Background This paper explores the tensions that exist between clinical advance care planning initiatives and the complex amalgam of laws that govern medical treatment decision making, particularly decision making in relation to patients who do not have the capacity to consent to their own treatment.
Aim The aims of the paper are to identify the current challenges faced by advocates of advance care planning—from both clinical and legal perspectives—and to propose reforms.
Methods The paper considers the current legal parameters in which advance care planning operates, and also considers some recent reform initiatives in Australia, including the adoption of a national framework for advance directives, as well as key recommendations arising from recent guardianship law reviews in Queensland and Victoria.
Conclusion In considering whether the law should lead, follow, or get out of the way, the paper concludes by suggesting that reforms are warranted that would enable it to do all three. It should lead, by ensuring the protection of vulnerable people. It should follow, by more meaningfully recognising current advance care planning initiatives and scholarship. And it should get out of the way, by reducing, and where possible eliminating, current unnecessary legal complexities.
- Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.