Article Text

other Versions

PDF
The networks of care surrounding cancer palliative care patients
  1. N Jarrett1,
  2. K Porter1,
  3. C Davis2,
  4. J Addington-Hall1,
  5. S Duke1,
  6. J Corner1 and
  7. J Lathlean1
  1. 1Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Innovation and Leadership in Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hants, UK
  2. 2Countess Mountbatten House, Moorgreen Hospital and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hants, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr N Jarrett, Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Innovation and Leadership in Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, Hants SO17 1BJ, UK; nj1{at}soton.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives This paper explicates the nature and extent of the networks of care surrounding patients with cancer palliative care needs.

Method Twenty-four patients with 15 different types/sites of cancer were recruited in one city in England, UK. During one in-depth interview patients identified who was ‘involved in their care’ and any known pathways of communication between them. One hundred of these people (35 doctors, 32 nurses, 17 professions allied to medicine, 8 family members and 8 others) were also interviewed. Maps of people/teams and the connections between them for each patient were then reconstructed using social networking software (PAJEK).

Results The 24 patients identified a total of 619 people or teams (mean 26, median 22, range 9–45 per patient) contributing to their care. Selected care network maps are displayed, illustrating the extent and nature of the care networks supporting palliative care patients. Common members of care networks for patients with palliative care needs are revealed, but their individual and unique nature is also apparent.

Conclusions The possible clinical utility and challenges of mapping care networks are discussed. Exploring the care networks surrounding individual patients can be useful for illuminating the extent and complexity of individual patient's care networks; clarifying who is involved and who they communicate with; providing opportunities to see interaction routes that may otherwise be hidden, revealing potentially missing or weak connections; and highlighting overlaps or gaps in provision.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

  • Received 25 August 2014.
  • Revision received 23 January 2015.
  • Accepted 11 March 2015.
View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.