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="ord"><li><p>An electronic patient record system that allows better integration across sites Unexpected results were a new culture overnight of computer literacy, transparency of who thinks what about a patient and improved role profile as all staff can see what each are doing</p>
</li><li>
<p>Increased bed occupancy</p>
</li><li>
<p>Redesign of social care services which were based on a new model of care</p>
</li><li>
<p>Clinical Governance requirements were followed up via a Falls Audit completed by the Physiotherapist. The recommendations achieved new approaches in falls management, that is, intentional rounding and purchase and use of sensor alarms for patients at high risk of falls.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Time was given to develop trust in the process of business planning via a newly formed management level. The question is how this is now embedded further across all staff groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We are on a track rather than just moving. True engagement with the public and with our users is needed. Priorities are quality in our services; to assert this when the competition approaches and to build on the trust placed in us by the local community.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boosey, C., Mowle-Clarke, K., Stewart, A., Veli, A., Widlake, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.134</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.134</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Doing different things not doing things differently]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>249</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/249-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Supporting end of life care delivery: an inclusive approach]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/249-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In line with the Hospice movement's key role in promoting the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) across health and social care settings, quarterly link nurse meetings involving care home, community nursing and hospital staff were developed by the Hospice LCP team in 2008. These have been successful in engaging staff from a range of settings, with a current membership of approximately 60.</p>
<p>The benefits of the LCP are well documented. However, the challenges of delivering any aspect of end of life (EOL) care requiring co-operation across social and healthcare settings has also been recognised, particularly in terms of the support needed by care home staff. Assumptions can be made about the impact of the group in meeting these support needs. However, as the Hospice education team look to deliver a more comprehensive EOL programme and to expand the remit of the group to reflect this, understanding representatives' perceptions of the group and its future direction seemed important to ensure ongoing engagement.</p>
<p>Questionnaires, using Likert scale and open questions to capture participants' perspectives on different aspects of the group's activities and on expanding the its remit, were e mailed to all representatives.</p>
<p>A response rate of 63% (n=38) was achieved. Responses are still being analysed but there is emerging evidence of the value placed, particularly by care home staff, on the opportunity to meet with those working in other settings and of perceived educational needs if taking on a wider EOL role.</p>
<p>Both the ongoing commitment of the group and the early results of this survey support previous work highlighting the importance of strong cross sector relationships (3,4).</p>
<p>When finalised, the Hospice education team will feedback to the link and EOL steering groups to inform the future direction of the link group and education initiatives.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawley, L., Talbot, J., Franke, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.135</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.135</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Supporting end of life care delivery: an inclusive approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>249</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>249</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/249-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Doing the right thing at the right time]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/249-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In order to improve the care of patients and their families when the patient is dying it is helpful to implement the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying. It therefore is necessary to identified them in a timely fashion. Previous studies suggest that physicians tend to be overly optimistic when attempting to predict survival.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify factors that clinicians consider when a patient is dying,</p>
<p>enabling implementation of the Liverpool Care Pathway.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A phenomenological study using semi-structured interviews (n = five nurses and five doctors) conducted on a hospice inpatient unit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There was a prominent theme of anxiety about getting the timing of diagnosing dying right and how the dying patient and their families would cope if this were the case. The factors that influenced the clinician's decision to implement the LCP were: support for decision making, understanding the patient's journey and concern that the care given is appropriate. It also appears that most of the factors that help are the mirror images of those that hinder the process of deciding when the pathway should be implemented. The theme remains the same but the meaning as to whether it helps the clinician to decide if a patient is dying or not changes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>All clinicians interviewed for this study had concerns about increasing the patient's or carers' distress if LCP implementation was mistimed; there is a risk that clinicians are avoiding difficult conversations with family members and there may be a lack of understanding around the reasons for it's use. Specific communications training may help to prepare clinicians for this role.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dee, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.136</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.136</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Doing the right thing at the right time]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>249</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>249</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/249-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Therapeutic hand massage: empowering carers to care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/249-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Evidence suggests there is a great need to support social care home staff in End of Life Care (EOL). Staff may lack confidence in their ability to provide EOL care. The Local Hospice has worked with social care homes, running a successful Liverpool Care Pathway training programme. Participants identified other EOL training needs and the focus was directed to the use of therapeutic hand massage, a recognised effective method of providing pain control and comfort for those clients with dementia and distress.</p>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To enable care home staff to use therapeutic touch and non-pharmacological management for end of life symptoms and aid communication with the residents in their care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methodology</st>
<p>20 care homes and 23 staff were involved in the pilot. Places were free and staff were recruited at NVQ 3 level and above. The programme was delivered in two workshops, held a month apart. The first day focused on practical hand massage techniques, the theory of therapeutic touch and some guidance on how to run workshops in their own care setting. The second workshop required a case study presentation demonstrating what impact hand massage has had on EOL clients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Evaluation</st>
<p>Participant evaluation of this &lsquo;train the trainer&rsquo; approach demonstrated an increased confidence to provide the training to other care home staff and positive effects on the residents were also reported, in terms of reduced agitation and more engagement in communication. There were also reported benefits for relatives of the residents, as they could perform hand massage when visiting. This made them feel that they were &lsquo;doing something&rsquo; for their loved ones.</p>
<p>Due to the positive outcome of the pilot programme this workshop is now offered as a regular educational programme. The next programme is already oversubscribed and there is a growing demand for the programme.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Talbot, J., Evans, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.137</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.137</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), Pain (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Memory disorders (psychiatry), Complementary medicine, Physiotherapy, Sports and exercise medicine, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Therapeutic hand massage: empowering carers to care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>249</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>249</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/249-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospice neighbours]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/249-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Everyone needs good neighbours &ndash; developing a Hospice Neighbours Scheme</p>
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This is an innovative, volunteer-led scheme created to help people (and their families) who are coming to the end of their lives with practical everyday tasks as well as support in the last days of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To provide practical support to these people, this can include collecting prescriptions, taking the dog for a walk or simply providing companionship.</p>
<p>Hospice Neighbours will enable support earlier in diagnosis, no matter what this is. It will be more proactive way of working, relieving pressure in the earlier stages of illness which will help make later stages easier. This will ease demands on both hospice services and other care agencies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>employed so far have been to:<l type="tab"><li><p> Recruit, train and develop teams of neighbours</p>
</li><li>
<p> Recruit a volunteer coordinator responsible for assessing patient's needs and matching them to a neighbour.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Record all neighbour activity and obtain feedback from the service users.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results so far</st>
<p>Some requests for someone to help with:</p>
<p>Walking, to help regain their confidence post chemotherapy treatment. A Hospice Neighbour now visits fortnightly to provide companionship.</p>
<p>Gardening, which due to illness he is no longer able to tend. A Hospice Neighbour visited regularly to help with shopping and to keep the garden tidy.</p>
<p>Daily tasks as cancer affected his right arm. A Hospice Neighbour visited weekly to help with cleaning and writing letters.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion and conclusion</st>
<p>Early indication from the pilot areas is that the scheme has potential to make a significant difference to patients and families in local communities. As it became an integral part of hospice community service it will helped to extend choice for those who would prefer to stay at home.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Page, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.138</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.138</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospice neighbours]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>249</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>250</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/250-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beyond talking therapy: diverse bereavement support]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/250-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The purpose of this project was to provide a more comprehensive, inclusive bereavement service to the local community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims were to</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Empower and enable resilience in diverse ways</p>
</li><li>
<p> Offer less threatening support to those not choosing one to one counselling</p>
</li><li>
<p> Offer a social / activity-based alternative for people who develop attachment to hospice-based services</p>
</li><li>
<p> Explore partnerships with other providers, reducing duplication and giving clarification</p>
</li><li>
<p> Integrate Bereavement Needs Assessment (BNA) research findings.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The bereavement service, in its routine evaluation and consultation from our Service User advisory group, confirmed a need for greater diversity in its methods. This led to the &lsquo;traditional&rsquo; bereavement groups being supplemented by cookery, home maintenance classes, walking and creative activity, as well as with drop-in facilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The new groups started successfully, with interest and satisfaction from those using it.</p>
<p>Agreement has been reached with other providers to explore the potential for collaboration and partnership in providing a one stop bereavement service: a joint event is now at the planning stage.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>It is often more vulnerable people who find it harder to use traditional bereavement services and this project will continue to broaden those accessing it. Success also needs to be measured by evidence that people are accessing the right kind of support for themselves.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Early signs are that individual need is being appropriately met through the offer of more diverse forms of support and that potential partners are interested in exploring the benefits of collaboration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prrot, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.139</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.139</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beyond talking therapy: diverse bereavement support]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>250</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>250</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/250-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Collaboration online]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/250-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Hospices face the challenge of managing small and large projects, from developing a new service to a refurbishment or new build. An online system enables people to collaborate and share ideas and documents, quickly and easily.</p>
<p>Without an online system, people rely on meetings, minutes and email; often sending or printing large files with the difficulty of managing different versions.</p>
<p>This hospice has successfully used an online project collaboration product called Basecamp. There are now many similar products: Zoho, Glasscubes, Huddle and Manymoon; some offer charitable pricing and can integrate with Google Apps.</p>
<p>Features include:<l type="tab"><li><p> Storage of documents, spreadsheets, pictures, PDFs</p>
</li><li>
<p> Message threads</p>
</li><li>
<p> Action lists with allocated tasks</p>
</li><li>
<p> Calendar and milestones</p>
</li><li>
<p> Timesheets and Gantt charts</p>
</li><li>
<p> Access by external contractors</p>
</li><li>
<p> Collaborate on writing a document.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The systems are easy to use and often have video tutorials for new users. The Hospice found that their refurbishment project was completed on time and within budget, decisions and discussions with the architect could happen easily and quickly, without the need for extra meetings.</p>
<p>Other collaboration tools include Google Apps, where documents and spreadsheets can be shared and even worked on at the same time. Applications include email, calendar, sites (intranet), all hosted by Google, held securely accessed from anywhere with internet access including mobile.</p>
<p>Many companies are converting to Google Apps &ndash; Jaguar Land Rover, Rentokil, Sue Ryder. Google Apps is provided free to non-profit in the USA and plans to offer the same in the UK, but the date for this has not yet been confirmed.</p>
<p>With increasing numbers of staff needing remote access to documents, online applications can offer greater storage space, effective collaboration, better reliability and improved efficiency.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gale, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.140</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.140</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Collaboration online]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>250</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>250</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/250-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing in house clinical supervision for all]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/250-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Senior Hospice Clinicians used to receive clinical supervision externally. This meant that learning from external sessions wasn't always shared. And more importantly most other staff didn't receive any clinical supervision or even knew what is was.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To address this, a group of in-house staff were trained and supported to facilitate small groups of nurses and rehabilitation staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Externally provided training looked at:<l type="tab"><li><p> Understanding what was clinical supervision</p>
</li><li>
<p> Functions of supervision</p>
</li><li>
<p> The process model</p>
</li><li>
<p> Negotiating a group supervision contract</p>
</li><li>
<p> Challenges, benefits and common dilemmas</p>
</li><li>
<p> Practice facilitating groups</p>
</li><li>
<p> Identifying transferrable skills</p>
</li><li>
<p> Back-up literature.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Attendance at groups could be difficult. Some staff took more responsibility for attending; others had not previously encountered the concept in their professional lives and therefore saw it as an extra unwanted duty.</p>
<p>Two annual surveys were undertaken. These elicited a range of responses, from the highly committed and favourable to those who had not found it easy to incorporate this mode of learning and support into their work.</p>
<p>By the second survey responses were still varied but supervision was definitely now valued and there was no wish to make further changes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The experience highlighted:<l type="tab"><li><p> The need to overcome cultural obstacles where staff had no prior experience of clinical supervision</p>
</li><li>
<p> The importance of terminology &ndash; the groups are now called &lsquo;reflective practice&rsquo;, expressing the greater professional curiosity supervisees can bring to their work</p>
</li><li>
<p> The importance of now extending supervision systems to volunteers who have direct roles with patients and families.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rushton, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.141</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.141</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing in house clinical supervision for all]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>250</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>251</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/251-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hearing voices: sounds great!]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/251-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Over recent years the Hospice has invested significantly in developing a range of means whereby people who use our services and provide the services can influence strategy, change practice and cast opinions into management decision making and clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To be an organisation which genuinely listens to its people, enshrining the concept of a community of care and caring for the community of patients, families and carers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>implemented so far include:</p>
<p>The Service User Forum developing into the Advisory Group involved in:<l type="tab"><li><p> Senior appointments &ndash; Chaplain, CEO, Ward Sister</p>
</li><li>
<p> Patient client information material</p>
</li><li>
<p> The organisation's website strategy</p>
</li><li>
<p> Design, application and interpretation of patient and family Satisfaction Survey (actually undertaken by members of the Service User Forum)</p>
</li><li>
<p> Fundraising and marketing methods</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>A Staff Forum being set up:<l type="tab"><li><p> Regular meetings with C.E.O. and Directors to express concerns and formulate solutions.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Regular Staff Satisfaction Surveys:<l type="tab"><li><p> Using the Times methodology generating depth and breadth of data, now used for three consecutive years.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Staff briefings:<l type="tab"><li><p> CEO gives regular briefings to all staff and volunteers about all aspects of the Hospice.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>It is now expected practice to integrate peoples' voices (opinions) into planning, delivery and evaluation of all domains of the Hospice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The Hospice feels a better place to work &ndash; a &lsquo;listening&rsquo; and consultative approach. Patients and bereaved relatives meeting quarterly with an independent facilitator &lsquo;say it as it is&rsquo; &ndash; real partnership.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saunders, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.142</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.142</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hearing voices: sounds great!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>251</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>251</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/251-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How to get 50 positive press stories on your hospice a month]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/251-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Working effectively with the press can improve local understanding of the work of the hospice and its need for donations.</p>
<p>"Market the hospice more" was one of the first things asked of the marketing department; it was felt that many local people did not understand the work of the hospice or its need for donations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>This paper explains how we have maximised the use of newspapers to achieve this. Success also depends on the cooperation of staff and the press.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p></p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Staff first</st>
<p>Make sure everyone is aware of the need to access patient/family stories &ndash; staff and volunteers are walking newspapers. Explain what a good story is and flag up recent coverage - &lsquo;have you seen our article in the Mercury&rsquo; and display it throughout the hospice. Distribute &lsquo;have you a story&rsquo; cards for patients, visitors and staff to help break the ice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>The media</st>
<p>Implement a media strategy, monitor all local press; and ensure you have a functional press office. Organise public open events, invite all media, make sure the press see all new publications and always send an invitation to visit.</p>
<p>Get to know your editors &ndash; understand what they want and send through weekly stories and pictures that are topical, well timed and well written. Supply a mixture of fundraising and clinical stories.</p>
<p>Hospice stories can help sell newspapers; the hospice has a huge following which could drive up sales.</p>
<p>Offer exclusives and &lsquo;page ready&rsquo; copy and negotiate media partnerships for flagship events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our profile has increased significantly. More people know what we do, why we do it and want to support us.</p>
<p>Regular and positive newspaper coverage opens the doors to the Hospice, and supports fundraising and patient and family care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffery, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.143</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.143</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How to get 50 positive press stories on your hospice a month]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>251</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>251</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/251-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Legal surgery scheme]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/251-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In 2009 18 local solicitors agreed to take part in a free Legal Surgery pilot scheme. This was successful and now it is an integral part of the support services the hospice offers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>&lsquo;Peace of mind&rsquo; and &lsquo;putting one&rsquo;s house in order' were the main drivers with a focus on accessibility for all patients and family members. It would also avoid the inconvenience and expense of an appointment at a solicitor's office.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>How the Legal Surgery operates</st>
<p>The Surgery takes place once a month for an hour with a different solicitor each time. Day Therapy takes place at this time so people do not have the inconvenience of &lsquo;another&rsquo; visit. Clients can either make an appointment in advance or just turn up. The solicitor sets up in our main public area for people dropping by and a room is available for private discussion. The solicitor can telephone those who are unable to travel and staff can ask questions on behalf of patients. There are usually about two or three clients each month.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Administration of the Scheme</st>
<p>The rota is set up 6 months in advance and each solicitor holds one surgery every 18 months. Each solicitor signs an agreement setting out the points of the scheme but there is no obligation by the hospice to ensure there are any clients for them to see. The solicitors also sign a Self-Declaration of Criminal Record and are made aware of our Health and Safety, Vulnerable Adults and Complaints policies. No one firm is given preference over another. The arrangements are made by our Legacy Officer &ndash; a non-clinician.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Advertising the Scheme</st>
<p>There is a leaflet for patients outlining the scheme and posters around the Hospice; most recommendations arise from the social workers and nurses.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.144</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.144</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Legal surgery scheme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>251</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>252</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/252-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Managing a deficit]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/252-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In 2009, a year of global financial uncertainty, a hospice faced a &pound;500k deficit. Trustees and management agreed that this was not sustainable and that spending needed to match income.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Process</st>
<p>Before deciding where to cut costs the management team undertook a mapping process for all the service activities required by patients and families. The key activities were then analysed in relation to cost.</p>
<p>Staff piloted two methods of activity mapping &ndash; a service blueprint and a resource activity map. The service blueprint was found to be more user friendly and facilitated cross department discussions. In addition to this the last 3 years cost and activity data was examined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The process of mapping services highlighted how some activity could be done by different staff or even volunteers, and it encouraged cross departmental discussions rather than silo thinking. Gaps in IT systems and processes were clear.</p>
<p>The results showed a trend of increasing costs but not matched by increasing income. If the trend continued it was clear the organisation risked running out of cash within 4 years.</p>
<p>Trends in activity data showed increasing community activity and home deaths alongside increasing ward costs in decreasing hospice ward deaths.</p>
<p>The whole process was underpinned by a complex communications strategy externally and internally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This evidence enabled the management team to make &pound;500 000 of savings by closing four beds, making three redundancies, terminating fixed term contracts, freezing vacancies, all non-essential training and expenditure.</p>
<p>Surplus ward staff were transferred into the community team.</p>
<p>The hospice is now in a strong financial position and is investing in new posts in fundraising and clinical areas.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gale, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.145</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.145</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Managing a deficit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>252</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>252</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/252-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social media - the twilight years of fundraising]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/252-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>If trends in fundraising have proven anything, it's that all non-profit organisations need to be quick to adapt in order to continue reaching and inspiring large audiences to give.</p>
<p>Regional press sales have been steadily declining for the last 15 years, with many local titles at an all time low.</p>
<p>In contrast, the mass popularity of social media such as Facebook and Twitter offers charities an opportunity to deliver messages, sign people up for fundraising initiatives and become more interactively involved.</p>
<p>Our organisation is about to embark on a number of strategically targeted social media campaigns to raise more money and make full use of the marketing opportunities this can offer. This will include a viral campaign, centred around the open air screening of the movie &lsquo;Twilight&rsquo; locally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Twilight has over 19 million Facebook followers which means that we can use well targeted advertising on Facebook as a key method to sell tickets online for the event. People click on the advert, which will be displayed on their own Facebook page, to take them through to an event page where they can buy a ticket online.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Desired results for a project of this nature are clear &ndash; to sell all tickets and create an exciting fundraising event without the traditional hard hitting charity campaign attached. In the current economic climate, there is a sense &ndash; even if not scientific, that donor fatigue will set in, especially with the high profile campaigns that have been operational recently.</p>
<p>This kind of fundraising avoids &lsquo;over selling&rsquo; the need to raise money for charity. Instead, it markets a hugely exciting event to a massive audience via the various social media channels available, while raising money.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion / conclusion</st>
<p>TBC</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clements, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.146</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.146</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Screening (epidemiology), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social media - the twilight years of fundraising]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>252</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>252</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/252-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The end of life care strategy: where next?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/252-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This research used discourse analysis to examine the End of Life Care Strategy (EOLCS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To uncover dominant, marginal and missing discourses and discuss the implications of these. This research was based on the concept that language does not provide a neutral description of the world.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The analysis identified dominant medical discourses that included &lsquo;not talking&rsquo; and defining a time called &lsquo;end of life&rsquo;. Professional involvement was seen to be crucial in all aspects of end of life care, which seemed to be in line with a government's approach to influence all life processes from pregnancy, birth and death. There were no discourses identified that related to user involvement, compassion or health promotion.</p>
<p>Although there was great emphasis on encouraging people to state their preferences and choices it was purely in relation to their care preferences and place of death. People were described passively and there was no mention of people being encouraged to be in control of the own conditions as there is in other long term conditions. By positioning people in this way the discourses in the EOLCS may be perpetuating the idea that those at the end of their lives are different to everyone else and need to be treated differently.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion and conclusion</st>
<p>The research concludes and suggests that there are already alternatives to a medical discourse by using a health promotion model of palliative care. Dying happens to everyone and does not mean they need to be treated differently. Hospice should consider whether the EOLCS is truly the document that guides the way forward or not. The Demos report offers an alternative to the EOLCS and new challenges for hospices.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gale, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.147</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.147</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pregnancy, Reproductive medicine, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Health promotion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The end of life care strategy: where next?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>252</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>252</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/253-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Triage]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/253-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A hospice first response</p>
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The project focused on introducing a clinical nurse specialist as the triage lead for a hospice service offering day care, inpatient and community care. Referrals had previously been managed by an administrator with clinical support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p>To ensure timely responses to patient and family needs and ensure the organisation's response to referrals was appropriate</p>
</li><li>
<p>Provide meaningful support to professional and lay referrers with a consistent response.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The triage specialist led a rigorous evaluation of the referral process while supportively challenging local referral culture; funding for the triage post was secured from a Big Lottery Fund grant.</p>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Clinical Nurse Specialist and administrative support developed robust systems and processes</p>
</li><li>
<p> Education strategies were employed with local referrers using team and one to one approaches</p>
</li><li>
<p> Professional and lay carer opinion was actively sought through the use of questionnaires.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> The triage approach became a catalyst for a new organisational strategy 2011, because of the identified unmet need</p>
</li><li>
<p> Local regional professionals reported a consistency and transparency in clinical decision-making by the hospice</p>
</li><li>
<p> Hospice staff expressed an increased confidence in first assessment allocation which has indirectly upheld the distinct contributions of each discipline</p>
</li><li>
<p> Average response time to referral reduced to from 1 to 2 days to under 1 day.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion and conclusion</st>
<p>An experienced practitioner as triage lead has enabled further exploration of allocation of first assessment to skill mix within disciplines including healthcare assistants. Examination of triage identified that it was more of a first response with a telephone assessment.</p>
<p>The processes established has quickly become embedded in the Hospice's practice culture and remains a source of pride and comfort during periods of rising public and professional expectation of hospice services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wythe, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.148</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.148</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Triage]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>253</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>253</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/253-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An audit of the advice given to GPs by hospice community nurse specialists regarding step 3 opioids]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/253-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Gold Standards Framework state part of the nurse specialist's role is to ensure early and effective symptom control. Opioid advice is commonly given. Advice should be both correct, evidence based and documentation accurate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To establish the accuracy of advice given about step 3 opiates, noting if documentation was completed, and whether the advice was supported in writing to the prescriber.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>17 CNS answered a questionnaire for every patient they visited either on or starting on opiates. First visits were excluded. Identification was made of those who had a change recommended. Data was collected retrospectively from the patient's records regarding advice given and its documentation. 49 sets of data were analysed using an interpretive approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>100% appropriate interval and route for regular and breakthrough opioid prescribed. 88% (n=43) taking as prescribed. 78% (n=38) on correct breakthrough dose. 93% (n=46) understood breakthrough medication could be repeated after an hour if pain remained poorly controlled. 100% (n=9) opioid switch doses were accurately calculated. 89% (n=27) recorded indication for advice given in patient records. 50% (n=27) communicated written advice to GP. 86% (n=21) ensured timing maintained analgesia. Discussion The results were consistent with the aim of the audit, showing that the advice given is accurate, but that documentation and written communication to GP's is weak. A pro forma letter has been developed to assist in standardising advice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This audit has shown the need for clearly defined standards for documentation of rationale for advice and written communication to GPs. This is hugely relevant for community based specialist nurses who give medication advice on such a regular basis and is noted as a clinical governance issue.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mundy, C., Versaci, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.149</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.149</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Pain (palliative care), Pain (anaesthesia)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An audit of the advice given to GPs by hospice community nurse specialists regarding step 3 opioids]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>253</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>253</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/253-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Brief encounters: the scope of a single music therapy session in adult hospice work]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/253-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Music therapy provision in adult palliative care is still relatively uncommon in the UK, and the scope of music therapy practice is often unfamiliar to the multi-professional team. Although longer-term work is viable with many hospice patients, it is not always possible. A single music therapy session might be all that is achievable before a patient leaves the hospice, or deteriorates and dies. This paper is based on my clinical experience of 10 years working as music therapist in a hospice. It aims to illuminate the value and potential for music therapy within the constraints of very short-term work.</p>
<p>Using case vignettes, three different approaches will be introduced and discussed: receptive work, improvisation and songwriting. Receptive approaches focus on active listening using live or recorded music. This can facilitate reminiscence, relaxation and /or visualisation. Improvisation offers interaction, a musical dialogue. Using simple instruments and supported by the therapist's music, there is the possibility for creativity, new and transformative experience, and the expression of feelings. Songwriting brings together words and music with the potential to create something lasting. It provides the opportunity to articulate and to understand feelings, and often patients report unexpected pleasure and pride in their achievement. A recorded song might have a purpose and life of its own, such as being given or left as a gift, placed in a memory box or played at the funeral.</p>
<p>In my experience music's unique qualities help establish an atmosphere where a trusting therapeutic relationship can develop very quickly. Its flexibility and adaptability enables work at depth even in very short-term work, which can meet the both holistic needs of the patient and their loved ones.</p>
<p>Recorded patient songs will be used to illustrate this presentation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lings, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.150</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.150</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other rehabilitative therapies, Hospice, Complementary medicine, Medical humanities]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Brief encounters: the scope of a single music therapy session in adult hospice work]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>253</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>253</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/254-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dynamic review and development of an orientation and mentorship program for hospice CNSs]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/254-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To improve the orientation and mentorship of Hospice Community Nurse Specialists.</p>
<p>To accelerate skills development and delivery of quality specialist palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Rosser <I>et al</I> (2004) describe role transition from Generalist to Specialist Nurse as complex and stressful. McCreaddie (2001) using grounded theory approach showed that orientation and mentorship are helpful when adopting the Nurse Specialist role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p><l type="ord"><li><p>Literature review</p>
</li><li>
<p>Focus group. CNSs made suggestions for future orientation and mentorship programs</p>
</li><li>
<p>Audit. 18 CNSs reviewed the current Hospice CNS orientation and mentorship program</p>
</li><li>
<p>Formative evaluation through semi informal interviews and summative evaluation by questionnaire at 6/12 post recruitment, after changes to program.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The audit findings were categorised according to % of positive statements:<l type="tab"><li><p> &ge;75% supernumerary period and available learning resources</p>
</li><li>
<p> 40&ndash;75% clinical visits and personal objectives</p>
</li><li>
<p> &le; 40% formal mentorship and role expectations.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The suggestions from the focus group and research evidence were concordant with the audit findings and were used as evidence for change.</p>
<p>Implementation of a competency-based orientation and mentorship guide.</p>
<p>The guide includes competences reflecting National Occupational Standards for end of life care. It includes self and peer assessment, caseload management, guidance for mentors and local information. The guide serves as a teaching tool and benchmark for standards of practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ongoing evaluation</st>
<p>In the summative evaluation post the change, CNSs positively rate mentorship and are clear about their role. The formative evaluation shows they feel supported and are more confident in their role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Changes to the program are dynamic in response to ongoing evaluation and change which will be followed by re-audit in the future. In time, it is hoped that a well prepared work force will promote innovation in specialist palliative care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Attwood, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.151</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.151</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dynamic review and development of an orientation and mentorship program for hospice CNSs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>254</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>254</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/254-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing support for carers in the context of the community]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/254-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We started a Carers Group 4 years ago with a grant from Help the Hospices and quickly realised that we needed to develop a perspective of all the other services that are, or should be, available in the local community.</p>
<p>We developed the activities of the Carers Group in parallel with developing our relationships with voluntary and statutory organisations. Those organisations were also becoming more aware of the needs of carers, committing themselves to a County wide carers Strategy.</p>
<p>We have developed an ethos that ensures that carers feel cared for emotionally and practically, giving them the opportunity to shape activities to meet their needs. The Hospice role has been interpreted narrowly, caring for the dying, mostly cancer patients, in the community. We needed to create strong professional relationships with a wide range of voluntary services as well with the County carers support services and with the NHS. We also recognised that many carers as well as hospice staff were unaware of the support available from libraries, education, housing services, the Red Cross, and particularly Citizens Advice Bureau. Using a range of methods we have built relationships with these and other bodies.</p>
<p>The group has been continuously monitored and reviewed by an internal management group and by a steering group including external stakeholders with relevant perspectives. This is an invaluable source of information as well as providing an informed critique of the group's activities.</p>
<p>Over time, using publicity, attending and setting up local activities and taking part in training, the Carers Group has become recognised as specialising in the support of end of life caring but a significant part of carers support locally. As those relationships have developed Carers Group members are receiving an improved service not only from the Carers Group itself but also through accessing many other available services.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dutfield, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.152</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.152</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing support for carers in the context of the community]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>254</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>254</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/254-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Establishing a nurse led specialist palliative care satellite clinic]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/254-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Increasing referral numbers within a rural location have prompted us to explore new ways of working to not only increase timely access to specialist palliative care services but also to also ensure that these services, when deployed, function effectively and meet the changing needs of patients and families.</p>
<p>A Specialist Palliative Care nurse led satellite clinic based within a rural general practice offers scheduled appointments to appropriate patients,<l type="tab"><li><p> Facilitating enhanced communication with primary healthcare colleagues</p>
</li><li>
<p> Expediating effective symptom control by facilitating multidisciplinary team working</p>
</li><li>
<p> Promoting continuity and seamless care.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The project is important because it challenges traditional ways of working and standard community nurse specialist role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="ord"><li><p>To increase access to specialist palliative care services within a rural location</p>
</li><li>
<p>To expediate symptom control</p>
</li><li>
<p>To evaluate the patients experience of new models of service provision- this will inform future service development.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> A literature review was undertaken</p>
</li><li>
<p> A potential pilot site and CNS caseload was identified</p>
</li><li>
<p> Service user consultation was undertaken by one to one discussions</p>
</li><li>
<p> Comparable services were benchmarked</p>
</li><li>
<p> An audit strategy including a service user satisfaction survey, 360 degree review and use of recognised outcome measurement tools has been planned</p>
</li><li>
<p> Key stakeholder support was secured and a pilot agreed.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Interim data suggests:<l type="tab"><li><p> Initial service user reluctance</p>
</li><li>
<p> Improved team working with primary healthcare colleagues</p>
</li><li>
<p> Increased user choice</p>
</li><li>
<p> Reduced travelling time for CNS.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> The satellite clinic is now established within a supportive GP practice</p>
</li><li>
<p> A small number of patients are currently accessing the clinic</p>
</li><li>
<p> Multidisciplinary team working with primary healthcare colleagues has been markedly enhanced</p>
</li><li>
<p> The CNS's educational activity within the host practice is increased.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gibson, V., Grint, T., Campbell, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.153</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.153</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Establishing a nurse led specialist palliative care satellite clinic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>254</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>255</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/255-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the impact of nurse independent prescribing within a weekend CNS service]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/255-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Nurse independent prescribing (NIP) is a development of the nursing role that has been long awaited by both the Royal College of Nursing and the Nursing and Midwifery Council and is now widely celebrated. However, it has been met with varied responses among cancer and palliative care CNSs. In fact, while the Department of Health's End of Life Care Strategy encourages nurses to pioneer new ways of working in order to provide rapid access to specialist palliative care advice and assessment, the literature reveals a reluctance within CNS teams to embrace this development of the role, to undertake prescribing training and, once qualified, to practice as prescribers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>This study evaluates the impact of nurse independent prescribing within a weekend CNS service at one hospice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A 6 month audit of prescribing activity data is presented in this study. In addition to this, specific case studies are used to highlight the benefits of CNS nurse prescribing in the out of hours (OOH) period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This study demonstrates that the skills of nurse prescribing offer an effective way for the CNS to be more responsive to the changing and unpredictable needs of palliative patients, especially in the OOH period, enabling timely and appropriate symptom control in a single, seamless consultation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Discussion surrounds the challenges of OOH access to drugs, off-label prescribing, CPD, mentorship, professional support and communication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This paper celebrates role expansion and innovations in practice, demonstrates the value of NIP in the OOH period, challenges and encourages other CNS teams to consider OOH NIP initiatives, and offers specific guidance and recommendations for developing and sustaining such a service.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Webb, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.154</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.154</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the impact of nurse independent prescribing within a weekend CNS service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>255</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/255-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Debating forum - what do you think?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/255-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Those working with dying people have described feeling like they are &lsquo;walking a legal and ethical tightrope&rsquo;. This is largely due to the fact that decision making is often complex and emotive. Considering decisions from an ethical viewpoint can help make sense of dilemmas often faced within palliative care. Evidence also shows that individuals are more motivated and gain more job satisfaction when they feel appreciated and valued and listened to.</p>
<p>Debate is one formal method of interactive discussion which both encourages the exploration of issues from an ethical viewpoint and provides the opportunity for individuals to have their voices heard.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To provide a structured forum for members of the organisation to:<l type="tab"><li><p> Debate relevant, current and/or ethical issues</p>
</li><li>
<p> Encourage understanding and appreciation of each others views in a safe environment</p>
</li><li>
<p> Reflect on practice in regard to decision making.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Bi monthly hour long forums are held. Topics and speakers are coordinated by the learning and development manager who also chairs the sessions. The forum is open to all staff, volunteers and external healthcare partners.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Topics to date include:<l type="tab"><li><p> Assisted suicide &ndash;should the law be changed?</p>
</li><li>
<p> Should we always tell the truth?</p>
</li><li>
<p> Does having a faith matter in the hospice environment?</p>
</li><li>
<p> Generalist versus specialist within palliative care.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Up to 35 people have attended including the Chief executive, directors, managers, clinicians, support staff fundraisers and volunteers. Feedback has been overwhelmingly positive.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The results suggest the introduction of structured debate is regarded as an exciting, valuable opportunity to listen, be listened to, reflect and develop. The impact has been positive, thought provoking, unifying and motivating for all who have taken part suggesting that the aims have been achieved.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nuckhir, C., Stocks, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.155</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.155</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Suicide (psychiatry), Assisted dying, End of life decisions (ethics), Suicide (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Debating forum - what do you think?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>255</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/255-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing core competencies for staff and using them in the hospice environment to define behaviour]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/255-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The development of core competencies to be used across the Hospice was prompted by an identified need to clarify the expectations of everyone working for the organisation.</p>
<p>In 2009 it was identified that competencies used in interviewing were not actively being used or understood and a project plan was developed.</p>
<p>A project lead was identified and seven members of staff from various departments joined the group, along with HR Consultants who volunteered part of their time so the cost was minimised.</p>
<p>The group initially defined and agreed seven competencies along with short descriptors:<l type="tab"><li><p> People Care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Motivation and Initiative</p>
</li><li>
<p> Change and Adaptability</p>
</li><li>
<p> Planning and Organisation</p>
</li><li>
<p> Analysis and Decision Making Ability</p>
</li><li>
<p> Coaching and Teamwork</p>
</li><li>
<p> Leadership.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The next task of the group was to agree descriptions of behaviours for all three competencies at three levels. This work involved consulting with staff to ensure that the wording used was meaningful and relevant to the staff.</p>
<p>All job descriptions were reviewed to ensure that they specified the competencies required and at which level. Following this a question bank was developed which provides a range of interview questions for each of the competencies at each level; line managers were trained in interview techniques so they were able to judge the evidence from the answers.</p>
<p>All applicants for employment are sent a copy of the core competencies so that expectations of all employees are made clear from the outset. The final stage of the project is to include the core competencies in performance review documentation and this is currently being tested.</p>
<p>This project has been wide ranging and has enabled the Hospice to clarify expectations of staff at all levels as well as giving line managers the tools to effectively praise good performance as well as managing poor performance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moorey, A., Bourne, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.156</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.156</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing core competencies for staff and using them in the hospice environment to define behaviour]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>256</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/256-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Food for thought!]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/256-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The hospice recognised the importance of good nutrition for palliative care patients but there was a lack of research in relation to their nutritional needs. As a result, in 2008, it established a nutritional working party.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Increase the diet and nutritional needs knowledge of clinical staff</p>
</li><li>
<p> Improve recording of individual dietary needs</p>
</li><li>
<p> Give patients permission to eat what they choose and develop the food choices available to them</p>
</li><li>
<p> Review of the availability and benefit of nutritional supplements</p>
</li><li>
<p> Improved the quality of nutritional advice across all departments.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>To form a multi professional group who has representation from the nursing and medical teams, community dietician, catering department and volunteers. The group meets at 6 weekly intervals and its purpose is to:<l type="tab"><li><p> Educate all staff members on the provision of nutritional care for patients with life limiting illness</p>
</li><li>
<p> Create new initiatives to enhance the provision of nutritional care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Develop more collaborative working with multi professionals in nutritional care.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The group has initiated:<l type="tab"><li><p> Nutritional theme weeks</p>
</li><li>
<p> Alcoholic drinks menu</p>
</li><li>
<p> Increased variety of food choices</p>
</li><li>
<p> Education board and resources folder</p>
</li><li>
<p> Training sessions in relation to food choices and appropriate nutritional supplements.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>There has been positive verbal feedback from staff members and service users. The working group has demonstrated excellent collaborative working leading to a greater understanding of nutritional care and has highlighted the need for future innovations, such as nutritional competencies, and the development of nutritional assessments.</p>
<p>The hospice is participating in the Help the Hospices patient survey the results of which will inform this work. It has also participated in a Help the Hospices pilot to develop a nutritional assessment tool.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bacon, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.157</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.157</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diet, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Food for thought!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>256</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>256</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/256-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving psychosocial care: the way forward]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/256-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A review identified the need to:<l type="tab"><li><p> Create a strategy for delivering psychosocial care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Develop psychosocial skills</p>
</li><li>
<p> Provide counselling.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>Undertake a pilot to<l type="tab"><li><p> Allow time and give value to the psychological well-being of patients/families</p>
</li><li>
<p> Enable staff to recognise emotional distress and empower them to act upon it</p>
</li><li>
<p> Enable difficult conversations to be handled confidently and sensitively.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Recruited six, part time counsellors</p>
</li><li>
<p> Reflective sessions to share experiences</p>
</li><li>
<p> Introduction of 10 Psychosocial Care Champions</p>
</li><li>
<p> Questionnaire to establish a baseline</p>
</li><li>
<p> Training in providing psychosocial care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Clinical supervision &ndash; supervisor and supervisee training, developing documentation</p>
</li><li>
<p> Innovative training of volunteers and non-clinical staff in psychosocial skills.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Psychosocial Champions &ndash; encourage informal, regular conversations about psychosocial needs</p>
</li><li>
<p> Counsellors provided a safe space to express and explore patients' sense of loss</p>
</li><li>
<p> "Hospice brand" brought familiarity enabling counsellors to develop therapeutic relationships in short timeframe</p>
</li><li>
<p> Questionnaire (42% response) revealed:</p>
</li><li>
<p> Time and capacity &ndash; an ongoing challenge</p>
</li><li>
<p> Respondents were able to:</p>
</li><li>
<p> Identify psychological/social needs and own limitations</p>
</li><li>
<p> Develop trusting, non-judgemental relationships with patients/carers.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Insufficient capacity to improve psychosocial data &ndash; next phase</p>
</li><li>
<p> Questionnaire will be repeated to assess the progress made.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This pilot phase has identified the need to have a full time resource driving psychosocial care who will:<l type="tab"><li><p> Ensure specialist and general psychosocial support for patients/families is available at all times</p>
</li><li>
<p> Continue to develop the MDT</p>
</li><li>
<p> Create a culture where people feel confident to try new skills</p>
</li><li>
<p> Ongoing training and development</p>
</li><li>
<p> Develop a tool kit based on the findings from the questionnaire</p>
</li><li>
<p> Maintain the integration of bereavement services</p>
</li><li>
<p> Increase external liaison with other services</p>
</li><li>
<p> Explore the possibility of income generation.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clarke, K., Wass, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.158</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.158</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving psychosocial care: the way forward]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>256</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>256</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/256-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Keeping medicines management on the radar!]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/256-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A trend identified that drug errors were happening due to complacency and a shortfall in nurses' capabilities in Medicines Management. The potentially serious consequences of this led to the introduction of a rolling medicines management programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To create an effective Medicines Management system containing structure and guidance in order to ensure patients' safety and minimise the occurrence of drug errors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Introduction of a yearly medicine management programme which includes:<l type="tab"><li><p> Training sessions &ndash; responsibility and accountabilities, update on drug calculation skills</p>
</li><li>
<p> Annual drug calculation test</p>
</li><li>
<p> Annual drug administration competency</p>
</li><li>
<p> Annual syringe driver assessment</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>A scoring system for medication errors was implemented to ensure consistency in assessing the severity of the drug errors and determining the appropriate action to take.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The Medicines Management Policy and Procedure has been amended and awareness of good medicine management is embedded in the daily routine. The hospice encourages a supportive culture, involving staff in the process of investigation and the implementation of new ways of working. Medication errors and near misses are managed in a fair and supportive manner.</p>
<p>All staff successfully achieved the pass rate of 95% for their Drug Calculation Test. The number of incidences of drug errors has fallen by 50% within the last 12 month period.</p>
<p>The focus on this area has enabled trends to be identified, both general and individual, and remedial action taken to improve practice. Measures have also been taken to minimise risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Awareness, communication, education and support are the main drivers for the reduction in drug errors. Staff feel more confident as their competencies have increased.</p>
<p>The implementation of an annual programme keeps medicine management on the radar and the programme is an effective and efficient investment to enhance patient safety.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schrikker, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.159</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.159</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Unwanted effects / adverse reactions, Medical error/ patient safety]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Keeping medicines management on the radar!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>256</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>257</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/257-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reaching out to care homes: a new specialist practitioner service]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/257-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The End of Life Care (EoLC) Strategy (2008) recognises that most people in care homes consider it to be their main residence, and the place where most would choose to die yet deaths in care homes represent 16% of all deaths.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To provide:<l type="tab"><li><p> Support for patients and staff in care homes to access medications and expertise in palliative care to prevent hospital admissions</p>
</li><li>
<p> An opportunity for patients /families to express their wishes for preferred priorities of care to prevent them dying in unfamiliar surroundings.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>All new referrals for residents in care homes (not known to community palliative care services) were taken by the Specialist Nurse Practitioner and further clinical information obtained from the GP or hospital.</p>
<p>An assessment visit was organised, and the data on referrals and interventions were recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>64 patients were supported:<l type="tab"><li><p> 81% died in the care home</p>
</li><li>
<p> 4% were either still alive or place of death was unknown</p>
</li><li>
<p> 4% died in hospital and 1% in the hospice</p>
</li><li>
<p> 25 prescriptions were issued for anticipatory drugs</p>
</li><li>
<p> 24 prescriptions were amended</p>
</li><li>
<p> 7 homes requested, and were provided with, training in EoLC.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Patients were able to receive support at the end of life and to remain in their own environment, without trained nurses on the premises. The need for increased training in EoLC, highlighted by staff, was also met.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This innovative service achieved the vision of both the EoLC Strategy and the hospice's objective of reaching patients and staff in care homes to reduce hospital deaths and to meet training needs. It empowered the carers in the home by giving them the confidence to comply with residents' wishes knowing that appropriate support was available.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skilton, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.160</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.160</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Nursing, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reaching out to care homes: a new specialist practitioner service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>257</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/257-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reaching out to schools: a vocational experience programme for school students]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/257-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Traditionally, the hospice has offered vocational placements to students over the age of 16 who are undergoing health and social care training at College or University. There had been many requests from schools for placements for the under 16's who have a &lsquo;work experience&rsquo; week as part of their Year 10 studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To work with local secondary schools to enable their students (aged 15) to participate in worthwhile and productive vocational experience within the hospice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Students who choose vocational experience within the hospice are invited with their parents to discuss the work of the hospice, have a tour and discuss a programme for the week.</p>
<p>Following the meeting an information pack is sent to the student which includes objectives, the programme, and information around confidentiality.</p>
<p>A typical programme would include:<l type="tab"><li><p> Working on the In patient unit, and with Hospice @ Home</p>
</li><li>
<p> Working in Day Therapy, attending breathing clinics and joining in activities, such as art therapy</p>
</li><li>
<p> Observing the complementary therapists</p>
</li><li>
<p> Meeting with a Counsellor and the Chaplain.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>On day one there is an induction with a Mentor who the student will meet with each day to discuss their learning experience.</p>
<p>On completion of the placement, Evaluation forms are completed by the student and the organisation, and a Certificate of Attendance and Achievement issued.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Very positive feedback has been received from the schools, students and hospice staff and volunteers, with students showing an increased interest in volunteering.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This new programme has:<l type="tab"><li><p> Raised the profile of the hospice within the local school community</p>
</li><li>
<p> Led the hospice to reflect on the lower age limit for volunteering</p>
</li><li>
<p> Enabled the hospice to make further links with schools in relation to the curriculum.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stocks, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.161</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.161</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other rehabilitative therapies, Airway biology, Confidentiality, Legal and forensic medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reaching out to schools: a vocational experience programme for school students]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>257</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/257-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Time & support - the essential ingredients for the development of the healthcare assistant]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/257-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A competency framework was implemented for band two and three Healthcare Assistants (HCA's) in 2010. This highlighted areas of extended practice outside of the core competencies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>The HCA's expressed a strong desire to enhance their role, increase job satisfaction and feel valued within the organisation. A training and support structure was implemented to enable them to achieve this.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The HCA's self assessed their performance against the competency framework and then had a 1:1 meeting with their manager to discuss:<l type="tab"><li><p> Individual strengths and interests</p>
</li><li>
<p> Professional development</p>
</li><li>
<p> Training needs.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The competency workbooks provided information which helped the planning and implementation of a bespoke training programme for HCA's.</p>
<p>To ensure the staff were able to take on additional roles, protected time for education and peer support was introduced.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>As a direct result of these initiatives, the HCA's have been able to enhance their job role. Some examples include participation in audit, presenting patients at multi professional team meetings and a more active role during handover. Specific new roles have also been introduced for them including responsibility for fire prevention and training, moving and handling, NVQ assessing, external presentations around End of Life Care, infection control, nutrition, and IT champions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The general consensus from the team of HCA's is that they feel happier with the new aspects of their role and they sense that their presence in the organisation is greater.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Healthcare assistants perform better by being offered variety within their roles without extra financial budgetary implications. They feel empowered, valued and supported and this is echoed in feedback from other professionals within the organisation and external partners.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schrikker, T., Bacon, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.162</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.162</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Time & support - the essential ingredients for the development of the healthcare assistant]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>258</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/258-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing the assistant practitioner role for palliative and end of life care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/258-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In 2009 Foundation Degree Forward and Help the Hospices encouraged member hospices to collaborate in developing a Foundation Degree in Palliative and End of Life Care. The objective was to provide a nationally recognised qualification for palliative care professionals, who traditionally, have not engaged in career development through academic achievement. A uniformity of approach would provide consistency and transferability across sectors. Within palliative care, this &lsquo;new&rsquo; role would assist the delivery of future workforce planning, through cost effective and flexible skill mix enrichment.</p>
<p>Three pilot initiatives emerged from across the UK; St. Ann's Hospice Manchester, St. Margaret's Hospice, Somerset and St Nicholas Hospice, Bury St Edmonds.</p>
<p>A steering group was formed with representation from relevant provider organisations including Strategic Health Authorities, educational providers, Social Services, community providers and hospices. A scoping exercise ascertained how the Assistant Practitioner role could be integrated into existing services. Job descriptions were subsequently written encompassing the Palliative Care and End of Life module. Recruitment to the degree programme commenced in 2010.</p>
<sec><st>Pilot implementation</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> St Ann's Hospice in partnership with NHS North West and NHS Bolton: 15 Trainee Assistant Practitioners (TAP's) commenced Foundation Degree programme in January 2011 (University of Bolton as the Education provider)</p>
</li><li>
<p> St Margaret's Hospice in partnership with Strode College commenced a level 5 Diploma for TAP's in 2011</p>
</li><li>
<p> St Nicholas Hospice in partnership with a local HEI have a Foundation Degree starting in 2011 with 2 candidates to date.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Future steps</st>
<p>Evaluation of the foundation degree programme throughout training and 12 months post qualification. Evaluation will include perceptions of course participants on course content, delivery and relevance to role, followed by observational activity analysis post qualification and delivery of Assistant Practitioner role.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arkwright, S., Hewitt, C., Bass, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.163</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.163</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing the assistant practitioner role for palliative and end of life care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>258</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>258</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/258-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nursing workforce modelling in UK hospices - recommendations for future planning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/258-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Context</st>
<p>United Kingdom (UK) hospice ward staffing has remained unchallenged for two decades while specialist palliative care provision has changed markedly, bringing new workforce demands. Yet, there has been little evidence to inform hospice workforce structures, which aspire to deliver the highest quality holistic care to specialist palliative care patients and their carers. Workforce planning and development has been described as ensuring that sufficient (but not over-sufficient) and appropriately qualified staff are available, in the right place and at the right time to match service demand. Key elements that influence nurse staffing levels include ward occupancy, patient dependency, nursing activity, workload and staff mix.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>An evaluation method adapted from a UK-wide nursing workforce planning and development study was used to assess nursing activity in a patient (and carer) dependency context within 13 hospices (16 wards).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>A dataset, which profiles and benchmarks hospice ward patient dependency, nursing workload, staff activity, ward establishments, quality and costs in 16 hospice wards has been created. There are marked differences between hospices across the UK within each of the workforce modelling elements. Hospice ward staff face heavier workloads; wards are better staffed and more expensive to run, but deliver higher-quality care than their NHS counterparts. Structural and procedural differences between hospice wards in the study are hard to explain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions and recommendations</st>
<p>The hospice dataset provides evidence-based recommendations to inform specialist palliative care nursing workforce modelling, including deciding future nursing workforce size and mix based on rising workloads. The new dataset is suitable for use in all UK hospice wards.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberts, D., Hurst, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.164</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.164</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Nursing, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nursing workforce modelling in UK hospices - recommendations for future planning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>258</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>258</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/258-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Practice development unit - every person makes a difference]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/258-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Practice Development has become an established element of nursing clinical development in the UK. While hospices may employ individuals to facilitate clinical practice developments, a wider organisational approach to practice development is less evident. Over the last 2 years St Ann's Hospice, Manchester embarked on an organisational approach to Practice Development through accreditation with Leeds University.</p>
<p>The purpose of this initiative was to encourage an ethos of Practice Development throughout the organisation, across all services (paid and voluntary) and professional groups (clinical and non-clinical). The key aim was to encourage wider organisational engagement and empowerment, in the development of quality care and service provision for patients and carers.</p>
<p>The accreditation process began with the formation of Practice Development Lead and Steering Groups. Lead group membership had representatives from different levels and disciplines within the Hospice. The Steering Group membership involved some key Hospice personnel, representatives from local Community Palliative Care Services, Manchester University School of Nursing, business expertise and service users. Accreditation included developing a Practice Development framework, sourcing evidence to achieve the 15 core criteria set by Leeds University, and interim and final on site assessment from a diverse accreditation team.</p>
<p>Examples of projects undertaken over the 2 years that positively influence patient care are:<l type="tab"><li><p> The provision of laundry net bags for patients clothes, that can be clearly labelled to prevent loss</p>
</li><li>
<p> A new recycling scheme throughout the organisation which reduces waste and cost</p>
</li><li>
<p> The production of a physiotherapy DVD for patients to be used by their bedside.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The initiative has proven its worth as a mechanism for harnessing the creativity of staff and volunteers from across the whole organisation, particularly with groups that previously perceived their roles to be less involved in the development of quality patient focused care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norris, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.165</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.165</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Hospice, Physiotherapy, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Practice development unit - every person makes a difference]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>258</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>259</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/259-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Day services partnership working]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/259-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>St. John's Hospice - Lancaster, serves patients within its Community for palliative and end of life care. Despite not being set up specifically for cancer patients, the hospice services are predominantly accessed by cancer patients.</p>
<p>The Day hospice services have recently undertaken a number of initiatives to try to encourage wider access by long term conditions patients. The first success was a 'One Stop Multi-disciplinary Clinic' for motor neuron disease patients. Here patients are able to see members of the Multi-disciplinary team and the Nurse Specialist at a single hospice based clinic.</p>
<p>Following this success the team were keen to extend the services to other long term condition groups. Initiated by a a meeting with the Parkinson's Disease Society &ndash; including some of their patients &ndash; it was agreed to host their support group which would include a weekly gentle exercise group. This commenced following a launch day.</p>
<p>The Day Hospice more recently piloted a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) programme. The aim being to empower patients and help them gain control of their situation as they experienced disease progression. The programme which was done in partnership with the COPD specialist acute team and the hospice team set out a 6 week programme where patients were offered information, time and support. They dealt with issues such as fatigue, breathing exercises and discussed concerns around Preferred Priorities of Care and Advanced Care Planning using a multi-disciplinary approach.</p>
<p>All the initiatives were matched against the QIPP agenda. Following the COPD programme five of the nine patients have accessed the day hospice. The staff and volunteers within the hospice have gained education from the specialists involved and each of the stakeholders/partners have had positive feedback from the users of the services. Moreover patients are also being introduced to other services within the hospice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnson, W., Sinclair, J., Reeder, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.166</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.166</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Drugs: CNS (not psychiatric), Motor neurone disease, Neuromuscular disease, Parkinson''s disease, End of life decisions (palliative care), Airway biology, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Day services partnership working]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>259</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/259-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[It's good to talk: an insight into counselling]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/259-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Therapeutic movement remains valid right up to the end of life, maybe particularly so when "unfinished business" maybe hovers near. Counselling can meet and absorb the unpredictability that any client may bring to a Hospice, or any other care setting. This presentation is intended to promote the effective use of such a service in Hospices aiming to offer holistic care.</p>
<p>An insight into Counselling is presented, to promote understanding of how a space to talk can go far beyond other supportive relationships. Counselling can provide a lot of comfort, but it is designed to offer a whole lot more. A fictionalised re-enactment is offered, based on two actual counselling sessions, showing how highly distressing material may be worked with. It should be noted that this relates to experiences that some may find difficult to discuss.</p>
<p>The actual life experiences shared in any counselling is unpredictable. Once a relationship develops there is maybe an ethical duty to see it through even if a difficult referral might be made. In the palliative care realm specifically, there is sometimes maybe no time for a second attempt, or even a referral. For this reason, the added flexibility that person-centred counselling offers is useful here.</p>
<p>Any counselling might be seen as an emergent research process unique to the client, the counsellor and the relationship they form, allowing the client to explore whatever they may and find their way through their difficulties.</p>
<p>The presentation is intended to promote understanding of the space that person-centred counselling offers when facing the unpredictability there is in meeting any person in a holistic way. While this is based on an unusual and even extreme situation, the importance of being prepared to meet whatever may come is underlined.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harrison, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.167</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.167</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[It's good to talk: an insight into counselling]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>259</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/259-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance care planning documentation adopted county-wide]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/259-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The process of advance care planning is a vital and integral part of our practice. A need was identified for documentation to be developed locally to enable written records of patients' preferences and goals at the end of life which would also provide a tool for healthcare professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To develop an Advance Decision and Advance Statement form with guidelines for health and social care professionals.</p>
</li><li>
<p> To develop patient information leaflets.</p>
</li><li>
<p> To gain service user feedback about the use of the forms.</p>
</li><li>
<p> To subject the forms to rigorous review by the hospice clinical governance committee, PCT and hospital trust committees before launching the forms and guidelines county-wide.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The draft forms were piloted for 3 months at the hospice. Feedback about ease of completion, appropriate timing of discussions and positive outcomes or problems relating to use of the forms, were collated. The forms and guidelines were then subject to review in all care settings, including trust resuscitation committees and solicitor.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>All patients and staff involved in the pilot found the forms easy or very easy to complete. One patient died in his preferred place of care as a direct consequence. Most patients wished their GPs and hospital consultants to have a copy of their completed form. The forms are now progressing through the documentation committee; respective logos will then be added prior to their launch.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Introducing the forms across all settings, accompanied by education and training, aims to raise the profile of advance care planning and improve exchange of information so that professionals in all settings are aware of a patient's documented wishes for end of life care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chester, H., Johnson, S., Jones, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.168</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.168</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance care planning documentation adopted county-wide]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>260</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/260-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Small is beautiful]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/260-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Something's it's the small things....</p>
<p>In Summer 2010 we picked up an great idea from the NCPC for &lsquo;Small is Beautiful&rsquo; aimed to get patient and carer feedback on what small things make a difference to them. Not only did the team at St. Michael's Hospice think this was a fantastic idea but it also fitted nicely with our commitment to using feedback to guide service development and improve the way in which we work.</p>
<p>While we felt it was important to know what our patients and families thought of the Hospice we also used it as an opportunity for staff and volunteers to feedback their thoughts.</p>
<p>Some of our patient comments:<l type="tab"><li><p> Feeling cared for.</p>
</li><li>
<p> A home from home.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Thank you for the cake, it was yummy!</p>
</li><li>
<p> Treating each other as special.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Being offered some lunch during a long visit, thank you so very much.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Thanks for the comfortable sofas!</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>With regards to staff and volunteer feedback we have implemented many new initiatives including a rolling educational programme, a monthly staff bulletin, more social events and most importantly improved the quality of our tea bags!</p>
<p>We ran the campaign for 6 weeks and produced Boards which were displayed in patient areas, the Hospice staff room and our seven Hospice shops. People could put their comments on the board.</p>
<p>It was an interesting exercise for us all and provided us with a better understanding of what is important to our visitors and staff and allowed us to make some simple but necessary changes to the way in which we work. We hope to continue building on this in the future and plan to run the Small is Beautiful campaign again in April 2011 where no doubt we will receive some more interesting comments.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stubbs, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.169</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.169</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Small is beautiful]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>260</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>260</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/260-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Poetry and creative writing in palliative care: an alternative approach to communication]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/260-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim of project</st>
