rss
BMJ Support Palliat Care 3:130 doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000453b.16
  • Marie Curie abstracts
  • Posters

ARE PALLIATIVE CARE RESEARCH SAMPLES BIASED? RESULTS FROM INTERVIEWS WITH EXPERIENCED PALLIATIVE CARE STAFF

  1. J Hennings1
  1. 1International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University
  2. 2Trinity Hospice and Palliative Care Services, Blackpool
  3. 3St Catherine's Hospice, Preston

Abstract

Introduction There is evidence that palliative care patients wish to be involved in palliative care research (Terry et al 2006) but recruitment proves problematic (Bennett 2010).

Aims and Methods The purpose of this small study was to understand issues about patient recruitment to research studies in hospice settings from clinicians' and researchers' perspectives. Researchers and clinicians were recruited from various palliative care settings (n=12). Participants were interviewed individually or in pairs using guided questions during June/July 2012. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and content analysis performed.

Results The sample included research practitioners (n=3), clinicians (n=7) and professionals with dual research and clinical roles (n=2). Rather than asking all eligible patients, staff practice ‘gatekeeping’, only asking those who fit their ‘ideal participant criteria’. These patients were stereotypically deemed nice, co-operative, chatty and young. Those who tended not to be approached were poorly, emotional, angry or older. However, staff recognised that patients wanted to contribute to research and should be invited. They had experience of patients acting autonomously including those who declined or withdrew from studies so there was some evidence that patients could make these decisions for themselves.

Conclusions There appears to be an unwritten code to only include those fitting the ideal research participant stereotype. Secondary screening for the ideal participant may create a biased sample and fail to address issues pertinent to all palliative care patients. Such gate keeping also denies patients the potential satisfaction of having contributed to knowledge development.

Free sample issue
This recent issue is  free  to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.

View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article