Background Although advance care planning (ACP) in hospitals is important, the best means of promoting it in Japan remain to be clarified.
Aim The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of end-of-life care teams (EOLCTs) for both cancer and non-cancer patients. The secondary aim was to evaluate the usefulness of narrative life reviews and ACP conducted by full-time EOLCT nurses using qualitative analysis.
Methods We conducted the ‘three-pillar strategy for decision making’ for the families of 209 patients. There are three large pillars, (1) patient's wishes; (2) family's wishes; and (3) medical judgment. There are also three key pillars in regard to patients' wishes: (1) ‘Present’: Regardless of the patient's competence/incompetence, any subtle signs shown by the patient must be noted; (2) ‘Past’: ACP and narrative life reviews must be checked; and (3) ‘Future’: The best future interests must be considered. The patient's wish is the most important pillar.
Results Intervention by the three-pillar strategy in EOLCT decision making tended to increase the number of home deaths in accordance with patients' wishes in collaboration with the home care support ward. Narrative life reviews by nurses led to enhancement of ACP.
Discussion The most important finding was that patients' and their families' wishes were respected.
Conclusion The three-pillar strategy used by EOLCT in decision making was useful in enhancing hospitals' ACP.
- Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.