<p>To explore whether participating in poetry reading and/or creative writing sessions within a hospice has a positive impact on patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Funding from the Scottish Art Council enabled a Hospice to work with two poets facilitating five poetry reading sessions and seven creative writing sessions. All sessions were co-facilitated by a clinical nurse specialist in palliative care. The poetry reading sessions included a poet reading a wide range of poetry, including requests from patients. After each poem space was created for patients to respond to the poems and discussion was encouraged. The creative writing sessions were facilitated by a poet who assisted patients with writing their own poems through providing a prompt and structure for the writing. A specific focus was chosen for each session, for example &lsquo;places we know&rsquo;, &lsquo;houses we have lived in, and &lsquo;favourite objects&rsquo;. Each session lasted for one and a half hours. The sessions were evaluated by staff and patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>25 patients attended one or more than one session with staff members attending poetry reading sessions.</p>
<p>Patients' and staffs' comments on the sessions were themed into: positive occupation, bringing back memories, sharing of stories and fostering dialogue.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Creative writing and poetry within palliative care provides an alternative approach to communication that facilitates social interaction and &lsquo;sharing of stories&rsquo; that may otherwise not occur. This alternative approach to communication provides common ground and a unique way for the patients to connect with each other.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haraldsottir, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.170</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.170</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Poetry and creative writing in palliative care: an alternative approach to communication]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>260</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>260</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/260-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring hand size in patients with breast cancer related lymphoedema (BCRL)]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/260-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Breast cancer related lymphoedema (BCRL) affects 24&ndash;42% of patients after treatment for breast cancer. The gold standard method to measure the hand swelling associated with BCRL is to submerge the hand/arm into water and measure the amount of water displaced. This method is not always possible clinically and the figure of eight method, which involves wrapping a simple measuring tape around the hand in a specific way, may be an alternative method of measurement.</p>
<p>The aim of the study was to examine the reliability and validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand size in women with BCRL.</p>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>24 people with BCRL had their affected hand measured by both the water displacement and tape measure methods by two novice therapists (testers). The figure of eight measurements were taken using a blank tape which was then measured against a meter stick by the recorder. For the water displacement method, subjects were asked to submerge their hand into the water filled volumeter. The volume of the water displaced was measured and recorded by the recorder. The therapists were therefore blind to the results. Each method was repeated three times and the order of testing was randomised between subjects and testers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>24 full sets of data were available for analysis. In terms of intertester reliability the ICC values ranged form 0.825 to 0.854. For intratester reliability ICCs were 0.889 for tester 1 and 0.919 for tester 2. For validity Pearson's &ndash; moment correlation was 0.700 for tester 1 and 0.752 for tester 2 (both p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The figure of eight method was found to be a valid and reliable method of measuring hand swelling. The findings of this study would support the use of this simple clinical measurement for determining the extent of hand swelling in women with BCRL.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borthwick, Y., Paul, L., Sneddon, M., McAlpine, L., Miller, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.171</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.171</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring hand size in patients with breast cancer related lymphoedema (BCRL)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>260</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>261</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/261-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Learning lessons: how listening makes us more local]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/261-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>At Sue Ryder we'd like to share what people told us about the way we communicate and the specialist palliative and end of life care we provide. We'd like to talk about the things people told us and the improvements we're now making.</p>
<p>We asked what a specialist palliative and end of life care provider needs to do, to be better. After listening to what people told us, and looking at the health and social care sector, we're making visible changes in how people understand and experience our services. We'd like to share what we've learnt.</p>
<p>The session will share research findings. Sources include: IPSOS MORI and service-users. We'll talk about how the experience of inpatient and day therapy services. We'll describe the way we're now communicating with service users, families and friends. We'll refer to case studies including the Department of Health funded capital scheme at Sue Ryder &ndash; Manorlands Hospice. We'll also share what how introducing new touch-screen technology, and the Information Standard, can help improve the quality and integrity of print and online communications.</p>
<p>The session will cover lessons learnt, and how some assumptions were challenged. We'll show how listening is now helping us build a better future.</p>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Share research evidence from IPSOS MORI, NOP, and service-users</p>
</li><li>
<p> Case study the Department of Health capital scheme at Sue Ryder- Manorlands Hospice, Yorkshire</p>
</li><li>
<p> Describe how we're increasing local engagement and identity</p>
</li><li>
<p> Explain how new technologies and printed information can create better user experiences and assurance</p>
</li><li>
<p> Describe how these lessons are influencing a new state of the art hospice facility at Peterborough, in Cambridgeshire (opens 2013).</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ladds, M., Davison, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.172</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.172</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Learning lessons: how listening makes us more local]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>261</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/261-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospice apprentice with the South Asian community]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/261-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Presentation aim</st>
<p>To explore the implications for hospices of a 3 year DH funded project based at Sue Ryder Manorlands Hospice with the twin aims of<l type="tab"><li><p> Increasing the access for specialist Palliative care from the South Asian community</p>
</li><li>
<p> Achieving the first aim by recruiting 10 unemployed people from the South Asian Community to 12 month apprenticeships with an NVQ in Health and Social care.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methodology</st>
<p>It is recognised nationally that there is a very low uptake of specialist palliative care services from people from various ethnic minority backgrounds and also a significant problem in recruiting skilled healthcare staff from these same communities. Various research studied have identified the problems but little work has been undertaken to find practical solutions to engaging effectively with these communities. The project is set in an area of high deprivation and high levels of unemployment within the South Asian community.</p>
<p>Working in partnership with the PCT and local community organisations the project takes a community development approach to recruit unemployed people from these communities into apprenticeship posts which will give them the skills and qualifications in Health and Social care. As part of their apprenticeship each student is involved in developing shared understanding, new ways of working together as well as breaking down the barriers between the South Asian community and the various statutory and voluntary sector healthcare organisations involved in palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>An independent evaluation is being undertaken by the University of Bradford and the results of their interim report are used as the basis for this presentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The research demonstrates a practical model which can be adapted by any hospice who wants to increase access to hard to reach communities and improve recruitment from similar groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davison, S., Hussaine, S., Taylor, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.173</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.173</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospice apprentice with the South Asian community]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>261</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/261-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Challenges in the transfer of patients from hospice to nursing home: a model for future partnership]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/261-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Transfer of patients to nursing homes for end of life care is often difficult. Patients and carers express anxiety and feelings of abandonment during the process. At The Hospice of St Francis we reviewed 10 hospice discharges in order to plan the introduction of transitional support volunteers to regularly visit patients and carers following transfer. Data is presented from our review of 10 discharges to nursing homes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To identify if there are predictable /repeated issues causing distress in the transfer process.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Whether continued involvement of a &lsquo;familiar face&rsquo; would benefit a patient/carer in the transfer process.</p>
</li><li>
<p> To work in partnership with nursing homes to reduce transitional anxiety.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>We reviewed 10 discharges from The Hospice of St Francis to 5 nursing homes (Aug &lsquo;10 &ndash; March &lsquo;11). Focusing on timeliness, carer/relative involvement and stage of illness at transfer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The hypothesis is:<l type="tab"><li><p> The greater the involvement of carer/relatives the longer the transfer process</p>
</li><li>
<p> All of the patients/relatives expressed some level of anxiety with the process</p>
</li><li>
<p> For some anxiety and feelings of abandonment intensified post transfer leading to a move within days to another care setting.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The analysis of 10 discharges from the Hospice to nursing homes highlighted that both clinical and psychosocial issues contribute to transitional anxiety. Nursing home staff welcome support in addressing the psychosocial needs of people at the end of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Hospice care should not end once a person moves to a nursing home. We should focus more on reducing feelings of abandonment/loneliness for patients/carers transferred to nursing homes. The Hospice of St Francis Hospice will pilot a &lsquo;transitional volunteer service&rsquo; for 12 months from May 2011 to May 2012.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Traxler, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.174</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.174</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Challenges in the transfer of patients from hospice to nursing home: a model for future partnership]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>261</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/262-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Keep on going: providing a flexible blended learning end of life education programme]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/262-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Nursing home staff want to provide end of life care that will maintain their residents dignity, comfort and best interests in the familiar surroundings of the nursing home. Education and support is a key part of this. The Hospice of St Francis provided a mentor education programme to two care homes to facilitate them in this care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To enable the care staff to provide excellent end of life care for their residents encompassing all six steps described in the NHS National End of Life Care Programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Home 1 is a nursing home for people with learning difficulties, caring for their complex needs. Home 2 is a nursing home for people with dementia with multiple co-morbidities. A mentor is made available to support the staff through an end of life blended learning 6 module and follow-up workshop experience. An audit of patients notes before and after the programme plus staff confidence questionnaires enables evaluation of the programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Both care homes have seen an increase in their confidence and competence in care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This project is innovative because of the flexibility of methods in delivering the support and training. Home 1 worked methodically through the blended learning. They were keen and ready to do the work shop and currently are gathering/developing tools to underpin this process. Home 2 were enthusiastic beginners but were unable to work through the programme. Now the staff have made time over 2 days to receive group face to face training before going on to gather the tools/action plan they need to achieve the relevant national quality markers. The mentor made herself available to work alongside the care staff, supporting, enabling and challenging their practice through the relationship of trust and support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Blended learning using a mentor approach provides a flexible learner centred education programme.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willoughby, J., Watson, L., Gittins, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.175</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.175</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Memory disorders (psychiatry), Disability, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Keep on going: providing a flexible blended learning end of life education programme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>262</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>262</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/262-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Innovative pre and post bereavement work with children: unique ways with animals]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/262-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>Through the catalyst of &lsquo;pony experience&rsquo; bereaved children and parents are facilitated into meaningful conversations with each other and supportive relationships with other families.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Once a month bereaved children and families are invited to meet in the Hospice Woodland Walk for Pony Experience, including grooming and riding.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Commonalty of experience: participants meet other bereaved families, enabling them to share "their stories" should they wish and develop co -supportive relationships.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Children gain confidence &ndash; "Life will go on even without their loved one"</p>
</li><li>
<p> Observing other children confirms they are not alone, seeing others having fun gives permission for them to do likewise.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Walking side by side feels less intense, enabling easy conversation and ability to explore and chat at differing levels.</p>
</li><li>
<p> This informal bereavement group work is well attended with positive oral feedback. Formal evaluation underway- results pending.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p></p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Benefits</st>
<p>Children feel more at ease when handling a pet or when being "carried" by a pony. They can use the animal as distraction from uncomfortable conversations to disclose intimacies/memories that may otherwise be difficult.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Challenges</st>
<p>Gaining insurance for the pony component proved challenging but possible. Health and safety issues require stringency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Intrinsic to palliative care and bereavement support is focusing upon the little things that make a person feel respected and loved. We have launched a project that is simple in its theory, but complex and diverse in its positive outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Recommendations</st>
<p>We appeal to all Hospices to explore whether they could use pets in similar ways to support children requiring essential but difficult pre and post bereavement care. Oral presentation will include photos (consented)and interviews from users.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandes, J., James, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.176</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.176</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Innovative pre and post bereavement work with children: unique ways with animals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>262</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>262</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/262-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Documenting advance care planning in the hospice setting]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/262-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Hospice of St Francis piloted advance care planning (ACP) documentation (September 2010 &ndash; February 2011). The pilot was in four phases including a consultation group, agreement re documents to be used, staff training required, target areas and numbers (up to 10 patients per In Patient Unit, Day Care and Community Specialist Nursing team).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To establish whether there was a need for Hospice of St Francis specific ACP documentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p></p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Phases</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Multiprofessional working group to discuss, produce and pilot ACP documentation</p>
</li><li>
<p> Evaluation of pilot and amend documents</p>
</li><li>
<p> Implement amended documents over 6 months</p>
</li><li>
<p> Evaluation and re-evaluate documentation.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Documentation was implemented with two community and three day care patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Do the results reflect the need for more staff education or more confidence in using the skills and documents?</p>
</li><li>
<p> Do the results relate to the voluntariness or fragility of patients in the advance care planning process or reticence of staff to use ACP documents?</p>
</li><li>
<p> What is the impact of other ACP work in the hospice on this pilot (eg, ACP letters for patients with advanced respiratory and cardiac disease, ACP research interviews as part of a doctoral research programme).</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The ACP document pilot shed light on the process and documentation of ACP. Further work has subsequently been done to look at an ACP education model for Beds and Herts as well as ACP resources for care homes. It is important not to make assumptions about the skills and confidence of hospice staff in ACP as well as looking at the context of the patient's voluntariness and fragility. The pilot helped us look at the education needs of our staff.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell, S., Willoughby, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.177</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.177</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Drugs: cardiovascular system]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Documenting advance care planning in the hospice setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>262</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>262</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/263-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Investing in a weekly lottery - does it work?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/263-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Investing in a weekly lottery can seem like a significant financial risk for a small to medium sized hospice and paying an external canvassing company to recruit members a step too far. In this time of economic insecurity, however, Lottery continues to be a very attractive and affordable fundraising proposition for a wide range of donors and is therefore worthy of significant consideration.</p>
<p>The Myton hospices ran a lottery recruitment campaign in 2009 using an external canvassing agency &ndash; the target was to recruit 12 000 new donors over 12 months, results outlined below</p>
<p>Year 1</p>
<p>Income; &pound; 574 080, Cost; &pound; 360 000, net income; &pound; 214 000</p>
<p>Year 2</p>
<p>Income; &pound; 505 191, Cost &pound; 165 000, net income; &pound;340 191</p>
<p>Attrition</p>
<p>Year 1 = 8%, Year 2 = 12%</p>
<p>Predicted net income over 5 years = &pound; 1 450 000</p>
<p>In addition to the above the increase to the Donor database of 12 000 new names has resulted in over &pound; 50 000 in Raffle income and &pound;13 000 in donations.</p>
<p>The secret to making a campaign work is as follows;<l type="tab"><li><p> Train the external canvassers in &ndash; house and to keep them up to date</p>
</li><li>
<p> Negotiate the recruitment costs with the agency &ndash; ensuring that a 3 month "drop out "clause is built in</p>
</li><li>
<p> Ensure that recruitment costs are phased over the expected life time value of the member / donor, that is, don't pay the full costs up front but make sure that there are anniversary reviews</p>
</li><li>
<p> Build a solid business case and make sure the Trustees buy in to the campaign!</p>
</li></l></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freeman, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.178</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.178</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Investing in a weekly lottery - does it work?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>263</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>263</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/263-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Service user evaluation of the benefits of complementary therapy in hospice care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/263-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Complementary therapy (CT) is now a key component of care and support in hospice services and can be offered singly or in combination with other interventions, for example, emotional or bereavement support.</p>
<p>Service user evaluation is the best measure of effective outcome from care and support programmes.</p>
<p>The hospice offers Reflexology, Simple Massage and Reiki currently, in Day Hospice, Outpatient and Home settings.</p>
<p>The hospice introduced a self-completed user evaluation questionnaire in 2008 and has modified that to measure the benefits of combined therapies.</p>
<p>The questionnaire is offered to all CT service users after four completed therapy sessions.</p>
<p>The evaluation is structured to seek the user's views on overall benefits, length of effect and frequency of treatment to maximise quality of life.</p>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>to-date (from 54 questionnaires offered and 44 returned; a response rate of of 81%) indicate that 43% of participants felt that the therapy had offered benefits in addition to having an effect on the problem that they had initially.</p>
<p>32% of service users stated that the benefit had lasted for longer than a day.</p>
<p>77% of respondents commented on the benefits of therapy; themes were increased relaxation (47%), reduced anxiety (44%) and improved sleep (26%).</p>
<p>59% of respondents had reflexology in courses of 4&ndash;6 treatments.</p>
<p>"It helps because I feel more relaxed; sleeping is improved and my pains are not so bad"</p>
<p>Additionally, 16 questionnaires have been offered to those receiving complementary therapy in direct combination with other interventions (&lsquo;Back to Back&rsquo; therapy). In this group, 10 individual returns is a response rate of 63%. All those offered &lsquo;Back to Back&rsquo; treatments had complex needs. In commentaries, respondents remark on physical benefit, but also indicate emotional support and well-being.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hunt, J., Margaret, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.179</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.179</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Hospice, Complementary medicine, Physiotherapy, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Service user evaluation of the benefits of complementary therapy in hospice care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>263</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>263</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/263-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Providing culturally competent palliative care in Glasgow]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/263-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Glasgow's population consists of a significant number of people of South Asian origin for whom many barriers exist to accessing services. Traditional hospice services have not always been seen as acceptable to this population. In order to improve access to palliative care services, a strategic and collaborative approach within Glasgow's minority ethnic communities was required.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A steering group was established, with representation from the multidisciplinary team, local ethnic communities and community healthcare partnerships. Awareness raising events were delivered across community groups, places of worship, cultural events, festivals, and local media. A nurse led drop-in service was implemented in a Sikh Gurdwara, Hindu Mandir, Islamic Mosque and an independent community centre. The drop-in service offered confidential consultation on issues relating to illness, treatments, referrals and support to both patients and families. Participant feedback was obtained. Ethnicity data was collected and analysed on new referrals to hospice services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Public engagement events within each of the identified religious communities attracted an audience of approximately 200 at each event.</p>
<p>Volunteers from the minority ethnic population were recruited to support the promotion of the project in their local areas.</p>
<p>Local minority ethnic community elders participated in the development of a translated information booklet.</p>
<p>A small increase in referral rates from ethnic minority communities has been noted.</p>
<p>The nurse led drop-in service has been well received with an average of four consultations per session.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Relationships with minority ethnic communities were strengthened raising awareness of palliative care services. Potential misconceptions and barriers were addressed.</p>
<p>Educational initiatives have provided an understanding of cultural needs in order to provide culturally competent services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Love, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.180</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.180</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Providing culturally competent palliative care in Glasgow]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>263</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>263</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/263-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Providing a seven day community clinical nurse specialist service: a 6 month pilot]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/263-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In response to the challenges faced by patients and carers out of hours, the service provided by the Community Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) team in an inner city hospice in Scotland was extended to cover 7 days per week. While this was recommended by NICE in 2004, there is little published information around the implementation and evaluation of this service development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim of the pilot</st>
<p>To examine the need for and benefits of an enhanced 7 day service by the Community CNS team.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The team of 6.5 WTE staff piloted 7 day working for 6 months. Activity data was collected on planned and unplanned urgent contacts. Acceptability of the service to both staff and patients and families was sought.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There was an average of 5.3 urgent contacts per weekend (range 0&ndash;12). 36% of these contacts were unplanned, with the majority of these (68%) being made by a family member.</p>
<p>Key benefits were seen to be: specialist symptom management 7 days per week, supporting patient choice in place of care, emotional support to patients and families and improved team working.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Successful management of change is dependent on a number of key factors. With these in place, resistance to change was overcome and staff were both enthusiastic and willing to embrace a new way of working. To support this service development an additional 0.5 WTE member of staff was recruited.</p>
<p>Initially data was only gathered around the "unplanned urgent" contacts. The team recognised that they could also incorporate appropriate routine activity, negotiated with the patient and family.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The pilot demonstrated need, was highly acceptable to staff, patients and families and its delivery was sustainable in our team. Seven day working is now established in the delivery of our Clinical Nurse Specialist service.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grady, A., Milton, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.181</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.181</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Providing a seven day community clinical nurse specialist service: a 6 month pilot]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>263</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>264</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/264-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An evaluation of a hospice at home service: a questionnaire survey of GP & district nurse referrers]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/264-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>National recognition of services to provide end of life care and their importance has been increasing over recent years. A questionnaire survey of those referring to a trained nursing hospice at home service was completed as part of the X Hospice's service review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>According to professional referrers &ndash; does the hospice meet its objectives and provide appropriate services?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A specifically designed questionnaire was pre-tested and piloted before posting to all professional referrers. The single A4 double sided questionnaire looked at referrer satisfaction, carer/family support and patient referrals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The response rate was 72/110 (65%) but 6 referrers did not consent. 32/34 (94%) of GPs and 19/19 (100%) of District Nurses(DNs) were satisfied or very satisfied with the response time; 32/37 (87%) of GPs and 19/19 (100%) of DNs with team communication and 33/35 (94%) of GPs and 17/18 (94%) of DNs found the team to be always supportive to carers. 50/57 (88%) of referrers felt the service had enabled their patients to die at home. In the free text comments, the support, time and experience of the team were valued. The overnight on-call, night sits and team working with the DN teams were also recognised as strengths, though referrers wanted more night sit availability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The results correlate with the literature on Hospice at Home services to date. The evaluation has prompted meetings with GPs and DNs to give an update about the service. It has confirmed the value of the service within the community. The request for more night sits was deemed to be valid.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This survey demonstrated that X-Hospice at Home is highly valued by referrers and has enabled appropriate service development in line with their feedback.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blanchard, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.182</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.182</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An evaluation of a hospice at home service: a questionnaire survey of GP & district nurse referrers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>264</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>264</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/264-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Establishing a patient self-administration scheme for medicines in the hospice setting]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/264-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Self administration of medicines has been an area of nursing and pharmacy development. Literature reports have shown that it is feasible, provided appropriate checks are in place and that these happen on a regular basis. Implementation can maintain the patient's independence which is important in the respite setting. It also provides a valuable opportunity to explore adherence where this may be a problem and which could prevent unnecessary admission and the patient being denied the opportunity to be cared for in the place of their choice. Self-administration of high risk drugs such as opioids is an area where further work is required so that inclusion in self-administration schemes is risk-assured and possible.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To establish a framework that facilitates patient self-administration while minimising patient risk.</p>
<p>To further inform governance priorities for self-administration schemes particularly those involving high risk drugs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A multidisciplinary team was formed representing pharmacy, doctors and nurses in order to develop a clinical protocol. Incident surveillance data was used alongside consensus opinion to identify critical stages along the medicines trail and the appropriate control measures to risk manage them.</p>
<p>The protocol manages screening for patient eligibility, consent, monitoring and subsequent management of patients suitable for self-administration. Staff eligibility to undertake this protocol is granted following workshop attendance and completion of evidence-based competencies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results and discussion</st>
<p>In order to quality-assure the scheme protocol compliance will be audited on a regular basis, results of which will be assessed against incident surveillance data. This will provide ongoing risk management and identify areas for improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Trinity hospice has approved this protocol. Staff eligible to undertake a role have been accredited to do so. Under the terms of the hospice's approval an audit of compliance and critical risk assessment will inform the further development of this medicine system.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crowther, J., Wanklyn, S., Johnston, M., Skinner, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.183</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.183</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Screening (epidemiology), Guidelines, Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Establishing a patient self-administration scheme for medicines in the hospice setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>264</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>264</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/264-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A 3 month pilot of the distress thermometer within community specialist palliative care services]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/264-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Distress Thermometer (DT) as a brief holistic screening and assessment tool has been introduced, validated and widely adopted within Oncology Services and cancer networks internationally. Supportive and palliative care guidance recommends the use of a screening tool to identify and signpost appropriate services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To modify the existing distress thermometer to fit hospice and palliative care needs, and pilot within specialist community palliative care services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A working party of individuals providing nursing, emotional, psychological and spiritual support within the specialist palliative care service formed to amend the DT to fit the needs of community palliative patients. The tool was piloted by two community clinical nurse specialists (CCNS) and qualitative information collated regarding the tools appropriateness. Furthermore both qualitative patient and nurse experience was considered. Patient demographic and illness information was gathered as a possible variable influencing appropriateness of use. Finally DT training was delivered to all hospice inpatient health professionals and evaluations collected regarding the appropriateness of the DT's use with new inpatient admissions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 63 new referrals to two CCNS, 21 completed the tool. No age / malignant versus Non-malignant difference in those able/willing to complete the tool were identified. Qualitative experiential information supported the use of the tool within the community setting. Difficulties with usability were identified from both perspectives. Training evaluations were favourable with inpatient staff recommending the DT's use as part of the hospice admission process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>There are relative benefits and drawbacks of adopting this tool from both patient and nurse perspectives. However, the modified DT appeared to meet service needs. The training format and evaluations will be discussed in detail.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Both pilot and training feedback supports the use of the DT within this palliative care service.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.184</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.184</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Screening (oncology), Hospice, Screening (epidemiology), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A 3 month pilot of the distress thermometer within community specialist palliative care services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>264</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>265</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/265-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Setting up a community interest company alongside a hospice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/265-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The presentation will describe the setting up of a Community Interest Company alongside a Hospice.</p>
<p>We aimed to set up a Community Interest Company to explore a potential new income stream. The CIC also provided the opportunity to deliver projects that were complementary to our core purpose but without overt investment from the Hospice.</p>
<p>We took various projects, such as a schools bereavement link project (offering advice, training to school staff and support for children facing serious illness or bereavement), which had grown beyond the remit and capacity of the Hospice Counselling Services into the Community Interest Company so that these services were available locally to be bought in.</p>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Many local schools are making service level agreements with the CIC and requesting that we develop services, such as group work for children affected by loss.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Building partnerships locally has increased opportunities for the Hospice fundraising department.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Volunteer counsellors now have opportunities for progression- this has improved recruitment and retention.</p>
</li><li>
<p> We are building resilience and awareness of response to loss in the local community; the people benefiting from the projects are the patients, carers and relatives that will access the Hospice in the future.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Managing the change with a new initiative and communicating the potential benefits across the Hospice has taken time.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Keeping partner organisations on board as the project transferred to the CIC has been important, as has communicating the relationship between the Hospice and CIC.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>While Hospices are specialists in bereavement care the skill set that comes with supporting people emotionally is transferable to many situations and expertise in loss, Hospice values and approach is welcomed within other organisations.</p>
<p>Our experience will be of interest to any Hospice considering setting up a Community Interest Company as a potential income stream.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clitherow, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.185</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.185</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Setting up a community interest company alongside a hospice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>265</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>265</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/265-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The resilience programme for staff & volunteers]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/265-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This Hospice recognises the benefits of fostering resilience in its workforce so that we become more effective in delivering compassionate care on the journey towards the end of life.</p>
<p>The lead counsellor, responsible for co-ordinating staff and volunteer support and training in self care, took formal and informal opportunities to explore the concept of resilience with staff and volunteers. Ideas about resilience and factors within the organisation that undermine resilience were collated following focus group style sessions. This was combined with a review of the literature concerning resilience.</p>
<p>A model was developed together with a questionnaire and training programme that would enable staff and volunteers to explore and develop their levels of resilience. The model considers the emotional, psychological, physical and spiritual aspects of resilience and encourages individuals to explore how their identity, patterns of communication and personal values impact on resilience. The model holds different aspects of resilience in tension such as realism and hope. The training programme includes exercises that support the development of resilient responses to difficult situations. It considers communication and relationships.</p>
<p>4 cohorts of staff and volunteers, totalling 30 individuals, have now accessed the programme and evaluation has shown that they consider themselves better prepared to cope with the nature of their work and better prepared for the change and loss that might lie ahead in their own lives. They reported greater understanding of how they might foster resilience in the patients, carers and families that they work with.</p>
<p>We are keen to present a poster to share good practice in the area of staff support and personal development with other Hospices. Sharing our learning would also provide the opportunity to gain feedback from other Hospices, strengthening the model and programme.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clitherow, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.186</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.186</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The resilience programme for staff & volunteers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>265</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>265</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/265-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A model of care in a children's hospice - report on an independent evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/265-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper reports on a Department of Health funded independent evaluation of a Children's Hospice service model. Over 150 stakeholders; hospice staff, representatives from external agencies, children, young people and families; acted as participants. The findings and recommendations are widely applicable in children's hospice care, identifying issues of international relevance.</p>
<p>A mixed methods approach was adopted, involving focus groups with family members and hospice staff, individual face-to-face or telephone interviews with family members, hospice staff and external staff and a web-based survey for parents. Topics covered included participants' perceptions of the service model and the provision of care, the use of assessment and outcome measures, and the current and potential use of emerging technologies within hospice care. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic coding.</p>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Perceptions of the model were inconsistent: some respondents viewed the intent of the model positively but had concerns about its achievement in practice. Tensions between teams and the impact of end of life care on respite were identified as concerns. Families reported high levels of satisfaction with care, but the impact of late postponement or cancellation of respite care was a potentially serious problem. Transition to adult services was viewed as increasingly important as life expectancies increase.</p>
<p>The evaluation of individual care episodes, rather than overall service provision, did not appear to be undertaken systematically. While emerging technologies have the potential to impact positively on care, their adoption was seldom noted by participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key recommendations</st>
<p>Revision of internal communication systems, to improve links between hospice centres, and between professional groups and teams; clearer definition of the model of service; evaluation of potential uses of emerging technologies and a review of the impact of end of life care on respite would all be of benefit to the effectiveness of care delivery.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lindsay, B., Crozier, K., Leeson, J., Wray, J., Andrews, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.187</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.187</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A model of care in a children's hospice - report on an independent evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>265</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>266</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/266-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An independent evaluation of a neonatal end of life care pathway]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/266-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The neonatal end of life care pathway, implemented in 2008, provides a coordinated planning approach for rapid discharge of babies from Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) to hospice or home for end of life care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The evaluation aimed to assess the effectiveness of the neonatal pathway from families' and staff perspectives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>To ensure the evaluation drew on a spread of voices, we recruited participants who had used and provided care pathway. Eight families, 10 internal and 10 external staff were interviewed using a guided conversation technique. Thematic analysis was undertaken and data was further clustered into subthemes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>42 babies have been referred on the pathway since 2008. Staff and parents expressed a supportive view of the pathway and demonstrated an appreciation for the underlying principles. There is a need for wider understanding of the pathway and care it offers. Bereavement support for families evaluated very well but needs of fathers could be further investigated. The impact on other aspects of hospice activity emerged.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The pathway is an innovative service, probably the first in the UK. It represents an increase in service activity of the hospice and contributes to the breadth of service on offer. The experiences of staff and parents outlined in this evaluation should be useful in contributing to the knowledge base about end of life care for very young babies. The knowledge and expertise of staff who have developed and worked with this pathway over the last 3 years should be acknowledged and the model disseminated widely.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Recommendations</st>
<p>More regular training opportunities for staff of all levels should focus on case studies rather than simply pathway documentation. Further consideration should be given to managing the demands of respite care when bereaved families are resident. Joint meetings should be used to anticipate and plan.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crozier, K., Lindsay, B., Wray, J., Leeson, J., Andrews, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.188</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.188</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Neonatal and paediatric intensive care, End of life decisions (palliative care), Neonatal intensive care, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An independent evaluation of a neonatal end of life care pathway]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>266</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/266-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Talking about dying and death]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/266-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This presentation will report on research commissioned by a hospice in England and work done to promote meaningful discussion about this sensitive topic. Since 2008, the hospice has run a series of events to encourage people to be more open. Two panel discussions have been held, entitled &lsquo;Dying &amp; Death: Let&rsquo;s Talk about It', which have resulted in good attendance and constructive dialogue. In addition, the local university was commissioned to identify perceptions surrounding talking about dying and death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Focus groups</st>
<p>Two focus groups explored viewpoints from the general public and practitioners. The focus group sessions were facilitated, audio-recorded, transcribed, coded and analysed by researchers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Panel discussion</st>
<p>The panels consisted of people such as writers, poets, academics, vicars, medical consultants and journalists; the audience was invited to ask questions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four conceptual themes were identified from the focus groups:<l type="tab"><li><p> Emotions, beliefs and behaviours</p>
</li><li>
<p> Coping with adversity</p>
</li><li>
<p> Difficulties, barriers and tensions</p>
</li><li>
<p> Fostering a participative future.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The panel discussions produced dialogue around issues such as the role of religion in death, what constitutes a good death and euthanasia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A lack of openness together with a &lsquo;live forever&rsquo; mindset contributed to a cultural shift where the inevitable isn't discussed; which hinders advance care planning and adversely affects the grieving process. Dying and death was articulated as an upsetting and taboo topic. Some practitioners take the view that they "do not want to upset patients" and choose avoidance, while others are drawn to talking as an integral aspect of their role. Dying people often want the opportunity to talk through their wishes, though such discussions with the &lsquo;general public&rsquo; can be more problematic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Recommendations</st>
<p>Hospices are advocated to address the need for more outreach events in the community and wider education and training for all.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirshbaum, M., Carey, I., Conrad, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.189</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.189</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Assisted dying, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Talking about dying and death]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>266</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/266-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Collaboration in education to meet the QIPP agenda: an innovative consortium approach]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/266-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In early 2011 three established hospices in the South West went beyond the rhetoric. They agreed to work in formal collaboration to address the education needs of their own, and external, clinical and non-clinical staff. A discussion paper was written drawing from the literature of both industry and education. A meeting of key stakeholders in March 2011 agreed a 6&ndash;12 month lead in time to the formation of an education consortium.</p>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To establish a gold standard for equitable and transferrable EOLC education for clinical and non-clinical staff</p>
</li><li>
<p> To meet the QIPP agenda with economies of scale</p>
</li><li>
<p> To remove the element of competition and enable a united approach to future income generation.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Initial honest transparent discussion to consider four functional areas of the consortium: ownership, leadership, membership and partnership</p>
</li><li>
<p> This informed the governance structure and roles and functions of the staff</p>
</li><li>
<p> A letter of intent was signed by each stakeholder organisation</p>
</li><li>
<p> It was agreed that the consortium would be seen as part of each organisation and not an external entity</p>
</li><li>
<p> A work plan was agreed.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The mapping process has begun to look at resources in each stakeholder organisation: business development expertise, IT resources and systems, human resources and their capacity as well as the existing education programmes and their current delivery format.</p>
<p>The work of the consortium is in its infancy. In all senses it is a learning organisation as we explore this new approach to sustainable delivery of appropriate End of Life education. The outcome and discussion will be rich by September 2011 and will focus on both the joys and challenges of this work.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walford, C., Hewitt, C., Gibbons, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.190</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.190</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Collaboration in education to meet the QIPP agenda: an innovative consortium approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>267</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/267-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Creating a sustainable high quality hospicecare service]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/267-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Demographics, increased patient aspirations for choice of type of care and our potential funding base, mean our current monolithic service structure and business model, which we share with many other hospices, is not sustainable. The project is to create a coherent service and financial system which will deliver high quality care to all who need it and be affordable in an uncertain future.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To understand what patient determined high quality outcomes are</p>
</li><li>
<p> To reconfigure services to be able to deliver these outcomes</p>
</li><li>
<p> To improve integrated working internally and with external agencies</p>
</li><li>
<p> To be able to measure cost effectiveness in service delivery</p>
</li><li>
<p> To increase our financial autonomy</p>
</li><li>
<p> To develop new income streams.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Researching patient determined quality outcomes</p>
</li><li>
<p> Challenging assumptions about existing, and exploring alternative, service delivery systems</p>
</li><li>
<p> Consultation with staff about the requirements of different systems</p>
</li><li>
<p> Developing sharper costing mechanisms to allow measurement of effectiveness in service delivery</p>
</li><li>
<p> Development of financial modelling and sensitivity analysis to allow differential decision- making about investment.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A reconfigured integrated service delivery structure based on delivering the right person in the right place at the right time with the right skills to meet patients needs.</p>
<p>A business turnaround programme to create sustainable flows of income and expenditure into the future.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The planned change involves structure, training development and financial remodelling but above all the cultural change required to put patient care and patient choice genuinely at the heart of service provision. The implementation has a 5 year timeline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Many other hospices face the challenge of maintaining quality while facing rising demand and uncertain income streams. This presentation shows a possible way ahead and the issues which may arise.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.191</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.191</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Health policy, Health economics, Health service research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Creating a sustainable high quality hospicecare service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>267</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/267-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enterprise initiatives: to boldly go.......]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/267-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The role of enterprise in the charity sector is increasingly that of entrepreneur. As the down turn in the economic climate reached the high street so did the realisation that traditional routes of income generation could no longer sustain current patient care provision, nor give scope for future planning and direction.</p>
<p>It was agreed that this was not purely a challenge to the enterprise and income generation team. As an organisation we needed to prioritised time to work together to find fresh ground for innovative and creative income generating opportunities.</p>
<p>An enterprise committee was set up to report to the Board. This is chaired by Chairman of the Trust and consists of Trustees, Fundraising and Retail Directors and income generation staff. The outcome from this united approach is still unfolding.</p>
<p>Key new ideas that the income generation team have taken forward to date include:<l type="tab"><li><p> Sourcing sponsorship for our web pages</p>
</li><li>
<p> A sponsored DVD about the hospice running in our charity shops</p>
</li><li>
<p> Local businesses being approached to include us on their on- line sales as a charity of choice for their customers at a suggested donation of &pound;1 per transaction.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Major investment of time to sell items on Ebay.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>A further outcome from this work is a series of dedicated &lsquo;blue sky&rsquo; thinking events. Benefits have included a further integration of the various work strands in the organisation and sense of unity as we "boldly go......." into the forecasted austerity ahead.</p>
<p>This paper will give an honest presentation of the challenges we have faced and share some of the successes and lessons learned along this journey.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nickinson, C., Walford, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.192</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.192</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enterprise initiatives: to boldly go.......]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>267</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/267-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating an adapted mindfulness meditation course for use in palliative care setting]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/267-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Mindfulness Meditation involves paying attention to our mind and body moment by moment, being aware of what arises without judgement.</p>
<p>Experience and evaluation demonstrated that some patients receiving one to one mindfulness meditation failed to achieve their identified goals due to difficulty in committing to regular meditation practice when at home. They felt the traditional framework of the 8 week course would be to onerous.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To ascertain patient / carer experiences of attending a 4 week course of 1 h structured, group mindfulness meditation sessions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Patients and their carers referred for meditation practice were invited to attend four 1 h weekly structured group mindfulness meditation sessions. Each attendee was requested to complete a Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing questionnaire prior to first attendance and again following the final session.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>2 groups, each consisting of 3 patients and their carers attended. Regular attendance and goals were achieved, as was regular and committed practice at home. They valued the mutual support from other attendees, the positive sharing of experiences &ndash; including the challenges of practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The results demonstrate that the 4 session course fulfilled patient identified outcomes and was felt by attendees not to be too onerous.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Running a course over a number of weeks which requires regular attendance by patients can be a challenge in palliative care settings. My experience suggests that it is possible to cover the essence of Mindfulness Meditation in 4 sessions.</p>
<p>Future studies could compare outcomes of an 8 week and 4 week course.</p>
<p>Future practice could consider: introductory Mindfulness Meditation days; and regular meditation drop-in sessions to support regular home practice.</p>
<p>Knowing of sessions for patients enhances staff awareness and interest in the process of Mindfulness Meditation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baines, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.193</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.193</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Complementary medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating an adapted mindfulness meditation course for use in palliative care setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>268</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/268-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Why carry a file or pick up a pen? All our records are paperless!]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/268-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Our three services, inpatient, community and day care had separate notes and records for the same patients. We agreed to create a joint approach to assessment and an integrated record that could be viewed in real time at any site. Access over N3 enables us to interact with our GP practices, community hospitals and access records and imaging results in real time.</p>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>In late 2006 we set the goal to be paperless within 3 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Discussion with Crosscare and many meetings to gain mutual understanding of possible problems in implementation</p>
</li><li>
<p> A pilot with the community team was started, for a year, to test the design</p>
</li><li>
<p> Roll out across our service to follow within the next 6 months</p>
</li><li>
<p> Close liaison and feedback on the project to Crosscare team enabled us to problem solve and keep to our timescale.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> We are now paperless apart from electronic prescribing; this has taken slightly longer due to logistics</p>
</li><li>
<p> We are now exploring connections with other healthcare agencies and partners in care.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Advantage of staff being able to see a patient record in real time and review it</p>
</li><li>
<p> Uniform inputting by staff is quicker and more accurate</p>
</li><li>
<p> We expect to develop better partnerships through closer interaction with GP practices and other community hospitals</p>
</li><li>
<p> With access over N3 the expected norm is to easily see test results, imaging and consultants letters etc</p>
</li><li>
<p> The audit trail tracks all alterations and so covers us for legal issues.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This work is imperative as the organisation looks to improve interdisciplinary communication and patient care. The organisation is currently reconfiguring and expanding to the North of Dorset. As such Crosscare will compliment the planned video conferencie facilities in North, Central and South Dorset.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Higgs, J., Walford, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.194</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.194</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Information management]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Why carry a file or pick up a pen? All our records are paperless!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>268</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/268-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breakthrough medication and implications for practice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/268-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>An exercise which started out as an aide memoir for medication administration/documentation was recognised and adapted to become an audit tool to measure the amount of breakthrough medications given. It was recognised that administering these medications takes a huge amount of time on a daily basis and so has other implications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The purpose of this presentation is to highlight the issues surrounding breakthrough medication needs of patients in a hospice inpatient unit. This will highlight issues surrounding symptom control, drug rounds as well as quantifying a huge part of the nursing role making it easier to measure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Staff document every breakthrough drug given over a 24 period, this includes the type of drug, time given and number of inpatients. Data it is divided in to 4 h blocks to give a clearer picture of when breakthrough medication is needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A snapshot comparison between January 2010 and January 2011 is given. Although the results demonstrate a correlation between the number of patients and number of breakthroughs given, other patterns have emerged. Most breakthroughs consistently occurred between 10:00 and 14:00, the least between 02:00 and 06:00. Total number for January 2010 was 617, for January 2011 745. This on average equates to around 227 h of nursing time over the 2 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The amount of breakthrough medications given is huge, the impact of which on patients is difficult to measure. Specific times when breakthrough needs are greater have been assessed and the morning drug round time changed. This has been helpful to quantify a complex part of the nursing role which may be helpful particularly to non-clinicians.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Recommendations</st>
<p>Further studies are recommended to include more detailed analysis of specific data. Suggestions are specific symptoms, methods of administration, effectiveness of end of life care, prescribing and implications for staff.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wright, A., Tague, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.195</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.195</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breakthrough medication and implications for practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>268</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/268-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[e- ELCA, from the beginning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/268-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of the presentation is to highlight innovation in practice with regards how the end of life care for all e-learning programme was implemented and integrated within a hospice. Key concepts include the introduction of e- learning to the clinical staff as a way of learning. How then could this programme be integrated into the working day and how best to monitor the progress of that integration.</p>
<p>The issues were around availability of facilities, such as IT equipment. The varying levels of ability of the staff using the computers, and how those who were less confident could be supported. The ability of staff being released from clinical practice to complete sessions, and which of the sessions available were the most pertinent to each staff group.</p>
<p>Staff were introduced to the programme and its concepts. Extra IT equipment was ordered with two rooms being made into e-learning suites. While this was occuring i accessed the modules and mapped out which modules each staff group would be required to complete. This would ensure that staff completed modules which were most pertinent to their role. Each staff member was given their own folders and workbooks, with step by step guidance of how to negotiate the site. Managers allocated specific time away from the clinical environment and time was spent with staff who felt less confident with e-learning as a way of learning.</p>
<p>Staff continue to learn on a rolling programme, and some have completed all of the necessary modules. Staff report that they find this way of learning flexible and are able to utilise the knowledge back in practice. That they value the time away from clinical practice and the relevance of the topic areas to the delivery palliative and end of life care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Owens, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.196</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.196</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[e- ELCA, from the beginning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>269</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/269-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving practice through audit: administration of blood transfusions within a hospice setting]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/269-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The cause of anaemia in palliative care patients is often multifactorial. Symptom burden is important when deciding whether to transfuse or not. Although formal consent for transfusion of blood products is not legally required, it is good clinical practice to inform the patient of potential risks and benefits. Following the Safer Practice Notice 14 "Right patient, right blood" in November 2006, national competencies for clinical staff involved in blood transfusions were introduced. The hospice decided to look at the blood transfusion process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To assess whether aspects of the blood transfusion process were adequately documented, including consent, provision of patient information leaflets, symptomatic benefit following blood transfusion and decisions regarding the appropriateness of future blood transfusions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Retrospective audit of patients receiving a blood transfusion within the inpatient unit or day hospice, against hospice standards. Data collected included demographics, haemoglobin (Hb) and symptoms pre-transfusion, blood prescription details, documentation of consent and decisions about whether future transfusions would be appropriate. Initial data collection period June to November 2007. A blood transfusion proforma was developed and introduced. Repeat data collection period April to September 2010.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A comparable number of blood transfusions were given in each period. Documentation of informed consent improved from 4% to 81% transfusions. Use of information leaflets increased from 0% to 29% transfusions. The number of transfusions that symptoms were not documented was reduced from 62% to 10%. Fatigue was the most common symptom reported in each cycle. Documentation of decisions about whether future transfusions were appropriate improved from 17% to 24%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The proforma has improved the documentation of symptoms, consent and use of information leaflets. Further improvement is needed in other areas. This will be achieved through dissemination of audit results, adjustments to current proforma and staff education. A re-audit is planned for the future.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Waddell, J., Hodgson, A., Wiseman, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.197</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.197</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Haematology (incl blood transfusion), Hospice, Informed consent, Legal and forensic medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving practice through audit: administration of blood transfusions within a hospice setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>269</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>269</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/269-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study of patients known to a hospice service: hospital versus home deaths]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/269-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>It is well recognised that most patients state a preference to die at home, yet the majority die in hospital. If the proportion of home deaths is to be increased it is important to understand the reasons why this is not being achieved currently.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>We sought to:<l type="tab"><li><p> Identify any differences between patients known to hospice services dying in hospital or at home</p>
</li><li>
<p> Identify gaps in service provision</p>
</li><li>
<p> Identify &lsquo;predictors&rsquo; of hospital admission.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Comparison of 2 groups of 49 patients, one group dying in the local hospital and the other at home within the period October 2009 &ndash; April 2010</p>
</li><li>
<p> Patients were identified from the Hospice database</p>
</li><li>
<p> Data collected included demographic characteristics, services involved, family support, and knowledge of of the patients' preferred place of care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Questionnaires were completed by the Hospice Palliative Care Nurse Specialists</p>
</li><li>
<p> Hospital notes were checked</p>
</li><li>
<p> Supplementary information was obtained from GP practices, the Primary Care Trust and Hospice records.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Most hospital admissions were precipitated by a sudden deterioration of an existing condition or an acute episode</p>
</li><li>
<p> There were slight demographic differences between the two groups, with elderly females living alone being the most likely to die in hospital</p>
</li><li>
<p> Hospice and community services seemed less actively involved with the patients who died in hospital.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> The majority of patients dying in hospital seemed to have a more rapid terminal decline, with a potentially treatable cause, than those dying at home.</p>
</li><li>
<p> No factors were identified that could have prevented these admissions but timely access to Hospice beds could have prevented a few patients dying in hospital.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parr, A., Hodgson, A., Duddle, C., Carby, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.198</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.198</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study of patients known to a hospice service: hospital versus home deaths]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>269</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>269</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/269-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The multiprofessional toolkit - improving communication about patient choices for care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/269-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Quality patient care and family support depends on sharing information between patients and healthcare professionals. However, the number of settings where palliative care is provided may form a barrier to effective communication.</p>
<p>Technologically advanced countries have been developing electronic patient records to enable access to information by all healthcare providers. I.T. is expensive, relying on professionals to keep records up to date and ensure confidentiality.</p>
<p>Our patients living with life limiting illnesses could not wait for the development of databases.</p>
<p>A paper booklet called the Multiprofessional Toolkit was designed so that patients take ownership of their health information. They ask any healthcare workers they meet to make entries in their booklet to keep it up to date. It enables problems to be managed according to the patient's wishes.</p>
<sec><st>Methodology</st>
<p>A coordinator interviewed patients and professionals from the hospice, the hospital, the primary care trust and macmillan nurses. The pilot survey guided the design of the booklet, its content and user friendly design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The coordinator developed the toolkit. This formed a patient held record, which as a communication tool helps staff dicuss life limiting illnesses with patients and families. Patients relate the story of their illness and record it in their toolkit, reassured that professionals may understand more clearly what their priorities of care might be.</p>
<p>It includes relevant medical information. Patients find this makes consultations easier as information does not have to be remembered burt simply read from the toolkit. Patients record changes in their views whenever they wish.</p>
<p>Samples of the toolkit were distributed among user groups, with a feedback questionnaire. Data collected demonstrated approval for the project.</p>
<p>It has now been printed and staff training undertaken.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Audit demonstrated very quickly, cheaply and effectively improved communication. It could be adapted for other countries too.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tapley, M., Cerdeira, M., Cardoso, A., Vallantine, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.199</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.199</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, General practice / family medicine, Hospice, Confidentiality, Legal and forensic medicine, Health promotion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The multiprofessional toolkit - improving communication about patient choices for care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>269</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>270</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/270-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sign on the dotted line: opioid agreements in patients with a history of substance misuse]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/270-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The management of pain in palliative care patients with a history of substance misuse can be challenging. Patients may have a low pain threshold, feel ill at ease in unfamiliar clinical environments and consequently compliance can be poor. Doctors may feel ill at ease prescribing opioids due to fears of exacerbating the addiction or contributing to overdose. Following a regional audit of the management of this patients group, regional guidelines were developed recognising the importance of close working between disciplines and the use of opioid agreements. The development of opioid agreements with patients can improve compliance and quality of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>A reflection on our experiences introducing verbal and written opioid agreements within the palliative care setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Opioid agreements were utilised with two patients with cancer pain and a coexistent history of substance misuse, in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Written and verbal contracts were used detailing expectations of the patient, role of healthcare physicians, and the plan of care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The staff observed improvement in compliance with medication, relationships with staff members and symptom control. The agreements facilitated communication between the hospice, primary care, community pharmacy, and the addiction team.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Introducing opioid contracts to this group of complex patients<l type="tab"><li><p> Set clear boundaries for the patient and staff involved in their care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Improved compliance and consequently relationships between patients and staff</p>
</li><li>
<p> Empowered patients to take responsibility for their own analgesic management</p>
</li><li>
<p> Facilitated clear communication between the numerous healthcare professionals involved in the patients care.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>We feel that the use of opioid agreements with patients with a history of substance misuse has improved the patient experience.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finnegan, C., Brown, S., Coackley, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.200</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.200</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, General practice / family medicine, Pain (neurology), Stroke, Hospice, Pain (palliative care), Drug misuse (including addiction), Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Poisoning, Occupational and environmental medicine, Health education, Health promotion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sign on the dotted line: opioid agreements in patients with a history of substance misuse]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>270</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/270-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing an end of life care community forum]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/270-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Embedding end of life care in nursing homes is not sustainable on education packages alone. Evidence shows us that ongoing clinical support needs to be provided if change is to be sustained. The development of a dedicated End of Life Care Community Forum was felt to be a model that could address this issue.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To enable networking and opportunity for care homes to meet for support with end of life care issues</p>
</li><li>
<p> To improve end of life care delivery in care homes and assist people to die in the place of their choice reducing hospital admissions at the end of life</p>
</li><li>
<p> To establish End of Life Care Champions.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Scoping exercise</p>
</li><li>
<p> Senior staff at the Hospice Chair and co-ordinate meetings</p>
</li><li>
<p> Engagement with Advance Care Planning Teams (Community)</p>
</li><li>
<p> Funding at Network Level to support roll out.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Care of residents and staff morale increased</p>
</li><li>
<p> Reduced admissions to hospital for end of life care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Heightened awareness of End of Life Care Strategy with an increase in the use of end of life tools</p>
</li><li>
<p> Electronic communication systems and links to 24/7 telephone advice have been enhanced.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Has provided opportunity for improvements in the patients pathway with shared learning between nursing home and specialist palliative care services</p>
</li><li>
<p> Staff are empowered to utilise end of life care tools in supporting patients to die in their preferred place of care</p>
</li><li>
<p> Requires commitment from all service providers and a level of funding from the local ICN.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Recommendations</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> All nursing homes providing end of life care become active members of the Forum as part of any contracts via Commissioners in line with Quality Markers</p>
</li><li>
<p> Consider widening the remit to other service providers where end of life care is offered.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haywood, C., Littlewood, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.201</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.201</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing an end of life care community forum]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>270</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/270-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introducing the accufuser: a new solution for ambulatory continuous epidural infusion]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/270-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Epidural analgesia is useful for some patients with refractory cancer pain. However delivering a continuous epidural infusion can raise some challenges regarding safety and practicality. We present our experience of using the Accufuser Elastomeric Vacuum pump.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To identify a delivery method for continuous epidural infusion for ambulatory patients in the Hospice and Community setting.</p>
</li><li>
<p> To develop policies and procedures and facilitate staff training.</p>
</li><li>
<p> To facilitate discharge of ambulatory patients with continuous epidural infusions.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The Integrated Pain service performs joint consultations and has monthly meetings to develop Policies and Procedures and discuss complex cases. In response to patient need we performed a literature review to select a device that was portable, light, easy to fill, has long duration of action and was safe. We met with the manufacturer to evaluate it fully prior to use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>The Accufuser is an elastomeric device delivering a near linear infusion with a patented piston preventing under or over dosing. It has variable infusion rates and volumes. It is filled aseptically in the hospital pharmacy in the aseptic unit and we used a device which lasts 5.7 days. It was used for a patient with severe perineal pain despite maximal tolerated oral therapy who had benefitted from bolus epidural analgesia. Following titration of diamorphine, clonidine and levobupivacaine the patient was discharged and returned to the hospice for renewal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Introduction of the accufuser required an integrated approach from the Pain team, Pharmacy and the Specialist Palliative Care Team. Development of a policy and patient leaflets alongside intensive staff training was required. We feel this is innovative practice and opens up the choices for Units and Pain teams dealing with Epidural infusions. This device is unique in its mechanism and patented technology and offers a better patient experience.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thompson, A., Barton, G., Coackley, A., Finnegan, C., Hyland, C., Levshenkov, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.202</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.202</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Hospice, Pain (palliative care), Pain (anaesthesia)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introducing the accufuser: a new solution for ambulatory continuous epidural infusion]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>271</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/271-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Meeting the need of general practitioners for palliative care education]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/271-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The care of patients with advanced illness is now shifting into the community setting. As a result general practitioners will provide the majority of care for these patients but often lack the confidence and experience to deal with increasingly complex problems. Local GPs identified the need for education in palliative care. However workload can make the provision of education in an acceptable format with good attendance can be a challenge.</p>
<p>The aim of this educational initiative was to offer an up to date, relevant and enjoyable course for doctors which improved knowledge, developed skills and influenced practice. The format was also designed to develop closer working relationships between specialists and generalists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method of delivery</st>
<p>A survey was conducted among local doctors asking for opinions on the need for palliative care education and optimum methods of delivery. The resulting education course was delivered by specialist palliative care professionals one evening a month for 6 months. Each session focused on a different aspect of symptom control and included pain, vomiting, emergencies, agitation, depression/anxiety/dyspnoea. A seminar was followed by small group workshops for case discussion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>42 doctors registered for the course and 75% attended all 6 sessions. There was evaluation of individual sessions and the course as whole. Results for relevance and appropriateness were excellent. Each session influenced practice for the majority of delegates and fully met the expectations of the participants. The course allowed extensive networking and has resulted in closer working relationships.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>There is a demand for education in symptom control among generalists working in the community. Traditional ways of delivering education can be extremely successful in terms of acceptability and impact. Consultation with local practitioners is key in providing a successful education initiative.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coackley, A., Powell, P., Thompson, A., Clare, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.203</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.203</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Pain (neurology), Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Meeting the need of general practitioners for palliative care education]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>271</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/271-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing treatment dose errors with low molecular weight heparins]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/271-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Cancer patients have a 1 in 200 risk of a venous thromboembolic event, which is five times higher than the general population. Low molecular weight heparins are used in the treatment of venous thrombo-embolism but a patient weight calculation is required to determine the correct dose. Incorrect weight estimations can lead to serious adverse effects. In general hospices do not have ways of accurately assessing patient weight.</p>
<p>Recent guidance from the National Patient Safety Agency has specified guidelines on treatment.</p>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To assess hospice compliance with recommendations from the NPSA.</p>
<p>To initiate appropriate changes in clinical practice relating to prescribing of LMWH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Retrospective audit of clinical records of patients who were on treatment for venous thrombo-embolic disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> 5/6 patients with venous thrombo-embolic disease were anticoagulated</p>
</li><li>
<p> 0 patients were weighed prior to treatment</p>
</li><li>
<p> Limited use of biochemical screening prior to treatment</p>
</li><li>
<p> Incomplete documentation/communication to other healthcare professionals.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> If weighing equipment not available other methods of assessing patient weight are required</p>
</li><li>
<p> Essential information should be documented and communicated when patient care transferred to another setting</p>
</li><li>
<p> Discussion of the pros and cons of anticoagulation should be part of routine care for all patients.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Need for education for all hospice staff</p>
</li><li>
<p> Review of documentation used</p>
</li><li>
<p> Need for reaudit within 6 months.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campbell, C., Coackley, A., Thompson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.204</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.204</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Drugs: cardiovascular system, Stroke, Screening (oncology), Screening (epidemiology), Medical error/ patient safety, Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing treatment dose errors with low molecular weight heparins]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>271</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/271-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk register: an integrated governance approach]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/271-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>While risk management is an integral component of high quality care it can be difficult to demonstrate effectiveness. A key aim of the Hospice Business Plan was to devise and develop a Risk Register that could incorporate Fundraising and Clinical activities as part of an Integrated Governance Framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> To produce a Risk Register to identify areas and work practices most at risk</p>
