Background Medical teams in acute hospitals often do not set goals of treatment for patients, especially those who are frail or complex. Hospitals have limitation of treatment policies, but compliance is often poor. The need for palliative care is also under-recognised.
Aim This was an observational audit to determine whether patients in a tertiary Melbourne hospital had goals and limitations of treatment documented by the treating team, and the association with length of stay and outcome.
Method Over 2 weeks, the records of hospital inpatients were reviewed. Data included demographics, co-morbidities, goals and limitations of treatment (LOT), need for referral to palliative care and outcomes.
Results 290 records were reviewed; 55% were male, average age was 67. 60% of patients had no goals of treatment. Ten patients were asked about advance care plans. Of those who should have had LOT according to hospital policy, 55% had no plans. 23 patients were suitable for Palliative Care, but only 9 had been referred. 18% of patients were confused; 60% of these had no record of discussions with family. 9% of patients died, 76% went home and 8% to residential care.
Discussion There was a lack of setting goals and limitations of treatment and under-referral to palliative care. Patients were more likely to die or go to residential care the longer they stayed in hospital and the greater their co-morbidities.
Conclusion There is potential to improve the practice of setting goals and limitations of treatment in this acute hospital.
- Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.