A study of 300 cancer patients in Hong Kong shows that 92% of patients include themselves in decision-making, while 71% include their family and 65% their doctor. 68 percent of patients who include themselves in decision-making prefer to do so jointly with others; 55% want to join both the doctor and family to form a triad; 13% want decision-making with the family as a dyad and exclude the doctor; only 3% want a decision-making dyad with the doctor without their family. Less than 5% of patients want decision-making by ‘doctor-alone’, ‘patient-doctor’ or ‘doctor-family’ dyads and <1% of patients desire decision-making by ‘family-alone’.
In this study, only 25% patients have discussed their post-competent treatment preferences with other people; 93% patients have never heard of AD, and 25% refuse to discuss AD. After explaining AD to patients who are willing to talk about it, patients agree that AD would protect their autonomy in their post-competent treatment choices. Yet, two-third of patients refuse to sign an AD instantly, and prefer to leave oral instructions to specify their post-competent treatment preferences. Among patients who refuse to sign an AD, 42% want their family to make decisions when they become incompetent. It seems that Chinese cancer patients only rely on their family in their post-competent decision-making, but refuse to delegate decision-making to their family when they are still competent. The implications of these findings will be discussed.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.