</li><li>
<p> To implement a Risk Register to minimise risks that could affect the running of the Hospice</p>
</li><li>
<p> To use a Risk Register to monitor effectiveness of actions/initiatives.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Literature review</p>
</li><li>
<p> Risk Matrix</p>
</li><li>
<p> Risk scoring process</p>
</li><li>
<p> Audit cycle.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Example</st>
<p>Risk Date Governance</p>
<p>Area Description of</p>
<p>Risk concern</p>
<p>(x,y,z) Potential Impact including current controls Risk Score</p>
<p>(Pre) Risk control processes to reduce or transfer risk</p>
<p>Date for completion Risk Score</p>
<p>(Post) Likelihood rating Impact rating RISK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Clinical effectiveness</st>
<p>Administration of bisphosphonate infusions without adequate checks causing harm</p>
<p>Patient condition compromised</p>
<p>Develop hospice policy on bisphosphonate infusions with flow chart</p>
<p>Training and education for nursing and medical staff</p>
<p>Distribution of new regional audit guidelines</p>
<p>Audit to check on process</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Organisational risks were identified and scored using likelihood and impact ratings</p>
</li><li>
<p> Risks were categorised into seven key themes</p>
</li><li>
<p> Potential impact including current controls were described</p>
</li><li>
<p> Risk control processes to reduce/transfer risk were shown for each individual risk</p>
</li><li>
<p> Following intervention 86% of high risks were significantly reduced within a 7 month period.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Use of a Risk Register clearly demonstrates effectiveness</p>
</li><li>
<p> Heightened awareness; risk is everyone's business</p>
</li><li>
<p> Audit has shown improvements in identifying risks</p>
</li><li>
<p> Strengthened communication across fundraising and clinical services.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Recommendations</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Understanding of Risk Register to be part of induction training</p>
</li><li>
<p> Use of Register needs to be an ongoing process and should be regularly monitored and updated.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haywood, C., Coackley, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.205</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.205</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk register: an integrated governance approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>272</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/272-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Those who can, do. Those who can do more, volunteer.]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/272-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Motivations, Challenges and Rewards</p>
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Hospice volunteers have been credited with bringing a unique human dimension to an otherwise clinical setting and are considered to be core members of interdisciplinary palliative care teams.</p>
<p>This study looks at volunteers who have a mainly patient contact role within the Hospice.</p>
<p>Over 100 000 volunteers are currently within the hospice movement &ndash; contributing more than 18 million hours of work to their services each year yet they remain a largely under-researched group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> This study hopes to give this under researched group the opportunity to share their experiences with the Hospice and prospective volunteers</p>
</li><li>
<p> To understand the motivating factors for patient contact volunteers</p>
</li><li>
<p> To explore the experiences of those volunteers</p>
</li><li>
<p> To understand the profile of the volunteers, to aid future recruitment of new volunteers and target training and support.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Qualitative study of the experiences of patient contact volunteers using semi structured interviews</p>
</li><li>
<p> Ethics approval granted from Edge Hill University Ethics committee and the Integrated Hospice Governance Group</p>
</li><li>
<p> Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was used.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> 8 semi structured interviews conducted</p>
</li><li>
<p> Volunteers are drawn to hospice work to make a difference</p>
</li><li>
<p> Primary motivation is to discover more about themselves and others</p>
</li><li>
<p> Relatively few negative challenges encountered</p>
</li><li>
<p> Any negatives are cancelled out by the positive benefits gained</p>
</li><li>
<p> Capacity for personal growth is strengthened</p>
</li><li>
<p> Generic knowledge of symptoms would benefit the support they give.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Volunteering is a two way process</p>
</li><li>
<p> The &lsquo;Psychological Contract&rsquo; between the Hospice and its volunteers is very healthy</p>
</li><li>
<p> The organisation has good role deployment, shared values and good level's of communication.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Further developments</st>
<p><l type="unord"><li><p> Volunteer inductions adapted to meet the training needs of individuals (eg, boundaries of care, consideration of first aid training for drivers)</p>
</li><li>
<p> Development of individual &lsquo;Psychological Contracts&rsquo; between the hospice and volunteers.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Turnbull, I., Doran, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.206</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.206</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Research and publication ethics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Those who can, do. Those who can do more, volunteer.]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>272</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>272</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/272-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Souls and shadows live]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/272-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Souls and Shadows is a charitable foundation inspired and founded by Caspar Olsen through his songwriting work with Bob Heath, a music therapist based at Sir Michael Sobell House Hospice in Oxford.</p>
<p>Caspar died in 2006 and the Foundation began work shortly afterwards. Since its inception the foundation has supported many music therapists who work in palliative care by funding training in creative songwriting, the acquisition of recording equipment and in some cases the direct funding to hospices to pay for therapists services. As a result it has had an extremely positive impact on the creative output of many patients at the end of their lives.</p>
<p>It is now proposed that some of this work created by patients is to be presented as a live musical work entitled Souls and Shadows Live. The first concert will be held at The North Wall Theatre in Oxford on April 19th 2011. All of the proceeds will be donated to the Sobell House Hospice Charity.</p>
<p>The production programme takes each writer's work and express its unique emotional message using both live and pre recorded audio-visual musical performance. Simple choreographed scenes from each song are staged to re-enforce the emotion and narrative of each piece with a recurring musical theme linking the song cycle to each individual patients journey and story.</p>
<p>It is hoped that Souls and Shadows Live will not only promote the use of creative music interventions in palliative and bereavement care but will also create opportunities for networking and skills development in the wider musical arena.</p>
<p>This will be an oral presentation which will include pre-recorded and live music from the planned programme.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heath, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.207</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.207</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Souls and shadows live]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>272</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>273</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/273?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Demonstrating quality through advanced care planning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/273?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The National End of Life Strategy set out a particular focus on the care planning of patients at the end of life and with one of the key 10 objectives that individual needs will be documented, reviewed and acted upon in relation to advanced care plans. Specific quality markers and measures for end of life care were published by the department of health in 2009. In relation to advanced care planning these identified a requirement that people approaching the end of life are offered a care plan and that individuals' preferences and choices, when they wish to express them, are documented and communicated to the appropriate professionals.</p>
<p>Significant work has gone on over the past 18 months by the community specialist palliative care team at St John's Hospice to develop policy and guidance, patient documentation and information, and a dedicated database to record whether discussions around patient plans and preference have taken place. This has enabled the team to be in a position to report this as one of three key commissioning for quality and innovation (CQUINS) targets, set jointly with commissioners, which enables quality to be recognised and linked to additional funding. Results for the first full year have been very positive in demonstrating over 85% of patients have had opportunities to discuss and document their advance care plans.</p>
<p>This presentation will explore the challenges in seeking to implement advanced care planning for patients. The need to quantify advanced care planning with patients for commissioners is a particular challenge to be meaningful, informative and transparent. The work by the community specialist team in recording a number of items related to patient preferences may be seen as a precursor to end of life registers that the team are currently involved in as part of both a local and national pilot.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gallini, A., Reddish, M., Martin, T., Barnes, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.210</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000105.210</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Demonstrating quality through advanced care planning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Poster presentations</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>273</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>273</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/275?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author index]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/2/275?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare.2011.authorindex</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare.2011.authorindex</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author index]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract index</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>275</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>276</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A new journal]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><I>BMJ Supportive &amp; Palliative Care</I> is a journal for clinicians, researchers and other healthcare workers in all clinical services where supportive and palliative care is practised. The journal aims to link many disciplines and specialties throughout the world; promoting an exchange of research evidence and innovative practice by presenting high quality scientific reports, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noble, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000033</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000033</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Editor's choice, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A new journal]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>2</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Should a hip fracture in a frail older person be a trigger for assessment of palliative care needs?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murray, I. R., Biant, L. C., Clement, N. C., Murray, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000027</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000027</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health policy, Clinical trials (epidemiology), Epidemiologic studies, Other rehabilitative therapies, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Long term care, Memory disorders (neurology), Pain (neurology), Stroke, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Memory disorders (psychiatry), Physiotherapy, Sports and exercise medicine, General surgery, Surgical oncology, End of life decisions (ethics), Trauma, Health economics, Health service research, Injury]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Should a hip fracture in a frail older person be a trigger for assessment of palliative care needs?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>4</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Benefits and challenges of collaborative research: lessons from supportive and palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To describe the processes of establishing and running the Cancer Experiences Collaborative (CECo), and reflect upon the benefits and challenges of undertaking collaborative research in supportive and palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive analysis of a 5-year research collaborative initiated in 2006.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Research groups at the Universities of Lancaster, Liverpool, Manchester, Nottingham and Southampton, England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>26 UK organisations including the four largest hospices in England, hospital cancer centres, Help the Hospices (a national charity supporting independent hospices) and user representatives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>The aim of CECo was to enhance the value, quality and productivity of scientific research in supportive and palliative care, and to increase research capacity and improve the coordination of collaborative research. Three programmatic themes of research were established: (i) innovative approaches to complex symptoms, (ii) planning for the care of older adults towards the end of life and (iii) research methodology including narrative approaches. Four benefits and challenges are highlighted: strategic leadership and management structures for cross-institutional work, working in multidisciplinary groups and linking research with practice settings, capacity building, and user involvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The activities of CECo have resulted in significant benefits with an increase in good quality research studies that have led to the production of a significant number of peer-reviewed papers, and learning between academics, clinicians and users, which has contributed to raising the standards of supportive and palliative care research. However, the future of such research initiatives is fragile, with concerns about the sustainability of collaboration in the face of diminishing resources.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Payne, S., Seymour, J., Molassiotis, A., Froggatt, K., Grande, G., Lloyd-Williams, M., Foster, C., Wilson, R., Rolls, L., Todd, C., Addington-Hall, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000018</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000018</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Benefits and challenges of collaborative research: lessons from supportive and palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Feature</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>11</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/12?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Articles of interest in other scholarly journals]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/12?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boland, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000056</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000056</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neurogastroenterology, Pancreas and biliary tract, Epidemiologic studies, Pain (neurology), Pancreatic cancer, Pain (palliative care), Unwanted effects / adverse reactions, Medicines regulation, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Articles of interest in other scholarly journals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short cuts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/13?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What challenges good palliative care provision out-of-hours? A qualitative interview study of out-of-hours general practitioners]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/13?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Not much is known about how general practitioners (GPs) who work regular out-of-hours shifts in the community feel about prescribing medication for symptom control in end-of-life care patients, how they gain palliative care experience and what they perceive as benefits and hindrances within service delivery to this vulnerable patient and carer group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine, by interviewing GPs who provide out-of-hours care, aspects of care provision that augmented or challenged palliative care delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Semistructured interviews were conducted with GPs who worked out-of-hours shifts regularly. All interviews were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out-of-hours doctors were not confident about their palliative care knowledge and expressed a wish for more education. Lack of familiarity with patients requiring acute palliative care, compared with the closer bonds formed within the in-hours general practice setting, was perceived as troublesome and problematic, and lack of follow-up was felt to be a major factor. There was a clearly expressed fear of killing or harming patients with the strong drugs used in palliative care. Opiophobia, especially when faced with patients who were seen only once, affected prescribing decisions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study provides further evidence of the needs of a specific subgroup of GPs. In-depth interview analysis of their experiences with palliative care provides a framework for which aspects are perceived as a hindrance in providing good palliative care, and can inform out-of-hours policy and teaching.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taubert, M., Noble, S. I. R., Nelson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000015</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000015</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What challenges good palliative care provision out-of-hours? A qualitative interview study of out-of-hours general practitioners]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What questionnaires exist to measure the perceived competence of generalists in palliative care provision? A critical literature review]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The increase in the numbers of patients requiring palliative care input prior to death, and a global economic situation where few countries are able to invest further in specialist palliative care services, has meant an increased focus upon &lsquo;generalist palliative care provision&rsquo;. The goal of the present review is to ascertain what questionnaire tools exist to measure the perceived competence of generalists in palliative care provision.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A systematic review of both qualitative and quantitative literature was undertaken. Medline, Medline in Progress, PubMed and CINAHL databases as well as hand searches of <I>Palliative Medicine</I>, <I>International Journal of Palliative Nursing</I> and the <I>Journal of Palliative Care</I> were conducted for the period 1990&ndash;2010. A checklist adapted from Hawker <I>et al</I> (Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically. <I>Qual Health Res</I> 2002;<b>12</b>:1284&ndash;99) was used to select and assess data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>19 of the 1361 articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, a lack of validation and a focus upon the physical aspects of symptom management was apparent. No single validated questionnaire to measure perceived competence in palliative care management among health professionals involved in generalist palliative care management could be identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The rising prominence paid to generalist care provision points to an urgent need for further development of comprehensive and validated perceived competence measurement tools.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frey, R., Gott, M., Banfield, R., Campbell, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000028</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000028</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Internet]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What questionnaires exist to measure the perceived competence of generalists in palliative care provision? A critical literature review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>32</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding provision of chemotherapy to patients with end stage cancer: qualitative interview study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/33?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine health professionals' experiences of and attitudes towards the provision of chemotherapy to patients with end stage cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Purposive, qualitative design based on in-depth interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Oncology departments at university hospitals and general hospitals in the Netherlands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>14 physicians and 13 nurses who cared for patients with metastatic cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Physicians and nurses reported trying to inform patients fully about their poor prognosis and treatment options. They would carefully consider the (side) effects of chemotherapy and sometimes doubted whether further treatment would contribute to patients' quality of life. Both groups considered the patients' wellbeing to be important, and physicians seemed inclined to try to preserve this by offering further chemotherapy, often followed by the patient. Nurses were more often inclined to express their doubts about further treatment, preferring to allow patients to make the best use of the time that is left. When confronted with a treatment dilemma and a patient's wish for treatment, physicians preferred to make compromises, such as by "trying out one dose." Discussing death or dying with patients while at the same time administering chemotherapy was considered contradictory as this could diminish the patients' hope.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The trend to greater use of chemotherapy at the end of life could be explained by patients' and physicians' mutually reinforcing attitudes of "not giving up" and by physicians' broad interpretation of patients' quality of life, in which taking away patients' hope by withholding treatment is considered harmful. To rebalance the ratio of quantity of life to quality of life, input from other health professionals, notably nurses, may be necessary.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buiting, H. M., Rurup, M. L., Wijsbek, H., van Zuylen, L., den Hartogh, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmj.d1933</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmj.d1933</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Stroke, End of life decisions (palliative care), Assisted dying, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding provision of chemotherapy to patients with end stage cancer: qualitative interview study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>From the BMJ</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>41</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/42?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals in England: qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/42?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore how transitions to a palliative care approach are perceived to be managed in acute hospital settings in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary or primary care settings in two contrasting areas of England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>58 health professionals involved in the provision of palliative care in secondary or primary care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants identified that a structured transition to a palliative care approach of the type advocated in UK policy guidance is seldom evident in acute hospital settings. In particular they reported that prognosis is not routinely discussed with inpatients. Achieving consensus among the clinical team about transition to palliative care was seen as fundamental to the transition being effected; however, this was thought to be insufficiently achieved in practice. Secondary care professionals reported that discussions about adopting a palliative care approach to patient management were not often held with patients; primary care professionals confirmed that patients were often discharged from hospital with "false hope" of cure because this information had not been conveyed. Key barriers to ensuring a smooth transition to palliative care included the difficulty of "standing back" in an acute hospital situation, professional hierarchies that limited the ability of junior medical and nursing staff to input into decisions on care, and poor communication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Significant barriers to implementing a policy of structured transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals were identified by health professionals in both primary and secondary care. These need to be addressed if current UK policy on management of palliative care in acute hospitals is to be established.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gott, M., Ingleton, C., Bennett, M. I., Gardiner, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmj.d1773</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmj.d1773</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals in England: qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>From the BMJ</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>48</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/49?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Strangury: the case of a symptom with ancient origins]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/49?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wright, B., Husbands, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000030</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000030</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Urology, Clinical trials (epidemiology), Drugs: cardiovascular system, Pain (neurology), Urological cancer, Ischaemic heart disease, Hospice, Pain (palliative care), Biological agents, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Urological surgery, Internet]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Strangury: the case of a symptom with ancient origins]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>49</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>50</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/51?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Cochrane systematic review of acupuncture for cancer pain in adults]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/51?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Cancer-related pain is a significant and debilitating problem. Non-pharmacological treatments such as acupuncture may have an adjunctive role in controlling pain without the undesirable side effects of drug regimens and yet the evidence base remains limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The main objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of cancer-related pain in adults. Subgroup analyses were planned for acupuncture dose and for the outcome of studies investigating acupuncture for cancer-induced bone pain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Six electronic databases were searched, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED and SPORTDiscus. Studies included in the review were randomised controlled trials investigating the use of acupuncture for cancer pain using pain as a primary outcome measure. In total, 253 published references were identified but only three studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the three included studies, only one was judged to be of high methodological quality and showed auricular acupuncture to be superior to placebo acupuncture and ear seeds at placebo points. However, the study was relatively small and blinding was compromised. The two low-quality studies gave positive results in favour of acupuncture for cancer pain, but these results should be viewed with caution due to methodological limitations, small sample sizes, poor reporting and inadequate analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>There is insufficient evidence to judge whether acupuncture is effective in treating cancer pain in adults.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paley, C. A., Tashani, O. A., Bagnall, A.-M., Johnson, M. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000022</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000022</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Pain (neurology), Complementary medicine, Internet]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Cochrane systematic review of acupuncture for cancer pain in adults]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>55</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/56?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the transition from curative care to palliative care: a systematic review of the literature]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/56?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>UK policy guidance on treatment and care towards the end of life identifies a need to better recognise patients who are likely to be in the last 12 months of life. Health and social care professionals have a key role in initiating and managing a patient's transition from &lsquo;curative care&rsquo; to palliative care. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of evidence relating to the transition from curative care to palliative care within UK settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Four electronic databases were searched for studies published between 1975 and March 2010. Inclusion criteria were all UK studies relating to the transition from curative care to palliative care in adults over the age of 18. Selected studies were independently reviewed, data were extracted, quality was assessed and data were synthesised using a descriptive thematic approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 1464 articles initially identified, 12 papers met the criteria for inclusion. Four themes emerged from the literature: (1) patient and carer experiences of transitions; (2) recognition and identification of the transition phase; (3) optimising and improving transitions; and (4) defining and conceptualising transitions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The literature suggests that little is known about the potentially complex transition to palliative care. Evidence suggests that continuity of care and multidisciplinary collaboration are crucial in order to improve the experience of patients making the transition. An important role is outlined for generalist providers of palliative care. Incorporating palliative care earlier in the disease trajectory and implementing a phased transition appear key components of optimum care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gardiner, C., Ingleton, C., Gott, M., Ryan, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2010-000001</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2010-000001</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the transition from curative care to palliative care: a systematic review of the literature]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>56</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>63</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/65?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[International Society of Advance Care Planning and End of Life Care, London, UK 22-24 June 2011: Welcome message for the conference]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/65?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Memory disorders (psychiatry), End of life decisions (ethics), Quality improvement]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[International Society of Advance Care Planning and End of Life Care, London, UK 22-24 June 2011: Welcome message for the conference]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstracts from the International Society of Advance Care Planning and End of Life Care, London, UK 22-24 June 2011</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>65</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>65</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/66-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Honouring the informed choices of persons coming to the end of life]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/66-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This presentation gives participants the opportunity to review major conceptual insights into planning care for serious illness, starting from the demand for honesty about the options, working through the challenges of having so few cultural landmarks for long-term illness with ambiguous timelines, and addressing the changing challenges of caregiving. Categorizing trajectories of illness allows mass customization of service arrays and appears to be especially useful in making appropriate services readily available. But still, patient and family preferences must determine the actual course, so some practical pointers on how to frame and elicit those conversations will be in order. I close with some very challenging issues: assuring quality in the timeliness of death; defining quality of care plans across settings; and conceptualizing quality in unique situations. These issues are still unsettled, but the requirement to plan ahead in order to honour the informed choices of persons living with fatal illness is a settled mandate of good care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colorado, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Honouring the informed choices of persons coming to the end of life]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Plenary Session 1</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>66</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>66</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/66-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ensuring Quality and Choice in End of Life Care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/66-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The presentation will provide a brief background to CQC, its role, the legislation that governs how it operates, its strategic priorities and its principal methodologies. It will identify how CQC will assess whether provider organisations are complying with regulatory requirements and the action that CQC might take if it found that organisations were not compliant.</p>
<p>In particular, it will focus on outcomes from CQC's Essential Standards of Quality and Safety which are key to the delivery of end of life care that meets these requirements, which will include (among other issues):</p>
<p>Outcome 1 - Respecting and Involving People who use services: ensuring people are involved in planning their care, that decisions and rights are respected and that people and their representatives are supported in making informed choices etc.</p>
<p>Outcome 4 - Care and welfare: ensuring that people have the care, treatment and support they need at the end of their life, including access to special palliative care services and pain control; that they are involved in decision making; that they have appropriate information; their families' (or those close to them with them/supporting them) wishes are respected; and that they have a dignified death with appropriate respect, privacy, dignity and comfort needs met.</p>
<p>Outcome 6 - Co operating with other providers: that all providers involved in end of life care work in partnership to ensure appropriate access to services, for example district nurses, palliative care services, appropriate transfers between care providers.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pain (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ensuring Quality and Choice in End of Life Care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Plenary Session 1</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>66</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>66</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/66-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evolution of advance care planning in Australia - launching the new international advance care planning and end of life care society]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/66-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Although there were small areas of interest in advance care planning (ACP) and the ability to refuse treatment in Australia as early as 1987, the implementation of and research in, ACP began in 2002 with Australian Federal government and Victorian State government funding of the Respecting Patient Choices Program. This program has been established in many hospitals, health services and aged care homes throughout Australia and has been adapted successfully to local conditions and legislation. There is an increasing body of research to support ACP, including a randomised controlled trial published in the BMJ (<I>BMJ</I> 2010;340:c1345).</p>
<p>With the growing public and political interest in ACP a number of new initiatives have been undertaken including:<l type="tab"><li><p> new supportive legislation in several states and territories</p>
</li><li>
<p> a National government sponsored review of existing legislation with recommendations for achieving national uniformity</p>
</li><li>
<p> recommendations in the Australian National Health &amp; Hospitals Reform Commission Report that ACP should be available in all aged care homes.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The holding of the Inaugural International ACP conference in Melbourne in April 2010 galvanised interest and support for ACP in Australia and raised awareness internationally, leading to the establishment of International Society of Advance Care Planning and End of Life Care -ACPEL Society with hundreds of members joining from around the world. The Society will be officially launched at a London conference.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silvester, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evolution of advance care planning in Australia - launching the new international advance care planning and end of life care society]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Plenary Session 1</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>66</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>66</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/66-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gold standards framework annual meeting. Improving end of life care using gold standards framework]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/66-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Over the last century the way we die has changed and there has been a growing awareness and consideration of end-of-life care as a society. Now, we have the chance to live longer with serious illnesses, to live in the context of our dying, to plan our end-of-life care, to consider the kind of life and death we wish to have through advance care planning discussions &ndash; highlighting and improving this further is the purpose of this ACPEL conference.</p>
<p>In England, the challenge of improving end-of-life care for all was moved a step-change further by the comprehensive NHS End of Life Care Strategy (2008), helping to mainstream end-of-life care within health and social care. The Strategy supported introducing advance care planning discussions early, and recommended that &lsquo;every organisation involved in providing end of life care will be expected to adopt a coordination process such as the Gold Standards Framework (GSF)&rsquo;.</p>
<p>GSF is an evidence based whole system approach, that aims to improve the quality, coordination and organisation of care leading to better patient outcomes in line with their wishes. It incorporates advance care planning as a key step in the process of integrated delivery. The wide range of training programmes run from the National GSF Centre, enable generalist frontline staff to provide quality care for people nearing the end of life, providing teaching, tools, evaluations, resources and guidance. An update will be provided during the session.</p>
<p>The GSF Training Programmes includes those in Primary Care (basic GSF established 2000 and widely used by most GP Practices), care homes/long term facilities, Acute Hospitals, Domiciliary Care, Community Hospitals, spiritual care etc. The new practice-based distance-learning Next Stage GSF programme &lsquo;Going for Gold&rsquo; was launched to improve primary care further. Over 2000 care homes have undertaken the 9&ndash;12 month practical GSFCH Training and up to 200 homes/year are accredited. The Acute Hospital programme is in its second phase, with benefits demonstrated, but many challenges.</p>
<p>One of the key ways forward in future will be the integration of such coordinating frameworks involving frontline generalist providers across boundaries of care, to provide seamless integrated consistent support using a common language. Some examples of best practice using GSF will be described and some planned developments described.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas, K., Stobbart-Rowlands, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gold standards framework annual meeting. Improving end of life care using gold standards framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 1</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>66</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>67</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/67-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[International perspectives on advance care planning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/67-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Fraser Health Authority in British Columbia, Canada serves 1.5 million people, spanning over 12 communities with 26 000 employees and has been a provincial and national leader in advance care planning (ACP) for the past 7 years. Our goal is to continue to promote and enhance ACP across our health system by promoting conversations with patients and families and improving communication and documentation of decision making in all programs of Fraser Health.</p>
<p>In June 2010, we embarked on the Talking it Thru: Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment initiative to further embed ACP practices into all programs with key clinicians and populations clearly identified. This presentation will assist learners to gain further understanding of the importance of systematic engagement in order to embed and sustain ACP in large healthcare organizations and to enhance standardized practices for quality patient-centred care at end of life. The End of Life program provides project leadership and supports programs as they assess current practices, identify gaps and opportunities and plan for implementation.</p>
<p>Phase One of this 3 year project included engaging programs by identifying leadership, facilitating Focus Groups and helping program leadership plan for implementation. 16 Focus Groups were held with over 200 clinicians. Input from program areas such Aboriginal Health, Home Health, Primary Care and Medicine as well as discipline areas such as respiratory therapists, social workers and hospitalists have proven invaluable to help shape policy, develop tools and resources and to address educational needs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barwich, D., Hoffmann, C., Tayler, C., Roberts, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[International perspectives on advance care planning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 1</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>67</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/67-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Who makes use of the enduring guardianship provisions in Tasmania (Australia) and what do they write on the forms?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/67-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Under the provisions of the Guardianship and Administration Act 1995 in the state of Tasmania (Australia), the document of appointment has to be registered with the Guardianship and Administration Board. This study therefore provides an unusual opportunity to learn what people write in their Enduring Guardianship (EG) forms, who they appoint as enduring guardians, and also gives other valuable demographic information about the appointment of substitute decision-makers, the making of advance care directives in Tasmania. It also gives a rare opportunity to obtain &lsquo;denominator&rsquo; data about the uptake of these provisions in a defined jurisdiction.</p>
<p>A total of 502 EG forms were analysed, out of a total of 10 040 forms lodged at the time of the study, since 1995. This represents a 2% uptake by a population of approximately 500 000 over a 15-year period. In total there were 298 females and 176 males, with 28 forms where gender was not recorded.</p>
<p>The majority of the sample consisted of forms completed by retired persons aged over 60. Despite the fact that legal assistance is not necessary to complete an EG form, 197/502 (39%) showed evidence of some qualified legal input.</p>
<p>238/502 (47%) of the forms contained some kind of statement about care at the end of life, and indicated a preference for the deployment of timely and appropriate palliative care.</p>
<p>Persons who appoint enduring guardians in Tasmania are predominantly older retired citizens, whose single most frequently expressed concern is for palliative care at the end of life.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas, R., Ashby, M., Thornton, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Who makes use of the enduring guardianship provisions in Tasmania (Australia) and what do they write on the forms?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 1</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>67</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/67-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Combining top-down and bottom-up change management strategies in implementation of ACP: the My Wishes program in South West Sydney, Australia]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/67-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Attempts to introduce advance care planning (ACP) and make it a part of normal clinical practice present significant challenges and one way of approaching these is to utilise the change management literature. One aspect of this literature is the relative importance of top-down and bottom-up strategies to promote and support organisational change.</p>
<p>The Sydney South West Area Health Service (SSWAHS) launched the My Wishes Advance Care Planning program in early 2010 and the implementation plan employed both top-down and bottom-up strategies.</p>
<p>Key strategies of a top-down nature included: a comprehensive, organisational-wide policy; several new forms as part of the medical records of all hospitals; incorporation of these into the developing electronic medical records system; hospital General Managers having to report on local implementation of the program; involvement of local General Practice Divisions as program partners; and launch of a comprehensive website (<A HREF="http://www.mywishes.org.au">http://www.mywishes.org.au</A>).</p>
<p>Bottom-up strategies included: community information forums; workshops for health service and residential care staff; liaising with hospital departments and other services to include ACP information on their normal education agenda; putting ACP on the agendas of other initiatives in the health service such as chronic care and end-of life care; and supporting staff who would be advocates for the program.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shanley, C., Johnston, L., Walker, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Information management]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Combining top-down and bottom-up change management strategies in implementation of ACP: the My Wishes program in South West Sydney, Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 1</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>68</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/68-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Gift to Your Family]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/68-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This workshop will describe an initiative within a Canadian health authority (Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH)), in which the Community Engagement Team and the Advance Care Planning (ACP) project leadership partnered to seek this public engagement. To better understand the public's perspectives, and to facilitate greater public acceptance of ACP in our health region, a public forum was held in March 2010. The workshop will outline the forum participants, the program including discussion topics and the outcomes. Themes discussed at the forum included key aspects of public messaging, countering public fear by &lsquo;normalising&rsquo; ACP conversations and supporting patients and families to have these conversations. It was acknowledged that some members of the public might be mistrustful or worried about the intent and outcomes of ACP and thus the need to emphasize the benefits of ACP, &lsquo;a gift to your family&rsquo;. The forum influenced the emphasis of the ACP project on the importance of communication, the language used for public information and the ways in which the public are involved in education. At the forum, a number of public participants expressed interest in assisting with public education; subsequently, a group of volunteers has been trained and will present ACP workshops to public groups in our region. The experience of these volunteers will continue to inform our VCH approach to ACP.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGregor, D., Porterfield, P., Tolson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Gift to Your Family]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 1</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>68</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/68-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ACP in the New Zealand medicolegal context]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/68-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Advance Care Planning (ACP) in New Zealand (NZ) is being implemented into a unique medicolegal environment. This has practical implications as well as providing an opportunity for critical analysis of the place of legally recognised advance decisions within the overall process and philosophy of ACP.</p>
<p>NZ has no specific statute in relation to ACP or the use Advance Directives (AD) although it is acknowledged in the Code of Rights that ADs may be used in accordance with the common law. In addition legally authorised proxy and or substitute decision makers are uncommon and have limited powers. In the overwhelming majority of cases authority to make decisions on behalf of incompetent patients resides with clinicians. Implementation of ACP in this context provides a valuable opportunity to carefully consider the advantages and disadvantages of the NZ medicolegal framework compared with that in other countries and to share insights gained.</p>
<p>ACP is intended to give greater &lsquo;voice&rsquo; to individuals (patients). There are however risks to over-emphasising ACP as a mechanism primarily intended to give patients' &lsquo;voice&rsquo; through legal mechanisms for advance decisions which come in to effect once the individual is incompetent The greater benefit from ACP comes from hearing patients while they are still able to speak to us and including them in shared-planning within clinician-patient relationships based in mutual respect and trust. Effective ACP reduces occasions on which clinicians are required to make decisions on behalf of incompetent patients, but where they still are, should also result in better decision-making.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moore, M., Grundy, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Legal and forensic medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ACP in the New Zealand medicolegal context]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 1</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>68</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/68-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance care planning in life limiting illness]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/68-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In the Spanish advance care planning (ACP) Program &lsquo;KAYR&Oacute;S- Helping Conversations&rsquo;, inspired in Respecting Choices philosophy, we developed an innovative cluster research, NEURO-KAYR&Oacute;S, applied to two neurodegenerative diseases with contrasting trajectories: early Alzheimer's Disease (AD)-grant research project for clinical research ACP implementation in dyads (patient-surrogate)- and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)- stem cell non-commercial research grant clinical trial with clinical psychology follow-up. We monitor the ACP dyadic (patient-surrogate) interview with tools, combining quantitative with qualitative approaches, that allow us to gain insight in the process of living (and planning) with a threatening neurodegenerative illness/hoping for the best/preparing for the worst. Quantitative tools for: ACP knowledge; trends of preferences for goals of treatment in different potential (or experienced) losses during illness trajectory; congruence with surrogate; critical milestones marking transitions. Qualitative tools: discussion groups and in-depth interview.</p>
<p>AD and ALS although share some common features, leaning towards dependency, vary significantly in some key notes regarding both with the perception of the illness trajectory (related to patient's own biography) and, along it, with the potential support received from the ACP process.</p>
<p>Initial lessons from the first 6 months of the ongoing 2 year project.</p>
<p>Illness trajectory (perception AD vs ALS): (slow) cognitive versus (fast) physical decline; advanced versus middle-age; slow versus fast adaptation (subject, carers &amp; environment); role of substituted decision.</p>
<p>ACP Process: in clinical versus research (clinical trial) setting; from ignorance to gratitude if initial anxiety and/or threat are overcome by a system that shows that cares and stands, come what may.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judez, J., Vivancos, L., Antunez, C., Quesada, M., Novoa, A., Feito, L., Ogando, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Psychogeriatrics, Memory disorders (neurology), Drugs: CNS (not psychiatric), Motor neurone disease, Neuromuscular disease, Spinal cord, Memory disorders (psychiatry), Psychiatry of old age]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance care planning in life limiting illness]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>NEURO-KAYR[Oacute]S: two ACP contrasting experiences with neurodegenerative diseases, AD and ALS, common trades and differences in illness trajectories</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>68</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/68-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hoping for a cure and planning for end-of-life]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/68-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Advance care planning (ACP) aims to enhance end-of-life care yet often fails to live up to that potential. This interpretive study was designed to explore the process and outcomes of ACP using the Patient-centered ACP interview (PC-ACP) developed by Respecting Choices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Patients diagnosed with advanced lung cancer and family members were recruited. Nine family dyads participated in the PC-ACP interview. Follow-up interviews took place 3 and 6 months after the PC-ACP interview. Thematic analysis was conducted on transcribed interviews using constant comparison.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Hope was a significant theme in the ACP process and this paper reports on that theme. Hope for a cure was one of many hopes that supported quality of life. Three themes were identified: hope is multi-faceted, hope for a cure is well considered and hope is resilient and persistent. The seeming paradox of hoping for a cure of an incurable cancer did not interfere with the process of ACP. The dyads engaged in explicit discussions of end-of-life scenarios and preferences for care. ACP did not interfere with hope and hope for a cure did not interfere with ACP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Significance</st>
<p>Concerns about false hope are called into question. The principle of honouring hope is not necessarily in conflict with the principle of truthful communication. This is clinically significant as the findings suggest we need not disrupt hope we think of as &lsquo;unrealistic&rsquo; as long as it supports living well. Further, ACP can be successful even in the context of hoping for a cure.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robinson, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Stroke, Lung cancer (oncology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Lung cancer (respiratory medicine), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hoping for a cure and planning for end-of-life]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>NEURO-KAYR[oacute]S: two ACP contrasting experiences with neurodegenerative diseases, AD and ALS, common trades and differences in illness trajectories</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>69</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/69-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The impact on the place of death through advance care planning documentation in heart failure and end stage respiratory disease patients]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/69-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A retrospective review was performed of 23 respiratory (n=21) and heart failure (n=2) hospice patient notes, who died between 1 January 2009 and 31 June 2010, (12 women, 11 men: 54&ndash;92 years). All the notes included letters documenting advance care planning (ACP) preferences and decisions (eg, preferred place of care (PPC) and/or death (PPD), treatment preferences, resuscitation status etc).</p>
<p>78% (18/23) of deaths were achieved in the preferred place of death or care as documented in ACP letters or the ongoing ACP process<l type="tab"><li><p> 13/23 (57%) patients achieved their documented PPD (9/23 Home, 4/23 Hospice).</p>
</li><li>
<p> 4/23 (17%) patients did not achieve their initial documented PPD but died in the Hospice.</p>
</li><li>
<p> 1/23 (4%) patients died in their PPC (hospital) as they had requested admission for treatment of potentially reversible causes including ITU.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>2/23 (9%) were sudden deaths at home for patients who had otherwise requested admission for treatment of potentially reversible causes.</p>
<p>2/23 (9%) were deaths in hospital for patients admitted for treatment who died while inpatients (one for blood transfusion; one reason unknown).</p>
<p>1/23 (4%) place of death was unknown.</p>
<p>16/18 (89%) patients did not die in hospital as requested.</p>
<p>This review provides evidence that ACP conversations and documentation influence patient's attainment of their preferred place of death, including not dying where they don't want to. When implementing ACP, consideration should be given to where people want to die, where they do not and their preferred places of care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chadwick, S., Miller, B., Russell, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Haematology (incl blood transfusion), Drugs: cardiovascular system, Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The impact on the place of death through advance care planning documentation in heart failure and end stage respiratory disease patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>NEURO-KAYR[oacute]S: two ACP contrasting experiences with neurodegenerative diseases, AD and ALS, common trades and differences in illness trajectories</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>69</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/69-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introducing advance care planning in community palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/69-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To design and introduce for all patients referred to a hospice community team an intervention that facilitates advance care planning (ACP), and to evaluate the feasibility and utility of this innovation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Piloting of the implementation of structured ACP, followed by a longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation. We introduced into routine practice a structured aide memoire (to facilitate ACP) and recording sheet.</p>
<p>We evaluated this intervention prospectively collecting detailed process and outcomes data and conducted serial interviews with patients, their case linked carers and CNS. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>We routinely attempted ACP from initial contact. In only 18% of patients could this be initiated at 1st visit due to various barriers The documentation of PPC increased compared with before (58% vs 30%) but the ACP prompt was only used in 8%.</p>
<p>The serial interviews identified barriers to ACP for patients, carers and the CNS. A fear of dying and the patient perception of who should undertake ACP emerged as important patient barriers while there are specific challenges to care planning in patients with organ failure and the frail elderly with cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Facilitated ACP with prompts proved less useful for initiating conversation for CNS in palliative care. However the introduction of structured documentation improved the recording and communication of care preferences. Significant barriers to ACP exist which may persist despite skilled facilitation. More research and education is necessary before ACP can become routine for all who desire it.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sives, D., Cornbleet, M. A., Murray, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introducing advance care planning in community palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>NEURO-KAYR[oacute]S: two ACP contrasting experiences with neurodegenerative diseases, AD and ALS, common trades and differences in illness trajectories</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>69</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/69-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On Your Marks, Get Set, Go! Piloting Advance Care Planning Education]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/69-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In 2009, Mount Vernon Cancer Network piloted four 1 day experiential advance care planning (ACP) workshops in four locations facilitated by two educators. The training the trainer model was considered early in order to increase the availability of ACP facilitators across MVCN. Participants to the 1 day workshops were invited to attend a 1/2 day &lsquo;Teaching Advance Care Planning&rsquo;.</p>
<p>51 participants attended the workshops:<l type="tab"><li><p> 45% Community Matrons, District, Respiratory Specialist Nurses, Care Home Staff</p>
</li><li>
<p> 18% palliative care education roles</p>
</li><li>
<p> 15% hospice care</p>
</li><li>
<p> 12% Clinical Nurse Specialists in Palliative Care</p>
</li><li>
<p> 6% hospice social workers</p>
</li><li>
<p> 4% associate specialist/GP assistant roles.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The participants confidence increased significantly following attendance at the workshops: Pre Post</p>
<p>Confidence in explaining ACP 54% 100%.</p>
<p>What a statement of wishes and preferences is 33% 93%.</p>
<p>What an advance decision to refuse treatment is 24% 91%.</p>
<p>When lasting power of attorney (welfare) is used 15% 87%.</p>
<p>A &lsquo;Teaching Advance Care Planning&rsquo; 1/2 day interactive workshop discussed the rationale for the 1 day course, signposting to relevant resources and information about the wider evidence base for advance care planning. Participants brought to the sessions the type of sessions, target audience and timings that they planned to deliver training to. Draft lesson plans and resources were produced during the workshop for them to take away to practice. Delivery methods and interactive exercises were also discussed and offered. The education model was further developed and delivered in 2010.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell, S., Fowler, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On Your Marks, Get Set, Go! Piloting Advance Care Planning Education]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>NEURO-KAYR[Oacute]S: two ACP contrasting experiences with neurodegenerative diseases, AD and ALS, common trades and differences in illness trajectories</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>70</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/70-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Facilitating the public discussions of advance care planning with audio-visual media in taiwan - a action research]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/70-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>With the action research method, the senior physicians and nurses became involved with the community: they interviewed 32 seniors, ages 50 to 80, through a focus group to understand their needs and suggestions regarding issues related to terminal medical decisions. The following five points regarding the presentation are summarized: (1) be easy to understand, not boring; (2) be realistic and accurate; (3) clearly guide the thinking of the important issues; (4) narrative; (5) present with actual images. The physicians and nurses further worked with the IT professionals. After five panel meetings and three times modified according to the experts and audiences' suggestions, a 10-min video that combines flash design and real images was created. Total 291 valid questionnaires were collected in a university, a church and a nursing home; the participants included elementary school students as well as 80+ years old seniors. A discussion about the terminal medical decision was guided after each play of the video. 97.6% expressed interest in the issue related to terminal medical decision and the willingness of sharing and discussing it with their families. 98.3% indicated that when they or their illness reached the final stage, they wanted no more CPR and wished to receive hospice care. The results show the effect to use audio-visual media to guide the public to understand what is actually happening in terminal emergency treatment, to think about their own terminal medical decisions and to stand up and defend their own medical autonomies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, W., Chao, C. S., Chiu, G., Lin, P. C., Weng, Y.-C., Kuo, Y. M., Shih, Y. L., Lai, W.-S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Facilitating the public discussions of advance care planning with audio-visual media in taiwan - a action research]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>NEURO-KAYR[Oacute]S: two ACP contrasting experiences with neurodegenerative diseases, AD and ALS, common trades and differences in illness trajectories</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>70</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>70</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/70-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Communication skills for advance care planning at end-of-life]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/70-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A total of 44 one day advance care planning (ACP) communications workshops were developed and delivered across two counties to health and social care practitioners Band 5 and above. This collaborative project between two Hospices and a University aimed to develop knowledge, skills and confidence in ACP discussions underpinned by national and local initiatives and policy and the evidence base.</p>
<p>Satisfaction with the programme was excellent with 98% of participants very satisfied/satisfied that the programme was clinically relevant. There were post programme increases in confidence in exploring patient cues, structuring an ACP discussion and identifying patient &amp; relatives concerns.</p>
<p>The workshops also highlighted areas for further development in more general communication skills including identifying and following through cues and use of questions and silence.</p>
<p>The structure of these workshops has since been used for the development of other local programmes addressing ACP and dementia.</p>
<p>However recommendations from this evaluation would suggest that further communication skills training prior to the application to ACP discussions would facilitate conversations taking place particularly in getting conversations started.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campbell, H., Lillyman, S., Nicholson, P., Fisher, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Memory disorders (psychiatry), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Communication skills for advance care planning at end-of-life]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>NEURO-KAYR[Oacute]S: two ACP contrasting experiences with neurodegenerative diseases, AD and ALS, common trades and differences in illness trajectories</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>70</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>70</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/70-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['We were here - Three persons' journeys of life']]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/70-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Narrative interviewing can be traced in American history as far back as 1920. Its application to Advance Care Planning (ACP) as a research method has yet to be extensively researched but where explored, it is the meaning portrayed and the perspective of the value of the event that assists learning. The methodology being less structured and using conversational interaction provides ACP Facilitators' opportunity to reflect on elements such as culture diversity and aspects of life that have compelling interest.</p>
<p>My curiosity in narrative interviewing began in the 80s when involved in death and dying education and was regenerated when implementing the Respecting Patient Choices Program (RPC) at Ipswich Hospital and the surrounding West Moreton Health Service District in 2009. Through the RPC processes including, training of Facilitators and leading the facilitation of ACP conversations in acute, residential and community settings it contributed to my desire to scribe the experiences and lives of three special people and follow their stories through to death with family members.</p>
<p>Scribing these privileged moments in time has provided me with invaluable lessons in life and living, consolidated my reasons of the importance of sharing their lives and their personal meanings when training and preparing Facilitators. The lives explored in context confront positively the importance of ACP and become the infancy of a library of &lsquo;real experiences' that can be intertwined in models of ACP learning.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laidlaw, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA['We were here - Three persons' journeys of life']]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>NEURO-KAYR[Oacute]S: two ACP contrasting experiences with neurodegenerative diseases, AD and ALS, common trades and differences in illness trajectories</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>70</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>70</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/71-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence Base of Advance Care Planning for Patients with Advanced Disease: research evidence leading to practical implementation]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/71-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The majority of chronically ill individuals do not participate in advance care planning (ACP) and therefore are denied the opportunity to clarify their values, treatment preferences and goals for end-of-life care. Numerous patient, health care provider and health system barriers to routinely facilitating effective ACP have been identified. Unlike other interventions, there are no consistent standards about when to initiate or how to conduct these discussions. In addition, patients' perspectives of the salient elements of ACP and their preferences regarding how ACP should be facilitated may differ from those of their health care professionals. Recently, however, systems and processes have been evolving to integrate ACP into routine clinical care for patients with advanced diseases, involving substantial behavioural change, health information technology, social marketing and legislation/policy changes.</p>
<p>While data from clinical trials of multidimensional ACP interventions remain limited, preliminary evidence strongly supports the value of ACP in allowing patients to prepare for death, strengthen relationships with loved ones, achieve a sense of control, relieve burdens placed on others and through all this positively enhance hope. ACP has also been shown to strengthen patient-physician relationships, achieve higher congruence between surrogates and patients in their understanding of patients' end-of-life preferences, and attain greater satisfaction with and less conflict about these end-of-life decisions. Data specific to end-of-life care practices are more limited but suggest ACP has positive outcomes such as increased hospice length of stay, less time spent in hospital and more deaths occurring at patients' place of choice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davison, S. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Health promotion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence Base of Advance Care Planning for Patients with Advanced Disease: research evidence leading to practical implementation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Plenary Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>71</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>71</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/71-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Improving Advance Care Planning in Care Homes and other settings, as part of the Gold Standards Framework Training Programme]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/71-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a pivotal aspect of the Gold Standards Framework Care Homes Training Programme used by over 2000 care homes (aged care/long term facilities) in England. The key ACP standard to be attained for accreditation is that &lsquo;An ACP discussion is offered to and recorded for every resident and their families/carers.&rsquo; Despite some initial barriers and difficulties in introducing this within this sector, a recent survey confirms that it is extremely successfully used, with considerable benefit for all.</p>
<p>There will be an overview of GSF Care Homes Training Programme, describing lessons learnt, evidence of improvements in the confidence and effectiveness of staff, interviews with staff from accredited care homes describing their experiences and guidance on ACP with dementia patients.</p>
<p>In the second half of this interactive workshop, we will be led by Prof Joanne Lynn to explore a challenging subject in your setting, discuss the difficulties and how some have been overcome. We will be supported to develop key aims, measures and changes to address ACP or another key problem. We will hear the experiences of others in this field and help provide practical suggestions for best practice in your area.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas, K., Stobbart-Rowlands, M., Giles, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Memory disorders (neurology), Memory disorders (psychiatry)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Improving Advance Care Planning in Care Homes and other settings, as part of the Gold Standards Framework Training Programme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>71</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>71</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/71-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance care planning: the impact of law and public policy]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/71-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Advance Care Planning in England has been advanced through a combination of clinical practice, legislation (the Mental Capacity Act 2005) and public policy (The End of Life Care Strategy 2008 and related regional and local strategies), which carry with them compliance, governance and training requirements. Power has been placed in the hands of the people being cared for, as well as the services and professionals who commission and provide care. This presentation will examine the holistic impact on advance care planning of this multi-levered approach to implementation, and identify the impact of the different levers, separately and collectively.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chapman, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance care planning: the impact of law and public policy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>71</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>71</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/71-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dying in acute care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/71-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The demography of dying in Australia, as in other developed countries, has shifted dramatically in a single generation. Cause of death, place of death and mode of dying are all unrecognisable to the generation currently facing death. The fastest growing causes of death in Australia are dementia (now third commonest) and diabetes (sixth), two thirds die in acute care, most from a decision to withhold or withdraw treatment.</p>
<p>Acute care has largely failed to embrace its role as the dominant place of death, and remains committed to a set of defaults that I call the DED (the Do Everything Defaults). Palliative Care has failed, in many cases, to fill the gap.</p>
<p>This paper details a series of projects running in NSW, Australia that attempt to link our advancing knowledge of advance care planning with existing systems of care. Specifically,<l type="tab"><li><p> introducing new admission processes that capture preferences for substitute decision makers</p>
</li><li>
<p> using a risk of death tool administered by nurses to trigger a MOLST process</p>
</li><li>
<p> modifying the existing deteriorating patient systems (including MET)</p>
</li><li>
<p> modifying observation charts for those in the process of dying that parallels existing charts but with altered parameters. These would function as an alternative to existing end of life pathways, which have not been a great success.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The aim is to produce a &lsquo;chain of palliation&rsquo; to parallel the dominant &lsquo;chain of survival&rsquo;.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saul, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.21</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.21</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Memory disorders (psychiatry), Adult intensive care, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dying in acute care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>71</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>72</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/72-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bringing in care planning conversations for patients whose recovery is uncertain: learning from the AMBER care bundle]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/72-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>60 per cent of people in our inner city area die in an acute hospital. The hospital provides good care to patients known to be dying through the Liverpool Care Pathway. Delays in recognising that a patient may be end of life prevents timely patient and family involvement in planning care. Some of these delays relate to hospital staff having difficulties in managing uncertainty, as patients receive full active treatment. This can result in distress and preferences not being met.</p>
<p>The team designed and develop the AMBER care bundle for patients who may be receiving active treatment but whose recovery is uncertain. The care bundle comprises four elements:<l type="tab"><li><p> Clear medical plan</p>
</li><li>
<p> Clear escalation plan</p>
</li><li>
<p> Nurses agree with medical plan</p>
</li><li>
<p> Patient/family meeting.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The care bundle complements, but does not replace existing care pathways. Staff make key decisions around ceilings of treatment and care and treatment preferences involving patients and their families. Patients are identified via ward rounds, nursing handover, multi-disciplinary meetings and by the patient safety team.</p>
<p>To date 122 patients have received the AMBER care bundle. 48% were transferred to the community from hospital. 78% died in their preferred place of care.</p>
<p>Staff often needed initial training or support to hold the family meetings. Expert facilitation helped to overcome barriers. Patients and family feedback has been positive. There have been benefits to team working and within team communication around this important patient group.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morris, M., Briant, L., Chidgey-Clark, J., Shouls, S., Carey, I., Hopper, A., Robinson, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Medical error/ patient safety]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bringing in care planning conversations for patients whose recovery is uncertain: learning from the AMBER care bundle]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>72</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/72-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance care planning influences patient's wishes for future medical treatments, and the nomination of surrogates]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/72-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Advance care planning (ACP) assists patients to document their future medical treatment wishes and to appoint a surrogate. It is assumed that discussion with patients about their medical conditions, treatment and prognosis will influence and potentially change these decisions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To assess the impact of ACP on decision-making regarding: (1) Patient wishes regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and life-prolonging treatment (LPT); (2) Whether they have and correctly report having a surrogate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In our previous study (<I>BMJ</I> 2010) of 154 patients allocated to ACP intervention, 125 completed ACP and108 expressed wishes regarding CPR and LPT. At study enrolment all patients were asked whether they already had any wishes on end-of-life care including CPR and LPT, and whether they already had a surrogate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> LPT, and CPR (%) Decisions
<tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="1"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Yes</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Yes- DOO<cross-ref type="tblfn" refid="T1FN1">*</cross-ref></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">No</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Delegate<cross-ref type="tblfn" refid="T1FN2">#</cross-ref></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Don't know</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="2">CPR</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Pre-ACP</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">19</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">43</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Post-ACP</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">30</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">49</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="2">LPT</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Pre-ACP</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">62</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Post-ACP</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">36</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">36</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">23</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2</c></r></tblbdy><tblfn id="T1FN1"><no>*</no><p>depending on outcome</p>
</tblfn><tblfn id="T1FN2"><no>#</no>
<p>delegating decision-making to surrogate/doctor.</p>
</tblfn></tbl>
</p></li><li>
<p>Nomination of surrogate</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>After ACP 58 patients had a surrogate, 18 of which were pre-existing. At enrolment only 10 of these correctly identified they had a surrogate, 6 said they did not and 2 didn't know.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Following ACP many patients change their wishes regarding CPR, and LPT, often to less aggressive treatments and often choose to delegate decision making to others. ACP also assists patients to nominate and understand the important role of surrogates.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Detering, K., Hancock, A., Reade, M., Silvester, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.23</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.23</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Interventional cardiology, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance care planning influences patient's wishes for future medical treatments, and the nomination of surrogates]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>72</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/72-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Structured advance care planning and its impact on patients at end-of-life: a review]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/72-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Following the trial conducted by Detering et al (2008), Respecting Patient Choices implemented a formal process for advance care planning (ACP) provided by dedicated ACP staff. The intention was to review the impact of ACP on end of life care 12 months after implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>A systematic evaluation of deaths of patients who underwent ACP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We reviewed the end of life care of patients over a 12 month period. The review included ACP documentation, patient acuity, demographics, legal capacity, location at death and medical interventions prior to death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 108 patients 68% had formal ACP while the other 32% were introduced to the concepts of ACP. Median age was 78, 47% Male with both genders comparable in ACP completion; 76% had 2&ndash;4 comorbidities, however less ACPs were completed in those with more comorbidities. 73% lived at home with others and were less likely to complete ACP (67%) than those living alone (83%). 70% had legal capacity on admission. Location of death showed that 40% of patients died in a palliative care unit, 32% died in an acute ward, while of patients who died at home 100% had completed ACP. Only 2/73 patients who completed ACP had ICU admissions versus 6/35 who only received a brief introduction to ACP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>(1) Using dedicated staff is an effective way of delivering ACP to patients. (2) A completed ACP process ensures that end of life wishes are known and respected.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Renton, J., Detering, K., Silvester, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.24</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.24</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Structured advance care planning and its impact on patients at end-of-life: a review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>73</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/73-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How using secondary data sources can enhance our understanding of end-of-life care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/73-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The National End of Life Care Strategy outlined the reforms necessary to improve the quality of life and dying in England. Information is power to those who want to improve care, and a compendium was commissioned to bring together available data sources on end of life, in one unique place.</p>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A systematic review of routine data sources on end of life care. Resources were reviewed for their relevance, coverage, temporality and timeliness, completeness and representativeness. A web-based tool was launched on the NEoLCIN website.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The measure, &lsquo;The percentage of all deaths that occur at home&rsquo;, has been adopted as a national indicator (N129). However, the complexity of death and the broad range of factors influencing decision making, mean this measure should be interpreted using a much wider range of data.</p>
<p>To date 59 unique data sources have been identified held by 15 organisations, covering 14 topics.</p>
<p>Data sources are available on service infrastructure, demography and disease trajectories. Service infrastructure sources include: hospice care (2), palliative care in hospitals (3), primary care (2), residential and nursing homes (8), social care (19), emergency hospital care (1) prison (1) and carers (5). Nine data sources can be used for the assessment of population change in terms of size, composition and health status. Eight data sources provide data on illness and disease progression, to further understand place and quality of death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>For the first time, data sources on end of life care have been assessed and are now available on one site.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bowtell, N., Verne, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.25</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.25</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Prison medicine, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How using secondary data sources can enhance our understanding of end-of-life care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>73</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/73-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Making difficult conversations easier: the cards, the kit and the quill]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/73-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The preferences of patients, families and health professionals for preparations for dying have been identified by Steinhauser (<I>JPSM</I> September 2001;22(3)).</p>
<p>Based on this work, CodaAlliance has developed the &lsquo;GoWish&rsquo; card game to help patients communicate their preferences to families and health professionals.</p>
<p>Palliative Care The &lsquo;Doing it in Style&rsquo; Kit, collated by the author, also builds on Steinhauser's work and others, to develop a framework of 10 steps describing effective strategies for preparing for dying. Advance Care Planning features prominently.</p>
<p>A Statement of Choices, derived from the Respecting Patient Choices program, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia has been modified specifically for palliative care use, to document the wishes of people in regard to future treatments and other end of life issues. During its completion, the new form guides the discussion to allow the values and beliefs of a person to be noted, provides relevant information about life prolonging treatments, confirms ongoing palliative care measures and gives reassurance that the dying phase of the illness will not be prolonged.</p>
<p>The cards, the kit and the quill are combined in a new, innovative way to initiate conversations and then to help people express their desires in written form.</p>
<p>Feedback has been positive.</p>
<p>Patients feel that they remain involved in their own care, and that life will continue to have meaning and dignity.</p>
<p>Health professionals state that they now have resources that give structure to their professional relationships, avoid gaps and prevent crises.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fairbank, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.26</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.26</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Making difficult conversations easier: the cards, the kit and the quill]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>73</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/73-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Family members' views and experiences of discussing preferences and wishes for end-of-life care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/73-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>This study is part of a larger cross-sectional study exploring the views of people affected by lung cancer about their experiences of discussing preferences and wishes for end of life care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and method</st>
<p>19 family members (16 women, 3 men) took part in single, joint and group interviews conducted between: 2006 and 2008. Participants were mainly from lower socio-economic classes in the north of England, UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>The main findings were that family members supported the person with lung cancer to &lsquo;carry on as normal&rsquo;, which included continuing routine activities, planning holidays and special celebrations. They experienced emotional upset following disclosure of the person's prognosis and expressed feelings of loneliness and isolation when their needs for information about the future were not fulfilled. They also expressed the fear of being seen as &lsquo;disloyal&rsquo; by the person with lung cancer if they initiated the conversation about plans for end of life care. Family members supported the person with lung cancer in practical planning for the future such as planning funerals, wills and financial plans. They had their own needs for practical planning in relation to sourcing equipment and services for the future to support them in their caring role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Health and social care professionals conducting advance care planning (ACP) need to consider the needs of family members about discussing preferences and wishes for end of life care, which may be different to those living with cancer. ACP interventions should be developed to meet the needs of both patients and their family members.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Horne, G., Seymour, J., Payne, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.27</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.27</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Lung cancer (oncology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Lung cancer (respiratory medicine), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Family members' views and experiences of discussing preferences and wishes for end-of-life care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>73</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/73-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative care: improving care at the coalface]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/73-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>NSAP is a quality improvement program available for all specialist palliative care services across Australia. It enables services to engage in continuous quality improvement through self assessment against the Palliative Care Australia standards for providing quality palliative care for all Australians, action plan development and implementation, as well as peer mentorship.</p>
