Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of the Liverpool Care Pathway in the Netherlands: a qualitative study
  1. Natasja Raijmakers1,2,
  2. Anneke Dekkers3,
  3. Cilia Galesloot3,
  4. Lia van Zuylen2 and
  5. Agnes van der Heide1
  1. 1Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3Palliative Care, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Natasja J H Raijmakers, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; n.raijmakers{at}nivel.nl

Abstract

Objectives The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) is a quality instrument for the dying patient. This study evaluates barriers and facilitators to its implementation in the Netherlands from the perspective of key stakeholders, to inform future implementation processes.

Methods An interview study was conducted among 28 stakeholders involved in implementation of the LCP in the Netherlands, followed by a consecutive focus group with 8 interviewees to discuss and validate the findings of the interview study. Interviews were conducted by telephone and the notes taken during the interviews and focus group were transcribed into non-verbatim transcripts. Data collected during the interviews and focus group were evaluated using thematic analysis.

Results According to the stakeholders, a context analysis prior to implementation was useful to find the appropriate orientation to adequately motivate healthcare professionals as well as management. The main contributing factors were the quality of the LCP (including its evidence-based character and completeness), and that it fitted the needs of healthcare professionals. During the implementation phase, a multidisciplinary project team, competent support and continuous monitoring were identified as important facilitators. Furthermore, for successful implementation, a facilitator working in liaison with others was helpful. To guarantee sustainability of the use of the LCP, it was important to disentangle tasks from the project leader and formally integrate these into the quality systems of the organisation.

Conclusions The Dutch experience with large-scale implementation of the LCP has identified important barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a quality instrument within palliative care. To successfully implement such a promising instrument, liaison with others is important. The sense of being part of a process of improvement is valuable, while consolidation of this idea contributes to successful implementation.

  • Service evaluation
  • Received 23 March 2014.
  • Revision received 24 July 2014.
  • Accepted 24 August 2014.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

  • Received 23 March 2014.
  • Revision received 24 July 2014.
  • Accepted 24 August 2014.
View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.