TY - JOUR T1 - Persistent inequalities in Hospice at Home provision JF - BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care JO - BMJ Support Palliat Care DO - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001367 SP - bmjspcare-2017-001367 AU - Jackie Buck AU - Liz Webb AU - Lorraine Moth AU - Lynn Morgan AU - Stephen Barclay Y1 - 2018/02/15 UR - http://spcare.bmj.com/content/early/2018/02/15/bmjspcare-2017-001367.abstract N2 - Objective To describe the nature and scope of a new Hospice at Home (H@H) service and to identify its equality of provision.Methods Case note review of patients supported by a H@H service for 1 year from September 2012 to August 2013 (n=321). Descriptive analysis to report frequencies and proportions of quantitative data extracted from service logs, referral forms and care records; thematic analysis of qualitative data from care record free text.Results Demand outstripped supply. Twice as many night care episodes were requested (n=1237) as were provided (n=613). Inequalities in access to the service related to underlying diagnosis and socioeconomic status. 75% of patients using the service had cancer (221/293 with documented diagnosis). Of those who died at home in the areas surrounding the hospice, 53% (163/311) of people with cancer and 11% (49/431) of those without cancer received H@H support. People who received H@H care were often more affluent than the population average for the area within which they lived. Roles of the service identified included: care planning/implementation, specialist end-of-life care assessment and advice, ‘holding’ complex patients until hospice beds become available and clinical nursing care.Conclusion There is significant unmet need and potentially large latent demand for the H@H service. People without cancer or of lower socioeconomic status are less likely to access the service. Action is needed to ensure greater and more equitable service provision in this and similar services nationally and internationally. ER -