<p>This presentation will provide an analysis of the self assessment reports received prior to 30 June, 2010, a total of 69 reports. Considering the overall priority for improvement data and the 957 action items provided by these reports, it is clear that national priorities are focused on three key areas:<l type="ord"><li><p>Skill development in continuous quality improvement</p>
</li><li>
<p>Care planning (incorporating assessment)</p>
</li><li>
<p>Support for carers.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>This analysis foreshadows a real opportunity to develop processes for working collaboratively across these core areas for improvement based on an emerging understanding of the needs of the sector, in addition to supporting system level change to enable improvement in palliative care for patients and their families/carers. NSAP has commenced a project focusing on two of the above key areas (skill development in continuous quality improvement and care planning) as a starting point. In addition to this, further analysis of data available to NSAP will continue as the aggregated data set grows with ongoing submission of self assessments.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giugni, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.28</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.28</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative care: improving care at the coalface]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>74</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/74-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Creating a Volunteer Training Program to support the Advance Care Planning Process]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/74-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The ageing population and the increasing need advance care planning (ACP) increase the need to bring ACP to the community's attention. Limited resources led us to develop a group of volunteers to raise public awareness through group presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To create and pilot a structured volunteer program using a professional volunteer workforce to provide ACP education to community and outpatient groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Process</st>
<p>A needs analysis was completed, along with identification of gaps within our service. A volunteer selection, screening and training program were developed. The key themes addressed in the training include:</p>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> ACP</p>
</li><li>
<p> Public speaking</p>
</li><li>
<p> Answering difficult questions</p>
</li><li>
<p> Using available resources</p>
</li><li>
<p> Processes of coordinated ACP.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Following training, volunteers began presentations to service clubs (eg Rotary, Apex), church groups and hospital rehabilitation programs. Evaluation on each stage of the project occurred. Ongoing support and performance assessment of volunteers occurred to maintain quality standards and ensure presentations remain focused on ACP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This pilot project demonstrates the ability to create, within existing infrastructure, a volunteer program to deliver the ACP message to the community. This process has highlighted a broader potential for volunteers to facilitate specific ACP assistance. The community ownership of the volunteer program means that the ACP needs of the community are being heard and addressed and solutions are being created from within the community.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Renton, J., Detering, K., Fletcher, J., Davis, J., Silvester, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Screening (epidemiology), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Creating a Volunteer Training Program to support the Advance Care Planning Process]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>74</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>74</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/74-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Government inquiries: why bother?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/74-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Like many other nations, Australia is seeking to improve both the level of integration of delivery of health care, and better address the health needs of its people through significant health system reform. Invariably the reform process is dotted with consultations, discussion papers and numerous opportunities to respond to semi-developed concepts through the mechanism of written submissions.</p>
<p>Preparing a written submission is a time consuming process for both individual practitioners who have an interest, and small NGOs with limited staff and diverse demands on their time.</p>
<p>Despite competing priorities, Palliative Care Australia has found that the process of carefully preparing written submissions, accompanied by various mechanisms of advocacy, provides considerable opportunity to achieve systemic improvement of access to, and delivery of, end of life care.</p>
<p>The primary example used in this presentation will address the current Productivity Commission inquiry into Caring for Older Australians, although other relevant inquiries, such as the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission and the Advanced Care Directives inquiry will also be addressed.</p>
<p>In each of these cases, explanation will be provided of successful techniques to ensure that messages supporting improved palliative care are conveyed to key decision makers such as politicians and governmental policy creators. Mechanisms discussed include collaboration with like-minded organisations to both pool resources and boost impact, ensuring that the needs of the membership base are met, the importance of robust and evidence based material and the value of direct lobbying.</p>
<p>All reports from current significant inquiries in Australia are now addressing palliative care. Late 2010 saw the Senate strongly supporting a motion to improve funding and access.</p>
<p>It is definitely worth responding to government inquiries &ndash; but just writing a letter is simply not enough.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luxford, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Government inquiries: why bother?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>74</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>74</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/74-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using former carers in training staff]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/74-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>There are major problems in end-of-life care for people with dementia.</p>
<p>Staff and relatives, particularly in care home settings (where often a significant majority of residents with dementia lack capacity), can find discussion about end of life care especially difficult to bring up. Difficulties relating to mental capacity and the often unpredictable decline with dementia in the last few months mean that dementia-specific approaches need to be developed to meet the needs of people with dementia and their families.</p>
<p>This project recruited former carers, who had looked after a relative with dementia until they died, to aid staff and relatives in discussing advance care planning.</p>
<p>This presentation discusses the recruitment process and the training needs identified by the carers themselves. A detailed description of their work in the care homes and also in staff training will be discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burleigh, S., Thompsell, A., Prior, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Memory disorders (psychiatry), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using former carers in training staff]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>74</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>75</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/75-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What do journalists think about end-of-life care and advance care planning? A media insider's account of reporting from the front line of the end-of-life care debate in Australia]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/75-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Australia has a unique history in its experience with end of life care. It was the first place in the world to &ndash; briefly- legalise euthanasia. But there has been minimal public debate about Advance Care Planning (ACP) and very little media attention.</p>
<p>This presentation aims to take delegates behind the headlines and into the real world of editorial decision making that determines what is- and what isn't- news worthy when it comes to generating or responding to stories about dying with dignity.</p>
<p>You will hear what it is really like as a reporter to write about this complex and ethically challenging area of social policy within the confines of an industry that views the world in black and white.</p>
<p>Is ACP simply not sexy enough for mainstream media or are there lessons to be learned from the pro-euthanasia lobby whose tactics have been so successful in helping to shape the end of life care debate in Australia?</p>
<p>As a former senior journalist at Australia's leading newspapers,the presenter has written from all vantage points on the subject. She will take delegates through some of those stories and the people behind them.</p>
<p>The presentation will illustrate why it is imperative for health professionals working in ACP to make time and muster the courage to take journalists into their world if they really want to make a positive difference to the way we all die.</p>
<p>The media principles to be discussed have a global application.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davies, J., Silvester, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Assisted dying, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What do journalists think about end-of-life care and advance care planning? A media insider's account of reporting from the front line of the end-of-life care debate in Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>75</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/75-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Handing over the reins - establishing long term strategies for embedding advance care planning in rural and remote communities in Australia]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/75-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Establishing effective advance care planning (ACP) implementation programs in communities is challenging at the best of times &ndash; but when the region extends to over 166 000 square kilometres of rural and remote country, and human resources are limited, strategies need to have the &lsquo;wow&rsquo; factor in order to ensure sustainability.</p>
<p>In 2009, a project to introduce ACP was set up in southern NSW as part of a state wide approach. Since that time, much has happened, including structural reform at state level resulting in changes in regional boundaries, cessation of funding for the continuation of the project and the worst floods in 70 years!</p>
<p>In order to ensure the sustainability of the program, the last year has seen a shift from &lsquo;implementation&rsquo; of ACP to a &lsquo;handing over the reins&rsquo; approach. Various activities have been introduced to consolidate ACP at a local level. These have included working with health managers to embed ACP in quality improvement and risk management activities, creating links with local divisions of general practice and with community groups, working with staff and residents in aged care facilities, establishing a range of accessible resources for health professionals, and passing on responsibility for education to local educators and clinicians.</p>
<p>The presentation will demonstrate that evidence is mounting regarding the effectiveness of these strategies in moving ACP from &lsquo;project&rsquo; status to being embedded as an important component in ensuring effective health delivery.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashley, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Handing over the reins - establishing long term strategies for embedding advance care planning in rural and remote communities in Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Wednesday 22 June 2011-Concurrent Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>75</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/75-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Eastern world view of advance care planning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/75-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A study of 300 cancer patients in Hong Kong shows that 92% of patients include themselves in decision-making, while 71% include their family and 65% their doctor. 68 percent of patients who include themselves in decision-making prefer to do so jointly with others; 55% want to join both the doctor and family to form a triad; 13% want decision-making with the family as a dyad and exclude the doctor; only 3% want a decision-making dyad with the doctor without their family. Less than 5% of patients want decision-making by &lsquo;doctor-alone&rsquo;, &lsquo;patient-doctor&rsquo; or &lsquo;doctor-family&rsquo; dyads and &lt;1% of patients desire decision-making by &lsquo;family-alone&rsquo;.</p>
<p>In this study, only 25% patients have discussed their post-competent treatment preferences with other people; 93% patients have never heard of AD, and 25% refuse to discuss AD. After explaining AD to patients who are willing to talk about it, patients agree that AD would protect their autonomy in their post-competent treatment choices. Yet, two-third of patients refuse to sign an AD instantly, and prefer to leave oral instructions to specify their post-competent treatment preferences. Among patients who refuse to sign an AD, 42% want their family to make decisions when they become incompetent. It seems that Chinese cancer patients only rely on their family in their post-competent decision-making, but refuse to delegate decision-making to their family when they are still competent. The implications of these findings will be discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hui, E. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Eastern world view of advance care planning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Plenary Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>75</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/75-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of advance care planning - a European perspective]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/75-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Advance Care Planning (ACP) can be considered the second stage of a movement which tries to incorporate patient's decisions to end-of-life (EOL) healthcare decisions. The first stage is focused on the development of Advance Directives (ADs). Nowadays there is a broad consensus about the inadequacies of these written documents when they are filled and applied in a bureaucratic manner, disconnected of the clinical context and in absence of a communicative environment. ACP gives this more adequate perspective to the use of ADs and even can do without them because the end, the incorporation of patient's perspectives and wishes in EOL decisions, can be reached by other means. But in my opinion, it is not easy to reach the second stage without going first through the first stage, even doing it in a fast manner. So, the scarce development of ACP approach in Europe is coherent with the scarce development of ADs. The situation of ADs in Europe is characterized by its disparity between the different countries of the Region. We can find countries where specific laws on the issue have been adopted (UK, Austria, Spain, Hungary, Belgium, The Netherlands, Finland, France, Germany) and countries where there is no specific legislation (Greece, Italy, Norway, Bulgaria). But there are significant differences between all these regulations, for example in relation with the binding force of such documents. These differences between European countries help us to understand the great differences between ACP developments. Countries such us UK, Belgium, the Netherlands or Germany, with a strong regulation on ADs are developing the ACP approach in a fast manner. Spain has a particular status: broad legal development with low clinical impact and scarce development of ACP.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of advance care planning - a European perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Plenary Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>76</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/76-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using stages of planning to improve the success of advance care planning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/76-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>What we mean by &lsquo;advance directives&rsquo;, in the United States has been largely determined by the creation of laws and regulations. The unintended consequence of this approach has been the creation of advance directives as one-time, singular events intended to be effective for all individuals regardless of age, stage of health, or changing goals and values. The literature in the USA has clearly demonstrated the failure of this legalistic approach.</p>
<p>Advance care planning (ACP) as a process of communication has emerged as an alternative to this failed approach. However, ACP is not a &lsquo;one size fits all&rsquo; intervention. It is unrealistic and unhelpful to expect individuals to make healthcare decisions that will apply to all situations that may happen for some future point in time. Rather, ACP is more effective when it is focused on the individual's stage of health and the realistic decisions that may be needed for that stage. This staged approach to planning includes person-centred interactions and shared decision-making with professionals who are well trained in a standardized approach.</p>
<p>In this presentation the speaker will discuss the advantages of one approach to the stages of planning, described as First (ie, basic ACP for the healthy adult), Next (ie, disease-specific ACP for progressive chronic illness with complications), and Last Steps (ie, those expected to die in the next 12 months). This stage of planning approach makes it possible to identify the content of planning relevant for the person at each stage, when to do it, how to document it and how to train professionals to competently assist in the planning process. Quality improvement activities can be specifically designed to evaluate if the goals of planning are achieved.</p>
<p>This staged approach to planning is individualized and realistic. It builds care planning into the routines of care, enhances person-centred decision-making and provides a system for reviewing and updating plans over time. It is more likely an individual's goals and values will be known and respected.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hammes, B. J., Briggs, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using stages of planning to improve the success of advance care planning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Plenary Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>76</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>76</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/76-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance Care Planning: A Community Engagement Value Based Approach]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/76-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This workshop focuses on the design and ongoing implementation of an innovative advance care planning (ACP) initiative in one Canadian Health Authority. The initiative took a values based, community engagement approach to developing an ACP program in two communities. Developmental evaluation systematically informs the emerging programs. The initiative is in its second year and successes to date include: a shift in the relationship between the health authority and participating communities in response to a new way of &lsquo;doing business&rsquo; where change is not mandated from the &lsquo;top down&rsquo; but emerges &lsquo;in the middle&rsquo; through active collaborative engagement; capacity development within both the health authority organizational team and the participating communities; a community specific vision of ACP that is broader than health care decision making; and, a comprehensive education program for ACP facilitators. This innovative approach has been challenging to enact in a system where a traditional policy based orientation to program development and outcomes based evaluation are the norm. Instead, success has been determined via real time decision making that aligns with the values framework underpinning the project. Multiple course corrections have occurred such as adopting developmental evaluation and moving away from an evaluative logic model. The responsive, values based process will be discussed, strengths and challenges identified and successes highlighted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robinson, C., Fulton, T., Collins, D., Lacasse, B., Wren, A. M., Myers, L., Nicol, J., Thompson, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance Care Planning: A Community Engagement Value Based Approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>76</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>76</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/76-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Australian state's experience of implementing advance care planning: snapshots from Victorian health services]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/76-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The structured, supported platform provided by the Respecting Patient Choices program has been the foundation and precursor to the development of innovative and responsive Advance Care Planning (ACP) models that address the varied needs of our diverse population.</p>
<p>The introduction of ACP in Victoria has initially been through our health services and via the Respecting Patient Choices program. Austin Health, a major metropolitan health service was able to put a compelling case to the Victorian Government to introduce the Respecting Patient Choices program into our health services, with eight health services currently participating and with Austin Health mentoring and supporting implementation.</p>
<p>This structured approach has had many benefits in terms of lessons learnt and has been the springboard for innovation in the development and evolution of ACP implementation and has allowed Victoria to explore and support a range of innovative approaches to implementing ACP.</p>
<p>A series of semi structured interviews with ACP Clinical Leads and Program Managers from a range of Victorian health services identifies the models of ACP implementation, key learnings, outcomes and ongoing challenges that are influencing current and future program direction.</p>
<p>The data is informing the body of evidence relating to ACP implementation and provides useful guidance for the development of:<l type="tab"><li><p> ACP programs, in terms of translating ACP into local environments and adopting and adapting to address local needs;</p>
</li><li>
<p> key performance indicators;</p>
</li><li>
<p> an evaluation framework; and</p>
</li><li>
<p> policy to drive and support ACP.</p>
</li></l></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doran, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Australian state's experience of implementing advance care planning: snapshots from Victorian health services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>76</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>77</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/77-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ACP at Barwon health - a community program in a Victorian regional health service]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/77-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Barwon Health's (BH) community sector has been the focus of the Respecting Patient Choices (RPC) program implementation as it was considered that treatment decisions were best made in the non-acute phase of a person's illness.</p>
<p>The initial aim was to provide advance care planning (ACP) for patients with chronic illness participating in formal programs including the Hospital Admission Risk Program (CHF &amp; COPD clients), Renal Services, Palliative Care Services and Aged Care. The acute site wards where these patients were likely to be admitted were also included in the initial phase of implementation.</p>
<p>It became evident that as partners of patients and others in the community heard about the program, there were more individuals wanting to complete ACP's. This group of relatively well, &lsquo;non-patients&rsquo; had a high completion rate of ACP documents (80%).</p>
<p>As a result, strong links have been established with the local General Practice Association, General Practices, private hospitals and other health service providers. A public launch was held to raise awareness and the service was extended to provide access to ACP for all BH patients and the wider community.</p>
<p>Process and systems are in place to provide follow up of patients post introduction, consultation, audit, electronic alerts and review. ACP documents are accessible to provide information to family and health care providers.</p>
<p>Data collection and IT capabilities at BH have been useful for both reporting requirements and to identify potential patients and areas requiring ongoing focus.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mann, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.39</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.39</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ACP at Barwon health - a community program in a Victorian regional health service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>77</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>77</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/77-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Making Person Centred Care A Reality]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/77-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This workshop will showcase innovative work that was led by Helen Sanderson Associates, which culminated in developing &lsquo;Living Well: Thinking and Planning for the End of Your Life&rsquo;. This work brought together Hull City Council Adult Social Care, Humber and Yorkshire Coast Cancer Network, City Healthcare Partnership, Macmillan, Hull Churches Home from Hospital, Dove House Hospice, patients and carers to consider how person centred thinking tools could be used within a patients journey to increase the quality of their experience of palliative and end of life care.</p>
<p>One example of its practical implementation is Edna. Edna is an older person who has dementia. By training and supporting staff in using the tools in their conversations with Edna and her family, staff have gained a better insight into who she is as an individual, her preferences, beliefs and care needs. We have mapped Edna's clinical journey and identified where these tools will provide information to inform health and social care professionals to understand what is important to Edna and what best support looks like.</p>
<p>This work is an innovative mechanism for working across health, social care and the third sector. The work adds to what is already known, by providing a method for gathering person centred information that can be used in Advance Care Planning to ensure the care provided is the best possible quality for that individual and their carer. Overall, this workshop will provide a clear example of how person-centred care can be achieved in current service provision.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wigley, L., Bailey, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.40</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.40</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Memory disorders (psychiatry), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Making Person Centred Care A Reality]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>77</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>77</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/77-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance directive (Living Will) completion and intention of completion rates in Alberta]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/77-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Canadian provinces have had laws for 10 years to guide developing and use of advance directives (living wills). Although laws reflect public preferences, living will completion rates have been identified as low. A public survey in Alberta Canada was done for information on current living will completion or intention rates. The University of Alberta's Population Research Laboratory was asked to add questions to their annual telephone survey. This survey is carefully conducted for correct population proportions and results highly (95%) representative of all persons aged 18+. In May-July 2010, 1203 were surveyed and 43.6% reported having a current living will and 42.1% reported thinking about or planning one; 14.3% said they did not need or want one. Significant differences across population sub-groups were found, with higher completion rates among persons who had been involved in a decision to stop or not start life support, had cared for a dying person, had a close family member or friend who died, had been involved in a decision to put a pet or another animal down, described themselves as religious, were over age 64 and were married or divorced/widowed. Albertans have a relatively high rate of completion and intention of completion, with factors having lead to this state of interest. With the number of deaths expected to double in the future, and with public experience of death and dying increasing, living will completion rates could increase. This information should be taken into consideration for future developments in advanced care planning and end-of-life care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson, D., Cohen, J., Aliyar, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.41</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.41</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance directive (Living Will) completion and intention of completion rates in Alberta]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>77</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>78</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/78-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A complex regional intervention to implement Advance Care Planning in one town's nursing homes: results of and lessons learned from a controlled inter-regional feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/78-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In Germany, recent legislation confirms that advance directives (ADs) have to be followed if they apply to the medical situation, but regional implementation of advance care planning (ACP) has not yet been described.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In a longitudinal controlled study, we compared 1 intervention region (4 nursing homes (n/hs), altogether 421 residents) with two control regions (2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>5 n/hs, altogether 985 residents). Resident inclusion went from 1 Febraury 2009 to 30 June 2009, observation lasted until 30 June 2010. Primary endpoint is the prevalence of ADs at follow-up, 17 (12) months after the first (last) possible inclusion. Secondary endpoints compare relevance of ADs, involvement of general practitioners (validity), process quality and clinical outcomes. The regional multifaceted intervention on the basis of the US program Respecting Choices, beizeiten begleiten, addressed the related caregiver network.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 1406 residents reported to live in the 14 n/hs plus an estimated turnover of 176 residents until the last possible inclusion date, 645 (41%) were willing to participate. Response rates were 38% in the intervention region and 42% in the control region. Non-responder analysis shows an equal distribution of sex and age but a bias towards dependency on nursing care in the responder group. Analysis of outcome data will be completed by May.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>To our knowledge, this feasibility study is the first to implement a comprehensive ACP approach to regional n/hs and the related caregiver network in a controlled design. System factors are identified that seemed to promote / impede implementation of the ACP program and that may inspire further research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[in der Schmitten, J., Rotharmel, J. S., Rixen, S., Hammes, B., Briggs, L., Wegscheider, K., Marckmann, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.42</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.42</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A complex regional intervention to implement Advance Care Planning in one town's nursing homes: results of and lessons learned from a controlled inter-regional feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>78</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>78</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/78-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[It's my life: influences on advance care planning conversations]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/78-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>As part of a doctoral research study 20 hospice patients responded to an invitation to participate in a video interview to discuss their influences on discussing end of life wishes and preferences. 15 participants were interviewed.<l type="tab"><li><p> 2 withdrew after reading the information sheet.</p>
</li><li>
<p> 1 retrospectively withdrew consent.</p>
</li><li>
<p> 1 died before participation.</p>
</li><li>
<p> 1 did not meet the sample criteria.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The findings indicate participants:<l type="tab"><li><p>(a) Can feel processed through an end of life check list to make decisions where they are given the decisions and then asked to think rather than think and decide.</p>
</li><li>
<p>(b) Do not always discuss issues with those closest to them because of a desire to protect them.</p>
</li><li>
<p>(c) Are not always willing to make advance care planning decisions not because they are unaware of their illness but because they do not feel resilient to face the emotional impact of their choices as well as being within the advance care planning process of; (1) consideration of wishes and preferences, (2) discussion, (3) discussion and decision making, (4) decision making and documentation, (5) communication and implementation.</p>
</li><li>
<p>(d) Are willing to discuss end of life wishes and preferences when conversations are empathetic, at their pace and as part of an ongoing process.</p>
</li></l></p>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Health care professionals should value the consideration and discussion part of advance care planning as the vehicle and support mechanism for decision making outcomes. A reductionist, tick box approach to advance care planning can enable participants to feel processed through rather than participating in advance care planning discussions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.43</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.43</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[It's my life: influences on advance care planning conversations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>78</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>78</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/78-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Redefining the temporal framework for end-of-life planning: the planful self-advocacy model]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/78-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper offers a conceptual framework to help contextualize end of life planning and expand its temporal dimensions. Traditional orientations to plan for end of life are focused on advance directives, primarily dealing with removal of invasive life sustaining interventions during the weeks, days or hours prior to death. Such planning has not been successful in achieving its intended goals. The ascendance of the palliative care movement in many regions of the world allows for recognizing the importance of maximizing comfort, offering social support and respecting spiritual and existential needs for meaningfulness close to the end of life. Our framework of &lsquo;Planful Self-Advocacy&rsquo; is focused on the value and promotion of proactive patient self-advocacy for eliciting responsive health care long before the patient reaches the end of life. Consideration of options for planful action as people reach old age, or as they are diagnosed with life limiting chronic illness, are presented. These options include organizing informal supports for times of need, planning environmental modifications, establishing long term relationships with health care professionals who are willing to serve as patient advocates, learning about desirable long term care options and using technology to help counteract shrinking life space near the end of life. Data from our ongoing study of elders nearing the final years of life will be used to explore the relationships between model elements.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kahana, E., Kahana, B., Lovegreen, L., Kahana, J., Brown, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Redefining the temporal framework for end-of-life planning: the planful self-advocacy model]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>78</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>78</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/79-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance care planning for GLBTI people: results of a state-wide survey]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/79-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Increasing evidence suggests that many gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex (GLBTI) people are being denied their legal rights at the end-of-life. A 2009 study in Northern NSW (presented 2010 ACPEL Conference) found evidence of active discrimination and abuse of GLBTI people.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A State-wide hard copy and on-line survey and in-depth interviews were undertaken.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>305 useable questionnaires were returned; questionnaire distribution was via Newsletter &amp; websites so a response rate could not be determined.</p>
<p>The majority of respondents were open to all significant others; just over half were in a relationship; 77% had been in their relationship for 4 years or more.</p>
<p>Most respondents had high levels of education and income above that of the general population. Only 21% rated their health as Fair or Poor, while 53% said it was excellent or very good.</p>
<p>Knowledge of/Experience with advance care planning (ACP) options was variable; most respondents did not understand the law relating to ACP. Few had discussed their end-of-life wishes with their doctor or significant others.</p>
<p>Those who were not out to significant others, had lower education and income and poorer health, are at greatest risk of inadequate care and not having their end of life wishes respected.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>As many GLBTI people are ageing, there is an urgent need for focussed education for GLBTI people about legally available ACP options and resources. Findings from this study and the pilot have resulted in a new GLBTI-specific ACP resource booklet.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Funding</st>
<p>Study funded by Law and Justice Foundation of NSW.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cartwright, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health policy, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Health service research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance care planning for GLBTI people: results of a state-wide survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>79</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/79-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment in Case of Emergency (POLST-E) as an integral part of the patient advance directive: what are nursing home residents' preferences resulting from a facilitated advance care planning process?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/79-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Treatment decisions in emergencies when the patient is (acutely) incapable pose a challenge for nursing and emergency staff, especially if the attending physician and/or the designated proxy are not available. In Germany, advance directives usually provide insufficient guidance for these situations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In a controlled regional intervention study to implement advance care planning (ACP) in one town's nursing homes and the related caregivers' network, we introduced a new form, the POLST-E. It differs from many POLST forms common in the US in two major respects: (1) it is only available as an integral part of a comprehensive advance directive resulting from a facilitated ACP process; (2) its scope is restricted to specific options for emergency treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We presented a descriptive analysis of all POLST-Es completed in the intervention region during the study period, and compare it with any ACP for emergencies found in the control region (data analysis will be completed by May).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The POLST-E bridges the gap between individual planning and honouring the resulting plans in emergency situations by professionals. It therefore is a crucial tool for effective ACP. Further, it changes the facilitation process fundamentally in that patients or proxies are now offered choices with regard to medical emergencies arising from current (not only future hypothetical) health statuses &ndash; a choice missing in the traditional development of advance directives in Germany.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marckmann, G., Rotharmel, J. S., Hammes, B., Briggs, L., Mortsiefer, A., in der Schmitten, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment in Case of Emergency (POLST-E) as an integral part of the patient advance directive: what are nursing home residents' preferences resulting from a facilitated advance care planning process?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>79</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/79-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Promoting advance care planning in Taiwan - a practical approach to Chinese culture]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/79-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In Taiwan, people are deeply influenced by traditional Chinese culture. People do not want to talk about death in daily conversation. Discussing with elders about the death is still a taboo. We need to develop a culture sensitive strategy to promote advance care planning (ACP) in Taiwan society.</p>
<p>The objectives of this study are to develop a community program to promote ACP discussion among elderly people. We conducted four sessions of focus group and a total of 30 volunteers participated in the study from August to November 2010. The major themes of the focus group included the value of life, previous experiences about medical care, and opinions about ACP. The results of the researches suggested that an introduction video &lsquo;The Four Seasons&rsquo; followed by a video about ACP &lsquo;Metaphor of three wise monkeys&rsquo; is most appropriate to motivate ACP discussion in a &lsquo;refuse to talk about death&rsquo; society. The contents of these two videos were in accordance with Chinese culture. Promotional brochure for ACP also developed with specific cultural characteristics. The feasibility and acceptance of the process were assessed by the palliative care experts and the residents in the community.</p>
<p>The ACP programs for local culture can provide culture-sensitive choices and reflections for elders in Taiwan. They are more likely to discuss their own end-of-life decisions through this program.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hsieh, J. G., Wang, Y. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Promoting advance care planning in Taiwan - a practical approach to Chinese culture]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>79</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/79-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding the meaning of end-of-life discussions and related decisions among older South Asians living in East London: a qualitative inquiry]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/79-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>South Asians constitute the single largest ethnic minority group in the United Kingdom, yet little is known about their perspectives and experiences on end of life and its related care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>This paper examines attitudes and expectations that older South Asians expressed towards the discussion of death and dying and decision making.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Five focus groups and 29 in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with total of 55 older adults aged between 52 and 78 years. Participants from six South Asian ethnic groups were recruited from 11 local community organisations. Constructive grounded theory was used as data analysis approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Trust is category that captured views and experiences of participants that consists two key themes. The theme &lsquo;avoidance of discussion&rsquo; relates to the relative absence of discussions around death and dying among participants. Participants neither expected to have discussions about their own death and dying within their family, nor to assume any involvement in related issues of decision making. The second theme &lsquo;locus of authority&rsquo; relates to beliefs and experiences about the delegation of decision making to family members.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Older South Asians living in East London make efforts to adhere to important social and cultural values relating to death and dying, and rebuild and adapt those values during the challenges of living in an emigrant society. Future research should explore the perspectives of second-generation adult children towards end of life care decisions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venkatasalu, M. R., Seymour, J., Arthur, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding the meaning of end-of-life discussions and related decisions among older South Asians living in East London: a qualitative inquiry]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 3</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>80</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/80-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The evolving role of a 'clinical ethicist']]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/80-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Austin health is a 600 bed tertiary hospital with a wide range of acute and sub acute services, including a number of specialist services. Many patients have extremely complex medical and ethical issues that are often raised during the care of these people. In order to address such concerns a &lsquo;clinical ethicist&rsquo;, who is an experienced doctor has been employed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To perform a retrospective audit of consecutive cases referred to the clinical ethicist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>104 patients, mean age 66 (range 19&ndash;102), 64% male were seen.<l type="tab"><li><p> Reason for referral - (&ge;1 reason per patient).<l type="tab"><li><p> Unrealistic patient/family (34%).</p>
</li><li>
<p> Poor or unrealistic medical assessment of situation (53%).</p>
</li><li>
<p> Patient/family in need of advance care planning (44%).</p>
</li></l></p></li><li>
<p> Outcome of referral &ndash; treatment related (&ge; 1 per patient).<l type="tab"><li><p> Patient died or discharged (63%).</p>
</li><li>
<p> Decision to limit treatment (64%).</p>
</li><li>
<p> Advance care planning occurred (45%).</p>
</li><li>
<p> Treating doctors ignored recommendation of clinical ethicist (5%).</p>
</li></l></p></li><li>
<p> Outcome of referral &ndash; people related (&ge;1 per patient).<l type="tab"><li><p> Staff Education (71%).</p>
</li><li>
<p> Improved staff morale (31%).</p>
</li><li>
<p> Support of medical decision making (41%).</p>
</li><li>
<p> Patient/family support (42%).</p>
</li></l></p></li></l></p>
<p>Patient deaths were, on average 70 days (range 1&ndash;619) from initial referral.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Establishment of the clinical ethicist role has provided support and education to staff and patients. Although not specifically set up to focus on end-of-life decision making and care, the majority of patients seen have died. This role also has an important link in referring patients/families for advance care planning.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Detering, K., Silvester, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.49</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.49</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The evolving role of a 'clinical ethicist']]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>80</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>80</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/80-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can advance care planing offer an alternative to people contemplating euthanasia?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/80-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Many patients with terminal illness and progressive loss of control over their bodies explore the option of euthanasia as a means to regain control. Some of these patients are referred by health professionals for advance care planning (ACP). This case study illustrates the difficulties involved.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Case summary</st>
<p>MH had advanced Multi System Atrophy, a terminal disease involving progressive paralysis and pain and was being cared for at a nursing home. At the time of referral to the Respecting Patient Choices (RPC) Program, she was actively seeking advice from voluntary euthanasia organisations, and was exhibiting increasingly severe symptoms of depression as her disease progressed. The psychiatric liaison service viewed the initiation of involuntary treatment as inappropriate in this context. At this point a referral to the RPC program was made. ACP was conducted with MH, and she and her family completed an ACP including the appointment of a substitute decision maker, and the completion of a refusal of treatment certificate. MH was subsequently admitted to a specialist palliative care unit, where she died shortly after admission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This case touches on a number of issues around requests for hastened death, demonstrates a failure of terminal care provision and highlights the need for ACP at the time of diagnosis or early in the course of a terminal illness. Even at a late stage, ACP provided MH with information regarding her treatment options and allowed her to gain a sense of control over aspects of her treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Case summary</st>
<p>MH had been diagnosed with Multi System Atrophy, a terminal disease involving progressive paralysis and pain, 6 years prior to referral and was being cared for at a nursing home. At the time of referral to the RPC Program, Austin Health, Melbourne, she was suicidal, was actively seeking advice from voluntary euthanasia organisations, and had been assessed by the psychiatric liaison service as meeting the diagnostic criteria for major depression. The psychiatric consensus was against initiating involuntary treatment. At this point a referral to the RPC program was made. An ACP Clinician met with MH and her family to assist her to complete an advance care plan including the appointment of a substitute decision maker and the completion of a refusal of treatment certificate. She was also informed of her right to refuse further medical treatment. MH was subsequently referred, and admitted, to a specialist palliative care unit, where she died within 24 h of admission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This case demonstrates a failure of terminal care provision and highlights the need for ACP at the time of diagnosis. Even at a late stage ACP offered an alternative to euthanasia in a situation where she and her family felt that they had no other options.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fullam, R., Hancock, A., Detering, K., Davies, J., Silvester, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.50</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.50</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pain (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Mood disorders (including depression), Assisted dying, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can advance care planing offer an alternative to people contemplating euthanasia?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>80</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>81</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/81-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing guidance in ACP for health and social care staff: experiences from the UK]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/81-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In the UK, advance decisions to refuse treatment have been legalised under the Mental Capacity Act of 2005. They are one aspect of the wider process of advance care planning (ACP). A process of consultation during 2007 led to guidance for ACP being developed for health and social care professionals working in England (second edition published in 2008) by the National End of Life Care Programme which has been widely used for education and practice development. Debates about ACP in England subsequent to publication of this guidance has drawn attention to a number of areas of confusion and disagreement which could impede the development of practice in ACP. These include debates about whether ACP should be focused on preparation for future loss of capacity or whether its scope should be broader. These debates are mirrored in the research literature. This presentation reports work undertaken to revise and refine the guidance to address these areas and to promote a broad consensus across experts in the field and front line staff. The exercise to develop this guidance sheds new light on some of the challenges of addressing potentially divergent perspectives at a policy level and on issues to be considered when providing practical guidance in a complex field to underpin ACP practice and education on the front line.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seymour, J., Henry, C., Sherwen, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.51</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.51</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing guidance in ACP for health and social care staff: experiences from the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>81</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/81-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introduction to the national (England) end of life care intelligence network website]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/81-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The National End of Life Care Intelligence Network and its website were launched in June 2010. It is a national resource for policy makers and planners and providers of End of Life care as well as researchers, media and the public. The aim is to bring together in one easily accessible place evidence on End of Life Care particularly using data sources. The website (<A HREF="http://www.endoflifecare-intelligence.org.uk/home.aspx">http://www.endoflifecare-intelligence.org.uk/home.aspx</A>) has several domains: Local profiles by Local Authority (numbers and rates of deaths by major cause, age and place of death); Reports (Deaths In Older Adults in England; Variations In Place of Death in England; Deaths Registered as Occurring &lsquo;Elsewhere&rsquo;; External Causes of Death); A compendium of data sources; Advice and information &ndash; signposting for patients, their relatives and carers; Email alerts &ndash; sign up to receive regular information; News and events &ndash; keep up-to-date with developments. It is planned to expand the functionality by links with academic partners to bring more of the research evidence together with the routine data analyses. The concept is new and innovative and has already been widely acclaimed as a useful resource for all those working in the End of Life Care field. Commissioners and providers are actively using the website to inform changes in care at a local level. National outputs are informing the development of National Policy.</p>
<p>There is no other web-based resource which is similar. It provides a completely new approach to accessing National and Local information. The website and its functionality will be demonstrated to show how its use can advance knowledge and understanding of the quality of End of Life Care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[South, J. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.52</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.52</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introduction to the national (England) end of life care intelligence network website]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>81</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/81-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Core principles and guidance in relation to CPR status]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/81-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The End of Life Care Strategy (DH 2008) highlights the importance, within Care Planning, of clear and appropriate discussion and decisions about CPR. These decisions may change over time with clinical deterioration and/or therapeutic reversibility. One point at which this becomes critical is when a patient moves between care settings for example, with some clinical crisis or when care is delivered better elsewhere.</p>
<p>Currently, while organisations have crafted their own policies, small but critical variations exist, together with the assumption that &lsquo;our policy ends at our front door&rsquo;. This has profound implications for transport and receiving services because this hiatus, for anyone in transit who does not want CPR, will inevitably make them vulnerable to inappropriate intervention. This can be overcome by harmonising CPR policies between partner organisations or across localities to ensure that there are clear ways in which people are managed when being moved.</p>
<p>There are excellent examples of work nationally including the Unified Policy being implemented across South Central SHA, DNACPR Principles from South East Coast SHA, and the unified policy being developed within the East of England SHA.</p>
<p>The National End of Life Care programme has scoped current work with key partners to produce a set of Core Principles and guidance for managing the intersection of policies where unification has not or cannot yet be achieved. This is aimed at organisations wishing to work together to ensure that policies connect to achieve smooth transition for the individual that safeguards choice, reduces unwanted and unnecessary attempts at resuscitation and promotes a dignified death.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[George, R., Sherwen, E., Regnard, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.53</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.53</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Interventional cardiology, End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Core principles and guidance in relation to CPR status]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>81</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/81-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pattern of hospital admission in the final year of life]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/81-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study examines the patterns of hospital care received in the final year of life for the disease groups; cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD), respiratory and stroke. This will inform policy around End of Life Care pathways and costing models for hospitals.</p>
<p>Our study moves beyond the historical cross-sectional approach, directly linking hospital records to individual death records. The Office of National Statistics (ONS) and Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) linkage provides a longitudinal view of the hospital services received 12 months before death. Using this linked data we have investigated the frequency, length and type of admission (elective, emergency) received.</p>
<p>Our cohort includes individuals that died in England 2004&ndash;2008 and had at least one admission to hospital in the final year of life. We analysed how this varied with underlying cause of death, age, gender, deprivation and Local Authority (LA) of residence.</p>
<p>Our study found that 78% of all ONS deaths had at least one hospital admission in the year before death; 88% of cancer deaths and 66% of CVD deaths had an admission. The average number of admissions a person will have in the final year of life is 3.5, this varies from Cancer deaths at 5.1 admissions to Stroke deaths with 2.3 admissions. The average number of bed days in the final year of life is 29.7; 36 days for stroke deaths and 18.1 days for CVD. The average length of stay in the final year of life is 8.5 days; 15.7 days for stroke and 5.7 days for Cancer deaths.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lyons, P., Verne, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.54</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.54</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Drugs: cardiovascular system, Stroke, End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pattern of hospital admission in the final year of life]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>82</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/82-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The legal status of guardians in advance care planning in Australia]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/82-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Australia, like many countries, is currently debating the optimum means of permitting individuals to engage in advance care planning within the confines of our respective legal systems.</p>
<p>&lsquo;No decision without me&rsquo; is a message in accord with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons Disabilities. This convention is an important consideration for our legal systems in developing means of validating people's advance care planning wishes. It also brings with it great challenges for guardians as substitute decision makers when called upon to engage in advance care planning.</p>
<p>These themes will be the focus of a presentation outlining:<l type="tab"><li><p> Current recognition status of advance care planning in Australian jurisdictions;</p>
</li><li>
<p> The debate for the need for new legislation in Australia to give recognition and framework to advance care planning;</p>
</li><li>
<p> The challenges facing appointed guardians called upon to engage in advance care planning, the limitations on their authority and the impact of the UN Convention; and</p>
</li><li>
<p> The importance of developing uniform language when engaging in advance care planning to enhance legal validity and community acceptance &ndash; an examination of the current development of an Australian national framework for advance care planning.</p>
</li></l></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schyvens, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.55</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.55</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The legal status of guardians in advance care planning in Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>82</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>82</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/82-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance care planning in dementia: great in theory, a challenge in practice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/82-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Advance care planning (ACP) allows people to record their wishes about future health care choices before their capacity is lost; in dementia, where capacity loss is inevitable, ACP has the potential to facilitate a person-centred care approach to care. This study explored the views of both professionals and people with dementia and their families about how, and if, ACP is implemented in dementia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Focus groups (n=14) and one-to-one interviews (n=17) were used to explore the views of a wide range of professionals (health and social care, advocacy and legal services) involved in dementia care; 1&ndash;1 interviews were carried out with people with dementia (n=17) and their main carers (n=29).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>ACP is not routinely integrated into dementia services although some examples of good practice exist. Contrary to guidance, ACP discussions often occur late in the illness, with subsequent proxy decision-making. Professionals find ACP challenging; there appear to be additional difficulties in dementia around responsibility, assessment of capacity and legal dilemmas. People with dementia and their families do plan ahead in many areas for example, making wills and lasting power of attorney for finance. However, making plans for future healthcare appears more difficult due to a preference to &lsquo;take one day at a time&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ACP offers opportunities for people to plan ahead but is currently not a routine part of dementia care. Additional training for professionals may help overcome some of the barriers and hence support the people with dementia and their families who do wish to undertake this.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robinson, L., Dickinson, C., Bamford, C., Exley, C., Hughes, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.56</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.56</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Memory disorders (neurology), Memory disorders (psychiatry)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance care planning in dementia: great in theory, a challenge in practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>82</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>82</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/82-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing planning for the future in a memory service]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/82-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Modernisation Initiative End of Life Care Programme aim is to achieve excellent end of life care for all in Lambeth and Southwark, including those with dementia and their carers.</p>
<p>Earlier diagnosis of dementia can enable the person affected to indicate their future care and treatment preferences through completing a future care plan. Later, in the more advanced stages of dementia, there may be deterioration in cognitive functioning which affects people's capacity to express their wishes.</p>
<p>Prior to the intervention, the views and opinions were sought from service users and staff. These were of the usefulness of the intervention, the questions in the document as well as style and language.</p>
<p>An implementation study was set up to deliver future care planning to people who received a diagnosis of dementia though a new memory service.</p>
<p>The Nurse Advisor developed and delivered training for mental health care professionals in future care planning using interactive forum theatre and role play. This training was conducted and evaluated as part of the induction of a new memory service as well as to Community Mental Health teams for older adults.</p>
<p>Following training, facilitation and role modelling by the Nurse Advisor, people with dementia were offered the opportunity to plan for their future. Staff were supported in reflective learning sessions.</p>
<p>Following ethical approval, the researcher conducted interviews with people with dementia and their families to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of the future care planning conversations and their feelings about these conversations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burleigh, S., Poppe, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.57</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.57</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Memory disorders (psychiatry), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing planning for the future in a memory service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>82</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>82</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/83-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The cost-benefits of end-of-life training in care homes with dementia patients]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/83-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>An education and training initiative took place in 2006 in Greater Manchester for staff in five local care homes.</p>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The aim was to improve the quality of end-of-life (EoL) care for older people with dementia, through the use of established EoL care tools, including advance care planning. As part of a full evaluation, an economic appraisal examined the activity, outcomes and finances.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data was collected on patients from the homes that died in the year before and the year after the initiative. The activity and costs of training and direct support to the homes were collected, with cost-benefit analyses subsequently undertaken.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The full evaluation showed many resultant quality benefits: improved communication between nursing, care and medical staff; better symptom management; and, support for family members and carers.</p>
<p>The proportion of patients that died in their preferred place of death increased from 48% to 63% following the initiative. Advance care plans were in place for 83% of those dying in the care homes, but none of those dying in hospital. The LCP was used for 67% of those dying in the care homes.</p>
<p>A cost-beneficial approach is affordable, but PCTs cannot expect cash savings, to fund education and training programmes, unless there are associated reductions in admissions to hospital, which is a primary aim of the Gold Standards Framework.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref></p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The analyses evidenced that training care home staff in EoL care tools is affordable and cost-beneficial, and quantified key variations relating to whether patients had advance care plans.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gandy, R., Roe, B., McClelland, B., Ashton, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.58</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.58</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health policy, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Memory disorders (psychiatry), End of life decisions (ethics), Health economics, Health service research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The cost-benefits of end-of-life training in care homes with dementia patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>83</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/83-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[New insights into place of death for people with Alzheimer's disease, dementia and senility]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/83-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Between 2001 and 2009, 15% of all deaths in England had a mention (ie, either an underlying or contributory mortality coding) of Alzheimer's disease, dementia or senility. Over this period there was a 57% increase in the number of mentions from these conditions.</p>
<p>This analysis specifically examined the age and sex distributions and places of death for each of these conditions, by whether they were coded as underlying or contributory causes of death. Major differences were found in age distribution, gender balance and place of death across these conditions, and there was also marked variations across these factors according to whether the conditions were recorded as underlying or contributory.</p>
<p>The analysis then went on to examine patterns and effects of contributory codings of Alzheimer's disease, dementia and senility for major underlying cause of death groupings (circulatory diseases, malignant cancers, respiratory diseases) and found large differences across these groups. Place of death of each of these major groups was also examined according to whether contributory codings of Alzheimer's disease, dementia or senility were present and radical differences observed between populations with and without contributory codings.</p>
<p>As the number of people with Alzheimer's disease, dementia and senility is projected to increase by over 70% in England between 2010 and 2030, these conditions are set to become increasingly important, both in terms of numbers of persons affected and resources consumed. Greater insight into the patterns and trends of these conditions is therefore essential to plan the provision of appropriate levels and patterns of care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verne, J., Harris, S., Ho, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.59</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.59</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Psychogeriatrics, Memory disorders (neurology), Drugs: CNS (not psychiatric), Memory disorders (psychiatry), Psychiatry of old age]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[New insights into place of death for people with Alzheimer's disease, dementia and senility]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>83</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/83-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A model for ethical CPR decision-making]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/83-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Half a century after the introduction of CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation), advance decisions to withhold CPR remain problematic. Previous research has identified inconsistent decision-making by doctors who largely receive no formal teaching in how to approach this decision &ndash; a decision about a treatment that has poor outcomes for many patient groups.</p>
<p>This presentation is based on research undertaken as part of a PhD study that investigated how decisions are currently made about CPR. In this qualitative research, a total of 33 senior doctors, junior doctors and nurses were interviewed about the CPR decision-making process, the issues arising, dealing with disagreement and the experience of performing CPR.</p>
<p>The interview transcripts were analysed thematically to identify ethically significant elements within the decision, to which normative ethical principles could be applied, in order to develop and describe an ethical approach to CPR decision-making.</p>
<p>This approach recognises the separate technical and ethical elements of the CPR decision. It also identifies the ethical significance of the CPR discussion and that it is in the process of the discussion that many of the difficulties inherent in the decision can be resolved to achieve consensus. Four clinical patient groups have been identified, each requiring a different purpose for the discussion. Identifying the aim of each discussion facilitates a more specific patient focussed discussion.</p>
<p>This research demonstrates that it is possible to achieve a consistent approach to ethical CPR decision-making. This is an approach that could be taught to doctors and nurses.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hayes, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.60</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.60</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Interventional cardiology, Research and publication ethics, Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A model for ethical CPR decision-making]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>83</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/83-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rethinking the ethical foundation of advance care planning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/83-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Research aims</st>
<p>This interpretive descriptive study was designed to explore the process of advance care planning (ACP).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design and methods</st>
<p>Patient-centred ACP was undertaken with persons diagnosed with advanced lung cancer and a significant other. Nine family dyads participated (18 participants; 15 conjoint interviews). Follow-up interviews occurred 3 and 6 months after the ACP conversation. The participants were asked about their experience of ACP and its impact on their thinking, conversations and relationships. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The accounts were analyzed using the constant comparison method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Most dyads completed the ACP process. Although the conversations were difficult, the dyads appreciated the opportunity to engage in these important and intimate discussions and evaluated the conversation positively. While the researcher structured the topics of the ACP discussion, the dyad led the interactional process. The process that unfolded during the ACP conversation was deeply relational and was characterized by mutuality, interdependence and shared decision making.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The ethical foundation of ACP has been rooted in individual autonomy and patient self-determination. However, the concept of individual autonomy is contested and there have been many theoretical critiques. Further, the importance of family involvement in all aspects of end-of-life care has been widely acknowledged. Yet, the orientation to individual autonomy remains, which invites clinical tension about the appropriate role of family in ACP related to the notion of avoiding &lsquo;undue influence&rsquo;. The findings of this study support the adoption of a re-visioned ethical stance encompassing a relational approach to autonomy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robinson, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.61</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.61</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Lung cancer (oncology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Lung cancer (respiratory medicine), End of life decisions (ethics), Research and publication ethics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rethinking the ethical foundation of advance care planning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/84-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patients', family members' and healthcare staffs' opinions about existential issues as a base for an educational intervention]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/84-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore patients', family members' and healthcare staff's opinions about existential issues important to patients with cancer and their relatives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Two integrative literature reviews were conducted about existential issues among cancer patients and relatives, and interventions to meet these issues. Four focus groups were conducted with healthcare staff working with cancer patients at different stages about patients' existential issues, and staff's responsibility when existential issues are raised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the patient review, existential issues were divided into two themes: struggle to maintain self-identity and threats to self-identity. Relatives' existential issues concerned living both in and beyond the presence of death, with reminders of death, compelling them to respond to life close to death and seek support. Few interventions directed to patients or relatives applicable to everyday healthcare practice were found. Focus groups with staff revealed four categories of patients' existential issues, life and death, meaning, freedom of choice, relationships and solitude. According to staff, their responsibility concerned achieving an encounter with the patient.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Results from three studies are congruent in that, patients, relatives and staff agree, although in different ways, about the importance of existential issues to patients and relatives. Healthcare staff was aware of the importance of existential issues and are to some extent confident about how to act when these issues are raised by the patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ongoing studies</st>
<p>The project group now continues implementing findings from these studies in an educational intervention to healthcare staff in different settings, and planning interventions to patients and relatives.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henoch, I., Danielson, E., Strang, S., Browall, M., Melin-Johansson, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.62</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.62</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patients', family members' and healthcare staffs' opinions about existential issues as a base for an educational intervention]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>84</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/84-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Singapore nursing students' perceptions about spirituality and spiritual care: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/84-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Spiritual care is a central element of holistic and multidisciplinary care, but is not often integrated into practice. Some nurses may confuse spirituality with religion and refer this aspect of care to other professionals. There is little exploration of student nurses' perceptions and attitudes towards spirituality and spiritual care. Identifying student nurses' perceptions may inform educational content and practice development activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>This exploratory study investigated nursing students' perceptions and attitudes about spirituality and spiritual care in practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>In-depth interviews were conducted with 16 final year pre-registration nursing students from three different educational institutions offering a degree or diploma programme in Singapore. Data were analysed using the Miles and Huberman (1994) research method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three themes emerged in regards to the construct of spirituality: (1) being human, (2) spiritual well-being and (3) spiritual awareness. The construct of spiritual care revealed three themes: (1) antecedents for spiritual care, (2) role of nurses in spiritual care, and (3) nurses' spirituality. Themes relating to the construct of factors influencing spiritual care were: (1) personal factors; (2) system factors and (3) patient factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Students perceived spirituality as an innate characteristic of individuals. Spiritual awareness was perceived to develop across the lifespan and was essential for spiritual well-being. Spiritual care required nurses to engage patients in meaningful ways. Cursory attention to spiritual care was considered ineffective and students perceived that a comprehensive spiritual assessment was important for care. Participants identified that nurses need to connect with patients in a unique spiritual care-giving relationship. Students also identified that nurses with certain attributes and spiritual awareness were more likely to provide spiritual care. However, students recognised that some nurses may not be equipped to address deeper levels of spiritual care. Education and professional development for effective spiritual care needs to be offered to nurses.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiew, L. H., Drury, V., Creedy, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.63</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.63</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Singapore nursing students' perceptions about spirituality and spiritual care: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Thursday 23 June 2011-Concurrent Session 4</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>84</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/85-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A common sense approach to improving advance care planning using the 'Plan-Do-Study-Act' cycle]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/85-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Advance care planning (ACP), in its most sophisticated form, is a comprehensive, ongoing, and holistic communication between a physician and his or her patient (or the patient's designated proxy) about their values, treatment preferences, and goals of care. However, treatment decisions at the end-of-life are very complex, making comprehensive ACP extremely challenging: everyone is reluctant to talk about death; clinicians find it easier to offer hope and another treatment or technology rather than comfort and support; and families find it hard to believe that treatment will not restore health. A number of ACP programs have learned how to successfully meet these challenges, many using the process of &lsquo;rapid-cycle&rsquo; Quality Improvement (QI) to achieve &lsquo;breakthrough&rsquo; change and improvements in practice. This presentation provides guidance and real-life examples for implementing ACP practices in local settings, summarizing over 10 years of successful ACP and related clinical QI work in the US with hundreds of health care professionals and social service providers across the gamut of service delivery silos. Key points covered in the presentation are ways to: target appropriate patients; embed ACP practices in busy healthcare settings; conduct rapid-cycle QI activities and test &lsquo;front-line&rsquo; ideas and successful practices in daily practice; and change the &lsquo;usual&rsquo; healthcare delivery setting culture by making QI and patient safety a top priority. Ensuring the centrality of the patient and family's voice in treatment decision-making is one of the most important goals for achieving patient/family-centred care. This presentation demonstrates how QI can help improve ACP.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilkinson, A., Lynn, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.64</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.64</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Medical error/ patient safety]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A common sense approach to improving advance care planning using the 'Plan-Do-Study-Act' cycle]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Workshop Session 1</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>85</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/85-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire Advance Care Planning Educational Model]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/85-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The model<sup>1</sup> responds to the challenges of implementing guidance on advance care planning using levels of education need, and the EoLC workforce levels. It is collaboration across Beds and Herts End of Life Network: 3 PCTs, 2 Cancer Networks, 8 independent hospices, 5 acute trusts, 3 community trusts. The coordinated approach is to ensure quality and standardisation. Guidance alone is not able to embed the advance care planning process in practice. The model<sup>1</sup> provides templates for facilitators to deliver the variety of education required for different audiences which include patients, carers and the public. The model<sup>1</sup> uses national documentation and resources for professionals and patients.</p>
<p>Steps in the model<sup>1</sup> are: identifying the workforce, identifying different levels of education, delivering education, measuring confidence levels, evaluation, and measurement of impact and consideration of sustainability.</p>
<p>The model<sup>1</sup> includes, raising public and professional awareness of what ACP is and who it should matter to, delivering the skills to instigate it and the skills for teaching ACP. A blended learning approach includes face to face learning, e-learning using the National e-learning modules and the East of England EoLC care home education project</p>
<p>The model<sup>1</sup> is part of implementation guidance, including: communication, information transfer, documentation, process and a competency based learning framework, so that learning is part of a wider learning experience in End of Life Care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell, S., Fowler, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.65</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.65</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire Advance Care Planning Educational Model]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Workshop Session 1</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>85</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/85-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Passion, persistence and pennies]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/85-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This interactive session will highlight the work of Fraser Healthy Authority (FHA) in British Columbia, Canada over the past 7 years to champion the development, implementation, and dissemination of its Advance Care Planning work for 1.5 million people throughout our system of care &ndash; 12 acute cares sites, 7500+ residential/long term care beds, and community programs. The FHA <I>Let's Talk</I> program, with a passionate commitment to system level change and education, has developed user-friendly, culturally sensitive and easily accessible tools and resources which have been adapted by health and community organizations across Canada, USA and New Zealand for use in their jurisdictions.</p>
<p>Our vision has led to a provincial Community of Practice with representatives from government, all BC regional health authorities, disease specific agencies, first responders, as well as the Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association (CHPCA) ACP Project Task Group to continuously share resources and experiences. We have also been able to influence policy and uptake at a provincial level with a recent decision to adapt the My Voice Workbook and to place FHA's <I>Let's Talk</I> DVD in all community libraries. Advocacy has resulted in new Advance Directive legislation which broadens options for documentation and choice at end of life.</p>
<p>In partnership with Calgary Health Region, Health Canada and the CHPCA, we have been an important leader to support a National Symposium, Consensus and framework documents, and other initiatives that have promoted a Canadian approach to ACP implementation and a national framework and research agenda.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barwich, D., Hoffmann, C., Tayler, C., Roberts, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.66</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.66</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Adult intensive care, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Passion, persistence and pennies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Workshop Session 1</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>85</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Speak Up - A National Advance Care Planning Campaign in Canada]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association has established a Canadian National Advance Care Planning (ACP) Day/Campaign &ndash; Speak Up: Start the Conversation about End-of-Life Care. This campaign, which includes a national day to recognize ACP, provides an annual opportunity for individuals to discuss their wishes with family, friends and health care professionals while raising overall awareness of the importance of ACP throughout the year. The ACP day/campaign engages professionals and the public alike through partnerships, organizational events and media events. The premier day was launched on 12 April, 2011.</p>
<p>The campaign has been launched in partnership with 16 partners, including professional associations (medicine, nursing and law); research organizations and academics; regional health authorities; health-focused non-governmental organizations; and communications experts. It was based on 2 years of work including the development of ACP in Canada: A National Framework through broad consultation with over 100 stakeholders across the country.</p>
<p>This workshop will highlight the accomplishments of Speak Up. It will demonstrate the ways that organizations and individuals across a country are able to promote ACP in their communities. The workshop will demonstrate and describe the various resources and tools used in the campaign, and discuss the communications strategies for promoting ACP awareness. Workshop presenters will showcase toolkits for professionals and the public, a dynamic website; and poster and other promotional templates, as well as communication strategies and background resources. Participants will explore how they, their organizations and their communities could develop and become engaged in similar campaigns.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baxter, S., Chow, K., Hanvey, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.67</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.67</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Speak Up - A National Advance Care Planning Campaign in Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011 - Workshop Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>86</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A gift to your family]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This workshop will describe an initiative within a Canadian health authority (Vancouver Coastal Health, referred to as VCH), in which the Community Engagement Team and the Advance Care Planning (ACP) project leadership partnered to seek this public engagement. To better understand the public's perspectives, and to facilitate greater public acceptance of ACP in our health region, a public forum was held in March 2010. The workshop will outline the forum participants, the program including discussion topics and the outcomes. Themes discussed at the forum included key aspects of public messaging, countering public fear by &lsquo;normalising&rsquo; ACP conversations, and supporting patients and families to have these conversations. It was acknowledged that some members of the public might be mistrustful or worried about the intent and outcomes of ACP and thus the need to emphasize the benefits of ACP, &lsquo;a gift to your family&rsquo;. The forum influenced the emphasis of the ACP project on the importance of communication, the language used for public information, and the ways in which the public are involved in education. At the forum, a number of public participants expressed interest in assisting with public education; subsequently, a group of volunteers has been trained and will present ACP workshops to public groups in our region. The experience of these volunteers will continue to inform our VCH approach to ACP.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGregor, D., Porterfield, P., Tolson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.68</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.68</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A gift to your family]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011 - Workshop Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>86</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Novel Teaching of Advance Care Planning Conversations for Family Doctors]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corke, C., Milnes, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.69</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.69</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Novel Teaching of Advance Care Planning Conversations for Family Doctors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011 - Workshop Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>86</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Let's talk about it: conversations in advance care planning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This workshop is based on Chapter 23 in Thomas and Lobo (2010)<sup>1</sup> where communication skills are seen as integral to delivering advance care planning (ACP). It reflects the need to teach the principles of ACP alongside communication skills. It recognises that to teach these in isolation may lead to a lack of confidence in the professional engaging patients in discussions around end of life care issues. This workshop draws on models of communication that can lend structure, such as SPIKES, PREPARED, SAGE &amp; THYME and the Calgary-Cambridge model of the consultation. To demonstrate how theory moves into practice, relevant scenarios have been identified to illustrate how they may be used. The theory outlined in Chapter 23 has been taken into the workplace to inform the model of education used in delivering ACP.</p>
