Article Text

PDF
P-115 Ceiling of treatment: A communication tool to minimise harm from futile interventions in hospital patients at the end of life
  1. D Robin Taylor1,
  2. Eleanor Grant2 and
  3. Martin Carberry3
  1. 1Wishaw General Hospital, NHS Lanarkshire and Honorary Fellow, Primary Palliative Care Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK
  2. 2Wishaw General Hospital, NHS Lanarkshire, UK
  3. 3NHS Lanarkshire, UK

Abstract

Background Ceiling of Treatment (CofT) is a protocol designed to:

  1. Encourage prognostic conversations and planning for treatment limitation/escalation in the event of acute deterioration in hospital patients nearing end-of-life.

  2. Facilitate improved out-of-hours communication and reduce discontinuity of care.

  3. Minimise interventions that are futile, burdensome, or contrary to the patient’s wishes.

  4. Prompt palliation of acute symptoms irrespective of cause.

Six condition-specific formats have been introduced across 3 hospitals.

Aims

  • #1. to assess effectiveness as judged by hospital staff (n = 18);

  • #2. to explore relevance in patients attended by hospital Rapid Response Team (RRT) (n = 85) AND with DNACPR order (n = 9);

  • #3. to quantify CofT use among palliative care (PC) referrals  (n = 28).

Methods Three audits. (#1) A questionnaire was administered to ward staff. (#2) Detailed case review was undertaken. (#3) Frequency of use was documented.

Results (#1) 17/18 (93%) reported that CofT had a positive impact on patient care. (#2) 8/9 RRT-attended crises were allegedly “reversible”; 3/9 had CofT; in 6/9, if the treatment plan had been written prospectively using CofT, inappropriate interventions would have been avoided in 6/9. (#3) CofT was documented in 10/26 (38%) of PC referrals but deemed appropriate in 26/28 (93%).

Conclusions (#1) CofT provides for more secure decision making among hospital staff dealing with acute crises in end-of-life patients. (#2) Lapses in communication rather than failure to consider limitations of treatment result in over-treatment. CofT would be beneficial. (#3) All patients referred for palliative care would benefit from CofT in addition to DNACPR.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.