Article Text

PDF

Morning Breakout 2—Palliative Care
UNDERSTANDING HOW CANCER PATIENTS ACTUALISE, RELINQUISH, AND REJECT ADVANCE CARE PLANNING: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
  1. N Michael1,
  2. N Stepanov2,
  3. O Spruyt1,
  4. A Pollard3,
  5. J Clayton4 and
  6. C O'Callaghan1
  1. 1Department of Pain and Palliative Care, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
  2. 2Centre for Health in Society & Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, University of Melbourne
  3. 3Department of Psychology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
  4. 4HammondCare Palliative and Supportive Care Service & University of Sydney

Abstract

Background Although advance care planning (ACP) is recognised as intégral to quality cancer care, it remains poorly integrated in many settings. Given cancer patients' unpredictable disease trajectories and equivocal treatment options, a disease specific ACP model may be necessary.

Aims To examine how Australian cancer patients consider ACP and inform the development of an Australian Cancer Centre's ACP programme.

Methods A constructivist research approach drawing on the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions. Participants described their initial understanding of ACP, received ACP information, and finally completed a semi-structured interview assisted by the vignette technique. Qualitative inter-rater reliability was integrated.

Results Twenty-nine patients from the lung and gastro-intestinal tumour streams were approached with 18 completing the study. Participants initially had scant knowledge of ACP. On obtaining further information, their responses indicated that: For cancer patients, ACP is an individualised, dynamic, and shared process characterised by myriad variations in choices to actualise, relinquish, and/or reject its individual components. Actualisation of each component involves considering, possibly conversing about, planning, and communicating a decision, usually iteratively. Reactions can change over time and are informed by values, memories, personalities, health perceptions, appreciation of prognoses, and trust or doubts in their substitute decision makers.

Discussion/Conclusion Findings endorse the value of routinely, though sensitively discussing ACP with cancer patients at various times points across their disease trajectory. Nonetheless, ACP may also be relinquished or rejected and ongoing offers for ACP in some patients may be offensive to their value system.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.