<p>This work is innovative in understanding the relationship between communication skills and effective ACP and has been put into practice in education development.</p>
<p>The workshop will consider the key points of an ACP process. Role played scenarios will be used to engage participants in an interactive process that allows specific communication skills to be demonstrated and reflected upon in the context of ACP.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beavan, J., Fowler, C., Russell, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.70</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.70</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Let's talk about it: conversations in advance care planning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011 - Workshop Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>86</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-e?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Novel Teaching of Advance Care Planning Conversations for Family Doctors]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/86-e?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Though most doctors recognize the value of Advance Care Planning (ACP) only a minority of doctors feel comfortable raising the topic with patients. This results in many patients being denied the opportunity to plan.</p>
<p>The literature suggests approaches that are effective and some doctors represent excellent role models. We have reviewed published approaches and have recorded the conversations of doctors who appear to have highly effective strategies for the communication of the ACP message (and others who feel that their discussions are ineffective and uncomfortable).</p>
<p>Using this information we have designed and implemented a teaching program that clearly teaches an approach that is acceptable to patients and which encourages patients to engage in ACP.</p>
<p>Family Doctors require teaching that is easily accessible and flexible so this program includes multimodal educational components including DVD examples of good and bad approaches (with critical commentary) and an eSim component where doctors are able to conduct an on-line simulated dialogue with a simulated patient. In the case of the eSim there is ability to record and to score performance.</p>
<p>This project demonstrates a novel education system to explain effective language to those family doctors who recognize the benefit of ACP but lack the skills to introduce the topic without upsetting their patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corke, C., Milnes, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.71</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.71</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Novel Teaching of Advance Care Planning Conversations for Family Doctors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011 - Workshop Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>86</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>87</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/87-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient-Centered Worksheets for Advance Care Planning: Education for Patients and Guidance for Clinician Communication]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/87-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In the 1990s the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) developed worksheets to help patients think about and discuss aspects of advance care planning (ACP). The content of the worksheets was based on input from patients, family members, physicians, and religious leaders. Research demonstrated that the worksheets improved clinician understanding of patient values and preferences. The worksheets were updated in 2008&ndash;2009 with input from experts, including clinicians, religious leaders, ethicists, and attorneys. This was followed by an iterative content review involving subject matter experts and senior VHA leaders, and editing by experts in patient education and communication.</p>
<p>The worksheets elicit a patient's values and/or preferences, such as hopes and fears (eg, &lsquo;If I have a condition that will make me die very soon, even with life-sustaining treatments ..., what would be your biggest fears ... ? What would you most want to avoid?&rsquo;), strongly held beliefs (eg, &lsquo;I gain strength from other things like family, prayer, inspirational literature, or music. I want the following things included [in] my care: ... &lsquo;), contacts for taking care of important things, mental health care, conditions in which life-sustaining treatment would be wanted (versus not wanted), and care during one's last days.</p>
<p>Workshop participants will assign priorities to aspects of ACP they wish to discuss, discuss their approaches to a priority aspect of ACP, complete a worksheet on the same subject, and then discuss the strengths and weakness of the worksheet for their practice. This will be repeated for several worksheets to demonstrate their applications and value in ACP.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pearlman, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.72</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.72</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient-Centered Worksheets for Advance Care Planning: Education for Patients and Guidance for Clinician Communication]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011 - Workshop Session 2</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>87</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/87-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ethical and Moral Dilemmas in End-of-Life Decision Making: Is Advanced Care Planning the answer?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/87-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Advanced Care Planning (ACP) in end-of-life decision making is a fairly new concept in Australia. The greater use of ACP may assist the community in recognising the limits of modern medicine and technology and acknowledge palliative care as a life enhancement philosophy of care. As health care professionals gain knowledge and skills in ACP they are confronted with issues and difficulties which may impact on moral and ethical values.</p>
<p>Disagreements and dilemmas have arisen regarding the interpretation and application of Advanced Care Directives (ACD). The intentions of the substitute decision makers, at the time when the patient has lost capacity can also be complicated. Problem solving, strategies implemented and the resolving of disputes are investigated and analysed.</p>
<p>Discourse Analysis of conversations and interviews with the major stakeholders (patients, families, doctors and nurses) within the case studies reveal power relations within social interaction and social structure. This influences end of life decision making. The case studies were set in residential aged care facilities, where ACP is now routinely offered (but not necessarily accepted).</p>
<p>ACP promotes autonomy and ensures that the person's values and preferences are respected and known for a future time, when capacity may be reduced. For various reasons, ACP has been slow in progress, as Australians have been hesitant in embracing this concept. By analysing these case studies, some of the dilemmas and barriers to ACP are identified through the views of the family, friends, carers, health care professionals and the person themselves.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sneesby, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.73</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.73</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Research and publication ethics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ethical and Moral Dilemmas in End-of-Life Decision Making: Is Advanced Care Planning the answer?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>87</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/87-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The three I's of advance care planning education: innovation, interdisciplinary and interactive]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/87-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Fraser Healthy Authority (FHA) in British Columbia, Canada has been a champion and leader of Advance Care Planning (ACP) provincially and nationally.</p>
<p>Standardized education has been an integral part of the success of this program. Two 30 min on-line modules are augmented by 6 h classroom sessions. The on-line modules are interactive and focus on the importance of communication throughout the continuum of care. Classroom sessions provide an opportunity to discuss both personal and professional experiences, enhance ACP communication skills through practice exercises and further understanding of the legal underpinning as well as the role and responsibilities of professionals and substitute decision makers. Classroom sessions are purposely interdisciplinary and typically include professionals such as respiratory therapist, spiritual care practitioners, social workers, nurses, managers, care coordinators, etc who work in various program areas such as outpatient clinics, acute, residential and primary care. This assists to illustrate the number of professionals and perspectives patients and families encounter throughout their journey of care and the need for consistent and standardized ACP approach.</p>
<p>Though surveys and on-going feedback, students have stated FHAs education has provided a unique opportunity to learn from colleagues, enhance communication and decisional conflict skills. Students further note that following this education they were able to incorporate ACP with individuals not deemed at the &lsquo;end of life.&rsquo; For example, students experienced an 11% increase in conversations with those individuals with chronic illnesses and a 21% increase with healthy adults. To date, 1500 healthcare professionals have completed education.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoffmann, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.74</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.74</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The three I's of advance care planning education: innovation, interdisciplinary and interactive]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>88</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/88-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors associated with community-based case managers' advance care planning practices]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/88-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Community-based geriatric case managers work with an increasingly frail older population in need of advance care planning (ACP) throughout the end of life; however little is known regarding factors that influence their professional practices in this area. This study presents the findings from a mixed methods study which utilized focus groups and surveys to examine case managers' ACP practices in the state of Florida in the United States. Qualitative findings suggest that case managers hold ambiguous views regarding ACP, perceive divergent roles in this area, and engage in a range of primarily informational ACP practices. Themes from the study suggest that case managers view five key influences that either assist or impede practices including: (1) paradox of case management and programmatic realities; (2) extent of family presence and involvement; (3) level of proficiency in ACP; (4) degree of client receptivity to planning; and (5) limited communication with providers. Regression analyses of the state-wide surveys suggest the following correlates of practice: years of experience, the amount of ACP training experiences, perceived skill in geriatric practice competencies, perceived barriers to practice, and experience in ACP of a personal nature. The research reveals that community-based practitioners engage in a broader approach to ACP which extends beyond domains of health and end-of-life care by addressing social, legal, financial and residential planning as well. In addition, the study's findings empirically support a conceptual model of factors associated with professional practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Black, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.75</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.75</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors associated with community-based case managers' advance care planning practices]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>88</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>88</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/88-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advanced care planning for people with motor neurone disease]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/88-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The proposed study is anticipated to commence in January 2011 with interviews of carers and people with MND, sourced initially through the member registry of the MND Association of Western Australia (MNDAWA). The purpose of these open-ended interviews is to assess their understanding of new Western Australian (WA) legislation relating to Advanced Health Directives (AHD) and Enduring Power of Guardianship (EPG) and individual needs of people with MND in relation to end-of-life care issues.</p>
<p>Thematic analysis of the interviews is anticipated to articulate key areas for support for people with MND, particularly how to target education packages specific to their needs.</p>
<p>To date, much of the research relating to MND relates to finding a cause or cure. Little research has been undertaken to establish the needs of people diagnosed with MND and no research has been undertaken in WA in relation to the new AHD/EPG legislation. The significance of this proposed research is to provide a baseline of understanding in the specific target community of their knowledge about this legislation and how it may be utilised to support their health care management when they are unable to articulate their desires as their disease progresses.</p>
<p>The findings from this research will be transferable to other neurological conditions, as well as other progressive degenerative diseases. It may be useful in community care situations as well as hospice and tertiary hospitals in the event of admission.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.76</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.76</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advanced care planning for people with motor neurone disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>88</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>88</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/88-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance care planning in general practice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/88-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Barwon Health's (BH) Respecting Patient Choices (RPC) program together with the local General Practitioner's (GP) Association and two GP developed a project plan to implement a model of advance care planning (ACP) into General Practice over a 6-month period.</p>
<p>The aims of the project were to increase the awareness and uptake of ACP by GP patients. Also, to demonstrate an increased participation in ACP whereby there is an established rapport and confidence with the doctor and provide a sustainable ACP model for general practice.</p>
<p>State and federal governments supports the accessibility of ACP for all Australians, yet there is no specific funding item number to support ACP in a cost effective manner in general practice. However, the provision of appropriate care for patients and the ripple effect for future savings in the acute sector has the potential to demonstrate overall benefits.</p>
<p>Patients tend to expect their GP's, with whom they trust and have an established rapport, to initiate ACP or end of life discussions. Project outcomes reflect this notion and demonstrate that, by utilising staff from a funded RPC&reg; program, a cost effective ACP model for General Practice is viable, with patients having a high rate of acceptance, participation and satisfaction.</p>
<p>It is a recommendation that specialty services provided by ACP staff (RPC program), who would otherwise facilitate ACP for those referred into the service from GPs, should be expanded and resourced to provide outreach ACP Facilitators to General Practice in order for the continuation of a highly effective, viable model.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mann, J., Neale, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.77</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.77</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance care planning in general practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>88</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>88</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/89-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The evolution of Austin health's 'Statement of Choices']]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/89-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The Respecting Patient Choices team has been doing advance care planning since 2002. We encourage people to nominate a substitute decision maker (SDM) and document their health care wishes on a &lsquo;Statement of Choices&rsquo; (SOC). This document has evolved and now includes four components to ensure that the written plans are understood and appropriately acted upon by doctors.</p>
<p>They are:</p>
<p><l type="ord"><li><p>to record a person's wishes about future medical treatment based on their goals, values and beliefs.</p>
</li><li>
<p>to record this information in a language that doctors would recognise and could act upon.</p>
</li><li>
<p>be easy to fill in.</p>
</li><li>
<p>to provide prompts for people facilitating the ACP conversation.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To evaluate the evolution of the SOC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective audit of SOC completed in 2010.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Most people (70%) choose to nominate a SDM and complete a SOC. People generally nominate a family member as their SDM and the majority (&gt;90%) indicate on their SOC that they &lsquo;would not want CPR even if the doctors think it could be beneficial&rsquo; and &lsquo;do not want life prolonging treatment (LPT) at all&rsquo;. 25% provided guidance on what would be an &lsquo;acceptable outcome&rsquo;. The SOC is recognised by the doctors and is acted upon.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Austin Health has devised a SOC form that enables people to record their medical treatment preferences especially in relation to CPR and LPT.</p>
</li><li>
<p> The SOC is being further evolved for specific chronic conditions (eg, dialysis).</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson, L., Detering, K., Silvester, W., Hancock, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.78</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.78</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The evolution of Austin health's 'Statement of Choices']]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>89</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/89-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The role of the community volunteer in advance care planning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/89-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This presentation reports findings about the volunteer's role in an intervention developed through research to establish an accessible and sustainable model of advance care planning (ACP) for older people in rural communities in south eastern Australia. Entrust-U is innovative for initiating ACP through engaging volunteers in a number of roles, including: focussed interviews which move from an evaluative life review to identify values, a trusted decision-maker, and future wishes for care; preparing a life story from these interviews; facilitating conversations with a trusted decision-maker; and preparing a letter to a participant's General Practitioner.</p>
<p>Existing palliative care volunteers are given additional training for Entrust-U. Using a facilitated action research design, volunteers engaged in piloting the evolving model participated in briefing, training and debriefing, and a focus group. Informed by the principles of interpretative description, thematic analysis of notes and transcripts of these meetings and evaluation interviews identified three emergent orientations taken by volunteers in their role. This emergent new knowledge indicates each orientation brings a different approach to the project, with these differences exemplified in interviewing styles during the evaluative life review and exploration of ACP. A volunteering orientation focussed on inter-personal relations concentrated on building rapport. An orientation focussed on process, approached the interview as a procedure to be followed. An orientation focussed on the task of ACP adopted an instrumental and linear interview approach. Recognition of these volunteer orientations has significant implications for training and coordination of volunteers.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Threlkeld, G., Bidstrup, B., Downing, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.79</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.79</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The role of the community volunteer in advance care planning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>89</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/89-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sharing stories: a place for aboriginal elders to tell their story, so their journey continues ...]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/89-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Aboriginal organisations throughout Victoria are funded to deliver quality services to Aboriginal people through HACC, Aged Care, and Disability programs. Services are delivered in a culturally appropriate way taking into consideration the Aboriginal way of life and taking a holistic approach which may include the whole family. These services may be in the homes or in residential care facilities.</p>
<p>Service Co-ordination was targeted recently with linkages and relationships being made between Aboriginal services and mainstream services to find best practices on how to deliver services to Aboriginal people. A 5 stage consultation process occurred and many communities had great results in achieving their goals and outcomes.</p>
<p>A booklet was developed by the Elders, HACC &amp; Disability Services at GEGAC as an information sharing tool for use within the Aboriginal Community for those with Dementia, their families, and the staff involved in their care. In consultation with the local Aboriginal community, the book provides a method of recording a person's life as well as giving them the opportunity to tell their story. It also provides conversation points for aspects that they remember well.</p>
<p>Elders who have shared their story have taken great delight in sharing their childhood experiences, life journey, trials and tribulations with staff. All staff have a better insight into the clients life and challenges that they have had to overcome. This booklet has had an extremely positive result from the local community and health related services.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hawke, J., Morris, L., Wighton, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.80</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.80</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Memory disorders (neurology), Memory disorders (psychiatry)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sharing stories: a place for aboriginal elders to tell their story, so their journey continues ...]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>89</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/89-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Life before death: Living Well, Leaving well]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/89-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The &lsquo;Life Before Death&rsquo; initiative is conceived and spearheaded by a Singapore philanthropic foundation to advocate and create greater awareness of the need to improve care for the dying.</p>
<p>First conceived as a local campaign in Singapore in 2006, &lsquo;Life Before Death&rsquo; has evolved as an ongoing social experiment that harnesses unconventional online and offline initiatives to break the taboo of death and to foster &lsquo;die-logues&rsquo; or conversations on end-of-life matters.</p>
<p>The Singapore initiative reached out to the terminally ill and their caregivers using print advertisements, radio talk shows, newspaper editorial features, TV documentaries, and a caregiver's diary. A national street poll on death attitudes was conducted to spur &lsquo;die-logues&rsquo; on end-of-life issues.</p>
<p>Today, the initiative works with diverse partners to reach a wider global audience through social media, films, photography, cartoons and art, enthusing the public to view life and death differently. A recent project, &lsquo;Happy Coffins&rsquo;, allowed people to personalize coffins for themselves or a loved one, and by so doing, overcome the stigma of death.</p>
<p>The Foundation commissioned the first-ever global Quality of Death index that ranked 40 countries on their provision of end-of-life care. In the pipeline is an international feature documentary that examines the global crisis of untreated pain and end-of-life care. Shot in 10 countries, the film has attracted diverse participation from 40 nationalities.</p>
<p>This initiative demonstrates how a ground-up non-profit effort can create conversations and greater awareness of end-of-life care, as well as spur advocacy for better care for the dying.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, P. W., Foundation, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.81</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.81</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pain (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Life before death: Living Well, Leaving well]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>90</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/90-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A self-evaluation tool for advance care planning programs]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/90-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Internationally a number of advance care planning (ACP) programs have been established. Measurement of a program's success is usually focused on the completion rate of advance directives or plans. As a quality measure though it provides little information about the organisational processes that either contribute to or hinder a program's success. A study was conducted to develop an evaluation tool for an ACP model (ACP) implemented in community palliative care services. A multi-site action research approach was used to work with three community palliative care services located in Victoria, Australia. Qualitative and quantitative data collection strategies were used to develop the ACP evaluation tool. The tool was used as both a peer-assessment and self-assessment tool. It identifies a 3-staged organisational implementation process for the ACP model. These were: establishment, consolidation and sustainability. This occurred across the previously established ACP model domains of governance, ACP documentation processes, ACP practice, ACP education, quality processes and community engagement. The evaluation tool enabled community palliative care services to monitor, evaluate and plan quality improvement of their ACP model and thereby improve end of life care. As the tool describes generic processes common to all health services there is potential transferability of the tool to other types of health services.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackford, J., Street, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.82</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.82</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A self-evaluation tool for advance care planning programs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>90</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>90</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/90-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hear the right story and finish up in country: learning lessons from Aboriginal Australians implementing Advance Care Planning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/90-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>As part of a national study evaluating a model of advance care planning (ACP) in community palliative care we conducted interviews and focus groups with health and social care workers providing chronic illness and palliative care services in Aboriginal communities. Many of these communities are in remote areas with limited access to health care facilities. Patients and support people have to leave their country (community land) and travel long distances to receive treatment for cancer, chronic kidney disease or other illnesses.</p>
<p>Data analysis indicated the need for conversations and planning for both clinical and the social care. Three major themes arose from the data.</p>
<p>The right story: including the use of language, correct information, avoiding unwanted treatment, and knowing the patient's wishes.</p>
<p>Right people: identifying the decision makers, who should be involved in conversations and who should be told, wider dissemination of the story. Finishing up: importance of spiritual well being, ceremony and ritual, familial ties to country, and people present.</p>
<p>Implementing ACP enabled a cultural group that is often underserved, to be able to make choices about their treatment options and to finish up &ndash; to die in country. We conclude that while Aboriginal practices are specific to their culture, many of the subthemes are relevant to patients and families across cultures. Understanding the deeper social issues that underlie ACP conversations and decision making will enhance health and social care workers ability to implement ACP enabling patients and their families to experience appropriate care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray, R., Street, A., Blackford, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.83</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.83</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Urology, Health policy, Hospice, Urological surgery, Health service research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hear the right story and finish up in country: learning lessons from Aboriginal Australians implementing Advance Care Planning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>90</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>90</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/90-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Making health choices; Part 1. Advance Care planning in aged care project. Setting the scene]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/90-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The (2009) Australian National Health &amp; Hospital Reform Commission Report highlighted the need for advance care planning (ACP) for older persons in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Using knowledge gained from a previous RACF Project Implementation in 2004-5, Respecting Patient Choices has developed a sustainability based model for the effective training of residential aged care service staff to deliver ACP to their residents. This presentation will provide a unique insight into the complexities of ACP implementation within Australian residential aged care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Project methods</st>
<p>19 individual RACFs, representing 12 Aged Care organisations were selected from regional and metropolitan areas of Victoria. Three full-day workshops were delivered over a 6 month period, with RACFs expected to complete sustainability oriented tasks in between each workshop in order to meet the project deliverables. As part of the project an aged care specific ACP document was developed by an expert working party.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Pre-implementation over-view</st>
<p>A number of contextual factors have impacted the present project including; Australian geography, RACF funding issues, and provision of medical support to RACF residents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>from a pre-implementation policy and practice survey demonstrated a wide variation of the quality of existing ACP knowledge and practices. An audit of pre-existing ACP documents revealed that all documents were missing key elements of a best practice ACP document. 11 of the 12 organisations in the project have adopted the specially developed document.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson, L., Sjanta, R., Fullam, R., Silvester, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.84</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.84</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Making health choices; Part 1. Advance Care planning in aged care project. Setting the scene]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>90</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>90</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/91-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The use of audience response system to promote advance care planning in community and veterans care home]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/91-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The concept of advance care planning (ACP) is new for residents in community and those living in Veterans Care Home (VCH). To increase their interest and understanding of ACP, an interactive audience response system (ARS) was introduced to facilitate the discussion of ACP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and results</st>
<p>Most participants can live independently. They watch TV every day and can easily handle the remote control device. The device of ARS is similar to the remote control and can be easily managed by community elderly. A video clip about ACP was presented and followed by multiple choice questions about the concept of ACP. ACP introductory sessions were delivered in the community and VCH. A total of 2596 habitants participated in the program from September to November 2010. 704 used ARS to finished the session. The satisfaction was higher for those using ARS in the session (69~92%) than those using the traditional deductive method (38~69%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>ARS is an effective method to promote the discussion of ACP in the community and care home. There are high interactions between the speaker and residents. It can be used effectively even with the elderly people.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, Y., Hsieh, J. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.85</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.85</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The use of audience response system to promote advance care planning in community and veterans care home]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>91</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/91-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preliminary results of a formal advance care planning program in voluntary welfare nursing homes in Singapore]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/91-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In Singapore, most voluntary nursing homes(VNHs) residents with next-of-kins(NOKs) do not receive advance care planning(ACP). A local hospital embarked on a pilot program, Project CARE (PC), to conduct formal ACP and enable enhanced palliative care delivery in selected VNHs.</p>
<p>This pilot cohort study of six VNHs residents included those with advanced medical conditions(UK Gold Standards Framework criteria) with Modified Shah Barthel Index score &lt;30. Excluded are residents &lt;65 years old (unless satisfied inclusion criteria), without NOKs and decision making capacity(DMC), or on police evaluation. ACP were initiated with documentation of preferences on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), medical intervention(comfort, limited intervention, full treatment) and place of death. Residents would be enrolled into PC when preferences were for comfort care/limited intervention in nursing home without or with further treatment at hospital. Hospital team would co-manage with VNHs during residents' deterioration. Outcomes are evaluated from program inception on September 2009 till January 2011.</p>
<p>Of a total of 1464 residents, female(55.1%), Chinese(88.8%) and age &ge;75 years old(61.7%) predominated. 54.4% of residents fulfilled criteria for possible ACP. Of this latter group, 51.2% completed ACP with 46.3% enrolled into PC. 4 NHs with minimum 6 months of patient reviews in PC framework were further evaluated with 153 deaths recorded. Success in honouring preferences on medical intervention and death place while in PC were 89.4% and 66% respectively. Mortality rate among eligible residents but without ACP yet, had ACP and in PC/not in PC were 24.6%, 25.8% and 24.2% respectively.</p>
<p>Care preferences could be honoured under PC framework.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siew, C. W., Onn, Y., Koh, M., Gan, C. M., Zainal, R., Ng, T. W., Ismail, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.86</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.86</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Interventional cardiology, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preliminary results of a formal advance care planning program in voluntary welfare nursing homes in Singapore]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>91</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/91-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A study to explore the experience of advanced care planning among family caregivers and relatives of people with advanced dementia]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/91-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The North West NHS End of Life Care Initiative aims to improve the quality of care received by older people with dementia in care settings at the end of their lives. The implementation of advance care planning (ACP) by use of Gold Standards Framework was studied in one care home specialising in the care of people with advanced dementia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of the experiences of family caregivers as proxy decision makers for a relative with advanced dementia at the end of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data were recorded using semi structured interviews from a self selecting convenience sample of 12 family relatives of residents with advanced dementia in a long term care setting. All respondents had been involved in proxy decision making relating to the care and treatment of their relative with advanced dementia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Study participants describe ACP as a distressing but necessary activity. Knowledge of the person and the family dynamics was identified as an important factor before staff approach relatives about ACP. Study participants were able to give a good explanation of what was discussed during the completion of the ACP. This included management of pain, medical interventions and treatments and also nutrition and hydration needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>ACP is a relevant and useful activity to undertake with family carers. However the ethical burden &lsquo;to do the right thing&rsquo; can contribute to the already distressed family carer and should therefore be supported by experienced and educated health professionals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashton, S., Roe, B., Jack, B., McClelland, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.87</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.87</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), Pain (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Memory disorders (psychiatry), End of life decisions (ethics), Quality improvement]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A study to explore the experience of advanced care planning among family caregivers and relatives of people with advanced dementia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011-Concurrent Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>91</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/91-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance care planning - out goes paternalism, in comes consultative conversation]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/91-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We all know what we want &ndash; or do we? Patients cannot &lsquo;choose&rsquo; to not be ill or avoid dying of their disease, but deserve be involved in decisions about their care.</p>
<p>UK Mental Capacity legislation heralded a long-overdue change, encapsulated in the NHS slogan &lsquo;no decision about me without me&rsquo;; everyone must to do everything to maximise patients' decision-making ability. Impediment of brain function cannot be assumed to render decisions invalid; if decision-making capacity for a particular decision is lacking, then previously expressed wishes must be considered when making a decision in a <I>person's best-interest</I>.</p>
<p>Personhood is a function of being alive; after death one is a corpse. So, best interest to relieve suffering may necessitate risk-taking, but does not include deliberately killing the person.</p>
<p>Advance Decisions to refuse treatment (aka Advance Directives/Living Wills) if competently drawn up and relevant to the specific situation are legally binding, signalling the person has <I>already</I> withheld consent to a particular intervention; they cannot direct in advance that something is done, neither drug treatment nor surgery nor lethal overdose.</p>
<p>In ethical equipoise is an advance statement of wishes &ndash; to be considered if lack of capacity requires a best-interest decision.</p>
<p>Advance care planning (ACP) maintains this equipoise; calm timely discussions can &lsquo;plan for the worst and hope for the best&rsquo;. Open, realistic conversations address concerns, avoid false reassurance, and honestly discuss options.</p>
<p>Honest ACP can reveal service deficits that militate against excellent care, galvanising action to improvements in care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finlay, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.88</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.88</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Poisoning, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance care planning - out goes paternalism, in comes consultative conversation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Friday 24 June 2011 - Plenary Session 5</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>92</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/92-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Managing the quality of sleep among elderly patients using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/92-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sleep is a necessary part of life. Assessment of sleep patterns enables the nurse to intervene immediately by implementing interventions with the client, or by referring the client for further assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is an effective instrument created by Buysse et al in 1989. It differentiates &lsquo;poor&rsquo; from &lsquo;good&rsquo; sleep by measuring seven areas: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency and sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication and daytime dysfunction over the last month. The client self relates each of these seven areas of sleep. Scoring of the answers is based on a 0 to 3 scale, three reflects the negative extreme on the Likert scale. A sum of &lsquo;5&rsquo;or greater indicates a &lsquo;poor&rsquo; sleeper.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>Seven patients who had sleeping problems were assessed. Data using the PSQI was collected from the 18th of June till the 18th of July 2010. Out of these seven patients, four of them were found to a sum of 5 to 6 as their global PSQI score. Two of them were given sleep medication to improve their sleeping patterns and the other two of them were referred to a psychologist. Three of the patients were found to have subjective sleep problems; two of them were overweight and were asked to start an exercise program. The other patient was found to lead a sedentary lifestyle and was encouraged to be more active.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The PSQI can be used for both initial assessment and ongoing comparative measurements with older adults across all health settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheah, E., Rajaram, S., Cheah, E., Sidek, N., Tan, M. H., Fadillah, F., Zheng, D., Hamid, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.89</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.89</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Managing the quality of sleep among elderly patients using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Primary Care Community Including Out of Hours</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>92</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>92</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/92-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Collaborative patient care model: comprehensive care coordination for geriatric population]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/92-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Evolutionary changes in the health care delivery system and reimbursement of health care services in current healthcare scenario has dramatically changed the resource assessment and health care utilization. Not only that, it has also placed a greater emphasis on quality of services provided through different post acute care settings. Kissito Healthcare has designed and implemented a unique collaborative model named as Collaborative Patient Care (CPC) Model. Compared to standard care, CPC Model aims to address the organization's mission to deliver quality patient-centred care and demonstrate greater continuity of care, a shorter duration of stay and improved patient outcomes.</p>
<p>The CPC Model is based on four tenets: process, quality, cost and outcome with the patient considered as the centre for the tenets. Evidence-based best practices and medicine are embedded in the care processes. Care is coordinated and integrated across all elements and in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner. The intended outcomes of the CPC Model include reduction in preventable rehospitalization, reduction in mortality and readmission rates, continuity of care across all post acute settings, patient driven shorter rehabilitation and recuperation periods as opposed to Payment Setting.</p>
<p>The model is theory-based, collaborative and multidisciplinary primarily focusing on patient-centred care. But evidence of the CPC Model's effectiveness remains inconclusive although there are positive outcomes based on intermediary results. Empiric evidence is needed to validate the effectiveness of the model. If proven effective, model can be widely implemented and translated to a national standard based on evidences.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohanty, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.90</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.90</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Epidemiologic studies, Adult intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Collaborative patient care model: comprehensive care coordination for geriatric population]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Primary Care Community Including Out of Hours</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>92</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>92</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/92-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing a culture of medication safety in the rural palliative care home setting New South Wales (NSW) Australia]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/92-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Improving Medication Safety for Clients and their Carers in the Rural Palliative Care Home Setting Project commenced January 2008 in response to an error involving a carer administered medication. Clinicians identified that no formalised process existed within NSW for carer medication administration despite a widespread practice of carers administering subcutaneous medications at home, especially in the last few days of life. It was recognised that formalised protocols and standardised training for carers were required to ensure patient safety.</p>
<p>The need to respect patient and carer choices is emphasised throughout care while providing effective symptom control in the palliative care home setting. The project consisted of evaluating a carer's preparedness to administer subcutaneous medications and provided education and structured support to the carer to administer these medications. A culture of medication safety emerged that was welcomed and embraced by patients, carers and families and the clinicians. The project developed a legal and ethical framework on which to base these standardised practices.</p>
<p>This project was an initiative of a health promoting palliative care service as per Allan Kellehear's 1999 model with service delivery strategies based on the five major &lsquo;action&rsquo; principles of the Ottawa Charter. The outcomes demonstrated that carers were trained to safely administer subcutaneous medication and there were no medication errors.</p>
<p>Additional outcomes included improvements in After-Hours Occupational Health and Safety for staff, and improved the end of life decision-making abilities and processes for patients, carers and families enabling choice in place of care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Short, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.91</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.91</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Unwanted effects / adverse reactions, End of life decisions (ethics), Medical error/ patient safety, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing a culture of medication safety in the rural palliative care home setting New South Wales (NSW) Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Primary Care Community Including Out of Hours</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>92</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>92</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/93-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Launching ADVANCE care planning as a collabrative approach]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/93-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A multi-organisational/professional project group formed to implement advance care planning, to include the Preferred Priorities of Care document. An early outcome indicated the need to develop a communication pathway and engage with the out of hours providers.</p>
<p>Consequently the group developed the use of The Lions &lsquo;Message in a Bottle&rsquo; (MIB), a plastic bottle placed in a patients fridge to hold key information about an individual's ACP and contact numbers of health professionals involved with the patient.</p>
<p>The purpose of the MIB was to ensure patients wishes and preferences were known, and to assist the Out of Hours GPs and Ambulance service in difficult decision making.</p>
<p>The project identified other areas to address to ensure the implementation of advance care planning was robust;<l type="tab"><li><p> EoLC Education to Emergency Care Practitioners, (ambulance professionals with a remit to prevent admission).</p>
</li><li>
<p> Advance care planning workshops for all health and social care professionals.</p>
</li><li>
<p> A succinct transfer of information form</p>
</li><li>
<p> Collaborative End of Life Care registers between in hours and out of hours.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The project is being launched to an audience of 80 encompassing commissioners, GPs, user representation, Acute and Community staff, care home staff, Learning Disability and Mental Health nurses, Hospital Consultants, Adult Care Services, Hospice staff and many others.</p>
<p>The impact of the launch will be measured using a confidence questionnaire.</p>
<p>The longer term outcomes for commissioners will include;<l type="tab"><li><p> Increased home deaths</p>
</li><li>
<p> Fewer hospital admissions.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>These will be monitored using vital signs data.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fowler, C., Bettany, A., White, J., Finch, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.92</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.92</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Interventional cardiology, Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics), End of life decisions (palliative care), Child and adolescent psychiatry, Disability, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Launching ADVANCE care planning as a collabrative approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Primary Care Community Including Out of Hours</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>93</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>93</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/93-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The end-of-life care for patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/93-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Palliative care historically focuses on cancer patients. It is important to gain more insight into the end-of-life (EoL) care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the EoL care needs of patients with advanced COPD. A computerized literature search was performed to identify relevant studies. Papers were obtained from searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL and PubMed databases (timespan: 2001 to November 2010). Studies were included that reported original data on EoL care in patients with advanced COPD. A total of 58 articles were identified in the different databases. 18 studies met the inclusion criteria.</p>
<p>The findings reveal that advanced COPD patients have significantly poorer physical, psycho-spiritual and social functioning. They suffered from multiple complicated symptoms that are usually poorly controlled. They also experienced a high degree of emotional-spiritual distress and social isolation, but these usually managed to inadequately and may even be ignored. They had high levels of information need of the disease process regarding the illness itself, likely future symptoms and their management and information about EoL treatment options. In addition, health care professionals tend to avoid discussion of communication with these patients in order to explore clinical issues and end-of-life care issues. As a result, theses patients' needs in terms of EoL care are unmet. The findings of these studies all call for palliative care will benefit to advanced COPD patients.</p>
<p>Future research should further assess how best to apply the palliative care to COPD patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, T. R., Hu, W. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.93</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.93</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Internet]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The end-of-life care for patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Primary Care Community Including Out of Hours</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>93</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>93</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/93-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hoping for the best and preparing for the worst: end-of-life attitudes of the elderly]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/93-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper describes findings from research based on 514 elderly persons (mean age=76.7, SD 8.0) living in a US metropolitan community about their attitudes toward and plans for end of life care. Individual interviews reveal that most respondents were not afraid to die but feared suffering near the end of life. End of life plans were typically undertaken to protect family members from feeling burdened. The most frequently reported plans included living wills, durable power of attorney and funeral arrangements. Elders were far more likely to discuss plans with adult children and other family than with physicians or other health care professionals.</p>
<p>Attitudes of respondents regarding death and dying may be characterized by the adage &lsquo;hope for the best and prepare for the worst.&rsquo; Accordingly, only a small minority reported often worrying about their health (13.2%). When facing a hypothetical incurable illness, 80.3% endorsed remaining hopeful and planning activities unrelated to their illness. Similarly, 80.6% felt that people who have in incurable illness should focus on preparing for end of life issues. These elders also valued preservation of comfort through pain medications (85.6%), being surrounded by friends and family near the end of life (90.3%), and having others pray for them (91.8%). The vast majority of respondents preferred to die at home, if possible (92.3%). These data point to determination and planfulness, coupled with optimism, as elders consider the end of life.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kahana, B., Kahana, E., Lovegreen, L., Brown, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.94</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.94</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pain (neurology), Child health, End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hoping for the best and preparing for the worst: end-of-life attitudes of the elderly]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Primary Care Community Including Out of Hours</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>93</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>93</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/93-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Making health choices: advance care planning in aged care. Perception versus reality]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/93-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Making Health Choices pilot project being undertaken within Residential Aged Care Facilities in Victoria (Australia) by the Respecting Patient Choices team is currently undergoing evaluation. This presentation will provide insight into pre-existing knowledge and perceptions of advance care planning (ACP) in a group of residential aged care staff, prior to a major ACP education program.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Project evaluation methods</st>
<p>We conducted a pre-implementation survey of staff knowledge attitudes and behaviours around ACP. Feedback from ACP debrief sessions held during the course of the education program was examined for significant themes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The staff survey revealed disparities between staff perceptions of their skill and confidence in conducting ACP conversations and findings relating to the accuracy of their ACP knowledge and attitudes towards ACP. Nearly half of staff surveyed indicated they were comfortable (46%) and skilled (45%) with ACP/End-of-life discussion. However, the majority of participants reported a lack of confidence in their knowledge of key areas such as surrogate decision makers (75%) and of state laws regarding ACPs (88%). Responders performed at just above chance on a true/false test of ACP knowledge.</p>
<p>ACP Debrief sessions reflected participants concerns about the challenging nature of ACP discussions and general ACP provision within the Australian aged care context.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The findings of the evaluation to date will be discussed in terms of ACP sustainability, future education models and in the context of systemic challenges facing the Australian Residential Aged Care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sjanta, R., Jackson, L., Fullam, R., Silvester, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.95</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.95</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Making health choices: advance care planning in aged care. Perception versus reality]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>93</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>94</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/94-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance care planning in Japanese nursing homes]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/94-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Japan has the highest rate of ageing worldwide. In Japan, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is concerned that there are insufficient doctors to care for the elderly in nursing homes and also insufficient advance care planning (ACP). In Japan, the study of the ACP at the nursing home just still started.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The study aim was to evaluate the utility of ACP at the nursing home, supported by an ACP clinician trained in the National Centre for Geriatrics and Gerontology in Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Out of 80 families of nursing home residents, 51 participated in this study with all attending a lecture about ACP.</p>
<p>We investigated the following:</p>
<p>Do the families of the residents prefer the nursing home as the place for the residents' last moments?</p>
<p>Would the families like the residents to use mechanical ventilators, gastric feeding tubes, blood transfusion, intravenous infusion or sedative drugs in their terminal states?</p>
<p>Do the families prefer to care for the residents on their deathbeds at the nursing home, even if death certificates are not promptly issued because the nursing home does not have any full-time doctors?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Intervention by a trained ACP clinician significantly increased the number of families who chose terminal care at the nursing home, and the nursing home as the place for the residents' last moments, even if death certificates are not promptly issued (p&lt;0.01).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A trained ACP clinician is useful for ACP in the nursing home.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nishikawa, M., Nakashima, K., Miura, H., Endo, H., Toba, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.96</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.96</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health policy, Haematology (incl blood transfusion), Hospice, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance care planning in Japanese nursing homes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>94</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>94</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/94-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management of depression among the elderly patients in ward 3 Geriatric ward using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/94-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>The geriatric trained nurses in Khoo Teck Puat Hospital wanted to assess the degree of depression in the elderly patients. Thus they used the geriatric Depression scale (GDS) created by Yesavage et al. to assess the patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The GDS created by Yesavage et.al (1986) has been tested and used extensively in the older population. The GDS created in 1983 had 30 questions but this was simplified in 1986 to 15 questions with scores above 5 representing depression of ascending severity. Score of 0&ndash;4 are considered normal, complaints of 5&ndash;8 indicate mild depression, 9&ndash;11 moderate depression and 12&ndash;15 indicate severe depression. This short form was used on 12 elderly patients aged between 75&ndash;83 in Geriatric ward. The data collection was for 1 month.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>Five of the patients had earlier referral to a psychologist. This led the psychologist to assess and find these patients moderately depressed. They received outpatient psychologist appointments. Four were found to be severely depressed and had earlier referral to psychiatrists and Medical Social workers. All 4 had to be institutionalized in the Institute of Mental Health in Singapore. All of these patients were also started on anti-depressants. 2 were found to be mildly depressed receiving a score of 5&ndash;8. Both these patients were not started on anti-depressants but were given outpatient referrals to psychologists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The GDS is a brief, non-somatically focused and can be either an observer or self-administered. The nurses could assess this tool easily and found it a good tool to administer.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheah, E., Rajaram, S., Chua, H. C., Ng, H. L., Tim, H. M., Fadillah, F., Zheng, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.97</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.97</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Psychogeriatrics, Immunology (including allergy), Psychiatry of old age]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management of depression among the elderly patients in ward 3 Geriatric ward using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>94</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>94</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/94-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Managing functional decline among the elderly patients in ward 3 Geriatric ward using the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/94-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living commonly referred to as Katz ADL by Katz et al (1970) is the most appropriate instrument to assess functional status as a measurement of the person's ability to perform acts of daily living independently.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>This Katz ADL was used in 15 geriatric patients aged between 78&ndash;84. The instrument employs a dichotomous (yes or no) scale, with 1 point given for each ADL in which the patient is independent. Six signifies independence in all ADLs: the lowest is 0 t full assistance is needed. The index ranks adequacy in performance in the six functions of bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence and feeding. Six indicates full function, four indicate moderate impairment and two or less indicates severe impairment. 15 assessed, 9 had moderate impairment and 6 severe impairment, none of them had full function.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>Nine had moderate impairment were given extensive rehabilitation. Physiotherapists and occupational therapists assessed them twice a day. Five continued to improve and were discharged with therapy appointments. Four worsened had to be downgraded to severe impairment. They also were not able to look after themselves and were discharged to long term care (nursing homes) 6 had severe impairment, 2 after a month of rehab were upgraded to moderate impairment and discharged with occupational therapy and physiotherapy appointments. Four were not able to manage on their own and had to be transferred to nursing homes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The Katz Index has emerged as an especially useful tool in assessing older adults, in determining nursing load and predicting length of hospitalisation, morbidity and mortality over time. The Katz Index has determined accuracy in predicting functional outcome over time among older adults.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheah, E., Rajaram, S., Chua, H. C., Ng, H. L., Tim, H. M., Fadillah, F., Zheng, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.98</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.98</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Other rehabilitative therapies, Physiotherapy, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Managing functional decline among the elderly patients in ward 3 Geriatric ward using the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>94</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>95</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/95-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Managing the cognitive impairment of elderly patients using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/95-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cognitive impairment is no longer considered a normal and inevitable change of ageing. Although older adults are at a higher risk than the rest of the population, changes in cognitive function often call for prompt and aggressive function. In older patients cognitive functioning is especially likely to decline during illness or injury. The nurses' assessment of an older adult's cognitive status is instrumental in identifying early changes in physiological status, ability to learn and learning responses to treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The Mini Mental State Examination created by Folstein et al in 1975 (MMSE) is a tool that can be used to systematically and thoroughly assess mental status. It is a 11 &ndash;question measure that tests five areas of cognitive function: orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall and language. The maximum score is 30. A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment. The MMSE only takes 5&ndash;10 min to administer and is therefore practical to use repeatedly and routinely.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>10 patients were assessed. 3 of the patients were found to have problems with orientation, 2 of them with registration, 2 of them with attention and calculation, 2 of them with recall and 1 of them with language. 9 patients out of the 10 were assessed and had to be placed in nursing homes and this was reflected in their application for nursing homes. Assessment of the older adult's cognitive function is best achieved when it is done routinely, systematically and thoroughly.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The MMSE is effective as a screening instrument to separate patients with cognitive impairment from those without it. In addition when used repeatedly the instrument is able to measure changes in cognitive status that may benefit from intervention.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheah, E., Rajaram, S., Chua, H. C., Ng, H. L., Tim, H. M., Cinnappan, S., Lim, S. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.99</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.99</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Memory disorders (psychiatry), Screening (epidemiology), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Managing the cognitive impairment of elderly patients using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>95</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>95</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/95-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance care planning in Japanese nursing homes]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/95-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Japan has the highest rate of aging worldwide. In Japan, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is concerned that there are insufficient doctors to care for the elderly in nursing homes and also insufficient advance care planning (ACP). In Japan, the study of the ACP at the nursing home just still started.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The study aim was to evaluate the utility of ACP at the nursing home, supported by an ACP clinician trained in the National Centre for Geriatrics and Gerontology in Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Out of 80 families of nursing home residents, 51 participated in this study with all attending a lecture about ACP.</p>
<p>We investigated the following:</p>
<p>Do the families of the residents prefer the nursing home as the place for the residents' last moments?</p>
<p>Would the families like the residents to use mechanical ventilators, gastric feeding tubes, blood transfusion, intravenous infusion or sedative drugs in their terminal states?</p>
<p>Do the families prefer to care for the residents on their deathbeds at the nursing home, even if death certificates are not promptly issued because the nursing home does not have any full-time doctors?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Intervention by a trained ACP clinician significantly increased the number of families who chose terminal care at the nursing home, and the nursing home as the place for the residents' last moments, even if death certificates are not promptly issued (p&lt;0.01).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A trained ACP clinician is useful for ACP in the nursing home.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nishikawa, M., Nakashima, K., Miura, H., Endo, H., Toba, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.100</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.100</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health policy, Haematology (incl blood transfusion), Hospice, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance care planning in Japanese nursing homes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>95</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>95</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/95-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Delaying cognitive decline in nursing home residents with mentally stimulating and physical activities: a randomized controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/95-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Nursing homes, especially those in developing countries, are understaffed and favor physical over psychosocial care. However, leisure activities, especially those that can be run with little professional staff cost, may be highly beneficial. This study examined the effects of mentally stimulating (mahjong) and physical (Tai Chi) leisure activities on the cognitive functioning of nursing home residents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>110 residents from six nursing homes in Hong Kong were randomized into three conditions: (a) mahjong, (b) Tai Chi and (c) handicrafts (placebo). Inclusion criteria were Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) &ge;10 and &le;24, and suffering from at least very mild dementia (Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) &ge;0.5). Exclusion criteria were audio/visual impairment, and contraindication to do mahjong or Tai Chi. Each activity was carried out three times a week over a 3-month period. Outcome measures including MMSE, verbal memory (both immediate and delayed recall), digit memory (forward and backward), categorical fluency and CDR were collected at baseline, post-treatment (3 months), 6 months and 9 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There were moderate effects of mahjong on all outcome measures except CDR up to 6 months, but no benefits for the Tai Chi group over the placebo.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Leisure activities can be highly beneficial even for older adults with significant cognitive impairment and frailty. This study provides strong evidence for the effectiveness of mahjong in maintaining cognitive abilities in this population. It can be implemented in nursing homes with minimal staff cost. While this was a time-limited intervention, regular mahjong activities should provide long-term benefits.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheng, S. T., Chow, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.101</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.101</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Memory disorders (neurology), Memory disorders (psychiatry)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Delaying cognitive decline in nursing home residents with mentally stimulating and physical activities: a randomized controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>95</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>95</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/96-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sustainable ACP in aged care facilities with dedicated time and funding]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/96-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Barwon Health is Victoria's largest regional health service. Alan David Lodge (ADL) is an Aged Care Facility providing high level care for approximately 105 residents.</p>
<p>Advance care planning (ACP) is included in the goals of care for residents at ADL but had not been fully implemented due to staff limitations, in particular the availability of time, for trained staff to facilitate the ACP process. The Respecting Patient Choices (RPC) program at Barwon Health provided funding for a dedicated 4 h per week over a 6-month period to allow staff that had previously completed RPC training/workshops to facilitate ACP at ADL.</p>
<p>RPC program provided education sessions and support for staff and this together with dedicated time to facilitate the process, produced a significant increase in participation of residents and families in ACP through consultation with familiar staff whereby there is an established rapport.</p>
<p>It was anticipated that improved quality of care for residents and a reduction in the incidence of family/staff conflict would result by ensuring medical treatment and personal wishes were known prior to a health crisis. The potential improvement in resource allocation through reduced acute admissions, dislocation and medical interventions was also highly probable but not measurable during the project period.</p>
<p>Overall there was a marked increase in ACP uptake and the outcomes of the project demonstrated that with a moderate amount of dedicated funding and allocated hours a sustainable model for ACP in aged care facilities is achievable.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neale, D., Mann, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.102</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.102</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Trauma, Quality improvement, Injury]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sustainable ACP in aged care facilities with dedicated time and funding]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>96</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>96</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/96-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effective measures towards satisfactory and enjoyable retirement period in Nigeria]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/96-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>As one works for a paid job for many years there will come a time of rest. This is the period of retirement. Retirement is actually for elderly people. Retirement may involve leaving a paid job one has been engaged in for 10&ndash;35 years or more. There is really no need for an individual to be afraid of retirement if one is fully prepared for it. The most important thing is to retire at the right time when one actually needs it. In order to enjoy one's retirement period, it involves planning ahead one's working life. This also involves a change of attitude and perception of what retirement is. There is need to see retirement period as a time or stage in which an individual transits from working to earn money to a period in which money works for one. This study investigated the hindrances and measures for promoting satisfactory and enjoyable retirement period in Nigeria. The population comprised of Nutritionists, Home Economists, Nurses, Medical doctors, civil servants, retired men and women from five states in Nigeria (Oshun, Delta, Lagos, Edo and Ekiti States). A sample of 250 persons was randomly selected. Questionnaire was used for data collection. The data were tabulated and analyzed by computing the percentages, mean, SD and variance of the responses. T-test was the test statistics employed. Results showed the followings as major hindrances to successful retirement: Fear of retirement, unpreparedness for retirement, having little or no savings, owing of debts before retirement, having too much of financial commitment, negative attitude to retirement. Some of the measures for promoting satisfactory and enjoyable retirement are as follows; Understanding the concepts/purpose of retirement, planning and saving substantially ahead for retirement, seeing retirement as a period of reward when one does not work for money but when money works for one; Getting good ideas from older retirees; Adequate budgeting and purchasing only necessary items; taking up a less strenuous part-time or full-time job; Maintaining a healthy life style, (Exercising regularly, eating of balanced diet and keeping to principles of hygiene). There were some significant differences (p&lt;0.05) between the responses of the medical practitioners (doctors/nurses) and the Home Economists/Nutritionists on the measures for promoting satisfactory/enjoyable retirement. It was recommended that workers should be retirement-conscious right from when they take up their appointment. They should plan and save ahead for retirement. Those who are about to retire should develop positive attitude towards retirement period. Retirement Education should be given to workers and retirees.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Imonikebe, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.103</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.103</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diet]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effective measures towards satisfactory and enjoyable retirement period in Nigeria]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>96</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>96</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/96-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Deaths in older adults in England]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/96-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We will present key results from the report, &lsquo;Deaths in Older Adults in England' produced by the South West Public Health Observatory on behalf of the National End of Life Care Intelligence Network. This report describes differences in place and cause of death in older people and is part of work to provide information and evidence to support the End of Life Care Strategy.</p>
<p>The report analysed deaths in people aged 75 and over registered in England in 2006&ndash;2008 (source: ONS mortality data). There were differences in underlying cause of death and place of death according to age and sex. In people aged 75 and over, a higher proportion of deaths in females were from pneumonia (organism unspecified), stroke and dementia compared with males. Deaths from senility and dementia were more common with increasing age. In people aged 75 and over, a greater proportion of males than females died in hospital or in their own residence, while a lower proportion of males than females died in nursing homes and old people's homes.</p>
<p>It is important to consider the implications of these findings when planning end of life care services as two-thirds of deaths in England are in people aged 75 and over and, in the future, the proportion of deaths in the oldest age groups are expected to increase further.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verne, J., Ruth, K., Pring, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.104</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.104</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), Stroke, End of life decisions (palliative care), Memory disorders (psychiatry), Pneumonia (respiratory medicine), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Deaths in older adults in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>96</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>96</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/96-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A survey of opinion regarding wishes toward the end-of-life among thai elderly]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/96-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Advance-care-planning has not been a popular concept among eastern countries despite of the growing awareness in western world. In order to provide optimal end-of-life care, the patients' wish is an essential component but unfortunately is often impossible to seek for when the time is approached. We surveyed older people attending Geriatric clinic at Siriraj Hospital to enquire their wishes concerning end-of-life in hoping of carry out proper care in this regard.</p>
<p>All of the participants were Buddhism with mean age of 75.8 (7.8).</p>
<p>Approximately half of subjects had less than 4 years of education, 75% were female and 31% rated themselves as being in good health. Majority of elderly wanted to know the truth of their physical condition, to be involved in decision making or name a decision maker. Freedom from suffering symptoms and unfinished business, presence of love one and being mentally aware near the time of death were attributes rated as highly important in most participants. 75% did not want to receive treatments to prolong life when chance of surviving is slim.</p>
<p>Interestingly, 55% of elderly did not want to die at home and 32% did not wish to have any religious ritual conducted near the time of death.</p>
<p>Having less than 4 years of education was the only factor that found to be significantly associated with unwilling to die at home with OR of 2.89 (95%CI 1.10 to 10.71) after adjusted in multivariate analysis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Srinonprasert, V., Kajornkijaroen, A., Kornbongkotmart, S., Praditsuwan, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.105</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.105</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A survey of opinion regarding wishes toward the end-of-life among thai elderly]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>96</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/97-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Difference is opinion regarding end-of-life between older patients and their family, a Thai perspective]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/97-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Making decision for the love ones toward the end-of-life is a sensitive and complex task. Having established advance care plan is rarely occurred in Eastern culture. The discordance among patients and decision makers has been documented in literature but never been explored in Thailand. We conducted a survey among geriatric patients using 5-category likert scale, 13-situation-based questionnaire. We also enquired the families to rate how they believed what older patients would have thought regarding issues in end-of-life care.</p>
<p>Elderly and their families demonstrated fairly similar attitude for most of the items inquired. However, significant higher proportion of patients wished not to be a burden to their families and not to prolong suffers when chance of survival is slim.</p>
<p>Of note, only 45.2% of patients wished to pass away at home while 70% of family believed that older patients would have wanted to die at home. Factor associated with agreeing to die at home were age less than 75, having education more than 4 years and being single with OR of 2.93 (1.39 to 6.16; p=0.005), 2.76 (1.30 to 5.87; p=0.009) and 2.78 (1.33 to 5.83; p=0.007),respectively</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kajornkijaroen, A., Srinonprasert, V., Kornbongkotmart, S., Praditsuwan, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.106</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.106</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Difference is opinion regarding end-of-life between older patients and their family, a Thai perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/97-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An experience of a care home in northeastern Brazil]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/97-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Home care in Brazil is still precarious. In most regions, it is restricted to treatment of patients with low complexity performed by primary care with the intention of prevention and promotion health. Until 2010, there was not a national policy for home care patients with greater complexity. In most cases they remained hospitalized or care poorly in their houses, suffering from recurrent hospitalizations.</p>
<p>On March 19 last year, the Institute of Medicine Professor Fernando Figueira with the secretary of health of the city of Recife, started one Home Care Services. Already received 139 patients, aged between 13 and 101 years, with various pathologies, children with cerebral palsy, young adult sequelae of gunshot trauma, bedridden woman infected with HTLV, oncology patients and elderly patients with dementia. As a result of this care, there was a reduction in the rate of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, in addition to improved quality of life. Also the quality of death, because it was possible to die at home without having to be referred to the autopsy service to receive the death certificate. But we believe that the best achievement was to show that the daily cost of this service is 10 times smaller than the ICU and three times smaller than a hospital bed. With this we motivate an argument for deployment of a national policy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebelo, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.107</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.107</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cerebral palsy, General practice / family medicine, Memory disorders (neurology), Stroke, Paediatric oncology, Adolescent health, Child health, Memory disorders (psychiatry)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An experience of a care home in northeastern Brazil]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/97-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The survey of opinions regarding good death for geriatric patients from the perspectives of geriatric patients and physicians]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/97-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Nowadays growing concern over providing the best possible end-of-life care for geriatric patients has been raised worldwide. It is not uncommon that different perspectives of patients, families and caring physicians may result in unwanted suffering of dying patients. Learning the differences might lead to appropriate interventions and bring about better quality of care for older patients toward the end of life.</p>
<p>We conducted a survey on older patients and physicians at a university hospital inThailand. We elicited opinions on end-of-life care by applying 5-category likert scale, 13-situation-based questionnaire. Older people were asked to rate their agreement with those items while physicians were enquired to rate their opinions on what they believed older people would have thought. We also enquired participants to rank the most important aspects concerning good death.</p>
<p>Nearly 90% of physicians believed that older people would wish to be involved in decision-making and completing unfinished business while only 70% elderly really did. Being mentally aware was rated by older patients at much higher proportion than physicians. More importantly, one-fourth of older patient did not wish to die at home while only 6% of physician believed so. The only factor associated with not willing to pass away at home among these two groups after adjusted in multivariate analysis was sex. When it came to ranking the most important aspect, older patients place it on not to prolong suffering while this was not ranked on the top-three items by physicians.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kornbongkotmas, S., Srinonprasert, V., Kajornkitjaroen, A., Praditsuwan, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.108</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.108</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Quality improvement]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The survey of opinions regarding good death for geriatric patients from the perspectives of geriatric patients and physicians]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/97-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhanced nursing aides for enhanced care in nursing homes]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/97-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In Singapore, past efforts to develop the capacity and capability in palliative care among health care workers have largely excluded nursing aides, the non-regulated segment of the health care rank and file. More recently, nursing homes in Singapore are eager to use the palliative care approach in the care of the frail elderly. These are largely attended to by nursing aides, supervised by qualified nurses. In January 2010, a part-time 48-h Palliative Care course for Nursing Aides was conducted over 19 sessions. It was designed to prepare selected nursing aides of a nursing home in anticipation of an expanded new residential facility being planned.</p>
<p>A face-to-face individual interview was conducted with the participants 6 months post-course. Open-ended questions based on the learning objectives asked for actual examples that illustrated the application of the new knowledge. Participants gave very heartening narratives that showed understanding of palliative care concepts. For example, one said, the course has &lsquo;opened my heart&rsquo;; another said she felt she was gave hope to her residents who were depressed and afraid; yet another shared that she was able to show care and lead patient to peaceful death; importance of family involvement and comfort during the last days.</p>
<p>Their supervisor reported observations which indicated positive behavioural changes for example, more observant of patients' symptoms, more interested in learning to cope with complex problems, more gentle with the very frail.</p>
<p>The training was worthwhile when the nursing aides expressed deep appreciation for the learning opportunity which has enabled them to give better care to the residents using the palliative care approach.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tan, W. K., Tan, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.109</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.109</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhanced nursing aides for enhanced care in nursing homes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Elderly Care, Aged Care Facility/Care Home</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>98</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/98-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Futility' - let's put it out of its misery]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/98-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Though still on life support, George improved when his infected leg was amputated above the knee. But his wife, Annette, pleaded with the surgeon to withdraw intensive care treatment. George had made her promise that she would never let him have an amputation.</p>
<p>But who has the authority to make this choice? The surgeon believed it was the best medical practice to continue (as treatment was not &lsquo;futile&rsquo;), but George very clearly had a preference, and Annette a responsibility to promote it.</p>
<p>The concept of futility was introduced into this discussion to help resolve this dilemma (which rapidly became a dispute), and, as often happens, failed to produce a resolution.</p>
<p>The notion of futility has been dissected in countless law courts, medical journals and standard textbooks of medical ethics for a generation. But much of the discussion has, ironically, proved futile and numbers of publications in this area is rapidly falling. I suggest that futility, as originally conceived in a medical setting, is no longer a valid concept, and, like euthanasia, is a term better abandoned than further debated.</p>
<p>I suggest that, as in debates about &lsquo;best interests&rsquo; (another term looking for a definition), all discussion eventually returns to what the patient or family might have seen as important. The very basis of futility, originally conceived as a medical judgement based on probabilities, has disappeared.</p>
<p>I contend that we abandon the term, and instead invest in fair and transparent processes that maximise authentic and justifiable decisions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saul, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.110</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.110</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Adult intensive care, Orthopaedic and trauma surgery, Assisted dying, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Futility' - let's put it out of its misery]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hospital, Critical And Intensive Care, Accident And Emergency (A[amp   ]E)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>98</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/98-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increase the qualities of hospice care in ICUs]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/98-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The concept of hospice care in critical care unit is to provide a &lsquo;good death&rsquo; to patients with terminal illness. The purpose of this project was to promote the quality of hospice care in critical care units. According to the investigation, we found that nurses in ICUs do not follow the SOP of hospice care, lack of audit and quality control, lack of knowledge of hospice care of critical care, those reasons cause the low satisfaction rate of hospice care of nurses in critical care unit.</p>
<p>We developed the checklist of the signs and symptoms of pre-dying, a brochure for families including useful information of S/S of dying and funeral, beauty package for nurses to use for patient beauty at the end of life, arrange lecture of hospice care of critical care unit. Through the above activities, the Implementation rate of hospice care in ICUs was 100%, the satisfaction rate of nurses increased to 4.2, the score of quality of hospice care increased 25%. We expected the result of this project can provide some ideas of hospice care in ICUs then promote the qualities of hospice care in ICUs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsai, Y. M., Hnug, L. C., Lee, P. Y., Hsu, S. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.111</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.111</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Adult intensive care, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increase the qualities of hospice care in ICUs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hospital, Critical And Intensive Care, Accident And Emergency (A[amp   ]E)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>98</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/98-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The role of palliative and end-of-life clinical nurse specialist in accident and emergency and the acute medical unit]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/98-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) was employed in a pilot role based in A&amp;E/AMU at Heatherwood and Wexham Park NHS Foundation Trust (9&ndash;5 Monday to Friday) caring for patients who had palliative and end of life care needs The post holder undertook a holistic assessment of patient and family needs and developed a plan of care including guidance of life expectancy, Symptom management, Do Not Attempt Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation status (DNACPR) and preferred place of care communicating this to the patients, GP, Care home, Community and hospital teams and families.</p>
<p>Data re source of referral and interventions was collected on a daily basis onto an excel spreadsheet, according to Caldicott principles to aid evaluation of the outcomes of the role.</p>
<p>Evaluation of the pilot has shown that;</p>
<p>(A) 15% patients can be assessed and with early development of a care plan communicated to other agencies, discharged from A&amp;E/AMU back to care home, home or directly to a hospice thereby ensuring that care occurs in the preferred place. This also reduces inappropriate hospital readmissions.</p>
<p>(B) The length of stay for those patients who clinically need admission is reduced to 8 days (against an SHA average of 18).</p>
<p>(C) The 14% of patients that died in A&amp;E/AMU received expert.</p>
<p>symptom management and family support.</p>
<p>(D) A&amp;E/AMU staff received support, training and modeling of good practice.</p>
<p>Through an evaluative questionnaire the pilot has demonstrated improved patient and staff experience and satisfaction.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brockis, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.112</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.112</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The role of palliative and end-of-life clinical nurse specialist in accident and emergency and the acute medical unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hospital, Critical And Intensive Care, Accident And Emergency (A[amp   ]E)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>98</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/99-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Investigation on the use of advance directives for patients attending a hospital in Japan]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/99-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In Japan, living wills and advance directives (AD) are not commonly used, and there is no system or law to support the decision making of patients. Furthermore, there is no available law about the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments or appointment of a medical attorney. Thus, medical staff must deal with ethical dilemmas related to medical decision making in end-stage disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To investigate the use of AD for patients attending a hospital of the National Centre for Geriatrics and Gerontology for treatment from May, 2008.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We examined the contents described in ADs and assessed the trend of the wishes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>To date 127 people (67 female, average age 74.6) have participated. Many have respiratory diseases (26 people) and malignant disorders (21 people). Most people wished to nominate an attorney but only one had a medical attorney, 111 people did not wish for resuscitation. More than 90% did not wish for life-sustaining treatment (respirator, or tube feeding), whereas the wish for intravenous feeding was relatively high (32.3%). As for the place of death, 62 people wished to die in hospital and the least preferred place was at home (11 people).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We found that many Japanese, during their end-of-life care, want to die in hospital while receiving some kind of treatment such as intravenous feeding. The construction of the system to support the decision making of the patients is an urgent problem in Japan.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miura, H., Nishikawa, M., Nakashima, K., Hong, Y. J., Detering, K., Jones, D., Silvester, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.113</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.113</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Investigation on the use of advance directives for patients attending a hospital in Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hospital, Critical And Intensive Care, Accident And Emergency (A[amp   ]E)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>99</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/99-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance Care Planning (PEACE) for care home residents in an acute hospital setting: impact on ongoing advance care planning and readmissions]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/99-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>PEACE (Proactive Elderly Advance CarE) is an advance care planning (ACP) developed at two acute hospital sites in London, UK, for care home (nursing) residents prior to discharge. Patient's preferences are documented, or in the cases of mental incapacity, best interests decisions are made, to give clinical advice and escalation decisions for future medical care. The document is sent on transfer back to nursing homes, as agreed with GPs and care homes.</p>
<p>At Site 1, 20 patients were discharged with PEACE and 80% (N=16/20) were followed up at 2 weeks after transfer. 69% (N=11/16) of PEACE documents were in place in the nursing notes. ACPs had further been developed from PEACE in 73% (N=8/11). None of these residents were readmitted to the discharging hospital to date. However, of those residents whose ACPs were not further developed, 37.5% (N=3/8) were readmitted inappropriately (palliative plans), and 25% (N=2/8) were readmitted appropriately as judged by their original PEACE document in 3 months.</p>
<p>At Site 2, 12/37 patients discharged over 4 months were sent with a PEACE document. 25% (N=3/12) of patients with a PEACE document were readmitted within 6 months, only 8% (N=1/12) inappropriately. 56% (N=14/25) of nursing home residents discharged without PEACE in the same period were readmitted.</p>
<p>Our findings suggest that PEACE may reduce inappropriate readmissions. The results also suggest that PEACE is useful in supporting further ACP after transfer to care homes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hayes, N., Kalsi, T., Steves, C., Martin, F., Evans, J., Schiff, R., Briant, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.114</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.114</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance Care Planning (PEACE) for care home residents in an acute hospital setting: impact on ongoing advance care planning and readmissions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hospital, Critical And Intensive Care, Accident And Emergency (A[amp   ]E)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>99</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/99-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Variations in hospital death]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/99-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Death largely occurs in old age and there are large variations in the proportion of hospital deaths by Local Authorities (LAs) in England. In the period between 2007 and 2009 deaths occurring in hospital ranged between 43% and 75% with about 12% of LAs having less than 50% hospital deaths. Funnel plots are powerful tools that can be adapted for use in showing and understanding the variations in hospital deaths in English LAs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To explore variations in proportion of hospital deaths in LAs by age of population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Age specific mortality data relating to place of death were extracted from ONS mortality files for years 2007&ndash;2009. Hospital deaths as a proportion of all deaths in LAs were calculated and funnel plots were used to study variations by population size and by age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The proportions of LA deaths in hospital are overdispersed, with more LAs lying outside the control limits of the funnel plot than would be expected if the size of a LA were the only factor predicting hospital death. Factors such as social deprivation, demographics and local End of Life (EOL) care service configuration contribute to the overdispersion for example, some LAs provide specialist palliative care services within hospitals while others provide this service elsewhere. EOL care in less well organised LAs may result in people near the EOL being unnecessarily admitted to die in hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Place to place comparison of hospital deaths reveals stack differences which must be understood to ensure equality of care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Osinowo, A., Pring, A., Verne, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.115</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.115</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Variations in hospital death]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hospital, Critical And Intensive Care, Accident And Emergency (A[amp   ]E)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>99</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/99-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Religious affiliation on end-of-life decisions in intensive care units]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/99-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>End of life is frequently enforced in intensive care units in several countries. Recent surveys have shown that medical practices for end of life vary between countries among health care professionals. Religious affiliation has been included among other factors such as culture, attitudes of health care professionals, legislation, illness, quality of life and others. The determination and the affiliation of religion in end of life decisions in intensive care units is the objective of this review study. In addition in this review we are presenting the conventions and opinions of major religions regarding end of life care and decisions in intensive care units.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>For this review CINAHL, Pubmed and Medline were searched under the keywords &lsquo;religion&rsquo;, &lsquo;end of life&rsquo; and &lsquo;intensive care units&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There are several different opinions among health care professionals in the issue of religion which influence end of life decisions in intensive care units. Health care professionals must understand patients' and families' religion and culture in order to provide better end of life care in patients. Furthermore, understanding religious affiliation will enhance communication among health care professionals with patients and families. Religious affiliation may support the development of guidelines for end of life practices.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kleanthous, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.116</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.116</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Internet]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Religious affiliation on end-of-life decisions in intensive care units]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hospital, Critical And Intensive Care, Accident And Emergency (A[amp   ]E)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>100</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/100-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Keeping Vigil in hospital - the impact of a care of the dying pathway on non-palliative care staff in an acute hospital setting]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/100-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study was of a qualitative design and consisted of semi-structured interviews of nursing and medical staff in a district general hospital in the northwest of England. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and then thematic analysis was then used to explore emerging themes.</p>
<p>16 interviews took place of non-palliative care staff of all grades and disciplines. Seven nurses and nine doctors were interviewed. Emergent themes were that the pathway is used across all the disciplines that took part with wide use in non-cancer patients. Participants generally felt that the pathway had a positive impact in care of the dying. Perceived barriers included difficulty in diagnosing dying and the review/discontinuation of unnecessary interventions. The amount of training in use of the pathway that participants had had was extremely varied.</p>
<p>Although, the pathway has a perceived positive impact in this acute hospital setting, there are still barriers to its use and variability in confidence and knowledge of those involved in it's use. It would appear that there is a need for mandatory training for health professionals involved in the care of dying patients and the ongoing support of a pathway coordinator.</p>
<p>As a result of this study and other work that has taken place, as well as having an end of life coordinator for the whole hospital, there is now going to be a nominated end of life team from each ward.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Groves, K., Hough, J., Jack, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.117</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.117</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Keeping Vigil in hospital - the impact of a care of the dying pathway on non-palliative care staff in an acute hospital setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hospital, Critical And Intensive Care, Accident And Emergency (A[amp   ]E)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>100</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/100-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A critique of the NHS ADRT proforma]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/100-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>At St Joseph's Hospice the process of documenting advance decisions to refuse treatment (ADRTs) has been shaped by patient and practitioner experiences. To guide this process the proforma available from the ARDTNHS website (http://www.adrtnhs.co.uk) has historically been used. We present a critique of this document, reflecting broader issues concerning how ADRTs are recorded.</p>
<p>In order for ADRTs to be valid and applicable in the UK they should specify both the refusals and the circumstances in which they come into effect. If these exact circumstances do not occur the ADRT does not hold the legal refusal status it otherwise would, although it still might be used to inform decision making. We contend that a clinician's judgment is usually required to determine whether the ADRT circumstances really apply at the moment of decision. Our view is that refusals, and the circumstances in which they apply, can only be properly understood in the context of information that gives rationale and &lsquo;balance&rsquo; to these decisions. In this way the intentions behind the ADRT can be used to interpret the refusals more accurately. This information (which might be found in a separate advance statement) is of such importance that it should be positioned ahead of the refusals in the same ADRT document. Examples will be used to illustrate these points. Successful ADRT documentation is not simple and requires balanced information.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin, J., Sallnow, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.118</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.118</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A critique of the NHS ADRT proforma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative Care, Hospice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>100</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/100-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Life before death: living well, leaving well]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/100-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The &lsquo;Life Before Death&rsquo; initiative is conceived and spearheaded by a Singapore philanthropic foundation to advocate and create greater awareness of the need to improve care for the dying.</p>
<p>First conceived as a local campaign in Singapore in 2006, &lsquo;Life Before Death&rsquo; has evolved as an ongoing social experiment that harnesses unconventional online and offline initiatives to break the taboo of death and to foster &lsquo;die-logues&rsquo; or conversations on end-of-life matters.</p>
<p>The Singapore initiative reached out to the terminally ill and their caregivers using print advertisements, radio talk shows, newspaper editorial features, TV documentaries and a caregiver's diary. A national street poll on death attitudes was conducted to spur &lsquo;die-logues&rsquo; on end-of-life issues.</p>
<p>Today, the initiative works with diverse partners to reach a wider global audience through social media, films, photography, cartoons and art, enthusing the public to view life and death differently. A recent project, &lsquo;Happy Coffins&rsquo;, allowed people to personalize coffins for themselves or a loved one, and by so doing, overcome the stigma of death.</p>
<p>The Foundation commissioned the first-ever global Quality of Death index that ranked 40 countries on their provision of end-of-life care. In the pipeline is an international feature documentary that examines the global crisis of untreated pain and end-of-life care. Shot in 10 countries, the film has attracted diverse participation from 40 nationalities.</p>
<p>This initiative demonstrates how a ground-up non-profit effort can create conversations and greater awareness of end-of-life care, as well as spur advocacy for better care for the dying</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, P. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.119</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.119</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pain (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Life before death: living well, leaving well]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative Care, Hospice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>100</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/100-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Current status and physician's attitude toward advance care planning in hospice palliative care units in Japan]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/100-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine the current status and physicians' attitude toward ACP in PCU in Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>We conducted a questionnaire survey and retrospective chart review of 203 certified PCU in December 2010.</p>
<p>We received permission to perform a retrospective chart review of ACP before and during admission, and who made the decision to admit a patient into the hospice palliative care program for the last 3 patients who died before 30 November 2010 in each PCU. Physicians working in the PCU were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their attitude toward, and practice of ACP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main results</st>
<p>Among 203 PCUs contacted, 95 participated (response rate 47%). 285 patients were reviewed. The percentage of patients for whom their physicians expressed their intentions regarding implementation of CPR, mechanical ventilation, antibiotics, tube feeding, artificial hydration and Power of Attorney of health care prior to admission to PCU was 44%, 44%, 9%, 15%, 29% and 41% respectively. However during their admission this increased to 47%, 46%, 19%, 18%, 43% and 49% respectively. 70% of patients had a physician's order to implement DNAR and 44% of families consented to implementation of the DNAR order without discussing the issue with the patient. We also assessed physicians' attitudes toward and practice of ACP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study will clarify the current status of and physicians' attitude toward ACP in PCU in Japan, and provide evidence of the unique cultural diversity toward end-of-life care and ACP among Japanese.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kizawa, Y., Shima, Y., Tsuneto, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.120</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.120</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Interventional cardiology, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Mechanical ventilation, Mechanical ventilation, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Current status and physician's attitude toward advance care planning in hospice palliative care units in Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative Care, Hospice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>101</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/101-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Linking human rights with advance care planning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/101-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>There are five Human Rights Standards related to Palliative Care 9Open Society Institute Human Rights Standards (2007)). Are these Human Rights Standards compatible with Advance Care Planning?</p>
<p>This presentation will outline the Human Rights Standards related to palliative care and link them to Advance Care Planning. In addition, the presentation will address identifiable, unmet Human Rights needs pertaining to an Advance Care Plan (as per Victoria, Australia).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tehan, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.121</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.121</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Human rights]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Linking human rights with advance care planning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative Care, Hospice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>101</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>101</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/101-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[End-of-life PSP module in BC]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/101-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The GP Services Committee (GPSC) is a joint Ministry of Health &ndash; BC Medical Association committee with the mandate of improving Primary Care in British Columbia. The Practice Support Program (PSP) was developed to encourage and support Family Physicians to undertake QI initiatives.</p>
<p>While the initial modules targeted family practice, in December 2010, the PSP expanded to a broader program designed to integrate Family Practice, Palliative Care, Specialty Care and Home and Community Care around improving the provision of end-of-life services for patients and their families. Two major components of this module are:<l type="tab"><li><p>(1) Advance Care Planning using the &lsquo;My Voice&rsquo; tool developed by BC Fraser Health Authority</p>
</li><li>
<p>(2) Foundational concepts for identification, assessment and planning taken from the UK Gold Standards Framework.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Provincial legislation on &lsquo;Advance Directives&rsquo; is to be implemented in BC later in 2011. Family physicians, specialists, their staff and front line health care providers are being trained and supported by Regional Support Teams to facilitate colleagues undertaking the End-of-Life PSP module across BC. The goal is to improve the use of ACP, communications, collaboration of care provided by the full healthcare.</p>
<p>Tools have been developed to assist family physicians in shifting to a palliative approach to care and increase their comfort in undertaking advanced care planning with patients identified on their registry. This poster board will highlight both the PSP process as it promotes Advance Care Planning in BC as well as demonstrate some of the electronic tools that have been developed to support End-of-Life Care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clelland, C., McGregor, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.122</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.122</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[End-of-life PSP module in BC]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative Care, Hospice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>101</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>101</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/101-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reasons cited by ESRD patients and caregivers for withdrawal from hemodialysis]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/101-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of the study was to explore the reasons End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients and caregivers withdraw from hemodialysis in South Taiwan. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with three patients and three caregivers individually, and analyzed by a content analysis method.</p>
<p>The study found patients and caregivers each had five different concerns influencing the decision to withdraw from hemodialysis. For the patients, these were as: (1) Patients would like to continue hemodialysis, but trust their doctor's judgment in recommending the treatment be discontinued. (2) Physical deterioration (3) Lack of access to hemodialysis (4) The burden on the family (5) Lack of value or dignity in their lives. Caregivers' concerns were: (1) Self-criticism and self-blame for giving up on patients (2) Respect for patients' own decisions (3) The economic burden on the family (4) The suffering caused to the patient by disease progression (5) Respect for the opinions of medical professionals. The findings suggest that ESRD patients and caregivers have quite different reasons for withdrawing from hemodialysis. Advance care planning should provide clear information about disease progress and medical treatment options, and help ESRD patients and caregivers openly express their anxieties and opinions, empathizing with one another while making decisions for end of life care.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the study has revealed a range of concerns from hemodialysis patients and caregivers. As medical professionals, we should initiate discussion on advance care planning to help patients and caregivers clarify their ideas and reach informed agreement on the decision to withdraw from hemodialysis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Two, S. N., Hu, W. Y., Lee, H. T. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.123</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.123</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Dialysis, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reasons cited by ESRD patients and caregivers for withdrawal from hemodialysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative Care, Hospice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>101</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>101</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/101-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative care services for advanced non-malignant lung diseases in Taiwan]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/101-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Although hospice services has been available for cancer patients for 20 years in Taiwan, that for non-malignant diseases was started only since September, 2009. How well clinicians in this country are prepared for this challenge is unknown. A questionnaire was completed by 149 mostly respiratory clinicians (including 41 physicians, 65 nurses, 36 respiratory therapists,) in three large hospitals from northern, central and southern Taiwan. Although hospice inpatient, outpatient and home care services were provided by all 3 hospitals, only 24&ndash;35% of clinicians reported easy access of these services. Fifty percent of physicians had referred patients at risk of respiratory failure to palliative care team, and the main reasons of non-referral were resource factors and no request by patients. Only 8.1% of all respondents had explicit policies and procedures of end-of-life care for patients with non-malignant lung diseases in their hospitals. Such policies or procedures were thought to be developed by the hospice team in 8.1%, and by pulmonologist or intensivist in 6.7%. For COPD patients, majority of physicians suggested discussion of end-of-life issues when patients were in severe disease (GOLD stage III), less than 100 m in 6-min walking test, after 2 to 3 admissions or ER visits for acute exacerbations in the past year, or after 1 respiratory failure attack. Almost all of them considered current palliative care for non-malignant lung disease patients having a long way to go to meet their needs. Among others, professional recruitment and development, public education and medical practice guidelines were those most urgently expected.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chan, T. T., Lin, M. S., Yu, C. J., Hsu, J. Y., Wang, J. D., Yan, Y. H., Partridge, M., Chen, C. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.124</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.124</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Guidelines]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative care services for advanced non-malignant lung diseases in Taiwan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative Care, Hospice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>101</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>102</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/102-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing an advance care planning tool - opportunities and challenges]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/102-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The advance care planning document developed acts as a framework for opening up a discussion between patient and the health or social care professional, and maintains the patient at the centre of the discussion.</p>
<p>It comprises three main sections; advance statement, advance decisions and contact information. Collating this information in one document facilitates a potentially difficult discussion to have with patients; prompting the palliative care team into asking the relevant questions and recording them in a logical, complete yet succinct format. This work builds upon other documents used by palliative care teams to guide such discussions but our plan is novel in it's inclusion of both advance statement and advance decision sections.</p>
<p>We have already generated quantitative and qualitative data from users and facilitators of the document which we are currently piloting in Worcester by asking them to complete a questionnaire evaluating the usability as well as practical and emotional relevance from the perspectives of the facilitator and user respectively. This data can then be used to reflect upon the effectiveness of this document both for the patient and the palliative care team and its value as a county wide document.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alleyne, R., Vaughan, J., Campbell, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.125</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.125</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing an advance care planning tool - opportunities and challenges]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative Care, Hospice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>102</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/102-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transferability of an ACP model across Australian community palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/102-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A study was undertaken to determine whether the Respecting Patient Choices Community Specialist Palliative Care Model developed for community palliative care services in Victoria, Australia was transferable to other Australian states and territories. For ease of reporting it will simply be referred to as the Model. The Model consisted of five domains: governance, advance care planning (ACP) education, ACP documentation processes, community engagement and quality processes. A sequential process for implementation was recommended to embed ACP into organisational practices. A variety of resources were designed to support the services in the process of organisational change. Four community palliative care services participated in the study. The sites differed in geographic location, staff profile, client and family demographics, services offered and different state-based legal and health care structures. Two services were located in Northern Australia and two in Southern Australia. The achievements of the project were in identifying factors in the successful transferability of the Model across different health care contexts. The identified domains of the Model were relevant to all services but what differed was the sequence in which they were implemented. The services worked through the components of the Model in their own ways and to their own timetables. It was clear that implementation resources designed as part of the Model were extremely useful to assist services in the implementation process. This flexibility in the Model design made it transferable to different local contexts. The findings also suggest the Model has potential relevance to an international audience.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackford, J., Street, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.126</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.126</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transferability of an ACP model across Australian community palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative Care, Hospice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>102</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/102-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A psychological profile of middle-age cancer patients' terminal experience in hospice home care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/102-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Cancer patients facing terminal illness have the most complex psychological and reluctant feeling, especially for middle age adults. This paper aims at exploring the middle-age cancer patients' terminal experience from the psychological profile in hospice home care. The research adopted the purposive sampling method and collected data though participatory observation and in-depth interviews. The data were analyzed by the phenomenology qualitative method, and the research field was located in the hospice home care in north Taiwan. In overview, there were four psychological categories from interviewing middle age cancer patients about their terminal experiences in hospice home care, namely: fear, restlessness, depression, as well as ambivalence. Regarding fear, there were three issues that emerged form this theme, which are: (1) fear of inexplicability; (2) fear of no treatment (3) fear of unknown world. Regarding to restlessness, there were three issues under this theme, as namely: (1) irritable mood (2) dysphoria (3) unpeaceful mind. Regarding to depression, there were three issues under this theme: (1) emotional emptiness (2) low mood (3) feeling depression. Regarding to ambivalence, there were three issues under this theme, which are: (1) rising and falling emotionally (2) capricious thoughts (3) uncertainty. Thus, the phenomenon of middle-age cancer patients facing terminal stage presented by the results form this study shown as a phenomenon of resistance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, H. T., Wu, W. Y., Hu, S. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.127</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.127</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A psychological profile of middle-age cancer patients' terminal experience in hospice home care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative Care, Hospice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>102</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/102-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Self-perceived burden to family in terminally ill cancer patients at palliative care unit in Japan: perspectives of patients]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/102-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Self-perceived burden (SPB) is a common problem in terminally ill cancer patients. SPB affects decision making such as life-sustaining treatments, choosing care facilities and communication between patients and the family at the end of life. However there are few studies clarifying SPB. The purpose of this study were to describe the experience of SPB in terminally ill cancer patients at palliative care unit in Japan, and to obtain what patients need medical staff to do to relieve SPB. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in five patients.</p>
<p>Two investigators were involved in answer interpretations to fully understand the meaning of participants' insight and reduce bias. Participants are all male in the age range of 63&ndash;73 and retired. The primary caregiver of them was their wife. SPB consists of six following categories &lsquo;physically burdening&rsquo; &lsquo;making the family worry&rsquo; &lsquo;making the family feel impotent&rsquo; &lsquo;venting on family&rsquo; &lsquo;affecting family roles&rsquo; and &lsquo;causing problems financially and in the human relations related with admission and death&rsquo;. Participants hoped that the medical staff cared them and their family, for instance managing symptoms, listening to the patients and their families, making the patients feel comfortable and being faithful to tasks of palliative care. As SPB is constructed from multi-dimensional aspects, it is crucial to assess the patients holistically including the relationship with their families, the patients' role in their families and the families themselves.</p>
<p>This study suggested that nurses should approach not only the patients but also their families, and evaluate the care and attitude continuously.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kishino, M., Miyashita, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.128</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.128</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Self-perceived burden to family in terminally ill cancer patients at palliative care unit in Japan: perspectives of patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative Care, Hospice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>103</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/103-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A critique of the NHS ADRT proforma]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/103-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>At St Joseph's Hospice the process of documenting advance decisions to refuse treatment (ADRTs) has been shaped by patient and practitioner experiences. To guide this process the proforma available from the ARDTNHS website (<A HREF="http://www.adrtnhs.co.uk">http://www.adrtnhs.co.uk</A>) has historically been used. We present a critique of this document, reflecting broader issues concerning how ADRTs are recorded.</p>
<p>In order for ADRTs to be valid and applicable in the UK they should specify both the refusals and the circumstances in which they come into effect. If these exact circumstances do not occur the ADRT does not hold the legal refusal status it otherwise would, although it still might be used to inform decision making. We contend that a clinician's judgment is usually required to determine whether the ADRT circumstances really apply at the moment of decision. Our view is that refusals, and the circumstances in which they apply, can only be properly understood in the context of information that gives rationale and &lsquo;balance&rsquo; to these decisions. In this way the intentions behind the ADRT can be used to interpret the refusals more accurately. This information (which might be found in a separate advance statement) is of such importance that it should be positioned ahead of the refusals in the same ADRT document. Examples will be used to illustrate these points. Successful ADRT documentation is not simple and requires balanced information.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin, J., Sallnow, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.129</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.129</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A critique of the NHS ADRT proforma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative Care, Hospice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>103</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/103-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ACP for dementia: a delphi study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/103-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this study is to gain a consensus among policy makers, healthcare professionals, people with dementia and family members about how best to discuss advance care planning (ACP) with people with dementia. This is being done through the use of the &lsquo;Delphi method&rsquo;. This involves rounds of questionnaires aiming to reach a consensus among participants. This is done by feeding back responses from the previous round and giving participants the opportunity to change their responses in light of group views and opinions. This is being done in order to create guidelines which have been produced with equal input from all parties who they will affect. This of particular importance as people with dementia often become marginalised in discussions of their future care. The &lsquo;Delphi method&rsquo; has been extensively used within education and nursing to shape policy but has not as yet been used to investigate or help form policy in the area of ACP.</p>
<p>We are presenting the results from the first round of this study which will demonstrate (1) current agreement/disagreement surrounding dementia and ACP, (2) current opinions about the relationship between disclosure of a dementia diagnosis and ACP, and (3) How the &lsquo;Delphi method&rsquo; can be used in the construction of policy which takes equal account of the opinions of all groups involved.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sinclair, J., Oyebode, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.130</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.130</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Memory disorders (neurology), Memory disorders (psychiatry)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ACP for dementia: a delphi study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dementia, Non Competent, Mental Capacity, Issues</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>103</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/103-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The efficacy of a teaching video program on postmortem care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/103-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Postmortem care is basic nursing skill, includes physical care of the body, patient's cultural background, family support, issuing death certificates based on government regulations, and communicating with funeral directors. However, the hospice team has been the only treatment group that takes postmortem care seriously. The goal of this research is to develop a guideline and a teaching video of postmortem care for nursing staff. The subjects are nurses after probation. First, we interviewed them about their perception of postmortem care. Second, we set up a guideline and a video on the topic of postmortem care. The participants took pre-test and post test for evaluation. The data were analyzed with SPSS 12.0. We included 69 nurses whose average work experience was 6.1 years. 73% of them hadn't taken courses about postmortem care at school. 25% believed that knowledge learning at school was unpractical. There are significant differences before and after the class in the intention of doing postmortem care (p=0.015), the importance of postmortem care (p=0.001), and the perception of postmortem care (p=0.001). The predictors that influence perception of postmortem care are: number of experiences in practicing postmortem care, work unit, and importance of postmortem care. Terminally ill patients usually end lives in the hospital. Postmortem care is basic nursing skill. We suggest that postmortem care should include in the training program for new staff in order to improve the quality of terminal care. The results also provide information to improve terminal care for administrator of nurse.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kao, P. Y., Hu, W. Y., Lo, H. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.131</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.131</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Nursing, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The efficacy of a teaching video program on postmortem care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Education [amp   ] Training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>104</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/104-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What do professionals experienced in delivering end-of-life care want to know about advance care planning (ACP)?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/104-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>West Midlands South HIEC ACP project aims to encourage the use of advance care planning (ACP) more widely by training and supporting a multidisciplinary group of health care professionals from local acute trusts, community services and hospices who provide care for patients at the end of life.</p>
<p>The project includes a study day focusing on definitions of ACP, ethical and legal implications, use of local documentation and communication skills training &ndash; exploring approaches to initiating ACP conversations with patients using role play with actors.</p>
<p>To date 40 professionals have received training with a further 40 scheduled for March and April 2011. Those attended included: palliative care and long term condition clinical nurse specialists, district nurses, care home staff, occupational therapists, physiotherapists and an elderly care physician.</p>
<p>At the start of the day all of the group are asked to write down three questions that they want to have answered. Questions have fallen into five main categories: ethical and legal aspects (34%), use of documentation (30%), when to do ACP (19%), how to have the conversation (11%) and other (6%).</p>
<p>Over the course of the day we ensure that all questions are addressed. All participants have been asked to complete an online questionnaire 3 months after the training to assess its effectiveness.</p>
<p>Using questions in this way has provided a focus for the course, helping to identify where knowledge gaps and potential barriers to ACP lie.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poultney, J., Munday, D., Maclaran, S., Martin, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.132</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.132</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other rehabilitative therapies, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What do professionals experienced in delivering end-of-life care want to know about advance care planning (ACP)?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Education [amp   ] Training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>104</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/104-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ACP: more than burial or cremation!]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/104-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Three care home educators worked across nine care homes in East, North and West Hertfordshire to provide an End of Life Care Education Programme to care homes.</p>
<p>496 staff took part in the education programme. (Isabel Hospice Project: 150 participants in 3 homes, Peace Hospice Project: 155 participants in 4 homes, Hospice of St Francis Project: 191 participants in 2 homes).</p>
<p>Each education programme although designed differently contained the same education content and themes as well as measuring the education activity and impact of that education:<l type="tab"><li><p> Clarification of advance care planning terminology and documentation.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Awareness of services and team working across organizations.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Identification of residents at the end of life.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Symptom control and assessment.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Communication skills.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Cultural care.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Manager support for the end of life ethos.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Support in policy writing.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The education programme resulted in:<l type="tab"><li><p> An increase in the skills, confidence and competence of care home staff with the advance care planning process.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Significant increase in the preferred place of care being achieved through the use of advance care planning with the residents.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>The three programmes focused on identifying, developing and sustaining the care home staff skills and confidence, thus enabling proactive advance care planning in the care home setting.</p>
<p>This demonstrated that a flexible, learner centred and systematic approach to education can make a difference.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loney, J., Willoughby, J., Miller, H., Russell, S., Loney, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.133</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.133</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ACP: more than burial or cremation!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Education [amp   ] Training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>104</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/104-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Communication towards the end-of-life: a novel way to enhance education]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/104-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Caring for patients and their family towards the end of life can be both a challenging and rewarding experience for all involved. Initiating a conversation about end of life care needs was practiced through a novel, exciting and unique education session, aimed at enhancing confidence in this area of care.</p>
<p>Four hospitals across metropolitan Melbourne are piloting an end of life care practice change project based on the Liverpool Care pathway. Education plays a vital role in achieving practice change and as such an actor was hired to help the participants think and act outside their comfort zones. Nurses representing each of the 4 hospitals were invited to practice how they would initiate a conversation with a patient as they enter the last days of their lives.</p>
<p>The role play gave participants a safe forum to practice strategies and to focus on responding to psychosocial distress including depression, anxiety, anger and denial. Benefits of the session included recognising non-verbal cues, using attentive body language, acknowledging feelings and being able to use silence comfortably. Participants felt that using this way to teach communication skills was useful and beneficial in learning ways and techniques of listening to what our patients and their carers need as they enter this phase of life.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saward, D., Spruyt, O., Cook, E., Pigott, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.134</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.134</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Communication towards the end-of-life: a novel way to enhance education]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Education [amp   ] Training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>104</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/104-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ACP is a national social movement - the effectiveness of life education programs for school children: a preliminary study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/104-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a national social movement. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the life educational program and to make recommendations related to its delivery. The subjects were 252 students between the ages of 7 and 13 from one elementary school in southern Taiwan. The objective of this education program is to introduce life-cycle concepts that would help the student learn coping skills for the painful events. The program lasted 40 min and was conducted as follows: (1) A brief introduction and rapport building (10 min); (2) Presentation of a Flash video which introduced the concept of the life-cycle experience (10 min); (3) An open discussion session (20 min). Discussion outlines consisted of: a) natural life processes b) dealing with grief and loss and c) healthy attitudes toward life-and-death. The results showed that the video could become a catalyst for student discussion of life-and-death issues.</p>
<sec><st>Some findings</st>
<p>Among the students who had relatives or friends who suffered from severe illnesses or had passed away; that 91% felt that they had no one to discuss their feelings with, and that 76% thought their loved one who died suffered in pain. 23% of all students had experienced the death of a pet and the grief they felt was in proportion to the pain their pet had endured while dying. The results of this study provided insights into the students' feeling and needs related to life and death issues and also pointed out that ACP's promotion should early evolve within the daily school experience.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lai, W. S., Yang, W. P., Shih, Y. L., Liu, H. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.135</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.135</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ACP is a national social movement - the effectiveness of life education programs for school children: a preliminary study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Education [amp   ] Training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>105</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/105-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What challenges do CNSs experience when facilitating advance care planning?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/105-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The findings of a qualitative descriptive study, which sort to gain insight into the challenges that Clinical Nurse Specialists experienced when facilitating advance care planning (ACP) will be presented.</p>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The study used semi-structured interviews, gathering data from purposeful sampling of 8 community palliative care CNSs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>The findings identified a number of themes, within which were driving and restraining factors in term of ACP facilitation. A characteristic of all of the themes was the need to balance a number of risks, this led to the development of the metaphor &lsquo;walking the tightrope&rsquo; to describe the nature of the challenges that the CNSs experienced. This main theme was broken down into three categories which all had a balance of tensions within them. These categories were: opening the discussion; ethical issues; and how the personal attributes of the CNS influence the process. Key challenges were; when and how to open the discussion without harming the patient; dealing with emotional and ethical challenges; working with generalist colleagues. Facilitating factors were: building a relationship with the patient; CNS experience; and working as part of a team.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Contribution to the evidence</st>
<p>This work adds to the evidence on ACPs and the experience of CNSs working in palliative care. Increased understanding of the driving and restraining factors can improve educational preparation, and ensure that organisational issues are addressed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boot, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.136</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.136</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Research and publication ethics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What challenges do CNSs experience when facilitating advance care planning?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Education [amp   ] Training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>105</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/105-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Initial experience of training in palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/105-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Until the present day the majority of medical schools continue to train students to make great diagnoses and save lives. But the reality remains that we must take care, much more than heal. Improve as much as possible the quality of life for patients until they die, instead of trying to save them at any cost. On January 14 last year, the Institute of Medicine Professor Fernando Figueira began its activities in the palliative care ward. In little over a month, we received 16 medical students of the Faculty of Health Pernambuco. They remain on the ward for 2 weeks. During this period, they have contact with patients with advanced cancer and learn how to treat pain and other symptoms, in addition to communication skills in situations of risk.</p>
<p>Working in interdisciplinary teams is also experienced. Upon being asked to give feedback to the end of this stage mandatory, the majority reported that despite feeling anxious at dealing with the proximity of death, they thought they had learned important skills to alleviate the suffering of people and especially the real meaning of care palliative are. That cannot heal; it is not the same thing cannot do anything. And that having an incurable disease that does not mean you will die soon after knowing this. Therefore, realized the importance of caring for these patients throughout the time they need.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebelo, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.137</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.137</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Stroke, Hospice, Undergraduate]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Initial experience of training in palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Education [amp   ] Training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>105</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/105-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using end-of-life care profiles to support advance care planning]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/105-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In 2010, Liverpool PCT pioneered a care profiles approach to commissioning End of Life (EoL) services. This enabled comprehensive service requirements to be set in respect of skill mix, delivery, quality and outcomes for each stage of the EoL pathway.</p>
<p>The project involved a series of action learning-related workshops, each targeting one EoL stage. Consensus was developed among participants with commissioning, provider and service user interests, with outputs evaluated by an external reference group. A number of innovations were introduced, and it was concluded that the basic service requirements for EoL care are the same irrespective of the related disease.</p>
<p>The project was a success, with its recommendations used to commission EoL services across Liverpool. Care profiles are simple and flexible, and complement and augment integrated care pathways. They can support GP commissioning by providing clinically relevant and detailed information to specify and cost services.</p>
<p>Commissioned EoL services will vary between PCTs, to reflect local geography, history, service models and resources. Therefore care profiles serve to clarify exactly what services are available locally. Summary information extracted from the care profiles, would be appropriately tailored and presented, and made available across all professionals and providers to ensure patients and carers receive consistent, detailed information irrespective of which discipline happens to lead on their advanced care planning.</p>
<p>It follows that EoL care profiles can be used to support advanced care planning, by assuring the range, quality and consistency of information given to patients and carers, with any potential choices highlighted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gandy, R., Roe, B., Rogers, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.138</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.138</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using end-of-life care profiles to support advance care planning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Policy [amp   ] Implementation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>105</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The question of public support for assisted suicide or euthanasia in Canada]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In 1972, the Canadian Criminal Code was revised so that suicide was no longer a punishable offense, but assisted suicide and euthanasia identified as punishable by law. Developments since then have lead to the question of whether or not the public is supportive of legalization. Few public surveys have been conducted in Canada or other countries. The University of Alberta's Population Research Laboratory was asked to add questions to their annual telephone survey. This survey is carefully conducted for results highly (95%) representative of persons aged 18+. In May&ndash;July 2010, 1203 Albertans were surveyed as expected. Data were obtained and descriptive-comparative tests completed. Amazingly, 77.3% of all responders said yes to the question: Should dying adults be able to get help from others to end their life early? Specifically: 36.8% said yes, every competent adult should have this right; 40.6% said yes, but it should be allowed only in certain cases or situations, 22.7% said no, and 6.2% gave no answer. Albertans did not differ in their support for hastened death by past experience caring for a dying person, having had a friend/family member pass away, where they lived, gender, marital status, income, ethnicity and voting preferences. Four sub-groups were not as supportive (although 50%+ were still in support): religious people, older adults, those without high school completion, and those without a living will. Albertans are surprisingly open to hastened death, with this information needing to be taken into consideration for future developments in advanced care planning and end-of-life care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson, D., Cohen, J., Mohankumar, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.139</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.139</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Suicide (psychiatry), Assisted dying, End of life decisions (ethics), Suicide (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The question of public support for assisted suicide or euthanasia in Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Policy [amp   ] Implementation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>106</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predicting deaths - estimating the proportion of deaths that are 'unexpected']]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>A key workstream within the National End of Life Care Strategy is the identification by health professionals of individuals who are in the last year of life so that they can be offered Advanced Care Planning<sup>1</sup>. End of Life Care Registers are being developed to support this by holding information on these patients. This information will be readily available to health and social care professionals who may be involved in planned or emergency care for these individuals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>There is conflicting information on the proportion of the population for whom this may be possible. This paper summarises data from a number of sources to try to estimate the proportion of registered deaths which may be unpredictable and therefore unlikely to be included on an End of Life Care Register.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Appropriate data was extracted and analysed from four key sources. The sources were critically appraised and a proportion of unexpected deaths was ascertained.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Approximately 25% of all deaths in England and Wales can be assumed to be unexpected deaths.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This finding adds to what is already known as it should assist in service planning when considering the development and implementation of End of Life Care registers and associated service provision as it can be assumed that 75% of all deaths in England and Wales are predictable to some extent and suitable for inclusion on End of Life Care registers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackmore, S., Verne, J., Pring, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.140</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.140</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predicting deaths - estimating the proportion of deaths that are 'unexpected']]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Policy [amp   ] Implementation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>106</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Geographical variation in Hospital Mortality - does where you live determine how you die?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study investigates geographical variation in underlying causes of death (CoD) for people that die in hospital. Our cohort includes deaths in England 2004&ndash;2008 where death occurred during an admission of &le;30 days. Approximately 60% of all deaths occur in hospital, 45% die in hospital during an admission of &le;30 days. We analysed variation by CoD and Local Authority (LA) of residence.</p>
<p>Previous studies 1 &amp; 2 indicate that individuals near the end of their life have increasing need of hospital services. Our study links Office of National Statistics (ONS) mortality data to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) admission data. The ONS and HES linkage provides a longitudinal view of the hospital services received in the month before death and provides accurate CoD information not available in HES.</p>
<p>Examples of the LA variation in proportions of deaths occurring in hospital in the last month of life include; Cancer (18&ndash;68%), Cardiovascular (20&ndash;47%), Stroke (25&ndash;67%) and Respiratory (26&ndash;67%). By identifying and investigating variation in; Cancer, Stroke, Cardiovascular and Respiratory deaths, this study will inform policy and planning decisions concerning the nature of patients needs in their final month of life.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lyons, P., Verne, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.141</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.141</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Stroke]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Geographical variation in Hospital Mortality - does where you live determine how you die?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Policy [amp   ] Implementation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>106</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mortality and hospital admissions in the month before death]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lyons, P., Verne, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.142</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.142</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mortality and hospital admissions in the month before death]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Policy [amp   ] Implementation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>106</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-e?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['I know I should, but I haven't': advance care directive decision-making by baby boomers in South Australia]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/106-e?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To describe the results of a grounded theory study on what influences advance directive decision-making by Baby Boomers in South Australia</p>
<p>As longevity increases and chronic illness becomes the leading cause of death, the demands boomers will make on healthcare is of paramount importance to governments around the world. The literature speculates about these demands, yet there is little evidence to guide policy makers, academics and others interested in advance care planning. By understanding boomer use of advance directives, evidence can be provided of healthcare lifestyles important to this generation. Thus, a grounded theory study of seven South Australians aged 43&ndash;61 years was undertaken to identify the factors that influenced these boomers' advance directive decision-making. In analysis of the data, elements of their decision-making reflected critical areas of concern similar to those cited by persons already engaged in advance directive or advance care planning through terminal illness or frail age. The difference for participants in this study was that they were still &lsquo;young&rsquo;, in good health and had experienced the healthcare environment through relationships with others. These experiences presented a process of contemplation for developing a long-term plan for future healthcare needs. Contemplation was found to be a significant element of the decision-making process for the participants, which evolved as additional social and psychological influences impacted on them &ndash; ultimately leading them to create, reject or further contemplate their own advance directives.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bradley, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.143</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.143</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Child health, Infant health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['I know I should, but I haven't': advance care directive decision-making by baby boomers in South Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Specific Patient Groups Including Children</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>107</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/107-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Creating interest in ACP in a health group setting]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/107-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In 2009 Barwon Health's Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) team commenced promoting the opportunity of Advanced Care Planning (ACP) to clients in our 12 week group programs. Prior to 2009, ACP information was provided to clients individually when time permitted.</p>
<p>The team was interested in exploring if this new approach led to a greater willingness to engage in discussion about ACP.</p>
<p>Midway into a program the Cardiac Nurse provides a leaflet and information about ACP to all participants and partners. In the following weeks the Social Worker speaks to each client about his/her interest or questions. The discussions can then continue with Social Worker, client and family and any existing legal documents the client has are checked.</p>
<p>There has been a marked increase both in information clients received about ACP and follow-up discussions. 51 of 99 clients and partners discussed ACP with the Social Worker and 37 plans completed with a high client satisfaction rate.</p>
<p>This approach is innovative because the ACP information is initially offered with health related information when clients are relaxed within the group, familiar with the team and have an increased understanding of their heart condition. The process is connected with their weekly program attendance and moves at the client's pace. It is acceptable to clients, timely and leads to greater willingness to engage in the ACP process. We believe the approach can be used for many health group programs and has the potential to increase the participation in ACP within the community health population.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denson, J., McKinnon, A., Scammell, S., Dickins, C., Meehan, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.144</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.144</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Drugs: cardiovascular system]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Creating interest in ACP in a health group setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Specific Patient Groups Including Children</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>107</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/107-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Self determination - not for everyone]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/107-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The north coast area of NSW in Australia has a high aboriginal population. Unfortunately aboriginal people overall have a lower life expectancy and a high incidence of chronic disease. Advance care planning is therefore important for this group of people but can be very difficult when subjects such as death, prognosis and not for resuscitation are not readily discussed. Self determination around end of life care planning is also not seen as a priority for many Aboriginal people.</p>
<p>This talk will explore the approaches used in the advance care planning process in various services that cater specifically for aboriginal people on the north coast of NSW. Approaches that may appear paternalistic to mainstream Australian society will be discussed as well as other methods and tools that shown to be effective.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Binskin, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.145</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.145</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Self determination - not for everyone]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Specific Patient Groups Including Children</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>107</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/107-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introducing advance care planning in patients with advanced COPD]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/107-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Advance care planning has become government policy in Scotland and England, and many health professionals are being trained to do it for all patients with advanced life-limiting disease. However there is little evidence of its feasibility and effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To design and introduce for all patients with advanced COPD who attend an out-patient clinic an intervention that facilitates ACP, and to evaluate the feasibility and utility of this innovation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>piloting of the implementation of structured ACP we introduced an aide memoire (to facilitate ACP) and structured recording sheet into the out-patient clinic for patients with advanced COPD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>We introduced structured ACP into routine out-patient practice and the use of an aide memoire was positively received by health professionals working in the clinic. However ACP conversations were rarely initiated, despite the ACP prompts, unless first raised by the patients themselves. Patients with advanced COPD focused on planning to remain well and rarely had considered end of life planning. In those patients in whom ACP was facilitated hospital admission and interventions such as ventilation were perceived to be to be acceptable particularly when patients had previous experience. Most patients perceived that their eolc would be delivered in hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Facilitated ACP proved less useful for initiating conversation for patients with advanced COPD in an out-patient clinic. Patients with advanced COPD rarely consider eolc planning preferring instead to focus on living with and managing their illness and this may prove to be a significant barrier to the facilitation of ACP.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sives, D., McKeown, A., Raeside, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.146</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.146</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introducing advance care planning in patients with advanced COPD]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Specific Patient Groups Including Children</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>107</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/107-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Decision-making process of executing advance directives among Taiwan cancer patients in the advanced stage]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/107-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In 2000, Taiwan became the first country in Asia to enact legislation relating to the controversial topic of natural death. Unfortunately, the timing for clinical patients to execute ADs in Taiwan is clearly at the point when the patient are near death and, in these cases, ADs are primarily signed by family members. The purpose of this study was to present how the cancer patients in the advanced stage made their decision whether or not to execute advance directives (ADs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The study used longitudinal, qualitative method, applying the ethnographic decision tree modelling approach. The data collected from participation observation and in-depth interviews with 10 cancer patients to establish the model outlining their decision whether or not to execute ADs. Credibility, transferability, consistency and conformability were used to enhance trustworthiness and quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The outcomes of patient's decision were categorized into execute, not execute and delay. The study determined 6 decision characteristics (perceived and judged one's own health condition, endeavor, considering the family member, autonomy and self-determination, quality of life and quality of death, awareness ADs) and 12 decision criteria that Taiwanese cancer patients use when deciding about whether to or not to execute the ADs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Health providers should understand how patients decide whether or not to execute ADs so that the proper counselling and follow-up can be provided. The result of this study can help health providers understand the decision-making process of executing ADs among cancer patients, and hence develop advance care planning strategies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, C. L., Hu, W. Y., Lee, H. T. S., Chen, T. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.147</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.147</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Stroke]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Decision-making process of executing advance directives among Taiwan cancer patients in the advanced stage]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Specific Patient Groups Including Children</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>108</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/108-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ethical and moral dilemmas caring for people who are dying: why we need to plan in advance]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/108-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Health care professionals encounter ethical and moral dilemmas on a daily basis, particularly those caring for dying patients. A person facing death may be confronted with a myriad of issues, not only personal, physical and psycho-spiritual but also decisions regarding medical treatments. Included are: resuscitation, artificial hydration and provision of nutrition, place of death and whether to continue or cease active treatment. Never before in the history of mankind have we had so many decisions to make due to longer life expectancies, modern technology and medical advancements.</p>
<p>There is a growing awareness of the concept of Advanced Care Planning (ACP) in Australia This concept was developed to address decision making at the end of life with the aim of respecting choice, autonomy, preferences and personal values of the individual in future time of reduced capacity. ACP enables discussion of an individual's goals, needs and values in a non-crisis situation. ACP enables people to have time to consider (in the context of their current health) what would be an acceptable and what would be an unacceptable way to live life.</p>
<p>This poster is a visual depiction of frequently encountered difficulties and dilemmas in end of life decision making for he patient, family and health care professional. It highlights the advantages of Advanced Care Directives to ensure the patient's will and autonomy is respected. This poster will also depict some of the challenges, barriers and possible disadvantages of ACD.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sneesby, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.148</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.148</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics), Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ethical and moral dilemmas caring for people who are dying: why we need to plan in advance]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ethics, Philosophy [amp   ] Spirituality</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>108</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/108-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Opening electronically: raising spiritual awareness online]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/108-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A 1 day interactive course was developed to increase staff conifdence in their ability to recognise and meet spiritual and religious needs of patients and families, as part of a cancer network wide plan for spiritual support education following a network wide audit suggesting that health professionals felt undereducated in this area of assessment and support. NICE guidance (2004) suggests that staff should be able to assess the spiritual and religious needs of patients and either provide or make provision for their spiritual and religious care.</p>
<p>However releasing staff for education is becoming increasingly difficult and short courses may not provide sufficient time for reflection.</p>
<p>Collaboration between a university technology department and a cancer network resulted in the conversion of an interactive, face to face, spiritual awareness raising course of four sessions into an online course based on a social constructivist learning.</p>
<p>The poster shows how the various elements of the course were converted into online formats to meet all learning styles and preferences to promote group interaction, reflection and the development of a community of practice who could successfully reflect together.</p>
<p>The results of the analysis of the pilot course show how participants used the course to meet their needs and their qualitative evaluation of its value.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Groves, K., Baldry, C., Smith, B., Sumner, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.149</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.149</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Opening electronically: raising spiritual awareness online]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ethics, Philosophy [amp   ] Spirituality</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>108</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/108-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[State paternalism and individual autonomy in end-of-life care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/108-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>58% of people who die in England do so in hospital and yet surveys suggest that most people would like to die at home. There is evidence from many sources that the Quality of End of Life Care is variable and in some cases very poor. There is also mounting evidence of inequalities in quality of end of life care. The National End of Life Care Strategy (for England) aims to improve quality of End of Life Care. Tools in the armoury of a national strategy include vision, guidance documents and various forms of &lsquo;targets&rsquo; to encourage practitioners to change practice and for use in monitoring progress. End of Life is extremely personal and there is a question whether State Paternalism aimed at a general improvement in standards may inadvertently reduce individual autonomy. Importantly the question must be raised who decides what constitutes a &lsquo;good death&rsquo; and what happens if an individual's desires clash with the prevailing State view. Discussion will focus particularly on End of Life Registry and the use of Targets.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verne, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.150</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.150</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[State paternalism and individual autonomy in end-of-life care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ethics, Philosophy [amp   ] Spirituality</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>108</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/109-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advocacy of advance care planning by social ecological model in Taiwan]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/109-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The National Health Insurance in Taiwan started to reimburse for non-cancer diagnoses like congestive heart failure, COPD, end stage renal disease since 1st September 2009, the driving of advance care planning not only can encourage terminal patients to think about the meaning of life, but also help chronic illness patients to understand the mode of palliative care treatment at the early stage, so that we can improve the quality of care and the dignity of patients in final stage.</p>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>(1) To encourage public to think about the issues of live and death earlier through the driving of advance care of planning. (2) Palliative care can intervention every medical treatment in early stage, so we can efficiently improve and implement the quality of care for terminal patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>(1) This program is driven by the social ecological model. (2) Methods of implementation include:</p>
<p><l type="tab"><li><p> Design ACP promotion flyers for hospitals and public promotion activities.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Make an ACP advertisement and the official website of Hospice Foundation of Taiwan</p>
</li><li>
<p> To host the public promotion activities.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In 2010, the goals of this program are to make an advertisement, to design the promotion flyers for Advance Care Planning, and to host 41 public promotion activities for over 2400 people. To respect the medical autonomy of terminal patients and reduce the medical futility, we will not only hosting public promotion activities and clinical training courses, but also will drive this plan on related medical policy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Y. R., Wang, N., Wang, Y. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.151</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.151</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health policy, Drugs: cardiovascular system, Heart failure, Hospice, Quality improvement]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advocacy of advance care planning by social ecological model in Taiwan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Other</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>109</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/109-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advance Care Planning (ACP) within a palliative approach for residential aged care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/109-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In a unique collaboration between palliative care and aged care the Australian government produced Guidelines for a palliative approach in residential aged care, endorsed by the National Health &amp; Medical Research Council in 2006. Specific guidelines for Advance Care Planning (ACP) fit within the broader palliative approach with its emphasis on holistic assessment early in the course of life-threatening disease. Replacing ad hoc arrangements for offering end-of-life choices, the guidelines emphasise systematic implementation, regular education and ongoing assessment. The ACP component is clearly linked to many of the other 76 guidelines, demonstrating the role of ACP in the broader framework of goal setting and care planning.</p>
<p>Two brief, contrasting case studies exemplify the successful application of the guidelines for (a) a very physically frail, mentally alert older person and (b) a person with advanced dementia and other co-morbidities. Noting the families' reports and the endorsement of professional colleagues, aged care workers enjoyed pride and satisfaction from seeing the guidelines at work. The challenge remains, however, to ensure consistency in the application of the guidelines over a sustained period of time.</p>
<p>When advance care planning in care homes is based on endorsed guidelines drawn from the best available evidence, the end-of-life experience for older persons, families, and care staff can be transformed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hudson, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.152</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.152</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Memory disorders (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Memory disorders (psychiatry), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advance Care Planning (ACP) within a palliative approach for residential aged care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Other</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>109</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author index]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/1/111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000053.authorindex</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjspcare;bmjspcare-2011-000053.authorindex</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author index]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Author index</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>112</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[COMPASS - COMPlex interventions: Assessment, trialS and implementation of Services: Welcome to the COMPASS 2011 Annual Scientific Meeting (14-15 April 2011)]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murray, S., Higginson, I., Stark, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.editorial</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[COMPASS - COMPlex interventions: Assessment, trialS and implementation of Services: Welcome to the COMPASS 2011 Annual Scientific Meeting (14-15 April 2011)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A2-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Symptom management research in cancer patients: state of the art]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A2-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st>
