Guideline for the management of terminal haemorrhage in palliative care patients with advanced cancer discharged home for end-of-life care
- 1St Raphael's Hospice, Cheam, Sutton, Surrey
- 2Palliative Care Department, Prince Charles Hospital, Merthyr Tydfil, Cwm Taf, UK
- Correspondence to Edith Ubogagu, St Raphael's Hospice, Heam, Surrey, UK eau00{at}imperial.ac.uk
-
Contributors EU formulated the idea, algorithm and aide memoire, compiled the guidelines and wrote the drafts. DGH edited the drafts.
Abstract
Objective Terminal haemorrhage is a rare and distressing emergency in palliative oncology. We present an algorithm for the management of terminal haemorrhage in patients likely to receive end-of-life care at home, based on a literature review of the management of terminal haemorrhage for patients with advanced cancer, where a DNAR (do not attempt resuscitation) order is in place and the patient wishes to die at home.
Method A literature review was conducted to identify literature on the management of terminal haemorrhage in patients with advanced cancer who are no longer amenable to active interventional/invasive procedures. Electronic databases, the grey literature, local guidelines from hospitals and hospices, and online web portals were all searched systematically. The literature review was used to formulate a management algorithm.
Results The evidence base is very limited. A three-step practical algorithm is suggested: preparing for the event, managing the event (‘ABC’) and ‘aftercare’. Step 1 involves the identification and optimisation of risk factors. Step 2 (the event) consists of A (assure and re-assure the patient), B (be there – above all stay with the patient) and C (comfort, calm, consider dark towels and anxiolytics if possible). Step 3 (the aftercare) involves the provision of practical and psychological support to those involved including relatives and professionals.
Conclusion Terminal haemorrhage is a rare yet highly feared complication of advanced cancer, for which there is a limited evidence base to guide management. The suggested three-step approach to managing this situation gives professionals a logical framework within which to work.
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed
- Received 22 March 2012.
- Accepted 17 July 2012.
- Published Online First 4 September 2012
- Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions








