Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a tablet PC technology to screen and educate oncology patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Goal

The aim of the study was to evaluate The Patient Assessment, Care and Education (PACE) System™—an electronic patient symptom screening and reporting system for oncology. Specifically, the study determined provider and patient opinions of The PACE System™ and documented evidence as to whether symptom assessment rates increased after this system was implemented.

Materials and methods

Ninety-two providers (i.e., physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) at 16 community oncology clinics were surveyed about their experiences with The PACE System™. In addition, 100 patients at two community oncology clinics were surveyed about their perceptions of The PACE System™. Finally, at two oncology clinics, 100 patient charts were abstracted in the year before implementation of The PACE System™, and 100 patient charts were abstracted in the year after its implementation to evaluate changes in symptom assessment rates.

Main results

Providers seemed to value the system. In particular, they reported that the screening and reporting system helped them to identify, track, and document the patients’ most important symptoms. The patient survey indicated that the majority of patients at the two sites found the system easy to use and generally helpful and would recommend it to others. The chart review indicated that assessment rates for depression, fatigue, and pain increased after The PACE System™ was implemented.

Conclusions

The PACE System™ appears to be a promising approach to addressing the widespread problem of under-identification and under-treatment of symptoms in patients receiving cancer treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LD, Aaronson NK (2002) Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:3027–3034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fortner B, Baldwin S, Schwartzberg L, Houts AC (2006) Validation of the cancer care monitor items for physical symptoms and treatment side effects using expert oncology nurse evaluation. J Pain Symptom Manage 31:207–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fortner B, Okon T, Schwartzberg L, Tauer K, Houts AC (2003) The cancer care monitor: psychometric content evaluation and pilot testing of a computer administered system for symptom screening and quality of life in adult cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 26:1077–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McLachlan SA, Allenby A, Matthews J, Wirth A, Kissane D, Bishop M, Beresford J, Zalcberg J (2001) (Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessments versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:4117–4125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Patrick DL, Ferketich SL, Frame PS, Harris JJ, Hendricks CB, Levin B, Link MP, Lustig C, McLaughlin J, Reid LD, Turrisi AT 3rd, Unutzer J, Vernon SW (2004) National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue, July 15-17, 2002. J Natl Cancer Inst 9-16

  6. Ruland CM, White T, Stevens M, Fanciullo G, Khilani SM (2003) Effects of a computerized system to support shared decision making in symptom management of cancer patients: preliminary results. J Am Med Inform Assoc 10:573–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE, Speca M, DeGagne T, Olson K, Doll R, Rosberger Z (2000) Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psychooncology 9:203–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM, Selby PJ (2004) Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oncol 22:714–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation through a Health e-technologies grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tami L. Mark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mark, T.L., Fortner, B. & Johnson, G. Evaluation of a tablet PC technology to screen and educate oncology patients. Support Care Cancer 16, 371–378 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0312-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0312-1

Keywords

Navigation