<p>Both physical symptoms (eg, pain, fatigue, insomnia) and psychological symptoms (eg, depression, anxiety) are prevalent in all types and stages of cancer, from newly diagnosed patients to disease-free cancer survivors to individuals with recurrent or progressive disease. Also, patients often have multiple symptoms, so programmes that focus on single symptoms often fail to optimize treatment outcomes. Additionally, effective treatments include both medications and nonpharmacological interventions, so that administration of only one type of treatment likewise may fail to optimize therapy.</p>
<p>Key concepts in symptom management research derived from several practical clinical trials will be discussed, including:<l type="ord"><li><p>Management of patients with multiple as well as single symptoms;</p>
</li><li>
<p>Integrated approach to physical and psychological symptoms;</p>
</li><li>
<p>Measurement of outcomes relevant to symptom therapy;</p>
</li><li>
<p>Use of technology (eg, automated home-based symptom monitoring) to augment clinical care;</p>
</li><li>
<p>Adoption of a &lsquo;treat-to-target&rsquo; approach;</p>
</li><li>
<p>Decisions regarding medication versus nonpharmacological therapies;</p>
</li><li>
<p>Roles of different types of clinicians in cancer symptom care;</p>
</li><li>
<p>Focusing on specific cancers versus multiple types of cancer.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Finally, several promising areas for future research in the management of cancer-related symptoms will be highlighted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kroenke, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A2-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Sleep disorders (neurology), Sleep disorders, Sleep disorders (respiratory medicine)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Symptom management research in cancer patients: state of the art]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Keynote speakers</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A2-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence driven practice and rapid learning in supportive and palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A2-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st>
<p>Evidence-Based Medicine, more broadly termed &lsquo;evidence-based practice&rsquo;, is now recognised throughout medicine as routine approach to care, whereby research-derived evidence is incorporated into clinical decisions. Care is based on systematic and explicit appraisal, synthesis of information and integration of new information within the context of individual patient circumstances. Many of the barriers to evidence-based practice in palliative care are surmountable, provided they are critically considered and practical solutions developed. First and foremost, we must have evidence; generating evidence in palliative care is achievable.</p>
<p>Following on the heels of evidence generation is evidence implementation &ndash; the practical introduction of new information into clinical practice. Rapid learning is a model for systematic evidence development and implementation whereby the care of each individual patient is reinvested into linked continuously-accumulating databases so that the care of an individual person is informed by all people before her with similar circumstances, and lessons learned from her care are incorporated into aggregating knowledge of best practice for the future. Recent findings suggest that a rapid learning system for palliative and supportive care is feasible and acceptable to patients with advanced illness, helps monitor symptoms over time, facilitates study of the impact of novel interventions, and can identify unrecognised needs and concerns.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abernethy, A. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A2-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence driven practice and rapid learning in supportive and palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Keynote speakers</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A2-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2020 Vision: improving supportive and palliative care in the age of social media and global telecommunications]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A2-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st>
<p>In the second decade of the twenty-first century, social media are ushering a second wave in the evolution of the Web. Very rapidly, applications such as Google, Wikipedia, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter have risen to be among the most used sites on the Web, re-shaping how humans communicate, learn and live. Mobile communication devices are converging with Internet-based services, penetrating every region of the planet at a speed that dwarfs the growth in the adoption of personal computers or any other preceding technological innovation. These devices can now access hundreds of thousands of applications directly through the Internet, promising to satisfy almost any human need for information and communication.</p>
<p>The exponential pace of evolution of information and communication technology, however, is outpacing the ability of clinicians, researchers, managers and policy makers to keep up. As a generation with the rare privilege to witness the emergence of a new set of powerful technologies that could have a profound and widespread effect on society, we must look beyond the hype, and try our best to understand what works, what does not work and what could be harmful.</p>
<p>This session will give participants an opportunity to learn about emerging innovations in social media that could enable us to reduce unnecessary suffering. It will also underscore key methodological, political, cultural, technological and financial challenges that must be addressed urgently if we are to harness their power to improve the way in which we design, develop, provide, receive and evaluate supportive and palliative care services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jadad, A. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A2-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2020 Vision: improving supportive and palliative care in the age of social media and global telecommunications]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Keynote speakers</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A2-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Celebrating user involvement in research]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A2-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Background</st>
<p>This year the scientific committee has examined abstract submissions for evidence of User Involvement that is,<l type="tab"><li><p> Present from the early stages of the research cycle (eg, generating ideas, prioritising, study design).</p>
</li><li>
<p> Collaborative &ndash; working as co-researchers &ndash; not simply commenting on completed work.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Innovative &ndash; (eg, presenting to funding/ethics boards undertaking interviews, leading dissemination in some areas).</p>
</li><li>
<p> And has created a tangible output which has contributed to the conduct of the study (eg, protocol writing, higher recruitment, richer data).</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p><l type="ord"><li><p>To highlight and acknowledge those researchers who have demonstrated a high level of commitment to User Involvement in their work.</p>
</li><li>
<p>To emphasise the importance of collaborating with service users in research and to offer some insight into the future of User Involvement in SUPAC research.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Professor David Cameron, Clinical Director at the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre and former Director of NCRN, will reflect on the significance of User Involvement during his time at NCRN and offer some personal insight into how best SUPAC research might flourish. Following this talk, three shortlisted candidates for this year's User Involvement Award will take part in a short discussion about their work, following which a presentation will be made to the winner.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rainey, P., Morris, C., Kendall, M., Murray, S. A., Cameron, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A2-d</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Celebrating user involvement in research]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Celebrating user involvement in research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A3</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A3-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[COMPASS collaborative research Strand 1: assessment]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A3-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Strand 1 develops assessment and outcome measures for use and intervention in research and clinical practice. We set out to improve the patient assessment platform, to improve comparable measurement within and between studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Our process of meeting, rigorous collaborative discussion, guidance for researchers in training, grant application and dissemination has brought integration of service user involvement and collaboration among the different universities. We focused upon symptoms including psychological distress care giver burden and palliative outcomes. We evaluated measures from diagnosis to survivorship and end of life care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We have recently published about measures of psychological distress across cancer trajectories, clinical and psychometrics features of the General Health Questionnaire across the cancer trajectory, complex interventions for cancer survivors and assessment of care giver burden. In our collaborative's evolution, we continue to work on psychological distress assessment across cancers, characteristics of psychological distress, political challenges to supportive and palliative care research, cancer pain, palliative outcomes, short-form carer burden questionnaires, the selection of research assessment measures, telehealth with advanced symptoms, dignity-conserving interventions, place of death in non-cancer conditions and evaluation of services. Each of these can shape clinical research studies and services in supportive and palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our commitment, complementary insights, backgrounds and methodological expertise were essential and productive. We continue to collaborate, developing high impact research, infrastructure and training and wider collaborations across Europe and beyond (PRISMA in palliative care, ENCCA in young people with cancer) across disciplines and professions in supportive and cancer survivorship care, palliative and end of life care.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stark, D., Bennett, M., Johnson, B., Murray, S. A., Rainey, P., Rayner, L., Gao, W., Higginson, I. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A3-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pain (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[COMPASS collaborative research Strand 1: assessment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>COMPASS strands</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A3</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A3-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[COMPASS collaborative research Strand 2: The development and evaluation of complex interventions for psychological distress in cancer patients]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A3-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To provide the basis for the development of active components of complex interventions for distress and rigorous evaluation of process measures and patient outcomes. A staged co-ordinated approach was adopted, with collaborative members completing different components of the work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>To supplement COMPASS trials evaluating screening for distress and testing complex interventions for depression in cancer patients, preparatory work for an intervention for distress was undertaken. Systematic meta-review of the use and meaning of the terms &lsquo;psychological distress&rsquo; and &lsquo;psychological interventions&rsquo; were completed. A prospective study of the outcomes of moderate distress over time (n=326) and a qualitative study of patient's views on potential treatments for moderate psychological distress (n=25) was undertaken in Edinburgh. The views of hospital-based oncology professionals about the assessment and management of psychological distress were explored in an interview study across the Yorkshire Cancer Network.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Moderate distress is common in cancer patients and persistent in a substantial minority at 7 months (36%). Distressed patients prefer information and guidance provided by those who understand the effect of cancer but are reluctant to see mental health professionals. 23 cancer professionals were interviewed (8 oncologists, 4 surgeons, 6 clinical nurse specialists (CNS) and 5 nurses). The CNS was pivotal to the detection and management of distress and overall, effective management was not optimal due to a lack of referral guidance and limited access to specialist psychological care. These studies supplement ongoing work evaluating screening for distress and depression and the evaluation of intensive treatments for depression in cancer patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future research</st>
<p>Future research generated from the COMPASS collaboration includes development of a training programme to enable clinicians to use output from screening measures and self-help interventions for psychological distress incorporating e-health technology.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Velikova, G., Sharpe, M., Brown, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A3-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Screening (oncology), Screening (epidemiology), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[COMPASS collaborative research Strand 2: The development and evaluation of complex interventions for psychological distress in cancer patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>COMPASS strands</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A3</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A3-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[COMPASS collaborative research Strand 3: Research into practice: implementing a complex psychoeducational intervention to promote early presentation in older women with breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A3-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st>
<p>Women over 70 have poorer breast cancer survival than younger women, largely due to later stage at diagnosis. Promoting early presentation (PEP) in women attending for final round of breast screening may reduce stage cost-effectively, and is unlikely to lead to overdiagnosis. We tested the radiographer-delivered PEP Intervention to promote early presentation by increasing breast cancer awareness in a randomised controlled trial. Delivered in a positive, motivational way, the intervention aims to equip older women with the knowledge, motivation and skills to present promptly to primary care with breast symptoms.</p>
<p>In the trial, research radiographers delivered the intervention in a separate room after the mammogram, requiring considerable service reconfiguration. Training was intensive, and ongoing quality assurance involved performance feedback on videorecordings of interventions.</p>
<p>At 2 years, the PEP Intervention increased the proportion of women breast cancer aware compared with usual care four-fold. The NHS Breast Screening Programme has now commissioned its implementation in three breast screening services. Early piloting showed that reconfiguring the service as extensively as in the trial was not sustainable. The training deterred some radiographers, and storing videorecordings for ongoing quality assurance was not feasible.</p>
<p>We have, therefore, developed a shorter version of the PEP Intervention, delivered in the mammography room. Training is less intensive, and ongoing quality assurance will consist of direct observations and coaching as necessary. We will now measure feasibility of implementation and the effect on breast cancer awareness in routine practice. If implemented across the whole programme, the PEP Intervention has the potential to reduce avoidable deaths from delayed presentation in older women.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forbes, L. J. L., Ramirez, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A3-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), General practice / family medicine, Breast cancer, Screening (oncology), Radiology, Clinical diagnostic tests, Radiology (diagnostics), Screening (epidemiology), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[COMPASS collaborative research Strand 3: Research into practice: implementing a complex psychoeducational intervention to promote early presentation in older women with breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>COMPASS strands</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A4</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A4-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Resolving tensions: optimising the role of primary care in lung cancer follow-up care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A4-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>There is a little consensus on how to manage the supportive and palliative care needs of people with lung cancer once they have completed initial treatment. We aimed to gain insights into the perspectives of clinicians and service users as to how primary care could provide better care in collaboration with lung cancer specialists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a qualitative study encompassing (a) telephone interviews (84) with healthcare professionals from four UK healthcare authorities, recruited through primary care research networks and other professional contacts and working in primary, secondary and palliative care, and (b) focus groups (4) with lung cancer patients and carers recruited through the Roy Castle Foundation. Interviews and focus groups were digitally recorded, transcribed and entered into NVivo for thematic analysis, initially from different perspectives and then synthesised across the whole data set.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Lung cancer care is currently &lsquo;shared&rsquo; rather than &lsquo;integrated&rsquo; across heath care sectors. Debates about follow-up care tend to make a distinction between clinical care (provided in hospital by specialists) and supportive care (provided in the community by generalists) and there are contested ideas about where best to follow-up lung cancer patients who are relatively &lsquo;stable&rsquo;. Psycho-social support, support for carers and communication between primary and secondary care were identified as potential areas for development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Lung cancer follow-up care is characterised by a range of tensions which must be resolved if primary care is to play an optimum role in providing follow-up care and support for lung cancer patients and their carers.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Highet, G., Murray, S. A., Campbell, C., Kendall, M., Rainey, P., Neal, R., Rose, P., Anandan, C., Amoakwa, E., Weller, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A4-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Lung cancer (oncology), Hospice, Lung cancer (respiratory medicine)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Resolving tensions: optimising the role of primary care in lung cancer follow-up care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Primary care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A4</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A4-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A tool to assess lay cancer carers' changing needs in general practice]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A4-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction/aims</st>
<p>No General Practitioner (GP)-based tools exist for managing the multidimensional needs of lay carers of people with advanced cancer. This project aims to test a tool for carers to self-identify their needs, and manage them routinely with their GP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A Needs Assessment Tool for Carers (NAT:C) was tested in a randomised controlled trial. Intervention carers assessed their level of concern for 33 items spanning several domains of need, and identified a maximum of three to discuss at the consultation. Carers completed then discussed the NAT:C with their GP at baseline and 3 months, and their needs on both occasions were compared.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At November 2010, 54 carers had completed the NAT:C at baseline and 30 at 3 months. A mean of 14.1 (SD 6.4) concerns were identified at baseline, and 10.8 (SD 5.8) at 3 months. At the baseline consultation, a mean of three (median one) required immediate attention and 3.5 (SD 6.3) at a later time. At the 3 month consultation these decreased to 2.1 (median 0) immediate concerns and 1.1 (SD 2.7) for later attention. Caregiver fatigue, and anxiety about unexpected patient problems were the most common immediate concerns at baseline. Caregiver fatigue, planning for the unexpected and carers' own health needs were the most common at 3 months. Carers started to express a need to plan for the future.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Carers' focus of concern shifts from thinking about the patient's needs and onto their own needs and the future as the patient approaches death.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell, G. K., Girgis, A., Jiwa, M., Sibbritt, D., Burridge, L. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A4-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), General practice / family medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A tool to assess lay cancer carers' changing needs in general practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Primary care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A4</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A4-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Co-ordination of generalist end of life care in the UK: a multi-site ethnographic study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A4-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Appropriate, effective and timely generalist care for patients and their families towards the end of life is recognised as an essential component of high quality, equitable care. Improving coordination of care is one of the core objectives of the UK Department of Health End of Life Care Strategy. We aimed to identify the contextual complexities and challenges to well co-ordinated care delivery for people towards the end of life in different generalist settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>We used organisational ethnography among staff who were not specialist palliative care providers in three locations; an acute receiving unit, a respiratory outpatient clinic, and a primary care practice. The protocol included sustained interactions with health providers and interviews with patients and their carers over 9 months. The integrated datasets offer an understanding of how end-of-life care co-ordination is understood, initiated and conducted within patient trajectories and in the context of everyday healthcare provision.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The patient-centred, long term focus of primary care drives individual and team activity and requires flexibility and collaboration. In the secondary care short-term, acute setting, role boundaries and a clearly defined process, in which time constraints are paramount, may result in a less personalised experience for patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Coordination of care for patients and their families with advanced progressive diseases undergoing emergency admissions or transition across settings is important. The level of coordination and the systems in place influences people's experience of coordination of generalist settings. Further research regarding how collaboration influences coordination of care is required.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mason, B. L., Barclay, S., Dale, J., Daveson, B., Donaldson, A., Epiphaniou, E., Harding, R., Higginson, I. J., Kendall, M., Munday, D., Nanton, V., Shipman, C., Murray, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A4-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Co-ordination of generalist end of life care in the UK: a multi-site ethnographic study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Primary care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A5</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A5-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[National snapshot study of end of life care in the community for cancer and non-cancer patients]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A5-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Primary care provision of end-of-life care is crucial in achieving high quality care and reducing hospitalisation. The 2009 National Primary Care Snapshot Audit in End-of-Life Care provided the largest assessment of community provision, revealing key areas for further improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To realistically assess current provision and explore differences between cancer and non-cancer patients, those on the palliative care register, and other factors leading to quality end-of-life care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>502 General Practitioner practices in 15 PCTs (60% uptake ) submitted data from 4500 patients for every death over a 2 month period. The GSF After Death Analysis Audit Tool providing outcome data for individual patients, and compared with recommended best practice standards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Only 27% of patients who died were included on the palliative care register, of these 23% were non-cancer, 17%unknown and 69% cancer, compared with 26% patient deaths from cancer. Those on the register were more likely to receive well coordinated care but 42% were considered unpredictable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This snapshot provides an objective overview of current community end-of-life care, demonstrating key areas for further improvement. Patients on the register received more proactive, better coordinated care than those not on the register, and cancer patients were well represented on the registers and more likely to receive good end-of-life care, in contrast to non-cancer patients. Only a quarter of all patients who died were on the register, suggesting a need for earlier recognition and better coordination of care, particularly for non-cancer patients.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas, K., Clifford, C. M., de Silva, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A5-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[National snapshot study of end of life care in the community for cancer and non-cancer patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Primary care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A5</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A5-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of guidelines for oncologists to manage emotional distress in cancer patients]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A5-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Emotional distress (ED) is a significant unmet need experienced by up to a third of cancer patients. Many oncologists are reluctant to broach these issues perhaps due to (i) lack of awareness of referral pathways and (ii) a perception that it may increase the length of the consultation length. We propose that a clearly defined referral pathway to services and interventions to manage ED would help to overcome these barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To develop brief, accessible, evidence based guidelines for oncologists outlining local interventions and services to support the management of distress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Guidelines were developed using the National Institute of Clinical Excellence stepped psychosocial care and support model. This constituted a consensus based iterative approach involving:<l type="tab"><li><p> literature review</p>
</li><li>
<p> local information gathering on services</p>
</li><li>
<p> consultation with both professionals and patient groups.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Evidence based guidelines have been produced which reflect the range of interventions and services available and provide oncologists with clear pathways for management of ED. They and are now being disseminated for independent review and the resulting feedback will be incorporated to make further improvements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>It has been possible to incorporate the views of professionals, service users and existing information services within the guidance. The efficacy of the guidelines will be evaluated via an audit of referrals to services, consultation analysis, assessment of patient centeredness and completion of outcome measures.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holch, P., Velikova, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A5-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of guidelines for oncologists to manage emotional distress in cancer patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Symptoms</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A5</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A5-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A novel intervention for post-treatment oxaliplatin chemotherapy-induced neuropathy]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A5-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction/aims</st>
<p>Oxaliplatin chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (OxCIPN) is a common post-treatment toxicity. Many patients are left with long-term pain and disability. Available systemic agents have limited efficacy, cause significant side-effects and take several weeks/months to work. Colleagues' preclinical work showed analgesic effects of topical transient receptor potential melastatin receptor activators in neuropathic pain. We therefore conducted a proof-of-concept study using menthol in patients with OxCIPN.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>21 patients a median of 19 months post-treatment (range 3&ndash;35) applied 1% topical menthol, twice daily to affected areas and skin overlying corresponding dorsal root ganglia. At baseline, 2 and 6 weeks, patients completed: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and underwent objective assessments of gait (electronic walkway), hand dexterity (peg-board) and Quantitative Sensory Testing. Analysis: Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Pearson product-moment correlation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Between baseline and 6 weeks, total BPI scores decreased (median 3.6 (range 1.1&ndash;7.9) versus 0.7 (0&ndash;8.3), p=0.002). 83% described less pain and 52% had &le;30% BPI decrease (deemed clinically significant). There were corresponding improvements in mood (r=0.442, p=0.045), walking velocity (r=-0.797, p=0.026) and cadence (r=-0.823, p=0.012) and trends for improved hand dexterity (r=0.487, p=0.065) and mechanical pain thresholds (r=0.447, p=0.072). Four patients discontinued treatment after 2 weeks: two had difficulty applying the cream, two described worse pain. BPI changes were predicted by pre-treatment mechanical detection thresholds (r=0.534, p=0.027).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Topical menthol appeared to improve OxCIPN pain and physical function. It also seems to be well tolerated, have minimal side-effects, works relatively quickly and warrants further study.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Storey, D. J., Colvin, L. A., Boyle, D., Fallon, M. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A5-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neuromuscular disease, Pain (neurology), Peripheral nerve disease, Chemotherapy, Pain (palliative care), Pain (anaesthesia), Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A novel intervention for post-treatment oxaliplatin chemotherapy-induced neuropathy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Symptoms</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A6</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A6-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Community pharmacists' contribution to the management of cancer pain in the community]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A6-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To explore community pharmacists' role in educating and advising cancer patients and their carers on optimum use of opioids for pain relief.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews with a maximum diversity sample of 25 community pharmacists in three areas of England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Pharmacists had no reliable method to identify a patient with cancer, had few face to face contacts with patients and no means of accessing relevant medical information. Patients' medicines were often collected by carers or delivered to their homes, and reliable access to palliative care medicines remains problematic. Pharmacists reported that a wide range of issues are raised with them by carers but these rarely included questions about opioid medicines. For some pharmacists, proactive involvement appeared to be inhibited by fear of discussing emotional and wider social aspects. Many pharmacists assumed information had already been provided by another clinician and felt isolated from other members of the care team. Medicines Use Reviews for cancer patients regarding their analgesia were rarely undertaken.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Community pharmacists felt that their potential contribution to cancer pain management is constrained but they aspired to do more. Since they generally did not know which patients have cancer their provision of information and advice was ad hoc. There was little evidence of routine communication about patient care in relation to analgesia either from or to pharmacists. People with cancer and their families may currently have less access to information and support from community pharmacists than people with other conditions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Savage, I., Blenkinsopp, A., Bennett, M. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A6-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, Pain (neurology), Hospice, Pain (palliative care), Pain (anaesthesia)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Community pharmacists' contribution to the management of cancer pain in the community]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Symptoms</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A6</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A6-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring symptoms at the end of life using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A6-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) has been validated for patient-completed, caregiver-assisted and caregiver-rated scoring of patients' symptoms, enabling symptom recording to continue as patients deteriorate. However, it has not been used to assess symptoms at the end of life specifically. We aimed to assess the utility of ESAS in scoring symptoms in the dying patient.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>70 patients were recruited; 40 before and 30 following the introduction of a simple end-of-life (EOL) care tool. Nursing staff were asked to complete 12 hourly ESAS scores from the time the &lsquo;diagnosis of dying&rsquo; was made until death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>249 of a required 418 (59%) ESAS were completed in the pre- and 140 of 302 (46%) in the post-implementation group. 29/40 (72%) and 25/30 (83%) patients had an ESAS completed in the last 24 h in pre- and post- groups respectively. Comparison of scores for EOL symptoms before and after the introduction of the tool showed less symptom burden in the group where the tool was used. The differences in scores with 95% CIs (0&ndash;100 scales) were: pain 12.4 (&ndash;2.3 to 27.1); shortness of breath 11.7 (&ndash;6.2 to 29.6); anxiety 7.3 (&ndash;7.8 to 22.5); nausea 5.9 (&ndash;2.6 to 14.5) and secretions 12.3 (&ndash;6.7 to 31.3).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The amount of missing data suggests 12-hourly ESAS scoring was onerous for ward staff and would not therefore capture longitudinal symptom changes. However, ESAS was useful for assessing symptoms in the last 24 h of life, enabling comparison between the two groups.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forbes, K., Gibbins, J., Burcombe, M. E., Bloor, S. J., Reid, C. M., McCoubrie, R. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A6-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pain (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring symptoms at the end of life using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Symptoms</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A6</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A6-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The supportive care needs of the partners and family members of long-term survivors of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A6-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>There are an estimated 2 million cancer survivors in the UK today, with earlier diagnosis and improved treatments leading to an increasing number of long-term survivors. Partners and/or close family members are often a key source of support to the patient, and yet they themselves may experience significant levels of distress and have unmet needs. The main aim of this study was to describe the supportive care needs of the partners/ family members of patients who had survived breast, colorectal or prostate cancer for at least 5 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>This study was linked to a study of cancer survivors, recruited via cancer registries in the Thames Valley and North Yorkshire areas. Patients were asked to invite their partner or close family member to participate in a postal questionnaire. The questionnaire measured health status (EQ5D), levels of anxiety and depression (HADS), unmet needs (CASPUN) and positive outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>257 (78%) completed questionnaires were returned. Overall, levels of anxiety and depression were comparable with population norms. Accessible hospital parking (20%), information about familial risk (18%), managing fear of recurrence (16%) and co-ordination of care (14%) were the most cited unmet needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Most partners/family members of long term survivors report few ongoing issues. However, a minority do have high levels of anxiety and/or moderate or strong unmet needs. Strategies are required to identify and support those with needs, while allowing the majority to resume normal life beyond cancer.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watson, E. K., Turner, D., Adams, E., Boulton, M., Harrison, S., Khan, N., Rose, P., Ward, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A6-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Prostate cancer, Urological cancer, Urological surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The supportive care needs of the partners and family members of long-term survivors of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Early diagnosis [amp   ] supportive care needs</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A7</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A7-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The role of relationships in improving early diagnosis of prostate cancer]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A7-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Early diagnosis is critical in reducing mortality in prostate cancer. The extant literature identifies a range of variables which impact on when men present in primary care. For example, recent evidence suggests that men from high deprivation areas are significantly more likely to present with advanced disease and have lower survival rates. Psychosocial theories provide a framework for understanding patterns in the timing of diagnoses, for example, the role of social context and relationships in help-seeking behaviour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To identify how men account for the timing of their presentation and subsequent diagnosis with advanced disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Embedded mixed-method design involving a postal survey (N=320) and semi-structured interviews with a purposive sub-sample of men and partners (N=30). Analysis drew primarily on <sup>2</sup> and spearman's correlation, alongside framework analysis of the qualitative data, informed by Anderson's (1995) model of Total Patient Delay.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Data indicate that relationships and experiential knowledge play significant roles in gaining a diagnosis. Notably friends/relatives are key sources of information on prostate cancer and often prompt help-seeking behaviour. Indeed, men's perceptions of risk are not informed by clinical risk factors such as age and family history, but by their own and friends/relatives' experiential knowledge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Health promotion interventions should draw on relational theories, to be cognisant of the important role of relationships in help-seeking behaviour. Adopting a systemic approach has the potential to reach men at higher risk of prostate cancer and contribute to earlier diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forbat, L., Hubbard, G., Place, M., Boyd, K., Leung, H., Winslow, F., Kelly, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A7-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, General practice / family medicine, Prostate cancer, Urological cancer, Urological surgery, Health promotion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The role of relationships in improving early diagnosis of prostate cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Early diagnosis [amp   ] supportive care needs</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A7</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A7-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating a training package for health professionals and community workers to spread breast cancer awareness messages]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A7-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Delayed presentation in breast cancer leads to more advanced stage at diagnosis and ultimately poorer survival. Delays in presentation are associated with low breast cancer awareness.</p>
<p>Breast Cancer Care delivers the Train the Trainer: Breast Health Promotion programme to train people across England to deliver messages to increase breast cancer awareness: knowing how breasts normally look and feel and what breast changes to look for; encouraging regularly looking and feeling for breast changes; early symptomatic presentation and breast screening uptake. We measured trainees' knowledge and confidence to deliver these messages in a before and after observational design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We recruited 126 trainees attending nine courses over 6 months. Trainees included volunteers, community workers and health professionals. They completed the Cancer Research UK Breast Cancer Awareness Measure at baseline and 1 and 6 months after attending. We also collected information about recipients of the breast cancer awareness messages during the 6 months after training.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At baseline, 46% trainees identified five or more non-lump symptoms of breast cancer; 21% identified a 70-year-old woman as at higher risk of breast cancer than a 30 or 50 year old. 50% reported looking and feeling their breasts at least monthly. These proportions are higher than the general population (18%, 14% and 23% respectively).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Follow-up will finish in March 2011.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Breast cancer awareness at baseline was higher than in the general population. We will present 1-month follow-up data at the meeting. The findings will provide the rationale for future investment and improvements in the programme.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atkins, L., Forbes, L., Scanlon, K., Jupp, D., Carroll, L., Ramirez, A.-J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A7-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Breast cancer, Screening (oncology), Screening (epidemiology), Health promotion, Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating a training package for health professionals and community workers to spread breast cancer awareness messages]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Early diagnosis [amp   ] supportive care needs</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A7</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A7-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation and implementation of an intervention to promote early presentation]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A7-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Older women are more likely to delay presentation in breast cancer,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> which in turn contributes to poorer survival.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> We have developed a health professional-delivered intervention to promote early presentation in older women with breast symptoms (Promoting Early Presentation (PEP) Intervention) to be delivered when they attend for their final routine mammogram. We aimed to evaluate its efficacy in an randomized controlled trial (RCT) and adapt it for use in routine clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We randomised 867 women attending for their final round of screening on the NHS Breast Screening Programme to receive either the PEP Intervention delivered by a radiographer or usual care. We measured breast cancer awareness at baseline and 2 years post-randomisation. We are adapting and piloting the PEP Intervention to be suitable for adoption in routine practice across the NHS Breast Screening Programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the RCT, the PEP Intervention increased the proportion breast cancer aware at 2 years compared with usual care (21% vs 6%, OR: 8.1, 95% CI: 2.7 to 25.0). We have adapted the intervention so that it can be delivered feasibly while maintaining consistent quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We have demonstrated the efficacy of the PEP Intervention in an RCT. We plan to evaluate its effectiveness in routine practice by implementing it in three breast screening services, and measuring feasibility, costs and health outcomes (comparing these with health outcomes in control services). Our findings will provide the data needed to inform possible implementation across the entire NHS Breast Screening Programme.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forster, A. S., Forbes, L. J. L., Atkins, L., Patnick, J., Sellars, S., Tucker, L., Baxter, R., Ramirez, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A7-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Breast cancer, Screening (oncology), Radiology, Clinical diagnostic tests, Radiology (diagnostics), Screening (epidemiology), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation and implementation of an intervention to promote early presentation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Early diagnosis [amp   ] supportive care needs</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A8</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A8-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying patients with chronic heart failure who may benefit from palliative care: a comparison of the Gold Standards Framework with a clinical prognostic mode]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A8-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Heart failure has a worse survival rate than many cancers, yet few patients receive palliative care. The aim of this project was to evaluate the use of Gold Standards Framework (Seattle Heart Failure (SHF)) criteria and the SHF Model in patients with heart failure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Chronic heart failure patients, in NYHA class III or IV, who were being managed by a heart failure nursing service, were identified. The GSF criteria were assessed by interviewing the specialist nurse responsible for each patient's care. The SHF data were used to estimate mean life expectancy and predicted mortality at 1 year. Patients were followed up after 1 year, to evaluate; (1) all-cause mortality and (2) the sensitivity and specificity of the GSF and SHF to predict death at 1 year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>138 patients were identified through our search. GSF criteria identified 119/138 (86%) patients that met the minimum requirement for palliative care input. However, the SHF model predicted that only 6/138 patients (4.3%) had a predicted life expectancy of less than 1 year. At follow-up, 43/138 patients had died (31%). The sensitivity and specificity for the GSF and SHF model were 22%/83% and 98%/12% respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Neither the GSF nor the SHF accurately predicted which patients were in the last year of life. The implementation of palliative care in heart failure patients may require a shift away from the traditional &lsquo;end of life&rsquo; model used in cancer, and focus on the patient's increasing needs, understanding that death, itself, may remain unpredictable.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haga, K. K., Denvir, M. A., Reid, J., Ness, A., O'Donnell, M., Yellowlees, D., Murray, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A8-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Drugs: cardiovascular system, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying patients with chronic heart failure who may benefit from palliative care: a comparison of the Gold Standards Framework with a clinical prognostic mode]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Beyond cancer</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A8</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A8</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A8-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment burden in end stage heart failure (ESHF): a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A8-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Heart failure (HF) is as &lsquo;malignant&rsquo; as many common cancers. It is known that end stage heart failure (ESHF) symptoms have a negative impact on the daily lives of patients who also feel unsupported. The aim of this study is to examine patient experiences of managing their condition, with a particular focus on their &lsquo;treatment burden&rsquo;, defined as the &lsquo;work&rsquo; they do to manage their condition, including reference to the services they use and how they negotiate and mobilize these. It is essential to understand these issues if we are to be able to design more patient centred services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study involves semi-structured interviews with ESHF patients focusing on the work they do to manage and &lsquo;live&rsquo; with their condition. Qualitative data analysed using framework methods informed by Normalization Process Theory. Inclusion criteria: at least Grade 3 or 4 NYHA classification HF; who have ongoing symptoms despite optimal therapy; and have a history of admissions for this condition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>33 patients identified, 21 consenting to participation. 16 male; 5 female. Patients described a vast range of treatment burdens many which were secondary to the health care systems and the lack of a patient centred approach. Issues raised included: the work imposed by disorganised systems of care necessitating multiple attendances for check-ups and investigations; lack of continuity; inadequate communication between health professionals; polypharmacy; and difficulties accessing services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study has highlighted a range of challenges for patients posed by current health care systems, highlighting clear points for intervention.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mair, F. S., Browne, S., Morrison, D., Gallacher, K., Macleod, U., May, C. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.21</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A8-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health policy, Drugs: cardiovascular system]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment burden in end stage heart failure (ESHF): a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Beyond cancer</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A8</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A8</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A8-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The use of a modified 'surprise' question to identify and recruit dying patients into a research project]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A8-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>To improve end-of-life care we need good evidence. The challenges of carrying out research with patients who are dying are well documented yet this research is vital to determine whether new interventions improve care. We examined the feasibility of recruiting patients into a study examining their care as they died.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We performed a prospective mixed-methods observational study of the care given to patients who were dying. All patients on study wards were screened on admission using the question &lsquo;Is this patient so unwell you feel they could die on this admission?&rsquo; If the answer was &lsquo;yes&rsquo; the patient (and/or family) was approached to give prior consent to being included in the study &lsquo;should they become more unwell&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over 2 years, 6703 patients were screened; staff answered &lsquo;yes&rsquo; to the screening question for 327 patients (5%). Prior consent (23) or relative assent (94) was obtained for 117 (36%) of these patients. 70 died within the study. Overall, the screening question had a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 98%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>To our knowledge prior consent for research during the dying process has not been used before within an acute trust. While a large number of patients need to be screened, we have shown that a modified surprise question is helpful in identifying patients who will die during an admission, and it is feasible to gain consent from these patients, or assent from their relatives, for inclusion in a study to examine the dying process.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forbes, K., Gibbins, J., Burcombe, M. E., Bloor, S. J., Reid, C. M., McCoubrie, R. C., Kinzel, C., King, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A8-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Screening (epidemiology), End of life decisions (ethics), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The use of a modified 'surprise' question to identify and recruit dying patients into a research project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Beyond cancer</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A8</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A9</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A9-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Education in advanced disease: professionals' knowledge, attitudes and ability]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A9-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>The management of symptoms and lifestyle in advanced disease are essential for the maintenance of patients' quality of life. Health care professionals can facilitate patients to optimise disease management by providing appropriate education. While the provision of education by health professionals for patients with advanced cancer is reasonably well documented, less attention has been paid to other advancing progressive diseases. The aim of this review was to synthesise qualitative research which examined health care professionals' knowledge, attitudes and ability towards delivering educational interventions to patients with the following advanced progressive diseases: heart failure, chronic respiratory disease, end stage renal disease and neuromuscular disorders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The synthesis was conducted using meta-ethnography. Systematic searching of five electronic databases (CINAHL, Medline, PsychInfo, Web of Science Social Science Citation Index and EMBASE) occurred. Included papers were data extracted and assessed for quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The searches identified 911 records, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria for the review. Three key themes influencing the delivery of education to patients with advanced disease were identified:<l type="ord"><li><p>Capacity (to educate and aid decision-making)</p>
</li><li>
<p>Context (of educational delivery)</p>
</li><li>
<p>Timing (of education).</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A range of enablers and barriers identified by health care professionals influence their ability to deliver education at the end of life. Therefore, any interventions to change practice need to have multiple components, rather than targeting sole aspects such as knowledge or motivation alone. Strategies for improving educational practice should explicitly target factors judged as important and potentially amenable to change.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flemming, K., Closs, S. J., Foy, R., Bennett, M. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.23</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A9-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Drugs: cardiovascular system, Drugs: CNS (not psychiatric), Neuromuscular disease, Stroke, End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics), Internet]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Education in advanced disease: professionals' knowledge, attitudes and ability]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Beyond cancer</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A9</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A9-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fostering hope and enhancing end of life experiences: two Phase II RCTs of dignity therapy]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A9-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Maintaining dignity and having hope are important at the end of life. The aim of these studies is to assess the acceptability and potential effectiveness of Dignity Therapy to reduce psychological and spiritual distress in people (i) with advanced cancer, and (ii) living in care homes for older people.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We randomly allocated 45 cancer patients and 60 care home residents to an intervention (Dignity Therapy) or control group. We collected outcomes in face-to-face interviews at two post intervention follow-ups: 1 and 4 weeks for cancer patients; and 1 and 8 weeks for care home residents (equivalent in the control group). The primary outcome was dignity related distress. Secondary outcomes were: hopefulness; anxiety/depression; quality of life; and acceptability (views on the intervention/taking part in the study).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Cancer patients in the intervention group were more hopeful at both follow-ups. Effect sizes were large (partial <sup>2</sup> 0.195 and 0.150 respectively). Baseline levels of distress were low in both studies and the two groups did not differ on measures of distress or quality of life. Residents in both groups showed a decrease in dignity-related distress at 8 weeks. Participants in the intervention groups outperformed the control groups on all acceptability items at both follow-ups. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) ranged from 0.25 to 1.09).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Dignity Therapy increases hopefulness for people with advanced cancer and enhances their end of life experiences and those of residents of care homes. The impact of Dignity Therapy on more distressed patients needs to be determined.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hall, S., Goddard, C., Speck, P., Opio, D., Chochinov, H. M., Higginson, I. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.24</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A9-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Stroke, End of life decisions (palliative care), End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fostering hope and enhancing end of life experiences: two Phase II RCTs of dignity therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Interventions</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A9</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A9-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving breast and lung cancer services in hospital using experience based co-design (EBCD)]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A9-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Background and aims</st>
<p>This project sought to design better experiences for patients and health care staff from the breast and lung cancer services within two large teaching hospitals in England. Experience based co-design (EBCD) was the chosen action research approach.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> EBCD is a new and innovative methodology combining (1) a user-centred orientation (by adopting a narrative storytelling approach) and (2) a participatory, collaborative change process, allowing staff to &lsquo;see the person in the patient&rsquo; and placing patient and staff experience at the centre of service development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and results</st>
<p>The project involved an in-depth qualitative study of how care was delivered by staff and received by patients, focusing on patients' emotional &lsquo;journey&rsquo;. It included 36 filmed patient narratives, capturing the key emotional &lsquo;touch points&rsquo;, 60 staff interviews about their experience of providing services, and ethnographic observation of clinical areas. Patient and staff interviews were analysed to identify themes and issues for which were feedback to patients and staff at various group events. For example, a composite 30 min film of breast and lung cancer patients&rsquo; experiences, was created and used to feedback patient narratives to staff. Through a facilitated three-stage change process which will be described, patients and staff agreed on joint priorities for improvement and then worked together in co-design groups that focused on identified priority areas (for example information provision, day surgery, continuity of care, diagnosis and outpatient care).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion and conclusions</st>
<p>The paper reflects on lessons learned for improving patient/staff experiences through the use of EBCD. It explores the value of the EBCD approach, the use of narratives, observation and film (excerpts will be shown) as a way of humanising health care and engaging staff and patients in a change process to facilitate meaningful and lasting improvements in service provision.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wiseman, T., Tsianakas, V., Maben, J., Robert, G., Richardson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.25</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A9-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung cancer (oncology), Lung cancer (respiratory medicine), Surgical oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving breast and lung cancer services in hospital using experience based co-design (EBCD)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Interventions</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A10</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A10-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Moving Forward - Developing an information resource for breast cancer patients at the end of hospital based treatment]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A10-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Following completion of hospital based treatment breast cancer patients often feel isolated and abandoned and report a lack of information and support to address their recovery needs. Feedback from service users at Breast Cancer Care identified a need for a resource at the end of breast cancer treatment. In collaboration with our Service User Research Partnership (SURP) group we set about designing and delivering this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To develop a resource for breast cancer survivors based on their identified unmet information and support needs and user feedback.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A qualitative mixed method approach:</p>
<p>Phase 1:<l type="tab"><li><p> Two Focus groups with 12 women at the end of hospital based treatment.</p>
</li><li>
<p> Telephone interviews of 12 healthcare professionals.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Phase 2:<l type="tab"><li><p> Reconvened focus groups and email review of healthcare professionals to critique a prototype resource.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Resource content was informed by the conceptual framework developed from interview analysis which identified a process of reconciliation &ndash; &lsquo;reflection&rsquo;, &lsquo;isolation&rsquo;, &lsquo;loss of self&rsquo; and &lsquo;moving forward in life&rsquo;. Participants wanted a comprehensive resource that could be individually tailored and includes self management strategies Real-life experiences of patients, signposting to other resources and usefulness over time were also considered important.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This is the first information resource for breast cancer survivors in the UK. It has considerable potential to improve the experiences of many living with breast cancer. Further, it will assist healthcare professionals in the care of their patients at the transition from active treatment to survivorship. SURP involvement has strengthened the quality of the research.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scanlon, K., Reed, E., Wray, J., Fenlon, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.26</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A10-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Moving Forward - Developing an information resource for breast cancer patients at the end of hospital based treatment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Interventions</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A10</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A10-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introducing an electronic palliative care summary: patient, carer and professional perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A10-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>The electronic Palliative Care Summary (ePCS) is being introduced throughout Scotland to provide out of hours (OOH) staff with up to date records of medications, decisions regarding treatment and health status of patients requiring palliative care. Automatic twice-daily updates of information from General Practitioner (GP) records to a central electronic repository are available to OOH services. We sought to identify key issues related to the introduction of ePCS from primary care and OOH staff, to identify facilitators and barriers to its use, to explore the experiences of patients and carers, and to make recommendations for improvements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews were carried out with a purposive sample of GPs from practices using different computing software systems; out-of-hours GPs; and patients (and/or their carer) for whom an ePCS had been completed. Interviews were digitally recorded with consent, transcribed and analysed thematically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients and carers were reassured that OOH staff were informed about their current circumstances. OOH staff considered the ePCS allowed them to be better informed in decision&ndash;making and in carrying out home visits. GPs viewed the introduction of ePCSs to have benefits for in-hours structures of care such as advance care planning. No interviewee expressed concern about loss of confidentiality. Barriers raised related mainly to the introduction of a new technology including unfamiliarity with the process, limited time and IT skills.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The ePCS has the potential to improve patient care. Training in ePCS completion and updating should be available for all GPs and community nurses.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hall, S., Campbell, C., Kiehlman, P., Murchie, P., Murray, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.27</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A10-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients, General practice / family medicine, Hospice, Confidentiality, IT, Legal and forensic medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introducing an electronic palliative care summary: patient, carer and professional perspectives]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Interventions</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A10</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A10-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictors of non-remission of depression in a palliative care population]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A10-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Prospective studies of depression in palliative care are rare. Two studies which examine depression prospectively in patients with advanced disease have not looked at predictors of remission. This study aims to explore prospective predictors of non-remission of depression in palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study design comprised two data collections: with initial assessment on referral to a palliative care service in South London, UK and a 4-week follow-up. 76 participants met the criteria for &lsquo;any depressive syndrome&rsquo; at the time 1 assessment using the PRIME-MD, who also participated at time 2. The outcome measure was remission (N=39) or non-remission (N=37) of depression by time 2.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The findings showed that reporting low social support at time of referral was the most powerful risk factor for non-remission. There was also a strong association between improved physical symptoms, from time 1 to 2, and remission of depression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study in palliative care is the first of which we are aware to explore factors associated with non-remission of depression. Depressed patients identified with low social support on referral to palliative care might particularly benefit from additional psychosocial care in the treatment of their depression. This study provides evidence that effective physical symptom management in palliative care may be a valuable intervention for depressive symptoms.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goodwin, L., Lee, W., Price, A., Rayner, L., Monroe, B., Sykes, N., Hansford, P., Higginson, I. J., Hotopf, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.28</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A10-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Mood disorders (including depression)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictors of non-remission of depression in a palliative care population]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Psychological distress</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A11</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A11-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychological distress in cancer outpatients: a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A11-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Psychological distress is common in cancer patients. It can be viewed as a continuum from no symptoms at one end to psychiatric diagnoses such as major depression at the other. While major depression is likely to persist and to require treatment, there is much we need to know about patients with milder symptoms of distress. This study aimed to: (1) Describe the course of distress over 7 months in patients with clinically significant distress (HADS &le;15) at routine symptom monitoring but who did not meet criteria for major depression, (2) Determine whether demographic and clinical characteristics and severity and short-term persistence of initial distress predict significant distress at 7 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>326 patients with a relatively good prognosis (&gt;12 months) were recruited from two specialist NHS Cancer Centres in Scotland, UK. Patients completed the HADS at routine symptom monitoring on touch screen computers and at 1, 2, 4 and 7 months by telephone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Preliminary results showed that more than a third of patients (36%) had clinically significant distress at 7 months. The data is currently being analysed to look at the characteristics of patients with persistent distress at 7 months. These results will be presented at the conference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A substantial group of patients with significant distress at routine symptom monitoring, but who do not meet criteria for major depression, have distress that persists over 7 months. These patients might benefit from treatment for their symptoms and services should be developed for these patients.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kleiboer, A. M., Hansen, C. H., Walker, J., Sharpe, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A11-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Mood disorders (including depression)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychological distress in cancer outpatients: a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Psychological distress</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A11</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A11-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pain and depression in cancer patients: a longitudinal study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A11-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Although pain and depression co-exist in 36.5% of cancer patients, the precise nature of the relationship between these symptoms requires elucidation. This study aimed to further understanding of the relationship by determining whether improved pain is associated with a significant reduction in depression and increased quality of life in cancer patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A secondary data analysis of patients enrolled in pain intervention studies (n=123) was undertaken. Pain, depression and quality of life were measured at baseline and endpoint using the Brief Pain Index (BPI), Hospital and Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) and EuroQol Thermometer assessment tools respectively. The Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's Exact Test were used to statistically analyse score differences between pain response groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Baseline BPI, HADS and EuroQol scores were well matched between the groups. Patients responding to pain interventions had an average 2.95 point decrease in endpoint HADS scores, contrasting with a 0.89 increase in non-responding patients (score range 0&ndash;42). There was a statically significant difference in the endpoint total HADS scores between the two groups (p=0.0015). Similar mean changes in EuroQol scores revealed increased quality of life scores occurring in patients with (10.64) and without (12.41) improved pain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Improving pain results in reduced depression scores. This supports a unidirectional relationship between pain and depression. Further study is required to establish the presence of a bidirectional relationship. Understanding the relationship between pain and depression allows prioritisation of targeted management of co-existent pain and depression, which may improve the clinical care of cancer patients.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack, L., Scott, A., Colvin, L., Laird, B., Fallon, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A11-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Pain (neurology), Stroke]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pain and depression in cancer patients: a longitudinal study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Psychological distress</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A11</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A11-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying patients psychological needs in oncology consultations: an exploration of rates of discussion and patterns of referral]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A11-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Background</st>
<p>High levels of emotional distress are common in cancer patients but oncologists often report feeling ill-equipped to discuss these issues. Little information exists on the discussion of depression and anxiety within consultations and how further support is offered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The current study aims to determine the frequency of discussion of depression and anxiety within consultations and how often referrals and prescriptions are offered and made.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>28 oncologists and 286 cancer patients were recruited to a randomized controlled trial examining the effects of the regular collection and use of health-related quality-of-life data in oncology practice on process of care and patient well-being. Each patient was recorded at four consecutive consultations, which were then analysed using content analysis. Descriptive data relating to the discussion of depression and anxiety and the offer and uptake of referrals and prescriptions was then extracted using SPSS version 16.0.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Depression and anxiety was discussed with 17.5% of patients in at least one of the four consultations. Referrals were offered to 6.6% and made for 1.4% of patients.1.7% mentioned ongoing psychosocial care. Prescriptions were offered to 3.5% and made for 1.4% of patients. 4.9% mentioned ongoing psychotropic medications. 42% of patients who discussed depression or anxiety with their doctors were not offered any further support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Depression and anxiety are not routinely discussed in oncology consultations and if discussed; patients are not always offered further support. Oncologists could benefit from a clear pathway of how to manage distress and make patients aware of support available.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warrington, L., Velikova, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A11-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying patients psychological needs in oncology consultations: an exploration of rates of discussion and patterns of referral]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Abstract sessions: Psychological distress</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A11</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A11-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lung cancer survivorship: patients' and carers' views of after care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A11-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Evidence for the management of patients after treatment is limited and particularly so for patients with advanced cancer. There is little empirical evidence to establish best practice in the after care of lung cancer patients. The aim of this study was to develop an understanding of patients' and carers' views of their aftercare and to integrate these into a new intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A qualitative approach was taken using the principles of grounded theory. 35 interviews were conducted with patients and carers, participants had a range of histological diagnoses and stage of cancer and all treatment options were included in the sampling strategy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The period after treatment was highlighted as a difficult time for participants with anxiety and uncertainty after the &lsquo;treadmill&rsquo; of treatment. Follow-up appointments provided significant reassurance about the patients' condition, which participants felt was best assessed by x-ray. Despite often poor prognosis the focus was to &lsquo;get back to normal&rsquo; and live life to the full. Participants highlighted a lack of appropriate information after treatment, specific information about long term effects of treatment, symptoms and disease progression/recurrence. Transitions between teams were important concerns which led to worries about rapid access back to treatment/specialists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patient and carer preferences should be incorporated into the development of interventions; they have revealed important issues that impact on the day-to-day lives of people living with lung cancer, specifically, targeted information focusing on aftercare issues, care planning and identification of key contacts to manage care and transitions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calman, L., Beaver, K., Roberts, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A11-d</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung cancer (oncology), Lung cancer (respiratory medicine)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lung cancer survivorship: patients' and carers' views of after care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A12-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Widening participation in West Hertfordshire Hospices: enhancing access and diversity]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A12-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Hospices have an established goal to meet the needs of local communities. These communities are increasingly diverse and provide important sources of goodwill and financial support. However, previous research has indicated that negative perceptions may also be associated with hospices; with Christian values being promoted and death being the primary focus.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>The aims of this research were to help understand access issues to hospice services in West Hertfordshire and to identify barriers that may prevent marginal community groups, including the Gypsy Traveller community, from using these services. Actions were identified to help reduce access barriers in the future.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A mixed method design, including a literature review, was implemented and 44 individuals shared their views about hospice care. Data collection tools included semi structured interviews, focus groups and email surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Key findings confirmed existing negative attitudes towards hospice services. There was a perception that some professionals would not refer those who did not fit the &lsquo;typical&rsquo; patient profile (ie, limited prognosis and no cultural mismatch). Practical concerns included lack of appropriate food, caring practices and environment. This presentation will concentrate on the Gypsy Traveller community as exemplar case.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, H., Papadopoulos, I., Kelly, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A12-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Widening participation in West Hertfordshire Hospices: enhancing access and diversity]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A12-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A systematic review of complementary and Alternative medicine interventions in the management of cancer-related fatigue]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A12-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Fatigue, experienced by patients during and following cancer treatment, is a significant clinical problem. It is a prevalent and distressing symptom yet pharmacological interventions are used little<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> and confer limited benefit for patients.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> However, many cancer patients use some form of Complementary and Complementary medicine (CAM) and some evidence suggests it may relieve fatigue.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> A systematic review was conducted to appraise the effectiveness of CAM interventions in ameliorating cancer-related fatigue (CRF).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Systematic searches of biomedical, nursing and specialist CAM databases were conducted, including Medline, Embase and AMED (August 2010). Included papers described interventions classified as CAM by the National Centre of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and evaluated through randomised controlled trial (RCT) or quasi experimental design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>15 studies were eligible for the review, of which 12 were RCTs. Forms of CAM interventions examined included acupuncture, massage, yoga and relaxation training. Findings suggested acupuncture, medical qigong and restorative yoga are somewhat effective for reducing CRF, whereas vitamins, massage and hypnosis are not.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Acupuncture appeared to confer most benefit to patients. However, trials incorporated within the review varied greatly in quality; most were methodologically weak and at high risk of bias. Consequently, there is currently insufficient evidence to conclude with certainty the effectiveness or otherwise of CAM in reducing CRF. The design and methods employed in future trials of CAM should be more rigorous; increasing the strength of evidence should be a priority.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finnegan-John, J., Molassiotis, A., Richardson, A., Ream, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A12-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Complementary medicine, Physiotherapy, Sports and exercise medicine, Internet]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A systematic review of complementary and Alternative medicine interventions in the management of cancer-related fatigue]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A12-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing the clinical assessment of female sexual difficulties after pelvic radiotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A12-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Pelvic radiotherapy creates physical and psychological effects that impact negatively on the sexual well-being of women and their partners. The aim of this ethnographic study was to develop an assessment methodology to improve the clinical assessment of sexual morbidity following radiotherapy in women with pelvic malignancy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Observation of follow-up clinics (50 gynaecological, 19 colorectal consultations) plus interviews with women (n=24), partners (n=5) and health professionals (n=20) explored sexual morbidity assessment after treatment completion. Women with pelvic malignancy who had completed radical radiotherapy 3, 6, 12 and 24 months previously were included. Doctors, nurses and therapy radiographers were interviewed to establish professional perspectives on assessment. Observation and interview data were analysed using both SPSS v.14 and NVivo v.2 software.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Consultations focused on disease surveillance, specific aspects of toxicity monitoring and managing active symptoms. Sexual concerns were not routinely assessed in gynaecological (11/50) or colorectal (6/19) clinics. Health professionals felt inhibited discussing sexual concerns with older women and when partners were present. Patient and partner interviews revealed inconsistency in the management of treatment induced menopause, inadequate knowledge of sexual health resources and unidentified difficulties including loss of desire, dyspareunia and reduced sexual satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Traditional models of medical follow-up may not offer an appropriate clinical context for the optimal assessment and management of sexual concerns associated with pelvic radiotherapy. These findings are important for the development of survivorship services and can inform the training of health professionals engaged in post-treatment toxicity assessment, patient information and support.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[White, I. D., Allan, H., Faithfull, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A12-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Menopause (including HRT), Radiotherapy, Sexual and gender disorders, Radiology, Sexual health, Clinical diagnostic tests, Health promotion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing the clinical assessment of female sexual difficulties after pelvic radiotherapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A13</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A13-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How good is palliative care at following the MRC new guidance on complex interventions?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A13-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Improved and cost-effective palliative care services are required to advance care for patients, their families and society. Service developments are however, often ad hoc with limited evaluation and little research investment. MORECare (MRC/NIHR) is developing research methods to evaluate the effectiveness of such services <A HREF="http://www.csi.kcl.ac.uk/morecare.html">http://www.csi.kcl.ac.uk/morecare.html</A>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To systematically review the application of effectiveness research methods in evaluations on models of service delivery in palliative care To synthesis &lsquo;best practice&rsquo; and identify contentions or uncertain areas that require methodological debate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We drew on narrative synthesis to systematically search 6 electronic databases and the bibliographies of the included papers. We included systematic reviews on the effectiveness of palliative care services for patients and/or their families with advanced progressive malignant/non-malignant disease. The MRC New Guidance structured the data synthesis with quality assessment to examine robustness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>35 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. The findings indicate a disparate application of the MRC guidance. Prominent areas include debate on evaluating effectiveness (eg, outcome measurement), while less attention is given to intervention development and modelling, leading to a prominence of weak trial design. The implementation of evidence into clinical practice is the weakest area.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The MRC guidance is rarely used in its entirety. Application and development of some components is evident, but methodological discussions concern challenges to undertaking effectiveness research and the weaknesses of the research methods. Opportunities for innovation in trial design are apparent, particularly intervention development and modelling. Innovation in research methods is imperative to strengthen the evidence base.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evans, C. J., Higginson, I. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A13-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How good is palliative care at following the MRC new guidance on complex interventions?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A13</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A13-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perceptions of prostate cancer in black African and Caribbean men: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A13-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Prostate cancer (PC) is common and affects black African and Caribbean men disproportionally. Awareness of PC is low in these groups, but knowledge is lacking about other factors that may deter information seeking or getting tested for PC. The aim of the review was to appraise and synthesise research on knowledge and perceptions of PC among black men.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Four medical and social science databases were systematically searched and reference lists of relevant papers hand searched. Non-English publications were excluded. Qualitative findings were synthesised using comparative thematic analysis, to which quantitative findings were incorporated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>13 qualitative studies and 20 cross-sectional surveys were included. All except one were conducted in North-America. The analysis identified individual, cultural and social factors likely to impact on black men's awareness of, and willingness to be tested for, PC. Black men's awareness of personal risk of PC varied greatly between studies. Misunderstandings regarding methods of diagnosis and treatment were widespread. PC testing and treatment were perceived as threatening to men's sense of masculinity. Mistrust of the healthcare system, limited access to healthcare and lack of consistent, trusting relationships with health professionals were also prominent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These factors could contribute to late PC diagnosis and should be taken into account when planning PC services and communicating with black men who seek prostate care. Further, the review demonstrated a need for high quality studies in Europe to determine the relevance of the review findings for black European men.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pedersen, V. H., Armes, J., Ream, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A13-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Prostate cancer, Urological cancer, Urological surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perceptions of prostate cancer in black African and Caribbean men: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A13</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A13-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Formulations of living with cancer: a discursive analysis of nurse talk]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A13-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>This presentation is regarding a study of the ways in which living with cancer is being formulated by acute sector nurses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>More complete definitions of cancer survivorship are emerging as evidence accumulates regarding the subject. Yet, what living with cancer is and how it is being formulated by nurses has not been published.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The Discursive Action Model<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> provided the theoretical and methodological guide to examine the constructive and functional dimensions of verbal accounts of 20 health professionals, mainly acute sector nurses, gathered during three focus groups conducted in 2008/2009.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report health professional formulations of living with cancer in the UK. It illustrates the key discursive manoeuvres used by acute sector nurses to construct cancer as a long-term illness, which include the description of on-going physical and psychosocial effects, particularly fear and risk, of recurrence. Importantly, the rationale for locating on-going support in the acute versus community sector is constructed as derived from patient feedback, not from the acute-based staff themselves.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Implications for cancer survivors: Cancer is being constructed as a significant and powerful disease as opposed to a trivial and time-limited one; this lends legitimacy to calls for on-going surveillance and support for cancer survivors. The profession that positions itself as being the experts and specialists in cancer is likely to be able to make the claim to provide on-going support with the most authority.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hubbard, G., Forbat, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A13-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Formulations of living with cancer: a discursive analysis of nurse talk]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A14</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A14-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of information intervention on social distress; a randomised pilot study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A14-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Unresolved social difficulties are prevalent in oncology patients, can impact on well-being and undermine ability to cope with the larger stressors of disease and treatment. Information may deal with psychosocial issues without over-burdening staff. A randomised pilot study investigated the impact of a specifically designed Support Services Information Pack (SSIP) on levels of social distress in routine practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The SSIP was designed and evaluated. Adult patients receiving active treatment were randomised to intervention or control group. The Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI-21) assessed the severity of social difficulties at baseline and after the last of four review consultations. The intervention group received the SSIP prior to the second consultation. The sum of 16 of the SDI-21 items was used to provide an overall index of social distress (SD-16, range 0 to 44). All participants were interviewed on completion. Counts were taken of the number that used the SSIP. Analysis of covariance tests compared mean SD-16 scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants: 165 patients were approached, 88 consented and 75 completed the study. Complete SD-16 data was available for 70 patients. The SSIP was not extensively used; the majority of patients read it but took no action, but may use it in future (67%). The mean SD-16 scores were 8.53 for the intervention group (95% CI 7.1 to 9.9) and 8.25 for the control group (CI 6.7 to 9.8).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>During this pilot study the SSIP was not used. Timing of delivery of the intervention will be investigated in future trials.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingleson, E. J., Hector, C., Campbell, L., Bartlett, Y., Brown, J., Wright, P., Velikova, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.39</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A14-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of information intervention on social distress; a randomised pilot study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A14</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A14</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A14-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Illness perceptions, adjustment to illness and depression in a palliative care population]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A14-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Context</st>
