Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
Republished: Legalising assisted dying puts vulnerable patients at risk and doctors must speak up
  1. Bill Noble
  1. Correspondence to Dr Bill Noble, Academic Unit of Supportive Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S11 9NE, UK; bill.noble{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Assisted dying is legal, physician assisted suicide for mentally competent adults who are terminally ill. Now that another piece of legislation has had its first reading in the UK House of Lords,1 the debate is on again. I have no religious objections, but I recoil from the vision of a society where death is a therapeutic option; the idea that there are two categories of suicidal people, those deserving and those undeserving of death; and the idea that doctors should do the sorting and the killing.

In June 2012, the BMJ carried editorials supporting the call from the Healthcare Professionals for Assisted Dying (HPAD) for medical organisations—such as the BMA and the royal colleges—to adopt ‘studied neutrality’ on the question of legalising assisted suicide.2 ,3 The BMJ's editor, Fiona Godlee, is right to argue that society and not the medical profession should determine the law. But if organisations representing doctors step back, while legislation insists on doctors’ involvement, we abrogate responsibility for our patients and the next generation of doctors.

Doctors worry about …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests I have read and understood the BMJ Group policy on declaration of interests and declare the following interests: membership of the BMA, Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of General Practitioners, and Association for Palliative Medicine.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Correction
    British Medical Journal Publishing Group