-
The research nurses found ePOCS an interesting study. -
ePOCS research nurses were the experts in the study at multidisciplinary team meeting. -
Broad eligibility criteria meant large numbers of patients could be approached and recruited. -
Recruitment criteria allowed a varied time of approach postdiagnosis. -
ePOCS required no additional hospital visits. -
Research nurses found ePOCS easier to explain to patients than clinical trials of investigational medicinal products. -
The ePOCS study was easy for patients to understand. -
Patients were interested in ePOCS -
It was easy for patients to make a decision about joining ePOCS. -
Immediate patient consent was allowed.
|
-
The ePOCS research nurses had to put in a lot of effort to get doctors on board. -
As there was a broad eligibility criteria and there were many clinics to cover. -
The ePOCS study was not a high priority in clinics. -
Usually doctors needed reminding to mention to patients about the ePOCS study. -
Cover for ePOCS research nurse absence was a problem. -
ePOCS research nurses found it hard to support other portfolio studies as their time was taken up with ePOCS. -
Obtaining patient notes to file ePOCS consent forms was an issue. -
No follow-up with patients was a downside. -
Being involved in ePOCS only could become dissatisfying over time. -
As with other studies, ePOCS research nurses felt under pressure to recruit which was not so good when recruitment is not going well.
|