<p>Representations of illness have been studied in several populations but research is limited in palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To describe illness representations in a population with advanced disease receiving palliative care; and to examine the relationship between illness perceptions, adaptive coping and depression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cross-sectional survey of 301 consecutive eligible patients recruited from a palliative care service in South London, UK. Measures used included the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ), the Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (MAC) and the PRIME-MD PHQ-9.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Scores were not normally distributed for the majority of the questions on the IPQ. The correlations found between items on the Brief IPQ were understandable in the context of advanced disease. MAC hopelessness-helplessness and fighting spirit were highly correlated with items on the brief IPQ in opposite directions. The Brief IPQ domains of consequences, identity, concern, personal control and emotion were associated with depression; a relationship which was not explained by adaptive coping. Seven causal attribution themes were identified: Don't know, personal responsibility, exposure, pathological process, intrinsic personal factors, chance/fate/luck and other. Both lung cancer diagnosis and gender were found to be independently associated with personal responsibility attribution. None of the attribution themes were associated with the presence of depression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Assessment of illness perceptions in palliative care is likely to yield important information about risk of depression and will help clinicians to personalise management of advanced disease.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Price, A., Goodwin, L., Rayner, L., Shaw, E., Hansford, P., Sykes, N., Monroe, B., Higginson, I. J., Hotopf, M., Lee, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.40</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A14-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Illness perceptions, adjustment to illness and depression in a palliative care population]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A14</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A14</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A14-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['It's all bad news': the first 3 months following a diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A14-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st>
<p>MPM is a rare cancer with a rising incidence associated with asbestos exposure. The disease is invariably fatal with many people dying within a year of diagnosis, with typical survival of only 7&ndash;10 months.</p>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>This study explores how patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) cope during the first 3 months following diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study uses narrative interviews with 10 people diagnosed with MPM during the first 3 months following diagnosis, from two hospital trusts in the UK. Data was analysed using the constant comparative method to identify common categories and then themes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A key theme that emerged from the data was the feeling of hopelessness associated with MPM in that it is &lsquo;all bad news&rsquo;. Participants describe suffering distress around how their disease will progress. They avoid seeking information as everything they hear about the disease is so negative and there are few effective treatments available. The study identifies a lack of psychosocial and emotional support for people with MPM leading to a sense of isolation, fear and uncertainty about the future and the progress of the disease. Participants report receiving little help and advice related to significant symptoms such as sweating, pacing themselves and coping with breathlessness on exertion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Few patients received an early referral to specialist palliative care. A palliative rehabilitative approach is recommended early on following diagnosis to support hope and manage the many physical symptoms and emotional distress.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arber, A., Spencer, L., Parker, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.41</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A14-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Respiratory cancer, Hospice, Poisoning, Occupational and environmental medicine, Environmental issues]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['It's all bad news': the first 3 months following a diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A14</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A15</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A15-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving care and support for people with progressive illness in primary care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A15-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>The Palliative Care Directed Enhanced Service (DES) was introduced in Scotland in 2008/2009 to stimulate anticipatory care by GP practice teams. We aimed to evaluate how practices were implementing this by assessing how they were<l type="tab"><li><p> identifying patients for their palliative care register (PCR),</p>
</li><li>
<p> assessing/reviewing needs,</p>
</li><li>
<p> sharing information with out of hours (OOH) providers,</p>
</li><li>
<p> using the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP).</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Six practices were recruited from three Scottish Health Boards. Data were collected on current palliative care patients and on patients dying in the previous 6 months; semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs, district nurses (DN) and administrative staff (total 20) and with patients and bereaved relatives (total 11); the researcher observed multidisciplinary practice meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Only 29% of patients were on the PCR prior to death (range 10&ndash;38% between practices). Of these, 69% had cancer, 17% organ failure and 14% dementia or physical frailty and 25% died in hospital (cf. 44% of all deaths). 52% on the current PCR had a record of preferred place of care and 35% of resuscitation status. Practices valued better focused and structured palliative care, improved communication with OOH providers and introduction of the LCP but raised some difficulties in including non-cancer patients on the PCR. Patients and relatives appreciated pro-active care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Despite this initiative few patients were identified for palliative care. However when identified, their multidisciplinary and OOH care improved and hospital admissions to die decreased. Practices must identify more patients earlier for palliative care.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harrison, N., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., Murray, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.42</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A15-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Memory disorders (neurology), Hospice, Memory disorders (psychiatry), Resuscitation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving care and support for people with progressive illness in primary care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A15</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A15</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A15-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying patients with supportive and palliative care needs in acute cardiology]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A15-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Due to the variable illness trajectory and uncertain prognosis, most patients with advanced heart disease fail to receive adequate end-of-life care. The Gold Standards Framework (GSF) has been used in primary care to identify such patients. We assessed its utility in patients presenting in the acute hospital setting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Consecutive patients with ACS admitted to an acute cardiology unit, over two separate 4 week periods, were included. Data were collected from patient notes and interviews with doctors. Patients were assessed using GSF and a clinical prognostic score (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, GRACE). All patients were followed-up for 1 year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>168 patients were included. 40 (24%) patients were identified under the GSF as being in the last year of life due to their heart disease. Compared with GSF negative patients, GSF positive patients had a significantly higher GRACE score (13.9 vs 8.3, p=0.002). The GRACE score of patients who died within 6 months was significantly higher than those who survived (20.2 vs 9.27, p=0.008). GSF poorly predicted 6 month mortality (sensitivity 17%) but was strongly predictive of all-cause readmission during follow-up (p=0.000001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>GSF may be useful in predicting readmissions in ACS patients but is poor at predicting mortality. Combining GSF criteria with GRACE may guide secondary care clinicians in identifying ACS patients who may benefit from end of life care.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fenning, S. J., Woolcock, R., Haga, K., Skene, C., Boyd, K., Murray, S. A., Denvir, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.43</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A15-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, General practice / family medicine, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Drugs: cardiovascular system, Ischaemic heart disease, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying patients with supportive and palliative care needs in acute cardiology]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A15</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A15</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A15-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The relationship between an inflammation-based prognostic score (Glasgow Prognostic Score) and survival in cancer patients in the hospice setting]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A15-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction/aims</st>
<p>There is increasing evidence that an ongoing systemic inflammatory response is associated with poor outcome in cancer patients. The object of this study was to assess whether an inflammation-based prognostic score (Glasgow Prognostic score, GPS) was associated with survival in patients admitted to a specialist palliative care unit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The GPS scores were constructed as follows: patients with both an elevated C reactive protein level (&gt;10 mg/l) and hypoalbuminemia (&lt;35 g/l) were allocated a GPS score of 2. Patients who had only one of these two biochemical abnormalities were allocated a GPS of 1. Patients with neither abnormality were allocated a GPS of 0. This GPS was prospectively calculated in patients (n=77) over a period of 4 months. The date of admission to date of death (or censor date if death had not occurred by end of study) was also calculated for each patient.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Using Kaplan Meier survival curves, it was highlighted that patients with a higher GPS score had a shorter survival time than those with a lower GPS score (p=0.001). Specifically, patients with a GPS score of 2 had a much shorter survival than those with a lower GPS score of 0 or 1(p&lt;0.001). Furthermore, patients with a GPS score of 1 or 2 had a shorter survival than those with a GPS of 0 (p=0.012).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The presence of a systemic inflammatory response (GPS) is significantly associated with cancer-specific survival and may be a useful indicator of poor outcome in cancer patients in the hospice setting.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cunningham, L. J., Buchanan, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A15-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Inflammation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The relationship between an inflammation-based prognostic score (Glasgow Prognostic Score) and survival in cancer patients in the hospice setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A15</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A15</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A16-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative care in developing countries: University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital Experience]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A16-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aim</st>
<p>Palliative care services have started springing up in some tertiary health institutions in Nigeria in recent time. University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital is one of these institutions. This paper presents our experience over a period of 20 months, and highlight the challenges of providing palliative care in a hospital primarily set up to provide curative and preventive healthcare services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The case notes of all the patients seen by the palliative care unit over a period of 20 months, (May 2009 to December 2010), were reviewed. Data collected include demographic characteristics, sources of referral, reason for referral, primary diagnosis, patients' symptoms and interventions provided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 113 patients, (84 females and 29 males), with various forms malignancies were seen during the study period. The age ranged between 18 and 90 years with a mean of 63.7 years. The commonest form of malignancy was cancer of the breast, which occurred in 54 (47.8%) patients followed by colorectal carcinoma 11 (9.7%). Pain was the commonest (77%) indication for referral to the unit. Interventions provided included pain and symptom control, psychotherapy, counselling, spiritual support, home care and Bereavement support. The overall mortality for the period of the study was 39.8%. Major challenges include financial constraints, high patient drop-out rates due to inability to pay care costs, inadequate awareness of service and lack of vehicle for home visit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The palliative care unit of the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital has made significant impact on the lives of patients and their families suffering from various forms of malignancies. Though relatively new, the unit has a great potential for growth.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kolawole, I. K., Sleiman, Z. A., Olafimihan, K. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A16-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Pain (neurology), Colon cancer, Hospice, Psychotherapy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative care in developing countries: University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital Experience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A16</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A16</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A16-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Systemic inflammation and symptom severity in patients with advanced cancer: a prospective study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A16-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>Pain, depression, fatigue and nausea are common symptoms in cancer and can cause significant physical and psychological distress. In non-malignant conditions, systemic inflammation is implicated in the genesis of these symptoms. The relationship between inflammation and these symptoms in cancer is less clear. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of systemic inflammation and pain, fatigue, depression and nausea/vomiting in patients with advanced cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>An observational, cross-sectional study conducted in a specialist palliative care unit. All cancer patients admitted over a 3 month period were assessed. Eligible patients had assessments of inflammation (C reactive protein (CRP) and albumin) and symptoms (ESAS). A bivariate statistical analysis was conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>64 patients were assessed with 50 being eligible. Significant correlations (Spearman) were found for pain (0.343, p=0.015) and depression (0.357, p= 0.011) with CRP. No significant correlations were found for fatigue (0.020, p=0.890) and nausea/vomiting (0.276, p=0.052). No significant associations were found for any symptom and serum albumin.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Systemic inflammation is related to pain and depression in cancer. Such a relationship may provide a therapeutic opportunity for specific anti-inflammatory therapy that improved pain and depression. Further work examining this relationship would be of interest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haworth, G., Rush, R., Fallon, M., Laird, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A16-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Immunology (including allergy), Pain (neurology), Inflammation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Systemic inflammation and symptom severity in patients with advanced cancer: a prospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A16</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A16</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A16-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management of emotional distress in cancer patients: is there a role for antidepressants?]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A16-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Depression is common in cancer patients and often associated with increased morbidity, hospitalisation and reduced quality of life. Current opinion supports the use of antidepressants (AD) for moderate and severe depression in physical illness. However, AD may be inadequately prescribed to oncology patients and factors other than need may influence prescribing practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To explore oncology professionals views on the use of AD in the management of emotional distress in cancer patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>18 randomly selected professionals from the Yorkshire Cancer Network (oncologists, surgeons, clinical nurse specialists and ward nurses) participated in a qualitative interview study. To explore their views on AD use in oncology they were asked: What leads you to prescribe AD? or Do you have any views on the use of AD? key themes were extracted via framework analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Despite recognising the value of AD in cancer care, professionals were reluctant to prescribe AD stressing a lack of knowledge <I>I would be very worried about my ability to do that</I> and overwhelmingly saw the general practitioner (GP) as most appropriate for this role. Overreliance on AD was voiced as were views that taking AD was defeatist <I>medicating them is a slippery slope.</I></p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These findings highlighted a need for training on the use of AD in cancer care and to counteract negative views contributing to exclusion from treatment plans. A key prescribing role for the GP is described however it is unclear whether referrals are made. Future work should determine the role of the GP and map prescribing patterns elsewhere.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holch, P., Absolom, K. L., Pini, S., Hill, K., Liu, A., Sharpe, M., Richardson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A16-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, General practice / family medicine, Stroke, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management of emotional distress in cancer patients: is there a role for antidepressants?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A16</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A16</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A16-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) in chronic heart failure patients]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A16-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) suffer significant mortality and morbidity. New patient-centred methods of assessing quality of life are needed that focus on supportive and palliative care needs. We aimed to assess a previously validated palliative care outcome scale (POS) questionnaire in patients with CHF.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients seen by Specialist Heart Failure Nurses in outpatient clinics and on home visits were recruited. POS questionnaires were completed by patients at three time points over an 8 week period. Specialist Heart Failure Nurses completed a POS at baseline for each patient. Patients completed the Euroqol EQ5D at the end of the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Average age was 73, and all patients had left ventricular failure. 32 patients completed the baseline questionnaire; 25 completed questionnaires at all 3 time points. Patient POS scores were significantly consistent between time points (p&lt;0.0001) and a significant correlation was found between patient POS and EQ5D scores (p=0.019). Patient POS scores did not correlate significantly with staff POS scores, NYHA class, number of comorbidities or mortality predicted by the Seattle Heart Failure Model. Staff POS scores under-predicted patient scores for 20 out of 28 patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Consistency between POS scores at different time points and a significant correlation to EQ5D scores suggest that the POS questionnaire has a degree of robustness in assessing patient-perceived quality of life. The lack of correlation between patient perception and &lsquo;objective&rsquo; measures of health deserves further exploration, as does the apparent over-estimation of quality of life by nursing staff.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma, A., Reid, J., Ness, A., O'Donnell, M., Yellowless, D., Boyd, K., Murray, S. A., Denvir, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A16-d</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Drugs: cardiovascular system, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) in chronic heart failure patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A16</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A17</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A17-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Audit of the use of a screening tool to improve recognition of delirium in a palliative care unit]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A17-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The British Geriatric Society recommends that all older patients admitted to hospital are screened for delirium using a tool such as the abbreviated mental test (AMT). No similar guidelines specifically for palliative patients exist. However delirium is very common in patients in specialist palliative care units (SPCU). Delirium remains under diagnosed and is associated with a poor prognosis. It is often reversible if recognised early and the cause identified and treated promptly. A previously undertaken audit showed that no screening tool for delirium was currently used in our SPCU despite high prevalence of delirium. The action plan recommended the introduction of routine screening.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To audit the use of AMT in patients admitted to SPCU.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Following previous audit junior doctors were asked to perform an AMT on every new admission. Education and labels listing the 10 AMT questions to stick in notes were provided. Case note review for 20 SPCU in-patients was performed on 1 day 4 months after the introduction of screening tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>70% of patients had an AMT performed on admission. The patients who did not have an AMT done were mainly in the terminal phase of their illness. 43% of patients who had an AMT performed scored less than 8 suggesting that they have a high chance of delirium.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The introduction of the screening tool has improved the number of newly admitted patient's being assessed for delirium.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cogdell, L. M., Lunt, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.49</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A17-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Long term care, Delirium, Memory disorders (psychiatry), Screening (epidemiology), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Audit of the use of a screening tool to improve recognition of delirium in a palliative care unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A17</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A17-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['You're sicker than you think': continuing communication problems in end stage heart failure]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A17-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st>
<p>Heart failure is a terminal condition. Yet it has been demonstrated that compared to cancer, health professionals (HPs) lack confidence in diagnosing end stage heart failure (ESHF) and communicating a poor prognosis to patients. The present study seeks to explore patient and carer level of understanding of the diagnosis and prognosis, and how ESHF patients and carers make sense of their condition and plan for the future, and what part HPs play.</p>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study involves semi-structured interviews with 22 ESHF patients and their carers and explored their knowledge and understanding of the condition and its prognosis. Qualitative data analysed using thematic analysis but informed by Normalisation Process Theory. Inclusion criteria: at least Grade 3 or 4 NYHA classification HF; who have ongoing symptoms despite optimal therapy; and have a history of admissions for this condition and their carer (defined as the person most closely involved with them).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients and carers generally understood the patient had heart problems although the term &lsquo;heart failure&rsquo; was rarely used. Many patients had been unwell with heart problems for many years and the transition to ESHF remained unclear with few seeming to appreciate their prognosis. There was little evidence of direct communication about prognosis, with patients sometimes becoming fixated on comments by HPs such as, &lsquo;you&rsquo;re sicker than you think, you know' and wondering how to interpret such comments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study has highlighted continuing problems with regard to ESHF patient and carer knowledge and understanding of their condition.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mair, F. S., Browne, S., Morrison, D., Macleod, U., May, C. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.50</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A17-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Drugs: cardiovascular system]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['You're sicker than you think': continuing communication problems in end stage heart failure]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A17</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A17-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The role of primary care in cancer care: the views and experiences of patients and family members]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A17-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>The role of primary care in the provision of cancer care is poorly defined. Practices in are offered a financial incentive to conduct a review with new patients within 6 months of diagnosis, but the extent to which these reviews occur and their scope and perceived usefulness is unknown. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of primary care in caring for and supporting cancer patients and their families.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 38 patients, diagnosed within the last 3 years. Patients were stratified by time since diagnosis, and a maximum variation sampling strategy was employed to achieve heterogeneity in terms of cancer type and socio-demographic variables. We interviewed 19 males and 19 females, with a range of 14 different cancers. Patients were invited to ask their partner/close relative to participate &ndash; 24 family members were interviewed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Although generally satisfied with their GP practice, most patients were unaware of having had a review or any specific discussion of their cancer-related care, despite records indicating the contrary. Most patients and family members would have welcomed pro-active involvement from their GP practice and felt that a designated review appointment would provide a good opportunity to raise any concerns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Although patients and family members see an important role for primary care in cancer follow-up care this is not universally being delivered at present and there is real scope for improving practice in this area.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adams, E., Watson, E. K., Boulton, M. G., Rose, P. W., Richardson, A., Lund, S., Wilson, S., Savage, B., Rauf, A., Belcher, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.51</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A17-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The role of primary care in cancer care: the views and experiences of patients and family members]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A18</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A18-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Characteristics of adequate outcome of continuous palliative sedation]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A18-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Palliative sedation is a palliative care intervention for relieving severe suffering in the last phase of life. This study aims to distinguish characteristics of adequate sedation outcome compared to less favourable outcome based on physicians' reports.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In 2008, a structured questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 1580 physicians working in general practice, nursing homes and hospitals regarding their last patient receiving continuous sedation until death. Adequate outcome was defined as cases where adequate relief of symptoms, good to very good quality of death and no adverse reactions were reported by the physician.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 606 physicians (38%) filled out the questionnaire, of whom 370 (61%) reported about their last case of continuous deep sedation. Cases characterised as adequate outcome (n=110) significantly more often had nausea (16% vs 7%), but less often delirium (7% vs 15%) as decisive indication for palliative sedation. Significantly more often, cases defined as adequate were sedated with the (partial) intention of hastening death (19% vs 13%), exhibited a shorter median duration of sedation (32 (IQR 16&ndash;48) versus 48 (IQR 24&ndash;73) h), had a shorter median duration to reach the required sedation depth (2 (IQR 1&ndash;4) versus 4 (IQR 2&ndash;12), were more often sedated deeper (94% vs 84%) and received a stable administration of benzodiazepines and opioids (52% vs 26%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Differences between perceived adequate and less adequate sedation outcome may be related to intention and mode of administration of palliative sedation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buma, S., Brinkkemper, T., Swart, S. J., Rietjens, J. A. C., Deliens, L., Ribbe, M., Loer, S. A., Zuurmond, W. W. A., Perez, R. S. G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.52</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A18-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hospice, Delirium, Memory disorders (psychiatry), Other anaesthesia, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Characteristics of adequate outcome of continuous palliative sedation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A18</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A18</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A18-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of clinicians' and advanced cancer patients' estimates of survival]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A18-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To determine whether doctors, nurses or the multi-professional team (MPT) are better at prognosticating in advanced cancer. To determine which clinician factors influence prognostic accuracy. To investigate patients' views about receiving prognostic information and to evaluate the accuracy of their own estimates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>As part of a large prospective multi-centre study to develop a novel prognostic scoring system for patients with advanced cancer, clinicians were asked to estimate whether patients were expected to live for &lsquo;days&rsquo;, &lsquo;weeks&rsquo; or &lsquo;months+&rsquo;. Patients were asked whether and how they would wish to receive prognostic information and whether they would be willing/able to estimate their own prognosis. Survival was calculated from date of study entry. Prognostic accuracy of different groups was compared using linear weighted  (LWK).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>1018 patients with advanced cancer were studied; 127 doctors, 281 nurses and 290 patients provided 829, 954 and 290 prognostic estimates respectively. MPT estimates were available for 987 patients. LWK varied between 0.14 (patients) and 0.46 (MPT). Patients' estimates were significantly worse than doctors', nurses' or MPT estimates (all p&lt;0.001). Nurses' estimates were significantly worse than the MPT estimate (p=0.007). No clinician factors (age, gender, experience or grade) were consistently associated with better prognostic accuracy. Most patients (61.4%) wanted to know their prognosis of whom 48% wanted to know it &lsquo;approximately&rsquo; and 52% wanted to know &lsquo;exactly&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Most patients wish to know their prognosis. Clinicians' predictions are inaccurate and patients' predictions are significantly worse. MPT estimates are the most accurate.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwilliam, B., Keeley, V., Todd, C., Gittens, M., Roberts, C., Kelly, L., Barclay, S., Stone, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.53</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A18-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of clinicians' and advanced cancer patients' estimates of survival]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A18</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A18</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A18-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and predictors of supportive care needs in lung cancer patients]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A18-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Lung cancer is a disease of high symptom distress, increased psychosocial burden, short survival and a high mortality. The Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) can be used to assess individuals' supportive care needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To evaluate lung cancer patients' supportive care needs and predictors of increased supportive care needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients completed questionnaires on any visit. Total POS score and prevalences of individual items and were calculated. Demographics and clinical variables were recorded. Predictors of increased supportive care needs were evaluated using logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 353 patients, 303 fully completed POS. At least one unmet supportive care need was identified in 97.4% of patients. POS <I>x</I>=9.81 (SD5.87, 95%CI 9.15 to 10.47). Prevalence of moderate to severe symptoms were: 56.9% perceived support network anxiety, 45.6% personal anxiety, 40.8% pain, 30.5% had unmet information needs, 29.6% reduced self-esteem, 20.1% practical matters needed addressed, 21.2% able to share feelings occasionally or less, 17% affected by &lsquo;other&rsquo; symptoms, 12.1% low life-worth and 9.6% felt at least 1/2 a day had been wasted through healthcare appointments. An increased POS score was significantly predicted by: poor performance status (PS=2, OR 3.99 CI 1.83 to 8.70; PS=3&ndash;4, OR 7.62 CI 3.49 to 16.61), age less than 65 years (OR 0.37 CI 0.19 to 0.73) and presence of increasing respiratory symptoms (OR 1.48 CI 1.23 to 1.78). There was no significant effect from gender, histology, stage, time from diagnosis, treatment type or deprivation category.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Lung cancer patients have significant supportive care needs. Poorer physical function, younger age and presence of respiratory symptoms predict increased needs.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buchanan, D., Milroy, R., Baker, L., Thompson, A. M., Levack, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.54</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A18-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Pain (neurology), Lung cancer (oncology), Lung cancer (respiratory medicine)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and predictors of supportive care needs in lung cancer patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A18</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A19</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A19-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Healthcare professionals' views on factors influencing end-of-life care in hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A19-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>The majority of patients die in the acute setting, yet care delivered to the dying in hospitals is variable and the underlying reasons for this are not documented well. We aimed to explore healthcare professionals' views on the factors influencing good quality end-of-life care within an acute hospital Trust.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Within a feasibility study examining the impact of a simple end-of-life care tool on the dying experience we carried out qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals caring for dying patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five focus groups, nine face-to-face and two &lsquo;think aloud&rsquo; interviews were analysed using the framework approach. The emerging themes were: difficulties in diagnosing dying (eg, senior doctors were required to validate the diagnosis when they might not know the patient well); role of the doctor (often task-based and directed by the nurses); changing role of nursing staff (leading end-of-life care); hospital culture (reluctance to withdraw active treatments; it was &lsquo;brave&rsquo; to state a patient was dying); environment (appropriateness for dying patients) and the EOL tool validating care (nurses found the regular symptom scoring required by the tool helped them approach patients and families and give more appropriate care).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This qualitative study has identified factors influencing care given to dying patients in an acute hospital setting. We suggest these factors need to be taken into account when trying to improve care for dying patients and in facilitating the use of EOL care pathways.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forbes, K., Gibbins, J., Burcombe, M. E., Bloor, S. J., Reid, C. M., McCoubrie, R. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.55</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A19-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Healthcare professionals' views on factors influencing end-of-life care in hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A19</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A19-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Non-professional carers' views on the care of the dying; the impact of a simple end-of-life care tool]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A19-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>The Department of Health's End of Life (EOL) strategy promotes integrated care pathways for the dying as a means of improving end-of-life care. We designed a pilot study to determine whether a simple EOL care tool could improve the dying experience in an acute hospital setting as perceived by carers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>40 patients received &lsquo;usual&rsquo; end-of-life care and 30 patients had their end-of-life care directed by a simplified EOL care tool. Bereaved carers were contacted a month after the patient's death and asked to complete the validated VOICES questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>20/40 questionnaires were returned by carers whose relatives received &lsquo;usual&rsquo; care and 18/30 by carers whose relative received care directed by the tool. Although numbers are small and therefore changes are not statistically significant, improvements were seen in the responses regarding medical and nursing care (43.8% of relatives rated nursing care as excellent in the usual care group compared to 83% in the EOL tool group). Benefits were also seen for pain management (56.3% of carers perceived their relative had pain receiving usual care vs 28% in those receiving the care tool). More carers were present when their relative died following introduction of the tool (43.8% for usual care vs 67% for those receiving the care tool).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Non-professional carers reported improvements in some aspects of end-of-life care following the introduction of a simple EOL care tool. This needs further testing in an adequately powered trial.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forbes, K., Gibbins, J., Burcombe, M. E., Bloor, S. J., Reid, C. M., McCoubrie, R. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.56</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A19-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Pain (neurology), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Non-professional carers' views on the care of the dying; the impact of a simple end-of-life care tool]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A19</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A19-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative care pathways for teenagers and young adults with cancer]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A19-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st>
<p>In 2009, a Palliative Care subgroup of the teenagers and young adults with cancer (TYAC) service development group was formed and asked to develop best practice guidelines for the Palliative, End of Life (EoL) and Bereavement care for teenagers and young adults (TYA) with cancer.</p>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Relevant national guidelines from paediatric and adult palliative care, as well as clinical expertise from around the UK from both medical, nurse, social and education, were used to develop draft pathways to guide generic clinicians in the provision of care of a TYA with cancer, and his/her loved ones, from the time that it is recognised that his/her malignancy is incurable, through to care in early bereavement. The pathways were disseminated widely within the membership of TYAC for comments and suggestions as well as from parents and carers. Amendments were made in the light of the comments received.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three pathways were developed that outline the range of interventions needed to provide optimal Palliative care, End of Life care and Bereavement care for TYA with cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These pathways will be disseminated and used as a gold standard to guide provision of service and audit care for this population.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stirling, L. C., Anderson, A. K., Lewis, J., Stoneham, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.57</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A19-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, End of life decisions (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative care pathways for teenagers and young adults with cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A19</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A19-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recruiting malignant & non-malignant disease patients: lessons from a palliative care RCT]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A19-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Recruiting patients to palliative care randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is challenging. This paper describes and analyses recruitment trajectories for patients with malignant and non-malignant disease to a palliative care RCT, outlining lessons learned.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Analysis of descriptive recruitment statistics (patient identification and response rates) to a Phase II pilot pragmatic single-blind fast track RCT, and subsequent Phase III RCT, of a breathlessness intervention service for advanced disease. Phase II piloted COPD patients only, whereas Phase III RCT incorporated two sub-protocols: for patients with malignant or non-malignant disease. Documentary analysis of: recruitment activity log, Trial Management and Advisory Group minutes and fieldnotes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Recruitment targets for patients with non-malignant disease were achieved. The pathway to recruitment was through referral to the service therefore referral rates impacted on recruitment alongside response rates. Recruitment of cancer patients was considerably slower despite concerted efforts to increase referrals by raising the service profile. Referrals only improved for the latter when a researcher attended clinics, supporting clinical staff in patient identification. Predictably, response rates remained lower than for non-malignant disease patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Recruitment was partly referral-driven, therefore gate-keeping did not explain the differences. Clinical inter-professional relationships consolidated in Phases 0-II drove early referrals of non-malignant disease patients. Local palliative care services were available for cancer patients. Consideration of the natural history and context of a service is therefore important when predicting recruitment. Pilot trials are informative, but should include qualitative elements and all disease groups. Placing researchers in relevant clinical settings is helpful.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farquhar, M., Brafman-Kennedy, B., Higginson, I. J., Booth, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.58</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A19-d</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recruiting malignant & non-malignant disease patients: lessons from a palliative care RCT]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A20</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A20-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using the measure of patient centred communication to assess oncology consultations]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A20-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st>
<p>Numerous instruments to assess doctor-patient communication have been developed to date. The Measure of Patient Centred Communication (MPCC)<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> was created for use in primary care and measures three components of communication (1) Exploring the disease (2) Understanding the whole person (3) Finding common ground. In ongoing research we are exploring the suitability of the MPCC for assessing chemotherapy review consultations. Here we present our preliminary experiences of using this coding framework.</p>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Between October 2009 and November 2010, 496 outpatient consultations with 124 patients were audio-recorded at St James' Institute of Oncology, Leeds. All patients were receiving chemotherapy for either advanced colorectal (n=49), gynaecological (n=48) or breast cancer (n=27). A team of eight coders are analysing recordings using both the MPCC and content analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Preliminary findings suggest the MPCC can be applied to oncology consultations. The coding team have reached agreement on how to code key issues discussed by patients and doctors including symptoms of the cancer, side effects of treatment, questions about prognosis, treatment decision making and the doctors' explanations about cancer status throughout chemotherapy cycles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The MPCC may be a useful tool for examining patient-centredness in oncology. Future work will explore the value of the MPCC in assessing the impact of routinely collecting and feeding back patient reported outcome (PRO) data to oncologists. The MPCC will be used to assess if training oncologists to interpret and use the PRO data improves patient-centred care in consultations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Absolom, K., Hector, C., Campbell, L., Eng, S., Taylor, S., Takeuchi, E., Warrington, L., Ziegler, L., Velikova, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.59</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A20-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[General practice / family medicine, Breast cancer, Communication]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using the measure of patient centred communication to assess oncology consultations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A20</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A20</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A20-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying end of life needs in acute cardiac patients: a comparison of prognostic tools]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A20-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Identifying patients with non-malignant disease in the hospital setting who might benefit from palliative and supportive care is challenging. There is little research in this area. A screening tool, the Scottish Palliative Care Indicator Tool (SPICT) was developed to help identify acute cardiac patients who might benefit from supportive/palliative care. We aimed to compare this new tool with the Gold Standards Framework Prognostic Indicator Guide (GSF-PIG)and two clinical prognostic scores currently used in hospital practice (GRACE and Seattle).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Consecutive patients admitted to a cardiology ward with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and acute heart failure (AHF) over a 4 week period were identified. Data for SPICT, GSF-PIG, GRACE (estimated 6 month% mortality) and Seattle scores (estimated 12 month% mortality) were obtained from patient records and by interviews with hospital staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>
<tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">ACS (78)</c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">AHF (16)</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">% meeting criteria</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Mean GRACE score(% (SD))</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">% meeting criteria</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Mean Seattle score (% (SD))</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">SPICT negative</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">92.3</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10.0 (9.9)</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">75.0</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13.2 (8.2)</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">SPICT positive</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7.7</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20.0 (12.4)</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25.0</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13.3 (7.3)</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">p value(t test)</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">p=0.022</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">p=0.985</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">GSF negative</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">84.4</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9.5 (9.8)</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">37.5</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12.3 (11.6)</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">GSF positive</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">15.6</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17.0 (11.3)</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">62.5</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13.7 (4.9)</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">p value(t test)</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">p=0.019</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">p=0.745</c></r></tblbdy></tbl>
</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>SPICT and GSF identified ACS patients with significantly higher risk of death within 6 months of discharge. Neither prognostic tool appeared to predict Seattle score mortality in patients with AHF. SPICT and GSF have equivalent predictive utility in identifying acute cardiac patients nearing end-of life.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woolcock, R., Fenning, S., Haga, K., Skene, C., Boyd, K., Murray, S. A., Denvir, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.60</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A20-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), Drugs: cardiovascular system, Ischaemic heart disease, End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Screening (epidemiology), End of life decisions (ethics), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying end of life needs in acute cardiac patients: a comparison of prognostic tools]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A20</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A20</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A20-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Co-ordination of generalist care for patients towards the end of life: a literature review]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A20-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aim</st>
<p>Increased coordination and collaboration have been highlighted as improving the provision of health and social care for people at the end of life. We aimed to review the literature concerning coordination or collaboration of care to determine whether coordination and collaboration improves the quality of care delivered by generalists towards the end of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Searches in PUBMED and ISI Web of Knowledge for the stems &lsquo;coordinat-&lsquo; or &lsquo;collaborat-&lsquo; in the context of the stem &lsquo;palliat-&lsquo; or the phrase &lsquo;terminal care.&rsquo; Search of Web of Knowledge for the categories &lsquo;generalist health care&rsquo; and &lsquo;palliative.&rsquo; Search of PUBMED MeSH terms &lsquo;palliative care admin and organisation&rsquo;, &lsquo;terminal care admin and organisation&rsquo; and &lsquo;Cooperative Behavior.&rsquo; Electronic searches were supplemented by hand searches of leading palliative care journals (2008&ndash;2010).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>1672 articles initially identified as requiring further screening, and 55 eligible studies identified. Different approaches/terminology to enabling coordination and collaboration were identified including networks, integrated care pathways, partnerships, frameworks, programmes and &lsquo;collaboratives&rsquo;. Lack of coordination and/or collaboration was routinely identified as a barrier to good palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Approaches to enabling coordination and collaboration are evident in the literature but no metrics to measure coordination or collaboration were uncovered so it is impossible to determine whether a particular intervention increased coordination or collaboration. Therefore more research to determine whether collaboration and coordination improves quality of care is needed. Management or organisational theory as well as robust evaluation of models of co-ordination is indicated to guide current policy developments. This will require increased conceptual clarity regarding the terms collaboration and coordination in this context.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mason, B. L., Barclay, S., Dale, J., Daveson, B., Donaldson, A., Epiphaniou, E., Harding, R., Higginson, I. J., Munday, D., Nanton, V., Shipman, C., Murray, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.61</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A20-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[End of life decisions (geriatric medicine), End of life decisions (palliative care), Hospice, Screening (epidemiology), End of life decisions (ethics), Internet, Quality improvement, Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Co-ordination of generalist care for patients towards the end of life: a literature review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A20</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A21</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A21-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Promoting supportive and palliative care research by a management fellow]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A21-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Following a successful bid to undertake research into co-ordination of palliative care needs of patients within the generalist setting, the research team was offered the opportunity to employ an NHS manager to become a &lsquo;Management Fellow.&rsquo; The aim was to provide a means to embed research expertise in the local NHS area through the personal development of the fellow: including training in research methods, assistance in all stages of the research process and taking a lead in the subsequent dissemination throughout the clinical areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>We enlisted a Clinical Nurse Manager half time while she continued to work 50% within the Acute Hospital structure. The management fellow recruited has become immersed in the world of research. The fellow is also the subject of an auto-ethnographic exploration of the tensions involved in integrating her own clinical practice with her role as a researcher.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Initial findings show that the management fellow has adapted to the joint clinical management/research role, facilitating integration into research site, assisting with recruitment of participants and identifying methods to ensure effective knowledge exchange and mobilisation within her substantive role as Clinical Nurse Manager.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Early indications are that by ensuring a management representative on the research team the research pathway can be smoothed to allow effective research to be undertaken. The management fellow is ideally place d to facilitate the research team's presence and through immersion becomes supportive and understanding of the importance of research. Finally the management fellow is well situated to ensure effective knowledge mobilisation within the clinical areas.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donaldson, A., Barclay, S., Dale, J., Daveson, B., Epiphaniou, E., Harding, R., Higginson, I. J., Mason, B. L., Munday, D., Nanton, V., Shipman, C., Murray, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.62</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A21-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Nursing, Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Promoting supportive and palliative care research by a management fellow]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A21</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A21</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A21-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative care delivery in Kenya and Malawi: a review of models]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A21-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>There is an urgent need to develop serviceable models of palliative care. A case study evaluation of eight palliative care programmes in Kenya and Malawi was undertaken to define the current models, understand their context, identify challenges and explore transferable lessons.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A desk based review was conducted on the health environment and systems. Eight sites were visited and interviews held with staff, community and local health leaders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Models of palliative care fell into three categories &ndash; specialist, district hospital, and rural health clinic/community level. Staffing levels and the type of work undertaken were influenced by the model, but lack of support systems meant that all models ended up delivering a mix of services. All consistently emphasised pain relief, symptom management and comprehensive care, but differed in their integration into mainstream services, and ability to understand and actively respond to dynamic patient need. This was influenced by staff knowledge, and level of clarity on staff roles. Questions arising in terms of the models of care include &lsquo;who shapes the work?&rsquo;, &lsquo;who delivers the work?&rsquo;, &lsquo;who plans the working day?&rsquo;, &lsquo;who defines what palliative care is?&rsquo;, &lsquo;who manages changing patient needs? and &lsquo;is the model patient or professional centred? &lsquo;Challenges include the diversity of diseases and need, limited referral options, the tendency to &lsquo;be everything for everyone&rsquo;, and the speed of scaling up of services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Stand alone models of palliative care have evolved, but many are trying to deliver beyond capacity. When developing a programme, questions on defining the role of palliative care, who and how work is delivered, and support networks need to be asked.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant, L., Downing, J., Leng, M., Namukaya, L., Murray, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.63</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A21-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Hospice, Pain (palliative care), Pain (anaesthesia)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative care delivery in Kenya and Malawi: a review of models]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A21</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A21</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A21-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determining cost-effectiveness of advanced cancer care: a systematic review of economic models]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A21-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To determine the strengths and limitations of current approaches used in economic analyses of advanced cancer care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a systematic review of EMBASE, AMED, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and MEDLINE from inception to June 2010 using search terms advanced or terminal illness, cancer, and cost or economic studies. We included studies that reported economic evaluations using decision analytical models, within patients with advanced cancer, with any intervention and published in English. We extracted data on health system context, model type, model time horizon and model outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>28 papers were eligible for inclusion, the majority of these were undertaken in Europe or USA. 17 Markov models and 10 decision trees were identified. Most (z) models used lifetime horizons but (x) used curtailed horizons without any clear rationale between studies for time horizon selected. Model outcomes varied; most used quality of life (QOL), but some used survival, and one estimated the likelihood of effective pain management. Measurement of QOL was the most commonly cited limitation in all models. (Z) studies relied on healthcare professionals' valuations of QOL rather than patients' own valuations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We found no consistent model type or time horizon used in studies assessing cost effectiveness of interventions in advanced cancer. In models with shorter durations, additional future costs such should be considered such as those related to further operative procedures, or palliative treatments. The validity of these models may be weakened by using utility values that are not derived directly from patients with advanced cancer.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hulme, C., Browne, C., Mansfield, J., Pavitt, S., Hall, P. S., Bennett, M. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.64</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A21-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health policy, Pain (neurology), Stroke, Hospice, Health economics, Internet, Health service research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determining cost-effectiveness of advanced cancer care: a systematic review of economic models]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A21</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A22</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A22-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introducing volunteers into chemotherapy day units: a mixed methods evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A22-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Within many USA Cancer Centres, the presence of volunteers is an important factor for improving patient experience. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pilot project of introducing a volunteer role to support cancer patients using two Chemotherapy Day Units. The study sought to answer the following questions:<l type="tab"><li><p> Did the volunteer training programme meet the needs of the volunteers and prepare them for their role?</p>
</li><li>
<p> How did the volunteer programme impact on patients' experiences and satisfaction with care?</p>
</li><li>
<p> What benefits were realised and challenges encountered from the perspective of stakeholders involved?</p>
</li><li>
<p> What structures and processes are necessary to ensure the volunteer programme maximises its effect on future patient care?</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This mixed methods evaluation was exploratory and spanned 1 year. Data collection included:<l type="ord"><li><p>A prospective audit of patients' experiences and satisfaction with care undertaken at baseline and end of the pilot project.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Questionnaires and interviews with volunteers at the end of the project.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Interviews with staff and stakeholders at the end of the project.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>The evaluation revealed the introduction of volunteers in cancer services was successful. The training programme met the volunteers' needs, prepared them for their role. It also fostered feelings of being supported and part of a team. The patient survey and staff interviews revealed volunteers enhanced patients' experience and satisfaction with care. The evaluation has shown how a &lsquo;neutral&rsquo; person can have a positive impact on patient care. Much of the volunteers' time was spent talking to patients and providing companionship which was appreciated by patients and carers. Staff and stakeholder interviews revealed benefits in terms of &lsquo;bridging the gap&rsquo; between the healthcare team and the patient and family. The results have provoked discussion about how best to sustain this initiative and incorporate others areas of care delivery. Presently volunteers are being prepared for other areas of the service.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wiseman, T., DeBerker, D., Miller, C., Griffin, M., Richardson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.65</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A22-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patients]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introducing volunteers into chemotherapy day units: a mixed methods evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A22</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A22</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A22-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spiritual wellbeing in sub-Saharan Africa: the meaning and prevalence of 'feeling at peace']]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A22-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Palliative care (PC) is an urgent public health issue in Africa, but evidence to inform the spiritual dimension of PC is lacking. Feeling at peace is strongly correlated with spiritual wellbeing (SWB), and occurs in spiritual measures validated cross-culturally in PC populations. We aimed to:<l type="letterupper"><li><p>Determine levels of SWB among PC patients in South Africa and Uganda.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Explore how patients interpret &lsquo;feeling at peace&rsquo;.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p><l type="letterupper"><li><p>Cross-sectional survey using the APCA African Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) item: &lsquo;Over the past 3 days, have you felt at peace?&rsquo; (&lsquo;0= no, not at all&rsquo; &ndash; &lsquo;5= yes, all the time&rsquo;).</p>
</li><li>
<p>Semi-structured interviews including cognitive interviewing of the POS, analysed thematically.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><l type="letterupper"><li><p>285 patients surveyed; mean age 40.1; 69.1% women; diagnosis: 80.7% HIV; 17.7% cancer; 1.6% other. Mean peace score 2.92. 27.0% scored 0&ndash;1.</p>
</li><li>
<p>72 patients interviewed in 7 languages. Mean age 45.1; 66.7% women; diagnosis: 59.7% HIV; 40.3% cancer. Interpretations of peace fell into four categories: perception of self/ world (peace as a feeling/acceptance/experience); relationship with others; relationship with God; health-related. Barriers to peace included uncontrolled pain, stigma, economic/family worries.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This is the first study into the SWB of PC patients in sub-Saharan Africa. &gt;25% of patients had not felt at peace in the previous 3 days, or only very rarely. Feeling at peace was interpreted in existential, social, religious and physical terms. Asking whether a patient feels at peace may be effective in eliciting concerns in African PC.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Selman, L., Harding, R., Higginson, I. J., Gysels, M., Speck, P., The Encompass Collaborative]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.66</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A22-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Infectious diseases, Immunology (including allergy), Pain (neurology), Hospice, Sexual health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spiritual wellbeing in sub-Saharan Africa: the meaning and prevalence of 'feeling at peace']]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A22</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A22</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A22-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A checklist for reporting factor analysis in palliative care research]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A22-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Factor analysis (FA) is a statistical technique that analyses underlying relationships in a data set. It is mainly used in the development and validation of questionnaires. Since valid outcome measures have become important in palliative care, criteria to judge the quality of FA are needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To systematically review the current use and reporting of either exploratory or confirmatory FA and recommendations for FA, in order to design a checklist for reporting FA in the field of palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In this systematic literature review, a hand search identified all studies using factor analytical techniques published in the four peer-reviewed journals Palliative Medicine, Journal of Pain &amp; Symptom Management, Journal of Palliative Medicine, and the Journal of Palliative Care (inception &ndash; Mai 2010). Included were studies of any design, except reviews, reporting the results of one or several exploratory or confirmatory FA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In 575 issues screened, 189 factor analytical studies were identified. Since the year 2000, FA has increasingly been applied in palliative care. It is mainly used in the development of new measures, to create subscales and to assess the multidimensionality of a measure, or in the evaluation (eg, translation) of an existing measure. The frequencies of different criteria (eg, ratio of sample size to number of items, factor extraction models, criteria for retaining factors, rotation techniques) will be analysed. On this basis, recommendations will be designed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The checklist developed provides guidance for journal editors, clinicians and researchers who need to judge or report a FA in palliative care.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramsenthaler, C., Siegert, R. J., Higginson, I. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.67</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A22-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology, Pain (neurology), Hospice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A checklist for reporting factor analysis in palliative care research]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A22</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A23</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A23-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing and testing a measure to describe the quality of cancer MDT meetings]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A23-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Cancer multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) aim to improve clinical outcomes, co-ordination of care and patient experience by including all relevant health professionals in discussions about individual patients. A central activity is thereby the MDT meeting (MDM) where cases are discussed and recommendations agreed. MDTs vary in performance according to national peer review data but no standardised measures of MDT effectiveness exist. We have developed an observational measure of MDM quality and conducted preliminary tests of its application.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>13 key characteristics of MDM effectiveness within 4 domains were included: The Team; Infrastructure for meetings; Meeting organisation and logistics; and Clinical decision-making. Quality criteria were derived from literature review, observing MDMs and expert input. Inter-rater reliability and expert validity were tested and confirmed. A manual was developed describing each characteristic and the quality criteria (from &lsquo;insufficient&rsquo; to &lsquo;fully comprehensive&rsquo;), and the measure was applied to 10 bowel MDTs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Observation was acceptable to teams and feasible to do within the restraints of a busy MDT meeting. Preliminary application demonstrated wide diversity in quality between teams across all four domains. A degree of internal consistency in quality within teams was evident. Teams were most likely to meet &lsquo;fully comprehensive&rsquo; criteria in relation to administrative preparation and attendance at meetings; and least likely for patient-centredness of decision-making, presentation of minimum dataset and prioritisation of the agenda.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Preliminary application suggests the measure may contribute to the assessment of MDT performance. Further testing to confirm the validity and reliability is required.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor, C., Atkins, L., Richardson, A., Ramirez, A.-J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.68</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A23-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing and testing a measure to describe the quality of cancer MDT meetings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A23</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A23</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A23-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Defining the characteristics of effective MDT working in cancer care]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A23-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Cancer multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) aim to improve clinical outcomes, co-ordination of care and patient experience by including all relevant health professionals in discussions about individual patients. MDTs vary in performance according to national peer review data. Defining the characteristics of effective MDT working is a necessary first step to address this. Due to the dearth of relevant evidence and to gain clinical engagement, we sought views from MDT members' regarding the characteristics of MDT effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>An on-line survey was conducted between January and March 2009. Invitations to participate were filtered to MDT members through cancer networks and by a link on the NCIN website. Subsequently a series of workshops with stakeholders developed findings into working definitions of the characteristics of an effective MDT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>2054 MDT members responded to the survey, including representatives from all core professional groups, and most tumour types. Domains of MDT-working (including the team, infrastructure for meetings, organisation and logistics, patient-centred clinical decision-making and team governance) was agreed to be important for effective teamworking by most (78&ndash;99%) MDT members. At least 80% of members agreed with most (62/87) statements relating to these domains. Few differences in views by professional group or tumour type were evident. Findings were translated to &lsquo;The characteristics of an effective MDT&rsquo; (NCAT, 2010).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>&lsquo;The characteristics of an effective MDT&rsquo; provides a framework from which to facilitate teams to work optimally. A mechanism to self-assess against characteristics combined with the necessary support to facilitate change is now required.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor, C., Ramirez, A.-J., on behalf of the National Cancer Action Team]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.69</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A23-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Defining the characteristics of effective MDT working in cancer care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A23</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A23</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A23-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of guidelines for the management of cancer related fatigue]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A23-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cancer related fatigue (CRF) is a common symptom that is neither formally assessed not actively addressed. Despite a plethora of tools available for measuring fatigue, there is a lack of a clear pathway for its management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To develop guidelines for management of fatigue to be used together with a computerised touch screen system for patients to report fatigue.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A literature review was conducted on management of CRF. This was followed by a series of individual meetings with physiotherapists (3), dieticians (2) sleep physicians (2), sleep nurse (1), providers of complementary therapists (4) to ascertain referral criteria and types of local services available for cancer patients with fatigue. Informal meetings with SHOs (2), consultant oncologists (2) and nurses (11) helped ascertain current management strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There is a paucity of knowledge surrounding the management of CRF, and a lack of awareness of available services. A local guideline was developed as an <I>aide memoire</I> for medical oncologists and nurses. Information is presented in sections with assessment questions to determine the level of fatigue, prompts for biologic assessments and its corresponding management. A traffic light system is used to represent severity of fatigue, matching it with available services and information, contact details, referral criteria and structured advice on diet, exercise and sleep.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The guidelines will be used as part of a resource package for training doctors and will be available in outpatient clinics.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eng, S., Velikova, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.70</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A23-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Diet]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of guidelines for the management of cancer related fatigue]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A23</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A24</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A24-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The UK breakthrough cancer pain registry: origin, methods and preliminary data]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A24-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is a debilitating element of cancer pain. Rapidly absorbed formulations of fentanyl, such as fentanyl sublingual tablets (FST, Abstral, proStrakan, Galashiels, UK), are well matched to the rapid onset and short duration of BTcP episodes. Only limited data are available on the use of such agents outside clinical trials. The UK BTcP Registry was initiated to record patients' and clinicians' experiences of titration and treatment with FST.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The UK BTcP Registry is an ongoing prospective, multi-centre programme. Any patient prescribed FST at a participating centre is eligible for inclusion. Patients and clinicians complete BTcP questionnaires at baseline and after successful titration or cessation of FST therapy; questions include disease history, analgesic use, pain response and medication preference. Questionnaire results are uploaded via a secure online system. The questionnaires and online system also provide clinicians with a method for ongoing monitoring of patients' experiences and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>To date, 33 patients have been recruited from 12 centres. In a preliminary analysis (n=31), patients experienced a mean of 4.9 BTcP episodes/day. 23/33 patients (70%) successfully titrated, and did so in a mean of 5.1 days; for 19/23 patients (83%), titration was easy/acceptable. Median pain relief was 70% with titrated FST, compared to 50% at baseline. 12/14 patients (86%) preferred FST to their previous medication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The UK BTcP Registry is a valuable developing resource, providing data on the effectiveness of FST (Abstral) outside of a clinical trial setting. It also provides a monitoring tool for front-line clinicians.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ward, J., Laird, B., Fallon, M., on behalf of the B TcP Registry Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.71</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A24-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Pain (palliative care), Pain (anaesthesia), Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The UK breakthrough cancer pain registry: origin, methods and preliminary data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A24</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A24-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of expressive writing as an intervention for patients following a mastectomy for breast cancer - a feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A24-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Breast cancer and treatment can significantly affect bodily appearance. Older women are as likely as younger women to experience body dissatisfaction that is significantly related to poorer mental health. Despite this, the needs of older women for psychological support during cancer treatment remain under-studied.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>This feasibility study investigated the efficacy and limitations of expressive writing as an intervention for body dissatisfaction following mastectomy for breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>32 women who had mastectomy for breast cancer in the last 5 years were randomised to intervention (expressive writing) or control (factual writing) arms. Both arms completed 3<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>20-min writing sessions. The intervention arm wrote about their deepest feelings regarding surgery and the impact this had on how they feel about their body. The control arm wrote about their daily activities. Patients completed quality of life assessments 2 weeks and 3 months post intervention and attended an exit interview at 3 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Analysis of the exit interviews showed that patients in the expressive writing group experienced a variety of benefits including; catharsis, reflection, expressing themselves anonymously and the facilitation of future discussions with friends, family and professionals. Negative experiences of the writing included; difficulties expressing emotions, &lsquo;dredging up&rsquo; negative experiences and resistance to reflection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Expressive writing is low-cost intervention that may benefit patients experiencing body dissatisfaction following mastectomy. Patients felt the intervention would be well received at the end of treatment and would be suitable to a broad range of patients who may not typically use support or therapeutic services.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pini, S., Harley, C., O'Connor, D., Velikova, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.72</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A24-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Stroke, Breast cancer, Breast surgery, Surgical oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of expressive writing as an intervention for patients following a mastectomy for breast cancer - a feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A24</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A24-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The social difficulties of cancer patients of South Asian Indian and Pakistani origin]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A24-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cancer patients experience psychosocial and informant needs. The National Cancer Survivorship Initiative recommends a shift towards assessment, information provision, personalised care planning and support for self-management including assessment within the social domain. This shift may be particularly difficult to implement with people for whom the language and culture do not fit with the majority.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>In a sample of patients of South Asian (SA) origin to:<l type="ord"><li><p>evaluate feasibility and acceptability of introducing assessment of social difficulties in everyday practice,</p>
</li><li>
<p>examine the range and severity of reported social difficulties,</p>
</li><li>
<p>inquire about their management.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study in which participants completed the Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI-21) in English, Urdu, Punjabi or Hindi followed by a semi-structured interview (subjected to Framework Analysis).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>26 men and 29 women (age range 18 and 80) with a range of diagnoses participated. Commonest primary languages were Urdu (n=17), Punjabi (n=17). SA cancer patients would welcome routine assessment of social difficulties as part of cancer care. They reported higher levels of social distress than found in earlier studies of white British patients. The majority self-managed their social difficulties with little discussion with clinicians, although this would have been welcomed. SA patients lacked information and were unaware of available support, especially when language was a barrier.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Inclusive introduction of routine psychosocial assessment into cancer care requires not only appropriate screening tools but also staff trained to respond to the difficulties with knowledge of relevant information and supportive care services.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dharni, N., Hanif, N., Bradley, C., Velikova, G., Stark, D., Wright, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.73</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A24-c</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Screening (oncology), Screening (epidemiology), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The social difficulties of cancer patients of South Asian Indian and Pakistani origin]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A25</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A25?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors influencing exercise capacity in people with thoracic cancer]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A25?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Abstract</st><sec><st>Introduction and aims</st>
<p>Patients with thoracic cancer often complain of a reduced exercise capacity which can impede levels of independence and quality of life. Several factors may be responsible but there is little formal study in this group. We have explored how various physiological and psychological factors relate to performance in a test of exercise capacity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Inspiratory muscle strength, peripheral muscle power, lung function and mastery over breathlessness were assessed using sniff nasal inspiratory pressure, leg extensor power, simple spirometry and the mastery domain of the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire respectively. Exercise capacity was assessed using the Incremental Shuttle walk Test (ISWT) during which patients wore a K4 b2 system allowing continuous measurement of heart rate, minute ventilation (VE) and oxygen uptake (VO2). Relationships between ISWT distance and independent factors were determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient and &beta; regressions coefficients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>41 patients (21 male, mean (SD) age 64 (8) years) took part. They walked a median (IQR) 320 (250&ndash;430) m and reached 76 (10)%, 48 (14)% and 77 (25)% of their predicted maximal heart rate, VE and VO2 respectively. Exercise capacity was significantly associated only with inspiratory muscle strength (r=0.42, p&lt;0.01) and peripheral muscle power (r=0.39, p=0.01). These factors were also significant determinants of exercise capacity (&beta; coefficients (95% CI) 1.77 (0.53 to 3.01) and 1.22 (0.31 to 2.14)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Both inspiratory and peripheral muscle performance appear to influence exercise capacity in people with thoracic cancer. Interventions aimed at maintaining or slowing down the decline in exercise capacity should include components targeting muscular performance.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maddocks, M., England, R., Manderson, C., Wilcock, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.74</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A25</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Stroke]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors influencing exercise capacity in people with thoracic cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Posters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A25</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A25</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A27?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author index]]></title>
<link>http://spcare.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/1/Suppl_1/A27?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000020.authorindex</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:bmjspcare;1/Suppl_1/A27</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Reproductive medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author index]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Author index</prism:section>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A27</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A28</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
