Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Why don't end-of-life conversations go viral? A review of videos on YouTube
  1. Imogen A Mitchell1,2,
  2. Anne L R Schuster2,
  3. Thomas Lynch3,
  4. Katherine Clegg Smith4,
  5. John F P Bridges2 and
  6. Rebecca A Aslakson3
  1. 1The Commonwealth Fund, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  2. 2Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Massachusetts, USA
  3. 3Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine and Palliative Care Program, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Massachusetts, USA
  4. 4Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Massachusetts, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rebecca A Aslakson, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine and Palliative Care Programme, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe Street, Meyer 297A, Baltimore, MD 21287-7295, USA; raslaks1{at}jhmi.edu

Abstract

Objective To identify videos on YouTube concerning advance care planning (ACP) and synthesise existing video content and style elements.

Methods Informed by stakeholder engagement, two researchers searched YouTube for ACP videos using predefined search terms and snowballing techniques. Videos identified were reviewed and deemed ineligible for analysis if they: targeted healthcare professionals; contained irrelevant content; focused on viewers under the age of 18; were longer than 7 min in duration; received fewer than 150 views; were in a language other than English; or were a duplicate version. For each video, two investigators independently extracted general information as well as video content and stylistic characteristics.

Results The YouTube search identified 23 100 videos with 213 retrieved for assessment and 42 meeting eligibility criteria. The majority of videos had been posted to YouTube since 2010 and produced by organisations in the USA (71%). Viewership ranged from 171 to 10 642. Most videos used a documentary style and featured healthcare providers (60%) rather than patients (19%) or families (45%). A minority of videos (29%) used upbeat or hopeful music. The videos frequently focused on completing legal medical documents (86%).

Conclusions None of the ACP videos on YouTube went viral and a relatively small number of them contained elements endorsed by stakeholders. In emphasising the completion of legal medical documents, videos may have failed to support more meaningful ACP. Further research is needed to understand the features of videos that will engage patients and the wider community with ACP and palliative and end-of-life care conversations.

  • Communication
  • Clinical decisions
  • Terminal care
  • Received 17 October 2014.
  • Revision received 13 May 2015.
  • Accepted 23 June 2015.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

  • Received 17 October 2014.
  • Revision received 13 May 2015.
  • Accepted 23 June 2015.
View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.