Background/context Hospices are expected to quantify the quality of care and demonstrate outcome improvements1,2. There has been a change in emphasis from system and process to outcome1-4. However, little hospice-specific guidance is available1-6.
The DMH produces quarterly quality monitoring (QM) reports and is seeing useful intelligence.
To produce hospice-specific intelligence
To evidence that the hospice remains low risk.
Approach used QM is part of the hospice’s well-established clinical governance function. Reports use monthly (& rolling annual) data with published statistics (Office of National Statistics; National End of Life Care Intelligence Network).
Electronic patient-notes enable data collation in a way that was impossible with paper notes.
Hospice-specific outcome indicators have been developed to evidence compliance with outcome measures given in the NICE 2011 quality statements2 and the essential standards of quality and safety4.
Outcomes The hospice has robust evidence of the following:
Number (%) and diagnosis of patients receiving care
Primary care aim
Equity of access
Impact of the 24/7 advice line
Percentage of hospice
deaths of patients offered an ACP
patients achieving their preferred place of care.
Percentage of in-patients
on the LCP at the time of their death.
assessed for risks associated with moving and handling.
experiencing minor/serious injury.
assessed for tissue viability within 6 hours of admission.
Waterlow score - an indication of patient frailty.
The DMH can demonstrate that twice as many EOL patients receiving care die at home as those not referred to the hospice.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.